Environmental gentrification

Last updated

Environmental, ecological or green gentrification is a process in which cleaning up pollution or providing green amenities increases local property values and attracts wealthier residents to a previously polluted or disenfranchised neighbourhood. [1] [2] [3] Green amenities include green spaces, parks, green roofs, gardens and green and energy efficient building materials. [4] These initiatives can heal many environmental ills from industrialization and beautify urban landscapes. Additionally, greening is imperative for reaching a sustainable future. However, if accompanied by gentrification, these initiatives can have an ambiguous social impact. [5] More specifically, in certain cases the introduction of green amenities might lead to (1) the physical displacement of low income households due to soaring housing costs, [3] and/or (2) the cultural, social, and political displacement of long-time residents. [6] First coined by Sieg et al. (2004), [7] environmental gentrification is a relatively new concept, although it can be considered as a new hybrid of the older and wider topics of gentrification and environmental justice. Social implications of greening projects specifically with regards to housing affordability and displacement of vulnerable citizens. Greening in cities can be both healthy and just.

Contents

Gentrification

Gentrification is a process whereby a neighborhood is transformed in order to cater to a wealthier home buyer or investor. [8] The process often takes place in working-class neighborhoods that are inhabited by low-income residents. Real-estate development such as luxury condominiums or the transformation of old factories into trendy lofts, attract wealthier investors. [9] [10] As the process progresses, low-income residents are pushed out or to the outskirts of the neighborhood as real-estate and rent prices are increased due to demand. Also, as middle-class residents enter the neighbourhood surrounding businesses transform to accommodate desires. Gentrification has often been promoted by local governments through policies that promote 'urban renewal.' [8] Generally, the process is considered to benefit the local economy and improve neighborhoods.

Three phases of gentrification in North America have been recognized:

  1. 1960s–1970s – A process led by the government, which hoped to reinvest capital to the inner city.
  2. 1970s – Widespread in big cities and spreading to smaller towns across North America. An example is the promotion of art communities such as Soho Manhattan to attract residents and investors.
  3. 1990s – Extensive large-scale development increased in scale and complexity through public-private partnerships.

As wealthier citizens have started to demand green amenities, cities have shifted their focus to marrying urban redevelopment with green initiatives all of which follow a similar process. Some of these initiatives can be seen through changes in various infrastructure, people changing their means of transportation to things such as biking and walking, as well as the displacement of people, all of which may lead to the gentrification of a neighborhood. [11]

Urban planning and sustainability

Sustainability is used by governments and developers to promote green initiatives and urban green space. [12] Originally growing from the promotion of sustainable development in developing countries, sustainability gained global recognition following the 1992 United Nations Earth Summit, which introduced the 17 Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). [13] The concept of sustainability is based on achieving a balance between three pillars: economy, environment, and social equity. However, implementing this balance in practice remains challenging. [14] Criticism arises on how well urban sustainability efforts promote social equity, as many development projects do not account for the impact that economic growth has on the existing community. [15]

The social equity aspect of sustainability focuses on enabling local communities to participate in decision-making processes and benefit from development projects. Public participation is intended to ensure that the needs and concerns of local residents are met. The redevelopment of brownfield sites, including post-industrial areas and abandoned lots, has become a key element of large-scale urban greening projects. These sites, which are often located near downtown areas or waterfronts, typically require environmental remediation and are supported by economic incentives from various governmental bodies. [16] These redevelopments frequently promote sustainability through urban planning mechanisms like new urbanism, which emphasizes the creation of cities that are livable, self-sustaining, cooler, and walkable. [17] [18]

Cities and individuals are increasingly responding to ecological challenges through eco-friendly planning and initiatives. Cities such as Chicago, with the Bloomingdale Trail (606), and New York City, with The High Line, have introduced green spaces into densely populated areas to enhance greenery and provide urban green spaces. According to estimates from the United Nations, around 54% of the world's population currently lives in urban areas, with this figure expected to rise to 66% by 2050. [19] Cities can be understood as functioning like metabolic organisms, extracting, using, and disposing of resources over time. The study of urban environments can reveal patterns of spatial inequality, such as the observed negative correlation between the provision of green spaces and the presence of African-American and Hispanic populations in the United States. [20] Green spaces in these neighborhoods are often less maintained and policed, while those in more affluent areas tend to support activities for wealthier residents, to maintain a certain social order. [21]

