Majiayao culture

Last updated
Majiayao culture
Majiayao map.svg
Geographical rangeupper Yellow River
Period Neolithic China
Datesc.3300 – c.2000 BC
Preceded by Yangshao culture (5000–3000 BC)
Followed by Qijia culture
Chinese name
Simplified Chinese 马家窑文化
Traditional Chinese 馬家窯文化
Transcriptions
Standard Mandarin
Hanyu Pinyin Mǎjiāyáo Wénhuà

The Majiayao culture was a group of neolithic communities who lived primarily in the upper Yellow River region in eastern Gansu, eastern Qinghai and northern Sichuan, China. [1] The culture existed from 3300 to 2000 BC. The Majiayao culture represents the first time that the upper Yellow River region was widely occupied by agricultural communities and it is famous for its painted pottery, which is regarded as a peak of pottery manufacturing at that time.

Contents

The Majiayao culture benefited from the warm and humid climatic conditions from the Late Glacial to the Middle Holocene, which led to flourishing agricultural production and rapid population growth. These conditions changed with the aridification of the Late Holocene, provoking material and cultural decline. [2]

The Majiayao culture may be associated with the expansion of early Sino-Tibetan peoples during the Neolithic. [3]

History

The archaeological site was first found in 1924 near the village of Majiayao in Lintao County, Gansu by Swedish archaeologist Johan Gunnar Andersson, who considered it part of the Yangshao culture. [1] [4] [5] Following the work of Xia Nai, the founder of modern archaeology in the People's Republic of China, it has since been considered a distinct culture, named after the original site, whereas previously it had been referred to as the "Gansu Yangshao" culture. [6] This culture developed from the middle Yangshao (Miaodigou) phase, through an intermediate Shilingxia phase. [1] The culture is often divided into three phases: Majiayao (3300–2500 BC), Banshan (2500–2300 BC) and Machang (2300–2000 BC). [7] [8]

At the end of the 3rd millennium BC, the Qijia culture succeeded the Majiayao culture at sites in three main geographic zones: eastern Gansu, central Gansu, and western Gansu/eastern Qinghai. [9]

Location

Majiayao phase (3300–2500 BC) sites are mostly found on terraces along: the upper Wei River valley; upper Bailong River valley; middle and lower Tao River and Daxia River valleys; upper Yellow River valley; the Huangshui River; and lower Datong River. [10]

Pottery

Anthropomorphic figure on a Majiayao culture painted pottery jar (3200-2000 BC) National Museum of China. Neolithic pottery jar with nude figure, Majiayao Culture,Qinghai,1974 (detail).jpg
Anthropomorphic figure on a Majiayao culture painted pottery jar (3200–2000 BC) National Museum of China.

The most distinctive artifacts of the Majiayao culture are the painted pottery. During the Majiayao phase, potters decorated their wares with designs in black pigment featuring sweeping parallel lines and dots. Pottery of the Banshan phase is distinguished by curvilinear designs using both black and red paints. Machang-phase pottery is similar, but often not as carefully finished. [14] Its development is associated with interaction between hunter-gatherers in the Qinghai region and the westward expansion of agricultural Yangshao people. [6]

In contrast to plain pottery, the Majiayao painted pottery was produced at large, centralised workshops. The largest Neolithic workshop found in China is at Baidaogouping, Gansu. [15] The manufacture of large amounts of painted pottery means there were professional craftspeople to produce it, which is taken to indicate increasing social complexity. [16] Control over the production process and quality declined by the Banshan phase, potentially due to greater demand for pottery to use in funeral rituals, similar to what Hung Ling-yu calls the "modern Wal-Mart syndrome". [17]

Pottery style emerging from the Yangshao culture spread to the Majiayao culture, and then further to Xinjiang and Central Asia. [18]

