Corruption in the Philippines

Last updated

The Philippines suffers from widespread corruption, [1] which developed during the Spanish colonial period. [2] [3] According to GAN Integrity's Philippines Corruption Report updated May 2020, the Philippines suffers from many incidents of corruption and crime in many aspects of civic life and in various sectors. Such corruption risks are rampant throughout the state's judicial system, police service, public services, land administration, and natural resources. The 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored the Philippines at 34. When ranked by score, the Philippines ranked 115th among the 180 countries in the 2023 Index. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90 (ranked 1), the worst score was 11 (ranked 180), and the average score was 43.

Contents

Examples of corruption in the Philippines include graft, bribery, cronyism, nepotism, impunity, embezzlement, extortion, racketeering, fraud, tax evasion, vote buying, lack of transparency, lack of sufficient enforcement of laws and government policies, and consistent lack of support for human rights. [4]

Researchers have proposed that corruption and poor governance as among the causes of poverty in the Philippines. [5]

The Philippines signed the United Nations Convention against Corruption on December 9, 2003, with the Senate ratifying the convention on November 6, 2006. In 2012, the Senate declared that National Anticorruption Day shall be celebrated yearly on December 9. [6]

Perceived decline and resurgence

Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index scores a list of countries on a scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean"), then ranks them by score. The country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. [7] In 2012, President Benigno Aquino said that, according to Transparency International, the factors driving the progress in the Philippines' Corruption Perception Index scores at that time were improved government service and reduced red tape. [8] Between 2012 and 2014, the Philippines's score rose from 34 to its highest-ever score of 38. [9]

A November 2020 Transparency International survey of nearly 20,000 citizens from 17 countries, surveyed mostly between June and September 2020, showed that Filipinos have more confidence in their government's tackling of corruption than their Asian neighbors, although they also believe corruption in government remains a big problem. Of Philippine respondents 64% thought that corruption had decreased in the last 12 months, while 24% believed that it had increased. This was better than the average across Asia, where only 32% believed that corruption had decreased and 38% said that it had increased. [10]

In contrast, Transparency International reported the Philippines as a "significant decliner" in score for the region in 2021 and 2022; the country dropped to a score of 33 in those years from its 2014 high of 38. [11] [12] The 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored the Philippines at 34. When ranked by score, the Philippines ranked 115th among the 180 countries in the 2023 Index. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90 (ranked 1), the worst score was 11 (ranked 180), and the average score was 43. [13] For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Asia Pacific countries [Note 1] was 87, the lowest score was 15 and the average score was 45. [12]

Plunder, graft, and malversation

The Anti-Plunder Law (Republic Act 7080) was signed into law after the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos was toppled in the 1986 People Power Revolution. The law was filed in the Senate by Senator Jovito Salonga and in the House of Representatives by Representative Lorna Verano-Yap. The measure was signed into law by President Corazon Aquino in 1991. Salonga said that previous laws against corruption "were clearly inadequate to cope with the magnitude of the corruption and thievery committed during the Marcos years". [14]

In 1997, the first plunder case was filed against tax official Dominga Manalili. She and two others were convicted of plunder in 2001 by the Quezon City Regional Trial Court for diverting P260 million of tax payments to unauthorized bank accounts. [14]

In 2001, former President Joseph Estrada and incumbent San Juan Mayor Jinggoy Estrada became the first elected officials to be charged with plunder. Joseph Estrada was accused of pocketing P4 billion in jueteng bribes and excise taxes from tobacco. He was convicted of plunder by the Sandiganbayan anti-graft court in 2007 and later pardoned by President Gloria Macapagal Arroyo. [14]

In 2012, the Philippine Office of the Ombudsman filed a P366-million plunder case against Arroyo over the alleged misuse of intelligence funds assigned to the Philippine Charity Sweepstakes Office. In 2013, Arroyo and Janet Lim Napoles were charged with plunder over the Malampaya fund scam. [14]

In 2014, incumbent senators Bong Revilla, Jinggoy Estrada, and Juan Ponce Enrile along with Janet Lim Napoles were charged with plunder before the Sandiganbayan for allegedly pocketing kickbacks in the pork barrel scam. [15]

As of 2016, there have been 33,772 cases of corruption filed before the Sandiganbayan. Of these, 10,094 are malversation cases and 7,968 are graft cases. [16]

Stolen wealth of the Marcos family

The total amount of the fortune that the Marcos family stole during the dictatorship of Ferdinand Marcos is estimated at $10 billion. [17] The Supreme Court of the Philippines has issued three separate rulings ordering the Marcoses to return the wealth stolen from the country. [18]

