Corruption in Australia

Last updated

Corruption can take many forms, and can distort how public policy is made or implemented. This article discusses the responsibilities of the various agencies involved in combating corruption in Australia. Australia became a signatory to the United Nations Convention against Corruption in 2005. [1] While Australia is a wealthy democracy, over the decade since 2012, Australia's ranking in the Corruption Perceptions Index from Transparency International has slipped from 7th place in 2012 to 14th in 2023, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. Additionally, there is a public perception that corruption in Australia is increasing. All states have broad-based anti-corruption agencies, and a national anti-corruption commission has been operational since July 2023. [2]

Contents

Protections for whistleblowers are weak[ according to whom? ] in Australia, [3] although greater protections have been pledged by the incumbent Albanese government. [4]

Federal level

By state or territory

New South Wales

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (ICAC) was established in 1989 to improve the integrity of the public service. ICAC is an independent body that is non-political, and that does not have a government minister in charge of its operations. The ICAC holds a large amount of investigative powers including listening devices and telephone interception. [5]

Queensland

The Crime and Corruption Commission (CCC) is an independent statutory body that investigates and aims to reduce the amount of corruption across the public sector. It also investigates other serious crimes including money laundering, fraud and homicide. Its powers include the ability to call witnesses to hearings, and require individuals to produce evidence. [6] The CCC can give recommendations to courts, but cannot charge individuals with corruptions or crimes. It was established on 1 January 2002.

Tasmania

The Integrity Commission is an independent statutory body which was established in 2010. It was created to ensure integrity in the public service and reduce corruption within Tasmania. Reports have found the Tasmanian Integrity Commission to have major flaws in its design due to none of its investigations using their full powers in an investigation. [7]

Victoria

The Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission (IBAC) is the key body that investigates corruption within Victoria. It was established in July 2012. The commission is designed to investigate corruption in the public service such as councils, parliament, the judiciary and other government bodies. The Victorian Independent Broad-based Anti-corruption Commission has a large range of powers similar to the NSW Independent Commission Against Corruption such as interception of telecommunication devices and asking people to produce evidence or to speak at hearings. [8]

Northern Territory

The Independent Commissioner Against Corruption (Northern Territory) was established in 2018.

Western Australia

The Corruption and Crime Commission was established in Western Australia in 2004.

South Australia

The Independent Commission Against Corruption (South Australia) was established in 2013.

Convicted Australian politicians

Public-private corruption

Public-private partnership corruption [9] or privatisation leading to inherent monopoly within public sector could raise to levels of corruption when it is abused. See example:

- PwC tax scandal

Rankings and research

Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index scores countries according to the perceived corruption of the public sector on a scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean") and then ranks those countries by their scorethe country with the highest score is ranked first and is perceived to have the most honest public sector. [10] The 2012 Index gave Australia a score of 85/100, which ranked it in 7th place out of 176 countries, [11] although a corruption law expert warned that the Index gave an incomplete picture because it ignored corrupt dealings between Australia and foreign countries. [12]

The perception of corruption in the Australian public sector has been increasing since 2012. In the 2015 Index Australia ranked 13th, dropping six positions since 2012. [13] [14] Transparency International described Australia's score of 77 in the 2020 Index as a 'significant decliner', having fallen eight points since 2012, [15] and called Australia's score of 73 in the 2021 Index 'one of the world’s most significant decliners, having dropped 12 points since 2012 to hit a record low this year. Its deteriorating score indicates systemic failings in tackling public sector corruption.' [16]

The phenomenon has also been studied by the Australian National University, which produced a report called Perceptions of Corruption and Ethical Conduct (2012), which concluded: 'there is a widespread perception that corruption in Australia has increased' and that 'the media, trade unions and political parties were seen as Australia's most corrupt institutions'. [17]

Research published in 2015 by Chartered Accountants Australia and New Zealand found government and private firms in Australia and nearby New Zealand both display widespread 'complacent' attitudes about corruption, particularly in regards to companies bidding for government contracts. [18]

In January 2018, a discussion paper published by the Australia Institute, suggested that the trust in the Australian government is at a historical low, which could have reduced the GDP by as much as 4% or $72.3 billion. [14]

A report by Australian Public Service Commission's released in 2018, stated that investigations were conducted in only 0.3% of the workforce, meaning a total of 596 employees. [19]