Symbolism

The Majiayao culture used a wide variety of symbols in its pottery, some of them abstract and geometric, including the well-known Neolithic symbol of the Swastika, [19] [20] some of them figurative, such as frontal and rather realistic anthropomorphic depictions, [11] [12] The Swastika symbol was particularly used during the final Majiayao Machang period (2300–2000 BC), and became a current symbol in Buddhism representing samsara . [19] The symbols include net patterns, eight-angled star patterns, connected-shell patterns, petal patterns, vortex patterns etc... [21] Many motifs were already known from the preceding Yangshao culture (5000–3000 BC). [22]

Bronze

Bronze knife found in Dongxiang, Gansu (dated 2900-2740 BC) Neolithic bronze knife, Majiayao Culture (3200-2000 BC), Gansu, 1978.jpg
Bronze knife found in Dongxiang, Gansu (dated 2900–2740 BC)
The Majiayao culture was part of the "Arc of the eastern Steppe", next to the Central Plain of China. Arc of the eastern Steppe, the Arc (with its three zones) and the Central Plains, with major sites.png
The Majiayao culture was part of the "Arc of the eastern Steppe", next to the Central Plain of China.
Neolithic cultures in China 3000-2000 BC Neolithicum 3000-2000.png
Neolithic cultures in China 3000–2000 BC

Bronze technology was imported to China from the steppes. [24] The oldest bronze object found in China was a knife found at a Majiayao site in Dongxiang, Gansu, and dated to 2900–2740 BC. [25] Further copper and bronze objects have been found at Machang-period sites in Gansu. [26] Metallurgy spread to the middle and lower Yellow River region in the late 3rd millennium BC. [27] Contacts between the Afanasievo culture and the Majiayao culture and the Qijia culture have been considered for the transmission of bronze technology. [28]

Introduction of pastoralism

Domesticated cattle, sheep, and goats first appear in Western Asia circa 8000 BC. Their introduction in China may have been through the Hexi Corridor during the Majiayao culture period, although an alternative may be a route through the Eurasian grasslands and then through the Mongolian plateau circa 3500–2500 BC. [29]

Climate changes

Scholars have come to the conclusion that the development of the Majiayao culture was highly related to climate changes. A group of scholars from Lanzhou University have researched climate changes during the Majiayao culture and the results indicate that the climate was wet during 5830 to 4900 BP, which promoted the development of early and middle Majiayao culture in eastern Qinghai province. However, from 4900 to 4700 BP, the climate underwent droughts in this area, which may be responsible for the decline and eastward movement of prehistoric cultures during the period of transition from early-mid to late Majiayao culture. [30]

The transition from Yangshao to Majiayao coincides, climatically, with the Piora Oscillation.[ citation needed ]

