Orbital magnetization

Last updated

In quantum mechanics, orbital magnetization, Morb, refers to the magnetization induced by orbital motion of charged particles, usually electrons in solids. The term "orbital" distinguishes it from the contribution of spin degrees of freedom, Mspin, to the total magnetization. A nonzero orbital magnetization requires broken time-reversal symmetry, which can occur spontaneously in ferromagnetic and ferrimagnetic materials, or can be induced in a non-magnetic material by an applied magnetic field.

Contents

Definitions

The orbital magnetic moment of a finite system, such as a molecule, is given classically by [1]

where J(r) is the current density at point r. (Here SI units are used; in Gaussian units, the prefactor would be 1/2c instead, where c is the speed of light.) In a quantum-mechanical context, this can also be written as

where −e and me are the charge and mass of the electron, Ψ is the ground-state wave function, and L is the angular momentum operator. The total magnetic moment is

where the spin contribution is intrinsically quantum-mechanical and is given by

where gs is the electron spin g-factor, μB is the Bohr magneton, ħ is the reduced Planck constant, and S is the electron spin operator.

The orbital magnetization M is defined as the orbital moment density; i.e., orbital moment per unit volume. For a crystal of volume V composed of isolated entities (e.g., molecules) labelled by an index j having magnetic moments morb, j, this is

However, real crystals are made up out of atomic or molecular constituents whose charge clouds overlap, so that the above formula cannot be taken as a fundamental definition of orbital magnetization. [2] Only recently have theoretical developments led to a proper theory of orbital magnetization in crystals, as explained below.

Theory

Difficulties in the definition of orbital magnetization

For a magnetic crystal, it is tempting to try to define

where the limit is taken as the volume V of the system becomes large. However, because of the factor of r in the integrand, the integral has contributions from surface currents that cannot be neglected, and as a result the above equation does not lead to a bulk definition of orbital magnetization. [2]

Another way to see that there is a difficulty is to try to write down the quantum-mechanical expression for the orbital magnetization in terms of the occupied single-particle Bloch functions |ψnk of band n and crystal momentum k:

where p is the momentum operator, L = r × p, and the integral is evaluated over the Brillouin zone (BZ). However, because the Bloch functions are extended, the matrix element of a quantity containing the r operator is ill-defined, and this formula is actually ill-defined. [3]

Atomic sphere approximation

In practice, orbital magnetization is often computed by decomposing space into non-overlapping spheres centered on atoms (similar in spirit to the muffin-tin approximation), computing the integral of r × J(r) inside each sphere, and summing the contributions. [4] This approximation neglects the contributions from currents in the interstitial regions between the atomic spheres. Nevertheless, it is often a good approximation because the orbital currents associated with partially filled d and f shells are typically strongly localized inside these atomic spheres. It remains, however, an approximate approach.

Modern theory of orbital magnetization

A general and exact formulation of the theory of orbital magnetization was developed in the mid-2000s by several authors, first based on a semiclassical approach, [5] then on a derivation from the Wannier representation, [6] [7] and finally from a long-wavelength expansion. [8] The resulting formula for the orbital magnetization, specialized to zero temperature, is

where fnk is 0 or 1 respectively as the band energy Enk falls above or below the Fermi energy μ,

is the effective Hamiltonian at wavevector k, and

is the cell-periodic Bloch function satisfying

A generalization to finite temperature is also available. [3] [8] Note that the term involving the band energy Enk in this formula is really just an integral of the band energy times the Berry curvature. Results computed using the above formula have appeared in the literature. [9] A recent review summarizes these developments. [10]

Experiments

The orbital magnetization of a material can be determined accurately by measuring the gyromagnetic ratio γ, i.e., the ratio between the magnetic dipole moment of a body and its angular momentum. The gyromagnetic ratio is related to the spin and orbital magnetization according to

The two main experimental techniques are based either on the Barnett effect or the Einstein–de Haas effect. Experimental data for Fe, Co, Ni, and their alloys have been compiled. [11]

Related Research Articles

In physics, the C parity or charge parity is a multiplicative quantum number of some particles that describes their behavior under the symmetry operation of charge conjugation.

In probability theory and mathematical physics, a random matrix is a matrix-valued random variable—that is, a matrix in which some or all elements are random variables. Many important properties of physical systems can be represented mathematically as matrix problems. For example, the thermal conductivity of a lattice can be computed from the dynamical matrix of the particle-particle interactions within the lattice.

Time-dependent density-functional theory (TDDFT) is a quantum mechanical theory used in physics and chemistry to investigate the properties and dynamics of many-body systems in the presence of time-dependent potentials, such as electric or magnetic fields. The effect of such fields on molecules and solids can be studied with TDDFT to extract features like excitation energies, frequency-dependent response properties, and photoabsorption spectra.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hofstadter's butterfly</span> Fractal describing the theorised behaviour of electrons in a magnetic field

In condensed matter physics, Hofstadter's butterfly is a graph of the spectral properties of non-interacting two-dimensional electrons in a perpendicular magnetic field in a lattice. The fractal, self-similar nature of the spectrum was discovered in the 1976 Ph.D. work of Douglas Hofstadter and is one of the early examples of modern scientific data visualization. The name reflects the fact that, as Hofstadter wrote, "the large gaps [in the graph] form a very striking pattern somewhat resembling a butterfly."

