Provinces of Scotland

Last updated

The Provinces of Scotland were the primary subdivisions of the early Kingdom of Alba, first recorded in the 10th century and probably developing from earlier Pictish territories. Provinces were led by a mormaer , the leader of the most powerful provincial kin-group, and had military, fiscal and judicial functions. Their high degree of local autonomy made them important regional powerbases for competing claimants to the throne of Alba.

Contents

Provinces declined in importance during the late 12th and early 13th centuries as expanding royal power saw feudal landholding rather than local kinship established as the dominant basis of secular authority. The power of mormaers became increasingly focused on their earldom, the territory that they controlled directly, rather than their leadership of the broader provincial community, and large provincial lordships were established that often rivalled earldoms in size and were granted to loyal supporters of the king. Local justice and administration became increasingly dominated by sheriffdoms, which were more directly under royal control.

Geography

Map of Scottish provinces in 1689. A new map of Scotland with the roads (8643653080).jpg
Map of Scottish provinces in 1689.

Before the early 13th century "Scotland" (Latin : Scotia, Old Irish : Alba) was considered to extend only between the Firth of Forth and the River Spey. [1] Within this area the provinces directly subject to the Kings of Alba by the 12th century were Fife, Strathearn, Atholl, Gowrie, Angus, the Mearns, Mar and Buchan. [2]

To the north of the Spey were territories also referred to as provinces, but whose status was more uncertain. [3] Moray may at times during the 11th century have operated as a separate kingdom or as a base for competing claimants for the throne of Alba, and control by the Kings of Alba remained variable until 1230. [4] Ross occupied an ambiguous and shifting status between the Gaelic-speakers to the south and the Norse inhabitants to the north until it was established as an Earldom in the reign of Malcolm III, [5] remaining an area of fluctuating royal control until 1215. [6] Caithness remained under the control of the Norse Earls of Orkney, who were subject to the King of Norway, until 1231. [7]

To the south of the Forth, in formerly Northumbrian or British areas controlled by the Kings of Alba but still administered as separate territories, the Earldoms of Dunbar, The Lennox and Carrick were also sometimes referred to as provinces, but were much later creations of the late 12th century and were always explicitly feudal landholdings. [8]

History

Origins and function

The names of provinces begin to appear in contemporary records of events in the Kingdom of Alba from about 900; before this date sources instead refer to earlier Pictish territories such as Fortriu, Circin and . [9] The degree of continuity between provinces and these earlier territories is uncertain. [10] Some names of earlier units such as Cait, Fife and Atholl survived as the names of later provinces, [10] and it is possible that some of the other provinces had existed before 900 as subdivisions of wider territories, but increased in prominence as the importance of these wider territories declined. [9]

By the late 10th century the Mormaer (Latin : Comes, Scots : Earl) was established as the leading figure in each province. [11] This transition is most clearly seen in the case of Atholl, which is recorded having a king in 739, but a mormaer in 965. [12] The mormaer of a province raised and led the army of the province in battle, oversaw the exercise of justice within the province, and was supported by tribute raised from defined areas within the province. [13] Although the mormaer was the ultimate head of a provincial community their power was only exercised in conjunction with other local potentates. [14] Provincial assemblies would include a wide range of men from a province with the mormaer as only one of a number of influential local figures. [15] The position of mormaer does not appear to have been hereditary before the late 12th century, instead being held by the most powerful head of kin within a province and sometimes alternating between different kin-groups. [16] Provinces could also function without mormaers: [17] King Edgar took the mormaership of Mearns directly into his own hands in 1097, [18] and the mormaership of Gowrie was in the hands of the crown by the reign of Alexander I, though as late as the reign of Malcolm IV charters were still distinguishing between manors within Gowrie held by the king in his capacity as king and those held by virtue of his control of the mormaerdom. [19]

Each province had at least one Brithem (Latin : Iudex, Scots : Dempster) a hereditary legal expert charged with upholding the laws, [20] appointed not by the king but locally from within the province. [21] A province's brithem made and transmitted new law in accordance with local custom; settled cases, particularly land disputes, [22] witnessed charters and witnessed and took part in the perambulation of boundaries. [23] Minor legal disputes were settled at local cuthill courts, [20] but major disputes were settled by summoning provincial assemblies that also included the provincial army. [24] Each province also had a specific location where stolen property and warrantors could be taken for hearings, and at least one toiseachdeor , whose job was to be the custodian of holy objects for the swearing of oaths. [24]

