Electromagnetic hypersensitivity

Last updated

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity
Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF), Electrohypersensitivity (EHS), Electro-sensitivity, Electrical sensitivity (ES), Wi-Fi allergy
Pseudomedical diagnosis
Risks Nocebo

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) is a claimed sensitivity to electromagnetic fields, to which adverse symptoms are attributed. EHS has no scientific basis and is not a recognized medical diagnosis, although it is generally accepted that the experience of EHS symptoms is of psychosomatic origin. Claims are characterized by a "variety of non-specific symptoms, which afflicted individuals attribute to exposure to electromagnetic fields". [1] Attempts to justify the claim that EHS is caused by exposure to electromagnetic fields have amounted to pseudoscience. [2]

Contents

Those who are self-diagnosed with EHS report adverse reactions to electromagnetic fields at intensities well below the maximum levels permitted by international radiation safety standards. Provocation trials have found that such claimants are unable to distinguish between exposure and non-exposure to electromagnetic fields. [3] [4] A systematic review of medical research in 2011 found no convincing scientific evidence for symptoms being caused by electromagnetic fields. [3] Since then, several double-blind experiments have shown that people who report electromagnetic hypersensitivity are unable to detect the presence of electromagnetic fields and are as likely to report ill health following a sham exposure as they are following exposure to genuine electromagnetic fields, suggesting the cause in these cases is the nocebo effect. [5] [6] [7]

As of 2005, the WHO recommended that claims of EHS be clinically evaluated to determine and rule out alternative diagnoses for suffered symptoms. [1] Cognitive behavioral therapy and management of comorbid psychiatric disorders may be helpful in managing the condition. [8]

Some people who feel they are sensitive to electromagnetic fields may seek to reduce their exposure or use alternative medicine. [9] Government agencies have enforced false advertising claims against companies selling devices to shield against EM radiation. [10] [11]

Signs and symptoms

There are no specific symptoms associated with claims of EHS, and the reported symptoms range widely among individuals. [1] They include headache, fatigue, stress, sleep disturbances, skin prickling, burning sensations and rashes, and pain and ache in muscles. In severe cases such symptoms can be a real and sometimes disabling problem for the affected person, causing psychological distress. [9] There is no scientific basis to link such symptoms to electromagnetic field exposure. [1]

The prevalence of some reported symptoms is geographically or culturally dependent and does not imply "a causal relationship between symptoms and attributed exposure". [12] [13] Many such reported symptoms overlap with other syndromes known as symptom-based conditions, functional somatic syndromes, and IEI (idiopathic environmental intolerance). [12]

Those reporting electromagnetic hypersensitivity usually describe different levels of susceptibility to electric fields, magnetic fields, and various frequencies of electromagnetic waves. Devices implicated include fluorescent and low-energy lights, mobile, cordless/portable phones, and Wi-Fi. [14] A 2001 survey found that people self-diagnosing as EHS related their symptoms most frequently to cell sites (74%), followed by mobile phones (36%), cordless phones (29%), and power lines (27%). [9] Surveys of people with EHS have found no consistent pattern to these symptoms. [9] [14] [15]

Causes

Most blinded conscious provocation studies have failed to show a correlation between exposure and symptoms. An example is a 2007 study where 17 individuals who showed symptoms in an open test were exposed variously to real mobile phones or sham ones. The individuals showed discomfort at the mobile phones regardless of whether the phones were genuine. [16] These results suggest that psychological mechanisms play a role in causing or exacerbating EHS symptoms. In 2010, Rubin et al. published a follow-up to their 2005 review, bringing the totals to 46 double-blind experiments and 1175 people with self-diagnosed EHS. [17] [18] Neither review found robust evidence to support the hypothesis that electromagnetic exposure causes EHS, nor have other studies. [5] [6] They also concluded that the studies supported the role of the nocebo effect in triggering acute symptoms in those with EHS. [4]

Diagnosis

Electromagnetic hypersensitivity is not an accepted diagnosis; medically there is no case definition or clinical practice guideline and no test to identify it, nor is there an agreed-upon definition with which to conduct clinical research. [19]

