2021 Salisbury rail crash

Last updated

2021 Salisbury rail crash
Salisbury Tunnel Junction collision aerial.jpg
Aerial view of the crashed trains
Salisbury Tunnel Junction crash RAIB diagram.jpg
Diagram of the crash by the Rail Accident Investigation Branch
 
Details
Date31 October 2021 (2021-10-31)
18:45
LocationFisherton Tunnel
1 mi (1.6 km) north east from Salisbury
Coordinates
CountryUnited Kingdom
Line Wessex Main Line
West of England Main Line
Operator Great Western Railway
South Western Railway
Owner Network Rail
Service Portsmouth HarbourBristol Temple Meads (GWR)
London WaterlooHoniton (SWR)
Incident typeSidelong collision and derailment
Cause Signal passed at danger due to low railhead adhesion and driver error
Statistics
Trains2
Passengers197
Crew5
Deaths0
Injured14 (1 serious)
Location diagram
BSicon CONTg.svg
BSicon CONTg.svg
BSicon STR.svg
N
BSicon ABZ2l.svg
BSicon STRc3.svg
BSicon ABZgr.svg
S
Laverstock North and South Junctions
BSicon STRc1.svg
BSicon INCIDO.svg
BSicon ABZg+4.svg
Salisbury Tunnel Junction
BSicon TUNNEL1.svg
Fisherton Tunnel
BSicon BHF.svg
Salisbury
BSicon CONTgq.svg
BSicon ABZgr.svg
Wessex Main Line to Bristol Temple Meads
BSicon numN270.svg
BSicon CONTf.svg
West of England line to Exeter St Davids

The Salisbury Rail Crash was a railway accident on 31 October 2021, at Salisbury, Wiltshire, United Kingdom. Two trains, travelling on converging lines, collided at Salisbury Tunnel Junction, approximately one mile (1.5 kilometres) northeast of Salisbury railway station. Fourteen people, including one of the train drivers, were taken to hospital.

Contents

Incident

158762 pictured in 2021 Westbury DMU Sidings - GWR 158762 (70807).JPG
158762 pictured in 2021
158763 pictured in 2020 Bathpool - GWR 158763+158747 Cardiff service.JPG
158763 pictured in 2020
159102 pictured in 2010 Westbury railway station MMB 38 159102.jpg
159102 pictured in 2010

On 31 October 2021, Great Western Railway's (GWR) 17:08 Portsmouth Harbour to Bristol Temple Meads service (reporting number 1F30) operated by two-carriage Class 158s 158762 and 158763 was passing through Salisbury Tunnel Junction where the Wessex Main Line converges with the West of England Main Line. At the same time, the South Western Railway's (SWR) 17:20 London Waterloo to Honiton service (reporting number 1L53) operated by three-carriage Class 159 159102 was approaching the junction. [1] [2] The SWR train failed to stop at signal SY31, 240 yards (220 m) from Salisbury Tunnel Junction, which was displaying a red aspect. [2] [3] [4] GWR's 16:58 Bristol Parkway to Fratton service (reporting number 1F27) had passed clear of Salisbury Tunnel Junction, going towards Eastleigh, less than 40 seconds before 1L53 arrived at the junction. [5]

At 18:45, the leading carriage of the SWR train collided with the side of the third carriage of the GWR train, causing both trains to derail as they entered Fisherton Tunnel. The rear two carriages of the GWR train and front two carriages of the SWR train were derailed. [2] [4] The SWR train was travelling at 52 miles per hour (84 km/h) at the time of the collision; the GWR train was travelling at 20 miles per hour (32 km/h). [6]

Emergency services, including Wiltshire Police and the British Transport Police, attended the scene, [7] as did the Dorset & Wiltshire Fire and Rescue Service who declared a major incident. National Police Air Service and HM Coastguard despatched helicopters to the scene. [8] The railway lines through the tunnel were closed as a result of the incident.

The accident was the first involving a collision between two moving in-service passenger trains in the United Kingdom since the Ladbroke Grove rail crash on 5 October 1999. [9]

Passengers and crew

Of the 197 passengers and five crew on board the trains, [6] 13 were injured. [5] All but one were taken to Salisbury District Hospital by ambulance. [10] Four of those taken to hospital were admitted, with three of them being discharged later, and nine were treated for their injuries before being sent home. [10] Thirty other people walked to a temporary casualty centre established in a local church. [10] The driver of the SWR train was initially trapped in his cab before being freed and taken to hospital, where his injuries were described as life-changing. [8] [10] [11] He was flown to Southampton General Hospital for treatment, [2] and was released three weeks later. [6]

