Selby rail crash

Last updated

Selby rail crash
GNER train steams into Alnmouth Station - 07 June 2005.jpg
66526 , North Wingfield (7649840470).jpg
An InterCity 225 led by a Driving Van Trailer (top) and a Class 66 locomotive (bottom), similar to those involved in the crash.
Details
Date28 February 2001
06:13 UTC
Location Great Heck, Selby, North Yorkshire
Coordinates 53°41′14″N1°05′53″W / 53.68722°N 1.09806°W / 53.68722; -1.09806
CountryEngland
Line East Coast Main Line
Operator
Service
CauseObstruction on line
Statistics
Trains2
Vehicles1
Deaths10
Injured82
List of UK rail accidents by year

The Selby rail crash (also known as the Great Heck Rail Crash) was a railway accident that occurred on 28 February 2001 near Great Heck, Selby, North Yorkshire when a passenger train collided with a car which had crashed down a motorway embankment onto the railway line. The passenger train then collided with an oncoming freight train. Ten people died, including the drivers of the two trains, and 82 were injured. It remains the worst rail disaster of the 21st century in the United Kingdom.

Contents

The driver of the car, Gary Hart, was convicted of ten counts of causing death by dangerous driving and sentenced to five years in prison after a jury found that he had fallen asleep while driving. As a result of the crash, Hart's insurers paid out £30 million in claims.

Background

The InterCity 225 passenger train was operating 1F23, the Great North Eastern Railway (GNER) 04:45 service from Newcastle to London King's Cross with 99 occupants onboard. It consisted of a leading Driving Van Trailer (DVT), nine Mark 4 coaches, and a trailing Class 91 locomotive. The InterCity 225 operates in a push-pull configuration; in normal operations, the DVT is the lead vehicle for southbound services such as this one, remotely controlling the pushing Class 91 locomotive at the rear. [1]

The freight train was operating 6G34, the Freightliner 05:00 service from Immingham Docks to Eggborough power station. It consisted of a leading Class 66 locomotive, and sixteen fully laden coal wagons. [2]

The car was a Land Rover Defender, which was towing a Renault Savanna. [3] It was being driven by 36-year-old Gary Hart on a 145 miles (233 km) journey from his home in Strubby, Lincolnshire, which he left at 04:40, to his work in Wigan. [4] [5]

The accident occurred on a section of the East Coast Main Line. The line speed for this section is 125 mph (201 km/h) and passes under two road bridges, one carrying the M62 motorway over the rail line. In the southbound direction, there is a trailing set of points connecting a freight yard to the Up line. [6]

Events

The accident sequence began at approximately 06:13, when the car left the westbound carriageway of the motorway just before the bridge over the rail line. The vehicle travelled down an embankment and onto the southbound railway track. [7] After a failed attempt to reverse off the track, Hart exited the vehicle and called the emergency services using his mobile telephone. During the call, the Land Rover was hit by the InterCity 225. [8] The sound of the train's horn and the collision with the car was captured on Hart's 999 call. [9]

After striking the Land Rover, the leading bogie of the Driving Van Trailer derailed, but the train stayed upright. The set of trailing points from the freight yard then deflected it into the path of the oncoming freight train. [10]

The freight train collided with the InterCity 225 approximately 2,106 feet (642 m) from the passenger train's impact with the Land Rover, resulting in the near-total destruction of the DVT and moderate to severe damage to all nine of the InterCity 225's coaches, which mostly overturned and came to rest down an embankment to the east side of the track, in a field adjacent to the railway line just south of the second overbridge. [11] The trailing locomotive of the passenger train was derailed but remained upright and suffered only minor damage. The freight locomotive lost its bogies after impact, with debris from the DVT jammed underneath, rupturing its fuel tank. [12] It overturned onto its left side, coming to rest in the garden of a residence adjacent to the line to the north of the bridge. The first nine wagons following it were derailed and damaged to varying extents. [13] Two wagons that left the line with the freight locomotive flattened a caravan and garage on the grounds of the house all three came to rest in, but stopped short of striking the house itself. [14]

Both train drivers, two additional train crew on board the InterCity 225, and six passengers were killed, all as a result of the collision with the freight train. [15] Survivors of the crash included Andrew Hill, a train driver who was travelling in the cab of the freight train, supervising the experienced driver who was learning a new route. [16]

