Renewable energy in California

Last updated

California produces more renewable energy than any other state in the United States except Texas. [1] In 2018, California ranked first in the nation as a producer of electricity from solar, geothermal, and biomass resources and fourth in the nation in conventional hydroelectric power generation. [2] As of 2017, over half of the electricity (52.7%) produced was from renewable sources. [3]

Contents

In 2006, the California legislature passed the Global Warming Solutions Act of 2006 which set a goal for 33% of electricity consumption in California to be generated by renewable sources by 2020. [4]

In 2015, SB350 mandated that electric utilities purchase 50% of their electricity from renewable sources by 2030. [5]

Then in 2018, Senate Bill 100 was passed which increased the renewables requirement for electric utilities to 50% by 2026, 60% by 2030, and 100% by 2045. [6]

In March 2022, CPUC approved a plan to add 18.8 GW solar, 6.7 GW wind, and 14.7 GW batteries by 2032 at 18c/kWh, reaching 73% renewables. [7]

Significance at national level

Renewable energy map usa.jpg

California's total energy consumption is second-highest in the nation but the state's per capita energy consumption is the fourth-lowest, due in part to its mild climate and its energy efficiency programs. [2] The percentage of renewable energy in California is perhaps made more notable by the particularly high population of the state, states with similar or higher percentages of renewable energy generally have lower populations. In 2009, the energy production in California was 8.43% of the nation's total renewable energy production, the second highest in the country after Washington. [8] [9] By 2017, California was the highest, with 10.05% of national renewable production. [1]

Hydroelectric power generation

Hydroelectric power is power created from the energy of running water. This water is usually stored and controlled by dams. [10] [11] Its productivity changes in accordance to how much rainfall is produced annually. [12] In 2018, California ranked second in the United States for conventional hydroelectric generation, [2] however this is highly variable depending on droughts. For instance it obtained 21% of its electricity through hydroelectric power sources in 2017. This was higher than the previous year when only 14% of its electricity was produced through hydroelectric power. A drought in 2012 led to a reduction in the generation of hydroelectric power. Because of this, in 2014 the Energy Commission of California began to track the conditions on how the drought started. Utilities responded to the decrease in precipitation and lack of hydroelectric power by making short-term market purchases and relying on other renewable sources of electricity. Recovery from the drought started in late 2016, partly due to increased precipitation that restored hydroelectric power to normal conditions. [13]

History of hydroelectric power generation in California

San Bernardino, California became the first western region state to receive a hydroelectric plant in 1887. [14] San Bernardino also received a voltage increase of 10,000 in 1892, from a 42-mile line extension that originated from a single phase 120 kilowatt (kW) plant built in San Antonio Creek, California. While this is occurring in California, in the same year, Edison General Electric and Thomas Houston combine to form General Electric. An ore mill owned by Standard Consolidated Mining, began receiving electricity from a 12.5-mile 2,500 AC power line that originated in Bodie, California. [15]

With the first three-phase hydroelectric system being built in Germany back in 1891, the U.S. gets its first three phase system in 1893 in Mill Creek, California: featuring a line connection that extended 8 miles and carried 2,400 volts of electricity. Folsom, California received the same type of system in 1893 as well, except it had 11,000 volt alternators put in place, and its power line extended all the way to the state capitol, Sacramento. [15]

The acquisition of Colgate hydroelectric plants in 1899 by Sacramento Power & Light Corporation gives them ownership of a 62-mile long power line extension. [15]

In 1901, Bay Counties Power Company builds a 142-mile long power line from the Colgate hydroelectric plant, to Oakland, California. [15]

In the 1902 Reclamation act, the authority to install and input hydroelectric facilities was given to what would later become the Bureau of Reclamation. [15]

In 1920, the Federal Power Commission is created through the Federal Power Act with the authority to give licenses for companies to build hydroelectric facilities. Two years later in 1922, the first hydroelectric plant is built to meet peaking power capacity. [15]

In 1944, Shasta Dam begins producing electricity for the first time in California. [15]

The late 1960s and the 1970s ushered in an era of protection policies from the federal government. The first was the 1968 Wild and Scenic Rivers Act, which stopped any attempt to build hydroelectric facilities on or near rivers. The National Environment Policy Act followed the year after in 1969; and it enforced the idea of protecting the environment amongst the many federal agencies. Then came the Fish and Wildlife Coordination Act in 1974, protecting species of fish and wildlife from the activities of the federal government. Four years later, the year 1978 brought about the Public Utility Regulatory Policies act, which allowed utility companies to go without federal licensing for hydroelectric projects. [15]