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Liu & Chen (2012), p. 232.
  2. Li, Yu; Zhang, Zhansen; Zhou, Xueru; Gao, Mingjun; Li, Haiye; Xue, Yaxin; Duan, Junjie (1 May 2023). "Paleo-environmental changes and human activities in Shiyang River Basin since the Late Glacial". Chinese Science Bulletin: 3884. doi:10.1360/TB-2022-0965. The long period of warm and humid climatic conditions from the Late Glacial to the Middle Holocene favoured the development and expansion of the Majiayao and Qijia cultures. This stable and agriculturally suitable climate was conducive to increased food production, which contributed to rapid population growth. However, the continuous aridification that began in the Late Holocene led to a decline in agricultural production and insufficient food and water supply, which hampered population growth and cultural development.
  3. Liu, Li; Chen, Jian; Wang, Jiajing; Zhao, Yanan; Chen, Xingcan (2022-12-20). "Archaeological evidence for initial migration of Neolithic Proto Sino-Tibetan speakers from Yellow River valley to Tibetan Plateau". Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences. 119 (51): e2212006119. doi:10.1073/pnas.2212006119. ISSN   0027-8424. PMC   9907151 . PMID   36508670.
  4. Andersson, Johan Gunnar (1943). Researches into the prehistory of the Chinese. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities. Vol. 15.
  5. Andersson, Johan Gunnar (1939). Topographical and Archaeological Studies in the Far East. Bulletin of the Museum of Far Eastern Antiquities. Vol. 11.
  6. 1 2 Hung 2011, p. 20.
  7. Liu & Chen (2012), pp. 216, 232.
  8. Dong, G.; et al. (2013). "The spatiotemporal pattern of the Majiayao cultural evolution and its relation to climate change and variety of subsistence strategy during late Neolithic period in Gansu and Qinghai Provinces, northwest China". Quaternary International. 316: 155–161. doi:10.1016/j.quaint.2013.07.038.
  9. Neolithic period Archived 2013-08-17 at the Wayback Machine -- Princeton University Art Museum
  10. Hung 2011, p. 27.
  11. 1 2 Childs-Johnson, Elizabeth (2020). The Oxford Handbook of Early China. Oxford University Press. p. 38. ISBN   978-0-19-932836-9.
  12. 1 2 Linduff, Katheryn M.; Sun, Yan (2004). Gender and Chinese Archaeology. Rowman Altamira. p. 42. ISBN   978-0-7591-0409-9.
  13. Insoll, Timothy (27 October 2011). The Oxford Handbook of the Archaeology of Ritual and Religion. OUP Oxford. p. 444. ISBN   978-0-19-923244-4.
  14. Valenstein (1989), pp. 6, 8.
  15. Hung 2011, p. 21.
  16. Hung 2011, p. 3–4.
  17. Hung 2011, p. 230.
  18. Zhang, Kai (4 February 2021). "The Spread and Integration of Painted pottery Art along the Silk Road". Region - Educational Research and Reviews. 3 (1): 18. doi: 10.32629/RERR.V3I1.242 . S2CID   234007445. The early cultural exchanges between the East and the West are mainly reflected in several aspects: first, in the late Neolithic period of painted pottery culture, the Yangshao culture (5000–3000 BC) from the Central Plains spreadwestward, which had a great impact on Majiayao culture (3000–2000 BC), and then continued to spread to Xinjiang and Central Asia through the transition of Hexi corridor
  19. 1 2 Guozhen, Wang (1 December 2019). Collection of Ancient Chinese Cultural Relics, Volume 1: Primitive Society (1.7 million - 4000 BC) and The Xia and Shang Dynasties (21st - 11th Century BC). ATF Press. pp. 123, 115, v. ISBN   978-1-925371-29-1. Four big circles are found on its belly, with the swastika pattern inside each circle.
  20. Yang, Xiaoneng (2000). Reflections of Early China: Decor, Pictographs, and Pictorial Inscriptions. Nelson-Atkins Museum of Art. ISBN   978-0-942614-30-5. Both a cross notation and a swastika symbol are popular decorative patterns and marks on Machang phase pottery vessels.