At this stage the provinces of Alba retained many "national" characteristics, with their own networks of clientage and kinship, their own assemblies and their own ecclesiastical hierarchies. [25] Although Kings of Alba maintained extensive royal territory within provinces, [26] control of provinces by kings was on the basis of reciprocal relationships and accommodations with local power-groups. [27] Provinces could form the basis for powerful regional hegemonies, often varying in their support for different royal lines. [28] This system of competing royal lineages with different provincial powerbases led to a pattern of violent royal succession, with twelve of the twenty kings ruling between 858 and 1093 being killed in internal violence by their own subjects. [29] In turn kings defeating mormaer-led provincial rebellions could respond by taking more provincial territory into their own direct control. [30] The crown held far more land than the mormaer within Angus, possibly as a result of conflict between the Mormaers of Angus and the kings Kenneth II and Malcolm II, and the Mearns was taken entirely into royal hands by King Edgar in response to the killing of his father Duncan II by the Mormaer of Mearns in 1094. [31]

Decline

De Situ Albanie , a document written between 1202 and 1214, envisaged Scotland north of the Forth being made up entirely of provinces, mentioning no other contemporary land units, but in reality this structure was already beginning to fragment by this date. [32] From the 1160s onwards aristocratic power and jurisdiction moved away from being seen as having a provincial and social basis, instead coming to be seen within a framework of individual territorial landholdings, [33] while centralised royal power over territory increased and came to be exercised through formal institutions of local government known as sheriffdoms. [34]

The 12th and early 13th centuries saw major changes to the role of the mormaer , increasingly called an earl as Scots replaced Gaelic as the dominant vernacular language. [35] During the late 12th century an explicit distinction began to made between the provincia or province, the broad territory and community from which an earl took their name, and the comitatus or earldom, the smaller landholdings within the province that the earl directly controlled and held from the king. [36] By the early 13th century the earl's power had become increasingly focused on this territorial earldom rather than on their leadership of the wider province, and the earldom became a position that was directly inherited in the male line, as landholding replaced kinship as the dominant basis for secular power. [37] Royal thanages, landholdings held by a thane directly of the king and independently of the provincial community, appear within provinces from the early 13th century, [38] and royal control within provinces was further strengthened by the alienation of royal land to a king's supporters, including large provincial lordships such as Garioch that rivalled earldoms in size. [39] By 1221 earls were forbidden from entering the land of any other lord and had lost control over raising the provincial army, with individual landowners having responsibility for raising the army from their own territories. [40]

The provincial brithem , who had been prominent in legal documents in the 12th century, appears in a much more subordinate position by the end of the 13th century, [41] eventually sinking to the point of virtual insignificance. [42] A law enacted under David I required every brithem in a province to attend when the king entered that province [43] and between the reigns of David I and William I kings sought to link brithem more closely to their authority. [43] By the end of the 12th century kings increasingly saw themselves rather than brithem as the main source of lawmaking. [44] Sheriffs are recorded in the former Northumbrian areas south of the Forth from the 1120s, spreading north of the Forth over the following century. [45] The role of the sheriff seems initially to have been limited to the collection of revenue from burghs and other royal lands, [46] but by the 1180s sheriffs had authority over defined geographical areas and were expected to hold regular courts, as well as having the right to attend the courts of all nobles, including earls, within their area. [47] By the mid 13th century a uniform system of sherriffdoms covered the country, [48] supervised by a Justiciar of Scotia, unlike the brithem explicitly an agent of the king. [49]

By the 1260s the sheriffdom was the cornerstone of Scottish government, collecting the revenue that funded central royal government and extending the reach of royal power into aristocratic jurisdictions, [50] while over the course of the 14th and 15th centuries the role of the earl became increasingly honorific, with many having even fewer direct associations with the provinces after which they were named. [51] The provinces did not become obsolete, however, retaining at least a symbolic unity and continuing to be referred to by writers over following centuries. [40]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Constantine II of Scotland</span> 10th-century king of Scotland (Alba)

Causantín mac Áeda was an early King of Scotland, known then by the Gaelic name Alba. The Kingdom of Alba, a name which first appears in Constantine's lifetime, was situated in modern-day Northern Scotland.

Macbethad mac Findláech, nicknamed the Red King, was King of Scotland (Alba) from 1040 until his death. Little is known about Macbeth's early life, although he was the son of Findláech of Moray and may have been a grandson of Malcolm II. He became Mormaer (Earl) of Moray – a semi-autonomous province – in 1032, and was probably responsible for the death of the previous mormaer, Gille Coemgáin. He subsequently married Gille Coemgáin's widow, Gruoch, but they had no children together.

