Land grants in New Mexico and Colorado

Last updated

Land grants in New Mexico and Colorado were awarded to individuals and communities by the Spanish and Mexican governments to encourage settlement and expansion of the Territorio de Nuevo Mexico, which included southern Colorado. Land grants by the Spanish and Mexicans between 1692 and 1846 numbered 291 in New Mexico, four partly in New Mexico and partly in Colorado, and three in Colorado. The land area of grants totaled tens of thousands of square miles. "The two major types of land grants were private grants made to individuals, and communal grants made to groups of people for the purpose of establishing settlements. Communal land grants were also made to Pueblos for the lands they inhabited." [1] The majority of the land area within grants was designated as common land for residents. Common land was mostly used for grazing cattle and sheep. Smaller acreages within the grants were devoted to irrigation agriculture and home sites. The principal objectives of the land grants were to encourage the foundation of new communities and to expand the settled area on the frontiers of New Mexico for defense from Indian raids.

Contents

After its conquest of New Mexico in 1846, the United States adjudicated the grants and confirmed 157 as valid. The peace treaty between the U.S. and Mexico in 1848 guaranteed the right of former Mexican citizens to their land, but the adherence to that language was inconsistent and often compromised by U.S.legal actions biased in favor of Anglo claimants and Anglo land practices. Hispanic protests, legal action, and occasional violence to regain or retain their traditional rights to usage of grant lands continued into the 21st century.

History during the colonial period

Context map showing the Mexican state of Nuevo Mexico in much of the first decade after Mexican Independence (map represents territorial extent from November 1824 to 1830). Mexico 1824-11-24 to 1830.png
Context map showing the Mexican state of Nuevo México in much of the first decade after Mexican Independence (map represents territorial extent from November 1824 to 1830).
Rand McNally's 1897 map of New Mexico showing land grants recognized by the U.S.(red), not recognized (green), and some of the Indian reservations in the state (yellow). RandMcNallyNew Mexico 1897.jpg
Rand McNally's 1897 map of New Mexico showing land grants recognized by the U.S.(red), not recognized (green), and some of the Indian reservations in the state (yellow).

Juan de Oñate established a Spanish colony in New Mexico in 1598. The initial settlement comprised more than 500 soldiers and settlers, including at least 129 men of fighting age, ten Franciscan missionaries, and more than 7,000 head of livestock. New Mexico was at the time 600 miles (970 km) north of the nearest Spanish settlement of Santa Bárbara, Chihuahua. The remoteness of New Mexico from the seat of government in Mexico remained a characteristic of the settlement during the next two and one-half centuries. [2] [3]

In 1598, about 50,000 Puebloans inhabited the valley of the Rio Grande River and its tributaries in New Mexico. They were sedentary agricultural people living in about 60 villages, mostly near sources of irrigation water. Their numbers decreased to about 16,500 by 1680. The decline was due to war, Spanish exploitation, and epidemics of diseases with European origins. Surrounding the New Mexico colony of Spanish settlers and Pueblo peoples were nomadic and semi-nomadic Indians: Apaches to the east, Navajo to the west, and Ute to the north. [4]

In the early years of the colony, Spanish governors rewarded their supporters and soldiers in New Mexico with encomiendas which gave the grantee the right to exploit Pueblo labor and extract tribute, but did not give the grantee legal ownership of the land itself. The encomienda system was one of the grievances which led to the Pueblo revolt (1680-1692) and the expulsion of the Spanish from New Mexico by the Pueblos. After the Spanish reconquered New Mexico in 1692-1693, their land policies became more conciliatory. They did not attempt to reimpose the encomienda system but rather made grants of land to communities (including Pueblo villages) and individuals. [5] Subsequently, the Spanish and their Pueblo subjects were forced into becoming allies due to raids, often retaliatory, by the surrounding Indian tribes, especially the Comanche who after 1706 became a major threat to the New Mexican colony. In 1821, Mexico (including the province of New Mexico) attained independence from Spain. The government of New Mexico continued to make grants to individuals and communities until Mexico became a possession of the United States after the Mexican–American War (1846-1848). [6] [7]

