Corruption in Romania

Last updated

Corruption in Romania has decreased in recent years. [1] In particular since 2014, Romania undertook a significant anti-corruption effort that included the investigation and prosecution of medium- and high-level political, judicial and administrative officials by the National Anticorruption Directorate. [2] The National Anticorruption Directorate was established in 2002 by the Romanian government to investigate and prosecute medium and high-level corruption related offenses, using a model of organization inspired by similar structures in Norway, Belgium and Spain. [3] [4] Adrian Zuckerman, the US Ambassador in Romania, has stated in 2021 that "the rule of law has been strengthened in Romania". [5] Since 2022, the effectiveness of the investigation and sanctioning of high-level corruption further improved, including by advancing on cases that had been pending for years for procedural reasons. [6]

Contents

Due to the successful tackling of corruption cases while leading the Romanian DNA during 2013–2018, Romanian prosecutor Laura Codruța Kövesi has been assigned as the first European Chief Prosecutor.

Background

After the fall of the communist regime in 1989, Romania has implemented a series of judicial reforms in order to bring itself to EU standards, such as the creation of the National Anticorruption Directorate in 2002, which would prosecute high-level cases of corruption. Since entering the EU, Romania has improved transparency and accountability in the public sector, although weaknesses still remained. [7]

In 2012, the European Commission expressed concerns about the rule of law, pointing to the power struggle between Prime Minister Victor Ponta and President Traian Băsescu, which gave rise to what is called the 2012 political crisis. [8] [9] The commission also criticized Romania for failing to root out corruption in its state institutions. [10] One year later, the Chamber of Deputies passed without parliamentary debate several controversial amendments to the Penal Code, including that the country's president, senators, members of the lower chamber, as well as lawyers are no longer to be considered "public officials". [11] [12] These actors can as a result take part in illicit interests without being held accountable for abuse of office, bribery, conflicts of interest and other corruption crimes. [13] The amendments were sharply criticized by Romanian opposition parties and European leaders, [14] while the Constitutional Court of Romania cataloged this move as unconstitutional. [15] The proposed changes to the Penal Code were finally repealed due to large-scale civil protests in 2017.

Since 2014, an anti-corruption drive has been launched by the National Anticorruption Directorate, which led to arrests of many high-ranking officials in government, business, as well as judges and prosecutors. [16]

Romania implemented the revised EU Public Procurement Directives in 2016 by passing new laws to improve and make public procurements more transparent. [17] The National Agency for Public Procurement (ANAP) has general oversight over procurements and can draft legislation, but procurement decisions remain with the procuring entities. State entities as well as public and private beneficiaries of EU funds are required by law to follow public procurement legislation and use the e-procurement system. Sectoral procurements, including private companies in energy and transportation, must follow the public procurement laws and tender via the e-procurement website. The April 2021 EU Country Report for Romania, which included data on the public procurement system in Romania for the period between 2018 and 2020, noted that the practical application of innovation-driven public procurement solutions remained a challenge. [17]

As of March 2022, Romania was implementing 12 commitments from their 2020-2022 action plan. This action plan featured commitments related to civic space, participation, consultation, social services, anti-corruption, fiscal transparency, justice and integrity, health and social accountability, de-bureaucratization, and open data. [17]

Colectiv nightclub fire and subsequent protests

In terms of scandals, corruption was cited among many issues that provoked the 2012–15 social unrest, the 2015 protests following the Colectiv nightclub fire, and the 2017 protests. Since the Colectiv nightclub fire, the Romanian civil society has been sensitive to corruption issues undertaken at political levels, in both parliament as well as the government.

Asset and interest disclosure

In Romania, the electronic submission of asset and interest disclosures is mandatory since January 2022, though some challenges exist with regard to the effective verification of the submitted data. [6]

Statistics

According to Transparency International's annual Corruption Perceptions Index, as of 2022 Romania is ranked as the 63rd least corrupt country in the Index. The Corruption Perceptions Index scores 180 countries on a scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean") and then ranks the countries by score. The country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. [18] Romania's 2022 rank of 63rd derives from a score of 46. For comparison, the best score was 90 (ranked 1) and the worst score was 12 (ranked 180). [19] In recent years, Romania's rank has improved from 69th in 2020 and 70th in 2019, scoring 44 in both years. [20] [21]

In the 2014 EU Anti-Corruption Report, 57% of the Romanians were most likely to say they are personally affected by corruption (at par with Cyprus). [22]

Anti-corruption efforts

In 2014, the National Anticorruption Directorate indicted 1,138 authorities. Among them were politicians, judges and prosecutors, and businessmen. [16]

In 2015, the number of filed cases against high-level politicians and businessmen that committed corrupt acts increased by an additional 1,250 people and has had a substantial social impact. Out of those people are Prime Minister Victor Ponta, 5 ministers, and 21 parliamentarians. [23] There have been 970 final convictions throughout the year and the amount of damages recovered has increased to €194.37 million. [23]