By 2008, the United States gets 6 percent of its electric power from hydroelectric production. [15]

Solar power generation

Solar power is power generated via the collection of the sunlight exerted from the sun. [16] [17] In 2018, California ranked first in the United States for solar power generation. [2] Over the past eight years, the prices of solar panels and solar power have fallen considerably. In 2010, only about 0.5% of California's electricity came from solar power, although this percentage rose to about 10% in 2016. According to the U.S. Energy Information Administration, solar electricity costs about 5 to 6 cents per kilowatt-hour, in part due to California's emphasis on solar power. This price is on par with the cost to produce electricity through a natural gas plant and is half of the cost of a nuclear power facility. [18] On December 5, 2018, the California Building Standards Commission voted unanimously to add energy standards to the state building code, officially making California the first state in the United States to require that new homes, built in 2020 and later, be solar powered. [19]

In recent years, California's electricity generation from solar power has increased substantially. There have been issues with solar power plants producing too much electricity for the transmission grid to handle and the state to use. In March 2017, California produced so much extra solar power it paid Arizona to take the electricity, saving Arizona substantial amounts of money on electricity. [18]

History of Solar Power Generation in California

Electricity generated from sunlight via silicon solar cells was the invention produced by Bell Laboratories D.M. Chapin, C.S. Fuller and G.L. Pearson in 1954. In 1978, the U.S. Congress passed The Energy Tax Act. This was to counter the Arab Oil Embargo which generated an energy crisis in the U.S. during the 1970s. A 40% tax credit was given to homes that installed solar devices on their homes on or after April 20, 1977, and before January 1, 1986. Even though this policy was rolled back by the Reagan administration, this led to the rise in utility-scale solar systems and turbines in California. [20]

The world's largest photovoltaic cell manufacturing facility was built in Camarillo, California by ARCO in 1979. Within a four-year period, ARCO built a facility in the Californian Carrissa Plain, capable of generating 6 megawatts of photovoltaic cells. Later expanded to two megawatts, a 1.0 megawatt photovoltaic power plant was built in the Sacramento Municipality Utility District in 1984. Two years later in 1986, featured in California's Mojave Desert was the largest solar thermal electricity facility. Currently, this same facility generates 300 megawatts of solar thermal energy. [20]

Pacific Gas and Electric Company (PG&E) built a 500-kilowatt grid-supporting photovoltaic system in Kerman, California. Being 1993, it was the first of its kind "distributed power" PV installment. In 1996, solar two illustrated how the storing of energy with efficiency could allow power and electricity to be generated even at night. This is why the U.S. Department of Energy and an industry consortium upgraded from solar-one, to solar-two. [20]

Also in 1996, the state legislature and Governor Pete Wilson put in place Assembly Bill 1890: which boosted incentives to produce more grid-based PV systems under the direction of the California Energy Commission's Renewable Energy Program, while at the same time weakening state investor-owned electric utilities. Senate Bill 90, which supported the provisions of Assembly Bill 1890, focused the resources of the Energy Commission to renewable energy. Uplifting a self-sustaining market for "emerging" renewable energy technologies was the objective in Senate Bill 90. [20]

Technology used for Solar Power Generation

The technology behind solar power generation varies, depending on the method being used to generate power. Photovoltaic (PV), concentrating solar power (CSP), and solar heating and cooling (SHC) systems are the three different solar technologies used to generate power. [21] [22]

Photovoltaic cells convert sunlight into power directly. Observed on solar panels, photovoltaic is the more familiar method of technology in regards to solar power. They can be seen on the roofs of homes, in a field next to schools, behind stores, etc. Concentrating solar power (CSP) features massive areas of solar mirrors that indirectly generate power. They are more so used in large scale facilities and campuses like power plants. [21] Solar heating and cooling technology takes heat from the sun and provides for things like water heating, space heating, and more. [22]

How the process works

Solar energy is produced in three different ways as mentioned above: via photovoltaic cells (PV), concentrating solar power (CSP), and solar heating and cooling (SHC). [22]

In the case of photovoltaic cells, electricity is generated via the absorption of sunlight. The sunlight is converted into electricity by a semi-conductor. The photons, after phasing through the semi-conductor, loses their electrons. [23]