Definitions and concepts

The introduction of green spaces in urban areas has historically led to increases in property values, which can displace long-term residents. This process, referred to as environmental gentrification, occurs when low-income residents are priced out of their neighborhoods as a result of urban green space developments. [22] Although the definition of environmental gentrification is not fully agreed upon, it is generally understood as the process by which urban green space improvements contribute to the displacement of lower-income communities. [23]

Green gentrification is closely related to urban planning and climate mitigation efforts. Strategies such as installing shade structures, green walls, green roofs, and water features are often implemented to combat the urban heat island effect. [24] However, these improvements can lead to higher property values and subsequent displacement. Studies have shown a correlation between the creation of urban green spaces and increases in housing prices. For instance, property prices around the High Line in New York City increased by 35%, while prices near Chicago's Bloomingdale Trail rose by 13.8% to 48.2%. [25] [26]

Gentrification and evironmental justice in the United States

Redevelopment of Elbut Mill before The redevelopment of Elbut Mill - geograph.org.uk - 1828589.jpg
Redevelopment of Elbut Mill before
Redevelopment of Elbut Mill after The redevelopment of Elbut Mill - geograph.org.uk - 1828594.jpg
Redevelopment of Elbut Mill after

Environmental gentrification is a topic that intersects with environmental justice. The areas that are redeveloped with the intent of adding more environmentally friendly parks and greenspaces, are generally selected because the neglected property that can be purchased for a lower cost. [27] With the purchase of cheaper property and land, the intent to renovate and fix up these properties with the intent to eventually make a profit is clear. These properties are often in zones that are predominantly occupied by people of racial and ethnic minority, and were strategically zoned in areas more susceptible and proximal to toxic waste disposal as well as other types of contamination. [27] Despite these disproportionate effects, it does not appear to influence the actions of the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) in terms of determining priority for interventions. [28] As neighborhoods are cleaned up through Superfund cleanup programs, there are noticeable changes that have the tendency to follow, such as an increased number of people that move to the area, with more financial resources and higher levels of education. [28] As people with more financial resources move in, the previous residents are slowly pushed out as the costs of living become less affordable in comparison to before the development and gentrification of the area. Typically these neighborhoods are overtaken by a greater white population, resulting in the whitewashing of a neighborhood. [29] As neighborhoods gain more of a white population, there are increased instances of citizen-based policing of the youth, such as not only profiling, but also the baseless calling of law enforcement, disproportionately targeting people of color. [29] It has been seen that in larger plans to develop various areas, nonprofit organizations that focus on park development and greenspaces are relied upon, and due to their lack of specialty with the development of infrastructure, the consequences of gentrification such as the lack of affordable housing went ignored as parks were built. [30]

Urban green spaces are areas that are in an open space with the looks of a natural environment with greenery and at times water features.Green spaces do promote an aesthetically pleasing look and physical activity amongst people in the community, which promotes physical and mental well-being. [31] Green gentrification is applied to green spaces based on the accessibility of these improvements. Green spaces, such as parks and fields, can be placed in an unsafe neighborhood or a neighborhood that is disproportionately wealthy area, when there are areas with little to no green areas. [32] Moreover, the lack of green spaces in low income, urban areas green gentrification due to these communities at present struggling with financial matters. [31] The promotion of green areas has a positive effect on the communities, and the imbalance of greenery in wealthy versus low-income areas exhibits environmental injustice. Studies have shown green spaces in urban areas to have an effect on climate and health risks by lowering local temperature and improving air quality. [33]

Examples

Barcelona

Sant Marti District

A 15-year study (1990–2005) examined the social impacts or enhancing urban green spaces across the city of Barcelona. During the 1990s and 2000s, 18 new urban green parks were added to the city planning agenda. [34] First and foremost, as Barcelona was awarded the 1992 Olympic Games, the city prepared for the event through numerous urban developments which influenced a transformation of public spaces. [35] Previously, the city had been concerned with providing urban parks for the purpose of socializing and exercising. However, as the Olympics were swiftly approaching, urban planners and city governments took the opportunity to develop green spaces for mega-events. [36] These new types of spaces prioritize the aesthetic features of urban green space in an effort to attract tourists and offer memorable landscapes. [37] The legacy of mega-event urban parks can be observed in three notable parks around the city – Parc del Port Olimpic, Parc del Poblenou and Parc de Diagnol Mar. All three of these parks have shifted neighborhood demographics towards greater affluence. [36]