Aftermath

The accident closed both the Wessex Main Line and West of England Main Line, affecting services between Portsmouth Harbour and Westbury and between Basingstoke and Exeter St Davids respectively. [12] Network Rail stated that the track at the junction required heavy refurbishment and that the track through the tunnel may also need to be relaid. [13] Unit 158762, the leading unit of the GWR train, [2] was not damaged [14] and was removed by rail on 4 November. One of the remaining five carriages was also removed from the site that day. It was lifted from the railway by crane and removed by road. [15] Class 59 locomotive 59003 was used to drag the remaining derailed carriages out of the tunnel.[ citation needed ] The A30 London Road was closed until 9 November to allow for the recovery of the carriages and for investigators to carry out their work. [16] After repairs to the track, the line through the tunnel reopened on 16 November. [17] The front carriage of 159102 was written off, as was unit 158763. [6]

Reporting of the story

Initial reports of the accident, based on a leaked Network Rail log, led to highly inaccurate reporting of the accident in its immediate aftermath. The Evening Standard reported that a derailed locomotive had been left a "sitting duck" for seven minutes after the rear carriage of a train derailed and was then run into by another train after signalling failed. [18] Rail magazine editor Nigel Harris pointed out that the only facts in the story were the location and services involved. The leak led to the MailOnline reporting similarly, with a "senior Network Rail manager" quoted as saying: [19]

According to my system, the signalling system was aware seven minutes before impact. It should've automatically stopped the train. It should've automatically set all signals to red. If the driver didn't see the signal, the system should've made the train stop.

An initial statement put out by Network Rail also contained inaccuracies. Although it was quickly corrected, Harris said that "the genie was already out of the bottle". The Network Rail log initially reported that the GWR driver had reported hitting an obstruction and derailing. The log was updated seven minutes later to record the collision, which is where the press got their "seven minutes sitting duck" scenario. Under the current system, train operating companies, the British Transport Police, and the Office of Rail and Road can all issue statements. [19] Rail contributor Christian Wolmar also criticised the early coverage. In his opinion, the initial errors were made worse by Network Rail's Safety and Engineering Director Martin Frobisher, who appeared on BBC Radio 4's Today programme on 1 November and did not correct any of the errors at a time when, according to Wolmar, he must have known them to be untrue. Wolmar praised the Rail Accident Investigation Branch (RAIB) for publishing its initial report just three days after the accident. [20]

Investigations

A Rail Head Treatment Train cleaning tracks at the crash site during a scheduled visit a few weeks later Salisbury Tunnel Junction - Network Rail 98922-98972 RHTT.JPG
A Rail Head Treatment Train cleaning tracks at the crash site during a scheduled visit a few weeks later

The RAIB deployed a team of inspectors to the scene. The Office of Rail and Road also opened an investigation. [21] The British Transport Police also opened an investigation. [22]

On 2 November the RAIB stated that initial evidence indicated that, although the SWR driver had applied the brakes, his train had failed to stop at a signal and collided with the GWR train; wheel slide, as a result of low railhead adhesion, was the most likely cause. [3] [23] Announcing a formal investigation on 3 November, the RAIB said that the On Train Data Recorder showed that the driver had made an emergency brake application twelve seconds after he initially applied the brakes, and that a further emergency brake demand had been made by the Train Protection & Warning System fitted to the train. [4]

RAIB said they would examine how Network Rail managed the risk of loss of adhesion at the track site and also any SWR policy for preventing or mitigating wheel slip on their trains. SWR commented that its driver had acted in an "impeccable way in a valiant attempt to keep passengers safe". [24] The West of England Line had not had a Rail Head Treatment Train over it since 29 October, although one had been scheduled to travel over the line before the accident occurred. [14] An interim report was published on 21 February 2022. [5]

RAIB interim report

The interim report found that the driver of 1L53 approached signal SY29R at 90 mph (140 km/h) and shut off power. The line at this point was on a 1 in 169 falling gradient. The signal was displaying a double yellow aspect. About one mile (1.5 kilometres) past the signal the train was travelling at 86 mph (138 km/h) and a brake application was made and the wheels began to slide. A full service brake application was followed by an emergency brake application. As the train approached signal SY31, the overspeed sensor fitted to the train detected that the train was travelling in excess of the 34.5 mph (55.5 km/h) permitted when a red aspect was displayed and the TPWS demanded emergency braking, which was already being applied by the driver. The front carriage of 1L53 collided with the rear carriage of 1F30 at a speed between 52 and 56 mph (84 and 90 km/h). [5]

The collision caused the coupling between units 158762 and 158763 to break. The unit at the front of the train was undamaged and came to a halt inside the tunnel. Both carriages of the unit at the rear of 1F30 were derailed against the tunnel wall. The front two of the three carriages of 159102 were derailed. The driver of 1L53 was knocked unconscious and trapped in his cab. The alarm was raised by the driver of 1F30 using the GSM-R radio system. [5]