Grants

From 1692 to 1848, the Spanish and Mexican governments awarded land grants to individuals, communities, and Pueblo villages. The U.S. recognized for adjudication 295 grants in New Mexico, four of which extended into southern Colorado, and three grants entirely in southern Colorado. The land grants later judged by the U.S. to be legal ranged in size from 200 acres (81 ha) for Cañada Ancha (now a suburb of Santa Fe) to 1,714,765 acres (6,939.41 km2) for the Maxwell Land Grant on the eastern slope of the Sangre de Cristo Mountains extending northward into Colorado. Although the terms of each grant varied they fell into two broad categories: grants to communities and to individuals. Community grants included those made to Pueblo villages. The procedure for attaining a grant was for communities or individuals to submit petitions to the Governor of New Mexico who after investigation and consultation with local authorities approved the grant. The boundaries of a grant were often vague, "a river, a ridge, an arroyo," etc. [8] [9] [10] [11]

Between 1854 and 1904 the U.S. government adjudicated and "confirmed" (recognized the validity of) 154 of the grants in New Mexico and three in Colorado. Forty-seven New Mexican grants were to individuals, 84 were grants to communities, and 23 were grants to Pueblo villages. Confirmed grants in the state originally comprised about 12,000 sq mi (31,000 km2) of land of which 98 percent was lost to the original owners and their descendants during and since the adjudication period. As of 2015, about 35 of the community grants in New Mexico continued to function, had boards of trustees, and owned in common about 200,000 acres (810 km2) of land. [12] [11]

Grants had varying terms and conditions in their charters, but can be roughly divided into land grants given to communities and to individuals. Individual grants were more common in the 18th century and community grants in the 19th century. [13]

Grants to communities

Community grants were made to groups of settlers. Each settler received a house site and an irrigatable plot for agriculture. Most of the land, however, was held in common for all members of the community. Uses made of the common land included pastures for livestock, water, timber, firewood, hunting, fishing, foraging, and rock quarrying. Settlers owned their house sites and agricultural plots after four years of residence. The settler could sell his land and house, but the common property could not be sold. The primary economic activities of the settlers were subsistence agriculture and raising sheep or cattle. Many of the community grants were made for the purpose of defending the New Mexican frontier from Indian raids. After a durable peace with the Comanche was negotiated in 1786, settlement of frontier areas accelerated. [14]

Grants to Pueblos

Spanish community grants to Pueblo villages dated as early as the 1690s and grants were made to 23 villages. [15] The usual practice was for the Spanish to grant ownership of land in common to the residents of a pueblo. The standard size of a Pueblo land grant was one league in each cardinal direction from the church on the central plaza in the Pueblo. The acreage of each grant was, thus, four square leagues, later determined to be 17,712 acres (7,168 ha). A buffer area around the Pueblo land prohibited outsiders from grazing their livestock and growing crops. Nevertheless, encroachments on Pueblo land occurred. The sale of grant lands to non-Pueblos was permitted, but with restrictions. [16]

When the United States acquired New Mexico, it initially regarded the Pueblos as full citizens and not entitled to any special protection. Encroachment on and sales of Pueblo land continued into the 20th century. In a series of decisions in the early 20th century, the U.S. reversed course and asserted legal guardianship of Pueblo land and forbade Pueblo peoples from selling land without Congressional permission. Legal disputes concerning land ownership and the respective rights and obligations of the Pueblos and the U.S. government continued into the 21st century. [17]

Grants to individuals

The Spanish and Mexicans also granted land to individuals -- or in some cases two people -- as private property. The grantee could do as he wished with the land after the terms of the grant were met. In the case of some grants, such as the Sangre de Cristo Land Grant in southern Colorado, the individual grant functioned similar to a community grant. The grantee recruited settlers by providing them with tracts of land for agriculture and homes and access to common lands. [10] [13]

During the last years of Mexican rule, the New Mexican governor made several large individual grants to reward supporters and cronies, bolster possession of land on the periphery of New Mexico, and counter growing U.S. influence, including fear of invasion of New Mexico by either the U.S. or Texas which was independent from 1836-1845. [18]

U.S. rule

New Mexico in 1850 had a population of 56,223 [19] mostly Spanish-speaking Hispanics and detribalized American Indians ("genizaros"), and including about 10,000 Puebloans. A salient fact is that it was an austere land in which sources of potential wealth were scarce -- with the exception of land and mining in some areas -- for an increasing population of Anglo-Americans and ambitious Hispanics. Ownership of land was the vehicle for wealth and prominence in the American territory of New Mexico (1848-1912). [20] [21]

