Rosemont Copper

Last updated

Rosemont Copper Mine
Location
USA Arizona location map.svg
Schlaegel und Eisen nach DIN 21800.svg
Rosemont Copper
Arizona
Country United States
Coordinates 31°51′05″N110°45′26″W / 31.85139°N 110.75722°W / 31.85139; -110.75722
Production
Products Copper
History
Openednot yet operational
Owner
Company Hudbay Minerals

Rosemont Copper is a proposed large open pit copper mine project by the Canadian mining corporation Hudbay Minerals. The project site is located within the Santa Rita Mountains and Coronado National Forest, in Pima County of southern Arizona. It has undergone a permitting review process under the direction of the United States Forest Service and the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers and has been delayed by legal judgements and suspension of its operating permit by the US Army Corps of Engineers. [1]

Contents

The Rosemont Copper Mine site is approximately 30 miles (48 km) southeast of Tucson. The nearest established communities are Sonoita, Patagonia, Sahuarita, Green Valley, Corona de Tucson, and Vail.

Opponents argue that the mine will pollute surface and subsurface water and damage aquifer quality and quantity, destroy natural habitats and endangering populations of vulnerable and unique wildlife, cause regional air pollution, and harm the local tourism industry. [2]

Proponents argue that the project will create jobs, generate tax revenue and reduce American dependence on foreign sources of copper. [3]

Following legal review of Rosemont's permits, on July 31, 2019, U.S. District Judge James Soto overturned the U.S. Forest Service's 2017 decision approving the mine and its 2013 final environmental impact statement clearing the way for that approval. On August 23, 2019, the US Army Corps of Engineers issued a letter to Rosemont Copper Company that immediately suspended its permit. In May 2022, the Ninth Circuit upheld [4] District Court Judge Soto’s order blocking the proposed mine on grounds of the 1872 Mining Law. The Ninth Circuit’s decision was not appealed [5] to the Supreme Court.  The ruling affects other potential mines in the Ninth Circuit that may seek to dispose of waste on public lands under color of the 1872 Mining Law. [6]

Context

The Rosemont Copper property is located in Pima County, approximately 30 miles (48 km) southeast of Tucson. It straddles two historic mining districts: the Rosemont Mining District and the adjacent Helvetia Mining District. [7] [8]

Copper became the focus of mining in the Santa Cruz Valley and elsewhere in Southern Arizona beginning in the late 1880s. [9] By 1907, Southern Arizona led world copper production. [10] Sporadic prospecting reportedly began in the northwestern portion of the Rosemont property, in the Helvetia Mining District, in the mid-1800s. Production from mines on both sides of the northern Santa Rita Mountains brought forth construction and operation of the Columbia Smelter at Helvetia on the west side of the Santa Rita Mountains and the Rosemont Smelter in the Rosemont Mining District on the east side of the Santa Rita Mountains. [7]

Copper production ceased in 1951. In the decades since, the area continued to be the site of successive exploration efforts. In 1956, the American Exploration and Mining Company began exploring the Broadtop Butte prospect. Banner Mining Company acquired most of the claims in the area by the late 1950s. Anaconda Mining Company acquired the claims to the property in 1963 and undertook a major exploration campaign that identified the Rosemont deposit as a major porphyry copper ore body. The company also advanced the Broadtop Butte and Peach-Elgin prospects. The project continued after Amax and Anaconda formed the Anamax partnership and ceased in 1986 when Anamax sold the property to a real estate company during the dissolution of Anaconda. ASARCO purchased the property in 1988, renewed exploration of the Peach-Elgin prospect and initiated engineering studies. ASARCO sold the entire property to real estate interests in 2004. Augusta acquired the Rosemont Property in 2005. [7] Hudbay Minerals acquired the property in 2014. [11]

Mineral rights

The core of the Rosemont property consists of 132 patented lode claims that encompass an area of 1,968 acres (796 ha). [12] A patented mining claim is one for which the federal government has passed its title to the claimant, making it private land. [13] A contiguous package of 850 unpatented lode mining claims with an aggregate area of approximately 12,000 acres (4,900 ha) surrounds the core of patented claims. An unpatented mine claim is one in which land is essentially leased from the government for the purpose of extracting minerals. [14] Most of the unpatented claims are on federal land administered by the United States Forest Service. In addition, a limited number of claims in the northwest portion of the Property are on federal land administered by the Bureau of Land Management. [12]