Investigation

Her Majesty's Railway Inspectorate was notified of the crash at 06:55, and four inspectors arrived at the scene at 09:24. Another four inspectors arrived shortly thereafter. The Health and Safety Executive (HSE) released an interim report on 6 March 2001. [4] It was conducted with the assistance of several entities, including GNER and Freightliner, the operators of the trains; Railtrack, the owner of the railway infrastructure; both South and North Yorkshire Police, the British Transport Police, and the Highways Agency. [17] Investigators recovered the data recorder of the freight locomotive, but the InterCity 225 had not yet been fitted with one under GNER's rolling programme of installation. [18]

The HSE released their final report into the accident on 4 December 2002. [19] It stated that no defects were found with any of the railway infrastructure that could have contributed to the outcome of the crash, and that the motorway complied with the standards at the time. [20] A separate investigation into road standards was carried out by a working group set up by the Health and Safety Commission, which brought its own recommendations. These included carrying out risk assessments at specific locations and collecting data from incidents involving vehicles entering the railway. The working group stated that they expected a similar event to the Selby rail crash to occur every 300 to 400 years. [21]

At the time of the impact with the car, the InterCity 225 was estimated to have been travelling at a speed of 120 mph (190 km/h) to 125 mph (201 km/h). After the initial collision, the train then slowed to an estimated speed of 88 mph (142 km/h) prior to the impact with the freight train, which was estimated to have been travelling at 54 mph (87 km/h). With an estimated closing speed of 142 mph (229 km/h), the collision between the trains is the highest-speed railway incident that has occurred in the UK. [22]

The report considered the crashworthiness of the trains. The InterCity 225 had 99 occupants at the time, out of a total seating capacity of 544. The DVT suffered major damage, which included the cab being separated from the underframe. This was due to it being more lightweight, and having a lower ride height than the freight locomotive it collided with. [23] 45 of the 52 seriously injured passengers, and all eight fatalities, were travelling in the first five coaches. These coaches were noted for having the most damage, with their survival space reduced due to several impacts. Overall, the report noted that the coaches performed well in the crash, considering the high speeds involved. [24]

The front and right side of the freight locomotive suffered heavy damage as a result of the impact with the DVT. Though the locomotive's body had a robust construction, which meant it only suffered relatively minor structural damage compared to the other vehicles involved in the accident, its design meant that it did not have any energy absorbing features. The report added "Its design does not appear to complement the crashworthy considerations that guide the construction of passenger vehicles that use the same rail network." Some freight wagons impacted the passenger train's coaches, causing extensive damage. This was partially due to the angular design of the wagons, which was also noted in the Southall rail crash investigation. [25]

The report recommended that further research be conducted on how derailments occur and how the vehicles behave during them. This research should consider several factors, such as vehicle construction and safety features such as obstacle deflectors and bogie retention. It raised concerns relating to the design of freight trains as a whole, and mentioned that future designs should include features such as energy absorption functionality and bogie retention. It also stated that freight vehicles should avoid aggressive corners at possible interfaces with passenger trains in the event of a crash. Tripwires similar to those already used close to airport runways were mentioned as potentially warranting further research. These could detect the incursion of a road vehicle onto railway property, and interface with different train control systems. Although this may not help when a train is already close to the incident, it could provide an early warning to the incursion in other cases. [26]

Aftermath

Hart was tried at Leeds Crown Court on ten counts of causing death by dangerous driving. [27] He pleaded not guilty. The prosecution alleged that Hart had fallen asleep while driving, after having spent five hours the previous night on the phone to a woman he had met through an advert on an internet dating agency. [28] He had been on the phone call from 21:48 to 02:58, and sent text messages between 03:11 and 03:57. He did not get any sleep before leaving his house and starting his journey 90 minutes after the end of the phone call. [29] As part of their investigation, the police tried to replicate the drive, which was 65 miles (105 km) in 70 minutes. With a police escort, and after going like a "bat out of hell", they completed the journey with two minutes to spare. [30]

Hart denied the allegations, saying that he did not fall asleep, and he would have pulled over if he were tired. [31] He said that he could go 36 hours without sleep, and that he heard a loud bang before the car left the road, and thought it could have been a puncture. [29] [32] When asked why he initially told the police on the day of the crash that he had slept for two-and-a-half to three hours, Hart said that he was in shock. [31] He said that he hadn't got any sleep as he was "buzzing with excitement" ahead of planning to meet the woman later that day. [32]

Hart was found guilty on 13 December 2001. On 11 January 2002, he was sentenced to five years in prison and given a five-year driving ban after the jury found that he had fallen asleep while driving. [33] He was released from prison in July 2004 after serving half of his sentence, which is normal practice in the United Kingdom for this kind of sentence. [34] [35]

An inquest into the deaths of the ten victims opened on 8 September 2003 in Harrogate. [36] On 12 September 2003, the jury decided that all ten people who died in the accident were unlawfully killed. [37]

