Free Software Foundation Europe

Last updated
Free Software Foundation Europe e.V.
AbbreviationFSFE
Formation10 March 2001(23 years ago) (2001-03-10)
Type Charitable organization
Legal status German registered association (eingetragener Verein)
HeadquartersSchönhauser Allee 6/7, Berlin, Germany
Location
Coordinates 52°31′46″N13°24′39″E / 52.52950°N 13.41086°E / 52.52950; 13.41086
Region served
Europe
President
Matthias Kirschner
Vice-President
Heiki Lõhmus
Founding-President
Georg Greve
Former Presidents
Georg Greve, Karsten Gerloff
Main organ
Core Team
Affiliations FSF* network
Budgetc. €600,000
Website fsfe.org
Formerly called
FSF Europe

The Free Software Foundation Europe e.V. (FSFE) is an organization that supports free software and all aspects of the free software movement in Europe, with registered chapters in several European countries. [2] It is a registered voluntary association (German: eingetragener Verein ) incorporated under German law.

Contents

FSFE was founded in 2001. It is the European sister organization of the USbased Free Software Foundation (FSF), although each foundation exists as a separate organization. [3] Following the return of Richard Stallman to the FSF in 2021, the FSFE declared themselves "unable to collaborate" with the FSF. [4] [5]

Goals

FSFE believes that access to (and control of) software determines who may participate in a digital society. Consequently, FSFE believes, the freedoms to use, copy, modify and redistribute software, as described in The Free Software Definition, are necessary for equal participation in the Information Age. [6] The focus of FSFE's work is political, legal, and social, with the aim of promoting free software and the ethical, philosophical, social, political and commercial values that it implements. [7] In particular, it:

Example projects

Official "Public Money? Public Code" campaign video
FSFE representatives at the OpenRheinRuhr, Bottrop, Germany in 2009 2009-11 ORR ESFE.JPG
FSFE representatives at the OpenRheinRuhr, Bottrop, Germany in 2009

Projects undertaken by FSFE include:

Each month, FSFE publishes a newsletter, in multiple languages (including English, French, German, Italian, and Spanish), of their activities that can be mentioned in public. [29]

Structure

From FSFE's published "Self-Conception": [30]

The people of the Free Software Foundation Europe (FSFE), see ourselves as Europeans from different cultures with the shared goal of co-operation across cultures and of developing a common culture of co-operation from a regional to a global level.

We form a non-profit non-governmental organisation and network that itself is part of a global network of people with common goals and visions. We are not representative for anyone but ourselves and our work. Our common work and dedication to freedom in all aspects of digital society is what defines us.

Internally, the FSFE has a consensus-oriented team structure, in which participation is determined by each person's willingness to participate and do work. A democratic and representative-democratic model functions as a fallback when the consensus-based approach accomplishes no results, or when a quick decision is needed.

The FSFE has a modular legal structure with a central "Hub" organization and the possibility of local legal bodies, called "chapters". The Hub is a charitable association ("e.V.") which is registered in Germany.

As well as being in regular contact with other FSFs — Free Software Foundation India (FSFI), Free Software Foundation Latin America (FSFLA) — FSFE has a structure of organizations which are official associates. [31] These are mostly national-level free software groups.

Awards

In 2010, FSFE received the Theodor Heuss Medal in recognition of its work for freedom in the information society. [32] The medal is awarded once a year in Stuttgart by a non-partisan foundation named after West Germany's first president. [33]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free software</span> Software licensed to be freely used, modified and distributed

Free software, libre software, libreware sometimes known as freedom-respecting software is computer software distributed under terms that allow users to run the software for any purpose as well as to study, change, and distribute it and any adapted versions. Free software is a matter of liberty, not price; all users are legally free to do what they want with their copies of a free software regardless of how much is paid to obtain the program. Computer programs are deemed "free" if they give end-users ultimate control over the software and, subsequently, over their devices.

The free software movement is a social movement with the goal of obtaining and guaranteeing certain freedoms for software users, namely the freedoms to run, study, modify, and share copies of software. Software which meets these requirements, The Four Essential Freedoms of Free Software, is termed free software.