The United States agreed in the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo (1848) that all residents of former Mexican territory had the right of "retaining the property which they possess in the said territories, or disposing thereof, and removing the proceeds wherever they please." The history in New Mexico and southern Colorado of land grants since the treaty consists of attempts to reconcile U.S. land laws with those of Mexico and adjudicating disputes between grant owners and claimants and the largely Anglo new arrivals to the territory and state. These disputes have continued into the 21st century. In the legal controversies about land grants and their owners, millions of acres of land have ended up as the property of wealthy Anglos or in the public domain, mostly as National Forests, of the United States. [22] [23]

In 1854, the U.S. established the Office of the Surveyor General for New Mexico to investigate land grants and recommend their disposition to the U.S. Congress. Claimants of land grants had to petition the Surveyor General to confirm their grant, but the claimants often did not speak English and were suspicious of and unfamiliar with the American legal system -- so different from the Hispanic. Many of the claimants were poor and unable to pursue the lengthy and expensive legal process of getting a claim confirmed. Moreover, the first and succeeding Surveyors General had little knowledge of Hispanic land practices and customs. "The situation was ripe for fraud." [22] [24] The results were "large grants owned by speculators were erroneously confirmed; other grants which should have been confirmed were not...[and]...some valid grants were confirmed, but to the wrong people." The notorious Santa Fe Ring of lawyers and politicians, often in league with the Surveyors General, abused the adjudication system. [25]

The shortcomings of the Office of Surveyor General resulted in the creation by the U.S. government of the Court of Private Land Claims in 1891 which established an adversarial system in which a panel of five judges decided land grant disputes. However, the attorney's office representing the United States had far greater legal resources than the claimants. In 1897, the U.S. Supreme Court made a ruling which also disadvantaged claimants. Title to the common lands of Spanish and Mexican land grants, the court decided, was held by the sovereign, i.e. the government of the United States. The consequences of losing access to resources on former common lands were severe for many Hispanic settlements. The small garden plots individuals and families retained were inadequate for their subsistence. [26]

Hispanics resisted the land policies of the United States. Among the movements and events at least partially related to land disputes were the Taos Revolt (1847), which saw the murder of several large land grantees. Attempts to expel both Hispanic and Anglo settlers from the Maxwell Land Grant resulted in violent resistance from 1866 until 1899. Causes of the famous Lincoln County War (late 1860s to 1881), involving, among others, Billy the Kid; and the Colfax County War (1873-1888) included land disputes. Las Gorras Blancas (the White Caps) in San Miguel County from the 1880s until the 1920s cut pasture fences and committed several violent acts. The shadowy La Mano Negra (the Black Hand) flourished in Rio Arriba County in the 1920s and 1930s to protest Anglo ownership of the former common lands of the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant. [27]

In 1967, the Alianza Federal de Mercedes, led by Reies Tijerina, raided the Rio Arriba County Courthouse. The objective was to make a citizen's arrest of the district attorney "to bring attention to the unscrupulous means by which government and Anglo settlers had usurped Hispanic land grant properties." An armed struggle resulted in which two persons were wounded and Tijerina was arrested and sentenced to prison. [28] In 2014, also in Rio Arriba County, the Forest Service was accused of using "Gestapo-like tactics" to prevent local residents from accessing the National Forest for traditional uses such as grazing livestock. [29]

In Colorado in 2021, a judge settled a long-running dispute in which descendants of settlers on the Sangre de Cristo Land Grant sued for access to the former common lands of the grant (the property of an Anglo rancher) by deciding in favor of the descendants. [30]

Notable land grants in New Mexico and Colorado

The following list of notable land grants in New Mexico and Colorado highlights some of the issues and controversies associated with land grants.