Corruption in the police service and armed forces

The Police System of the Philippines poses a high risk of corruption, with the Philippines National Police (PNP) considered to be one of the most corrupt institutions within the country. There are several reports of national police officers and members of the military engaging in criminal activities such as extortion, corruption and involvement in local rackets. Private businesses also report that they cannot solely rely on the support of the police and half of them choose to pay for private security. [4]

According to CNN Philippines, Police Commissioner Sombero was under investigation in a corruption case for allegedly facilitating a PHP50 million bribe from gambling tycoon Jack Lam, who tried to bribe immigration authorities to release approximately 1,300 Chinese nationals who were working in his resorts illegally. [19]

Corruption in the judicial system

Corruption in the Philippine judicial system is also a major problem. Bribery and irregular payments in return for favorable judicial decisions are quite common. Although judicial officials are independent by law, rich and powerful groups and individuals wield control and influence over the judicial system and influence the outcomes of civil and criminal proceedings. Financial investment dispute often take an unnecessarily long time due to staffing shortages, lack of resources, and corruption in the court system. The low salaries of judicial officials help exacerbate the problem of bribery in exchange for favors. The judiciary is also criticized for making non-transparent and biased judicial decisions. [4]

P6 million bribery case

On May 24, 2024, the National Bureau of Investigation arrested a Pasay City Regional Trial Court, Branch 108, employee In flagrante delicto accepting a P6 million bribe for a favorable ruling in a civil case. The suspect confessed that his acts were upon the “Presiding Judge” Albert T. Cansino's [20] order. The case originated from an anonymous extortion complaint emailed to the Judicial Integrity Board.

CJ Alexander Gesmundo directed Office of the Court Administrator Raul B. Villanueva to submit a report and recommendation on May 27. [21] [22]

In the administrative proceeding docketed as "A.M. No. 24-05-21-SC", the High Tribunal ordered a 90 calendar days preventive suspension of Judge Albert T. Cansino and OIC, Acting Court clerk Mariejoy P. Lagman. Both were entrapped of bribery with the use of five P 1,000 marked bills and P 6 million boodle money. “In addition to the money, a copy of the order bearing the judge’s signature on the civil case was also confiscated,” the SC confirmed. [23] [24]

In the separate criminal investigation, the NBI Cybercrime Division, Chief Jeremy C. Lotoc said that the cases will be filed with the DOJ against Clerk Lagman for graft, direct bribery, and violation of the Code of Conduct and Ethical Standards for Public Officials and Employees. [25] The Department of Justice in a Resolution dated May 24 charged Mariejoy Lagman for the crimes of direct bribery (Article 210, Revised Penal Code), including violations of Section 3(b), R.A. No. 3019, and Section 7(d), R.A. 6713. Judge Cansino, however, will be subject to the regular preliminary hearing under the Revised Rules on Criminal Procedure. [26]

Political nepotism and cronyism

The Philippine political arena is mainly arranged and operated by families or alliances of families, rather than organized around the voting for political parties. [27] Called the padrino system, one gains favor, promotion, or political appointment through family affiliation (nepotism) or friendship (cronyism), as opposed to one's merit. The padrino system has been the source of many controversies and corruption in the Philippines.

According to the Civil Service Commission (CSC), nepotism is a form of corruption or abuse of authority that violates Article IX (B), Section 2 (2) of the Constitution that states that "Appointments in the civil service shall be made only according to merit and fitness to be determined, as far as practicable, and, except to positions which are policy-determining, primarily confidential, or highly technical, by competitive examination." Nepotism favors a few individuals and compromises fairness in the hiring and promotion process in government. [28]

Notes

  1. ↑ Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Fiji, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, New Zealand, North Korea, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Vanuatu, and Vietnam

See also

General

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption Perceptions Index</span> Country ranking by public sector corruption

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is an index that scores and ranks countries by their perceived levels of public sector corruption, as assessed by experts and business executives. The CPI generally defines corruption as an "abuse of entrusted power for private gain". The index is published annually by the non-governmental organisation Transparency International since 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sandiganbayan</span> Special appellate collegial court in the Philippines

The Sandiganbayan is a special appellate collegial court in the Philippines that has jurisdiction over criminal and civil cases involving graft and corrupt practices and other offenses committed by public officers and employees, including those in government-owned and controlled corporations. The special court was established by Presidential Decree No. 1486. It was subsequently modified by Presidential Decree No. 1606 and by Republic Acts 7975, 8249 and 10660. It is equal in rank to the Court of Appeals, and consists of fourteen Associate Justices and one Presiding Justice. The Office of the Ombudsman owns exclusive authority to bring cases to the Sandiganbayan.