Complaints of electromagnetic hypersensitivity may mask organic or psychiatric illness: in a recent psychological model of mental disorder, [20] Sébastien Point proposed to consider it as a specific phobia. Diagnosis of those underlying conditions involves investigating and identifying possible known medical causes of any symptoms observed. [1] It may require both a thorough medical evaluation to identify and treat any specific conditions that may be responsible for the symptoms, and a psychological evaluation to identify alternative psychiatric/psychological conditions that may be responsible or contribute to the symptoms. [1] [21]

Symptoms may also be brought on by imagining that exposure is causing harm, an example of the nocebo effect. Studies have shown that reports of symptoms are more closely associated with belief that one is being exposed than with actual exposure. [5] [6] [22] [23]

Management

Whatever the cause of symptoms attributed to EHS, it can be a debilitating condition that benefits from treatment or management. [8] Cognitive behavioral therapy has shown some success helping people cope with the condition. [8]

As of 2005, WHO recommended that people presenting with claims of EHS be evaluated to determine if they have a medical condition that may be causing the symptoms the person is attributing to EHS, that they have a psychological evaluation, and that the person's environment be evaluated for issues like air or noise pollution that may be causing problems. [1]

A variety of pseudoscientific devices are marketed to those who fear that they are being harmed by electromagnetic fields. [24] The US Federal Trade Commission has warned about scams that involve selling products purported to protect against cell phone radiation. [25] [24] In the UK, a product called 5GBioShield was identified by Trading Standards as a "scam" device. Its manufacturers claimed that it could mitigate harms from phone radiation, but British authorities determined that the device was merely a USB drive. [26]

Prevalence

In 1997, before Wi-Fi, Bluetooth and 3G technology, a group of scientists attempted to estimate the number of people reporting "subjective symptoms" from electromagnetic fields for the European Commission. [27] They estimated that electromagnetic sensitivity occurred in "less than a few cases per million of the population" (based on centres of occupational medicine in UK, Italy and France) or up to "a few tenths of a per cent of the population" (based on self-aid groups in Denmark, Ireland and Sweden). In 2005, the UK Health Protection Agency reviewed this and several other studies for prevalence figures and concluded that "the differences in prevalence were at least partly due to the differences in available information and media attention around electromagnetic hypersensitivity that exist in different countries" and that "Similar views have been expressed by other commentators". [12] The authors noted that most of the studies focused on computer monitors (VDUs), as such the "findings cannot apply in full" to other forms of EMF exposure such as radio waves from mobile phones/base stations.

In 2007, a UK survey aimed at a randomly selected group of 20,000 people found a prevalence of 4% for symptoms self-attributed to electromagnetic exposure. [28]

A 2013 study using telephone surveys in Taiwan concluded that the rates of IEI-EMF were in decline within the country, despite previous expectations of a rise in prevalence as electronic devices became more widespread. Rates declined from 13% in 2007 to 5% in 2013. [29] The study also referred to apparent declines in the Netherlands (from 7% in 2009 [30] to 4% in 2011 [31] ) and in Germany (from 10% in 2009 [32] to 7% in 2013 [32] ). More women believed themselves to be electromagnetically hypersensitive than men. [29]

In 2021, physicist Sébastien Point noted that the prevalence of electrohypersensitivity is similar to the prevalence of specific phobias as well as the gender ratio (2 electrohypersensitive or phobic women for one electrohypersensitive or phobic man), which, according to him, reinforces the hypothesis that electrohypersensitivity is a new specific phobia. [33]

Society and culture

In 2010, a cell tower operator in South Africa revealed at a public meeting that the tower that nearby residents were blaming for their EHS symptoms had been turned off over six weeks before the meeting, making it a highly unlikely cause of EHS symptoms. [34]

In February 2014, the UK Advertising Standards Authority found that claims of harm from electromagnetic radiation, made in a product advertisement, were unsubstantiated and misleading. [11]