In 2016, 1,270 more people were brought to trial, including 3 ministers, 17 parliamentarians, 47 mayors, 16 magistrates, and 21 CEOs. [24] The amount of damages recovered has increased to €226 million. [23]

2017 marked the year where an additional 997 individuals were accused and found guilty by the National Anticorruption Directorate, including the former President of the Chamber of Deputies, 6 parliamentarians, 3 ministers, 49 mayors, 6 magistrates and 11 CEOs. [25] The amount of damages recovered has decreased to €159.5 million. [25]

In January 2017, the newly appointed government modified the Penal Code and Penal Procedure Code overnight as a way to fix the issue of overcrowding in prisons. [26] Opponents released accusations that the government has actually modified the Codes as a way to decriminalize political corruption, to release former politicians from prison without punishment and to stop any accusations and investigations made to current authorities. [27] 24 hours later, the biggest protest since the fall of communism was witnessed, with 300,000 civilians manifesting their opposition to the government's actions in front of Victoria Palace. [28] In February 2017, the protests held reached an unprecedented turnout of 500,000 people. [29] The anti-corruption measures taken by civilians resulted in the withdrawal of the bills and the resignation of the former minister of justice. [30] Since then, multiple protests composed of hundreds of thousands of Romanians have continued as a way to tackle corruption within the government. According to the Seventh Framework Programme of the European Commission, the promotion of integrity, accountability, and transparency by civil society organizations have made significant contributions to the decline of corruption.” [31]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Police corruption</span> Abuse of power by civil law enforcement

Police corruption is a form of police misconduct in which law enforcement officers end up breaking their political contract and abusing their power for personal gain. This type of corruption may involve one or a group of officers. Internal police corruption is a challenge to public trust, cohesion of departmental policies, human rights and legal violations involving serious consequences. Police corruption can take many forms, such as bribery.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Ghana</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Political corruption in Ghana has been common since independence. Since 2017, Ghana's score on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index has improved slightly from its low point that year, a score of 40 on a scale from 0 to 100. In the succeeding years, Ghana's score has either risen or remained steady: in the year 2022, Ghana scored 43. When ranked by score among the 180 countries in the 2022 Index, Ghana ranked 72nd, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison, the best score in 2022 was 90 and the worst score was 12.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Armenia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Armenia has decreased significantly in modern times, but remains an ongoing problem in the country. Despite this, fighting corruption following the 2018 Armenian revolution has recorded significant progress. Armenia is a member of the Council of Europe's Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) and the OECD's Anti-Corruption Network and Armenia's anti-corruption measures are regularly evaluated within their monitoring mechanisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Russia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption is perceived as a significant problem in Russia, impacting various aspects of life, including the economy, business, public administration, law enforcement, healthcare, and education. The phenomenon of corruption is strongly established in the historical model of public governance, and attributed to general weakness of rule of law in the country. Transparency International stated in 2022, "Corruption is endemic in Russia" and assigned it the lowest score of any European country in their Corruption Perceptions Index for 2021. It has, under the regime of Vladimir Putin, been variously characterized as a kleptocracy, an oligarchy, and a plutocracy; owing to its crony capitalism economic system.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime in Bulgaria</span>

Crime in Bulgaria is combated by the Bulgarian police and other agencies. The UK Government ranks Bulgaria as a low crime area and crime there has significantly decreased in recent years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Botswana</span> Institutional corruption in the country

The nation of Botswana has been ranked as one of the least corrupt countries in Africa by many large, well-known international organizations. However, corruption is not eradicated, and can still be seen in a wide majority of different governmental sectors and in differing forms. To combat this corruption, Botswana has passed many legal acts and policies with the aim of stopping its growth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Ukraine</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption is an issue in Ukrainian society going back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. Since declaring independence from the Soviet Union, Ukraine has faced a series of politicians from different sides of the political spectrum, as well as criminal bosses and oligarchs, who used the corruption of police, political parties, and industry to gain power.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Albania</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Albania is a very serious problem. According to Global Corruption Barometer 2013, 66% of respondents indicated that level of corruption has increased in Albania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Sweden</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Sweden has been defined as "the abuse of power" by Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå). By receiving bribes, bribe takers abuse their position of power, which is consistent with how the National Anti-Corruption Unit of the Swedish Prosecution Authority specifies the term. Although bribes and improper rewards are central in the definition of corruption in Sweden, corruption in the sense of "abuse of power" can also manifest itself in other crimes such as misuse of office, embezzlement, fraud and breach of trust against a principal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Luxembourg</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Levels of corruption in Luxembourg are generally said to be very low, and there a strong legal framework for combating corruption in the country. Surveys however indicate that a majority of the population believe political parties are either "corrupt" or "extremely corrupt."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Latvia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Latvia is examined on this page.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Portugal</span> Institutional corruption in the country