While hard data on corruption is difficult to collect, corruption in Indonesia is clearly seen through public opinion, collated through surveys as well as observation of how each system runs.

Bahrain became a party with United Nations Convention against Corruption in 2010 after signing it in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Bangladesh</span>

Corruption in Bangladesh has been a continuing problem. According to all major ranking institutions, Bangladesh routinely finds itself among the most corrupt countries in the world.

Corruption in Turkey is an issue affecting the accession of Turkey to the European Union. Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index scores 180 countries according to their perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 to 100. Since the current scale was introduced in 2012, Turkey's score has fallen from its highest score of 50 (2013) to its lowest, current score of 34 (2023). When the 180 countries in the Index were ranked by their score, Turkey ranked 115 in 2023. For comparison with worldwide scores, the average score was 43, the best score was 90, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Eastern European and Central Asian countries was 53, the average score was 35 and the lowest score was 18.

Corruption in Lithuania describes the prevention and occurrence of corruption in Lithuania.

Corruption in Sweden has been defined as "the abuse of power" by Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå). By receiving bribes, bribe takers abuse their position of power, which is consistent with how the National Anti-Corruption Unit of the Swedish Prosecution Authority specifies the term. Although bribes and improper rewards are central in the definition of corruption in Sweden, corruption in the sense of "abuse of power" can also manifest itself in other crimes such as misuse of office, embezzlement, fraud and breach of trust against a principal.

Corruption in Switzerland describes the prevention and occurrence of corruption in Switzerland.

Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored Germany at 78 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Germany ranked 9th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Western European and European Union countries was 90, the average score was 65 and the lowest score was 42.

Corruption in Slovenia is examined on this page.

Corruption in South Korea is moderate compared to most countries in the Asia–Pacific and the broader international community. Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored South Korea at 63 on a scale between 0 and 100. When ranked by score, South Korea ranked 32nd among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among the countries of the Asia–Pacific region was 85, the average score was 45 and the lowest score was 17.

Corruption in Jordan is a social and economic issue.

Corruption in Uzbekistan is a serious problem. There are laws in place to prevent corruption, but enforcement in terms of laws regarding corruption is very weak. Low prosecution rates of corrupt officials is another contributing factor to the rampant corruption in Uzbekistan. It is not a criminal offense for a non-public official to influence the discretion of a public official. The judicial system faces severe functional deficits due to limited resources and corruption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Bolivia</span>

Corruption in Bolivia is a major problem that has been called an accepted part of life in the country. It can be found at all levels of Bolivian society. Citizens of the country perceive the judiciary, police and public administration generally as the country's most corrupt. Corruption is also widespread among officials who are supposed to control the illegal drug trade and among those working in and with extractive industries.

Corruption in Tajikistan is a widespread phenomenon that is found in all spheres of Tajik society. The situation is essentially similar to that in the other former Soviet republics of Central Asia. Reliable specifics about corruption can be difficult to come by, however, as can hard information about the effectiveness of supposed anti-corruption initiatives.

Corruption in Ecuador is a serious problem. In 2014, the U.S. Department of State cited Ecuador's corruption as a key human-rights problem. According to Freedom House, "Ecuador has long been racked by corruption", and the weak judicial oversight and investigative resources perpetuate a culture of impunity.

Corruption in Guinea-Bissau occurs at among the highest levels in the world. In Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index for 2023, Guinea-Bissau scored 22 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Guinea-Bissau ranked 158th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. However, Guinea-Bissau's score has either improved or remained steady every year since its low point in 2018, when it scored 16. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score in 2023 was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the average score among sub-Saharan African countries was 33. The highest score in sub-Saharan Africa was 71 and the lowest score was 11. In 2013, Guinea-Bissau scored below the averages for both Africa and West Africa on the Mo Ibrahim Foundation’s Index of African Governance.

Corruption in Chad is characterized by nepotism and cronyism. Chad received a score of 20 in the 2023 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Chad ranked 162nd among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the average score among sub-Saharan African countries was 33. The highest score in sub-Saharan Africa was 71 and the lowest score was 11.

Corruption in Taiwan is noted for significant anti-corruption strides. Out of 180 countries, Taiwan, or the Republic of China, ranked 28th in Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) in 2023. Key issues needing improvements include graft, bribery, and unethical practices.

