This is a list of counties of Kenya by poverty rate as of 2015. The international poverty rate used by the World Bank is used in the following list. The estimates can therefore differ from other estimates, like the national poverty rate. Poverty is a significant problem in Kenya. According to estimates by Oxfam, the richest 0.1 percent in Kenya own more wealth than the bottom 99.9%. [1] Around 40 percent of the population still lived in extreme poverty in 2021. [2]
Percent of population living on less than $2.15, $3.65 and $6.85 a day, international dollars (2017 PPP) as per the World Bank. [3]
County | $2.15 | $3.65 | $6.85 | Year of estimate |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samburu | 72.9% | 87.6% | 95.7% | 2015 |
Turkana | 68.7% | 83.6% | 92.5% | 2015 |
Mandera | 64.0% | 88.4% | 97.8% | 2015 |
Busia | 63.0% | 89.4% | 97.6% | 2015 |
West Pokot | 59.0% | 87.3% | 99.0% | 2015 |
Bomet | 55.0% | 89.5% | 98.1% | 2015 |
Marsabit | 50.8% | 80.0% | 95.0% | 2015 |
Garissa | 46.3% | 77.9% | 95.1% | 2015 |
Kisii | 45.8% | 81.3% | 95.1% | 2015 |
Tana River | 43.2% | 74.1% | 93.1% | 2015 |
Laikipia | 42.2% | 71.6% | 89.5% | 2015 |
Kitui | 41.2% | 72.4% | 94.2% | 2015 |
Wajir | 40.0% | 84.4% | 98.5% | 2015 |
Elgeyo-Marakwet | 38.9% | 75.4% | 92.5% | 2015 |
Migori | 38.0% | 78.2% | 96.7% | 2015 |
Bungoma | 36.5% | 75.1% | 94.7% | 2015 |
Kwale | 35.9% | 68.0% | 90.6% | 2015 |
Trans-Nzoia | 35.3% | 67.0% | 90.6% | 2015 |
Kakamega | 34.7% | 74.4% | 93.8% | 2015 |
Kilifi | 34.4% | 63.1% | 83.2% | 2015 |
Nandi | 34.1% | 69.7% | 95.9% | 2015 |
Uasin Gishu | 34.1% | 59.8% | 89.0% | 2015 |
Baringo | 33.3% | 63.9% | 89.7% | 2015 |
Siaya | 31.0% | 68.6% | 92.4% | 2015 |
Homa Bay | 30.5% | 65.0% | 93.9% | 2015 |
Nyandarua | 30.4% | 64.6% | 90.1% | 2015 |
Vihiga | 28.8% | 71.7% | 94.1% | 2015 |
Nyamira | 28.8% | 64.8% | 91.8% | 2015 |
Kajiado | 27.9% | 50.7% | 77.0% | 2015 |
Makueni | 26.6% | 58.2% | 89.5% | 2015 |
Nakuru | 26.0% | 56.9% | 84.6% | 2015 |
Narok | 25.0% | 51.6% | 86.3% | 2015 |
Kericho | 23.9% | 65.9% | 91.6% | 2015 |
Embu | 23.9% | 56.4% | 87.6% | 2015 |
Murang'a | 23.5% | 60.4% | 88.3% | 2015 |
Kenya | 23.4% | 59.6% | 85.7% | 2015 |
Isiolo | 23.1% | 66.0% | 90.2% | 2015 |
Taita-Taveta | 22.3% | 57.9% | 82.8% | 2015 |
Lamu | 22.3% | 49.6% | 84.5% | 2015 |
Kisumu | 19.2% | 51.7% | 85.0% | 2015 |
Meru | 17.8% | 55.6% | 87.8% | 2015 |
Tharaka-Nithi | 17.1% | 54.3% | 86.2% | 2015 |
Machakos | 15.2% | 41.6% | 76.7% | 2015 |
Kirinyaga | 15.0% | 49.8% | 84.7% | 2015 |
Kiambu | 13.3% | 37.1% | 77.6% | 2015 |
Nyeri | 10.5% | 42.1% | 76.4% | 2015 |
Mombasa | 7.7% | 27.7% | 63.4% | 2015 |
Nairobi City | 2.3% | 17.0% | 57.3% | 2015 |
Extreme poverty is the most severe type of poverty, defined by the United Nations (UN) as "a condition characterized by severe deprivation of basic human needs, including food, safe drinking water, sanitation facilities, health, shelter, education and information. It depends not only on income but also on access to services". Historically, other definitions have been proposed within the United Nations.