The Bose–Hubbard model gives a description of the physics of interacting spinless bosons on a lattice. It is closely related to the Hubbard model that originated in solid-state physics as an approximate description of superconducting systems and the motion of electrons between the atoms of a crystalline solid. The model was introduced by Gersch and Knollman in 1963 in the context of granular superconductors. The model rose to prominence in the 1980s after it was found to capture the essence of the superfluid-insulator transition in a way that was much more mathematically tractable than fermionic metal-insulator models.

The Sudarshan-Glauber P representation is a suggested way of writing down the phase space distribution of a quantum system in the phase space formulation of quantum mechanics. The P representation is the quasiprobability distribution in which observables are expressed in normal order. In quantum optics, this representation, formally equivalent to several other representations, is sometimes preferred over such alternative representations to describe light in optical phase space, because typical optical observables, such as the particle number operator, are naturally expressed in normal order. It is named after George Sudarshan and Roy J. Glauber, who worked on the topic in 1963. Despite many useful applications in laser theory and coherence theory, the Sudarshan-Glauber P representation has the peculiarity that it is not always positive, and is not a bona-fide probability function.

The Gross–Pitaevskii equation describes the ground state of a quantum system of identical bosons using the Hartree–Fock approximation and the pseudopotential interaction model.

In quantum mechanics, the Pauli equation or Schrödinger–Pauli equation is the formulation of the Schrödinger equation for spin-½ particles, which takes into account the interaction of the particle's spin with an external electromagnetic field. It is the non-relativistic limit of the Dirac equation and can be used where particles are moving at speeds much less than the speed of light, so that relativistic effects can be neglected. It was formulated by Wolfgang Pauli in 1927.

In quantum information and quantum computing, a cluster state is a type of highly entangled state of multiple qubits. Cluster states are generated in lattices of qubits with Ising type interactions. A cluster C is a connected subset of a d-dimensional lattice, and a cluster state is a pure state of the qubits located on C. They are different from other types of entangled states such as GHZ states or W states in that it is more difficult to eliminate quantum entanglement in the case of cluster states. Another way of thinking of cluster states is as a particular instance of graph states, where the underlying graph is a connected subset of a d-dimensional lattice. Cluster states are especially useful in the context of the one-way quantum computer. For a comprehensible introduction to the topic see.

Within computational chemistry, the Slater–Condon rules express integrals of one- and two-body operators over wavefunctions constructed as Slater determinants of orthonormal orbitals in terms of the individual orbitals. In doing so, the original integrals involving N-electron wavefunctions are reduced to sums over integrals involving at most two molecular orbitals, or in other words, the original 3N dimensional integral is expressed in terms of many three- and six-dimensional integrals.

In quantum mechanics, specifically time-dependent density functional theory, the Runge–Gross theorem shows that for a many-body system evolving from a given initial wavefunction, there exists a one-to-one mapping between the potential in which the system evolves and the density of the system. The potentials under which the theorem holds are defined up to an additive purely time-dependent function: such functions only change the phase of the wavefunction and leave the density invariant. Most often the RG theorem is applied to molecular systems where the electronic density, ρ(r,t) changes in response to an external scalar potential, v(r,t), such as a time-varying electric field.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kicked rotator</span>

The kicked rotator, also spelled as kicked rotor, is a paradigmatic model for both Hamiltonian chaos and quantum chaos. It describes a free rotating stick in an inhomogeneous "gravitation like" field that is periodically switched on in short pulses. The model is described by the Hamiltonian

In physics, Berry connection and Berry curvature are related concepts which can be viewed, respectively, as a local gauge potential and gauge field associated with the Berry phase or geometric phase. The concept was first introduced by S. Pancharatnam as geometric phase and later elaborately explained and popularized by Michael Berry in a paper published in 1984 emphasizing how geometric phases provide a powerful unifying concept in several branches of classical and quantum physics.

The Aharonov–Casher effect is a quantum mechanical phenomenon predicted in 1984 by Yakir Aharonov and Aharon Casher, in which a traveling magnetic dipole is affected by an electric field. It is dual to the Aharonov–Bohm effect, in which the quantum phase of a charged particle depends upon which side of a magnetic flux tube it comes through. In the Aharonov–Casher effect, the particle has a magnetic moment and the tubes are charged instead. It was observed in a gravitational neutron interferometer in 1989 and later by fluxon interference of magnetic vortices in Josephson junctions. It has also been seen with electrons and atoms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Antisymmetric exchange</span> Contribution to magnetic exchange interaction

In Physics, antisymmetric exchange, also known as the Dzyaloshinskii–Moriya interaction (DMI), is a contribution to the total magnetic exchange interaction between two neighboring magnetic spins, and . Quantitatively, it is a term in the Hamiltonian which can be written as

The Peierls substitution method, named after the original work by Rudolf Peierls is a widely employed approximation for describing tightly-bound electrons in the presence of a slowly varying magnetic vector potential.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Orbital angular momentum of free electrons</span>

Electrons in free space can carry quantized orbital angular momentum (OAM) projected along the direction of propagation. This orbital angular momentum corresponds to helical wavefronts, or, equivalently, a phase proportional to the azimuthal angle. Electron beams with quantized orbital angular momentum are also called electron vortex beams.