In total, Hart's insurers, Fortis, who provided him with an unlimited liability third-party fire and theft policy, paid out £30 million as a result of the crash. [38] [39] In October 2003, Fortis was a party in a legal case in the High Court, to try to recover some of the funds it had paid out. They alleged that the safety barrier was too short, and in a statement said that if it had been longer, the crash would never have happened. [40] On 30 October 2003, the judge ruled that negligence on behalf of the Highways Agency had not been established, and that Hart was the precipitating cause of the accident. [41] Fortis held a reinsurance policy, so only had to pay the first £1.5 million themselves, with the remainder being paid by Munich Re, up to the threshold of their reinsurance policy held with another provider. [42]

Memorials

The memorial garden, with the East Coast Main Line in the background, photo taken in May 2007 Memorial garden, Great Heck - geograph.org.uk - 434729.jpg
The memorial garden, with the East Coast Main Line in the background, photo taken in May 2007

A Class 66 locomotive, 66526 was named "Driver Steve Dunn (George)" by Freightliner in memory of the freight train driver killed in the collision. It carries a plaque commemorating the disaster: "In remembrance of a dedicated engineman Driver Steve (George) Dunn was tragically killed in the accident at Great Heck on 28th February 2001". [43] Dunn's son James, who was nine at the time of the crash, later became a train driver. [44] Barry Needham, another Freightliner employee killed in the crash, was also commemorated by the naming of locomotive 56115 after him. The nameplates and plaques were transferred to locomotive 60087 and later to 60091. These locomotives also carried an explanatory plaque. [45]

GNER honoured the passenger train driver, John Weddle, by naming a new driver-training school in his home city of Newcastle after him. In a ceremony attended by members of his family, his 16-year-old daughter Stephanie unveiled a plaque dedicating the school to his memory. [46]

Seventeen books of condolences were created and put out at GNER stations for the public to sign. These were damaged by a flood while in storage, but were later restored and put into a collection by the National Railway Museum. [47] A stone memorial garden was created close to the crash site, with a plaque which was unveiled by the first person on scene after the accident. [48]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great North Eastern Railway</span> Former British railway company

Great North Eastern Railway, often referred to as GNER, was a train operating company in the United Kingdom, owned by Sea Containers, that operated the InterCity East Coast franchise on the East Coast Main Line between London, Yorkshire, North East England and Scotland from April 1996 until December 2007.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Rail Class 57</span> Class of diesel-electric locomotives

The British Rail Class 57 is a type of diesel locomotive that was remanufactured from Class 47s by Brush Traction of Loughborough between 1998 and 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Hatfield rail crash</span> 2000 rail accident in Hatfield, Hertfordshire, England

The Hatfield rail crash was a railway accident on 17 October 2000, at Hatfield, Hertfordshire. It was caused by a metal fatigue-induced derailment, killing four people and injuring more than 70.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Driving Van Trailer</span> British control car

A Driving Van Trailer (DVT) is a British purpose-built control car railway vehicle that allows the driver to operate with a locomotive in push-pull formation from the opposite end of a train. A key benefit of operating trains with DVTs is the requirement for fewer locomotives; for example, a second locomotive would otherwise have to join at the other end of the train after arrival at terminal stations to lead the train's onward journey.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Rail Class 86</span> Class of British electric locomotives

The British Rail Class 86 is a class of electric locomotives built during the 1960s. Developed as a 'standard' electric locomotive from earlier prototype models, one hundred of these locomotives were built from 1965 to 1966 to haul trains on the then newly electrified West Coast Main Line (WCML) from London Euston to Birmingham, Crewe, Liverpool, Manchester and later Glasgow and Preston. Introduction of the class enabled the replacement of many steam locomotives, which were finally withdrawn by British Rail in 1968.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Rail Class 66</span> Class of diesel electric locomotives

The Class 66 is a type of six-axle diesel-electric freight locomotive developed in part from the Class 59, for use on UK railways. Since its introduction the class has been successful and has been sold to British and other European railway companies. In Continental Europe it is marketed as the EMD Class 66 (JT42CWR).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">InterCity 225</span> British train

The InterCity 225 is an electric push-pull high speed train in the United Kingdom, comprising a Class 91 electric locomotive, nine Mark 4 coaches and a Driving Van Trailer (DVT). The Class 91 locomotives were built by British Rail Engineering Limited's Crewe Works as a spin-off from the Advanced Passenger Train project, which was abandoned during the 1980s, whilst the coaches and DVT were constructed by Metro-Cammell in Birmingham and Breda in Italy, again borrowing heavily from the Advanced Passenger Train. The trains were designed to operate at up to 140 mph (225 km/h) in regular service, but are limited to 125 mph (200 km/h) principally due to a lack of cab signalling and the limitations of the current overhead line equipment. They were introduced into service between 1989 and 1991 for intercity services on the East Coast Main Line (ECML) from London King's Cross to Leeds, York and Edinburgh.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Rail Mark 4</span> Type of British railway carriage