Concentrating solar power (CSP) features turbines powered by huge areas of solar mirrors that in turn derive energy from the sun. [24]

Solar heating and cooling (SHC) systems can be installed into homes just like other basic installations. Solar water heating provides that a solar collector store heated water, which is warmed by thermal energy from the sun, in a storage tank. Hot or cold, this water can then be used for any residential purposes. [25]

Geothermal power generation

Geothermal power is power generated via the collection of thermal energy, stored over millions of years in the Earth's core. [26] [27] In 2017, California ranked first in the United States in geothermal power generation. [2] California is located on the Pacific Ring of Fire, with the conjunctions of tectonic plates providing California the largest potential for producing geothermal energy generation in the country. Most of California's geothermal plants are located slightly north of San Francisco in Lake Folsom and Sonoma Counties. This is due to the geysers geothermal resource area, which produces electricity from dry steam. This area has been producing electricity since the mid-1960s, with dry steam in this location existing in only one of two places in the world. [28]

There are 43 operating geothermal power plants in California, which produced 11,745 gigawatt-hours of electricity in 2017. This in-state generation, combined with 700 GWh of imported geothermal energy, led geothermal energy to contribute 5.69% of the state's total electricity usage in 2017. [28]

History of geothermal power generation in California

In 1847, north of San Francisco, California, a streaming valley containing an area called "The Geysers." The area was discovered by William Bell Elliot. A member of John C. Fremonts's survey party, he believed he had found the gates of hell. [29] [30]

In 1927, Imperial Valley, California featured the first exploratory wells. They were drilled by the Pioneer Development Company. [29] [30] Thirty-three years later in 1927, the Pacific Gas and Electric Company began the operating the nation's first large-scale geothermal electricity-generating plant. Encompassing an 11 megawatts (MW) productivity of net power, it lasted for three decades.

Seal of the United States Department of Energy Seal of the United States Department of Energy.svg
Seal of the United States Department of Energy


1970 brought about both the Geothermal Resources Council and The Geothermal Stream Act. The Geothermal Resources Council was to inspire the development of geothermal resources around the world. The Geothermal Stream Act, established in the U.S. that the Secretary of the Interior have the power to lease federal publicly owned lands to geothermal explorations. The rest of the 1970s saw a rise in geothermal organizations. One of those was The U.S. Department of Energy (DOE), which was established in 1977. [29] [30] The Imperial Valley in California gets the first electrical development of a water-dominated geothermal resource in 1979. [30]

Producing 10 megawatts (MW), 1980 brings about the first geothermal flash plant, producing 10 megawatts (MW) in Brawley, California. It's developed by the Union Oil Company of California (UNOCAL). [29] [30] In 2005, the Energy Policy act evolved America's policy by giving tax incentives for energy production. This made for a more competitive environment for geothermal energy with fossil fuels. [29] [30]

Biomass power generation

Biomass power is power generated by extracting the energy stored in plants and animals. [31] [32] Biomass is all solid, nonhazardous, cellulosic material taken from forested areas. California ranked first in the United States in power generation from biomass in 2017. [2] Biomass-based electricity in California produced 5,767 gigawatt-hours of electricity in 2017, contributing to about 2.8 percent of the state's total energy usage. There are 93 operating biomass-based power plants in California. [33]

California's biomass power mostly comes from waste-to-energy based power plants. There are four specific types of biomass power generation in California: biomass, digester gas (anaerobic digestion), landfill gas, and municipal solid waste. In addition to these four categories, there is one biomass electricity plant in the state that uses chipped-up forest residue as fuel for electricity generation. [33]

Wind power generation

California ranked fourth in the United States in wind power generation in 2017, behind Texas, Oklahoma, and Iowa. [34] Wind power in California generated about 13,500 gigawatt-hours of electricity in 2016; this amounts to about 6.81 percent of the state's electricity usage. This number does not account for homes and farms that use personal turbines to produce power. [35]

History of wind power generation in California

Just like with solar energy, tax incentives from the Energy Tax Act (ETA) of 1978 led to a rise in wind based electrical systems in the state of California. [20]