In condensed matter physics and black hole physics, the Sachdev–Ye–Kitaev (SYK) model is an exactly solvable model initially proposed by Subir Sachdev and Jinwu Ye, and later modified by Alexei Kitaev to the present commonly used form. The model is believed to bring insights into the understanding of strongly correlated materials and it also has a close relation with the discrete model of AdS/CFT. Many condensed matter systems, such as quantum dot coupled to topological superconducting wires, graphene flake with irregular boundary, and kagome optical lattice with impurities, are proposed to be modeled by it. Some variants of the model are amenable to digital quantum simulation, with pioneering experiments implemented in a NMR setting.

The quantum Cramér–Rao bound is the quantum analogue of the classical Cramér–Rao bound. It bounds the achievable precision in parameter estimation with a quantum system:

The quantum Fisher information is a central quantity in quantum metrology and is the quantum analogue of the classical Fisher information. The quantum Fisher information of a state with respect to the observable is defined as

References

  1. Jackson, John D. (1998). Classical Electrodynamics (3rd ed.). Wiley. ISBN   7-04-014432-8.
  2. 1 2 Hirst, L. L. (1997), "The microscopic magnetization: concept and application", Reviews of Modern Physics, vol. 69, no. 2, pp. 607–628, Bibcode:1997RvMP...69..607H, doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.69.607
  3. 1 2 Resta, Raffaele (2010), "Electrical polarization and orbital magnetization: the modern theories", Journal of Physics: Condensed Matter, vol. 22, no. 12, p. 123201, Bibcode:2010JPCM...22l3201R, doi:10.1088/0953-8984/22/12/123201, PMID   21389484, S2CID   18645988
  4. Todorova, M.; Sandratskii, M.; Kubler, J. (January 2001), "Current-determined orbital magnetization in a metallic magnet", Physical Review B, American Physical Society, 63 (5): 052408, Bibcode:2001PhRvB..63e2408T, doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.63.052408
  5. Xiao, Di; Shi, Junren; Niu, Qian (September 2005), "Berry Phase Correction to Electron Density of States in Solids", Phys. Rev. Lett., 95 (13): 137204, arXiv: cond-mat/0502340 , Bibcode:2005PhRvL..95m7204X, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.137204, PMID   16197171, S2CID   119017032
  6. Thonhauser, T.; Ceresoli, D.; Vanderbilt, D.; Resta, R. (2005). "Orbital magnetization in periodic insulators". Phys. Rev. Lett. 95 (13): 137205. arXiv: cond-mat/0505518 . Bibcode:2005PhRvL..95m7205T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.137205. PMID   16197172. S2CID   11961765.
  7. Ceresoli, D.; Thonhauser, T.; Vanderbilt, D.; Resta, R. (2006). "Orbital magnetization in crystalline solids: Multi-band insulators, Chern insulators, and metals". Phys. Rev. B. 74 (2): 024408. arXiv: cond-mat/0512142 . Bibcode:2006PhRvB..74b4408C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.74.024408. S2CID   958110.
  8. 1 2 Shi, Junren; Vignale, G.; Niu, Qian (November 2007), "Quantum Theory of Orbital Magnetization and Its Generalization to Interacting Systems", Phys. Rev. Lett., American Physical Society, 99 (19): 197202, arXiv: 0704.3824 , Bibcode:2007PhRvL..99s7202S, doi:10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.197202, PMID   18233109, S2CID   7942622
  9. Ceresoli, D.; Gerstmann, U.; Seitsonen, A.P.; Mauri, F. (Feb 2010). "First-principles theory of orbital magnetization". Phys. Rev. B. 81 (6): 060409 of 4 pages. arXiv: 0904.1988 . Bibcode:2010PhRvB..81f0409C. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.81.060409. S2CID   118625623.
  10. Thonhauser, T. (May 2011). "Theory of Orbital Magnetization in Solids". Int. J. Mod. Phys. B. 25 (11): 1429–1458. arXiv: 1105.5251 . Bibcode:2011IJMPB..25.1429T. doi:10.1142/S0217979211058912. S2CID   119292686.
  11. Meyer, A.J.P.; Asch, G. (1961). "Experimental g' and g values for Fe, Co, Ni, and their alloys". J. Appl. Phys. 32 (3): S330. Bibcode:1961JAP....32S.330M. doi:10.1063/1.2000457.