The Graham Children

Last updated

The Graham Children
William Hogarth 047.jpg
Artist William Hogarth
Year1742 [1]
Medium Oil on canvas
Dimensions160.5 cm× 181 cm(63.2 in× 71 in)
Location National Gallery, London

The Graham Children is an oil painting completed by William Hogarth in 1742. It is a group portrait depicting the four children of Daniel Graham, apothecary to King George II. The youngest child had died by the time the painting was completed.

Contents

Provenance

The painting was in the ownership of Richard Robert Graham, depicted on the far right of the painting, at least until his death in 1816. It then had several owners before it was acquired by Lord Duveen who presented it to the British National Gallery in 1934. [2]

Composition

Serpentine lines on The Graham Children. The Graham Children with serpentine S.jpg
Serpentine lines on The Graham Children.

The Graham Children is a conversation piece, [3] an informal group portrait of family or friends, often engaged in conversation or some other kind of activity, [4] though the painting is larger than a typical work of that type. From left to right in the picture are Thomas, born 1740 and dressed in skirts as was typical for small boys until they were breeched, Henrietta, Anna Maria and Richard. [note 1]

Infant mortality in Britain was high in the eighteenth century, even for the children of the wealthy, and Thomas had died before the painting was completed. [1] [5] Hogarth used a study, probably completed after Thomas's death, as the basis for his image. With its numerous references to death and the passage of time, it may be that the painting is a form of memorial for Thomas. [5]

The children are painted life size, surrounded by plush furnishings and fabrics that reflect the family's wealth. A gilded bird cage is suspended from a cord and Thomas sits in an ornate baby cart with a fine silver fruit bowl at his feet. Richard plays a tune on a bird-organ, apparently making the bird sing.

The French Rococo was at its height in the 1730s and its influence can be seen in the painting despite Hogarth not visiting France until 1743. [6] William Gaunt thought that Hogarth was more familiar with current French painting than he liked to admit. [7] The girl's aprons form serpentine S's, vertically in the oldest child, ending as it falls over her arm, and horizontally in the younger girl. A similar shape can be seen in the falling curtain on the right. The heads of the children and the cat create another noticeable S shape. The fruit bowl, a common subject in Rococo art, has been described as a "bravura piece of still-life painting" untypical of Hogarth's work. [2]

Study of Thomas Graham, William Hogarth, c. 1742. Black and red chalk on grey paper, British Museum, London. 22 x 27 cm. Study of Thomas Graham by William Hogarth c. 1742.jpg
Study of Thomas Graham, William Hogarth, c. 1742. Black and red chalk on grey paper, British Museum, London. 22 x 27 cm.

Themes

David Bindman described The Graham Children as having a theme worthy of a history painting. [8] Hogarth turned what could have been a simple family scene, even one with a tragic edge, into a parable about the “passing of time and the vulnerability of innocence”. [2] The picture plays with time with different parts moving at different speeds. The boys are captured in mid movement, like the cat and bird, while the girls seem to be completely still, so that the picture is both a snap shot of a fleeting moment and a static portrait simultaneously. The oldest, Henrietta, holds the wrist of the youngest, perhaps indicating her future role as a mother, but not tightly and neither exchange looks, but neither do any of the children. Henrietta, instead, looks at the spectator, indicating her awareness of the adult world that she will soon join. The other children, however, remain in the innocent bubble of childhood. [2]

Thomas is fascinated by the glistening cherries held by his sister, which in Christian iconography represent the fruit of Paradise and the antidote to original sin, and for Henrietta symbolise the challenges she will soon face as she enters adulthood. Anna Maria practices the dance steps and curtseys that will be required of her in society, and Richard enjoys the musical performance of the finch. His bird-organ bears an image of Orpheus from Greek mythology, referring to the temporary harmony of man and nature that cannot last. [9] [10] On the clock stands a small winged figure with scythe and hour glass representing the passage of time, while the smiling cat eyes the caged bird, referring to the fragility of life. A wooden bird adorns the baby cart, like the caged bird unable to take flight. The crossed flowers at the baby's feet refer to the Christian legend that pink carnations sprang from the earth at the spot where Mary's tears fell after she saw Jesus carrying the cross, thus making the flower a symbol of motherly love. [11]

The bird depicted is a goldfinch, which for centuries had symbolised the Redemption, appropriate here because of Thomas's death. [12] [13] [note 2]

Hogarth included wit and pathos in the same scene by audaciously placing the predatory cat in one corner and the recently deceased child in the other. The reaction of Thomas's parents to this combination, which might have been seen as in poor taste, is unknown. The painting remained in Richard Graham's possession until at least 1816. [2]

Details

Antecedents

The Five Eldest Children of Charles I, Anthony van Dyck, 1637. Oil on canvas, Royal Collection, London. Anthony van Dyck - Five Eldest Children of Charles I - Google Art Project.jpg
The Five Eldest Children of Charles I, Anthony van Dyck, 1637. Oil on canvas, Royal Collection, London.