In 1978, wind developers began large wind projects in both Altamont Pass and Tehachapi, California. Three years later in 1981, utilities were required to establish long-term possessions of alternative energy because of a boom in wind energy production, which was caused by the movements and changes made by the California Public Utility Commission. However, by 1985 the need for wind power retracted a little due to a drop in oil prices. So, California utility companies stop contracting deals that involved wind power because the incentive decayed a little. [36] Still, that did not stop the production of wind power in California. In fact, in that same year (1985), productivity was still active enough for a preference on the type of turbine installed by companies. The 56-100 kW machine became the most preferred wind turbine in the United States. Most if not all of those turbines resided in California by 1986, with Altamont Pass encompassing 6,200 turbines, and California wind farms having a 1,200 megawatt (MW) total capacity. [36]

The 2005 Energy Policy Act, like it did the other types of renewable energy sources, effected the capacity to which the U.S. could produce electricity via the wind, by increasing it. By 2015, California is leading the way when it comes to renewable energy, and begins establishing more opportunities to expand the use of wind energy with a 50 percent renewable portfolio standards (RPS). [36]

Renewable energy industry employment

A 2019 report from two non-profit environmental groups stated that "clean energy jobs" in California outnumbered fossil fuel jobs 5 to 1, but Jim Sweeney, a professor at Stanford's Precourt Energy Efficiency Center stated that two-thirds of the jobs labelled as "clean energy jobs" are jobs in energy efficiency, and are not new jobs, but rather a re-labelling of old jobs such as furnace installer (with more efficient furnaces.) [37] He stated that a more fair comparison would show the same number of clean energy jobs as fossil fuel jobs. [37]

In California, the clean energy economy provides 16% of clean energy jobs within the United States, which includes the 26.5% employment rates for renewable energy occupations. [38] California had employed the most people during the COVID-19 pandemic (2019-2020), with a total of 485,000 new employees that is 3% of California's work force. [39] Employees' hired in California for renewable energy occupations include 124,817 jobs in solar energy and 2,520 jobs in wind energy. [40] Jobs provided to Californians' related to energy efficiency are categorized by manufacturing of clean vehicles (40,000 jobs), Clean storage (17,000 jobs), electricity grid modification (6,000 jobs), and all other indirect clean energy sectors (500,000 jobs). [40]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electricity generation</span> Process of generating electrical power

Electricity generation is the process of generating electric power from sources of primary energy. For utilities in the electric power industry, it is the stage prior to its delivery to end users or its storage.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy</span> Energy collected from renewable resources

Renewable energy is energy from renewable resources that are naturally replenished on a human timescale. Renewable resources include sunlight, wind, the movement of water, and geothermal heat. Although most renewable energy sources are sustainable, some are not. For example, some biomass sources are considered unsustainable at current rates of exploitation. Renewable energy is often used for electricity generation, heating and cooling. Renewable energy projects are typically large-scale, but they are also suited to rural and remote areas and developing countries, where energy is often crucial in human development. Renewable energy is often deployed together with further electrification, which has several benefits: electricity can move heat or objects efficiently, and is clean at the point of consumption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Power station</span> Facility generating electric power

A power station, also referred to as a power plant and sometimes generating station or generating plant, is an industrial facility for the generation of electric power. Power stations are generally connected to an electrical grid.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of electricity generation</span>

Electric power systems consist of generation plants of different energy sources, transmission networks, and distribution lines. Each of these components can have environmental impacts at multiple stages of their development and use including in their construction, during the generation of electricity, and in their decommissioning and disposal. These impacts can be split into operational impacts and construction impacts. All forms of electricity generation have some form of environmental impact, but coal-fired power is the dirtiest. This page is organized by energy source and includes impacts such as water usage, emissions, local pollution, and wildlife displacement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peaking power plant</span> Reserved for high demand times

Peaking power plants, also known as peaker plants, and occasionally just "peakers", are power plants that generally run only when there is a high demand, known as peak demand, for electricity. Because they supply power only occasionally, the power supplied commands a much higher price per kilowatt hour than base load power. Peak load power plants are dispatched in combination with base load power plants, which supply a dependable and consistent amount of electricity, to meet the minimum demand.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Capacity factor</span> Electrical production measure

The net capacity factor is the unitless ratio of actual electrical energy output over a given period of time to the theoretical maximum electrical energy output over that period. The theoretical maximum energy output of a given installation is defined as that due to its continuous operation at full nameplate capacity over the relevant period. The capacity factor can be calculated for any electricity producing installation, such as a fuel consuming power plant or one using renewable energy, such as wind or the sun. The average capacity factor can also be defined for any class of such installations, and can be used to compare different types of electricity production.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in the United States</span>