In 2013, a report by Transparency International revealed that political parties, Parliament, the judiciary and the military are the most corrupt institutions in Portugal. Transparency International's 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index ranks the country in 33rd place out of 180 countries in the Index.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Netherlands</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in the Netherlands in all major areas—judiciary, police, business, politics—as the country is considered one of the least corrupt within the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Czech Republic</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in the Czech Republic is considered to be widespread by a majority of the Czech public, according to Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Austria</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Austria has a well-developed institutional and legal system, and most corruption cases under investigation by a parliamentary committee end with judicial trials and effective judgments. However, there are several significant Austrian corruption cases which have taken place during the past decade involving land and regional officials, high-level public officials, the central government and, in one instance, the former Chancellor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Slovakia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Slovakia is a serious and ongoing problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Croatia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Croatia has severe problems with corruption, and among European Union member states, it is one of the top 5 most corrupt countries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Ecuador</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Ecuador is a serious problem. In 2014, the U.S. Department of State cited Ecuador's corruption as a key human-rights problem. According to Freedom House, "Ecuador has long been racked by corruption", and the weak judicial oversight and investigative resources perpetuate a culture of impunity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Bulgaria</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Bulgaria has decreased in recent years, after a series of reforms implemented through EU guidance. Among recent improvements, amendments to the constitution in 2015 brought about a reform of the Supreme Judicial Council and a stronger judicial inspectorate. Furthermore, the broader legislative framework has seen a number of reforms over the years, in particular through the amendments of the Judicial System Act in 2016 and of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Norway</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Norway ranks amongst the lowest in the world.

References

  1. ↑ "Extent of public corruption in Romania".
  2. ↑ "2015 Investment Climate Statement - Romania". The US Department of State. The US Department of State. Retrieved 17 August 2015.
  3. ↑ Direcția Națională Anticorupție
  4. ↑ "PROFILES: ROMANIA | ANTI-CORRUPTION AUTHORITIES". Archived from the original on 2016-04-24.
  5. ↑ "Meeting with Justice Minister Stelian Ion". 16 January 2021.
  6. 1 2 "EUR-Lex - 52022DC0500 - EN - EUR-Lex". eur-lex.europa.eu. Retrieved 30 March 2023.
  7. ↑ "Romania praised again in EU justice monitoring report but weaknesses remain". EURACTIV.com. 2017-01-26. Retrieved 2017-11-13.
  8. ↑ Andrew Gardner, Toby Vogel (11 July 2012). "Romanian power struggle alarms Europe's leaders". European Voice.
  9. ↑ Sam Cage, Luiza Ilie (22 November 2012). "Populism takes spotlight in Romania power struggle". Reuters.
  10. ↑ "EU Commission chides Romania over state corruption". BBC News. 18 July 2012.
  11. ↑ Raluca Besliu (18 January 2014). "Legally corrupt: Romanian politicians chase 'super-immunity'". Aljazeera.
  12. ↑ "Transparency International Romania statement on recent immunity decision by Chamber of Deputies". Transparency International. 12 December 2013.
  13. ↑ Valentina Pop (11 December 2013). "Romanian MPs decriminalise political corruption". EUobserver.
  14. ↑ Luiza Ilie (22 January 2013). "Romania parliament boosts criminal immunity, may irk EU". Reuters.
  15. ↑ Wendy Zeldin (23 January 2014). "Romania: Court Finds Immunity Law Unconstitutional". Library of Congress.
  16. 1 2 "Romania anti-sleaze drive reaches elite". BBC News. 19 February 2015.
  17. 1 2 3 "Romania".
  18. ↑ "The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption Perceptions Index is calculated". Transparency.org. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  19. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2022: Romania". Transparency.org. Retrieved 5 February 2023.
  20. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2020: Romania". Transparency.org. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  21. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2019: Romania". Transparency.org. Retrieved 3 December 2022.
  22. ↑ "EU Anti-Corruption Report" (PDF). Retrieved 30 March 2023.
  23. 1 2 3 "Raport de activitate 2015". National Anticorruption Directorate. Retrieved 25 January 2017.
  24. ↑ "Raport de activitate 2016". National Anticorruption Directorate. Retrieved 3 May 2017.
  25. 1 2 "Raport de activitate 2017". National Anticorruption Directorate. Retrieved 4 March 2018.
  26. ↑ "Romanians protest government plan to commute sentences". POLITICO. 2017-01-22. Retrieved 2018-03-17.
  27. ↑ "Nucleara din justitie. Lista potentialilor beneficiari ai dezincriminarii mascate a abuzului in serviciu". HotNewsRo (in Romanian). Retrieved 2018-03-17.
  28. ↑ "FOTO VIDEO Cel mai amplu protest din ultimii 25 de ani. Peste 300.000 de oameni au fost în stradă". www.digi24.ro (in Romanian). Retrieved 2018-03-17.
  29. ↑ "Romanian government under pressure as 500,000 protest". www.aljazeera.com. Retrieved 2018-03-17.
  30. ↑ Cosmin Stan; Kara Fox. "Romanian Justice Minister resigns". CNN. Retrieved 2018-03-17.
  31. ↑ "evidence Project Deliverable 7 | SIOR. Social Impact Open Repository". sior.ub.edu. Retrieved 2018-04-18.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.