The city of Barcelona released its plan for sustainability titled Barcelona Green Infrastructure and Biodiversity Plan 2020. This document does not contain plans for housing affordability or social impacts that are a result from large-scale development. [38] Diagonal Mar project provides an example of the green initiatives being coupled with large-scale urban redevelopment on a previous brownfield site. Historically, the area was an industry hub as it is located near the Mediterranean Sea. The Diagonal Mar project includes luxury condominiums, three hotels, three office buildings, a shopping mall nested within an urban green space. The project has been criticized for not considering local input into planning as lacking spaces for social interactions for citizens. [3] [37]

Studies suggest that green gentrification has occurred in correspondence with park development in the Sant Marti district. Using neighbourhood measurements of wealth, the authors suggest that demographic shifts of the neighbourhood have taken place at an alarming rate 1990–2005. Moreover, areas surrounding parks have experienced clear indicators of these changes as there has been an increase in: residents with a bachelor's degree, residents from the global North, household income or home sale and an overall decrease in the population of residents 65 and older living alone. [36]

Percentage of Population Change within 300m of Parks Compared to District Average of Sant Marti [36]
Time Period of DataPark Name (Year Built)Bachelor's DegreeDistrict Avg.Over 65 Years of AgeDistrict AverageGlobal North ImmigrantDistrict AverageFamily IncomeDistrict Average
(1991–2006)Parc del Port Olimpic (1992)27.92%7.59%−1.52%1.82%7.4%3.22%19.21%2.8%
(1991–2006)Parc del Poblenou (1992)25.98%7.59%−2.97%1.82%6.9%3.22%14.42%2.8%
(2004–2006)Parc de Diagnol Mar (2002)4.69%1.37%−0.18%0.06%1.71%2.19%4.2%2.1%

New York City

The High Line

The High Line is a 1.45-mile-long (2.33 km) an elevated public park that was constructed on a historic freight line along the west side of Manhattan in New York City. [39] Previous to its redevelopment, the High Line represented the deterioration of New York's industry, the neighbourhood of alongside the High Line, Chelsea, had frequent delinquency. Since the 1980s the city government has attempted to tear it down. In response, activists ventured to save the High Line and proposed that it could be returned to the community as a provision of public good. [40] As the High Line was acquired by the CSX Transportation Inc. in 1999, community board meetings provided an avenue for alternative uses to be proposed. [41] At around the same time, Joshua David and Robert Hammond formed a non-profit they called Friends of the High Line with the main goal of to acquiring public and private funds to save the bridge from demolition. Notable celebrities – Edward Norton, Martha Stewart and Kevin Bacon provided financial support for the project. [42] Friends of the High Line presented a redevelopment strategy to the Bloomberg administration, suggesting that the bridge could be converted into a public park, arguing that this would provide economic benefits to the surrounding neighborhood and generate substantial tax revenues. [43] The Bloomberg administration accepted the initiative, and Mayor Bloomberg provided a statement of support by stating, "The Board's ruling is a great win for all New Yorkers. It allows us to implement our plans to preserve this valuable historic resource, create a much needed public open space and strengthen our city's economy." [44]

Evidence that this project has ignited gentrification can be observed through the soaring real estate prices as well as types of activities that are being attracted to the High Line and its surrounding areas. In just two years, there has been a production of $2 billion real-estate construction which has contributed an additional $900 million in tax revenues. [43] Additionally, the relocation of Whitney Museum of American Art nearby sheds light on the popularity of the park.

The High Line, although presented as a public park, privileges certain users and activities. [41] Friends of the High Line allow for only certain types of vendors as well as provides private security guards. Visitors of the High Line can enjoy artisanal foods, micro-brewed beer and browse up-scaled art merchant booths. The promotion of economic growth and certain types of consumption coupled with surveillance results in the neoliberalization of this public spaces. [41] The High Line, although a famous icon for the city, may fall short of providing open spaces and benefits for all citizens to use and enjoy. [41] Instead it more closely resembles a place of spatial 'privilege' [45] where claims to public space are dominated by upper-class citizens.

Concurrently in 2007, the Bloomberg administration released the PlaNYC 2030: A Greater, Greener New York which aimed to combat climate change through expanding sustainability measured with 132 initiatives. One goal highlights the social pillar of sustainability by having a goal that every citizen in the city will have a green space within a 10-minute walking distance from their home.