Resources

Rosemont has proven and probable reserves of 5.9 billion lbs of copper and 194 million lbs of molybdenum and inferred sulfide mineral resources of 1.1 billion lbs of copper and 35 million lbs of molybdenum. [15]

Geology

The regional, local and property geology of the Rosemont deposit consists of Precambrian sedimentary and intrusive rocks, which form the regional basement under a Palaeozoic sequence of quartzites, siltstones, and carbonate rocks. Sedimentary deposition ceased for a time during uplift and formation of a widespread unconformity in the early Mesozoic, and then resumed with the deposition of continental and shallow marine deposits. [16]

Subsequent granitic intrusions and felsic volcanic eruptions dominated the late Mesozoic and early Cenozoic, corresponding to the Laramide Orogeny when most of the porphyry copper deposits of the region formed. Compressional tectonics during the Laramide Orogeny created both low-angle thrust faults and high-angle strike-slip faults. Extensional tectonic activity followed the Laramide Orogeny and was accompanied by voluminous felsic volcanic eruptions. Numerous low-angle normal faults formed during this time. These faults have been particularly important in the Rosemont area. The extensional tectonics eventually produced the large-scale block faulting that produced the present Basin and Range Province throughout the southwestern United States. [17]

History

In 2007, Augusta Resource Corporation, Rosemont Copper's parent company, filed a Mine Plan of Operations with the U.S. Forest Service for a proposed open-pit mine in the Santa Rita Mountains section of the Coronado National Forest. [17] [7] Rosemont Copper submitted a revised mine plan in July 2007. [18] The official start to Rosemont Copper's National Environmental Policy Act (NEPA) process began in February 2008. [1]

In March 2008, The Coronado National Forest began their NEPA scoping process for the Environmental Impact Statement. [1] Over 11,000 scoping comment submissions were received. The Draft EIS for Rosemont contained approximately 400 reports on topics such as air quality, water resources, soils and reclamation, and biological resources. [19] The public comment period for Rosemont's draft EIS closed on January 31, 2012. [20] The Forest Service Southwestern Regional Office released their Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS) and draft Record of Decision (ROD) for the Rosemont Copper Project on December 13, 2013. [21] On June 6, 2017, the Coronado National Forest completed their Record of Decision for the Project (ROD). [1]

Rosemont's permits faced legal hurdles. Following his legal examination of the issued permits for the Rosemont Mine, on July 31, 2019, U.S. District Judge James Soto overturned the U.S. Forest Service's 2017 decision approving the mine and its 2013 final environmental impact statement clearing the way for that approval. Specifically, he ruled that the mining company can't put its waste rock and mine tailings on Forest Service land even though it has mining claims on it because it has failed to prove the claims are valid. [22] The Mining Act of 1872 has long been interpreted to convey the same mineral rights to such lands by the Forest Service and the Bureau of Land Management. [23]

Following the determination from Judge Soto that Rosemont's attempt to use Forest Service land for waste disposal was invalid, on August 23, 2019, General D. Peter Hemlinger PE, Division Commander, Northwestern Division, US Army Corps of Engineers wrote a letter to Ms. Katherine Ann Arnold, PE, Director of Environment for Hudbay Minerals Corporation, that rescinded Rosemont's operating permit. Gen. Hemlinger wrote: "I am writing to inform you that I am suspending your Department of the Army (DA) permit, issued on March 8, 2019, for the Rosemont Copper project (SPL-2008-00816- MB). This suspension is effective immediately." [24]

In May 2022, the Ninth Circuit upheld [4] District Court Judge Soto’s order blocking the proposed mine on grounds of the 1872 Mining Law. The Ninth Circuit’s decision was not appealed [5] to the Supreme Court.  The ruling affects other potential mines in the Ninth Circuit that may seek to dispose of waste on public lands under color of the 1872 Mining Law. [6] Hudbay is now seeking partners for a new mine proposal, Copper World, that would be entirely restricted to its privately held property near Helvetia, at least until such time as permission can be obtained for disposal of waste on federal lands. [25]