Subsequent analysis of the railway line approaching Salisbury Tunnel Junction revealed that the line was contaminated by the residue of fallen leaves between 80 miles 32 chains (129.39 km) and 82 miles 36 chains (132.69 km) (distances measured from London Waterloo). A coefficient of friction of between 0.2 and 0.02 was recorded, with most of the readings towards the lower end of the scale. The last Rail Head Treatment Train had passed over the line at 11:06 on 30 October, and the next one was scheduled to pass over at 23:00 on 31 October. The gap of 36 hours was in excess of Network Rail Wessex's requirement to treat the line at least once every 24 hours. On 27 June 2023, the RAIB reported that the draft of the final report had been sent to interested parties as part of the statutory consultation process. The final report would be issued following such consultation. [5]

RAIB final report

The RAIB released their final report on 24 October 2023. Ten recommendations were made. [6]

See also

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Signal passed at danger</span> Train passing stop signal without authority

A signal passed at danger (SPAD), known in the United States as a stop signal overrun (SSO) and in Canada as passing a stop signal, is an event on a railway where a train passes a stop signal without authority. This is also known as running a red.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ufton Nervet rail crash</span> 2004 rail crash caused by suicide of a car driver

The Ufton Nervet rail crash occurred on 6 November 2004 when a passenger train collided with a stationary car on a level crossing on the Reading–Taunton line near Ufton Nervet, Berkshire, England. The collision derailed the train, and seven people—including the drivers of the train and the car—were killed. An inquest found that all railway personnel and systems were operating correctly, and the crash was caused by the suicide of the car driver.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">British Rail Class 222</span> Diesel multiple-unit high-speed passenger train

The British Rail Class 222 Meridian is a diesel-electric multiple-unit high-speed passenger train capable of 125 mph (200 km/h). Twenty-seven sets were built by Bombardier Transportation in Bruges, Belgium.

The Charfield railway disaster was a fatal train crash which occurred on 13 October 1928 in the village of Charfield in the English county of Gloucestershire. The London, Midland and Scottish Railway (LMS) Leeds to Bristol night mail train failed to stop at the signals protecting the down refuge siding at Charfield railway station. The weather was misty, but there was not a sufficiently thick fog for the signalman at Charfield to employ fog signalmen. A freight train was in the process of being shunted from the down main line to the siding, and another train of empty goods wagons was passing through the station from the Bristol (up) direction.

The 1995 Ais Gill rail accident occurred near Aisgill, Cumbria, UK, at about 18:55 on 31 January 1995, when a class 156 Super-Sprinter was derailed by a landslide on the Settle-Carlisle Railway line, and was subsequently ran into by a similar train travelling in the opposite direction. The Guard of the first train was fatally injured in the collision.

There have been a number of train accidents on the railway network of Victoria, Australia. Some of these are listed below.

The railways of New South Wales, Australia have had many incidents and accidents since their formation in 1831. There are close to 1000 names associated with rail-related deaths in NSW on the walls of the Australian Railway Monument in Werris Creek. Those killed were all employees of various NSW railways. The details below include deaths of employees and the general public.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Grayrigg derailment</span> 2007 rail transport disaster in Grayrigg, England

The Grayrigg derailment was a fatal railway accident that occurred at approximately 20:15 GMT on 23 February 2007, just to the south of Grayrigg, Cumbria, in the North West England region of the United Kingdom. The accident investigation concluded that the derailment was caused by a faulty set of points on the Down Main running line, controlled from Lambrigg ground frame. The scheduled inspection on 18 February 2007 had not taken place and the faults had gone undetected.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Western Railway accidents</span>

Great Western Railway accidents include several notable incidents that influenced rail safety in the United Kingdom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Little Cornard derailment</span> 2010 train collision with lorry in Suffolk, England

The Little Cornard derailment occurred on 17 August 2010 when a passenger train collided with a road vehicle on a level crossing on the Gainsborough Line near Little Cornard, Suffolk, and partly derailed. The vehicle, a tanker lorry, had begun crossing over the track when the Class 156 train from Sudbury destined for Marks Tey struck it whilst travelling at a speed of approximately 40 miles per hour (64 km/h).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2016 Croydon tram derailment</span> 2016 fatal derailment in south London

On 9 November 2016, a tram operated by Tramlink in London derailed and overturned on a sharp bend approaching a junction. Of 69 passengers, there were seven fatalities and 62 injured, 19 of whom sustained serious injuries. This was the first tram incident in the United Kingdom in which passengers died since 1959.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stonehaven derailment</span> Train derailment in Scotland