<i>Orkneyinga saga</i> Scandinavian-Scottish literary work

The Orkneyinga saga is a narrative of the history of the Orkney and Shetland islands and their relationship with other local polities, particularly Norway and Scotland. The saga has "no parallel in the social and literary record of Scotland" and is "the only medieval chronicle to have Orkney as the central place of action". The main focus of the work is the line of jarls who ruled the Earldom of Orkney, which constituted the Norðreyjar or Northern Isles of Orkney and Shetland and there are frequent references to both archipelagoes throughout.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atholl</span> Historical division in the Scottish Highlands

Atholl or Athole is a large historical division in the Scottish Highlands, bordering Marr, Badenoch, Lochaber, Breadalbane, Strathearn, Perth, and Gowrie. Historically it was a Pictish kingdom, becoming one of the original provinces of the Kingdom of Alba before being incorporated into the sheriffdom and later county of Perthshire. Today it forms the northern part of Perth and Kinross, Scotland.

In early medieval Scotland, a mormaer was the Gaelic name for a regional or provincial ruler, theoretically second only to the King of Scots, and the senior of a Toísech (chieftain). Mormaers were equivalent to English earls or Continental counts, and the term is often translated into English as 'earl'.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earl of Moray</span> Scottish noble title

The title Earl of Moray, Mormaer of Moray or King of Moray was originally held by the rulers of the Province of Moray, which existed from the 10th century with varying degrees of independence from the Kingdom of Alba to the south. Until 1130 the status of Moray's rulers was ambiguous and they were described in some sources as "mormaers", in others as "Kings of Moray", and in others as "Kings of Alba". The position was suppressed by David I of Scotland some time after his defeat of Óengus of Moray at the Battle of Stracathro in 1130, but was recreated as a feudal earldom by Robert the Bruce and granted to Thomas Randolph, 1st Earl of Moray in 1312.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Earl of Orkney</span> Norwegian, then Scottish, noble title over the Northern Isles and northern Scotland

Earl of Orkney, historically Jarl of Orkney, is a title of nobility encompassing the archipelagoes of Orkney and Shetland, which comprise the Northern Isles of Scotland. Originally founded by Norse invaders, the status of the rulers of the Northern Isles as Norwegian vassals was formalised in 1195. Although the Old Norse term jarl is etymologically related to "earl", and the jarls were succeeded by earls in the late 15th century, a Norwegian jarl is not the same thing. In the Norse context the distinction between jarls and kings did not become significant until the late 11th century and the early jarls would therefore have had considerable independence of action until that time. The position of Jarl of Orkney was eventually the most senior rank in medieval Norway except for the king himself.

The Earl of Fife or Mormaer of Fife was the ruler of the province of Fife in medieval Scotland, which encompassed the modern counties of Fife and Kinross. Due to their royal ancestry, the earls of Fife were the highest ranking nobles in the realm, and had the right to crown the king of Scots.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Donnchadh, Earl of Carrick</span> Mormaer or Earl of Carrick

Donnchadh was a Gall-Gaidhil prince and Scottish magnate in what is now south-western Scotland, whose career stretched from the last quarter of the 12th century until his death in 1250. His father, Gille-Brighde of Galloway, and his uncle, Uhtred of Galloway, were the two rival sons of Fergus, Prince or Lord of Galloway. As a result of Gille-Brighde's conflict with Uhtred and the Scottish monarch William the Lion, Donnchadh became a hostage of King Henry II of England. He probably remained in England for almost a decade before returning north on the death of his father. Although denied succession to all the lands of Galloway, he was granted lordship over Carrick in the north.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fearchar, Earl of Ross</span>

Fearchar of Ross or Ferchar mac in tSagairt, was the first of the Scottish Ó Beólláin family who received by Royal Grant the lands and Title of Mormaer or Earl of Ross (1223–1251) we know of from the thirteenth century, whose career brought Ross into the fold of the Scottish kings for the first time, and who is remembered as the founder of the Earldom of Ross.

Moray was a province within the area of modern-day Scotland, that may at times up to the 12th century have operated as an independent kingdom or as a power base for competing claimants to the Kingdom of Alba. It covered a much larger territory than the modern council area of Moray, extending approximately from the River Spey in the east to the River Beauly in the north, and encompassing Badenoch, Lochaber and Glenelg in the south and west.