The British Rail Mark 4 is a class of passenger carriages built for use in InterCity 225 sets on the East Coast Main Line between King's Cross, Leeds and Edinburgh. Withdrawals began in 2019, with some being sold for further use with Transport for Wales between Cardiff and Holyhead.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Rail Class 91</span> Class of high-speed electric locomotives

The British Rail Class 91 is a high-speed electric locomotive, which produces power of 4,830 kW (6,480 hp); it was ordered as a component of the East Coast Main Line modernisation and electrification programme of the late 1980s. The Class 91s were given the auxiliary name of InterCity 225 to indicate their envisaged top speed of 225 km/h (140 mph); they were also referred to as Electras by British Rail during their development and throughout the electrification of the East Coast Main Line.

The 1996 Stafford rail crash occurred on 8 March 1996 when a Transrail freight train travelling from Mossend, North Lanarkshire, to Willesden, North London, derailed after an axle on a wagon carrying liquid carbon dioxide failed due to fatigue at Rickerscote 1.4 miles (2.2 km) south of Stafford on the West Coast Main Line. Almost immediately after the derailment, a Travelling Post Office mail train hauled by a Rail Express Systems British Rail Class 86 electric locomotive collided with a section of the derailed freight train on the adjacent line and fouled the path of the TPO mail train. One person, a mail sorter, was killed in the crash and twenty others including the driver of the mail train were injured.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Rail Class 43 (HST)</span> British high speed diesel locomotive

The British Rail Class 43 (HST) is the TOPS classification used for the InterCity 125 High Speed Train diesel-electric power cars, built by British Rail Engineering Limited from 1975 to 1982, and in service in the UK since 1976.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Rail Class 90</span> British electric locomotive

The British Rail Class 90 is a type of electric locomotive. They were built for mixed-traffic duties, operating from 25 kV AC overhead lines and producing 5,000 bhp (3,700 kW). They weigh 84.5 tonnes and can typically achieve a top speed of 110 mph (177 km/h).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Polmont rail accident</span> 1984 Scotland train disaster

The Polmont rail accident, also known as the Polmont rail disaster, occurred on 30 July 1984 to the west of Polmont, near Falkirk, in Scotland. A westbound push-pull express train travelling from Edinburgh to Glasgow struck a cow which had gained access to the track through a damaged fence from a field near Polmont railway station, causing all six carriages and the locomotive of the train to derail. 13 people were killed and 61 others were injured, 17 of them seriously. The accident led to a debate about the safety of push-pull trains on British Rail.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1967 Thirsk rail crash</span> Train crash in Yorkshire, England on 31 July 1967

The Thirsk rail crash occurred on 31 July 1967 at Thirsk, Yorkshire, England on the British Rail East Coast Main Line.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High-speed rail in the United Kingdom</span>

High-speed rail in the United Kingdom is provided on five upgraded railway lines running at top speeds of 125 mph (200 km/h) and one purpose-built high-speed line reaching 186 mph (300 km/h).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Heck</span> Village in North Yorkshire, England

Great Heck is a small village in Heck parish, about 7 miles (11 km) south of Selby, North Yorkshire, England. The population of the parish was 201 at the 2011 census. It is part of the district of Selby, having been part of the West Riding of Yorkshire until 1974. The village was the site of the Great Heck rail crash in 2001.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">GB Railways</span>

GB Railways was the parent company of a number of train operating companies, running the Anglia Railways franchise from January 1997 and launching Hull Trains and GB Railfreight. GB Railways was also involved in the management of the Estonian rail company Edelaraudtee and had an investment in Great Southern Rail in Australia.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Heck railway station</span> Disused railway station in North Yorkshire, England

Heck railway station served the parish of Heck, North Yorkshire, England from 1871 to 1963 on the East Coast Main Line.

