English subordinators

Last updated

English subordinators (also known as subordinating conjunctions or complementizers ) are words that mostly mark clauses as subordinate. The subordinators form a closed lexical category in English and include whether; and, in some of their uses, if, that, for, arguably to, and marginally how.

Contents

Syntactically, they appear immediately before the subordinate element. Semantically, they tend to be empty.

Terminology and membership

Peter Matthews defines subordinator as "a word, etc. which marks a clause as subordinate." [1] Most dictionaries and many traditional grammar books use the term subordinating conjunction and include a much larger set of words, most of them prepositions such as before, when, and though that take clausal complements. [2] :599 The generative grammar tradition uses the term complementizer, a term which sometimes excludes the prepositions. [1] [3]

Membership

The subordinators are whether; and, in some of their uses, if , that, for, arguably to, and marginally how.

Whether

Whether is always a subordinator. It marks closed interrogative content clauses such as I wonder whether this would work. It is often possible to substitute if for whether, the main exceptions being when the subordinate clause functions as the subject, as in Whether it's true is an empirical question and cases with or not, such as I'll be there whether you are there or not. [2] :973–975

If

If is a subordinator when it marks closed interrogative content clauses such as I wonder if this would work. It is always possible to substitute whether for subordinator if. [2] :600,972–976 Where such substitution is not possible, if is instead a preposition, usually with a meaning that is usually conditional [2] :737ff,774 but sometimes concessive (They were jubilant, if exhausted, etc). [2] :738

That

That is a subordinator when it marks declarative content clauses such as I think that this would work and in relative clauses such as the fact that he was there. [2] :951–954 In contexts where it could be contrasted with this, it is a determiner. [2] :373–374 [lower-alpha 1]

For

For is a subordinator only when it marks infinitival clauses having a subject such as for this to happen (in which this is the subject). [2] :1178–1183 In sentences like "I shall not be imprisoned unjustly, for I have rights", it is instead a preposition. [2] :655–656,1321–1322

To

To is arguably a subordinator when it marks infinitival verb phrases such as To be sure, we'd have to double check (but a preposition in I went to Peoria). If it is a subordinator then it is the only one that marks a verb phrase, not a clause, as subordinate. [2] :1185

How

How is a marginal subordinator only when it marks finite clauses such as She told him how it wasn't fun any more. Note that that could substitute for how in this example. [2] :954 Elsewhere how is an adverb [2] :584,908 or occasionally (as in How are you?) an adjective. [2] :569,907–909

Various linguists, including Geoffrey K. Pullum, Paul Postal and Richard Hudson, and Robert Fiengo have suggested that to in cases like I want to go is an acutely defective auxiliary verb: one with no tensed forms. [4] Rodney Huddleston argues against this position in The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language , but Robert Levine counters these arguments. [5] Bettelou Los calls Pullum's arguments that to is an auxiliary verb "compelling". [6]

Subordinators vs other categories

Subordinators vs prepositions

Traditional grammar includes in its class of "subordinating conjunctions" prepositions like because, while, and unless, which take a clausal complement. But since at least Otto Jespersen (see English prepositions for the historical development of the idea) most modern grammarians distinguish these two categories based on whether they add meaning to the sentence or are purely functional. The distinction can be shown with if, since there is a subordinator if and a preposition if. [2] :600 The preposition is needed to express a meaning, usually conditional (e.g., If it works, that's great). Subordinators, though, have no meaning. They just mark a clause as subordinate; there is no difference in meaning between I know that you were there and I know you were there. Similarly, in She asked if we were there the subordinator if merely marks the following clause as a closed interrogative content clause, without contributing anything to a conditional, concessive, or other meaning.

Notes

  1. In the terminology of The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (which reserves the name "determiner" for a function), it is a determinative.

Related Research Articles

In linguistics and grammar, a pronoun is a word or a group of words that one may substitute for a noun or noun phrase.

English grammar is the set of structural rules of the English language. This includes the structure of words, phrases, clauses, sentences, and whole texts.

Prepositions and postpositions, together called adpositions, are a class of words used to express spatial or temporal relations or mark various semantic roles.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English auxiliary verbs</span> Small set of grammatically distinctive verbs of English

Englishauxiliary verbs are a small set of English verbs, which include the English modal auxiliary verbs and a few others. Although the auxiliary verbs of English are widely believed to lack inherent semantic meaning and instead to modify the meaning of the verbs they accompany, they are nowadays classed by linguists as auxiliary on the basis not of semantic but of grammatical properties: among these, that they invert with their subjects in interrogative main clauses and are negated either by the simple addition of not or by negative inflection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English modal auxiliary verbs</span> Class of auxiliary verbs in English that lack untensed forms

The English modal auxiliary verbs are a subset of the English auxiliary verbs used mostly to express modality (properties such as possibility and obligation). They can most easily be distinguished from other verbs by their defectiveness (they do not have participles or plain forms) and by their lack of the ending ‑(e)s for the third-person singular.

Relative clauses in the English language are formed principally by means of relative words. The basic relative pronouns are who, which, and that; who also has the derived forms whom and whose. Various grammatical rules and style guides determine which relative pronouns may be suitable in various situations, especially for formal settings. In some cases the relative pronoun may be omitted and merely implied.