  21. Guozhen, Wang (1 December 2019). Collection of Ancient Chinese Cultural Relics, Volume 1: Primitive Society (1.7 million - 4000 BC) and The Xia and Shang Dynasties (21st - 11th Century BC). ATF Press. ISBN   978-1-925371-29-1.
  22. Zheng, Dekun (1982). Studies in Chinese Archaeology. Chinese University Press. ISBN   978-962-201-279-0.
  23. Rawson, Jessica (2020). "Chariotry and Prone Burials: Reassessing Late Shang China's Relationship with Its Northern Neighbours". Journal of World Prehistory. 33: 138–168.
  24. Rawson, Jessica (April 2017). "China and the steppe: reception and resistance". Antiquity. 91 (356): 375–388. doi:10.15184/aqy.2016.276. The development of several key technologies in China —bronze and iron metallurgy and horse-drawn chariots— arose out of the relations of central China, of the Erlitou period (c. 1700–1500 BC), the Shang (c.1500–1046 BC) and the Zhou (1046–771 BC) dynasties, with their neighbours in the steppe. Intermediaries in these exchanges were disparate groups in a broad border area of relatively high land around the heart of China, the Central Plains. The societies of central China were already so advanced that, when these foreign innovations were adopted, they were transformed within highly organised social and cultural systems.
  25. Bai (2003), p. 157.
  26. Liu & Chen (2012), p. 234.
  27. Liu (2005), p. 224.
  28. JIANJUN, MEI (2003). "Cultural Interaction between China and Central Asia during the Bronze Age" (PDF). Proceedings of the British Academy. 121: 1–39. the argument for possible Afanasievo-Xinjiang contact based on the finds at the Gumugou cemetery in the north-eastern rim of the Tarim basin would seem reasonable and needs to be kept open for the future archaeological finds. In other words, the possibility for the dispersal of early copperbased metallurgy from the Eurasian steppe into Xinjiang and further east to Gansu cannot be excluded at present and will have to be considered when further archaeological evidence becomes available.
  29. Ren, Lele; Yang, Yishi; Qiu, Menghan; Brunson, Katherine; Chen, Guoke; Dong, Guanghui (1 August 2022). "Direct dating of the earliest domesticated cattle and caprines in northwestern China reveals the history of pastoralism in the Gansu-Qinghai region". Journal of Archaeological Science. 144: 105627. doi:10.1016/j.jas.2022.105627. ISSN   0305-4403. Zooarchaeological and genetic research shows that the earliest domesticated cattle, sheep, and goats emerged in Western Asia and Northeast Africa at ∼10,000 cal BP (Loftus et al., 1994; Bradley et al., 1998; Zeder and Hesse, 2000; Marshall and Hildebrand 2002; Tong, 2004; Daly et al., 2018, 2021). During the past few decades, archaeologists have conducted many studies concerning the dating of the earliest domestic cattle, sheep, and goats in China (Yuan, 2015, 2021; Cai et al., 2018; Brunson et al., 2020; Hu, 2021). However, the timing and paths of early dispersal for domestic cattle and caprines into China are still unclear. One view is that domestic cattle and caprines were introduced into the Gansu-Qinghai (GQ) region from the Hexi Corridor during the Majiayao culture period (5600–5000BP), and then spread to other parts of China (Yuan, 2015, 2021). Another view is that domestic cattle and caprines spread eastward through the Eurasian grasslands, first passing through the Mongolian Plateau at ∼5500–4500 cal BP before moving south into China (Jaang 2015; Cai et al., 2018; Hu, 2021).
  30. "Climate Change; Researchers from Lanzhou University Describe Findings in Climate Change". The Business of Global Warming. Feb 20, 2012.