Permits and approvals

Before the Ninth Circuit ruling invalidated the basis for the use of Forest land, Rosemont Copper had secured the following major permits necessary to begin construction on the proposed mine:

The Rosemont proposal received the following approvals before the Ninth Circuit ruling:

Reactions

The concerns about mining in the northern Santa Rita Mountains revolve around potential risks to the environment, with water being the number one concern. [46]

In general, opponents argue that open-pit copper mines pollute surrounding air and water supplies with mercury, lead, arsenic or other elements and that the mine will damage regional tourism. [47] EPA has shown that copper mining in Arizona generates substantial radioactive waste, called TENORM (Technologically Enhanced Naturally Occurring Radioactive Materials), and TENORM from the Rosemont Mine has been cited as a major environmental concern.

Proponents argue that the Rosemont mine will provide economic benefits to the region, including jobs and tax revenue, [48] as well as help reduce U.S. dependence on foreign sources of minerals. [49]

Opposition to the project is led by Save the Scenic Santa Ritas (SSSR) and includes the Center for Biological Diversity, Coalition for Sonoran Desert Protection, Defenders of Wildlife, Sierra Club, Sky Island Alliance, and Tucson Audubon Society. [50]

The Rosemont Copper project has been endorsed by Arizona Builders' Alliance, [51] Alliance of Construction Trades, [52] Tucson Hispanic Chamber of Commerce Board of Directors, [53] Tucson Metropolitan Chamber of Commerce, [54] Marana Chamber of Commerce, [55] Southern Arizona Contractors Association, [56] Tucson Utility Contractors Association, [57] Arizona Contractors Association, [56] City of Benson, [58] Southeast Arizona Economic Development Group, [59] and Northern Pima County Chamber of Commerce. [55]

The Rosemont Mine has also faced considerable political opposition. The Pima County (AZ) Board of Supervisors published a memorandum in opposition to the Rosemont Mine on April 16, 2019. In part, the memorandum states: "After nearly a decade of controversy, it is clear that meaningful mitigation of this mine's impacts has not been achieved. If anything, regulatory agencies and proponents involved appear to be backsliding on their previous and specific commitments. The fundamental administration of national environmental laws is also retrogressing. Increasing levels of surprise, controversy and a sense of unfair treatment and lack of concern for the public interest has resulted in a spate of lawsuits, even as federal and state agencies have issued the requisite permits. There is no community consensus on whether the prospective benefits to the economy would outweigh the known impacts to land and water in both the Santa Cruz and Cienega watersheds. [60]

Arguments against the proposal

Arguments in favor of the proposal

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Open-pit mining</span> Surface mining technique

Open-pit mining, also known as open-cast or open-cut mining and in larger contexts mega-mining, is a surface mining technique of extracting rock or minerals from the earth from an open-air pit, sometimes known as a borrow.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">ASARCO</span> American integrated energy company

ASARCO is a mining, smelting, and refining company based in Tucson, Arizona, which mines and processes primarily copper. The company has been a subsidiary of Grupo México since 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Santa Rita Mountains</span> Landform in Pima and Santa Cruz counties, Arizona

The Santa Rita Mountains, located about 40 miles (64 km) southeast of Tucson, Arizona, extend 26 miles (42 km) from north to south, then trending southeast. They merge again southeastwards into the Patagonia Mountains, trending northwest by southeast. The highest point in the range, and the highest point in the Tucson area, is Mount Wrightson, with an elevation of 9,453 feet (2,881 m), The range contains Madera Canyon, one of the world's premier birding areas. The Smithsonian Institution's Fred Lawrence Whipple Observatory is located on Mount Hopkins. The range is one of the Madrean sky islands.

Hudbay Minerals Inc. is a diversified Canadian mining company primarily producing copper concentrate and zinc metal. Much of its history has centered on Flin Flon, Manitoba, where it has mined for over 90 years. Hudbay currently has operations in Manitoba and Peru, and is working towards building a copper mine in southern Arizona. The company also has exploration properties in Canada, Peru, Chile and the United States.