Vancouver

False Creek

The traditional urban layout of Vancouver was reminiscent of a small town. Grid-iron patterned streets were lined with single-family dwellings, businesses could be found along main streets and industry was concentrated along shorelines and inlets. The 1960s ushered in a shift towards higher densities through high rise residential buildings in the downtown core. In the 1980s, redevelopment of brownsites (former industrial areas) for condominium development in the False Creek region was a result of it being the site for Expo 1986. [46] Previously, this area was the heartland of industry and had begun to deteriorate as industry shifted. [46] After the Expo, the site was acquired by Hong Kong billionaire Li Ka-Shing for $320 million and a numerous residential luxury developments followed suite. [47] These developments promoted a tone of sustainability that were supported through planning documents such as Livable Region Strategic Planning (1996). Urban planning strategies such as smart growth stressed environmental goals could be achieved through the provision of walkable and mixed-use urban areas which would reduce urban sprawl. [48] Critiques of smart growth highlight the equity aspects of the strategy, as it often ignores low-income residents. [49] Housing affordability became an issue during 2001–2007 as the price for a typical two-bedroom in the west end of Vancouver shifted from $260,000 to $650,000. [50] In 2008, the city council accepted EcoDensity as a solution to housing affordability which promoted further densification of downtown and surrounding neighbourhoods. EcoDensity is the solution to housing affordability rather than provision of social housing. A number of towers were constructed in the downtown Eastside displaced approximately 4,000 low-income residents from June 2007 – January 2008. [50] Critiques of EcoDensity suggest that the strategy does not account for enough citizen input in planning measures. [51]

Vancouver has become one of the most popular cities in the world to live as it offers breathtaking mountain views and access to numerous beaches. As Vancouver was awarded the 2010 Winter Olympics, which led to the development of "Millenium Water" along the South Eastern portion of False Creek which became the site for the Olympic Athlete Village. This project boasted European-styled walkways, green roofs and sustainability characteristics. [52] No low-income housing was provided with this project and one-bedroom condos starting price was $500,000. [52] In an effort to reduce ecological impacts, the project promoted a habitat restoration project whereby leftover dirt was used to create an island for bird nesting. [53] In 2006, water squatters, people living in boats in False Creek waters, were evicted in an effort to clean up the area. [53] The False Creek redevelopment was advertised as a park-like nature for new residents and tourists and promoted as a space for leisure. [54] Scholars suggest that there is a disconnect between the promotion of environmental discourses and issues of equity which results in a class conflict over space in the city. [50] [53] Although Vancouver is a highly desirable place to live, the promotion of sustainability through policies ignores provision of much needed affordable housing allocations.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gentrification</span> Urban socioeconomic process

Gentrification is the process whereby the character of a neighborhood changes through the influx of more affluent residents and investment. There is no agreed-upon definition of gentrification. In public discourse, it has been used to describe a wide array of phenomena, sometimes in a pejorative connotation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urban renewal</span> Land redevelopment in cities

Urban renewal is a program of land redevelopment often used to address urban decay in cities. Urban renewal involves the clearing out of blighted areas in inner cities in favour of new housing, businesses, and other developments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pocket park</span> Small park accessible to the public

A pocket park is a small park accessible to the general public. While the locations, elements, and uses of pocket parks vary considerably, the common defining characteristic of a pocket park is its small size. Typically, a pocket park occupies one to three municipal lots and is smaller than 0.5 hectares in size.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Infill</span> Rededication of land in an urban environment to new construction

In urban planning, infill, or in-fill, is the rededication of land in an urban environment, usually open-space, to new construction. Infill also applies, within an urban polity, to construction on any undeveloped land that is not on the urban margin. The slightly broader term "land recycling" is sometimes used instead. Infill has been promoted as an economical use of existing infrastructure and a remedy for urban sprawl. Detractors view increased urban density as overloading urban services, including increased traffic congestion and pollution, and decreasing urban green-space. Many also dislike it for social and historical reasons, partly due to its unproven effects and its similarity with gentrification.

The term "sustainable communities" has various definitions, but in essence refers to communities planned, built, or modified to promote sustainable living. Sustainable communities tend to focus on environmental and economic sustainability, urban infrastructure, social equity, and municipal government. The term is sometimes used synonymously with "green cities," "eco-communities," "livable cities" and "sustainable cities."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Livability</span>

Livability or liveability is the degree to which a place is good for living. Livability refers to the concerns that are related to the long-term wellbeing of individuals and communities. It encompasses factors like neighborhood amenities, including parks, open space, walkways, grocery shops and restaurants as well as environmental quality, safety and health. It also incorporates things like cost and friendliness. These features contribute to the pleasantness and accessibility of communities. Additionally, livability considers the availability and quality of public transport, educational institutions and healthcare facilities. It also considers the overall cultural and social atmosphere of a place, including the presence of diverse recreational activities and community engagement opportunities. All these factors combined create an environment that enhances the overall quality of life for residents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Green infrastructure</span> Sustainable and resilient infrastructure

Green infrastructure or blue-green infrastructure refers to a network that provides the “ingredients” for solving urban and climatic challenges by building with nature. The main components of this approach include stormwater management, climate adaptation, the reduction of heat stress, increasing biodiversity, food production, better air quality, sustainable energy production, clean water, and healthy soils, as well as more anthropocentric functions, such as increased quality of life through recreation and the provision of shade and shelter in and around towns and cities. Green infrastructure also serves to provide an ecological framework for social, economic, and environmental health of the surroundings. More recently scholars and activists have also called for green infrastructure that promotes social inclusion and equity rather than reinforcing pre-existing structures of unequal access to nature-based services.