The House of Moray or Clann Ruaidrí is a historiographical and genealogical construct to illustrate the succession of rulers whose base was in Moray and who ruled sometimes a larger kingdom. An important feature of Scottish politics throughout the 11th century, they reached the height of their power with the reign of Macbeth between 1040 and 1057.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kingdom of Alba</span> Medieval kingdom in Scotland

The Kingdom of Alba was the Kingdom of Scotland between the deaths of Donald II in 900 and of Alexander III in 1286. The latter's death led indirectly to an invasion of Scotland by Edward I of England in 1296 and the First War of Scottish Independence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Scotland in the High Middle Ages</span> Scotland between about 900 and 1286 CE

The High Middle Ages of Scotland encompass Scotland in the era between the death of Domnall II in 900 AD and the death of King Alexander III in 1286, which was an indirect cause of the Wars of Scottish Independence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Formartine</span> Committee area in Aberdeenshire, Scotland

Formartine is a committee area in Aberdeenshire, Scotland. This district extends north from the River Don to the River Ythan. It has a population of 36,478.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mormaer of Caithness</span>

The Mormaer of Caithness was a vassal title mostly held by members of the Norwegian nobility based in Orkney from the Viking Age until 1350. The mormaerdom was held as fief of Scotland and the title was frequently held by the Norse Earls of Orkney, who were thus a vassal of both the King of Norway and the King of Scots. There is no other example in the history of either Norway or of Scotland in which a dynasty of earls owed their allegiance to two different kings.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gowrie</span> Region in central Scotland

Gowrie is a region in central Scotland and one of the original provinces of the Kingdom of Alba. It covered the eastern part of what became Perthshire. It was located to the immediate east of Atholl, and originally included the area around Perth, though that was later detached as Perthia.

Thane was the title given to a local royal official in medieval eastern Scotland, equivalent in rank to the son of an earl, who was at the head of an administrative and socio-economic unit known as a thanedom or thanage.

Provincial lordships is a modern term used by historians to describe large feudal landholdings created in Scotland during the 12th and 13th centuries. These landholdings were granted by kings to their supporters to secure royal control of territories outside the core of the Kingdom of Alba, which during this period was considered to extend only between the River Forth and the River Spey to the east of the Highlands, but which controlled territory well beyond this.

A Brithem was a hereditary legal expert in medieval Scotland, charged with upholding the laws within one of the provinces of Scotland. The role is thought to long predate its first documentary record in the 12th century. At least one brithem was attached to each province, and the role was not a royal appointment, but one that took place within the province. There is no record of any brithem in Lothian, though they are recorded in Galloway.

References

  1. Broun 2007, p. 7.
  2. Taylor 2016, p. 37.
  3. Woolf 2007, p. 166.
  4. Broun 2007, pp. 8–9.
  5. Grant 2012, pp. 99–104.
  6. Grant 2012, pp. 106–107.
  7. Broun 2007, p. 9.
  8. Taylor 2016, pp. 36–37.
  9. 1 2 Evans 2019, p. 32.
  10. 1 2 Evans 2019, p. 31.
  11. Woolf 2007, p. 342.
  12. Grant 2000, p. 65.
  13. Taylor 2016, p. 39.
  14. Taylor 2016, p. 40.
  15. Taylor 2016, pp. 40–41.
  16. Taylor 2016, pp. 43, 45.
  17. Broun 2015, p. 54.
  18. Broun 2015, p. 29.
  19. Grant 2000, pp. 57–58.
  20. 1 2 Grant 2000, p. 54.
  21. Broun 2015, p. 8.
  22. Taylor 2016, p. 121.
  23. Barrow 1966, pp. 18–19.
  24. 1 2 Grant 2000, p. 55.
  25. Woolf 2007, p. 197.
  26. Grant 2000, pp. 61–62.
  27. Taylor 2016, p. 82.
  28. Woolf 2007, p. 196.
  29. Grant 2000, p. 66.
  30. Grant 2000, p. 67.
  31. Grant 2000, p. 68.
  32. Grant 2000, pp. 56–57.
  33. Taylor 2016, p. 176.
  34. Taylor 2016, pp. 12–13.
  35. Taylor 2016, p. 36.
  36. Taylor 2016, pp. 46–47.
  37. Broun 2015, p. 25.
  38. Taylor 2016, p. 66.
  39. Taylor 2016, p. 439.
  40. 1 2 Taylor 2016, p. 52.
  41. Barrow 1966, p. 18.
  42. Barrow 1966, p. 16.
  43. 1 2 Taylor 2016, p. 130.
  44. Taylor 2016, pp. 131–132.
  45. Taylor 2016, p. 194.
  46. Taylor 2016, p. 210.
  47. Taylor 2016, pp. 205–206.
  48. Taylor 2016, p. 263.
  49. Taylor 2016, p. 232.
  50. Taylor 2016, p. 398.
  51. Taylor 2016, p. 34.

Bibliography