People have sued for damages due to harm claimed from electromagnetic radiation. In 2012, a New Mexico judge dismissed a lawsuit in which a person sued his neighbor, claiming to have been harmed by EM radiation from his neighbor's cordless telephones, dimmer switches, chargers, Wi-Fi and other devices. The plaintiff brought the testimony of his doctor, who also believed she had EHS, and a person who represented himself as a neurotoxicologist; the judge found none of their testimony credible. [35] In 2015, parents of a boy at a school in Southborough, Massachusetts, alleged that the school's Wi-Fi was making the boy sick. [35] [36]

In November 2015, a depressed teenage girl in England died by suicide. This act was attributed to EHS by her parents and taken up by tabloids and EHS advocates. [37]

The public position of the EU's Scientific Committee on Emerging and Newly Identified Health Risks (SCENIHR) to the European Commission is that "new improved studies on the association between radio frequency fields from broadcast transmitters and childhood cancer provide evidence against such an association." But "data on the health effects of intermediate frequency fields used, for example, in metal detectors or anti-theft devices in shops, are still lacking." The SCENIHR called for research to continue. [38]

Some people who feel they are sensitive to electromagnetic fields self-treat by trying to reduce their exposure to electromagnetic sources by disconnecting or removing electrical devices, shielding or screening their selves or residences, and alternative medicine. [9] In Sweden, some municipalities provide disability grants to people who claim to have EHS in order to have abatement work done in their homes, even though the public health authority does not recognize EHS as an actual medical condition; towns in Halland do not provide such funds and this decision was challenged and upheld in court. [39] [40] [41]

The United States National Radio Quiet Zone is an area where wireless signals are restricted for scientific research purposes, and some people who believe they have EHS have relocated there to seek relief. [42] [43] [44]

Gro Harlem Brundtland, former prime minister of Norway and Director general of the World Health Organization, claims to have EHS. [45] In 2015, she said that she had been sensitive for 25 years. [46]

The 2022 documentary Electric Malady examines the life of a Swedish man who claims to have EHS. [47]

The crime drama television series Better Call Saul , the prequel to Breaking Bad , features the character Chuck McGill, who claims to have EHS. [48]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electromagnetic radiation and health</span> Aspect of public health

Electromagnetic radiation can be classified into two types: ionizing radiation and non-ionizing radiation, based on the capability of a single photon with more than 10 eV energy to ionize atoms or break chemical bonds. Extreme ultraviolet and higher frequencies, such as X-rays or gamma rays are ionizing, and these pose their own special hazards: see radiation poisoning. The field strength of electromagnetic radiation is measured in volts per meter (V/m).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tin foil hat</span> Hat and stereotype for conspiracy theorists

A tin foil hat is a hat made from one or more sheets of tin foil or aluminium foil, or a piece of conventional headgear lined with foil, often worn in the belief or hope that it shields the brain from threats such as electromagnetic fields, mind control, and mind reading. The notion of wearing homemade headgear for such protection has become a popular stereotype and byword for paranoia, persecutory delusions, and belief in pseudoscience and conspiracy theories.

The microwave auditory effect, also known as the microwave hearing effect or the Frey effect, consists of the human perception of sounds induced by pulsed or modulated radio frequencies. The perceived sounds are generated directly inside the human head without the need of any receiving electronic device. The effect was first reported by persons working in the vicinity of radar transponders during World War II. In 1961, the American neuroscientist Allan H. Frey studied this phenomenon and was the first to publish information on the nature of the microwave auditory effect. The cause is thought to be thermoelastic expansion of portions of the auditory apparatus, although competing theories explain the results of holographic interferometry tests differently.

Multiple chemical sensitivity (MCS) is an unrecognized and controversial diagnosis characterized by chronic symptoms attributed to exposure to low levels of commonly used chemicals. Symptoms are typically vague and non-specific. They may include fatigue, headaches, nausea, and dizziness.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States National Radio Quiet Zone</span> Specific land area in which radio transmissions are heavily restricted

The National Radio Quiet Zone (NRQZ) is a large area of land in the United States designated as a radio quiet zone, in which radio transmissions are restricted by law to facilitate scientific research and the gathering of military intelligence. About half of the zone is located in the Blue Ridge Mountains of west-central Virginia while the other half is in the Allegheny Mountains of east-central West Virginia; a small part of the zone is in the southernmost tip of the Maryland panhandle.