The MIT License is a permissive software license originating at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT) in the late 1980s. As a permissive license, it puts very few restrictions on reuse and therefore has high license compatibility.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open-source license</span> Software license allowing source code to be used, modified, and shared

Open-source licenses are software licenses that allow content to be used, modified, and shared. They facilitate free and open-source software (FOSS) development. Intellectual property (IP) laws restrict the modification and sharing of creative works. Free and open-source licenses use these existing legal structures for an inverse purpose. They grant the recipient the rights to use the software, examine the source code, modify it, and distribute the modifications. These criteria are outlined in the Open Source Definition.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open-source software</span> Software licensed to ensure source code usage rights

Open-source software (OSS) is computer software that is released under a license in which the copyright holder grants users the rights to use, study, change, and distribute the software and its source code to anyone and for any purpose. Open-source software may be developed in a collaborative, public manner. Open-source software is a prominent example of open collaboration, meaning any capable user is able to participate online in development, making the number of possible contributors indefinite. The ability to examine the code facilitates public trust in the software.

The Mozilla Public License (MPL) is a free and open-source weak copyleft license for most Mozilla Foundation software such as Firefox and Thunderbird. The MPL is developed and maintained by Mozilla, which seeks to balance the concerns of both open-source and proprietary developers. It is distinguished from others as a middle ground between the permissive software BSD-style licenses and the GNU General Public License. As such, it allows the integration of MPL-licensed code into proprietary codebases, as long as the MPL-licensed components remain accessible under the terms of the MPL.

The Common Development and Distribution License (CDDL) is a free and open-source software license, produced by Sun Microsystems, based on the Mozilla Public License (MPL). Files licensed under the CDDL can be combined with files licensed under other licenses, whether open source or proprietary. In 2005 the Open Source Initiative approved the license. The Free Software Foundation (FSF) considers it a free software license, but one which is incompatible with the GNU General Public License (GPL).

CeCILL is a free software license adapted to both international and French legal matters, in the spirit of and retaining compatibility with the GNU General Public License (GPL).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free and open-source software</span> Software whose source code is available and which is permissively licensed

Free and open-source software (FOSS) is software that is available under an open-source license that grants the right to use, modify, and distribute the software, modified or not, to everyone free of charge. The public availability of the source code is, therefore, a necessary but not sufficient condition. FOSS is also a loosely associated movement of multiple organizations, foundations, communities and individuals who share basic philosophical perspectives and collaborate practically, but might diverge in detail questions. The historical precursor to this was the hobbyist and academic public domain software ecosystem of the 1960s to 1980s. FOSS is an inclusive umbrella term for free software and open-source software. FOSS is in contrast to proprietary software, which consists of software under restrictive copyright or licensing as well as software with undisclosed source code.

Alternative terms for free software, such as open source, FOSS, and FLOSS, have been a recurring issue among free and open-source software users from the late 1990s onwards. These terms share almost identical licence criteria and development practices.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harald Welte</span> German programmer

Harald Welte, also known as LaForge, is a German programmer.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Stallman</span> American free software activist and GNU Project founder (born 1953)

Richard Matthew Stallman, also known by his initials, rms, is an American free software movement activist and programmer. He campaigns for software to be distributed in such a manner that its users have the freedom to use, study, distribute, and modify that software. Software which ensures these freedoms is termed free software. Stallman launched the GNU Project, founded the Free Software Foundation (FSF) in October 1985, developed the GNU Compiler Collection and GNU Emacs, and wrote all versions of the GNU General Public License.

The IBM Public License (IPL) is a free open-source software license written and occasionally used by IBM. It is approved by the Free Software Foundation (FSF) and described as an "open-source license" by the Open Source Initiative.

This comparison only covers software licenses which have a linked Wikipedia article for details and which are approved by at least one of the following expert groups: the Free Software Foundation, the Open Source Initiative, the Debian Project and the Fedora Project. For a list of licenses not specifically intended for software, see List of free-content licences.

Opposition to software patents is widespread in the free software community. In response, various mechanisms have been tried to defuse the perceived problem.

A Contributor License Agreement (CLA) defines the terms under which intellectual property has been contributed to a company/project, typically software under an open source license.

Software companies focusing on the development of open-source software (OSS) employ a variety of business models to solve the challenge of making profits from software that is under an open-source license. Each of these business strategies rest on the premise that users of open-source technologies are willing to purchase additional software features under proprietary licenses, or purchase other services or elements of value that complement the open-source software that is core to the business. This additional value can be, but not limited to, enterprise-grade features and up-time guarantees to satisfy business or compliance requirements, performance and efficiency gains by features not yet available in the open source version, legal protection, or professional support/training/consulting that are typical of proprietary software applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free-software license</span> License allowing software modification and redistribution

