Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant

Last updated
Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant
Forsmark3.jpg
Reactor 3 at Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant.
Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant
Country Sweden
Location Forsmark
Coordinates 60°24′12″N18°10′0″E / 60.40333°N 18.16667°E / 60.40333; 18.16667
StatusOperational
Commission date 1980
Owner(s)
  • Forsmarks Kraftgrupp
Operator(s) Vattenfall
Nuclear power station
Reactor type BWR
Cooling source Bothnian Sea
Power generation
Units operational1 × 1010 MW
1 × 1120 MW
1 × 1190 MW
Nameplate capacity 3,320 MW
Capacity factor 84.5%
Annual net output 24,000 GW·h
External links
Website karnkraft.vattenfall.se/forsmark
Commons Related media on Commons
[ edit on Wikidata]

Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant is a nuclear power plant in Forsmark, Sweden that provides 14% of Sweden's total electricity output, and also the site of the Swedish Final repository for radioactive operational waste. It is operated by a company mainly owned by Vattenfall.

Contents

The radiation monitors at Forsmark were the first outside the Soviet Union to detect the elevated radiation levels resulting from the Chernobyl disaster in April 1986, over 1,000 km away, forcing the Soviet government to publicly acknowledge it after two days of them trying to cover it up. [1]

Reactors

Forsmark NPP has three Boiling water reactors:

Other facilities

West of Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant is the static inverter of the Fenno–Skan HVDC connector between Sweden and Finland.

Waste disposal

Forsmark is the proposed site for the long-term burial of all spent fuel from Swedish nuclear power reactors, using the KBS-3 process. The new site will be located next to the already existing final repository for radioactive operational waste, but the two will not be connected with each other. The municipal councils of Oskarshamn and Östhammar have voted in favour of the repository, and the final decision needs to be made by the Swedish government. [2] On January 28, 2022, the government approved the construction of the encapsulation and final repository plants. [3]

Incidents

July 2006 incident

On 25 July 2006, one reactor was shut down after an electrical fault. [4] [5] According to the Swedish Nuclear Power Inspection authority SKI, the incident was rated 2 on the International Nuclear Event Scale. Initially it was rated 1 since two generators remained online. But once it was discovered that all four generators could have failed due to the same fault, the event was upgraded to 2.

The first proximal cause of the accident was maintenance work in the adjacent high-voltage yard by the Swedish grid operator Svenska kraftnät. An incorrect interlock procedure caused a disconnector to open which sustained an arc that caused a two-phase short circuit in equipment directly adjacent to the plant. This short caused the station generators to disconnect from the grid and, due to the failure of further safety systems this disconnection, in turn, led to a large overvoltage on various supplies within the station. The overvoltage caused failure of the control circuitry of two of the four redundant UPS systems which supplied the safety critical equipment at the plant, including cooling pumps and control circuitry. Though diesel generators started correctly even on these two systems, the lack of control circuitry led to their being unable to engage with their corresponding circuits. The other two UPS systems functioned correctly, surviving the overvoltage, probably due to an undetermined subtle difference in wiring or equipment between the two pairs of units. The reactor fully and effectively scrammed immediately on detecting these supply failures, however staff relied on neutron detector readings to determine reactor state due to lack of information on control rod state. At all times effective cooling was maintained by the pumps operating on the two functioning circuits. Though a number of options remained to operators, had further equipment failed, a single cause (one short-circuit) leading to such a cascade of failures was seen as a challenge to the principle of redundancy and safety in depth. [6]

At the request of the Swedish Government, IAEA launched an OSART mission to Forsmark.

Lars-Olov Höglund, a former construction chief at Vattenfall, claimed it was the most serious nuclear incident in the world since the Chernobyl disaster and it was pure luck that prevented a meltdown. [7] Both the SKI and the safety chief of Forsmark power plant disagree with that opinion and state that the incident was serious but the description provided by Höglund was incorrect and there was no real risk of a meltdown. [8] Höglund has personally been involved in a legal dispute with Forsmark Nuclear powerplant for several years in connection with his private business. [9]

However, Kjell Olsson, a researcher at SKI, later stated in an informal discussion with schoolchildren that a meltdown technically could have developed from the incident. [10] The agency later stated that the failing safety system proved to be linked together in a delicate, extremely serious way. [11]

On March 14, 2011, Höglund commented that the Fukushima-disaster parallels the Forsmark incident, i.e. failing UPS system backup, and repeated his statement from 2007 that "only luck" prevented a meltdown at the Swedish plant. [12]

February 2007 shutdown

On February 3, two units at Forsmark were shut down to inspect a rubber seal in one of the safety systems. On Forsmark 1 this seal needed to be replaced, a job that would take approximately one month [13] . Unit 2 was cleared by the regulator SKI and was free to restart.