Specific absorption rate (SAR) is a measure of the rate at which energy is absorbed per unit mass by a human body when exposed to a radio frequency (RF) electromagnetic field. It is defined as the power absorbed per mass of tissue and has units of watts per kilogram (W/kg).

A nocebo effect is said to occur when a patient's negative expectations for a treatment cause the treatment to have a worse effect than it otherwise would have. For example, when a patient anticipates a side effect of a medication, they can experience that effect even if the "medication" is actually an inert substance. The complementary concept, the placebo effect, is said to occur when positive expectations improve an outcome. The nocebo effect is also said to occur in someone who falls ill owing to the erroneous belief that they were exposed to a physical phenomenon they believe is harmful, such as EM radiation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Wireless device radiation and health</span> Health Phenomenon

The antennas contained in mobile phones, including smartphones, emit radiofrequency (RF) radiation ; the parts of the head or body nearest to the antenna can absorb this energy and convert it to heat. Since at least the 1990s, scientists have researched whether the now-ubiquitous radiation associated with mobile phone antennas or cell phone towers is affecting human health. Mobile phone networks use various bands of RF radiation, some of which overlap with the microwave range. Other digital wireless systems, such as data communication networks, produce similar radiation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hypersensitivity pneumonitis</span> Medical condition

Hypersensitivity pneumonitis (HP) or extrinsic allergic alveolitis (EAA) is a syndrome caused by the repetitive inhalation of antigens from the environment in susceptible or sensitized people. Common antigens include molds, bacteria, bird droppings, bird feathers, agricultural dusts, bioaerosols and chemicals from paints or plastics. People affected by this type of lung inflammation (pneumonitis) are commonly exposed to the antigens by their occupations, hobbies, the environment and animals. The inhaled antigens produce a hypersensitivity immune reaction causing inflammation of the airspaces (alveoli) and small airways (bronchioles) within the lung. Hypersensitivity pneumonitis may eventually lead to interstitial lung disease.

Bioelectromagnetics, also known as bioelectromagnetism, is the study of the interaction between electromagnetic fields and biological entities. Areas of study include electromagnetic fields produced by living cells, tissues or organisms, the effects of man-made sources of electromagnetic fields like mobile phones, and the application of electromagnetic radiation toward therapies for the treatment of various conditions.

Occupational lung diseases comprise a broad group of diseases, including occupational asthma, industrial bronchitis, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD), bronchiolitis obliterans, inhalation injury, interstitial lung diseases, infections, lung cancer and mesothelioma. These can be caused directly or due to immunological response to an exposure to a variety of dusts, chemicals, proteins or organisms. Occupational cases of interstitial lung disease may be misdiagnosed as COPD, idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis, or a myriad of other diseases; leading to a delay in identification of the causative agent.

Arthur Robert Firstenberg is an American author and activist on the subject of electromagnetic radiation and health. He is the founder of the independent campaign group the Cellular Phone Task Force. He is the author of Microwaving Our Planet: The Environmental Impact of the Wireless Revolution and The Invisible Rainbow: A History of Electricity and Life.

Radiobiology is a field of clinical and basic medical sciences that involves the study of the effects of ionizing radiation on living things, in particular health effects of radiation. Ionizing radiation is generally harmful and potentially lethal to living things but can have health benefits in radiation therapy for the treatment of cancer and thyrotoxicosis. Its most common impact is the induction of cancer with a latent period of years or decades after exposure. High doses can cause visually dramatic radiation burns, and/or rapid fatality through acute radiation syndrome. Controlled doses are used for medical imaging and radiotherapy.

Idiopathic environmental intolerances (IEI) are medical syndromes with no proven cause, but which the affected people attribute to various environmental situations. The most common forms are multiple chemical sensitivity, electromagnetic hypersensitivity (electricity), and wind turbine syndrome (noise).

The BioInitiative Report is a report on the relationship between the electromagnetic fields (EMF) associated with powerlines and wireless devices and health. It was self-published online, without peer review, on 31 August 2007, by a group "of 14 scientists, researchers, and public health policy professionals". The BioInitiative Report states that it is an examination of the controversial health risks of electromagnetic fields and radiofrequency radiation. Some updated BioInitiative material was published in a journal in an issue guest-edited by one of the members of the group, and a 2012 version of the report was released on 7 January 2013. It has been heavily criticized by independent and governmental research groups for its lack of balance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Non-ionizing radiation</span> Harmless low-frequency radiation

Non-ionizingradiation refers to any type of electromagnetic radiation that does not carry enough energy per quantum to ionize atoms or molecules—that is, to completely remove an electron from an atom or molecule. Instead of producing charged ions when passing through matter, non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation has sufficient energy only for excitation. Non-ionizing radiation is not a significant health risk. In contrast, ionizing radiation has a higher frequency and shorter wavelength than non-ionizing radiation, and can be a serious health hazard: exposure to it can cause burns, radiation sickness, many kinds of cancer, and genetic damage. Using ionizing radiation requires elaborate radiological protection measures, which in general are not required with non-ionizing radiation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fluorescent lamps and health</span>

Fluorescent lamps have been suggested to affect human health in various ways.

Henry Lai is a bioengineering professor emeritus at the University of Washington, and editor-in-chief of Electromagnetic Biology and Medicine. Lai published research in 1995 that concluded that low-level microwave radiation caused DNA damage in rat brains.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">5G misinformation</span> False or misleading information about 5G technology

Misinformation related to 5G technology is widespread in many countries of the world. The spreading of false information and conspiracy theories has also been propagated by the general public and celebrities. In social media, misinformation related to 5G has been presented as facts, and circulated extensively. There are no scientifically proven adverse health impacts from the exposure to 5G radio frequency radiation with levels below those suggested by the guidelines of regulating bodies, including the International Commission on Non-Ionizing Radiation Protection (ICNIRP). Furthermore, studies have shown that there is no noticeable increase in the everyday radiofrequency electromagnetic exposure since 2012, despite the increased use of communication devices.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 "Electromagnetic fields and public health: Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity". WHO Factsheet 296. World Health Organisation (WHO). December 2005. Archived from the original on 27 July 2023. Retrieved 17 February 2023.
  2. ↑ "Electromagnetic hypersensitivity". Archived from the original on 20 March 2024. Retrieved 24 August 2023.
  3. 1 2 Rubin, G. James; Hillert, Lena; Nieto-Hernandez, Rosa; van Rongen, Eric; Oftedal, Gunnhild (December 2011). "Do people with idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields display physiological effects when exposed to electromagnetic fields? A systematic review of provocation studies". Bioelectromagnetics. 32 (8): 593–609. doi:10.1002/bem.20690. ISSN   1521-186X. OCLC   5155348095. PMID   21769898. S2CID   29. Archived from the original on 17 December 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  4. 1 2 Röösli, Martin; Hug, Kerstin (2008). "Radiofrequency electromagnetic field exposure and non-specific symptoms of ill health: a systematic review". Environ. Res. 107 (2): 277–287. Bibcode:2008ER....107..277R. doi:10.1007/s10354-011-0883-9. PMID   18359015. S2CID   35066893. Archived from the original on 5 August 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  5. 1 2 3 Regel, Sabine; Negovetic, Sonja; Röösli, Martin; Berdiñas, Veronica; Schuderer, Jürgen; Huss, Anke; Lott, Urs; Kuster, Niels; Achermann, Peter (August 2006). "UMTS Base Station-like Exposure, Well-Being, and Cognitive Performance". Environ Health Perspect. 114 (8): 1270–1275. doi:10.1289/ehp.8934. PMC   1552030 . PMID   16882538.
  6. 1 2 3 Rubin, G. James; Hahn, Gareth; Everitt, Brian S.; Clear, Anthony J.; Wessely, Simon (2006). "Are some people sensitive to mobile phone signals? Within participants double blind randomised provocation study". British Medical Journal. 332 (7546): 886–889. doi:10.1136/bmj.38765.519850.55. PMC   1440612 . PMID   16520326.
  7. ↑ Wilén, Jonna; Johansson, Amanda; Kalezic, Nebojsa; Lyskov, Eugene; Sandström, Monica (2006). "Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms". Bioelectromagnetics. 27 (3): 204–214. doi:10.1002/bem.20195. PMID   16304699. S2CID   39662872. Archived from the original on 18 December 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 Genuis, Stephen J.; Lipp, Christopher T. (2012). "Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: fact or fiction?". Sci Total Environ (Review). 414: 103–112. Bibcode:2012ScTEn.414..103G. doi:10.1016/j.scitotenv.2011.11.008. PMID   22153604.
  9. 1 2 3 4 5 Röösli, Martin; Moser, Mirjana; Baldinini, Yvonne; Meier, Martin; Braun-Fahrländer, Charlotte (February 2004). "Symptoms of ill health ascribed to electromagnetic field exposure – a questionnaire survey". International Journal of Hygiene and Environmental Health . 207 (2): 141–150. doi:10.1078/1438-4639-00269. PMID   15031956. S2CID   6077907. Archived from the original on 21 April 2024. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  10. ↑ Fair, Lesley (1 March 2008). "Federal Trade Commission Advertising Enforcement" (PDF). Federal Trade Commission. pp. 18–19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 16 June 2023. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
  11. 1 2 "ASA Ruling on The Healthy House Ltd". UK Advertising Standards Authority. 19 February 2014. Archived from the original on 1 November 2016. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
  12. 1 2 3 "Definition, epidemiology and management of electrical sensitivity" Archived 29 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine , Irvine, N, Report for the Radiation Protection Division of the UK Health Protection Agency, HPA-RPD-010, 2005
  13. ↑ Sage, Cindy. "Microwave And Radiofrequency Radiation Exposure: A Growing Environmental Health Crisis?". San Francisco Medical Society web page. Archived from the original on 15 May 2008. Retrieved 31 May 2008.
  14. 1 2 Philips, Alasdair and Jean (2003–2011). Electromagnetic hypersensitivity (EHS) (in 8 sections)
  15. ↑ Hillert, Lena; Berglind, Niklas; Arnetz, Bengt B.; Bellander, Tom (February 2002). "Prevalence of self-reported hypersensitivity to electric or magnetic fields in a population-based questionnaire survey". Scand J Work Environ Health. 28 (1): 33–41. doi: 10.5271/sjweh.644 . PMID   11871850.
  16. ↑ G Oftedal; et al. (May 2007). "Mobile Phone Headache: A Double Blind, Sham-Controlled Provocation Study". Cephalalgia. 27 (5). Sage Pub: 447–455. doi:10.1111/j.1468-2982.2007.01336.x. PMID   17359515. S2CID   31156109.
  17. ↑ Rubin, G. James; Munshi, Jayati Das; Wessely, Simon (2005). "Electromagnetic hypersensitivity: a systematic review of provocation studies". Psychosom Med. 67 (2): 224–232. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.543.1328 . doi:10.1097/01.psy.0000155664.13300.64. PMID   15784787. S2CID   13826364. Archived from the original on 11 February 2021. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  18. ↑ Rubin, James; Nieto-Hernandez, Rosa; Wessely, Simon (2010). "Idiopathic Environmental Intolerance Attributed to Electromagnetic Fields". Bioelectromagnetics. 31 (1): 1–11. doi:10.1002/bem.20536. PMID   19681059. S2CID   10993481. Archived from the original on 7 July 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  19. ↑ Baliatsas, Christos; Van Kamp, Irene; Lebret, Erik; Rubin, G. James (2012). "Idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields (IEI-EMF): a systematic review of identifying criteria". BMC Public Health (Systematic review). 12: 643. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-12-643 . PMC   3504528 . PMID   22883305.
  20. ↑ Point, Sebastien (January–February 2020). "Advocacy For A Cognitive Approach To Electrohypersensitivity Syndrome". Skeptical Inquirer . Vol. 44, no. 1. Amherst, NY: Center for Inquiry. pp. 47–50.
  21. ↑ Rubin, G. James; Cleare, Anthony J.; Wessely, Simon (January 2008). "Psychological factors associated with self-reported sensitivity to mobile phones". Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 64 (1): 1–9, discussion 11–22. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2007.05.006. PMID   18157992. S2CID   6562686. Archived from the original on 8 July 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  22. ↑ Wilén, Jonna; Johansson, Amanda; Kalezic, Nebojsa; Lyskov, Eugene; Sandström, Monica (2006). "Psychophysiological tests and provocation of subjects with mobile phone related symptoms". Bioelectromagnetics. 27 (3): 204–214. doi:10.1002/bem.20195. PMID   16304699. S2CID   39662872. Archived from the original on 18 December 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  23. ↑ Dunning, Brian (30 October 2007). "Skeptoid #72: Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity: Real or Imagined?". Skeptoid . Retrieved 27 December 2016. The ability of a human brain to convince itself of just about anything is not to be underestimated. If you believe yourself to be electrosensitive, then you will be, quite literally, whenever you (think that you) perceive the presence of electromagnetism... you will actually suffer measurable physical symptoms and can potentially become acutely ill.
  24. 1 2 Haime, Jordyn (17 May 2022). "How fears of electromagnetic radiation spawned a snake-oil industry". The Verge. Archived from the original on 18 May 2022. Retrieved 19 May 2022.
  25. ↑ "FTC Offers Tips to Help Consumers Avoid Cell Phone Radiation Scams". Federal Trade Commission. 16 June 2011. Archived from the original on 4 June 2022. Retrieved 19 May 2022.
  26. ↑ Cellan-Jones, Rory (28 May 2020). "Trading Standards squad targets anti-5G USB stick". BBC News. Archived from the original on 21 May 2022. Retrieved 21 May 2022.
  27. ↑ Bergqvist, Ulf; Vogel, Evi; Aringer, Leif; Cunningham, Joe; Gobba, Fabriziomaria; Leitgeb, Norbert; Miro, Luis; Neubauer, Georg; Ruppe, Ingeburg; Vecchia, Paolo; Wadman, Cecilia (1997). "Possible health implications of subjective symptoms and electromagnetic fields. A report prepared by a European group of experts for the European Commission, DG V". Arbete och Hälsa. 19. ISSN   0346-7821. OCLC   709978351. Archived from the original on 30 October 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  28. ↑ Eltiti, Stacy; Wallace, Denise; Zougkou, Konstantina; Russo, Riccardo; Joseph, Stephen; Rasor, Paul; Fox, Elaine (February 2007). "Development and evaluation of the electromagnetic hypersensitivity questionnaire". Bioelectromagnetics. 28 (2): 137–151. doi:10.1002/bem.20279. PMID   17013888. S2CID   15932877. Archived from the original on 7 July 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  29. 1 2 Huang, Po-Chien; Cheng, Meng-Ting; Guo, How-Ran (2018). "Representative survey on idiopathic environmental intolerance attributed to electromagnetic fields in Taiwan and comparison with the international literature". Environ Health (Review). 17 (1): 5. Bibcode:2018EnvHe..17....5H. doi: 10.1186/s12940-018-0351-8 . PMC   5769530 . PMID   29334987.