See also

Notes

  1. "Land Grants". webarchive. New Mexico Commission of Public Records. November 28, 2011. Archived from the original on 2011-11-28.
  2. Simmons, Marc (1991). The Last Conquistador. Norman: University of Oklahoma Press. pp. 96, 111. ISBN   0806123680.
  3. Kessell, John L. "Chapter Three: Onate's Disenchantment, 1595-1597". National Park Service. Retrieved 1 May 2023.
  4. Riley, Carroll L. (1987). The Frontier People. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. pp. 12, 230–232. ISBN   0826309984.
  5. Ebright, Malcolm (1987). New Mexican Land Grants: The Legal Background. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. p. 21. Chapter One in Land, Water, and Culture, edited by Charles L. Briggs and John R. Van Ness. ISBN   0826309895.
  6. Ebright 1987, pp. 21–26.
  7. "Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo". General Accounting Office. 2001. p. 3-4,17. Retrieved 5 May 2023.
  8. Ebright 1987, pp. 21–23.
  9. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo 2001, pp. 3, 22–28.
  10. 1 2 "Sangre de Cristo Land Grant". Colorado Encyclopedia. 2 December 2021. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  11. 1 2 "Mexican Land Grants in Colorado". Colorado Encyclopedia. 6 July 2020. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  12. Garcia y Griego, L. M. "Community Land Grants in New Mexico: some background" (PDF). New Mexico Legislature. UNM Land Grant Studies Program. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  13. 1 2 Ebright 1987, p. 23.
  14. Ebright 1987, pp. 23–25.
  15. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo 2001, p. 17.
  16. Lucero, Robert L. Jr. (2007). "State v. Romero: The Legacy of Pueblo Land Grants and the Contours of Jurisdiction of Indian County". New Mexico Law Review. 37 (3/8): 675. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  17. Lucero 2007, pp. 675–679.
  18. Lamar, Howard R. (December 1962). "Land Policy in the Spanish Southwest: 1846-1891". The Journal of Economic History. 22 (4): 498–501. doi:10.1017/S0022050700066717. S2CID   154377195 . Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  19. Darling, J. Andrew and Eiselt, B. Sunday (nd), from New Mexico and the Pimeria Alta, eds. John G. Douglass and William M. Graves, Boulder: University Press of Colorado, p. 192,
  20. Lamar 1962, p. 503.
  21. Gonzales, Phillip (Spring 2003). "Struggle for Survival: The Hispanic Land Grants of New Mexico, 1848-2001". Agricultural History. 77 (2): 298–301. doi:10.1215/00021482-77.2.293. JSTOR   3744837. S2CID   247881369 . Retrieved 15 March 2023.
  22. 1 2 3 "History: Land Grants". Albuquerque Historical Society. Retrieved 14 May 2023.
  23. Raish, Carol; McSweeney, Alice M. (Fall 2008). "Land Grants and the U.S. Forest Service". Natural Resources Journal. 48 (4): 1039. JSTOR   24889589 . Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  24. Lamar 1962, pp. 502–504.
  25. Gomez, Placido (1985). "The History and Adjudication of the Common Lands of Spanish and Mexican Land Grants". Natural Resources Journal. 25 (4): 1039, 1070–1071. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  26. Gomez 1985, pp. 1057–1058, 1072–1076.
  27. Rosenbaum, Robert J. and Larson, Robert W. (1987), "Mexicano Resistance to the Expropriation of Grant Lands," in Land Water and Culture," eds. Charles L. Briggs and John R. Van Ness, Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press, pages 278-297
  28. Pike, Douglas (2004). Roadside New Mexico. Albuquerque: University of New Mexico Press. pp. 81–82. ISBN   9780826355690.
  29. Oswald, Mark. "El Norte: A New Mexico Mess -- Land Grants, Rodella and the Feds". Albuquerque Journal. Retrieved 15 May 2023.
  30. Perdoni, Kate (September 30, 2021). "Plaintiffs in Costilla County land rights hearing describe a 'campaign of harassment' Facebook shareTwitter shareEmail share". Rocky Mountain PBS.
  31. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo 2001, p. 22.
  32. Houghton, Kristopher N. (Winter 2008). "The Blighted History of the Alameda Land Grant: Motoya v. Unknown Heirs of Virgin". Natural Resources Journal. 48: 985–1006.
  33. Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo 2001, pp. 9, 22.
  34. 1 2 Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo 2001, p. 23.
  35. Holladay, Denise (2009). "Elena Gallegos Land Grant". New Mexico Office of the State Historian. Retrieved 6 February 2010.
  36. Abel, Ann (August 23, 2016). "Big House on the Prairie: Inside Ted Turner's Luxurious Casa Grande on His Vermejo Park Ranch". Forbes. Retrieved 2021-02-10.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">San Luis, Colorado</span> Town in Colorado, United States