References

  1. ↑ HSE 2002, pp. 5, 24, 20.
  2. ↑ HSE 2002, pp. 27, 10.
  3. ↑ HSE 2002, pp. 9, 13.
  4. 1 2 "First report on Selby train crash". The Guardian. 6 March 2001. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  5. ↑ "Crash driver's marathon phone chats". 13 December 2001. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  6. ↑ HSE 2002, p. 9.
  7. ↑ HSE 2002, pp. 9–10.
  8. ↑ HSE 2002, p. 10.
  9. ↑ Wainwright, Martin (30 November 2001). "999 call played at rail crash court". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  10. ↑ "Respects paid on anniversary of Great Heck crash". The Yorkshire Post. 28 February 2016. Archived from the original on 11 January 2021. Retrieved 19 May 2020.
  11. ↑ HSE 2002, pp. 11, 15.
  12. ↑ HSE 2002, p. 15.
  13. ↑ HSE 2002, p. 27.
  14. ↑ "Selby rail crash: Disaster remembered 20 years on". BBC News. 28 February 2021. Retrieved 27 May 2022.
  15. ↑ HSE 2002, p. 5.
  16. ↑ Carter, Helen (10 September 2003). "Trapped driver tells of crash ordeal". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 25 August 2024.
  17. ↑ "UK Health & Safety Executive publishes interim report into Selby rail crash". Disaster Prevention and Management. 10 (4). 1 October 2001. doi:10.1108/dpm.2001.07310dab.002. ISSN   0965-3562 . Retrieved 18 August 2024.
  18. ↑ HSE 2001, p. 33.
  19. ↑ Wainwright, Martin (5 December 2002). "Rail crash inquiry calls for monitors". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  20. ↑ HSE 2002, p. 7.
  21. ↑ HSC 2002, pp. 34, 9.
  22. ↑ HSE 2002, pp. 10, 34.
  23. ↑ HSE 2002, p. 22.
  24. ↑ HSE 2002, p. 24.
  25. ↑ HSE 2002, pp. 28–29.
  26. ↑ HSE 2002, pp. 37–38.
  27. ↑ "Selby crash driver trial begins". BBC News. 28 November 2001. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  28. ↑ "Selby driver 'fell asleep' at the wheel". BBC News. 28 November 2001. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  29. 1 2 Ward, David (14 December 2001). "Fast life of man who rarely slept". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 11 August 2024.
  30. ↑ Keely, Alistair (13 December 2001). "Investigation centred on Hart's Land Rover". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 11 August 2024.
  31. 1 2 "Selby crash driver 'was not asleep'". BBC News. 5 December 2001. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  32. 1 2 North, Ian Herbert (29 November 2001). "Selby crash driver 'fell asleep in car after talking through night to internet woman'". The Independent . Retrieved 11 August 2024.
  33. ↑ Oliver, Mark (11 January 2002). "Selby crash motorist receives five year sentence". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  34. ↑ "Selby crash driver's jail release". BBC News. 12 July 2004. Archived from the original on 3 August 2019. Retrieved 17 December 2019.
  35. ↑ "Determinate prison sentences – Sentencing". Sentencing Council. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  36. ↑ "Inquest into Selby rail deaths". The Northern Echo. 8 September 2003. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  37. ↑ "Selby victims 'unlawfully killed'". 12 September 2003. Retrieved 24 August 2024.
  38. ↑ Poole, Keith (12 April 2024). "'Million-to-one' accident could leave £50m claim". Evening Standard. Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  39. ↑ Clark, Andrew (10 November 2004). "All policyholders may foot bill for expected record insurance payout". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  40. ↑ "Selby insurer's compensation claim". BBC News. 7 October 2003. Archived from the original on 26 August 2007. Retrieved 6 March 2017.
  41. ↑ Wainwright, Martin (31 October 2003). "Selby crash driver's insurers lose claim for cash". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 10 August 2024.
  42. ↑ "Munich Re faces £31m bill for Selby rail crash". Informa Insurance News 24. 23 May 2001.
  43. ↑ Marsden, Colin (November 2001). "Freightliner honours Great Heck driver...and twins with Enron". The Railway Magazine. Vol. 147, no. 1207. London: IPC Media. p. 65. ISSN   0033-8923.
  44. ↑ "Courage of families praised at Great Heck memorial service". The York Press. 28 February 2011. Archived from the original on 2 April 2015. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
  45. ↑ Dingle, Geoffrey. "60087 at Stafford". Railway Herald. Archived from the original on 7 March 2017. Retrieved 6 March 2017.
  46. ↑ "Selby rail driver honoured". BBC News. 10 July 2002. Archived from the original on 30 July 2004. Retrieved 4 March 2015.
  47. ↑ "Selby rail disaster books of condolence are painstakingly restored, after being damaged by York floods". York Press. 9 April 2016. Retrieved 7 September 2024.
  48. ↑ Wainwright, Martin (1 March 2002). "Memorial services held for Selby rail crash victims". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 24 August 2024.

Sources

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.