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hexi Corridor</span> Historical region in Gansu Province, China

The Hexi Corridor, also known as the Gansu Corridor, is an important historical region located in the modern western Gansu province of China. It refers to a narrow stretch of traversable and relatively arable plain west of the Yellow River's Ordos Loop, flanked between the much more elevated and inhospitable terrains of the Mongolian and Tibetan Plateaus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yangshao culture</span> 5000–3000 BC Chinese archaeological culture

The Yangshao culture was a Neolithic culture that existed extensively along the middle reaches of the Yellow River in China from around 5000 BC to 3000 BC. The culture is named after the Yangshao site, the first excavated site of this culture, which was discovered in 1921 in the town of Yangshao in western Henan by the Swedish geologist Johan Gunnar Andersson (1874–1960). The culture flourished mainly in Henan, as well as the neighboring provinces of Shaanxi and Shanxi.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Longshan culture</span> Late Neolithic culture in northern China

The Longshanculture, also sometimes referred to as the Black Pottery Culture, was a late Neolithic culture in the middle and lower Yellow River valley areas of northern China from about 3000 to 1900 BC. The first archaeological find of this culture took place at the Chengziya Archaeological Site in 1928, with the first excavations in 1930 and 1931. The culture is named after the nearby modern town of Longshan in Zhangqiu, Shandong. The culture was noted for its highly polished black pottery. The population expanded dramatically during the 3rd millennium BC, with many settlements having rammed earth walls. It decreased in most areas around 2000 BC until the central area evolved into the Bronze Age Erlitou culture. The Longshan culture has been linked to the early Sinitic . According to the area and cultural type, the Longshan culture can be divided into two types: Shandong Longshan and Henan Longshan. Among them, Shandong Longshan Cultural Site includes Chengziya Site; Henan Longshan Cultural Site includes Dengfeng Wangchenggang Site in Wangwan, Taosi Site and Mengzhuang Site in Hougang.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Erlitou culture</span> Bronze Age culture in China

The Erlitou culture was an early Bronze Age society and archaeological culture. It existed in the Yellow River valley from approximately 1900 to 1500 BC. A 2007 study using radiocarbon dating proposed a narrower date range of 1750–1530 BC. The culture is named after Erlitou, an archaeological site in Yanshi, Henan. It was widely spread throughout Henan and Shanxi and later appeared in Shaanxi and Hubei. Most archaeologists consider Erlitou the first state-level society in China. Chinese archaeologists generally identify the Erlitou culture as the site of the Xia dynasty, but there is no firm evidence, such as writing, to substantiate such a linkage, as the earliest evidence of Chinese writing dates to the Late Shang period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dawenkou culture</span> Chinese Neolithic culture

The Dawenkou culture was a Chinese Neolithic culture primarily located in the eastern province of Shandong, but also appearing in Anhui, Henan and Jiangsu. The culture existed from 4300 to 2600 BC, and co-existed with the Yangshao culture. Turquoise, jade and ivory artefacts are commonly found at Dawenkou sites. The earliest examples of alligator drums appear at Dawenkou sites. Neolithic signs, perhaps related to subsequent scripts, such as those of the Shang dynasty, have been found on Dawenkou pottery. Additionally, the Dawenkou practiced dental ablation and cranial deformation, practices that disappeared in China by the Chinese Bronze Age.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hemudu culture</span> Neolithic culture just south of Hangzhou Bay, China

The Hemudu culture was a Neolithic culture that flourished on the Chinese coast, just south of the Hangzhou Bay in Jiangnan in modern Yuyao, Zhejiang, China. The culture may be divided into early and late phases, before and after 4000 BC respectively. The site at Hemudu, 22 km northwest of Ningbo, was discovered in 1973. Hemudu sites were also discovered at Tianluoshan in Yuyao city, and on the islands of Zhoushan. Hemudu are said to have differed physically from inhabitants of the Yellow River sites to the north. Some authors propose that the Hemudu Culture was a source of the pre-Austronesian cultures.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banpo</span> Archaeological site in Shaanxi, China

Banpo is a Neolithic archaeological site located in the Yellow River valley, east of present-day Xi'an, China. Discovered in 1953 by Shi Xingbang, the site represents the first phase of the Yangshao culture and features the remains of several well organized settlements—including Jiangzhai, which has been radiocarbon dated to c. 4700 – c. 3600 BCE). An area of 5 to 6 hectares was surrounded by a ditch, probably a defensive moat 5 to 6 meters wide. The houses at Banpo were circular, built of mud and wood on low foundations, with overhanging thatched roofs. There also appear to have been communal burials.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Qijia culture</span> Bronze Age culture around the upper Yellow River region

The Qijia culture was an early Bronze Age culture distributed around the upper Yellow River region of Gansu and eastern Qinghai, China. It is regarded as one of the earliest bronze cultures in China.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Karuo culture</span> Neolithic culture in Tibet

The Karuo culture was a Neolithic culture in Tibet. The culture cultivated foxtail millet.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Shijiahe culture</span> Neolithic culture in China