In January an internal report made by a few employees at Forsmark who were concerned over a "degrading safety culture" was leaked to media who ran an extensive story on it. In the storm following the report the Forsmark CEO chose to resign. Forsmark was already under way to implement a 60-point program designed to improve safety culture, designed shortly after the event in July 2006.

January 2022 drone sighting

On January 17, the Swedish Security Service took over an investigation into unauthorized drones seen flying over Forsmark and the Oskarshamn and Ringhals nuclear plants. [14]

Incursions by activists

In June 2010, Greenpeace activists invaded Forsmark to protest the then-plan to remove the government prohibition on building new nuclear power plants. In October 2012, 50 anti-nuclear activists used special ladders to scale security fences. Greenpeace said that its non-violent actions were protests against the continuing operation of these reactors, which it says are unsafe in European stress tests, and to emphasise that stress tests did nothing to prepare against threats from outside the plant. A report by the Swedish nuclear regulator said that "the current overall level of protection against sabotage is insufficient". Although Swedish nuclear power plants have security guards, the police are responsible for emergency response. The report criticised the level of cooperation between nuclear site staff and police in the case of sabotage or attack. [15]

Local geology

The geology around Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant has been investigated in detail by various researchers and research groups. It has been of particular interest to understand the long-term geologic stability of the area. A 2018 study found that the area of Forsmark, whose surface belongs to the Sub-Cambrian peneplain, lost 2 to 3 meters of crystalline bedrock due to erosion during the last glaciation. [16] This erosion consisted mostly of plucking of bedrock sheets and abrasion. [16] The same group of researchers estimates the total erosion in the last million years to be in the order of 20 to 40 m. [16]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pressurized water reactor</span> Type of nuclear reactor

A pressurized water reactor (PWR) is a type of light-water nuclear reactor. PWRs constitute the large majority of the world's nuclear power plants. In a PWR, the primary coolant (water) is pumped under high pressure to the reactor core where it is heated by the energy released by the fission of atoms. The heated, high pressure water then flows to a steam generator, where it transfers its thermal energy to lower pressure water of a secondary system where steam is generated. The steam then drives turbines, which spin an electric generator. In contrast to a boiling water reactor (BWR), pressure in the primary coolant loop prevents the water from boiling within the reactor. All light-water reactors use ordinary water as both coolant and neutron moderator. Most use anywhere from two to four vertically mounted steam generators; VVER reactors use horizontal steam generators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boiling water reactor</span> Type of nuclear reactor that directly boils water

A boiling water reactor (BWR) is a type of light water nuclear reactor used for the generation of electrical power. It is the second most common type of electricity-generating nuclear reactor after the pressurized water reactor (PWR), which is also a type of light water nuclear reactor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">RBMK</span> Type of Soviet nuclear power reactor

The RBMK is a class of graphite-moderated nuclear power reactor designed and built by the Soviet Union. It is somewhat like a boiling water reactor as water boils in the pressure tubes. It is one of two power reactor types to enter serial production in the Soviet Union during the 1970s, the other being the VVER reactor. The name refers to its design where instead of a large steel pressure vessel surrounding the entire core, the core is surrounded by a cylindrical annular steel tank inside a concrete vault and each fuel assembly is enclosed in an individual 8 cm (inner) diameter pipe. The channels also contain the coolant, and are surrounded by graphite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Nuclear and radiation accidents and incidents</span> Severe disruptive events involving fissile or fusile materials

A nuclear and radiation accident is defined by the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) as "an event that has led to significant consequences to people, the environment or the facility." Examples include lethal effects to individuals, large radioactivity release to the environment, or a reactor core melt. The prime example of a "major nuclear accident" is one in which a reactor core is damaged and significant amounts of radioactive isotopes are released, such as in the Chernobyl disaster in 1986 and Fukushima nuclear disaster in 2011.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant</span> Decommissioned nuclear power plant in Ukraine

The Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant (ChNPP) is a nuclear power plant undergoing decommissioning. ChNPP is located near the abandoned city of Pripyat in northern Ukraine, 16.5 kilometers (10 mi) northwest of the city of Chernobyl, 16 kilometers (10 mi) from the Belarus–Ukraine border, and about 100 kilometers (62 mi) north of Kyiv. The plant was cooled by an engineered pond, fed by the Pripyat River about 5 kilometers (3 mi) northwest from its juncture with the Dnieper River.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Browns Ferry Nuclear Plant</span> Nuclear power plant located on Tennessee River, Alabama

The Browns Ferry Nuclear Power Plant is located on the Tennessee River near Decatur and Athens, Alabama, on the north side of Wheeler Lake. The site has three General Electric boiling water reactor (BWR) nuclear generating units and is owned entirely by the Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). With a generating capacity of nearly 3.8 gigawatts, it is the third most powerful nuclear power plant in the United States, behind the Palo Verde Nuclear Power Plant in Arizona and the Vogtle Nuclear Power Plant in Georgia, and the most powerful generating station operated by TVA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station</span> Nuclear power plant in Frenchtown Charter Township, Michigan

The Enrico Fermi Nuclear Generating Station is a nuclear power plant on the shore of Lake Erie near Monroe, in Frenchtown Charter Township, Michigan on approximately 1,000 acres (400 ha). All units of the plant are operated by the DTE Energy Electric Company and owned by parent company DTE Energy. It is approximately halfway between Detroit, Michigan, and Toledo, Ohio. It is also visible from parts of Amherstburg and Colchester, Ontario as well as on the shore of Lake Erie in Ottawa County, Ohio. Two units have been constructed on this site. The first unit's construction started on August 4, 1956 and reached initial criticality on August 23, 1963, and the second unit received its construction permit on September 26, 1972. It reached criticality on June 21, 1985 and was declared commercial on November 18, 1988. The plant is connected to two single-circuit 345 kV Transmission Lines and three 120 kV lines. They are operated and maintained by ITC Transmission.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ringhals Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Sweden

Ringhals is a nuclear power plant in Sweden. It is situated on the Värö Peninsula in Varberg Municipality approximately 65 km south of Gothenburg. With a total power rating of 2,190 MWe, it is the second largest power plant in Sweden. It is owned 70% by Vattenfall and 30% by Uniper SE.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Containment building</span> Structure surrounding a nuclear reactor to prevent radioactive releases

A containment building is a reinforced steel, concrete or lead structure enclosing a nuclear reactor. It is designed, in any emergency, to contain the escape of radioactive steam or gas to a maximum pressure in the range of 275 to 550 kPa. The containment is the fourth and final barrier to radioactive release, the first being the fuel ceramic itself, the second being the metal fuel cladding tubes, the third being the reactor vessel and coolant system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Advanced boiling water reactor</span> Nuclear reactor design

The advanced boiling water reactor (ABWR) is a Generation III boiling water reactor. The ABWR is currently offered by GE Hitachi Nuclear Energy (GEH) and Toshiba. The ABWR generates electrical power by using steam to power a turbine connected to a generator; the steam is boiled from water using heat generated by fission reactions within nuclear fuel. Kashiwazaki-Kariwa unit 6 is considered the first Generation III reactor in the world.

The electricity sector in Sweden has three operational nuclear power plants with 6 operational nuclear reactors, which produce about 29.8% of the country's electricity. The nation's largest power station, Forsmark Nuclear Power Plant, has three reactors producing 3.3 GW and 14% of Sweden's electricity.

R4 nuclear reactor was a nuclear reactor built at Marviken, Vikbolandet and the fourth nuclear reactor built in Sweden. It was heavy water moderated and intended for the dual role of 130 MWe of power generation as well as plutonium production. It had a central role in the Swedish nuclear weapon programme. During the mid 1960s, the social democratic government officially abandoned the project of designing Swedish nuclear weapons and the Marviken plant became derelict. It was never loaded with fuel, and the project was cancelled in 1970.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oskarshamn Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Sweden

The Nuclear power station Oskarshamn is one of three active nuclear power stations in Sweden. The plant is about 30 kilometers (19 mi) north of Oskarshamn, directly at the Kalmarsund at the Baltic Sea coast and with one active reactor, producing about 10% of the electricity needs of Sweden. All reactors were built using BWR technology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ågesta Nuclear Plant</span> Decommissioned nuclear power plant in Sweden

The Ågesta Nuclear Plant was the first Swedish commercial nuclear power plant built by ASEA. Also known as R3 nuclear reactor, it was the third nuclear reactor built in Sweden. Construction started in 1957 and ended in 1962, operations began in 1964 and continued until 1974.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Taishan Nuclear Power Plant</span> Nuclear power plant in Guangdong, China

