Corruption in Japan

Last updated

Corruption in Japan remains a serious concern for the country. Japan has seen significant cases of corruption scandals throughout its history. Cases of corruption have been classified into three: bad-apple corruption, standard-operating-procedure corruption, and systemic corruption. [1] Corrupt practices include bribery, political donations, and those involving the amakudari, among others. There were also high-profile incidents of corporate malfeasance.

Contents

Through the years, the Japanese government has taken steps to address corruption through reforms and statutes. Transparency International’s Corruption Perceptions Index for 2023 ranked Japan in the 16th position with a score of 73, a ranking it has maintained since 2021. [2] The Corruption Perceptions Index scores the public sector of 180 countries on a scale from scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean"). The country with the highest score is ranked first. [3]

History

There were documented corruption cases during the Meiji Restoration period in the late 19th and 20th centuries. Japan, in this period, had been undergoing rapid industrialization. This entailed the emergence of Japanese conglomerates called zaibatsu , or the Japanese cliques. [4] [5] The growth of these companies was encouraged by the government in a bid to drive economic development. Close relationships between zaibatsu leaders and government officials became the norm and this resulted in a culture of corruption. This led to the heavy influence of the zaibatsu's interests on policy decisions and regulatory frameworks. [6]

The first major corruption scandal in Japan was the Nitto case, which transpired in 1909. Representatives of the Nitto company bribed politicians in order to influence legislation covering the sugar industry. [7] This resulted in the successful passage of laws involving tax on sugar products. The company then wanted to establish a national sugar company. When this failed, Nitto fielded its own candidates during the parliamentary election. After its bribery and corrupt practices were revealed, Nitto’s executives and members of the parliament were investigated and prosecuted. [7] Prosecutors took the lead in the investigation instead of the police, also a first in Japan.

One of the most notable corruption cases during the 1920s was the Mitsui zaibatsu scandal. It was widely known that this conglomerate offered financial assistance to party politicians as well as government regulators in exchange for favorable treatment. [8] Accounts indicate that Mitsui’s bribery practices extended well into the 1930s. This is demonstrated in the case of Ariga Nagabumi, Mitsui’s managing director. He was recorded to have contributed to the representatives of the Cherry Blossom Society and had continued to make bribery payments to politicians such as Kita Ikki. [9] Ikeda Seihin, his successor, would continue this practice, bribing not only political figures but also army officers. [9]

One of the biggest corruption scandals in modern Japan involved Lockheed Martin in 1976. Previously, in a move to secure overseas aircraft contracts, the American company had set aside $25 million for bribery. [10] During a Senate investigation in the U.S., it was revealed that several Japanese officials received payoffs and these included Kodama Yoshio. It was reported that he was given $7 million to curry favor and secure favorable deals, which included the All-Nippon Airways’ purchase of the Lockheed Tri-Star jets. [10]

Amakudari

Amakudari is a Japanese patronage system that emerged during World War II when the government started to regulate the economy to support its war efforts. Companies started employing bureaucrats to anticipate future government policies and also to lobby for their business interests. [11] This practice involves former high-level bureaucrats migrating to high-profile positions in both private and public sectors. There are cases when companies would promise positions to public officials in exchange for favors. The system has been associated with corruption since these individuals – through their government position, influence, and networks – can facilitate bid-rigging, inspection avoidance, and the circumvention of traditional expectations of transparency and fair play. [12] [13]

Amakudari persists today. A report by the Japan Times in 2011, for example, cited that 68 former government officials have found senior employment positions in the country’s 12 electricity suppliers via amakudari in the past 50 years. [13]

The following are some examples of corruption cases involving amakudari:

Contemporary Cases

Corruption in Japan is not only confined to cases implicating government officials. There were also instances of corporate malfeasance such as the Olympus Corporation’s accounting fraud in 2011, which was perpetrated to hide losses amounting to $1.7 billion. [17] The misconduct, which was perpetrated by top executives, was revealed by the company’s CEO Michael Woodford. [18] The company also admitted that it hid losses for over two decades. [18]

In 2023, four ministers of Prime Minister Fumio Kishida’s cabinet resigned after a scandal erupted involving the Liberal Democratic Party (LDP). Several LDP politicians particularly those who belong to the so-called Abe faction (named after former prime minister Shinzo Abe), were accused of pocketing excess funds received at fundraisers and funneling the money into slush funds. [19] Investigators raided its office and of one other faction, the Nikkai group. [19] Authorities also investigated four other factions within LDP including the incumbent Prime Minister’s faction.