San Luis is a statutory town that is the county seat and the most populous town of Costilla County, Colorado, United States. Formerly known as San Luis de la Culebra, it is the oldest continuously occupied town in Colorado. The population was 598 at the 2020 census.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo</span> 1848 agreement ending the Mexican–American War

The Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo officially ended the Mexican–American War (1846–1848). It was signed on 2 February 1848 in the town of Guadalupe Hidalgo.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Reies Tijerina</span> American activist (1926–2015)

Reies López Tijerina, was an activist who led a struggle in the 1960s and 1970s to restore New Mexican land grants to the descendants of their Spanish colonial and Mexican owners. As a vocal spokesman for the rights of Hispanos and Mexican Americans, he became a major figure of the early Chicano Movement and founded the Alianza Federal de Mercedes. As an activist, he worked in community education and organization, media relations, and land reclamations. He became famous and infamous internationally for his 1967 armed raid on the Tierra Amarilla courthouse located on the Tierra Amarilla Land Grant whose lands, originally designated for Hispanic settlers, had largely been acquired by Anglo ranchers and land developers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Californios</span> Term for Hispanic natives of California

Californios are Hispanic Californians, especially those descended from Spanish and Mexican settlers of the 17th through 19th centuries. California's Spanish-speaking community has resided there since 1683 and is made up of varying Spanish and Mexican origins, including criollos, Mestizos, Indigenous Californian peoples, and small numbers of Mulatos. Alongside the Tejanos of Texas and Neomexicanos of New Mexico and Colorado, Californios are part of the larger Spanish-American/Mexican-American/Hispano community of the United States, which has inhabited the American Southwest and the West Coast since the 16th century. Some may also identify as Chicanos, a term that came about in the 1960s.

The history of New Mexico is based on archaeological evidence, attesting to the varying cultures of humans occupying the area of New Mexico since approximately 9200 BCE, and written records. The earliest peoples had migrated from northern areas of North America after leaving Siberia via the Bering Land Bridge. Artifacts and architecture demonstrate ancient complex cultures in this region.

The Atrisco Land Grant (merced) of 1692 is one among many Spanish land grants in New Mexico. It is in the Atrisco Valley south of Albuquerque, New Mexico. The grant was established during the New World expansion of the Spanish Empire, as part of the Viceroyalty of New Spain.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States Court of Private Land Claims</span> Court created to resolve land claims in the western U.S. (1891–1904)

The United States Court of Private Land Claims (1891–1904) was an ad-hoc court created to decide land claims guaranteed by the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, in the territories of New Mexico, Arizona, and Utah, and in the states of Nevada, Colorado, and Wyoming.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ranchos of California</span> Land concessions by Spain and land grants by Mexico in the 18th and 19th centuries in California

The Spanish and Mexican governments made many concessions and land grants in Alta California and Baja California from 1775 to 1846. The Spanish Concessions of land were made to retired soldiers as an inducement for them to settle in the frontier. These Concessions reverted to the Spanish crown upon the death of the recipient.

The California Land Act of 1851, enacted following the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo and the admission of California as a state in 1850, established a three-member Public Land Commission to determine the validity of prior Spanish and Mexican land grants. It required landowners who claimed title under the Mexican government to file their claim with a commission within two years. Contrary to the Treaty of Guadalupe Hidalgo, which guaranteed full protection of all property rights for Mexican citizens, it placed the burden on landholders to prove their title.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maxwell Land Grant</span>

The Maxwell Land Grant, also known as the Beaubien-Miranda Land Grant, was a 1,714,765-acre (6,939.41 km2) Mexican land grant in Colfax County, New Mexico, and part of adjoining Las Animas County, Colorado. This 1841 land grant was one of the largest contiguous private landholdings in the history of the United States. The New Mexico communities of Cimarron, Dawson, Elizabethtown, Baldy Town, Maxwell, Miami, Raton, Rayado, Springer, Ute Park and Vermejo Park came to be located within the grant, as well as numerous places that are now ghost towns.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Santa Fe Ring</span> Criminal organization in New Mexico Territory

