Corruption in Tunisia

Last updated

Corruption in Tunisia is widely regarded amongst Tunisians to be in the top five issues facing the country today. Since the end of colonial rule, Tunisia has been marked by corrupt and authoritarian leaders. After the revolution of 2011 came numerous committees to tackle this issue. The Investigative Committee for Acts of Corruption and Bribery Committed Under the Former President was one such committee, however it failed to deal with the more widespread issues of corruption. State-owned companies and companies owned by influential families continue to enjoy a privileged position, while those at the bottom struggle with everyday necessities.

Contents

History of Corruption

Since the end of colonial rule, Tunisia had only two presidents until 2011. [1] This early period of independence was marked by widespread corruption of the authoritarian rulers. The last leader before the revolution, Ben Ali, his family members, and his inner circle, all held considerably power over industries within the state. One of the primary goals of the Tunisian people and government in the past decade has been to address and rectify the consequences of past corruption, and create legislative bodies and policies to limit corruption going forward. [2] [1]

Corruption in the modern age

It is estimated that Tunisia lost more than US$1 billion per year between 2000 and 2008 due to corruption, bribery, kickbacks, trade mispricing and criminal activities. [3]

The National Constituent Assembly developed an anti-corruption initiative in December 2012 which aims to establish a national integrity system, to promote the independent National Anti-Corruption Authority, and to boost civil society participation in corruption prevention. However, the government's effort is still considered limited. Corruption is still a serious problem yet it is less pervasive when compared to the neighboring countries. [4]

The role of middlemen is very important for doing business in Tunisia, and many investors consider that having the right connections when collaborating on business in order to overcome administrative hurdles to investment and public procurement is crucial. State-owned companies or private groups owned by influential families continue to enjoy a privileged position, with close political and administrative ties and easier access to financing. [5]

The new government of Tunisia has made efforts to deal with the legacy of corruption from past regimes. After the revolution of 2011 came the formation of numerous committees within the government. The Investigative Committee for Acts of Corruption and Bribery Committed Under the Former President was one such committee, determining the extent of corruption within numerous sectors of public and private institutions. This committee's performance left many Tunisians dissatisfied. Of the numerous reports that were filed by citizens, only a small minority of them were dealt with, many of which focused on the president and his circle. [2]

While corruption in Tunisia is widely regarded as pervasive, actions are being taken by the government in order to overcome this. Article 11 of the Tunisian constitution states that public officials are required to publicize their financial earnings. However, only 12% of the Tunisian parliament has done so. [1] Article 32 of the constitution allows citizens to freely request information, and in 2016 a government department was created to facilitate this. This policy was not implemented perfectly, as Prime Minister Chahed stated civil servants must request permission from superiors before publicly discussing this information. [1] The government has however passed an order for the protection of whistleblowers, allowing for increased transparency within the state.

The government's efforts to reduce corruption have seen limited success. One of the steps taken by the government was the arrest of several high-profile individuals within Tunisia. However, these arrests have left many concerned with the prisoner’s treatment, and human rights violations are speculated to be occurring. [1] The population of Tunisia has had mixed feelings over the extent and severity of corruption; although Tunisia has moved towards a more democratic government, this has made corruption more widespread, though less intense. What was once a small circle, centered around the autocratic President Ben Ali, has transformed into several smaller circles of corruption within the parliament, police, and many other government bodies. [1] On March 20 of 2015, President Caid proposed a law that would limit the authority of the Truth and Dignity Body to address financial issue, and allow anonymity to those accused. The bill proved wildly unpopular, and due to pressure from social groups, The National Council of the Bar Association asked for it to be overturned. Many Tunisians have pointed out that the bill would grant amnesty to public employees and set a dangerous precedent of undermining the justice system. [6]

Public Ranking and Polling

On Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, Tunisia scored 40 on a scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean"). When ranked by score, Tunisia ranked 87th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. [7] For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90 (ranked 1), the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11 (ranked 180). [8] For comparison with regional scores, the average score among Middle Eastern and North African countries [Note 1] was 34. The highest score among Middle Eastern and North African countries was 68 and the lowest score was 13. [9]

Corruption in Tunisia is often discussed in public and political circles of the region as being of the most prominent issues effecting the country today. In a series of polls conducted by the International Republican Institute, corruption consistently ranked highly among the issues facing Tunisia. 83% of those surveyed were disappointed with the progress of the country, with 26% of respondents stating they were unable to afford food and other necessities. 89% felt the economic situation was negative. [10]

When asked what the largest issue of Tunisia was, corruption was among the top 5 results, even being present at the local level. Respondents were asked what issues were prominent within their own communities, and corruption of the government came up once again. [10]