Anti-corruption measures and reforms

In response to corruption challenges, Japan has instituted anti-corruption measures that include legal reforms, corporate responsibility, and collaborative initiatives. The current system features an approach that focuses on prevention and transparency.

Before World War II, anti-corruption measures were led by prosecutors, who enjoyed strong public support. To ensure their independence, the power to appoint the Prosecutor General was transferred from the Cabinet to the Emperor. [7] By 1947, a special division was established to investigate misappropriation cases within the Tokyo District Prosecutors’ Office. This later became the Special Investigation Department, which became in charge of economic crimes, tax evasion, and corruption cases. [7]

The modern legal framework that addresses corruption in Japan is composed of the Unfair Competition Prevention Act (UCPA) and Japan’s Penal Code. The former outlines the prohibition covering corruption and bribery while the latter provides the penalty for violations committed by public officials. Japan also established mechanisms for transparency and whistleblower protection. [20]

The emphasis on prevention and transparency can be demonstrated in the anti-corruption approach of Japan’s Official Development Assistance (ODA) agency. It has a Consultation Desk on Anti-Corruption, which addresses fraud and corruption involving Japan’s ODA initiatives. Violators of the ODA’s measures face exclusion from ODA’s projects. [21]

Japan had also amended and strengthened its anti-bid-rigging laws after the scandals during the 2000s. Reports showed that, by 2009, these reforms were effective and had led to a substantial decline in noncompetitive bidding. [22]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau</span> Independent agency of the government of Singapore

The Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau (CPIB) is an independent agency of the Government of Singapore responsible for the investigation and prosecution of any possible serious or complex fraud and corruption in Singapore. The CPIB has the mandate to investigate into any acts or forms of corruption in the public and private sectors in Singapore, and in the course of doing so, any other offences under any written law, with the powers of arrest.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Kenya</span>

Corruption in the government of Kenya has a history which spans the era of the founding president Jomo Kenyatta, to Daniel arap Moi's KANU, Mwai Kibaki's PNU governments. President Uhuru Kenyatta's Jubilee Party government, and the current William Ruto's Kenya Kwanza administration has also been riddled with massive cases of graft, topping in the list of corrupt presitents in Africa

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Ghana</span>

Political corruption in Ghana has been common since independence. Since 2017, Ghana's score on Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index has improved slightly from its low point that year, a score of 40 on a scale from 0 to 100. Ghana's score rose to 43 by 2020 and has remained there until the present, 2023. When ranked by score among the 180 countries in the 2023 Index, Ghana ranked 70th, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the average score among sub-Saharan African countries was 33. The highest score in sub-Saharan Africa was 71 and the lowest score was 11.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in South Africa</span>

Corruption in South Africa includes the improper use of public resources for private ends, including bribery and improper favouritism. Corruption was at its highest during the period of state capture under the presidency of Jacob Zuma and has remained widespread, negatively "affecting criminal justice, service provision, economic opportunity, social cohesion and political integrity" in South Africa.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Pakistan</span>

Corruption in Pakistan involves fraudulent practices carried out by officials and institutions. This can include a number of corruption practices, from petty bribery to high-profile scandals.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in New Zealand</span>

This article discusses the responsibilities of the various agencies involved in combating corruption in New Zealand. New Zealand is regarded as having one of the lowest levels of corruption in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Indonesia</span>

While hard data on corruption is difficult to collect, corruption in Indonesia is clearly seen through public opinion, collated through surveys as well as observation of how each system runs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Papua New Guinea</span>

Corruption is rife in Papua New Guinea (PNG). According to The Economist, "PNG's governments are notorious for corruption, and ever run the risk of turning the state into a fully-fledged kleptocracy".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Italy</span>

Corruption in Italy is a major problem. In Transparency International's annual surveys, Italy has consistently been regarded as one of the most corrupt countries in the Eurozone. Political corruption remains a major problem particularly in Lombardy, Campania and Sicily where corruption perception is at a high level. Political parties are ranked the most corrupt institution in Italy, closely followed by public officials and Parliament, according to Transparency International. But in the 2013 Global Corruption Barometer report, Italy is in 17th position in front of the United Kingdom (18th), Switzerland (21st) and the United States (22nd).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in France</span>

Corruption in France describes the prevention and occurrence of corruption in France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Bangladesh</span>

Corruption in Bangladesh has been a continuing problem. According to all major ranking institutions, Bangladesh routinely finds itself among the most corrupt countries in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Romania</span>