According to data from the US Energy Information Administration, renewable energy accounted for about 13.1% of total primary energy consumption and about 21.5% of total utility-scale electricity generation in the United States in 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Solar power in the United States</span>

Solar power includes solar farms as well as local distributed generation, mostly on rooftops and increasingly from community solar arrays. In 2022, utility-scale solar power generated 145.6 terawatt-hours (TWh), or 3.4% of electricity in the United States. Total solar generation that year, including estimated small-scale photovoltaic generation, was 204 TWh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in Canada</span> Use of renewable resources in Canada

As of 2019, renewable energy technologies provide about 17.3% of Canada's total primary energy supply. For electricity renewables provide 67%, with 15% from nuclear and 18% from hydrocarbons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Energy in California</span> Overview of the use of energy in California, U.S.

Energy in California is a major area of the economy of California. California is the state with the largest population and the largest economy in the United States. It is second in energy consumption after Texas. As of 2018, per capita consumption was the fourth-lowest in the United States partially because of the mild climate and energy efficiency programs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in Hungary</span>

Hungary is a member of the European Union and thus takes part in the EU strategy to increase its share of renewable energy. The EU has adopted the 2009 Renewable Energy Directive, which included a 20% renewable energy target by 2020 for the EU. By 2030 wind should produce in average 26-35% of the EU's electricity and save Europe €56 billion a year in avoided fuel costs. The national authors of Hungary forecast is 14.7% renewables in gross energy consumption by 2020, exceeding their 13% binding target by 1.7 percentage points. Hungary is the EU country with the smallest forecast penetration of renewables of the electricity demand in 2020, namely only 11%.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Renewable energy in South Africa</span>

Renewable energy in South Africa is energy generated in South Africa from renewable resources, those that naturally replenish themselves—such as sunlight, wind, tides, waves, rain, biomass, and geothermal heat. Renewable energy focuses on four core areas: electricity generation, air and water heating/cooling, transportation, and rural energy services. The energy sector in South Africa is an important component of global energy regimes due to the country's innovation and advances in renewable energy. South Africa's greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions is ranked as moderate and its per capita emission rate is higher than the global average. Energy demand within the country is expected to rise steadily and double by 2025.

