People of the Philippines v. Joseph Ejercito Estrada, Jose "Jinggoy" Estrada, Charlie "Atong" Tiu Hay Sy Ang, Edward S. Serapio, Yolanda T. Ricaforte, Alma Alfaro, John Doe also known as Eleuterio Ramos Tan or Mr. Uy, Jane Doe also known as Delia Rajas, John Does and Jane Does
The trial of PhilippinepresidentJoseph Estrada (People of the Philippines v. Joseph Estrada, et al., 26558 Sandiganbayan) took place between 2001 and 2007 at the Sandiganbayan. Estrada resigned from office in 2001 during a popular uprising in Metro Manila after an aborted impeachment trial in which he was charged with plunder and perjury. After his ouster, on April 4, 2001, Estrada and seven others were charged with plunder.
On September 12, 2007, the Sandiganbayan ruled Estrada not guilty of perjury while ruling him as guilty of plunder and sentenced him to reclusión perpetua. Co-accused Atong Ang pleaded guilty to a lesser offense, and Jinggoy Estrada and Edward Serapio were acquitted.
Background
The Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (PCIJ) ran and completed an investigation on the hidden wealth of President Joseph Estrada in 2000. PCIJ's report documented shell corporations, mistresses' homes and other assets worth $40 million, many acquired since the start of his term as President in 1998.[1] The Estrada administration tried to pressure the media to not run the story.[2]
In October 2000, the House of Representatives held hearings on the "juetenggate" scandal, during which Ilocos Sur Governor Chavit Singson alleged Estrada's involvement in gambling payoffs, called Estrada "the lord of all jueteng lords", and alleged that Estrada took bribes from tobacco taxes.[3]
Charges
A few months after the January 2001 popular uprising that ousted Estrada, the Philippine Ombudsman filed two charges at the Sandiganbayan on April 4, 2001; one for plunder and the other for perjury.[4]
Joseph and Jinggoy Estrada were the first elected officials to be so charged under the Philippines' Anti-Plunder Law. Jinggoy Estrada, who was the mayor of San Juan City at the time the plunder case was filed was the first incumbent elected official to be sued.[4]
Joseph Estrada was accused of pocketing ₱4 billion from jueteng pay-offs and misappropriating tobacco excise tax funds.[4] The plunder case consisted of four separate charges: acceptance of ₱545 million from proceeds of jueteng, an illegal gambling game; misappropriation of ₱130 million in excise taxes from tobacco; receiving a ₱189.7-million commission from the sale of the shares of Belle Corporation, a real estate firm; and owning some ₱3.2 billion in a bank account under the name Jose Velarde. The minor charge of perjury is for Estrada under-reporting his assets in his 1999 statement of assets, liabilities and net worth and for the illegal use of an alias, namely for the Jose Velarde bank account.
Estrada's son, Jinggoy Estrada, a former senator, and Edward Serapio, his personal lawyer, were his co-accused. Also charged were Charlie Ang, Yolanda Ricaforte, Alma Alfaro, Eleuterio Tan, Delia Rajas, and Jaime Dichaves, who was later added.
The plunder charge was based on a complaint filed before the Ombudsman by Dante Jimenez, human rights lawyer Romeo Capulong, trial lawyer Leonard de Vera, 1971 Constitutional Convention delegate Ramon A. Gonzales, lawyers Antonio T. Carpio and Dennis B. Funa. One complaint was docketed as OMB-0-00-1756 (Romeo T. Capulong, Leonard de Vera and Dennis B. Funa v. Joseph Ejercito Estrada et al.; see Victor Tan Uy v. Office of the Ombudsman et al., G.R. No. 156399-400, June 27, 2008). On January 22, 2001, two days after his implied resignation from office, President Estrada was ordered by the Ombudsman to file his counter-affidavit in answer to the complaints. Finding probable cause, the complaint was filed as Criminal Case No. 26558.[5][6][7][8][9][10]
Joseph Estrada, Jinggoy Estrada, and Serapio refused to enter a plea during their arraignment in July 2001, which prompted the Sandiganbayan to submit a plea of not guilty on behalf of the accused.[11]
Estrada's lawyers filed a petition before the Philippine Supreme Court to declare the anti-plunder law as unconstitutional; Joseph Estrada was a signatory of the law when he was senator.[12] In November 2001, the Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the anti-plunder law.[13]
Trial
The Philippine government's prosecution team was led by Special Prosecutor Dennis Villa-Ignacio and other government lawyers.
The court heard 74 witnesses for the prosecution.[14] Witnesses included former Equitable-PCI Bank officials Clarissa Ocampo and Manuel Curato[15] and Ilocos Sur Gov. Chavit Singson.[14]
Former President Joseph Estrada's defense panel was led by Estelito Mendoza and composed of former Supreme Court justices and other Philippine lawyers.
Verdict
Initial reports of the nature of the conviction pronounced Estrada guilty of the ₱545 million jueteng case and the Belle Corporation case, while the other two charges were dropped. Estrada was sentence to reclusión perpetua and was ordered to return to the government over ₱200 million funds funneled to the Erap Muslim Youth Foundation (named after Estrada's nickname "Erap") and ₱189 million Jose Velarde monies, the penalty of civil interdiction, and perpetual absolute exclusion from public office. The Court also ordered the arrest of all the other co-defendants in the case.