The Graham Children invited comparison with Anthony van Dyck's The Five Eldest Children of Charles I (1637). [14] Both included animals for comic effect and took care to give each child an individual character. However, while Van Dyck (1599–1641) was commissioned by King Charles I to paint royalty, Hogarth's portraits were mainly of the rising middle class, and he never broke through to become a court painter. Unlike the children of Charles I, there is nothing aristocratic about The Graham Children, despite their affluence, and the allusion to the earlier work may have been a deliberate attempt by Hogarth to flatter his middle class client. [2]

Hogarth's paintings of children

From around the 1730s, Hogarth developed a genre of playful conversation pieces far removed from the grand history paintings that he really wanted to produce but for which he had no commissions. [15] He was working against a background of what has been called a "new world" of childhood where the attitude to children was becoming more liberal. Family groups in painting became less formal and began to show parents and children enjoying recreational activities together. Portraits of individual children became more common than they had been in the seventeenth century and the idea of the "innocence" of childhood began to take root based on the view that the child was an uncorrupted blank slate as advocated by John Locke in his book Some Thoughts Concerning Education (1693). [16] [17] If the child was now innocent, however, the picture remained the product of a commercial transaction between the client and the artist and continued to fulfil a social function of demonstrating the happy family life and social status enjoyed by the customer. It also stood in a tradition of portrait painting of adults and children that had well established conventions. [18]

In 1730, Hogarth had produced the "before and after" pair The House of Cards and The Tea Party where various minor mishaps occur relating to a house of cards and a doll's tea party. Numerous clues in both works suggest a more serious message about broken marriage hopes and loss but the full facts are not known. [19]

The Cholmondeley Family of 1732 also included similar ingredients of impending disaster as a playful child goes to push over a pile of books while the older generation sit by, frozen, to be reanimated when the books fall. But in this work it is the mother who is included despite having died prior. Well stocked bookcases line the background which the adults can use to civilise the wild children. [20]

See also

Notes

  1. The children are misidentified in Einberg's Manners & Morals, corrected in her Hogarth the Painter.
  2. Friedmann listed 486 paintings by 254 artists. [13]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Joshua Reynolds</span> English painter (1723–1792)

Sir Joshua Reynolds was an English painter who specialised in portraits. John Russell said he was one of the major European painters of the 18th century. He promoted the "Grand Style" in painting, which depended on idealisation of the imperfect. He was a founder and first president of the Royal Academy of Arts and was knighted by George III in 1769.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">William Hogarth</span> English artist and social critic (1697–1764)

William Hogarth was an English painter, engraver, pictorial satirist, social critic, editorial cartoonist and occasional writer on art. His work ranges from realistic portraiture to comic strip-like series of pictures called "modern moral subjects", and he is perhaps best known for his series A Harlot's Progress, A Rake's Progress and Marriage A-la-Mode. Knowledge of his work is so pervasive that satirical political illustrations in this style are often referred to as "Hogarthian".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">English art</span> Overview of the art of England

English art is the body of visual arts made in England. England has Europe's earliest and northernmost ice-age cave art. Prehistoric art in England largely corresponds with art made elsewhere in contemporary Britain, but early medieval Anglo-Saxon art saw the development of a distinctly English style, and English art continued thereafter to have a distinct character. English art made after the formation in 1707 of the Kingdom of Great Britain may be regarded in most respects simultaneously as art of the United Kingdom.

A Rake's Progress is a series of eight paintings by 18th-century English artist William Hogarth. The canvases were produced in 1732–1734, then engraved in 1734 and published in print form in 1735. The series shows the decline and fall of Tom Rakewell, the spendthrift son and heir of a rich merchant, who comes to London, wastes all his money on luxurious living, prostitution and gambling, and as a consequence is imprisoned in the Fleet Prison and ultimately Bethlem Hospital (Bedlam). The original paintings are in the collection of Sir John Soane's Museum in London, where they are normally on display for a short period each day.

Joseph Grozer (1755–1799) was an English artist and printmaker. He resided at No 8, Castle Street, Leicester Square (1792-4) and published some of his prints himself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Johan Zoffany</span> German painter (1733–1810)

Johan Joseph Zoffany was a German neoclassical painter who was active mainly in England, Italy and India. His works appear in many prominent British collections, including the National Gallery, the Tate Gallery and the Royal Collection, as well as institutions in continental Europe, India, the United States and Australia. His name is sometimes spelled Zoffani or Zauffelij.

Martin Postle is a British art historian who is deputy director for collections and publications at the Paul Mellon Centre for Studies in British Art, London, and a leading expert on the art of Sir Joshua Reynolds. He is a former curator at the Tate Gallery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gawen Hamilton</span> Scottish painter

Gawen Hamilton, easily confused with the later, more prominent artist Gavin Hamilton, was a Scottish painter working in London, a member of the Rose and Crown Club. He was one of the first wave of British born painters of 'conversation pieces' along with contemporaries such as William Hogarth and Charles Philips. These are works that depict groups of friends, families and acquaintances often engaging in a variety of genteel activities such as playing cards or taking tea. Some of Hamilton's pieces depict gatherings of artists and craftsmen such as the Rose and Crown Club itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Philippe Mercier</span> Painter (1689–1760)

Philippe Mercier was an artist of French Huguenot descent from the German realm of Brandenburg-Prussia, usually defined to French school. Active in England for most of his working life, Mercier is considered one of the first practitioners of the Rococo style, and is credited with influencing a new generation of 18th-century English artists.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">James Latham (painter)</span>

James Latham was an Irish portrait painter.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thomas Gibson (artist)</span> English painter and copyist (1680–1751)

Thomas Gibson was an English portrait painter and copyist, notable as the teacher of George Vertue. He was born and died in London.