International comparison

Australia's score of 75 in the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index remains well above the global average score of 43 and ranks the country at 14th of the 180 countries in that year's Index. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90 (ranked 1), the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11 (ranked 180). [20] For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among the countries of the Asia Pacific region [Note 1] was that of New Zealand, Australia's nearest neighbour. New Zealand scored 85 and was ranked 3rd in the 2023 Index. [21] The average score in the Asia Pacific region was 45 and the lowest score was 17. [22]

Some of Australia's smaller neighbours are making steps towards establishing Independent Commissions Against Corruption, with Papua New Guinea recently voting unanimously to set up an Independent Commission Against Corruption. [23] Another small neighbour, the Solomon Islands recently appointed its first director general for its Independent Commission against Corruption. [24]

Partnerships

Australia is part of G20 Anti-Corruption Working Group, APEC Anti-Corruption and Transparency Working Group and the United Nations Convention against Corruption Working Groups. [25]

Notes

  1. Afghanistan, Australia, Bangladesh, Bhutan, Cambodia, China, Fiji, Hong Kong, India, Indonesia, Japan, Laos, Malaysia, Maldives, Mongolia, Myanmar, Nepal, New Zealand, North Korea, Pakistan, Papua New Guinea, Philippines, Singapore, Solomon Islands, South Korea, Sri Lanka, Taiwan, Thailand, Timor-Leste, Vanuatu, and Vietnam

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Independent Commission Against Corruption (Hong Kong)</span> Anti-corruption agency in Hong Kong

The Independent Commission Against Corruption is the statutory independent anti-corruption body of Hong Kong with the primary objective of combating corruption in both the public and private sectors. Established in 1974 and operating independently from the Hong Kong government and law enforcement agencies, the ICAC is headed by the Commissioner, who reports directly to the Chief Executive of Hong Kong. The ICAC has played a crucial role in maintaining Hong Kong's reputation as one of the least corrupt places globally and fostering a culture of integrity within the city.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Philippines</span>

The Philippines suffers from widespread corruption, which developed during the Spanish colonial period. According to GAN Integrity's Philippines Corruption Report updated May 2020, the Philippines suffers from many incidents of corruption and crime in many aspects of civic life and in various sectors. Such corruption risks are rampant throughout the state's judicial system, police service, public services, land administration, and natural resources.The 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored the Philippines at 34. When ranked by score, the Philippines ranked 115th among the 180 countries in the 2023 Index. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the worst score was 11, and the average score was 43.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in New Zealand</span>

This article discusses the responsibilities of the various agencies involved in combating corruption in New Zealand. New Zealand is regarded as having one of the lowest levels of corruption in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Indonesia</span>

While hard data on corruption is difficult to collect, corruption in Indonesia is clearly seen through public opinion, collated through surveys as well as observation of how each system runs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Papua New Guinea</span>

Corruption is rife in Papua New Guinea (PNG). According to The Economist, "PNG's governments are notorious for corruption, and ever run the risk of turning the state into a fully-fledged kleptocracy".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Zimbabwe</span>

Corruption in Zimbabwe has become endemic within its political, private and civil sectors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in France</span>

Corruption in France describes the prevention and occurrence of corruption in France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Bangladesh</span>

Corruption in Bangladesh has been a continuing problem. According to all major ranking institutions, Bangladesh routinely finds itself among the most corrupt countries in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Romania</span>

Corruption in Romania has decreased in recent years. In particular since 2014, Romania undertook a significant anti-corruption effort that included the investigation and prosecution of medium- and high-level political, judicial and administrative officials by the National Anticorruption Directorate. The National Anticorruption Directorate was established in 2002 by the Romanian government to investigate and prosecute medium and high-level corruption related offenses, using a model of organization inspired by similar structures in Norway, Belgium and Spain. Adrian Zuckerman, the US Ambassador in Romania, has stated in 2021 that "the rule of law has been strengthened in Romania". Since 2022, the effectiveness of the investigation and sanctioning of high-level corruption further improved, including by advancing on cases that had been pending for years for procedural reasons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Belgium</span>

In general, Belgium has a well-developed legal and institutional framework for fighting against corruption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Denmark</span>

Corruption in Denmark is amongst the lowest in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Germany</span>

Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored Germany at 78 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Germany ranked 9th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Western European and European Union countries was 90, the average score was 65 and the lowest score was 42.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Netherlands</span>

Corruption in the Netherlands is minimal in all major areas—judiciary, police, business, politics—as the country is considered one of the least corrupt within the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Czech Republic</span>

Corruption in the Czech Republic is considered to be widespread by a majority of the Czech public, according to Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Montenegro</span>