On September 12, 2007, Joseph Estrada was acquitted of perjury but found guilty of plunder and sentenced to reclusión perpetua with the accessory penalties of perpetual disqualification from public office and forfeiture of ill-gotten wealth. The decision declared the forfeiture in favor of the government: ₱542.701 million (bank accounts including interest), ₱189 million (Jose Velarde accounts including interest) and the Boracay Mansion in New Manila, Quezon City. The Sandiganbayan acquitted Joseph Estrada's son, Senator Jinggoy Estrada, and lawyer Edward Serapio of plunder charges.[16][17]
Estrada returned to his villa in Tanay, Rizal (driven on a golf cart to a helicopter)[18] with permission from the court.[19]
In 2007, co-accused Atong Ang pleaded guilty to bribing a public official, a lesser offense that carried a lighter sentence.[20]
Joseph Estrada is the first Philippine President to be convicted of plunder.[21]
Appeal
On September 26, 2007, Joseph Estrada filed a motion for reconsideration of the Sandiganbayan conviction.[22][23] Estrada alleged that the court erred "when it convicted him by acquitting his alleged co-conspirators."[24]
The Sandiganbayan set oral arguments for Estrada's motion for reconsideration for October 19, 2007. Estrada asked the court for permission to attend the hearing.[25]
Pardon and release from detention
On October 22, 2007, Acting Justice Secretary Agnes Devanadera stated that Joseph Estrada was seeking a "full, free, and unconditional pardon" from President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. Estrada's lawyer Jose Flaminiano wrote Arroyo that Estrada was withdrawing his motion for reconsideration of the verdict. Estrada said that he wanted to spend time with his sick mother.[26][27]
On October 25, 2007, President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo granted executive clemency to Joseph Estrada based on the recommendation by the Department of Justice. Acting Executive Secretary and Press Secretary Ignacio R. Bunye quoted the signed order: "In view hereof in pursuant of the authority conferred upon me by the Constitution, I hereby grant Executive clemency to Joseph Ejercito Estrada, convicted by the Sandiganbayan of plunder and imposed a penalty of reclusion perpetua. He is hereby restored to his civil and political rights." Bunye noted that Estrada committed in his application not to seek public office, and Estrada was freed from his Tanay resthouse on October 26, 2007.[28][29][30][31]
Aftermath
In September 2007, chief presidential legal counsel Sergio Antonio Apostol stated that Sandiganbayan Justices Teresita de Castro, Diosdado Peralta and Francisco Villaruz Jr. should decline Judicial and Bar Council nomination and await other vacancies to ease pressure on President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.[32]Senate of the Philippines Majority Leader Francis Pangilinan, ex-officio member, Judicial and Bar Council stated that the three Sandiganbayan justices "should have the delicadeza [gentleness] not to accept a promotion to the highest tribunal to dispel any suspicion that they pronounced Mr. Estrada guilty expecting a reward from Palace ... We do not want to see a cloud of suspicion over the appointees to the Supreme Court. They should always be above suspicion."[33]
On November 5, 2007, Senator Jinggoy Estrada, in a privileged speech vowed to block the appointment to the Supreme Court of Sandiganbayan Justices Teresita De Castro and Francisco Villaruz Jr. (who convicted his father - President Joseph Estrada). Jinggoy said that: "Such a promotion would seem like a reward in exchange for the guilty verdict against the deposed President. We are convinced, then and now, that the special court created to exclusively try the case of President Estrada was established precisely to convict him, which is what exactly happened."[34]
Joseph Estrada opposed court seizure of his assets, stating that he acquired the assets while he was still a movie actor. However, the Sandiganbayan stated that the pardon did not nullify the forfeiture of his assets.[35]
On December 4, Sandiganbayan Special Division chairperson Teresita de Castro was appointed as the new associate justice of the Supreme Court of the Philippines.[36]
On January 10, 2008, Edgardo Urieta, Sandiganbayan chief of the Sheriff and Security Services Office released the two-page report (based on thirteen-page Banco de Oro to the Sandiganbayan Special Division) which discovered intact due to the 2001 levy by BIR distraint - ₱1.107 billion ($1 = ₱41) account of Joseph Estrada: ₱500 million - "promissory note and chattel mortgage"; 450 million shares of Waterfront Philippines valued at ₱427.5 million; and 300 million shares of Wellex Industries worth ₱84 million; cash deposits in a common trust fund investment account of ₱95.76 million.[37]
As of 2013, Joseph Estrada still owed the government over ₱P400 million, according to a Sandiganbayan compliance report.[38]
Reactions
The Philippine government, through Presidential Spokesperson Ignacio Bunye issued a statement to the effect of the government's respect and deference to the authority of the Sandiganbayan. President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo stated that the court's decision must be accepted. President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo canceled a scheduled attendance at a gathering of business leaders in Makati that afternoon due to security reasons owing to pro-Estrada protests.[39]
The prosecution's lead counsel Dennis Villa-Ignacio asserted: "It shows that our judicial system really works. This is the last chance for the state to show that we can do it, that we can charge, prosecute and convict a public official regardless of his stature."[40]
The Philippine Stock Exchange recovered from a two-day slump, closing at 3,307.60 points, up by 1.21%. The Philippine peso moderately strengthened against the US dollar.
The Philippine Chamber of Commerce and Industry said it will support a presidential pardon for Estrada. Jinggoy Estrada said "The people will receive this [decision] with moral outrage and disgust."[41][42]
Estrada stated that "I thought the role of justice would prevail here but really it's a kangaroo court." Estrada's counsel Rene A.V. Saguisag issued the statement: "It's victors' justice. It's ruling class justice. The special division (of the court) was programmed to convict. We never had a chance."[43]
Joseph Estrada stated that "I feel depressed, but it's my style not to show it." Before the release of the judgment, he warned that he prevent his fans from protesting in the streets.[44]
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