Crandon mine was a mine proposed for northeastern Wisconsin, USA. It was to be situated near the town of Crandon and the Mole Lake Ojibwe Reservation in Forest County. The mine was the center of a multi-decade political and regulatory battle between environmentalists, American Indian tribes, sportfishing groups, and the State of Wisconsin and several large mining corporations. The purchase of the mine site in 2003 by the Sokaogon Ojibwe and Forest County Potawatomi marked a major victory for the tribes and environmental activists, and raised questions about the future of mining, economics, and tribal power in Wisconsin.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kentucky Camp, Arizona</span> United States historic place

Kentucky Camp is a ghost town and former mining camp along the Arizona Trail in Pima County, Arizona, United States, near the community of Sonoita. The Kentucky Camp Historic District is listed on the National Register of Historic Places and has been since 1995. As it is located within Coronado National Forest, the United States Forest Service is responsible for the upkeep of the remaining buildings within the Kentucky Camp Historic District.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pebble Mine</span> Undeveloped copper-gold-molybdenum mineral deposit in Alaska, United States

Pebble Mine is the common name of a proposed copper-gold-molybdenum mining project in the Bristol Bay region of Southwest Alaska, near Lake Iliamna and Lake Clark. Discovered in 1987, optioned by Northern Dynasty Minerals in 2001, explored in 2002, drilled from 2002-2013 with discovery in 2005. Preparing for the permitting process began and administrative review lasted over 13 years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Environmental impact of the oil shale industry</span>

Environmental impact of the oil shale industry includes the consideration of issues such as land use, waste management, and water and air pollution caused by the extraction and processing of oil shale. Surface mining of oil shale deposits causes the usual environmental impacts of open-pit mining. In addition, the combustion and thermal processing generate waste material, which must be disposed of, and harmful atmospheric emissions, including carbon dioxide, a major greenhouse gas. Experimental in-situ conversion processes and carbon capture and storage technologies may reduce some of these concerns in future, but may raise others, such as the pollution of groundwater.

Silver mining in Arizona was a powerful stimulus for exploration and prospecting in early Arizona. Cumulative silver production through 1981 totaled 490 million troy ounces. However, only about 10% of Arizona's silver production came from silver mining. More than 80% of the state's silver was a byproduct of copper mining; other silver came as a byproduct of lead, zinc, and gold mining.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Copper mining in Arizona</span>

In Arizona, copper mining has been a major industry since the 19th century. In 2007, Arizona was the leading copper-producing state in the country, producing 750 thousand metric tons of copper, valued at $5.54 billion. Arizona's copper production was 60% of the total for the United States. Copper mining also produces gold and silver as byproducts. Byproduct molybdenum from copper mining makes Arizona the nation's second-largest producer of that metal. Although copper mineralization was found by the earliest Spanish explorers of Arizona, the territory was remote, and copper could seldom be profitably mined and shipped. Early Spanish, Mexican, and American prospectors searched for gold and silver, and ignored copper. It was not until the completion of the Southern Pacific Railroad in 1876 that copper became broadly economic to mine and ship to market.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Uranium mining in Arizona</span>

Uranium mining in Arizona has taken place since 1918. Prior to the uranium boom of the late 1940s, uranium in Arizona was a byproduct of vanadium mining of the mineral carnotite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">In situ leach</span>

In-situ leaching (ISL), also called in-situ recovery (ISR) or solution mining, is a mining process used to recover minerals such as copper and uranium through boreholes drilled into a deposit, in situ. In situ leach works by artificially dissolving minerals occurring naturally in a solid state. For recovery of material occurring naturally in solution, see: Brine mining.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Helvetia, Arizona</span> Ghost town in Pima County, Arizona

Helvetia is a ghost town in Pima County, Arizona, United States that was settled in 1891 and abandoned in the early 1920s. Helvetia is an ancient name for Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Harshaw, Arizona</span> Ghost town in Arizona, United States

Harshaw is a ghost town in Santa Cruz County in the southeastern part of the U.S. state of Arizona. The town was settled in the 1870s, in what was then Arizona Territory. Founded as a mining community, Harshaw is named after the cattleman-turned-prospector David Tecumseh Harshaw, who first successfully located silver in the area. At the town's peak near the end of the 19th century, Harshaw's mines were among Arizona's highest producers of ore, with the largest mine, the Hermosa, yielding approximately $365,455 in bullion over a four-month period in 1880.