In recent years, Montenegro has increased its efforts to implement preventive and legislative measures needed to curb corruption. For example, anti-bribery provisions in the Criminal Code, as well as laws on money laundering, conflict of interest, access to information, and political funding have all been strengthened, while awareness-raising activities and training of public officials in integrity standards have been intensified.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Slovenia</span>

Corruption in Slovenia is examined on this page.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Slovakia</span>

Corruption in Slovakia is a serious and ongoing problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Iraq</span>

Corruption is pervasive at all levels of government in Iraq. In 2021, President Barham Salih stated that US$150 billion of oil money had been stolen and smuggled out of Iraq in corrupt deals since the 2003 U.S. invasion. Endemic corruption pervades Iraq's oil and gas sectors, which still accounts for more than 99 percent of the country's exports and 85 percent of the government's budget. The Iraqi economy is predominantly a cash economy, making it almost impossible to trace the amount or the path the money follows.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Serbia</span>

Corruption levels are perceived to be high by surveyed residents of Serbia, and public trust in key institutions remains low.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Nepal</span>

Corruption in Nepal is widespread and extends to every sector from the government to the judiciary, police, health services, and education.

References

  1. Kunc, Francois (November 2022). "Introduction and a note to contributors". Australian Law Journal . 96 (11): 782. doi:10.3316/agispt.20221124078366 (inactive 1 November 2024).{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: DOI inactive as of November 2024 (link)
  2. "Information about the National Anti-Corruption Commission". Australian Commission for Law Enforcement Integrity . Australian Government. Archived from the original on 30 January 2023. Retrieved 30 January 2023.
  3. "Government urged to drop prosecutions against Richard Boyle, David McBride and Bernard Collaery". ABC News. 13 June 2022.
  4. Pelly, Michael (16 November 2022). "Whistleblower laws to be introduced within next fortnight". Australian Financial Review . Retrieved 17 November 2022.
  5. Gorta, Angela (June 2003). "The NSW independent commission against corruption's experience in minimising corruption". Asian Journal of Political Science. 11 (1): 1–21. doi:10.1080/02185370308434216. ISSN   0218-5377. S2CID   154571310.
  6. "Our powers". www.ccc.qld.gov.au. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
  7. Aulby, Hannah (2018). Tasmania's toothless watchdog: A comparison of the Tasmanian and NSW anti-corruption watchdogs (PDF). Canberra, Australia: Australia Institute.
  8. "About us". IBAC. Retrieved 17 May 2021.
  9. "Corruption in Public Private Partnerships" (PDF).
  10. "The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption Perceptions Index is calculated". Transparency.org. 20 December 2021. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
  11. "2012 Corruption Perceptions Index: Australia". Transparency.org. 6 December 2012. Retrieved 18 July 2023.
  12. Jennings, Andrew (13 December 2012). "Ranking doesn't change foreign bribery facts". Lawyers Weekly. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
  13. "Australia continues slide down International Corruption Index, perceived as 'more corrupt'". ABC News. 27 January 2016. Retrieved 27 January 2016.
  14. 1 2 Aulby, Hannah (January 2018). "The cost of corruption" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on 11 January 2018. Retrieved 2 February 2018.
  15. "CPI 2020: Asia Pacific - News". Transparency.org. 28 January 2021. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  16. "9 countries to watch on the 2021 Corruption Perceptions Index". Transparency.org. Retrieved 11 July 2022.
  17. Creagh, Sunanda (5 November 2012). "Media, unions and political parties seen as Australia's most corrupt institutions". The Conversation. Retrieved 9 November 2013.
  18. "Australian firms too 'complacent' about corruption". ABC News. 17 September 2015. Retrieved 28 October 2021.
  19. Commission, Australian Public Service (8 January 2018). "APS Values and the Code of Conduct · State of the Service". State of the Service. Retrieved 28 February 2018.
  20. "Corruption Perceptions Index 2023 for Australia". Transparency.org. 30 January 2024. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
  21. "Corruption Perceptions Index 2023 for New Zealand". Transparency.org. 30 January 2024. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
  22. "CPI 2023 for Asia Pacific: Regional stagnation marked by inadequate delivery of anti-corruption commitments". Transparency.org. 30 January 2024. Retrieved 11 February 2024.
  23. "PNG: Anti-corruption body welcomes passing of ICAC bill". ABC Radio Australia. 13 November 2020. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  24. "Anti-corruption Body Appoints Director General - Solomon Times Online". SolomonTimes.com. Retrieved 14 January 2022.
  25. "Attorney-General's Department >> Crime and corruption >> Anti-corruption". Archived from the original on 7 September 2015. Retrieved 9 September 2015.