Poverty is a state or condition in which an individual lacks the financial resources and essentials for a basic standard of living. Poverty can have diverse environmental, legal, social, economic, and political causes and effects. When evaluating poverty in statistics or economics there are two main measures: absolute poverty which compares income against the amount needed to meet basic personal needs, such as food, clothing, and shelter; secondly, relative poverty measures when a person cannot meet a minimum level of living standards, compared to others in the same time and place. The definition of relative poverty varies from one country to another, or from one society to another.
Poverty in Australia refers to the incidence of relative poverty in Australia and its measurement. Relative income poverty is measured as the percentage of the population that earns less than the median wage of the working population.
Poverty in India remains a major challenge despite overall reductions in the last several decades as its economy grows. According to an International Monetary Fund paper, extreme poverty, defined by the World Bank as living on US$1.9 or less in purchasing power parity (PPP) terms, in India was as low as 0.8% in 2019, and the country managed to keep it at that level in 2020 despite the unprecedented COVID-19 outbreak. According to the World Bank, India experienced a significant decline in the prevalence of extreme poverty from 22.5% in 2011 to 10.2% in 2019. A working paper of the bank said rural poverty declined from 26.3% in 2011 to 11.6% in 2019. The decline in urban areas was from 14.2% to 6.3% in the same period. The poverty level in rural and urban areas went down by 14.7 and 7.9 percentage points, respectively. According to United Nations Development Programme administrator Achim Steiner, India lifted 271 million people out of extreme poverty in a 10-year time period from 2005–2006 to 2015–2016. A 2020 study from the World Economic Forum found "Some 220 million Indians sustained on an expenditure level of less than Rs 32 / day—the poverty line for rural India—by the last headcount of the poor in India in 2013."
Poverty is measured in different ways by different bodies, both governmental and nongovernmental. Measurements can be absolute, which references a single standard, or relative, which is dependent on context. Poverty is widely understood to be multidimensional, comprising social, natural and economic factors situated within wider socio-political processes.
Poverty in South America is prevalent in most of its countries. Those that have the highest rates of poverty per population are Suriname, Bolivia and Venezuela. Recent political shifts in the region have led to improvements in some of these countries. In general, most South American economies have attempted to tackle poverty with stronger economic regulations, foreign direct investments and implementation of microeconomic policies to reduce poverty.
Bangladesh is an under-developed nation. Despite rapid economic growth, poverty remains a major issue. However, poverty has declined sharply in recent history. Shortly after its independence, approximately 90% of the population lived under the poverty line. However, since economic reforms and trade liberalization of early 1990s, along with accelerated economic growth since early-2000s, Bangladesh have experienced a dramatic progress in reducing poverty. The remarkable progress in poverty alleviation has been recognized by international institutions. According to World Bank, more than 33 million Bangladeshi people have been lifted out of poverty since 2000; as measured by the percentage of people living on the equivalent of US$1.90 or less per day in 2011 purchasing price parity terms.
Income inequality in India refers to the unequal distribution of wealth and income among its citizens. According to the CIA World Factbook, the Gini coefficient of India, which is a measure of income distribution inequality, was 35.2 in 2011, ranking 95th out of 157. Wealth distribution is also uneven, with one report estimating that 54% of the country's wealth is controlled by millionaires, the second highest after Russia, as of November 2016. The richest 1% of Indians own 58% of wealth, while the richest 10% of Indians own 80% of the wealth. This trend has consistently increased, meaning the rich are getting richer much faster than the poor, widening the income gap. Inequality worsened since the establishment of income tax in 1922, overtaking the British Raj's record of the share of the top 1% in national income, which was 20.7% in 1939–40.
In 2023, official government statistics reported that the Philippines had a poverty rate of 15.5%,, significantly lower than the 49.2 percent recorded in 1985 through years of government poverty reduction efforts. From 2018 to 2021, an estimated 2.3 million Filipinos fell into poverty amid the economic recession caused by the COVID-19 pandemic.
The underprivileged are significantly more likely to have or incur a disability within their lifetime compared to more financially privileged populations. The rate of disability within impoverished nations is notably higher than that found in more developed countries. Since the early 2010s there has been growing research in support of an association between disability and poverty and of a cycle by which poverty and disability are mutually reinforcing. Physical, cognitive, mental, emotional, sensory, or developmental impairments independently or in tandem with one another may increase one's likelihood of becoming impoverished, while living in poverty may increase one's potential of having or acquiring disability in some capacity.
Sustainable Development Goal 1, one of the 17 Sustainable Development Goals established by the United Nations in 2015, calls for the end of poverty in all forms. The official wording is: "No Poverty". Member countries have pledged to "Leave No One Behind": underlying the goal is a "powerful commitment to leave no one behind and to reach those farthest behind first".