The Taishan Nuclear Power Plant is a nuclear power plant in Taishan, Guangdong province, China. The plant features two operational EPR reactors. The first unit, Taishan 1, entered commercial service in December 2018, but was shut down from July 2021 to August 2022 to investigate and fix issues with fuel rod cladding. The second unit, Taishan 2, entered commercial service in September 2019. Delays at other EPR construction sites in Finland and France meant that Taishan was the first nuclear power plant to have an operational EPR.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Core catcher</span> Device used to capture fuel debris in a nuclear meltdown

A core catcher is a device provided to catch the molten core material (corium) of a nuclear reactor in case of a nuclear meltdown and prevent it from escaping the containment building.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GE BWR</span> Type of commercial fission reactor

General Electric's BWR product line of boiling water reactors represents the designs of a relatively large (~18%) percentage of the commercial fission reactors around the world.

At its peak in 1982, nuclear power in the Soviet Union accounted for 6.5% of total electricity consumption and the total nuclear capacity installed was 18 GW. However, nuclear power within the Soviet Union declined severely as a result of the 1986 Chernobyl Disaster.

This is a list of all the commercial nuclear reactors in the European Union and in Europe, with operational status. The list only includes civilian nuclear power reactors used to generate electricity for a power grid. All commercial nuclear reactors use nuclear fission. As of May 2021, there are 180 operable power reactors in Europe, with a combined electrical capacity of 159.36 GW. There are currently 8 power reactors under construction in Europe.

References

  1. ↑ "Chernobyl haunts engineer who alerted world". CNN Interactive World News. Cable News Network, Inc. 26 April 1996. Archived from the original on 9 May 2019. Retrieved 28 April 2008.
  2. ↑ "Swedish municipality gives approval for fuel repository". World Nuclear News. 14 October 2020. Archived from the original on 16 October 2020. Retrieved 15 October 2020.
  3. ↑ "Sweden approves the world's first final repository that will store nuclear waste for "100,000 years"". 28 January 2022. Archived from the original on 28 January 2022. Retrieved 28 January 2022.
  4. ↑ Radio Sweden: Investigation into ”serious” fault at power station Archived 2007-03-12 at the Wayback Machine
  5. ↑ Web archive backup: European Atomic Forum: Forsmark incident rated as a Level 2...
  6. ↑ Bakgrund 1-07 "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-08-18. Retrieved 2015-08-10.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  7. ↑ The Local: Nuclear plant 'could have gone into meltdown' Archived 2012-10-01 at the Wayback Machine
  8. ↑ Sveriges Television: SKI: Ingen risk för härdsmälta Archived 2007-02-20 at the Wayback Machine (Swedish)
  9. ↑ Web archive backup: DN Ledare: Strålande nyhet - inget har hänt (Swedish)
  10. ↑ January 30, 2007 Archived October 19, 2012, at the Wayback Machine .
  11. ↑ Web archive backup: SKI: SKI reviews the final disturbance analysis from Forsmark
  12. ↑ Dagens Nyheter, January 14, 2011 http://www.dn.se/nyheter/sverige/expert-det-som-hande-i-japans-reaktorer-kan-handa-ocksa-i-sverige Archived 2013-05-07 at the Wayback Machine
  13. ↑ "Third Swedish nuclear reactor shut down for checks". Reuters. August 9, 2007. Archived from the original on August 25, 2024. Retrieved August 25, 2024.
  14. ↑ Ahlander, Johan (January 17, 2022). "Swedish Security Service investigates drones at three nuclear plants". Reuters . Archived from the original on March 6, 2022. Retrieved March 5, 2022.
  15. ↑ "The antis attack!". Nuclear Engineering International. 5 April 2013. Archived from the original on 18 September 2017. Retrieved 16 July 2014.
  16. 1 2 3 Hall, Adrian M.; Goodfellow, Bradley W.; Heyman, Jakob; Moon, Seulgi; Caffee, Marc W.; Ebert, Karin; Hättestrand, Clas; Krabbendam, Maarten; Martel, Stephen J.; Näslund, Jens-Ove; Perron, Taylor; Stuart, Finlay M.; Stroeven, Arjen P. (2018). "Glacial erosion of the Sub-Cambrian Peneplain in Sweden". Proceedings from the conference held 4–13 April 2018. 20th EGU General Assembly, EGU2018. p. 13835. Bibcode:2018EGUGA..2013835H.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.