The Stonehaven derailment was a fatal railway accident that occurred at 09:38 BST on 12 August 2020, when a passenger train returning to Aberdeen hit a landslip, near Carmont, west of Stonehaven in Aberdeenshire, Scotland, following severe rain. Of the nine people aboard, three were killed, and six were injured.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Llangennech derailment</span> 2020 freight train derailment in Wales

On 26 August 2020 a freight train carrying diesel fuel and gas oil in tank wagons derailed at Morlais Junction, Llangennech, Carmarthenshire, Wales. Some of the derailed wagons caught fire, leading to an evacuation of people living nearby. There was widespread contamination from the spilled fuel. The clean-up operation was described by Natural Resources Wales as the most challenging since the Sea Empress oil spill in 1996. The accident was caused by defective brakes on a wagon causing an axle to seize, which in turn caused deformation of the track under the train as it travelled over a set of points. The Heart of Wales Line was closed for seven months as a result of the derailment.

References

  1. "Salisbury train crash: Driver suffers 'life-changing injuries'". BBC News . 1 November 2021. Retrieved 1 November 2021.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 ""Slippery rails" cause train collision at Salisbury". Rail Magazine . No. 944. 17 November 2021. pp. 6–7.
  3. 1 2 "Salisbury train crash: 'Low adhesion' is most likely cause". BBC News. 2 November 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 "Collision between passenger trains at Salisbury Tunnel Junction". Rail Accident Investigation Branch . Retrieved 3 November 2021.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Interim Report: Collision between passenger trains at Salisbury Tunnel Junction 31 October 2021" (PDF). Rail Accident Investigation Branch. 27 June 2023 [Original date 21 February 2022]. Retrieved 27 June 2023.
  6. 1 2 3 4 5 "Collision between passenger trains at Salisbury Tunnel Junction. Wiltshire 31 October 2021" (PDF). Rail Accidents Investigation Branch. Retrieved 24 October 2023.
  7. "Officers respond to train collision involving two trains close to Salisbury". Wiltshire Police. Archived from the original on 31 October 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
  8. 1 2 "Salisbury train crash: Major incident as two trains collide". BBC News. 31 October 2021. Archived from the original on 31 October 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
  9. Topham, Gwyn (1 November 2021). "Does Salisbury train crash point to wider problems on the network?". The Guardian . Archived from the original on 1 November 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021.
  10. 1 2 3 4 Davies, Gareth (1 November 2021). "Salisbury train crash: Driver left with 'life-changing' injuries" . The Daily Telegraph . Retrieved 1 November 2021.
  11. Hayes, Andy. "Passengers injured after two trains collide in 'major incident' near Salisbury station". Sky News . Retrieved 31 October 2021.
  12. Evans, Ryan (1 November 2021). "Rail passengers warned not to travel between Basingstoke and Salisbury on Monday". Basingstoke Gazette. Archived from the original on 5 November 2021. Retrieved 27 August 2022.
  13. Horgan, Rob. "Network Rail preparing for 'heavy refurbishment' of track as trains lifted away". New Civil Engineer . Retrieved 5 November 2021.
  14. 1 2 Clifton, Paul (17 November 2021). "RAIB's early analysis pinpoints low adhesion". Rail Magazine . No. 944. Peterborough: Bauer Media Ltd. pp. 8–9. ISSN   0953-4563.
  15. "Salisbury train crash: Line to stay closed for 10 days". BBC News. Retrieved 4 November 2021.
  16. "Salisbury train crash: London Road reopens". BBC News Online. 9 November 2021. Retrieved 11 November 2021.
  17. "Salisbury train crash: Services fully resume two weeks on". BBC News Online. Retrieved 16 November 2021.
  18. France, Anthony (2 November 2021). "Salisbury: Derailed carriage sitting duck after 'major signal flaw'". Evening Standard. Retrieved 3 June 2022.
  19. 1 2 Harris, Nigel (17 November 2021). "Salisbury: a media own goal". Rail Magazine. No. 944. Peterborough: Bauer Media Ltd. p. 3. ISSN   0953-4563.
  20. Wolmar, Christian (17 November 2021). "Misleading statements led to ill-informed speculation". Rail Magazine. No. 944. Peterborough: Bauer Media Ltd. pp. 44–45. ISSN   0953-4563.
  21. "Driver trapped and critical incident declared as two trains crash outside Salisbury". ITV News . 31 October 2021. Retrieved 31 October 2021.
  22. "Investigation into Salisbury train collision". British Transport Police . Retrieved 1 November 2021.
  23. "RAIB Statement: Salisbury rail accident". Department for Transport News. Rail Accident Investigation Branch. 2 November 2021. Archived from the original on 2 November 2021. Retrieved 2 November 2021.
  24. "Salisbury train crash: Driver acted impeccably, says operator". BBC News. 3 November 2021. Retrieved 3 November 2021.