A free-software license is a notice that grants the recipient of a piece of software extensive rights to modify and redistribute that software. These actions are usually prohibited by copyright law, but the rights-holder of a piece of software can remove these restrictions by accompanying the software with a software license which grants the recipient these rights. Software using such a license is free software as conferred by the copyright holder. Free-software licenses are applied to software in source code and also binary object-code form, as the copyright law recognizes both forms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GNU General Public License</span> Series of free software licenses

The GNU General Public Licenses are a series of widely used free software licenses, or copyleft licenses, that guarantee end users the freedoms to run, study, share, or modify the software. The GPL was the first copyleft license available for general use. It was originally written by Richard Stallman, the founder of the Free Software Foundation (FSF), for the GNU Project. The license grants the recipients of a computer program the rights of the Free Software Definition. The licenses in the GPL series are all copyleft licenses, which means that any derivative work must be distributed under the same or equivalent license terms. It is more restrictive than the Lesser General Public License, and even further distinct from the more widely-used permissive software licenses such as BSD, MIT, and Apache.

The Free Software Foundation (FSF) is a 501(c)(3) non-profit organization founded by Richard Stallman on October 4, 1985. The organisation supports the free software movement, with the organization's preference for software being distributed under copyleft terms, such as with its own GNU General Public License. The FSF was incorporated in Boston, Massachusetts, United States, where it is also based.

References

  1. "Imprint". fsfe.org. Free Software Foundation Europe e.V. (FSFE). Retrieved 15 June 2015. Hamburg is the registered address of the legal entity.
  2. "FSFE's legal structure" . Retrieved 20 January 2012.
  3. "The FSF* network". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved 2019-11-26.
  4. "The FSF* network". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  5. "Statement on Richard Stallman rejoining the FSF board - FSFE". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved 2023-02-07.
  6. "Promoting innovation and growth through Horizon 2020" . Retrieved 24 August 2020.
  7. "About Free Software Foundation Europe". Fsfe.org. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
  8. "Public Money? Public Code! - FSFE". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  9. "Public Money? Public Code! 31 organisations ask to improve public procurement of software". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  10. 1 2 3 4 (FSFE), Free Software Foundation Europe. "Public Money, Public Code". publiccode.eu. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  11. "Sign the Petition: Public Money Should Produce Public Code - Creative Commons". Creative Commons. 2017-09-18. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  12. "Public Money? Public Code! 22 Organizations Seek to Improve Public Software Procurement | Open Source Initiative". opensource.org. Archived from the original on 2020-02-16. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  13. Malcolm, Jeremy (2017-10-24). "Public Money, Public Code: Show Your Support For Free Software in Europe". Electronic Frontier Foundation. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  14. "Public Money? Public Code! - EDRi". EDRi. 2017-09-13. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  15. "L'April rejoint 30 autres organisations pour la campagne " Argent public ? Code Public ! " | April". www.april.org (in French). Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  16. "CCC | Open Letter: Public Money? Public Code!". www.ccc.de. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  17. "Pressemitteilungen/PM 09 13 Public Money Public Code – Wikimedia Deutschland". wikimedia.de (in German). Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  18. "Are Governments Held Hostage? Why openSUSE Supports Public Money Public Code". openSUSE News. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  19. "Edward Snowden on Twitter". Twitter. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  20. "Public Money? Public Code! 31 organisations ask to improve public procurement of software". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  21. Albers, Erik. "Using Free Software to build a more democratic, inclusive and sustainable digital society - interview with Francesca Bria, CTO of Barcelona". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved 2018-07-31.
  22. "FSFE - Software Patents in Europe". Fsfeurope.org. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
  23. "FSFE and the antitrust case against Microsoft". Fsfeurope.org. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
  24. "FSFE - Observing the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)". Fsfeurope.org. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
  25. "FSFE Legal - The Freedom Task Force". fsfe.org. Retrieved 7 September 2015.
  26. "Fiduciary Licence Agreement (FLA) - FSFE Legal". FSFE - Free Software Foundation Europe. Retrieved 2018-04-17.
  27. "REUSE website".
  28. "SPDX for KF5/KF6 Status Update".
  29. "FSFE Newsletter".
  30. "FSFE's Self-Conception". Archived from the original on 2009-02-14. Retrieved 2004-12-21.
  31. "Associate Organisations - FSFE". Fsfeurope.org. Archived from the original on 16 February 2020. Retrieved 19 July 2014.
  32. "FSFE Receives Theodor Heuss Medal » Linux Magazine". Linux Magazine. 2010-01-06. Retrieved 2022-11-09.
  33. "Free Software Foundation Europe receives Theodor Heuss Medal". 10 May 2010.