The Shijiahe culture was a late Neolithic culture centered on the middle Yangtze River region in Shijiahe Town, Tianmen, Hubei Province, China. It succeeded the Qujialing culture in the same region and inherited its unique artefact of painted spindle whorls. Pottery figurines and distinct jade worked with advanced techniques were also common to the culture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dadiwan culture</span> 5800–5400 BC Chinese archaeological culture

The Dadiwan culture was a Neolithic culture located primarily in the eastern portion of Gansu and Shaanxi provinces in modern China. The culture takes its name from the deepest cultural layer found during the original excavation of the type site at Dadiwan. The remains of millet, pigs and dogs have been found in sites associated with the culture, which is itself defined by a thin-walled, cord-marked ceramic tradition sometimes referred to as Laoguantai. The Dadiwan culture shares a variety of common features, in pottery, architecture, and economy, with the Cishan and Peiligang cultures to the east.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">History of metallurgy in China</span>

Metallurgy in China has a long history, with the earliest metal objects in China dating back to around 3,000 BCE. The majority of early metal items found in China come from the North-Western Region. China was the earliest civilization to use the blast furnace and produce cast iron.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Banshan</span>

Banshan was a phase of the Chinese Neolithic Majiayao culture, c. 2600 to 2300 BC. The Banshan site is in Guanghe County, Gansu.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xindian culture</span> Bronze Age culture in China

Xindian culture was a Bronze Age culture in the Gansu and Qinghai provinces of China. Xindian culture is dated ca. 1500–1000 BCE, a radiocarbon testing of an artefact produced a date around 1000 BCE, which roughly corresponds to the Western Zhou period of the Central Plain area.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Siba culture</span> Bronze Age culture in Gansu, China, c. 1900–1500 BCE

The Siba culture, also called Huoshaogou culture (火烧沟), was a Bronze Age archaeological culture that flourished circa 1900 to 1500 BC in the Hexi Corridor, in Gansu Province of Northwest China. It was discovered in 1984 at Sibatan in Shandan County. Siba type pottery vessels are different from the others in Gansu. Siba produced painted pottery with coloured decorations; these were painted after the vessels had been fired. Similar pottery was used by the Tianshanbeilu culture at Hami basin to the west.

The earliest human occupation of what is now China dates to the Lower Paleolithic c. 1.7 million years ago—attested by archaeological finds such as the Yuanmou Man. The Erlitou and Erligang cultures inhabiting the Yellow River valley were Bronze Age civilizations predating the historical record—which first emerges c. 1250 – c. 1200 BCE at Yinxu, during the Late Shang.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Xichengyi culture</span> Bronze Age culture in Gansu, China, c. 900–200 BCE

The Xichengyi culture (Ch:西城驿文化) was an ancient culture in the central Heihe River region of the Hexi corridor, from 2,000 to 1,600 BCE. It is contemporary with the Qijia culture to its southeast. It succeeded the Majiayao culture in the area, and preceded the Siba culture.

Katherine Brunson is an Assistant Professor of Archaeology, affiliated with the departments of East Asian Studies and College of the Environment, at Wesleyan University in Connecticut, USA. She is a zooarchaeologist with a geographical focus on China, specializing in the ritual aspects of animal domestication, ancient DNA, and the origins of pastoralism. She has a particular interest in bone artifact production and is currently researching the origins of Chinese domestic cattle, the relationship between domestic cattle and extinct East Asian wild aurochs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Prehistoric Chinese religions</span>

Prehistoric Chinese religions are religious beliefs and practices of prehistoric peoples in China prior to the earliest intelligible writings in the region. They most prominently comprise spiritual traditions of Neolithic and early Bronze Age cultures in various regions of China, which preceded the ancient religions documented by early Chinese dynasties. While many cultures shared similar faith and practices, each developed distinct features in its religious life. Modern studies of these religions are difficult due to the absence of written records in prehistoric Chinese cultures.

References