Urban consolidation describes the policy of constraining further development and population growth to within the boundaries of preexisting urban areas rather than expanding outward into suburban areas. Urban consolidation seeks to increase the population density of a given urban area by expanding upward, redeveloping preexisting buildings and lots, and constructing new facilities in available spaces. It is theorized that discouraging urban sprawl and encouraging further development of housing units in preexisting urban areas will lead to a net gain in social and economic prosperity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urban green space</span> Green area planned in an urban location

In land-use planning, urban green spaces are open-space areas reserved for parks and other "green spaces", including plant life, water features – also referred to as blue spaces – and other kinds of natural environment. Most urban open spaces are green spaces, but occasionally include other kinds of open areas. The landscape of urban open spaces can range from playing fields, to highly maintained environments, to relatively natural landscapes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Land recycling</span> Reuse of abandoned buildings or sites

Land recycling is the reuse of abandoned, vacant, or underused properties for redevelopment or repurposing.

Green affordable housing is reasonably priced housing that incorporates sustainable features. The phenomenon has become increasingly common in all over the world as climate change and the cost of housing become alarming issues. For example, the United States adopted state and local policies that favor or require green building practices for publicly owned or funded buildings. Potential benefits of green affordable housing include lower energy cost burden and improved health. One challenge to green affordable housing is the tendency to prioritize short-term costs over long-term benefits, leading to higher upfront cost. The challenge for green housing advocates is to see to the life cycle cost of the building. Many affordable housing projects already find it a challenge to raise capital to finance basic affordable housing. This challenge is compounded by the phenomenon of urban greening and environmental gentrification, which can drive up housing prices and becomes a challenge for green affordable housing. Green affordable housing has taken form in traditionally wooden homes, green homes and most recently with 'upcycling' shipping containers.

The gentrification of Vancouver, Canada, has been the subject of debate between those who wish to promote gentrification and those who do not.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">The New Faubourg Lafitte</span>

New Faubourg Lafitte is a residential development in New Orleans, Louisiana, U.S. It largely occupies the area formerly filled by the since demolished Lafitte Projects public housing.

Verticalization is a phenomenon, typically seen in major cities, where there is a general increase in the population of high-rise residential buildings. As of 2024, there is no agreed-upon definition of verticalization.

Innovation districts are urban geographies of innovation where R&D strong institutions, companies, and other private actors develop integrated strategies and solutions to develop thriving innovation ecosystems–areas that attract entrepreneurs, startups, and business incubators. Unlike science parks, innovation districts are physically compact, leverage density and high levels of accessibility, and provide a “mash up” of activities including housing, office, and neighborhood-serving amenities. Districts signify the collapse back of innovation into cities and is increasingly used as a way to revitalize the economies of cities and their broader regions. As of 2019, there are more than 100 districts worldwide.

Gentrification, the process of altering the demographic and socioeconomic composition of a neighborhood usually by decreasing the percentage of low-income minority residents and increasing the percentage higher-income residents, has been an issue between the residents of minority neighborhoods in Chicago who believe the influx of new residents destabilizes their communities, and the gentrifiers who see it as a process that economically improves a neighborhood. Researchers have debated the significance of its effects on the neighborhoods and whether or not it leads to the displacement of residents.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gentrification of Mexico City</span>

Mexico City has massively been expanding its urban fabric and population density, becoming the sixth largest city in the world. A combination of neoliberal policies, complex geographic location, socio-economic disparities and inefficient strategies have influenced the process of gentrification in the city. The combination of numerous megaprojects, inefficient city-planning strategies, and remote work after the COVID-19 pandemic have led to dysfunctions in circulation, community allocation and equal access to resources. In consequence, middle and low-income communities have been directly or indirectly alienated and challenged to adapt to a complex and evolving urban environment, and the culture erasure that comes with the process of gentrification.