Mining in the United States has been active since the beginning of colonial times, but became a major industry in the 19th century with a number of new mineral discoveries causing a series of mining rushes. In 2015, the value of coal, metals, and industrial minerals mined in the United States was US $109.6 billion. 158,000 workers were directly employed by the mining industry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">New World Mining District</span> Area of mineralization in Park County, Montana, United States

The New World Mining District is an area of mineralization that sits within Gallatin National Forest to the northeast of Cooke City and Yellowstone National Park, in Park County, Montana, United States. The district hosts extensive deposits of gold, silver and copper in zones of carbonate replacement. These deposits are the result of Eocene hydrothermal alteration of Cambrian carbonates related to the Absaroka volcanic field. Alteration and mineralization occur primarily within carbonate clasts hosted in a volcanic breccia pipe and in carbonate rocks that lie adjacent to that breccia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2013</span> Proposed US federal law

The Southeast Arizona Land Exchange and Conservation Act of 2013 is a bill that was introduced into the United States House of Representatives during the 113th United States Congress. H.R. 687 would authorize a land exchange in Arizona between the federal government and a mining company. Under H.R. 687, the United States Forest Service would convey about 2,400 acres of land in southeast Arizona to Resolution Copper Mining LLC in exchange for about 5,400 acres of company-owned land. Of the company land, about 1,200 acres would become part of the National Forest System, and about 4,200 acres would be administered as conservation areas by the Bureau of Land Management. If the property sought by Resolution Copper is appraised at more than the appraised value of the property that the company offers for exchange, the company could donate additional land or make a cash payment to the United States to make the final exchange of equal value. If the company’s property is appraised for more than the federal acreage, the difference in the value would be considered a donation to the federal government. According to the Committee Report on the bill, the "mine could provide up to one-quarter of the nation's estimated annual copper needs" and the mining company estimates that the "total economic impact of the mine will exceed $60 billion and support 3,700 jobs annually." Opponents of the bill argue that the swap has not been thoroughly studied, that the mining company has failed to indicate where it will get much needed water for the mine, and that Native American tribes have not been properly consulted.

Water in Arkansas is an important issue encompassing the conservation, protection, management, distribution and use of the water resource in the state. Arkansas contains a mixture of groundwater and surface water, with a variety of state and federal agencies responsible for the regulation of the water resource. In accordance with agency rules, state, and federal law, the state's water treatment facilities utilize engineering, chemistry, science and technology to treat raw water from the environment to potable water standards and distribute it through water mains to homes, farms, business and industrial customers. Following use, wastewater is collected in collection and conveyance systems, decentralized sewer systems or septic tanks and treated in accordance with regulations at publicly owned treatment works (POTWs) before being discharged to the environment.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Arizona</span> Overview of the geology of Arizona

The geology of Arizona began to form in the Precambrian. Igneous and metamorphic crystalline basement rock may have been much older, but was overwritten during the Yavapai and Mazatzal orogenies in the Proterozoic. The Grenville orogeny to the east caused Arizona to fill with sediments, shedding into a shallow sea. Limestone formed in the sea was metamorphosed by mafic intrusions. The Great Unconformity is a famous gap in the stratigraphic record, as Arizona experienced 900 million years of terrestrial conditions, except in isolated basins. The region oscillated between terrestrial and shallow ocean conditions during the Paleozoic as multi-cellular life became common and three major orogenies to the east shed sediments before North America became part of the supercontinent Pangaea. The breakup of Pangaea was accompanied by the subduction of the Farallon Plate, which drove volcanism during the Nevadan orogeny and the Sevier orogeny in the Mesozoic, which covered much of Arizona in volcanic debris and sediments. The Mid-Tertiary ignimbrite flare-up created smaller mountain ranges with extensive ash and lava in the Cenozoic, followed by the sinking of the Farallon slab in the mantle throughout the past 14 million years, which has created the Basin and Range Province. Arizona has extensive mineralization in veins, due to hydrothermal fluids and is notable for copper-gold porphyry, lead, zinc, rare minerals formed from copper enrichment and evaporites among other resources.

