![]() | This article needs to be updated. The reason given is: Over 50 sources were published more than 10 years ago. WP:MEDRS prefers sources within the last 5 years or so.(May 2024) |
![]() | This article needs more reliable medical references for verification or relies too heavily on primary sources .(May 2024) | ![]() |
List of diagnoses characterized as pseudoscience | |
---|---|
Pseudomedical diagnosis | |
Risks | Nocebo |
There are many proposed diseases and diagnoses that are rejected by mainstream medical consensus and are associated with pseudoscience.
Pseudoscientific diseases are not defined using objective criteria. Such diseases cannot achieve, and perhaps do not seek, medical recognition. Pseudoscience rejects empirical methodology. [1]
Other conditions may be rejected or contested by orthodox medicine, but are not necessarily associated with pseudoscience. Diagnostic criteria for some of these conditions may be vague, over-inclusive, or otherwise ill-defined. Although the evidence for the disease may be contested or lacking, the justification for these diagnoses is nevertheless empirical and therefore amenable to scientific investigation, at least in theory.
In some cases, patients are exhibiting genuine signs and symptoms but the explanation or diagnosis for their distress is disputed or inaccurate.
Examples of conditions that are not necessarily pseudoscientific include: