Litter in New Zealand

Last updated

View of 'clean, green' countryside in Auckland Green countryside in Auckland, New Zealand.jpg
View of 'clean, green' countryside in Auckland
Litter in a stormwater drain in Wellington Litter in a stormwater drain in Wellington.jpg
Litter in a stormwater drain in Wellington

Litter is a global issue and has a significant human impact on the environment. Litter is especially hazardous because it can enter ecosystems and harm a country's biodiversity. Litter is a prevalent environmental issue in New Zealand.

Contents

New Zealanders are known to take pride in their 'clean green' image. A national survey conducted in December 2017 revealed that 99% of respondents considered the maintenance of New Zealand's 'clean green' image to be of importance. For these reasons the prevention of litter is considered to be of national importance. While New Zealand is considered an environmentally conscious country, it continues to encounter litter issues. Plastic items are recorded to be the most littered item in the country. Cigarette butts, consisting primarily of plastic, are the most littered item worldwide and are therefore also pervasive in New Zealand. Plastic Litter is a particularly harmful form of litter as it threatens the New Zealand environment and the wildlife that inhabits it. Due to littering, New Zealand's endangered species are at risk of extinction. The National Litter Audit revealed that 80% of the litter found in the country's waterways originated from the land. Plastic litter in particular threatens wildlife because it contaminates the water and therefore poses health risks to marine wildlife and seabirds.

The Keep New Zealand Beautiful organisation was founded in 1967. The 1979 Litter Act established the organisation as the national body responsible for the promotion of litter control in New Zealand. Since 2018, Keep New Zealand Beautiful has released national reports concerning the issue of litter in New Zealand's regions. The National Litter Behaviour Study was released in 2018 and the Litter Audit was released in 2019. These reports have informed a response to litter in New Zealand. Policy measures for litter abatement include fines and a national action plan to reduce plastics. Further strategies for litter abatement include educational programmes and campaigns, most of which are developed by Keep New Zealand Beautiful.

Environmental impact of littering

New Zealanders are known to take pride in their 'clean green' image. [1] While it is considered an environmentally conscious country, litter remains an ongoing issue. [1] Following the research released in the 2019 National Litter Audit, chief executive of the Keep New Zealand Beautiful organisation, Heather Saunderson, has stated that litter remains a considerably large environmental issue in New Zealand. [2] Litter is especially hazardous because it can enter ecosystems and harm New Zealand's biodiversity. [3]

Litter in waterways and the ocean

The 2019 National Litter Audit revealed that 80% of the litter found in the country's waterways originated from the land. [4] The most common environmental pollutant found in waterways and marine life is plastic. [5] [6] Deliberate littering and illegal dumping are amongst the main contributors to plastic waste in New Zealand. [7] Through the monitoring of beach litter, a 2019 environmental report conducted by the New Zealand charity Sustainable Coastlines and supported by the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment and Statistics New Zealand has identified plastic pollution to be the most common form of litter on New Zealand beaches. The Our marine environment 2019 report revealed 61% of litter on beaches to be of a plastic material and 11% of the plastic litter found on the country's beaches came from cigarettes. [8] The second most common item were either glass or ceramic. These made up 21.7% of all items collected. [8] : 30  The report revealed that the effect of single-use plastic poses a significant threat on the country's marine life.

Impact of plastic litter on wildlife

Maui dolphins Two Maui's dolphins.jpg
Māui dolphins
A red billed gull with a cigarette butt in Wellington Juvenile red billed gull smoking.jpg
A red billed gull with a cigarette butt in Wellington

An estimated 30% of New Zealand's biodiversity reside in the sea. [9] : 7  Of these 90% of seabirds, 80% of shorebirds and 22% of marine mammals are threatened with or at risk of becoming extinct. [9] : 7  In addition, almost half of the world's whales, dolphins and porpoises have been recorded in New Zealand waters. [10] Plastic pollution is one of the biggest contributors to the threat of extinction. [11] Microplastics which are less than 5 millimetres in length are particularly dangerous pollutants because they are easily ingested by marine life. [12] For animals on land and in the water, the ingestion of plastic reduces their intake of essential nutrients, traffic their digestive tracts, and negatively affect reproductive behaviour. [12] Plastic materials also easily absorb toxins which, when ingested by larger animals like marine mammals, can cause death. [13] Toxins easily absorbed by plastics include persistent organic pollutants and heavy metals. [14] In addition, plastics are already manufactured with harmful chemicals. [14] For these reasons plastic litter contaminates water and poses a significant health risk to wildlife.

Plastics have been reported in fish, seabirds, and shellfish. [11] Because they resemble food and are ubiquitous in the environment due to issues like littering, microplastics are easily ingested by animals. [15] The prevalence of plastic debris means that marine mammals are at risk of becoming trapped in or wounded by drifting materials. They are also at risk of ingesting plastic debris. The New Zealand Department of Conservation has reported that Māui dolphins, a critically endangered subspecies of the Hector's dolphin, are at risk of dying from marine litter. Māui dolphins are endemic to New Zealand's North Island where they are known to occupy harbours where commercial and amateur fisheries are located. [16]

Research conducted by the Royal Society of New Zealand has shown the country's seabirds to be at risk of consuming plastic with the earliest discovery of plastic ingestion dating back to 1958. [17] [18] One-third of all species of seabirds inhabit New Zealand. [19] The country is also the main breeding ground for the highest number of seabird species globally. [19] For these reasons, New Zealand has been described as being the "seabird capital of the world". [20] 86 of the 360 global seabird species breed in New Zealand 37 are endemic to New Zealand, meaning they breed nowhere else in the world. [21] The prevalence of plastic pollution on New Zealand coasts means seabirds are increasingly at risk of eating plastics. [11] A 2019 report on Plastics and the environment states that New Zealand is: [22]

"...home to one-third of all species of seabird and the breeding ground for the highest number of seabird species worldwide. Because of this, plastic debris in our seas poses a higher risk to seabird populations and efforts to protect these species and their ecosystems by preventing plastic in the environment are crucial."

Forest and Bird, a non-profit conservation organisation, has warned that birds like shearwaters and albatross can not distinguish floating plastic from fish. [23] The pervasive ingestion of plastic seen in New Zealand's seabirds since the first earliest recorded observation in 1958 means plastic pollution is one of the primary reasons why 90% of the country's seabirds are at risk of extinction. [21] Because New Zealand is home to and hosts such a large population of seabirds, the risk of extinction posed by plastics is considered the worst in New Zealand than anywhere else in the world. [24]

Impact of organic litter on birdlife

Kea tampering with a van Kea on a van.jpg
Kea tampering with a van

The environmental impact of litter on land also poses a significant danger to wildlife. The disposal of organic waste like banana peels or sandwich crusts is also a form of littering which threatens native birds. The Department of Conservation states that birds like the kea, a nationally endangered parrot, are known to be curious and playful creatures. [25] Keas are likely to forage for food in areas occupied by humans. [25] In these areas, they are made vulnerable to consuming human food scraps. The Department of Conservation has advised that human food products are unhealthy for a kea's digestive system and temporarily decrease their appetite. [25] As a consequence, keas can become destructive with surrounding human belongings. To protect New Zealand's environment and the native species that inhabit it, visitors to conservation land are required to take their rubbish with them until they can dispose of it responsibly in an appropriate bin. [25]

Legislation

The Litter Act 1979

The New Zealand Coat of Arms Coat of arms of New Zealand.svg
The New Zealand Coat of Arms

The Litter Act 1979 is administered by the Ministry for the Environment. The Act defines littering as intentionally or unintentionally depositing of litter. It defines litter as including "any refuse, rubbish, animal remains, glass, metal, garbage, debris, dirt, filth, rubble, ballast, stones, earth, or waste matter, or any other thing of a like nature." [26] The Act established Keep New Zealand Beautiful as the organisation responsible for the promotion of litter control in New Zealand. [27]

Litter Control Officers

Section 5 of the Litter Act permits public authorities to appoint Litter Control Officers. [28] Moreover, Section 6 of the Act states that anyone appointed to a particular public office is also conferred the powers and duties of a Litter Control Officer. [29] Such persons include constables, traffic officers, harbourmasters, and national park rangers. [29] Section 7 of the Act states that every appointed Litter Control Officer is authorised to enforce the provisions of the Act. It is within an Officer's powers and duties to intervene in the deposition or attempted deposition of litter in a public place or a private land. [30] They are further authorised to intervene if they witness the deliberate damage or attempted deliberate damage of any litter receptacle in a public place. [30] To support these provisions, a revised version of section 7 additionally references the Offences Act 1981. [30]

Litter Wardens

In a similar category as the Litter Control Officers, every public authority has the right to appoint a temporary Litter Warden. Section 8 of the Litter Act states that, unless the conditions of his appointment state otherwise, the Litter Warden is authorised to exercise the same duties as the Litter Control Officers. [31] Within the parameters of their given district, the Litter Warden is conferred the same powers and duties as the Officer. However, unlike Litter Control Officers, Litter Wardens are not permitted to legally intervene if an offence is being committed. [31] This means that they are unable to issue infringement notices.

Public bins

Section 9 of the Litter Act states that every person, public authority, and department of State is required to provide and be responsible for the maintenance of bins in public places. [32] Maintenance refers to the regularly emptying of the bin's contents and efficient disposal of those contents. Wherever rubbish is generated and likely to be littered, a reasonable distribution of well-constructed and suitable bins is necessary. The provision of litter receptacles is a mandatory means of enforcing litter control. If a noticeable amount of litter in public areas originates from any particular land or premises, section 9 of the Litter Act states that intervention of the public authority is necessary. To control litter, the public authority must require the occupier of the land or premises to provide and maintain the number of bins necessary for the disposal of litter. If an occupier fails to comply with this request, the public authority may install bins and recover costs from the occupier. [32]

Grants and bylaws

Under Section 11 of the Litter Act, local or public authorities are permitted to make grants for the purpose of litter prevention or abatement. [33] Section 11 provides that any local or public authority can make grants to any non-for-profit organisation for the prevention or abatement of litter. Such authorities are permitted to provide monetary support to any anti-litter campaign or scheme. [33]

Section 12 of the Litter Act allows public authorities to make bylaws. It states that a public authority, whether it is acting independently or in collaboration with other public authorities, is permitted to occasionally make bylaws. These bylaws must be in accordance with the Litter Act and function with the purpose of litter control and prevention. [34]

The Litter Amendment Act 2006

The Litter Amendment Act 2006 made changes to the principal Act, including significant increases to maximum fines. Section 15 of the 1979 Litter Act addresses the deposition of litter in public or on private land. The expense of fines within section 15 were revised. Subsection 2 states that litter disposed in a dangerous manner or in a manner likely to cause harm is an offence warranting a fine not exceeding $7,500 and for a body corporate, this fine is not exceeding $30,000. Before this emendation was made, subsection 2 read $750 instead of $7,500 and $30,000 was originally $5,000. [35] These changes were inserted in the Litter Act 1979 on 28 June 2006. [36]

The Amendment Act also removed the defence of “reasonable excuse” and instituted strict liability, meaning that the prosecution does not need to prove that the defendant intentionally committed an offence under the Act. [35]

Litter behaviour research

In 2018, Keep New Zealand Beautiful published a National Litter Behaviour Research report. The study details both intentional and unintentional litter disposal observations of people in public places. It was conducted in late 2017 by an Auckland-based consultancy firm called Sunshine Yates Consulting. [37] The behavioural litter patterns documented in the report indicate the prevalence of rubbish pollution within New Zealand's most populous regions.

Objective

The objective of the Litter Behaviour research project was to measure and evaluate litter behaviour through fieldwork undertaken across New Zealand. The project was undertaken by Sunshine Yates Consulting, with the purpose of informing litter abatement strategies and developing a precedent for future litter prevention activities. [38] By conducting self-reports and through the collection of observational data, the report also aimed to establish a Disposal Behaviour Index (DBI) for each major region in the country. [39]

Method

Fieldwork was covered throughout the North Island and South Island of New Zealand. Research was primarily conducted in the Greater Auckland region, Wellington region and the Canterbury region. [40] The study used a multi-method approach. [38] It involved both an observational approach to disposal behaviour and surveys with members of the public. [41] The Observational Approach (OA) is a method used to record details of disposal behaviour as it happens. [42] According to the research report, the aim of OA was to “provide a systematic and direct method of measuring behaviour in the actual context in which it occurs.” [42]

The research was conducted by Keep New Zealand Beautiful volunteers. All the volunteers were trained in ethnographic data gathering techniques. [42] After observing an act of disposal, observers directed an interviewer to conduct a self-report. Fieldwork commenced on 23 November and finished on 13 December 2017. [43] Observations were made during daylight hours only between 7am and 6pm. [43] Speciality sites included beaches, these were not available in every region. [43] Core sites included:

Key findings

According to the executive summary of the National Litter Behaviour Research document, New Zealand has a litter rate of 16%. [40] This means that the observational study of littering in public areas showed that 84% did not litter and disposed of their items responsibly. [40] Results revealed that the National Deposit Behaviour Index score of New Zealand is 6 and therefore high. [44] The Deposit Behaviour Index operates on a scale from 1 to 7. [45] The score 1 equals a low level of responsible rubbish disposable and indicates a high prevalence of littering. [45] The score 7 indicates minimal littering and a high prevalence of people disposing of their rubbish in bins. [45] The report revealed that the Regional Disposal Behaviour Index score in Wellington is 7 and in Auckland and Canterbury it is 6.

Observational data revealed that the most littered items were cigarette butts. Nationally, 78% of litter acts were of cigarette butts. [46] Instances of cigarette butt disposal observed during the project recorded 57% of cigarette butts littered while 43% were disposed of in bins. [46]

National surveys revealed that 75% of respondents considered it extremely important that people do not litter in the area where they were interviewed. [47] A further 18% of respondents considered it very important. [47] The remaining 7% of respondents considered it moderately or slightly important. [47] Nationally, 99% of respondents considered the maintenance of New Zealand's 'clean green' image to be of importance. [48]

Demographic

The age and gender of people who were observed littering and subsequently agreed to be interviewed varied. The observational data collected in the Litter Behaviour Study revealed that 53% of people littering were male. [49] In addition, people aged between 25 and 34 made up a quarter of the overall people observed littering. [49]

The survey data further revealed that 66% of the people who self-reported having littered were either in full or part-time employment. [50] In addition, the study concluded that the likelihood of a person littering did not appear dependent on their level of education. [50]

National Litter Audit 2019

The National Litter Audit 2019 was undertaken by Keep New Zealand Beautiful, using a methodology developed in conjunction with Statistics New Zealand, the Department of Conservation and the Ministry for the Environment. It was supported by the Waste Minimisation Fund which is administered by the Ministry for the Environment. [51] The Audit has been referred to as "the most comprehensive litter audit of its scale carried out in New Zealand." [52]

Sites

National Litter Audit 2019 - top categories by weight per 1,000 m Litter Audit NZ 2019 - top categories by mass per 1000 sq m.svg
National Litter Audit 2019 – top categories by weight per 1,000 m

The audit revealed that 80% of the litter found in the country's waterways originated from the land. [4] For this reason, the audit is primarily concerned with land-based litter. The main site types inspected in the audit were residential, retail and industrial areas as well as carparks, highways, railways and public recreational areas. [53] These types of sites were surveyed within the local territorial authority regions of Auckland, Gisborne, Nelson, Tasman and Marlborough.

The highest numbers of littered items discovered per 1,000 m2 were within industrial sites. This was followed by retail and highway sites. [54]

The highest volume of litter objects recorded per 1,000 m2 were found at highway sites, railway sites and industrial sites. [54]

Railway sites, highway sites and industrial sites also accounted for the highest weights per 1,000 m2. [54]

Litter recorded per 1,000 m2
site typenumbersvolumeweight
Industrial256 items13.66 L1.27 kg
Retail241 items7.61 L0.48 kg
Highways195 items43.67 L2.29 kg
Railways138 items25.21 L3.24 kg
Carparks108 items4.70 L0.37 kg
Residential103 items7.66 L0.67 kg
Recreational20 items1.02 L0.08 kg

Litter materials

National Litter Audit 2019 - top 12 categories by items per 1,000 m Litter Audit NZ 2019 - top 12 by category.svg
National Litter Audit 2019 – top 12 categories by items per 1,000 m

The main categories of litter materials identified in the audit included cigarette butts, paper and cardboard, metal, glass, plastic and organic waste. [55] The most frequently found item nationally was cigarette butts. 39 butts were recorded per 1,000 m2. [56] Disposable nappies, which were included in "miscellaneous" items, made up the largest contribution to the estimated national litter volumes, recording 1.50 litres of volume per 1,000 m2. [57] Glass beer bottles made up the largest contribution to the national litter weights, recording 0.12 kg of weight per 1,000 m2. [58]

Litter recorded per 1,000 m2
Material typenumbersvolumeweight
Cigarette butts39 items0.0003 L0.012 kg
Plastic29 items1.16 L0.11 kg
Paper/Cardboard15 items1.66 L0.06 kg
Metal14 items0.93 L0.10 kg
Glass12 items0.64 L0.23 kg
Miscellaneous7 items1.59 L0.07 kg
Organic waste1 item0.04 L0.03 kg
Illegal dumping<1 item1.31 Lnot recorded

Cigarette butt litter

While the smoking rate in New Zealand is low, [59] cigarette butts are the most littered item in the country. [60] [56] [61] A 2018 study conducted by the Keep New Zealand Beautiful council recorded that cigarette butts made up 78% of all items littered nationally. [62] For these reasons, the littering of cigarette butts is recognised as a pervasive issue in New Zealand. [63] While the littering of cigarette butts is considerable in New Zealand, it is also of international concern. According to the Tobacco-Free Life campaign, the littering of cigarette butts is a global issue with an estimated 4,5 trillion butts littered internationally every year. [64] [65] In addition, research conducted by the Royal Society of New Zealand has revealed that cigarette butts are amongst the most common plastic items collected in international beach clean-ups. [6]

Littering behaviour

The National Litter Behaviour study conducted by Keep New Zealand Beautiful in 2018, revealed the littering of cigarette butts to be prevalent throughout New Zealand. The study observed that 59% of cigarette butts disposed of in Auckland were littered. [66] In Canterbury 71% of cigarette butts observed being disposed of were littered and Wellington the percentage of cigarette butts observed being littered was 39%. [66] The rate of littering cigarette butts is believed to be high because people do not generally view cigarette butts as a valid form of litter or they believe it to be harmless. [67] In a survey conducted by Keep New Zealand Beautiful 42% of respondents who were observed littering cigarette butts claimed they had never littered. [68] In addition, the study found that the smokers did not believe their littering of cigarette butts to be a real form of litter or that they believed them to be biodegradable. [68]

A study conducted in urban Wellington in 2011 found that smokers littering cigarette butts was conventional behaviour, even when rubbish bins were nearby. Littering of cigarette butts was more common in the evening, where 85.8% of smokers were observed littering, compared with the afternoon, when 68.1% were observed littering. [69] In addition, 73.5% of smokers did not extinguish their butts, making them fire hazards. [69]

Environmental impact

The toxic chemicals within cigarettes raise environmental concerns. Cigarette butts primarily consist of plastic. They are made up of cellulose acetate which contains numerous chemicals. While cigarette butts can take up to 10 years to completely decompose, the chemicals they release last longer in the environment. [70] The leachate chemicals in littered cigarettes butts have also been shown to pose acute or chronic ecological harm to marine life. [71]

Behavioural interventions

To address the issue of cigarette butt littering, New Zealand's office of the prime minister's chief science advisor has cited research which states that: [72] [73]

"There is a need to change perceptions about cigarette butts as harmless litter."

A series of behavioural strategies have been suggested by the office of the prime minister's chief science advisor to reduce cigarette butt litter. The strategies involve:

  1. creating a suitable environment for the correct disposal of cigarette butts with signage on pathways directing smokers to the nearest bin.
  2. fostering a feeling of pride and ownership in smokers to maintain a clean environment and thereby encourage a commitment to dispose of their cigarette butts in a bin
  3. implementing positive social norming so that the binning of cigarette butts becomes standard practice.
  4. warning smokers of the consequences of littering. This means raising awareness about fines, implementing enforcement officers to monitor and speak to smokers and thereby increase recognition of cigarette butts as a form of litter. [72]

These strategies were trialled by Australia's NSW Environment Protection Authority (EPA) across 40 smoking sights. All the strategies led to an increased rate of binning cigarette butts. Fostering a feeling of pride and ownership was the most effective strategy but creating signage on pathways was considered the simplest and most cost-effective intervention. [72]

In 2019, New Zealand launched a No Butts campaign. The purpose of the campaign is to emphasise the negative impact of littering cigarette butts and to promote the correct disposal of butts. [74]

Response

Fines

Under the Offences and Penalties section of the Litter Act 1979, anyone who deposits litter in or on a public place or on private land without the occupier's consent can be fined. [75] The fines for rubbish dumping and littering in Auckland and Wellington range from NZ$100 to NZ$400. [76] [77]

The dumping of rubbish on public conservation land in New Zealand warrants a fine of up to $100,000 or up to two years' imprisonment. [78] The Department of Conservation also has the authority to issue infringement notices for minor cases of littering. Penalties for littering on public conservation land result in a $300 infringement fee. [78]

Restrictions to freedom camping in New Zealand were introduced to Parliament in 2011 with the Freedom Camping Bill. The bill passes a $200 instant fine for Illegal camping and another fine of up to $10,000 for the illegal emptying of a campervans sewage. [79]

Cigarette butt littering

Policy measures in New Zealand aim to reduce the littering of cigarette butts. The littering of cigarette butts is the most prevalent form of rubbish pollution in NZ. [60] [56] [61] Due to the prevalence of littered cigarette butts, a conflict has existed over the fines it should warrant. [80] In 2017, Wellington City Council discussed whether the littering of cigarette butts should be subject to more expensive fines than other forms of litter. In 2018, a consultation addressed the creation of a specific bylaw. This bylaw would present the littering of cigarette butts as an offence. [80] [81] The consultation process revealed that 85% of responses were in favour of the bylaw and 14% were in opposition. [82] The introduction of the bylaw was criticised by some members of the council because they believed it was impossible to enforce. [83] [84]

In May 2018, the Wellington City Council Strategy Committee voted to repeal the clause. Councillor Brian Dawson claimed that the most effective way to reduce cigarette butt litter was to reduce the number of people smoking. [85] In 2019, Wellington City Council launched the Smokefree Wellington Action Plan in support of the government's Smokefree Aotearoa 2025 campaign. [86] [87] This government plan was established in 2011 which, amongst health incentives, plans on preventing and ultimately ending cigarette butt litter nationally. [88]

Public rubbish bins

Overflowing rubbish bin at sports stadium Overflowing rubbish bin at sports stadium.jpg
Overflowing rubbish bin at sports stadium

According to the Keep New Zealand Beautiful Litter Behaviour Study, bin use was recorded to be at a nationally high rate. Cigarettes were the only item observed to be littered more than binned. [89] In addition, a litter behaviour survey revealed that 33% of respondents thought the best way to prevent littering would be to provide more bins. [40] In 2020, Christchurch city council launched "smart bins". [90] The smart bins replaced traditional rubbish bins in 2021. They were designed to prevent the overflow of rubbish. With a secure design and sensor technology, the smart bins would be able detect the amount of rubbish being disposed and therefore be emptied by council staff before they overflowed. [91] In November 2021, the Banks Peninsula settlement of Akaroa reported overflowing bins and an increase in littering due to jammed bins, lack of staff and not enough smart bins to replace traditional bins. [91]

Another approach to litter abatement in New Zealand has been the removal of bins. In 2019, the city of Whangārei removed bins from three of its beaches. The primary incentive behind removing the bins was to avoid illegal dumping. [92] Since removing the bins, the Whangārei District Council has reported a reduction in the amount of litter found on the beaches. [92]

Reducing the impact of plastic

The New Zealand Ministry for the Environment has stated that single-use plastics items are more likely to be littered than other items. This is because they are considered inexpensive, ubiquitous, and not designed for reuse. [93]  

With the aim of reducing plastic and its impact on the environment, the Office of the Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor released a Rethinking Plastics in Aotearoa New Zealand Report in 2019. In 2020, the New Zealand government agreed to further investigate the environmental impact of plastic and develop a national plastics action plan. [94] The aim of the National Plastics Action Plan is to help New Zealand develop into a low-waste economy. [95] As of 2021, the Action Plan sets out a new system of plastic production and use for the future of New Zealand. This new system is designed to be sustainable, beneficial to society and help New Zealand eventually achieve a low-carbon circular economy. [96] : 6  In order to achieve these objectives, the action plan aims to minimise plastic use to a sustainable level through behavioral reform. To achieve a circular economy, it also aims to put better systems in place for the efficient reuse, repairing and recycling of plastic materials. [96] Overall, the National Plastics Action Plan has invested approximately $100 million in resource recovery infrastructure. [97]

Plastic bag ban

Single-use plastic shopping bags Plastic bags.jpg
Single-use plastic shopping bags

To reduce plastic pollution, the New Zealand government banned single-use plastic bags on 1 July 2019. [98] The "mandatory phase out" of all single-use plastic bags was first introduced by the Ministry for the Environment in 2018. [99] The plastic bag ban means that no businesses in New Zealand can sell, distribute or in any way provide customers with single-use plastic shopping bags. [100]

Anti-litter campaigns

Keep New Zealand Beautiful

Keep New Zealand Beautiful
Founded atBotany, Auckland
TypeNon-profit organisation
Registration no.218445
Legal statusIncorporated Society
PurposeLitter abatement
Websitewww.knzb.org.nz
Formerly called
New Zealand Litter Control Council

The most recognised anti-litter organisation in New Zealand is Keep New Zealand Beautiful, originally established by government in 1967 as the Anti-Litter Council. With the passing of the Litter Act in 1979, the council became an Incorporated Society under the name New Zealand Litter Control Council, and was officially recognised in the Act as the primary body responsible for promotion of litter control in New Zealand. [101] In 1984, the organisation adopted a more community-based approach to the problem of littering and changed its name to the Keep New Zealand Beautiful Society Inc. Since its foundation in 1967, Keep New Zealand Beautiful has created nationally recognised educational campaigns to promote litter abatement. Anti-litter campaigns additionally address further issues like climate action, reducing environmental pollution and protecting biodiversity. [102]  

Popular campaigns launched by Keep New Zealand Beautiful include ‘Be a Tidy Kiwi’ and ‘Do the Right Thing.’ Other programmes include:  

  • Kiki Kiwi & Friends Litter Less Programme
  • Young reporters Litter Less Programme
  • Clean up Week
  • Community clean ups
  • Tidy Kiwi Volunteer of the Month
  • Beautiful Awards [103]

The National Litter Hub

The National Litter Hub is a resource launched by Keep New Zealand Beautiful. It allows people in New Zealand to access information regarding litter disposal and recycling policies around the country. [104] This resource was created in response to survey results which were recorded in the National Litter Behaviour Study in 2018.

The Litter Intelligence Programme

The Litter Intelligence Programme [105] is an educational initiative developed by the New Zealand-based charity Sustainable Coastlines. [106] The programme was launched in May 2018 and is funded by the Waste Minimisation Fund which is administered by the New Zealand Ministry for the Environment. [105] The Programme focuses on beach litter and functions as both a citizen science project and a school education programme. [107] On a local level the programme addresses the issue of litter through behavioural reform. It aims to encourage schools and citizens to address and measure the environmental impact of litter. On a national level, it aims to create a national litter database. [108] The Litter Intelligence Programme uses a localised version of the monitoring methodology established by the United Nations Environment Programme. [105]

According to Camden Howitt, co-founder and Coastlines Lead at Sustainable Coastlines: [107]

“robust environmental monitoring programmes are few and far between, and where they do exist, communities are seldom engaged with the monitoring work and data that inform the decisions that shape their communities.”

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaikōura</span> Town in the South Island of New Zealand

Kaikōura is a town on the east coast of the South Island of New Zealand. It is located on State Highway 1, 180 km north of Christchurch. The town has an estimated permanent resident population of 2,330.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Prebble</span> New Zealand politician

Richard William Prebble is a former member of the New Zealand Parliament. Initially a member of the Labour Party, he joined the newly formed ACT New Zealand party under Roger Douglas in 1996, becoming its leader from 1996 to 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bank of New Zealand</span> Financial institution in New Zealand

Bank of New Zealand (BNZ) is one of New Zealand's big four banks and has been operating in the country since the first office was opened in Auckland in October 1861 followed shortly after by the first branch in Dunedin in December 1861. The bank operates a variety of financial services covering retail, business and institutional banking and employs over 5,000 people in New Zealand. In 1992 the bank was purchased by the National Australia Bank and has since then operated as a subsidiary, but it retains local governance with a New Zealand board of directors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Litter</span> Waste products disposed of incorrectly, without consent, at an inappropriate location

Litter consists of waste products that have been discarded incorrectly, without consent, at an unsuitable location. The word litter can also be used as a verb: to litter means to drop and leave objects, often man-made, such as aluminum cans, paper cups, food wrappers, cardboard boxes or plastic bottles on the ground, and leave them there indefinitely or for other people to dispose of as opposed to disposing of them correctly.

Penny Webster is a former mayor of Rodney District and a councillor on the Auckland Council. As mayor of Rodney she headed one of the six main local government entities generally considered as making up the Auckland metropolitan area, with her district being the northernmost entity. All of these entities were merged into the new Auckland Council in 2010. She was also a former New Zealand politician: an MP from 1999 to 2002, representing the ACT New Zealand party.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Keep America Beautiful</span> Nonprofit organization

Keep America Beautiful is a nonprofit organization founded in 1953. It is the largest community improvement organization in the United States, with more than 700 state and community-based affiliate organizations and more than 1,000 partner organizations.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic shopping bag</span> Type of shopping bag

Plastic shopping bags, carrier bags, or plastic grocery bags are a type of plastic bag used as shopping bags and made from various kinds of plastic. In use by consumers worldwide since the 1960s, these bags are sometimes called single-use bags, referring to carrying items from a store to a home. However, it is rare for bags to be worn out after single use and in the past some retailers incentivised customers to reuse 'single use' bags by offering loyalty points to those doing so. Even after they are no longer used for shopping, reuse for storage or trash is common, and modern plastic shopping bags are increasingly recyclable or compostable. In recent decades, numerous countries have introduced legislation restricting the provision of plastic bags, in a bid to reduce littering and plastic pollution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine debris</span> Human-created solid waste in the sea or ocean

Marine debris, also known as marine litter, is human-created waste that has deliberately or accidentally been released in a sea or ocean. Floating oceanic debris tends to accumulate at the center of gyres and on coastlines, frequently washing aground, when it is known as beach litter or tidewrack. Deliberate disposal of wastes at sea is called ocean dumping. Naturally occurring debris, such as driftwood and drift seeds, are also present. With the increasing use of plastic, human influence has become an issue as many types of (petrochemical) plastics do not biodegrade quickly, as would natural or organic materials. The largest single type of plastic pollution (~10%) and majority of large plastic in the oceans is discarded and lost nets from the fishing industry. Waterborne plastic poses a serious threat to fish, seabirds, marine reptiles, and marine mammals, as well as to boats and coasts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cigarette filter</span> Filter in cigarettes that reduce nicotine, tar and carbon monoxide

A cigarette filter, also known as a filter tip, is a component of a cigarette, along with cigarette paper, capsules and adhesives. Filters were introduced in the early 1950s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kerbside collection</span>

Kerbside collection or curbside collection is a service provided to households, typically in urban and suburban areas, of collecting and disposing of household waste and recyclables. It is usually accomplished by personnel using specially built vehicles to pick up household waste in containers that are acceptable to, or prescribed by, the municipality and are placed on the kerb.

Keep Northern Ireland Beautiful (KNIB), known until 2014 as TIDY Northern Ireland, is a non-profit environmental organisation based in Northern Ireland. In addition to running the "Keep Northern Ireland Tidy" campaign, it supports or provides grants for local environmental programmes such as the 'Beautiful Beach Awards', litter surveys, a 'Marine Litter Report', local gardening projects, an Eco-Schools program, Green Coast Awards, TIDY Business and Borough Cleanliness Survey. The organisation is registered as a charity with the Charity Commission for Northern Ireland and, as of 2022, had 13 employees.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT in New Zealand</span>

New Zealand society is generally accepting of lesbian, gay, bisexual and transgender (LGBT) peoples. The LGBT-friendly environment is epitomised by the fact that there are several members of Parliament who belong to the LGBT community, LGBT rights are protected by the Human Rights Act, and same-sex couples are able to marry as of 2013. Sex between men was decriminalised in 1986. New Zealand has an active LGBT community, with well-attended annual gay pride festivals in most cities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marine plastic pollution</span> Environmental pollution by plastics

Marine plastic pollution is a type of marine pollution by plastics, ranging in size from large original material such as bottles and bags, down to microplastics formed from the fragmentation of plastic material. Marine debris is mainly discarded human rubbish which floats on, or is suspended in the ocean. Eighty percent of marine debris is plastic. Microplastics and nanoplastics result from the breakdown or photodegradation of plastic waste in surface waters, rivers or oceans. Recently, scientists have uncovered nanoplastics in heavy snow, more specifically about 3,000 tons that cover Switzerland yearly.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smoking in New Zealand</span> Overview of smoking in New Zealand

The use of tobacco for smoking in New Zealand has been subjected to government regulation for a number of decades. On 10 December 2004, New Zealand became the third country in the world to make all indoor workplaces including bars and restaurants smoke-free.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waste in New Zealand</span>

The management of waste in New Zealand has become more regulated to reduce associated environmental issues. According to OECD data, New Zealand is the third most wasteful country in the OECD.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pollution in New Zealand</span> Overview of pollution in New Zealand

Pollution is an environmental issue in New Zealand with a number of measures being taken to reduce its severity. New Zealand is sometimes viewed as being "clean and green" but this can be refuted due to pollution levels, among other factors. New Zealand does have a relatively low air pollution level, but some areas have high levels of plastic pollution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cigarette receptacle</span> Container for discarding cigarette waste

A cigarette receptacle is a container or device for extinguishing and disposing of cigarette waste. Other common names for cigarette receptacles include: ash urns, ash pans, cigarette butt receptacles, butt bins, butt holders, snuffers, smokers poles, cigarette waste receptacles, smokers waste receptacles, and ash/trash combinations. Originally provided as a courtesy to smokers in public places, cigarette receptacles are now commonplace as smoking bans and designated smoking areas require proper disposal methods. A typical receptacle can hold hundreds — even thousands — of disposed cigarette butts.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Plastic pollution</span> Accumulation of plastic in natural ecosystems

Plastic pollution is the accumulation of plastic objects and particles in the Earth's environment that adversely affects humans, wildlife and their habitat. Plastics that act as pollutants are categorized by size into micro-, meso-, or macro debris. Plastics are inexpensive and durable, making them very adaptable for different uses; as a result, manufacturers choose to use plastic over other materials. However, the chemical structure of most plastics renders them resistant to many natural processes of degradation and as a result they are slow to degrade. Together, these two factors allow large volumes of plastic to enter the environment as mismanaged waste which persists in the ecosystem and travels throughout food webs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Waste management in Australia</span> Waste management in Australia

Waste management in Australia started to be implemented as a modern system by the second half of the 19th century, with its progresses driven by technological and sanitary advances. It is currently regulated at both federal and state level. The Commonwealth's Department of the Environment and Energy is responsible for the national legislative framework.

References

  1. 1 2 Woolf, Amber-Leigh (28 September 2018). "Litter by Little: 'Do the right thing' mantra seems to have died". Stuff. Archived from the original on 17 December 2021. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  2. ↑ Zaki, Anan (3 September 2019). "Over 10 billion cigarette butts pollute country's ecosystem". RNZ. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  3. ↑ "How does litter harm the environment?". Unisan UK. 19 June 2020. Archived from the original on 5 January 2022. Retrieved 5 January 2022.
  4. 1 2 "Overview". National Litter Audit (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. 2019. p. 17. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  5. ↑ JonoB. "Litter intelligence". Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  6. 1 2 Royal Society New Zealand (2019). "The marine environment: plastics final destination?". Plastics in the Environment (PDF). Wellington: Royal Society Te Apārangi. p. 22. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  7. ↑ Plastics in the Environment (PDF). Wellington: Royal Society Te Apārangi. 2019. p. 19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  8. 1 2 Ministry for the Environment, Stats NZ (2019). "Our activities on land are polluting our marine environment- Litter on our beaches". New Zealand's Environmental Reporting Series: Our marine environment 2019 (PDF). Wellington: Stats NZ. p. 30. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  9. 1 2 Ministry for the Environment, Stats NZ (2019). "Our marine environment at a glance". New Zealand's Environmental Reporting Series: Our marine environment 2019 (PDF). Wellington: Stats NZ. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  10. ↑ Statistics New Zealand (17 October 2019). "New Zealand marine report warns of effects of climate change and other issues on oceans and coasts | Stats NZ". www.stats.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 1 January 2022. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
  11. 1 2 3 Ministry for the Environment, Stats NZ (2019). "Litter and plastic debris is pervasive". New Zealand's Environmental Reporting Series: Our marine environment 2019 (PDF). Wellington: Stats NZ. p. 29. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  12. 1 2 Ministry for the Environment, Stats NZ (2019). "Our activities on land are polluting our marine environment- Ingesting plastics has many effects on marine animals". New Zealand's Environmental Reporting Series: Our marine environment 2019 (PDF). Stats NZ. p. 31. Archived (PDF) from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  13. ↑ Department of Conservation, New Zealand Government. "Threats facing our oceans- Pollution and microplastics". www.doc.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  14. 1 2 Royal Society New Zealand (2019). "Toxic chemicals associated with plastics and absorbed pollutants". Plastics in the Environment (PDF). Wellington: Royal Society NZ. pp. 32–33. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  15. ↑ Royal Society New Zealand (2019). "How plastics affect human and animal health, and the environment". Plastics in the Environment (PDF). Wellington: Royal Society NZ. pp. 31–32. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  16. ↑ Department of Conservation, New Zealand Government. "Threats caused by people". www.doc.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  17. ↑ Royal Society New Zealand (2019). "Ingestion of plastics by animals". Plastics in the Environment (PDF). Wellington: Royal Society NZ. p. 31. Archived (PDF) from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  18. ↑ Harper, P.C. and J.A. Fowler, Plastic pellets in New Zealand storm-killed prions (Pachyptila spp.). 1987.
  19. 1 2 "Plastics and the environment". Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor. 2019. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
  20. ↑ Taonga, New Zealand Ministry for Culture and Heritage Te Manatu. "Seabird capital of the world". teara.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  21. 1 2 NZ Herald (20 July 2018). "How plastic threatens NZ seabirds". NZ Herald. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  22. ↑ "Plastics and the environment". Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  23. ↑ Forest & Bird (2 July 2018). "NZ seas worst in world for seabirds eating plastic | Forest and Bird". www.forestandbird.org.nz. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
  24. ↑ Newshub (2 July 2018). "NZ oceans world's worst for birds eating plastic". Newshub. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 1 January 2022.
  25. 1 2 3 4 Department of Conservation, New Zealand Government (15 January 2019). "Hide your snacks: Litter and our birds | Conservation blog". blog.doc.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 15 January 2022. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  26. ↑ "Litter Act 1979 No 41 (as at 28 October 2021), Public Act 2 Interpretation" (PDF). www.legislation.govt.nz. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
  27. ↑ "Litter Act 1979 No 41 (as at 28 October 2021), Public Act 4 Responsibility for promotion of litter control". www.legislation.govt.nz. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
  28. ↑ "Litter Control Officers". New Zealand Legislation. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 20 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  29. 1 2 "Other Litter Control Officers". New Zealand Legislation. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 20 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  30. 1 2 3 "Powers and duties of Officers". New Zealand Legislation. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 20 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  31. 1 2 "Litter Wardens". New Zealand Legislation. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 2021. Archived from the original on 20 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  32. 1 2 "Receptacles to be provided in public places". New Zealand Legislation. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 20 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  33. 1 2 "Litter Act 1979 No 41 (as at 28 October 2021), Public Act 11 Local or public authority may make grants, etc, for the abatement or prevention of litter". www.legislation.govt.nz. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 12 December 2021.
  34. ↑ "Public authorities may make bylaws". New Zealand Legislation. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 20 December 2021. Retrieved 20 December 2021.
  35. 1 2 "Litter Amendment Act 2006". New Zealand Legisation. 27 June 2006. Archived from the original on 22 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  36. ↑ "Litter Act 1979 No 41 (as at 28 October 2021), Public Act 15 Deposit of litter in public place or on private land". www.legislation.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  37. ↑ Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). Litter Behaviour Study Report (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 1. Archived from the original on 10 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  38. 1 2 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Introduction". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 7. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  39. ↑ Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Methodology". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary. Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 11. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  40. 1 2 3 4 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Executive Summary". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 6. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  41. ↑ Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Methodology". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 8. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  42. 1 2 3 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Methodology- 2.1 Observational Approach". National Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 8. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  43. 1 2 3 4 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Methodology- 2.3 New Zealand Fieldwork". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 10. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  44. ↑ Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Results- 3.1 National DBI". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary. Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 11. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  45. 1 2 3 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Methodology- 2.2 Disposal Behaviour Index". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 9. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  46. 1 2 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Results- 3.4 Litter rate". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 16. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  47. 1 2 3 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Results- 3.9 Attitudes and disposal behaviour". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 25. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  48. ↑ Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. pp. 6, 26. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  49. 1 2 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Results- 3.13 Demographics". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 31. Archived from the original on 10 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  50. 1 2 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Executive Summary". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 6. Archived from the original on 10 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  51. ↑ "National Litter Audit 2019". Keep New Zealand Beautiful. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  52. ↑ "Keep NZ Beautiful Announces National Litter Audit Results". Scoop. 3 September 2019. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  53. ↑ "Background and Content". The National Litter Audit (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. 2019. pp. 23–29. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  54. 1 2 3 "Comparisons by site types". The National Litter Audit (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. 2019. p. 27. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  55. ↑ "Main material Characteristics". National Litter Audit (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. 2019. p. 32. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  56. 1 2 3 "The Dirty Dozen". National Litter Audit (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. 2019. p. 37. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  57. ↑ "The Dirty Dozen". National Litter Audit (PDF). Keep New Zealand Beautiful. 2019. p. 39. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  58. ↑ "The Dirty Dozen". National litter Audit (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. 2019. p. 41. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  59. ↑ "Annual Update of Key Results 2020/21: New Zealand Health Survey". Ministry of Health NZ. Archived from the original on 6 January 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  60. 1 2 Patel, Vimal; W Thomson, George (January 2013). "Cigarette butt littering in city streets: a new methodology for studying and results". Tobacco Control. BMJ. 22 (1): 59–62. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050529. JSTOR   43289299. PMID   22821749. S2CID   28270886. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021– via JSTOR.