Addressing the steps needed to be taken by the government, many of those surveyed picked issues involving the economy and unemployment, as well as living standards. After this, the next highest result showed corruption and transparency, only ranking slightly lower. While corruption was not the most prominent issue according to those surveyed, it still was important. When questioned how the government of Tunisia should address these issues of unemployment and low standards of living, the number one answer given was reducing corruption in order to adequately fund government programs addressing these problems. [10]

Notes

  1. ↑ Algeria, Bahrain, Comoros, Djibouti, Egypt, Iran, Iraq, Israel, Jordan, Kuwait, Lebanon, Libya, Mauritania, Morocco, Oman, Qatar, Saudi Arabia, Sudan, Syria, Tunisia, United Arab Emirates, and Yemen

See also

Related Research Articles

Transparency International e.V. (TI) is a German registered association founded in 1993 by former employees of the World Bank. Based in Berlin, its nonprofit and non-governmental purpose is to take action to combat global corruption with civil societal anti-corruption measures and to prevent criminal activities arising from corruption. Its most notable publications include the Global Corruption Barometer and the Corruption Perceptions Index. Transparency International serves as an umbrella organization. From 1993 to today, its membership has grown from a few individuals to more than 100 national chapters, which engage in fighting perceived corruption in their home countries. TI is a member of G20 Think Tanks, UNESCO Consultative Status, United Nations Global Compact, Sustainable Development Solutions Network and shares the goals of peace, justice, strong institutions and partnerships of the United Nations Sustainable Development Group (UNSDG). TI is a social partner of Global Alliance in Management Education. TI confirmed the dis-accreditation of the national chapter of United States of America in 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption Perceptions Index</span> Country ranking by public sector corruption

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is an index that scores and ranks countries by their perceived levels of public sector corruption, as assessed by experts and business executives. The CPI generally defines corruption as an "abuse of entrusted power for private gain". The index is published annually by the non-governmental organisation Transparency International since 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Armenia</span>

Corruption in Armenia has decreased significantly in modern times, but remains an ongoing problem in the country. Despite this, fighting corruption following the 2018 Armenian revolution has recorded significant progress. Armenia is a member of the Council of Europe's Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) and the OECD's Anti-Corruption Network and Armenia's anti-corruption measures are regularly evaluated within their monitoring mechanisms.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the United States</span>

Corruption in the United States is the act of government officials abusing their political powers for private gain, typically through bribery or other methods, in the United States government. Corruption in the United States has been a perennial political issue, peaking in the Jacksonian era and the Gilded Age before declining with the reforms of the Progressive Era.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Philippines</span>

The Philippines suffers from widespread corruption, which developed during the Spanish colonial period. According to GAN Integrity's Philippines Corruption Report updated May 2020, the Philippines suffers from many incidents of corruption and crime in many aspects of civic life and in various sectors. Such corruption risks are rampant throughout the state's judicial system, police service, public services, land administration, and natural resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Bahrain</span>

Bahrain became a party with United Nations Convention against Corruption in 2010 after signing it in 2005.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Albania</span>

Corruption in Albania is a very serious problem. According to Global Corruption Barometer 2013, 66% of respondents indicated that level of corruption has increased in Albania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Mexico</span>

Corruption in Mexico has permeated several segments of society – political, economic, and social – and has greatly affected the country's legitimacy, transparency, accountability, and effectiveness. Many of these dimensions have evolved as a product of Mexico's legacy of elite, oligarchic consolidation of power and authoritarian rule.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Turkey</span>

Corruption in Turkey is an issue affecting the accession of Turkey to the European Union. Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index scores 180 countries according to their perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 to 100. Since the current scale was introduced in 2012, Turkey's score has fallen from its highest score of 50 (2013) to its lowest, current score of 34 (2023). When the 180 countries in the Index were ranked by their score, Turkey ranked 115 in 2023. For comparison with worldwide scores, the average score was 43, the best score was 90, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Eastern European and Central Asian countries was 53, the average score was 35 and the lowest score was 18.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Egypt</span>

Corruption laws exist in Egypt to criminalize extortion, embezzlement and bribery in business, but they are poorly enforced.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Australia</span>

Corruption can take many forms, and can distort how public policy is made or implemented. This article discusses the responsibilities of the various agencies involved in combating corruption in Australia. Australia became a signatory to the United Nations Convention against Corruption in 2005. While Australia is a wealthy democracy, over the decade since 2012, Australia's ranking in the Corruption Perceptions Index from Transparency International has slipped from 7th place in 2012 to 14th in 2023, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. Additionally, there is a public perception that corruption in Australia is increasing. All states have broad-based anti-corruption agencies, and a national anti-corruption commission has been operational since July 2023.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Romania</span>

Corruption in Romania has decreased in recent years. In particular since 2014, Romania undertook a significant anti-corruption effort that included the investigation and prosecution of medium- and high-level political, judicial and administrative officials by the National Anticorruption Directorate. The National Anticorruption Directorate was established in 2002 by the Romanian government to investigate and prosecute medium and high-level corruption related offenses, using a model of organization inspired by similar structures in Norway, Belgium and Spain. Adrian Zuckerman, the US Ambassador in Romania, has stated in 2021 that "the rule of law has been strengthened in Romania". Since 2022, the effectiveness of the investigation and sanctioning of high-level corruption further improved, including by advancing on cases that had been pending for years for procedural reasons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Portugal</span>