References

  1. 1 2 "Production". eia.gov. Retrieved February 23, 2020.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "eia.gov California state overview" . Retrieved February 23, 2020.
  3. ↑ "Overview". eia.gov. Retrieved February 23, 2020.
  4. ↑ "CALIFORNIA'S CLIMATE PLAN". California Air Resources Board . Archived from the original on March 27, 2016. Electricity and Energy (imported included): Improved appliance efficiency standards and other aggressive energy efficiency measures; 33% renewables by 2020;
  5. ↑ Megerian, Chris; Panzar, Javier (October 7, 2015). "Gov. Brown signs climate change bill to spur renewable energy, efficiency standards". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved August 27, 2020. Under the legislation, which builds upon standards already on the books, California will need to generate half of its electricity from renewable sources such as solar and wind by 2030. ... Even though the goal of reducing gasoline use was not included in the final legislation, SB 350, Brown plans to use his executive power to keep working on the issue.
  6. ↑ Dillon, Laim (September 10, 2018). "California to rely on 100% clean electricity by 2045 under bill signed by Gov. Jerry Brown". Los Angeles Times . Retrieved August 27, 2020. Senate Bill 100 by state Sen. Kevin de León (D-Los Angeles) requires the state to obtain all of its electricity from clean sources – such as solar, wind and hydropower – by 2045. The bill also requires electric utilities and other service providers to generate 60% of their power from renewable sources by 2030, up from the 50% goal previously set for that date.
  7. ↑ Rai-Roche, Sean (February 14, 2022). "CPUC approves plans to add 18.8GW of solar, 15GW of battery storage by 2032". PV Tech. Archived from the original on March 24, 2022.
  8. ↑ "Energy.gov".
  9. ↑ "eia.gov".
  10. ↑ "Hydropower - Energy Explained, Your Guide To Understanding Energy - Energy Information Administration". eia.gov. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  11. ↑ "Hydro Power | Student Energy". studentenergy.org. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  12. ↑ "Hydroelectric Power in California". energy.ca.gov. Retrieved April 14, 2019.
  13. ↑ Commission, California Energy. "Hydroelectric Power in California". energy.ca.gov. Retrieved November 13, 2018.
  14. ↑ "History". National Hydropower Association. Retrieved April 14, 2019.
  15. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 "Hydropower Program | Bureau of Reclamation". usbr.gov. Retrieved April 28, 2019.
  16. ↑ "About Solar Energy". SEIA. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  17. ↑ "Solar - Energy Explained, Your Guide To Understanding Energy - Energy Information Administration". eia.gov. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  18. 1 2 Penn, Ivan. "California invested heavily in solar power. Now there's so much that other states are sometimes paid to take it". Los Angeles Times. Retrieved November 13, 2018.
  19. ↑ "California officially becomes first in nation mandating solar power for new homes". Orange County Register. December 5, 2018. Retrieved December 15, 2018.
  20. 1 2 3 4 5 "History of Solar Energy in California - Go Solar California". gosolarcalifornia.ca.gov. Retrieved April 17, 2019.
  21. 1 2 "Solar Energy Technology Basics". Energy.gov. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  22. 1 2 3 "Solar Technologies". SEIA. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  23. ↑ "Photovoltaics". SEIA. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  24. ↑ "Concentrating Solar Power". SEIA. Retrieved April 24, 2019.
  25. ↑ "Solar Heating & Cooling". SEIA. Retrieved May 6, 2019.
  26. ↑ "Geothermal Basics - Basics". geo-energy.org. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  27. ↑ "Geothermal - Energy Explained, Your Guide To Understanding Energy - Energy Information Administration". eia.gov. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  28. 1 2 Commission, California Energy. "California Geothermal Energy Statistics & Data". energy.ca.gov. Retrieved November 13, 2018.
  29. 1 2 3 4 5 "History | Geothermal Electricity". sites.lafayette.edu. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  30. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "A History of Geothermal Energy in America". Energy.gov. Retrieved April 25, 2019.
  31. ↑ "Biomass Energy, definition of biomass energy and the types of biomass energy, pros and cons". altenergy.org. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  32. ↑ "Biomass - Energy Explained, Your Guide To Understanding Energy - Energy Information Administration". eia.gov. Retrieved March 27, 2019.
  33. 1 2 Commission, California Energy. "California Biomass and Waste-To-Energy Statistics & Data". energy.ca.gov. Retrieved November 13, 2018.
  34. ↑ "Best & Worst Ranked States for Wind Power | Choose Energy®". Choose Energy. Retrieved November 16, 2018.
  35. ↑ Commission, California Energy. "Wind Energy in California". energy.ca.gov. Retrieved November 16, 2018.
  36. 1 2 3 "History of Wind: 1980's - Turbine Timeline | AWEA". awea.org. Retrieved April 27, 2019.
  37. 1 2 "New report: California has five times more clean energy jobs than fossil fuel jobs". San Jose Mercury News . August 20, 2019. Retrieved May 28, 2022. Jim Sweeney, a professor of management and engineering at Stanford University and former director of Stanford's Precourt Energy Efficiency Center, said the numbers are accurate and the organizations that released it are credible. But, he said, nearly two-thirds of the jobs described as clean jobs are in energy efficiency, he noted. Many of those jobs, like installing heating and air conditioning systems, are not new jobs, but rather jobs that are changing as technology changes. "It's not like there are any jobs created because people are installing furnaces, just because some percentage of them are energy efficient", Sweeney said. "It's relabeling existing jobs". Sweeney said a more "apples to apples" comparison to the fossil fuel industry would be comparing jobs generating and installing renewable energy to jobs producing fossil fuels and operating power plants that run on them. That "supply side" comparison, he estimated, would show about the same number of clean energy jobs as fossil fuel jobs in California.
  38. ↑ CLEAN JOBS CALIFORNIA 2021 RESILIENT: AMERICA’S CLEAN ECONOMY POWERHOUSE IN THE WAKE OF COVID-19. United States: E2. 2021. pp. 1–20.
  39. ↑ Hubbard, Kaia (April 30, 2021). "These States Have the Most Clean Energy Jobs". U.S. News & World Report . Retrieved May 28, 2022.
  40. 1 2 "Clean Jobs California 2020 | America's Clean Energy Powerhouse in the Wake of COVID-19". E2. Retrieved May 28, 2022.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.