The Douglass Community Land Trust (DCLT) is a land trust to create community-based affordable housing effort in Washington, D.C., was incorporated in September 2019 in conjunction with the proposed 11th Street Bridge Park development along the Anacostia River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Urban ecotourism</span>

Urban ecotourism is a relatively new form of ecotourism that takes place in urban settings. The concept first appeared in 1996 when the Blackstone Corporation defined it as “[...] travel and exploration within and around an urban area that offers visitors enjoyment and appreciation of the city's natural areas and cultural resources, [...] promotes the city's long-term ecological health [...] promotes sustainable local economic and community development and vitality; [...] is accessible and equitable to all”. Urban ecotourism shares the same goals for sustainability and community development as traditional ecotourism, but applies them to large cities, industrial wastelands, and post-productivist agriculture sites, as opposed to more nature-based venues for traditional ecotourism. Destinations in these locations may take the form of linear parks, farm-to-table restaurants, rewilding parks, biking and hiking trails, sustainable hotels, and rooftop gardens.

Gentrification in the United States is commonly associated with an influx of higher-income movers into historically divested neighborhoods with existing, working-class residents, often resulting in increases in property prices and investment into new developments. Displacement and gentrification are also linked, with consequences of gentrification including displacement of pre-existing residents and cultural erasure of the historic community. In the United States, discussions surrounding gentrification require critical analysis of race and other demographic data in examining the inequalities and disparities between existing residents, the community, new buyers, and developers caused by gentrification.