In 2013, a report by Transparency International revealed that political parties, Parliament, the judiciary and the military are the most corrupt institutions in Portugal. Transparency International's 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index ranks the country in 33rd place out of 180 countries in the Index.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Morocco</span>

Petty and grand corruption is a growing problem within Morocco. A leaked report by a US diplomat stated in 2009 that corruption had become much more institutionalized under King Mohammed VI, and that the royal family had been using public institutions to coerce and solicit bribes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Georgia</span>

Corruption in Georgia had been an issue in the post-Soviet decades. Before the 2003 Rose Revolution, according to Foreign Policy, Georgia was among the most corrupt nations in Eurasia. The level of corruption abated dramatically, however, after the revolution. In 2010, Transparency International (TI) said that Georgia was "the best corruption-buster in the world." While low-level corruption had earlier been largely eliminated, Transparency International Georgia since 2020 has also documented dozens of cases of high-level corruption that remain to be prosecuted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Jordan</span>

Corruption in Jordan is a social and economic issue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Uzbekistan</span>

Corruption in Uzbekistan is a serious problem. There are laws in place to prevent corruption, but enforcement in terms of laws regarding corruption is very weak. Low prosecution rates of corrupt officials is another contributing factor to the rampant corruption in Uzbekistan. It is not a criminal offense for a non-public official to influence the discretion of a public official. The judicial system faces severe functional deficits due to limited resources and corruption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Tajikistan</span>

Corruption in Tajikistan is a widespread phenomenon that is found in all spheres of Tajik society. The situation is essentially similar to that in the other former Soviet republics of Central Asia. Reliable specifics about corruption can be difficult to come by, however, as can hard information about the effectiveness of supposed anti-corruption initiatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Eritrea</span>

Corruption in Eritrea is considered a deeply serious and growing problem. The level of corruption used to be considerably lower in Eritrea than in many other African countries. Indeed, it was traditionally viewed as having a "strong 'anti-corruption' culture" and considered relatively "egalitarian and corruption-free." In 2006, a report by Bertelsmann Stiftung stated that corruption, as of that date, was not a serious problem within Eritrea. While noting that there had been "cases of corruption since independence," they existed on a negligible level, although politically-motivated corruption allegations have been made. But, in fact, corruption is said to have been growing steadily worse ever since 1998, when, not long after the end of its decades-long war of independence, a border conflict with Ethiopia led to another war.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the United Kingdom</span>

Transparency International defines corruption as "the abuse of entrusted power for private gain". Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored the United Kingdom at 71 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, the United Kingdom ranked 20th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Western European and European Union countries was 90, the average score was 65 and the lowest score was 42. The United Kingdom's score has fallen six points over the last five years and is now at its lowest point in the twelve years that the current version of the Index has been published.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 Lee-Jones, Krista; Hattar, Kinda (2018). "Country profile: Tunisia: Overview of corruption and anti-corruption". Transparency International.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  2. 1 2 Nouioua, Adnen (2020). "Fighting Corruption within the Framework of Transitional Justice: The Impact on Democratic Transition in Tunisia". AlMuntaqa. 3 (1): 9–22. doi:10.31430/almuntaqa.3.1.0009. ISSN   2616-8073. JSTOR   10.31430/almuntaqa.3.1.0009. S2CID   226467722.
  3. ↑ "Corruption, Tax Evasion, Criminal Activity Cost Tunisia US$1.16 Billion Per Year From 2000-2008". Global Financial Integrity. Archived from the original on 22 February 2014. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
  4. ↑ "Transformation Index 2012-Tunisia". The Bertelsmann Foundation 2012. Archived from the original on 7 February 2014. Retrieved 7 February 2014.
  5. ↑ "Tunisia Corruption Profile". Business Anti-Corruption Portal. Archived from the original on 14 July 2015. Retrieved 14 July 2015.
  6. ↑ Yerkes, Sarah; Muasher, Marwan (2017). "TUNISIA'S CORRUPTION CONTAGION: A Transition at Risk". Carnegie Endowment for International Peace.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  7. ↑ "The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption Perceptions Index is calculated". Transparency.org. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  8. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2023: Tunisia". Transparency.org. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  9. ↑ "CPI 2023 for Middle East & North Africa: Dysfunctional approach to fighting corruption undermines progress". Transparency.org. Retrieved 11 March 2024.
  10. 1 2 3 "Tunisia Poll: Underperforming Economy and Corruption Continue to Drive Intense Dissatisfaction". International Republican Institute. Retrieved 2023-04-07.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.