  30. ↑ van Dongen, Diana; Smid, Tjabe; Timmermans, Danielle (2014). "Symptom attribution and risk perception in individuals with idiopathic environmental intolerance to electromagnetic fields and in the general population". Perspectives in Public Health. 134 (3). Perspect Public Health: 134:160–168. doi:10.1177/1757913913492931. PMID   23912159. S2CID   2995533. Archived from the original on 2 January 2020. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
  31. ↑ Baliatsas, Christos; van Kamp, Irene; Hooiveld, Mariette; Yzermans, Joris; Lebret, Erik (2014). "Comparing non-specific physical symptoms in environmentally sensitive patients: prevalence, duration, functional status and illness behavior". Journal of Psychosomatic Research. 76 (5): 405–413. doi:10.1016/j.jpsychores.2014.02.008. PMID   24745783. S2CID   167319. Archived from the original on 17 July 2020. Retrieved 2 January 2020.
  32. 1 2 Lauff H, Wachenfeld A. Abschlussbericht (2014). "Differenzierte Betrachtung der Nutzung und der Wahrnehmung des Mobilfunks" (PDF). Bundesamt für Strahlenschutz (BFS): BfS-RESFOR-88/14. Archived (PDF) from the original on 15 March 2016. Retrieved 1 January 2016.
  33. ↑ Sébastien Point, Electrohypersensitivity as a new psychological disorder, Skeptic, Vol.26 n°4, 2021
  34. ↑ "Massive revelation in iBurst tower battle". Archived from the original on 10 October 2016. Retrieved 31 December 2016.
  35. 1 2 Barrett, Stephen (28 August 2015). "'Electromagnetic Hypersensitivity' Is Not a Valid Diagnosis". Quackwatch. Archived from the original on 1 November 2016. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
  36. ↑ O'Connell, Scott (18 January 2016). "Wi-Fi lawsuit against Southboro's Fay School is headed to trial". The Telegram. Archived from the original on 13 September 2024. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
  37. ↑ Gorski, David (7 December 2015). "'Electromagnetic hypersensitivity' and 'wifi allergies': Bogus diagnoses with tragic real world consequences". Science-Based Medicine. Archived from the original on 26 January 2017. Retrieved 1 November 2016.
  38. ↑ "Electromagnetic field emissions addressed by EU standards". 25 June 2009. Archived from the original on 14 August 2021. Retrieved 21 June 2020.
  39. ↑ Johansson, Olle (2015). "Electrohypersensitivity: a functional impairment due to an inaccessible environment". Reviews on Environmental Health. 30 (4): 311–321. doi:10.1515/reveh-2015-0018. PMID   26613327. S2CID   39702466. Archived from the original on 7 July 2023. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  40. ↑ "Inga bidrag ges till elsanering i Halland – P4 Halland". Sveriges Radio (in Swedish). 31 July 2007. Archived from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2017.
  41. ↑ Berglind-Dehlin, Henrik (3 January 2016). "Kommuner erbjuder fortfarande elsanering". SVT Nyheter. Archived from the original on 13 October 2017. Retrieved 8 June 2017.
  42. ↑ O'Brien, Jane; Danzico, Matt (12 September 2011). "'Wi-fi refugees' shelter in West Virginia mountains". BBC News. Archived from the original on 11 April 2013. Retrieved 13 September 2011.
  43. ↑ Stromberg, Joseph (12 April 2013). "Green Bank, W.V., where the electrosensitive can escape the modern world". Slate . Archived from the original on 14 April 2013. Retrieved 14 April 2013.
  44. ↑ Gaynor, Michael (January 2015). "The Town Without Wi-Fi". Washingtonian . Archived from the original on 12 January 2015. Retrieved 12 January 2015.
  45. ↑ Dalsegg, Aud (9 March 2002). "Får hodesmerter av mobilstråling". dagbladet.no (in Norwegian). Archived from the original on 1 May 2018. Retrieved 7 July 2023.
  46. ↑ Tjernshaugen, Karen (14 August 2015). "Brundtland – Min kropp har reagert på mobilstråling i 25 år". Aftenposten (in Norwegian). Archived from the original on 1 May 2018. Retrieved 1 May 2018.
  47. ↑ Clarke, Cath (1 March 2023). "Electric Malady review – life under a blanket for man who fears 'electrosenstivity'". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 September 2024. Retrieved 2 March 2023.
  48. ↑ Rubin, James; Wessely, Simon (15 February 2015). "Better Call Saul: is electromagnetic hypersensitivity a real health risk?". The Guardian. Archived from the original on 13 September 2024. Retrieved 29 March 2023.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.