In linguistics, a complementizer or complementiser is a functional category that includes those words that can be used to turn a clause into the subject or object of a sentence. For example, the word that may be called a complementizer in English sentences like Mary believes that it is raining. The concept of complementizers is specific to certain modern grammatical theories. In traditional grammar, such words are normally considered conjunctions. The standard abbreviation for complementizer is C.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English subjunctive</span> English embedded clause type marking non-real possibilities

While the English language lacks distinct inflections for mood, an English subjunctive is recognized in most grammars. Definition and scope of the concept vary widely across the literature, but it is generally associated with the description of something other than apparent reality. Traditionally, the term is applied loosely to cases in which one might expect a subjunctive form in related languages, especially Old English and Latin. This includes conditional clauses, wishes, and reported speech. Modern descriptive grammars limit the term to cases in which some grammatical marking can be observed, nevertheless coming to varying definitions.

One is an English language, gender-neutral, indefinite pronoun that means, roughly, "a person". For purposes of verb agreement it is a third-person singular pronoun, though it sometimes appears with first- or second-person reference. It is sometimes called an impersonal pronoun. It is more or less equivalent to the Scots "a body", the French pronoun on, the German/Scandinavian man, and the Spanish uno. It can take the possessive form one's and the reflexive form oneself, or it can adopt those forms from the generic he with his and himself.

<i>The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language</i> 2002 compendium on the English language

The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language (CamGEL) is a descriptive grammar of the English language. Its primary authors are Rodney Huddleston and Geoffrey K. Pullum. Huddleston was the only author to work on every chapter. It was published by Cambridge University Press in 2002 and has been cited more than 8,000 times.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English prepositions</span> Prepositions in the English language

English prepositions are words – such as of, in, on, at, from, etc. – that function as the head of a prepositional phrase, and most characteristically license a noun phrase object. Semantically, they most typically denote relations in space and time. Morphologically, they are usually simple and do not inflect. They form a closed lexical category.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English pronouns</span> Category of words in English that prototypically "stand in" for other noun phrases

The English pronouns form a relatively small category of words in Modern English whose primary semantic function is that of a pro-form for a noun phrase. Traditional grammars consider them to be a distinct part of speech, while most modern grammars see them as a subcategory of noun, contrasting with common and proper nouns. Still others see them as a subcategory of determiner. In this article, they are treated as a subtype of the noun category.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English nouns</span> Part of speech

English nouns form the largest category of words in English, both in terms of the number of different words and in terms of how often they are used in typical texts. The three main categories of English nouns are common nouns, proper nouns, and pronouns. A defining feature of English nouns is their ability to inflect for number, as through the plural –s morpheme. English nouns primarily function as the heads of noun phrases, which prototypically function at the clause level as subjects, objects, and predicative complements. These phrases are the only English phrases whose structure includes determinatives and predeterminatives, which add abstract specifying meaning such as definiteness and proximity. Like nouns in general, English nouns typically denote physical objects, but they also denote actions, characteristics, relations in space, and just about anything at all. Taken all together, these features separate English nouns from the language's other lexical categories, such as adjectives and verbs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English clause syntax</span> Clauses in English grammar

This article describes the syntax of clauses in the English language, chiefly in Modern English. A clause is often said to be the smallest grammatical unit that can express a complete proposition. But this semantic idea of a clause leaves out much of English clause syntax. For example, clauses can be questions, but questions are not propositions. A syntactic description of an English clause is that it is a subject and a verb. But this too fails, as a clause need not have a subject, as with the imperative, and, in many theories, an English clause may be verbless. The idea of what qualifies varies between theories and has changed over time.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English adjectives</span> Adjectives in the English language

English adjectives form a large open category of words in English which, semantically, tend to denote properties such as size, colour, mood, quality, age, etc. with such members as other, big, new, good, different, Cuban, sure, important, and right. Adjectives head adjective phrases, and the most typical members function as modifiers in noun phrases. Most adjectives either inflect for grade or combine with more and most to form comparatives and superlatives. They are characteristically modifiable by very. A large number of the most typical members combine with the suffix -ly to form adverbs. Most adjectives function as complements in verb phrases, and some license complements of their own.

LFN has an analytic grammar and resembles the grammars of languages such as the Haitian Creole, Papiamento, and Afrikaans. On the other hand, it uses a vocabulary drawn from several modern romance languages – Portuguese, Spanish, Catalan, French, and Italian.

If is an English preposition, as seen in If it's sunny tomorrow, (then) we'll have a picnic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English interrogative words</span> English words that indicate a question is being asked, as a grammatical category

The English interrogative words are words in English with a central role in forming interrogative phrases and clauses and in asking questions. The main members associated with open-ended questions are how, what, when, where, which, who, whom, whose, and why, all of which also have -ever forms. Those associated with closed-ended questions are whether and if.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English relative words</span> Words marking English relative clauses and fused relatives

The English relative words are words in English used to mark a clause, noun phrase or preposition phrase as relative. The central relative words in English include who, whom, whose, which, why, and while, as shown in the following examples, each of which has the relative clause in bold:

If is a subordinator similar to whether, marking the subordinate clause as interrogative.

References

  1. 1 2 Matthews, Peter H. (2003). The Concise Oxford Dictionary of Linguistics. Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   9780199675128.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 Huddleston, Rodney; Pullum, Geoffrey K. (2002). The Cambridge Grammar of the English Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978052143146-0.
  3. Aarts, Bas; Chalker, Sylvia; Weiner, Edmund (2014). The Oxford Dictionary of English Grammar (2nd ed.). Oxford: Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-174444-0.
  4. Pullum, Geoffrey K. (1982). "Syncategorematicity and English infinitival to". Glossa. 16: 181–215.
  5. Levine, Robert D. (2012). "Auxiliaries: To's company". Journal of Linguistics. 48 (1): 187–203. doi:10.1017/S002222671100034X. ISSN   0022-2267.
  6. Los, Bettelou (2005). The Rise of the To-Infinitive. Oxford University Press. p. 208. doi:10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199274765.001.0001. ISBN   978-0-19-927476-5.