References

  1. ↑ Assaad, Rayan H.; Jezzini, Yasser (1 May 2024). "Green gentrification vulnerability index (GGVI): A novel approach for identifying at-risk communities and promoting environmental justice at the census-tract level". Cities. 148: 104858. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2024.104858. ISSN   0264-2751.
  2. ↑ Banzhaf, H. Spencer; McCormick, Eleanor (2006). "Moving beyond cleanup: Identifying the crucibles of environmental gentrification". NCEE Working Paper Series.
  3. 1 2 3 Dooling, Sarah (2009). "Ecological gentrification: A research agenda exploring justice in the city". International Journal of Urban and Regional Research. 33 (3): 621–639. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2427.2009.00860.x.
  4. ↑ Jezzini, Yasser; Assaf, Ghiwa; Assaad, Rayan H. (January 2023). "Models and Methods for Quantifying the Environmental, Economic, and Social Benefits and Challenges of Green Infrastructure: A Critical Review". Sustainability. 15 (9): 7544. doi: 10.3390/su15097544 . ISSN   2071-1050.
  5. ↑ Assaad, Rayan H.; Jezzini, Yasser (14 May 2024). "Assessing and predicting green gentrification susceptibility using an integrated machine learning approach". Local Environment. 29 (8): 1099–1127. Bibcode:2024LoEnv..29.1099A. doi:10.1080/13549839.2024.2353058. ISSN   1354-9839.
  6. ↑ Goossens, Cedric; Oosterlynck, Stijn; Bradt, Lieve (20 April 2020). "Livable streets? Green gentrification and the displacement of longtime residents in Ghent, Belgium". Urban Geography. 41 (4): 550–572. doi:10.1080/02723638.2019.1686307.
  7. ↑ Sieg, Holger; Smith, V. Kerry; Banzhaf, H. Spencer; Walsh, Randall (2004). "Estimating the general equilibrium benefits of large changes in spatially delineated public goods". International Economic Review. 45 (4): 1047–77. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.462.768 . doi:10.1111/j.0020-6598.2004.00297.x. S2CID   154409046.
  8. 1 2 Lees, Loretta; Slater, Tom; Wyly, Evlin K. (2008). Gentrification. New York: Routledge/Taylor & Francis Group.
  9. ↑ Ruth Glass (1964). London: aspects of change. London: MacGibbon & Kee.
  10. ↑ Zukin, Sharon (1989). Loft Living. Rutgers UP.
  11. ↑ Rigolon, Alessandro; Németh, Jeremy (2019-10-03). "Toward a socioecological model of gentrification: How people, place, and policy shape neighborhood change". Journal of Urban Affairs. 41 (7): 887–909. doi:10.1080/07352166.2018.1562846. ISSN   0735-2166. S2CID   159171543.
  12. ↑ Quastel, Noah (October 2009). "Political Ecologies of Gentrification". Urban Geography. 30 (7): 694–725. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.30.7.694. ISSN   0272-3638.
  13. ↑ "THE 17 GOALS | Sustainable Development". sdgs.un.org. Retrieved 2024-10-14.
  14. ↑ Mary, College of William &; University, Northeastern; Tennessee, University of. "What Are the 3 Pillars of Sustainability?". Treehugger. Retrieved 2024-10-14.
  15. ↑ Immergluck, Dan; Balan, Tharunya (2018-04-21). "Sustainable for whom? Green urban development, environmental gentrification, and the Atlanta Beltline". Urban Geography. 39 (4): 546–562. doi:10.1080/02723638.2017.1360041. ISSN   0272-3638.
  16. ↑ "Environmental Gentrification". Critical Sustainabilities. 2013-09-11. Retrieved 2024-10-14.
  17. ↑ "Greening Global Cities | Departures Magazine". Departures International. Retrieved 2024-10-14.
  18. ↑ US EPA, OLEM (2015-04-28). "Sustainable Redevelopment at Superfund Sites". www.epa.gov. Retrieved 2024-10-14.
  19. ↑ Nations, United. "68% of the world population projected to live in urban areas by 2050, says UN". United Nations (in Ukrainian). Retrieved 2024-10-14.
  20. ↑ Han, Yuan; He, Jianhua; Liu, Dianfeng; Zhao, Hongzhuo; Huang, Junlong (2023-02-01). "Inequality in urban green provision: A comparative study of large cities throughout the world". Sustainable Cities and Society. 89: 104229. Bibcode:2023SusCS..8904229H. doi:10.1016/j.scs.2022.104229. ISSN   2210-6707.
  21. ↑ Jung, Eunah (2023-09-01). "Green spaces for whom? A latent profile analysis of park-rich or -deprived neighborhoods in New York City". Landscape and Urban Planning. 237: 104806. Bibcode:2023LUrbP.23704806J. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2023.104806. ISSN   0169-2046.
  22. ↑ "The Perils and Promises of Urban Greening". Yale Environment Review. 2021-03-30. Retrieved 2024-10-03.
  23. ↑ "Green Gentrification". Barcelona Lab for Urban Environmental Justice and Sustainability. Retrieved 2024-10-08.
  24. ↑ Williams, Jeremy (2021-07-14). "7 ways to reduce the urban heat island effect". The Earthbound Report. Retrieved 2024-10-08.
  25. ↑ Jo Black, Katie; Richards, Mallory (2020-12-01). "Eco-gentrification and who benefits from urban green amenities: NYC's high Line". Landscape and Urban Planning. 204: 103900. Bibcode:2020LUrbP.20403900J. doi:10.1016/j.landurbplan.2020.103900. ISSN   0169-2046.
  26. ↑ University, Institute for Housing Studies-DePaul. "Measuring the Impact of The 606". Institute for Housing Studies - DePaul University. Retrieved 2024-10-14.
  27. 1 2 Anguelovski, Isabelle (February 2016). "From Toxic Sites to Parks as (Green) LULUs? New Challenges of Inequity, Privilege, Gentrification, and Exclusion for Urban Environmental Justice". Journal of Planning Literature. 31 (1): 23–36. doi:10.1177/0885412215610491. ISSN   0885-4122. S2CID   156902272.