References

  1. ↑ Jurado, Emil (March 12, 2010). "The fourth most corrupt nation". Manila Standard Today. Archived from the original on March 14, 2010. Retrieved August 21, 2010.
  2. ↑ Quah, Jon S. T. (July 21, 2011). Curbing Corruption in Asian Countries: An Impossible Dream?. Emerald Group Publishing. pp. 115–117. ISBN   978-0-85724-820-6 . Retrieved September 4, 2020.
  3. ↑ Sriwarakuel, Warayuth (2005). Cultural Traditions and Contemporary Challenges in Southeast Asia: Hindu and Buddhist. CRVP. p. 294. ISBN   978-1-56518-213-4 . Retrieved March 30, 2021.
  4. 1 2 3 "The Philippines Corruption Report". GAN Integrity. Archived from the original on August 12, 2022. Retrieved October 17, 2021.
  5. ↑ Jimenez, Jaime. "Commentary: Corruption steals from the poor". Philippine Star. Retrieved January 15, 2024.
  6. ↑ Panganiban, Artemio V. (December 22, 2012). "Anticorruption campaign goes global". Philippine Daily Inquirer. Retrieved February 12, 2024.
  7. ↑ "The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption Perceptions Index is calculated". Transparency.org. Retrieved May 14, 2023.
  8. ↑ Cheng, Willard. "PH corruption going, going, but not yet gone". abs-cbnnews.com. ABS-CBN News.
  9. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2022: Philippines". Transparency.org. Retrieved May 14, 2023.
  10. ↑ Charm, Neil (November 25, 2020). "Corruption still a big problem — survey | BusinessWorld". BusinessWorld. Archived from the original on November 25, 2020. Retrieved March 30, 2021.
  11. ↑ "CPI 2021 for Asia Pacific: Grand corruption and lack of freedoms holding back progress". Transparency.org. Retrieved May 14, 2023.
  12. 1 2 "CPI 2022 for Asia Pacific: Basic freedoms restricted as anti-corruption efforts neglected". Transparency.org. Retrieved April 4, 2024.
  13. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2023: Phippines". Transparency.org. Retrieved April 4, 2024.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Bueza, Michael (June 21, 2014). "Plunder in the Philippines". Rappler. Retrieved January 15, 2024.
  15. ↑ Bernal, Buena (June 6, 2014). "3 PH senators charged with plunder over PDAF scam". Rappler. Retrieved February 9, 2024.
  16. ↑ Buan, Lian (January 22, 2017). "Tracking Sandiganbayan: Who's who in PH's biggest corruption cases?". Rappler. Retrieved January 15, 2024.
  17. ↑ Davies, Nick (May 7, 2016). "The $10bn question: what happened to the Marcos millions?". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  18. ↑ "The Philippine Supreme Court ruled three times that Ferdinand Marcos must give back millions he stole from his country". Fact Check. December 4, 2019. Retrieved January 21, 2024.
  19. ↑ "Sombero Tries To Clear Name, Says There Was 'Extortion' Not 'Bribery'". CNN Philippines. February 16, 2017.
  20. ↑ "PASAY CITY, Regional Trial Court (RTC) Branch 108, Pasay". Supreme Court of the Philippines. May 1, 2023. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
  21. ↑ "STATEMENT ON THE ARREST OF A COURT EMPLOYEE FOR BRIBERY". Supreme Court of the Philippines. May 24, 2024. Retrieved May 24, 2024.
  22. ↑ Murcia, Alvin (May 24, 2024). "Pasay court worker nabbed for accepting P6-M bribe". Daily Tribune (Philippines) . Retrieved May 24, 2024.
  23. ↑ Ayalin, Adrian (May 29, 2024). "Pasay judge, court employee suspended over alleged bribery". ABS-CBN News and Current Affairs . Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  24. ↑ "Pasay City Judge and Court Employee Suspended for Suspicion of Bribery". Supreme Court of the Philippines. May 28, 2024. Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  25. ↑ Damicog, Jeffrey (May 29, 2024). "NBI eyes 'involvement' of other persons in P6M 'extortion' in a Pasay City trial court". Manila Bulletin . Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  26. ↑ Bolledo, Jairo (May 29, 2024). "DOJ prosecutors OK criminal cases vs court employee in bribery scandal". Rappler . Retrieved May 29, 2024.
  27. ↑ Coronel, Chua, Rimban, & Cruz The Rulemakers Philippine Center for Investigative Journalism (2007); p.49
  28. ↑ Peña, Kurt Dela (January 27, 2022). "Nepotism: The complex, distasteful act of naming relatives to gov't posts". Inquirer. Retrieved February 18, 2022.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.