The Santa Fe Ring was an informal group of powerful politicians, attorneys, and land speculators in territorial New Mexico from 1865 until 1912. The Ring was composed of newly-arrived Anglo Americans and opportunistic Hispanics from long-resident and prominent families in New Mexico. Acquiring wealth, both groups realized, lay in owning or controlling the millions of acres of land which the Spanish and Mexican governments of New Mexico had granted to individuals and communities. The acquisition of grant lands by members of the Santa Fe Ring was facilitated by U.S. courts unfamiliar and unsympathetic to Hispanic land practices which featured allocating most of the land in grants to the common ownership of the first settlers and their descendants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rancho Las Vírgenes</span> Historic land grant in Southern California, United States

Rancho Las Vírgenes was a 17,760-acre (71.9 km2) land grant in the Santa Monica Mountains and Simi Hills, in present day western Los Angeles County, California. The lands of the Rancho Las Vírgenes included present day Agoura Hills, Oak Park, and Westlake Village and part of the Santa Monica Mountains.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tierra Amarilla Land Grant</span> Place in the United States

The Tierra Amarilla Land Grant in northern New Mexico and southern Colorado consists of 594,516 acres (2,405.92 km2) of mountainous land. The government of New Mexico awarded it to Manuel Martinez and his offspring in 1832. The grant was settled by Hispanics in the 1860s and the original inhabitants, the Ute Indians, were induced to leave. Settlers were given small plots, but most of the land in the grant area was designated as common land for the use of all the settlers and their descendants. After its conquest of New Mexico in 1846, the United States government upheld the validity of the grant, but subsequent actions by the U.S. did not protect the right to access common lands by the settlers. Politician and land speculator Thomas Catron, a member of the Santa Fe Ring, acquired nearly all the land by 1883 but later sold it to a development company. Access to the common lands of the grant by the Hispanic settlers and their descendants gradually disappeared as the common land became owned by Anglo ranchers, development companies, and speculators.

Aboriginal land title in New Mexico is unique among aboriginal title in the United States. Congressional legislation was passed to define such title after the United States acquired this territory following war with Mexico (1846–1848). But the Supreme Court of the New Mexico Territory and the United States Supreme Court held that the Nonintercourse Act did not restrict the alienability of Pueblo lands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">San Miguel del Vado Land Grant</span>

The San Miguel del Vado Land Grant is one of the Spanish land grants in New Mexico. On November 24, 1794, 53 men submitted a petition for land and were granted temporary possession on November 24, 1794, pending satisfaction of prescribed criteria. A second grant was obtained by 58 men and their respective families on March 12, 1803. Two days later, the procedure was repeated at San José del Vado, 6 kilometres (3.7 mi) north of San Miguel del Vado, distributing farm land to an additional 47 heads of household, including two women.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">El Cerrito, New Mexico</span> Village in New Mexico, United States

El Cerrito is a village in San Miguel County, New Mexico, United States. The village is located in the upper Pecos River valley and was founded in 1824 by settlers from Villanueva, 5 kilometres (3.1 mi) upstream. The majority of the population is Hispanic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mexican secularization act of 1833</span> Legislation concerning the separation of church and state

The Mexican Secularization Act of 1833, officially called the Decree for the Secularization of the Missions of California, was an act passed by the Congress of the Union of the First Mexican Republic which secularized the Californian missions. The act nationalized the missions, transferring their ownership from the Franciscan Order of the Catholic Church to the Mexican authorities.

The Sangre de Cristo Land Grant in the San Luis Valley of southern Colorado and northern New Mexico consists of 1,000,000 acres (4,000 km2) of mostly arid land. It was awarded by the government of New Mexico to the Beaubien family in 1843. The land grant was originally settled by Hispanics from New Mexico. Since the incorporation of the area of the grant into the United States in 1848, legal disputes between the descendants of the Hispanic settlers and Anglo ranchers about ownership of and access to some of the land in the grant area have been frequent and continued into the 21st century.

Shirley Romero Otero is a Chicana activist who co-founded the Land Rights Council in 1977 to regain the rights for heirs of the Sangre de Cristo Land Grant. She is an educator and leader in the San Luis Valley region. She is the director of the Move Mountains Youth Project and sits on the board of directors of the Acequia Institute.