  28. 1 2 Gamper-Rabindran, Shanti; Timmins, Christopher (2011-05-01). "Hazardous Waste Cleanup, Neighborhood Gentrification, and Environmental Justice: Evidence from Restricted Access Census Block Data". American Economic Review. 101 (3): 620–624. doi:10.1257/aer.101.3.620. ISSN   0002-8282.
  29. 1 2 Harris, Brandon; Rigolon, Alessandro; Fernandez, Mariela (December 2020). ""To them, we're just kids from the hood": Citizen-based policing of youth of color, "white space," and environmental gentrification". Cities. 107: 102885. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2020.102885. S2CID   224867487.
  30. ↑ Rigolon, Alessandro; Németh, Jeremy (November 2018). ""We're not in the business of housing:" Environmental gentrification and the nonprofitization of green infrastructure projects". Cities. 81: 71–80. doi:10.1016/j.cities.2018.03.016. S2CID   158228374.
  31. 1 2 Cole, Helen V. S.; Triguero-Mas, Margarita; Connolly, James J. T.; Anguelovski, Isabelle (2019-05-01). "Determining the health benefits of green space: Does gentrification matter?". Health & Place. 57: 1–11. doi:10.1016/j.healthplace.2019.02.001. hdl: 10230/43372 . ISSN   1353-8292. PMID   30844594. S2CID   73486777.
  32. ↑ Rigolon, Alessandro; Németh, Jeremy (2020). "Green gentrification or 'just green enough': Do park location, size and function affect whether a place gentrifies or not?". Urban Studies. 57 (2): 402–420. Bibcode:2020UrbSt..57..402R. doi:10.1177/0042098019849380. ISSN   0042-0980. S2CID   198731566.
  33. ↑ Kong, Fanhua; Sun, Changfeng; Liu, Fengfeng; Yin, Haiwei; Jiang, Fei; Pu, Yingxia; Cavan, Gina; Skelhorn, Cynthia; Middel, Ariane; Dronova, Iryna (2016). "Energy saving potential of fragmented green spaces due to their temperature regulating ecosystem services in the summer". Applied Energy. 183: 1428–1440. Bibcode:2016ApEn..183.1428K. doi:10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.070.
  34. ↑ Parcs I, Jardins Barcelona (2007). "In Memoria". Barcelona: Ajuntament de Barcelona, Parcs I Jardins.
  35. ↑ Anguelovski, Isabelle (2014). "Community Reconstruction, Place Remaking, and Environmental Justice in the City". Neighborhood as a refuge: community reconstruction, place remaking, and environmental justice in the city. MIT Press. ISBN   9780262525695. JSTOR   j.ctt9qf73z.
  36. 1 2 3 4 Anguelovski, Isabelle (2017). "Assessing green gentrification in historically disenfranchised neighborhoods: a longitudinal and spatial analysis of Barcelona". Urban Geography: 1–34.
  37. 1 2 Sauri, David (2009). "Changing conceptions of sustainability in Barcelona's public parks". Geographical Review. 99 (1): 23–36. Bibcode:2009GeoRv..99...23S. doi:10.1111/j.1931-0846.2009.tb00416.x. S2CID   144161148.
  38. ↑ Gould, Kenneth A.; Lewis, Tammy L. (2016). Green gentrification: urban sustainability and the struggle for environmental justice. Routledge.
  39. ↑ Green, F (September 21, 2014). "New High Line section opens, extending the park to 34th St". Daily News. Archived from the original on September 21, 2014. Retrieved February 23, 2018.
  40. ↑ David, Joshua; Hammond, Robert (2011). High Line: The inside story of New York city's park in the sky. FSG Originals.
  41. 1 2 3 4 Loughran, Kevin (2014). "Parks for profit: The high line, growth machines, and uneven development of urban public spaces". City & Community. 13 (1): 49–68. doi:10.1111/cico.12050. S2CID   153523725.
  42. ↑ Demonchaux, Thomas (May 8, 2005). "How everyone jumped aboard a railroad to nowhere". The New York Times. Retrieved February 23, 2018.
  43. 1 2 McGeehan, Patrick (June 5, 2011). "The High Line isn't just a sight to see; it's also an economic dynamo". New York Times.
  44. ↑ Friends of the High Line. "Mayor authorization for High Line project [press release]".
  45. ↑ Kimmel, Michael (2003). PrivilegeL A Reader. Boulder, CO: Westview Press.
  46. 1 2 Mills, Caroline A. (1988). ""Life on the upslope": the postmodern landscape of gentrification". Environment and Planning D: Society and Space. 6 (2): 169–190. Bibcode:1988EnPlD...6..169M. doi:10.1068/d060169. S2CID   143309648.
  47. ↑ Olda, K. (1998). "Globalization and urban change: tales from Vancouver via Hong Kong". Urban Geography. 19 (4): 360–385. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.19.4.360.
  48. ↑ Krueger, Rob (2005). "Sustainability schizophrenia or "actually existing sustainabilities? toward a broader understanding of politics and promises of local sustainability in the US". Geoforum: 410–417. doi:10.1016/j.geoforum.2004.07.005.
  49. ↑ Pozdena, Randal J. (2002). "Smart growth and its effects on housing markets: the new segregation". National Center for Public Policy Research.
  50. 1 2 3 Lee, Marc (2008). "Affordable EcoDensity – Making affordable housing a core principle of Vancouver's EcoDensity charter". The Canadian Center for Policy Research.
  51. ↑ Robinson, Pamela (2009). New growth-management experiments in Canada. Planning for climate change: strategies for mitigation and adaptation for spatial planners.
  52. 1 2 Millenium Water (2008). "Vancouver's last waterfront community" . Retrieved February 20, 2018.
  53. 1 2 3 Quastel, Noah (2009). "Political ecologies of gentrifiction". Urban Geography. 30 (7): 694–725. doi:10.2747/0272-3638.30.7.694. S2CID   143989462.
  54. ↑ Braun, Bruce (2002). The intemperate rainforest: nature, culture and power on Canada's west coast. U of Minnesota Press.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.