Twin Metals LLC is seeking approval to create and operate a copper sulfide mine near Ely, Minnesota, on Superior National Forest land. There has been significant opposition to the proposed mine, most notably because of its proximity to the Boundary Waters Canoe Area Wilderness, location within a watershed that drains into the BWCA, and the air, water, light and noise pollution and traffic effects of converting a forested area bordering the BWCA into a substantial industrial mining facility. Twin Metals is a subsidiary of the Chilean conglomerate Antofagasta, which is controlled by billionaire Andrónico Luksic. The original lease is a 1966 lease to the International Nickel Corporation.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Home | Rosemont Copper Project Environmental Impact Statement". www.rosemonteis.us.
  2. Save the Scenic Santa Ritas - Rosemont Arguments, Scenic Santa Ritas
  3. Rosemont Benefits, Southern Arizona Business Coalition
  4. 1 2 "Ctr. for Biological Diversity v. United States Fish & Wildlife Serv., 33 F.4th 1202 | Casetext Search + Citator". casetext.com. Retrieved July 15, 2023.
  5. 1 2 Davis, Tony (December 12, 2022). "Hudbay, Forest Service won't appeal ruling blocking Rosemont Mine". Arizona Daily Star. Retrieved July 15, 2023.
  6. 1 2 Davis, Tony (August 16, 2019). "'Shocking,' 'blockbuster' Rosemont Mine ruling has national implications, experts say". Arizona Daily Star. Retrieved July 15, 2023.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Mine Plan of Operations, Augusta Resource
  8. "Copper Deposits of Part of Helvetia Mining District, Pima County Arizona" (PDF).
  9. "Mining Booms", Santa Cruz Valley Heritage Alliance
  10. "Mining Booms", Archaeology Southwest
  11. "Hudbay and Augusta Agree to Friendly Acquisition". hudbayminerals.com. Retrieved July 15, 2023.
  12. 1 2 "Mine Plan of Operations", Rosemont Copper Mine
  13. "Mineral Patent Application", Bureau of Land Management
  14. "Mining Claims", Rosemont Copper Mine
  15. Mineral Resources Estimate, US Forest Service EIS
  16. Geology and Seismotectonic Review, Vector Colorado
  17. 1 2 Mine Plan of Operations, US Forest Service EIS
  18. AERMOD Modeling Report to Assess Ambient Air Quality Impacts, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
  19. List of Reports, US Forest Service EIS
  20. Public Meetings Notice, US Forest Service EIS
  21. Final Environmental Impact Statement for the Rosemont Copper Project: A Proposed Mining Operation, Coronado National Forest, Pima County, Arizona. Tucson, AZ: United States Department of Agriculture, Forest Service, Southwestern Region, 2013.
  22. Davis, Tony (August 1, 2019). "Federal judge bars Rosemont Mine construction". Arizona Daily Star. Retrieved September 7, 2021.
  23. Sonnor, Scott. "Biden agenda, lithium mine, tribes, greens collide in Nevada". Yahoo News. Associated Press. Retrieved January 6, 2023.
  24. D. Peter Helmlinger, U.S. Army Corps of Engineers (August 23, 2019). "Notice of Permit Suspension" (PDF). Letter to Rosemont Copper Company.
  25. Davis, Tony (December 12, 2022). "Hudbay, Forest Service won't appeal ruling blocking Rosemont Mine". Arizona Daily Star. Retrieved July 15, 2023.
  26. [rosemonteis.us Final Record of Decision], Coronado National Forest
  27. "Aquifer Protection Permit Issued", Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
  28. Aquifer Protection Permit, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
  29. Construction Storm Water General Permit Issued, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
  30. Construction Storm Water General Permit, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
  31. Agriculture Land Clearing Permit Issued
  32. "Agriculture Land Clearing Permit".