<i>The Age of Innocence</i> (painting) Painting by Joshua Reynolds

The Age of Innocence is an oil-on-canvas painting by Sir Joshua Reynolds, created in either 1785 or 1788 and measuring 765 x 638 mm. The sitter is unknown, but possibly, was Reynolds's great-niece, Theophila Gwatkin, or Lady Anne Spencer (1773–1865), the youngest daughter of the 4th Duke of Marlborough, who would have been twelve in 1785 and fifteen in 1788. The painting was presented to the National Gallery in 1847 by Robert Vernon and has hung in the Tate Britain since 1951.

Balthazar or Balthasar Nebot, was a painter active in England between 1729 and 1765.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Daniel Graham (apothecary)</span>

Daniel Graham was apothecary to King George II, King George III and Chelsea College Hospital. He was the son of Thomas Graham who was apothecary to King George I and George II, and was apothecary general to the British army.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Richard Robert Graham</span>

Richard Robert Graham was apothecary to the Chelsea College Hospital. He was the son of Daniel Graham who was apothecary to King George I and George II, and was apothecary general to the British army.

<i>A Rakes Progress, 3: The Tavern Scene</i> Painting by William Hogarth from the series A Rakes Progress

Tavern Scene or The Orgy is a work by William Hogarth from 1735, the third picture from the series A Rake's Progress.

Judith Emilie Egerton was an Australian-born British art historian and curator. She specialised in eighteenth-century British art and, particularly, the work of George Stubbs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trump (dog)</span> Pug owned by the English artist William Hogarth

Trump was a pug owned by English painter William Hogarth. He included the dog in several works, including his 1745 self-portrait Painter and his Pug, held by the Tate Gallery. In the words of the Tate's display caption, "Hogarth's pug dog, Trump, serves as an emblem of the artist's own pugnacious character."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Frances Byron, Baroness Byron</span>

Frances, Baroness Byron, was the second daughter of William Berkeley, 4th Baron Berkeley of Stratton, and his wife Frances Temple. She was the third wife of William Byron, 4th Baron Byron and a great-grandmother of the poet Lord Byron.

References

  1. 1 2 The Graham Children. The National Gallery. Retrieved 7 December 2014.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 The Tate Gallery: An Illustrated Companion to the National Collections of British & Modern Foreign Art. London: Tate Gallery, 1979, p. 15. ISBN   0905005473
  3. Bindman, David. "Hogarth, William (1697–1764)" Oxford Dictionary of National Biography , Oxford University Press, 2004, online edition, May 2009. Retrieved 7 December 2014. (subscription required)
  4. Glossary: Conversation Piece. The National Gallery. Retrieved 7 December 2014.
  5. 1 2 Postle, Martin. (2005) "The Age of Innocence: Child Portraiture in Georgian Art and Society", in Pictures of Innocence: Portraits of Children from Hogarth to Lawrence. Bath: Holburne Museum of Art, p. 73. ISBN   0903679094
  6. Einberg, Elizabeth. (1997) Hogarth the Painter. London: Tate Gallery Publishing, p. 19 & 39. ISBN   1854372343
  7. Gaunt, William. (1964) A Concise History of English Painting. London: Thames and Hudson, p. 58.
  8. Bindman, David. (1981) Hogarth. London: Thames & Hudson, p. 144. ISBN   050020182X
  9. Einberg, Elizabeth. (1987) Manners & Morals: Hogarth and British Painting 1700–1760. London: Tate Gallery, p. 141. ISBN   0946590842
  10. Lindsey, Jack. (1977) Hogarth: His Art and his World. London: Hart-Davis, MacGibbon, p. 118. ISBN   0246108371
  11. Becker, Udo. (2000). The Continuum Encyclopedia of Symbols. New York: Continuum. pp. 52–53. ISBN   978-0-8264-1221-8.
  12. "The Graham Children". In-depth description. The National Gallery. Retrieved 21 February 2022.
  13. 1 2 Friedmann, Herbert (1946). Symbolic Goldfinch: Its History and Significance in European Devotional Art. New York: Pantheon. pp. 6, 66. OCLC   294483.
  14. Postle, p. 10.
  15. Waterhouse, Ellis. (1994) Painting in Britain: 1530–1790. 5th edition. New Haven and London: Yale University Press, pp. 168–169. ISBN   0300058330
  16. Postle, pp. 8 & 11.
  17. Plumb, J.H. "The New World of Children in Eighteenth-Century England", Past & Present , No. 67, May 1975, pp. 64–95.
  18. Postle, p. 9.
  19. Description by Elizabeth Einberg in Postle, pp. 28–29.
  20. Postle, pp. 12 & 30.