  61. 1 2 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Results". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 30. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  62. ↑ Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "Results". Litter Behaviour Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 17. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  63. ↑ "Wellington councillors divided over fines for dropping cigarette butts". NZ Herald. 5 October 2017. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021.
  64. ↑ "Smoking and the Environment – How Smoking Harms the Planet". Tobacco-Free Life. Archived from the original on 2 January 2022. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
  65. ↑ Novotny, T.E. & Zhao, F. (1999). Consumption and production waste: another externality of tobacco use. Tobacco Control, 8, 75–80.
  66. 1 2 Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "binned versus littered". National Litter Behaviour Research (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 21. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2 January 2022. Retrieved 2 January 2022.
  67. ↑ JonoB (6 November 2019). "Reducing cigarette butt litter". Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor. Archived from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
  68. 1 2 Yates, Sunshine (2018). "3.12 Self-awareness and frankness about littering". National Litter Behaviour Research (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. pp. 29–30. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  69. 1 2 Patel, Vimal; Thomson, George W (January 2013). "Cigarette butt littering in city streets: a new methodology for studying and results". Tobacco Control. BMJ. 22 (1): 60. doi:10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2012-050529. JSTOR   43289299. PMID   22821749. S2CID   28270886. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 16 December 2021– via JSTOR.
  70. ↑ "Tiny but deadly: Cigarette butts are the most commonly polluted plastic". Earth Day. 28 August 2020. Archived from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 4 January 2022.
  71. ↑ Venugopal, P. Dilip; Hanna, Shannon K.; Gagliano, Gregory G.; Chang, Hoshing W. (January 2021). "No Butts on the Beach: Aquatic Toxicity of Cigarette Butt Leachate Chemicals". Tobacco Regulatory Science Group. 7 (1): 17–30. doi:10.18001/TRS.7.1.2. PMC   7849351 . PMID   33532516.
  72. 1 2 3 JonoB (6 November 2019). "Reducing cigarette butt litter". Prime Minister's Chief Science Advisor. Archived from the original on 4 January 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  73. ↑ Torkashvand et al., (2019) “A Systematic Review on Cigarette Butt Management as a Hazardous Waste and Prevalent Litter: Control and Recycling,” Environmental Science and Pollution Research 26, no. 12
  74. ↑ Woolf, Amber-Leigh (10 September 2019). "'No Butts' campaign launched to combat our most common litter – cigarette butts". Stuff. Archived from the original on 6 January 2022. Retrieved 6 January 2022.
  75. ↑ "Litter Act 1979 No 41 (as at 28 October 2021), Public Act 15 Deposit of litter in public place or on private land". www.legislation.govt.nz. Parliamentary Counsel Office, New Zealand Government. 2 November 1979. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  76. ↑ "Fines for rubbish dumping and littering". Auckland Council. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  77. ↑ "Part 5: Public Places, 23.2 Litter". Wellington City Council. 7 August 2018. Archived from the original on 15 December 2021. Retrieved 15 December 2021.
  78. 1 2 Department of Conservation, New Zealand Government (26 January 2021). "Rubbish dumping taints sacred Tainui site". www.doc.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  79. ↑ Department of Conservation, New Zealand Government (15 May 2011). "New freedom camping laws announced". www.doc.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 30 December 2021. Retrieved 30 December 2021.
  80. 1 2 "Wellington councillors divided over fines for dropping cigarette butts". NZ Herald. 5 October 2017. Archived from the original on 16 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  81. ↑ Original Document Report for Public Places Bylaw Review 2017 (PDF). Wellington City Council. 2018. pp. 1–97. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  82. ↑ Ordinary Meeting of City Strategy Committee Agenda (PDF). Wellington City Council. 3 May 2018. pp. 7–8. Archived (PDF) from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  83. ↑ Devlin, Collette (5 October 2017). "Wellington City Council votes for a bylaw it knows it can't enforce". Stuff. Archived from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  84. ↑ "#Buttgate: Wellington council official apologises for slamming cigarette bylaw". Newshub. Archived from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  85. ↑ "Cigarette butt bylaw scrapped by Wellington City Council". NZ Herald. Archived from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  86. ↑ "Smokefree Wellington". Wellington City Council. 6 October 2021. Archived from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  87. ↑ Ordinary Meeting of City Strategy Committee Agenda (PDF). Wellington City Council. 2019. pp. 27–102. Archived (PDF) from the original on 25 December 2021. Retrieved 25 December 2021.
  88. ↑ "History of Smokefree Aotearoa 2025". Ministry of Health NZ. Archived from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  89. ↑ Sunshine Yates Consulting (2018). "3.7- Littered versus binned". Litter Behaviour Study Executive Summary (PDF). Auckland: Keep New Zealand Beautiful. p. 20. Archived (PDF) from the original on 12 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  90. ↑ "Smart Bins". Smart Christchurch – Share. Connect. Innovate. Archived from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  91. 1 2 "Are Christchurch's new smart bins really that smart?". Stuff. 18 November 2021. Archived from the original on 23 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  92. 1 2 "Whangārei bans bins at beaches in a NZ-first bid to curb rubbish – and it's working". 1 News. Archived from the original on 22 December 2021. Retrieved 23 December 2021.
  93. ↑ Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand Government (2020). "Problems with single-use plastic items". Reducing the impact of plastic on our environment-moving away from hard-to-recycle and single-use items (PDF). Wellington: Ministry for the Environment. pp. 18–19. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  94. ↑ Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand Government (2020). "Government response". Rethinking Plastics in Aotearoa New Zealand- Government response to the Rethinking Plastics report (PDF). Wellington: New Zealand Government. p. 4. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  95. ↑ Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand Government (2021). National Plastics Action Plan for Aotearoa New Zealand (PDF). Wellington: New Zealand Government. p. 3. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  96. 1 2 Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand Government (2021). "Our future plastics system". National Plastics Action Plan for Aotearoa New Zealand (PDF). Wellington: New Zealand Government. p. 6. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  97. ↑ Ministry for the Environment, New Zealand Government (2021). "Transforming our waste system". National Plastics Action Plan for Aotearoa New Zealand (PDF). Wellington: New Zealand Government. p. 7. Archived (PDF) from the original on 29 December 2021. Retrieved 29 December 2021.
  98. ↑ "Ban on plastic bags from 1 July 2019". Ban on plastic bags from 1 July 2019. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  99. ↑ "Proposed mandatory phase out of single-use plastic shopping bags: Consultation document". Ministry for the Environment. 1 August 2018. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  100. ↑ "New Zealand Plastic bag ban". Ministry for the Environment. 1 July 2019. Archived from the original on 24 December 2021. Retrieved 24 December 2021.
  101. ↑ "Our story". Keep New Zealand Beautiful. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  102. ↑ "Our story". Keep New Zealand Beautiful. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  103. ↑ "Programmes". Keep New Zealand Beautiful. Archived from the original on 2 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  104. ↑ "Keep New Zealand Beautiful launches one-stop online litter platform". Keep New Zealand Beautiful. 19 June 2018. Archived from the original on 17 December 2021. Retrieved 17 December 2021.
  105. 1 2 3 "Litter Intelligence". Sustainable Coastlines. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  106. ↑ "Welcome to Sustainable Coastlines". Sustainable Coastlines. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  107. 1 2 "Case Study: Litter Intelligence Programme, New Zealand (on-going) – Commonwealth Bluecharter". bluecharter.thecommonwealth.org. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
  108. ↑ "Tracking beach litter thanks to citizen scientists | Stats NZ". www.stats.govt.nz. Archived from the original on 8 December 2021. Retrieved 8 December 2021.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.