  33. Air Activity Permit Issued, Pima County Department of Environmental Quality
  34. Air Activity Permit, Pima County Department of Environmental Quality
  35. Air Quality Permit Issued, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
  36. Air Quality Permit, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
  37. Groundwater Withdrawal Permit Issued, Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources
  38. Groundwater Withdrawal Permit, Arizona Department of Mines and Mineral Resources
  39. Aquifer Protection Permits Issued, Arizona Department of Environmental Quality
  40. 1 2 Tucson Electric Power Transmission Line Permits Issued, Arizona Corporation Commission
  41. "Rosemont Copper Project | ADEQ Arizona Department of Environmental Quality". azdeq.gov.
  42. Rosemont Ranch Reclamation Plan, Arizona State Mine Inspector
  43. "Arizona Mining Permitting Guide" (PDF).
  44. Hazardous Waste Identification Number Issued, EPA
  45. Hazardous Waste Identification Number, EPA
  46. Gies, Erica (March 21, 2012). "A Clash Over Mining and Water". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved September 7, 2021.
  47. Analyze Socioeconomic Impacts, Scenic Santa Ritas
  48. Rosemont Copper Mine would benefit economy and community but is buried in bureaucracy, Tucson Citizen, April 14, 2011
  49. Support of Rosemont Copper, Arizona Senate
  50. Groups Opposed to Rosemont Copper, Canyon Echo
  51. Builders group endorses Rosemont Mine, Arizona Daily Star, January 27, 2011
  52. Construction Trade Group Among Endorsers of Rosemont Mine, Arizona Public Media, March 17, 2011
  53. Tucson Hispanic Chamber Endorses Rosemont Copper, May 16, 2011
  54. Tucson Chamber supports Rosemont copper mine, Inside Tucson Business, July 2, 2010
  55. 1 2 Chamber Alliance Urges Rosemont Process Move Forward, Tucson Chamber, February 1, 2012
  56. 1 2 The Arizona Contractors Association Supports Rosemont Copper Mine in Southern Arizona, June 10, 2010
  57. Builders group lines up in favor of mine, Arizona Daily Star, January 28, 2011
  58. Chamber concerned by threat, San Pedro Valley News-Sun, June 9, 2010
  59. Rosemont Copper Mine Project, Southeast Arizona Economic Development Group Blog, September 13, 2011
  60. C.H. Huckelberry, County Administrator (April 16, 2019). "US Army Corps of Engineers Approval of Rosemont Copper Project" (PDF). Letter to Pima County Board of Supervisors.
  61. Remaining Permits and Decisions Needed by Rosemont, April 2013
  62. Hudbay Minerals Inc. - Home
  63. Economic Impacts of the Proposed Rosemont Mine, Save the Scenic Santa Ritas
  64. "Rare footage of jaguar in the Santa Rita Mountains outside Tucson" (video). Los Angeles Times.
  65. Center for Biological Diversity.org: "Rosemont Mine would destroy El Jefe's home and severely hamstring recovery of jaguars in the United States" . accessed 8 May 2016.
  66. Tony Davis, (May 7, 2016). "Imperiled wildlife can live with Rosemont, US report says". Arizona Daily Star. Accessed 8 May 2016.
  67. Rosemont Copper avoiding the truth with Arizona Scenic Route 83
  68. The Environmental Protection Agency Comes-a-Copper, Forbes, May 12, 2011
  69. Initial Two-Year Water Supply Already Stored for Augusta's Rosemont Copper, Augusta Resource Press Release, June 28, 2007
  70. Supporting the Rosemont Copper Mine in Southern Arizona, Arizona State Legislature
  71. A Clash Over Mining and Water, The New York Times, March 21, 2012
  72. Tucsons News Now voices support for Rosemont Copper Mine, The More You Dig, June 26, 2012
  73. Pima County's other new copper mine: Any problems for Oracle Ridge?, Southern Arizona News-Examiner. June 12, 2012
  74. Construction industry rallies to support Rosemont mine proposal, Inside Tucson Business October 21, 2011