Corruption in Romania has decreased in recent years. In particular since 2014, Romania undertook a significant anti-corruption effort that included the investigation and prosecution of medium- and high-level political, judicial and administrative officials by the National Anticorruption Directorate. The National Anticorruption Directorate was established in 2002 by the Romanian government to investigate and prosecute medium and high-level corruption related offenses, using a model of organization inspired by similar structures in Norway, Belgium and Spain. Adrian Zuckerman, the US Ambassador in Romania, has stated in 2021 that "the rule of law has been strengthened in Romania". Since 2022, the effectiveness of the investigation and sanctioning of high-level corruption further improved, including by advancing on cases that had been pending for years for procedural reasons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Czech Republic</span>

Corruption in the Czech Republic is considered to be widespread by a majority of the Czech public, according to Transparency International’s Global Corruption Barometer 2013.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in South Korea</span>

Corruption in South Korea is moderate compared to most countries in the Asia–Pacific and the broader international community. Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored South Korea at 63 on a scale between 0 and 100. When ranked by score, South Korea ranked 32nd among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among the countries of the Asia–Pacific region was 85, the average score was 45 and the lowest score was 17.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Uzbekistan</span>

Corruption in Uzbekistan is a serious problem. There are laws in place to prevent corruption, but enforcement in terms of laws regarding corruption is very weak. Low prosecution rates of corrupt officials is another contributing factor to the rampant corruption in Uzbekistan. It is not a criminal offense for a non-public official to influence the discretion of a public official. The judicial system faces severe functional deficits due to limited resources and corruption.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Vietnam</span>

Corruption in Vietnam is pervasive and widespread, due to weak legal infrastructure, financial unpredictability, and conflicting and negative bureaucratic decision-making. Surveys from 2015 revealed that while petty corruption decreased slightly throughout the country, high-level corruption significantly increased as a means of abuse of political power in Vietnam. Corruption is a very significant problem in Vietnam, impacting all aspects of administration, education and law enforcement.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Liberia</span>

Corruption is endemic at every level of Liberian society, making Liberia one of the most politically corrupt nations in the world. As such, corruption is not specifically a punishable crime under Liberian law, which further exacerbates the nature of corruption present in the country. When President Sirleaf took office in 2006, she announced that corruption was “the major public enemy.”

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Bolivia</span>

Corruption in Bolivia is a major problem that has been called an accepted part of life in the country. It can be found at all levels of Bolivian society. Citizens of the country perceive the judiciary, police and public administration generally as the country's most corrupt. Corruption is also widespread among officials who are supposed to control the illegal drug trade and among those working in and with extractive industries.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Ecuador</span>

Corruption in Ecuador is a serious problem. In 2014, the U.S. Department of State cited Ecuador's corruption as a key human-rights problem. According to Freedom House, "Ecuador has long been racked by corruption", and the weak judicial oversight and investigative resources perpetuate a culture of impunity.

Anti-corruption comprises activities that oppose or inhibit corruption. Just as corruption takes many forms, anti-corruption efforts vary in scope and in strategy. A general distinction between preventive and reactive measures is sometimes drawn. In such framework, investigative authorities and their attempts to unveil corrupt practices would be considered reactive, while education on the negative impact of corruption, or firm-internal compliance programs are classified as the former.

References

  1. ↑ Nathan, Andrew J. (2018-10-16). "Political Corruption and Scandals in Japan". Foreign Affairs. Vol. 97, no. 6. ISSN   0015-7120 . Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  2. ↑ "2023 Corruption Perceptions Index - Explore Japan's results". Transparency.org. 2024-01-30. Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  3. ↑ "The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption Perceptions Index is calculated". Transparency.org. 20 December 2021. Retrieved 3 August 2024.
  4. ↑ Snyder, Jack (1991). Myths of Empire: Domestic Politics and International Ambition. Cornell University Press. ISBN 978-0-8014-9764-3. p. 315.
  5. ↑ Andrain, Charles F. (1994). Comparative Political Systems: Policy Performance and Social Change. M.E. Sharpe. ISBN 978-1-56324-280-9. p. 3536.
  6. ↑ Morikawa, H. (1985). Japan and the World Economy. University of Chicago Press.
  7. 1 2 3 4 Yukawa, T. (n.d.). Anti-Corruption Measures: A Short History in Japan. UNAFEI. https://www.unafei.or.jp/publications/pdf/RS_No102/No102_21_SM_Yukawa.pdf.
  8. ↑ Kitagawa, Joseph M. (1990). Religion in Japanese History. Columbia University Press. ISBN 978-0-231-51509-2. p. 193
  9. 1 2 Mitchell, Richard H. (1996). Political Bribery in Japan. University of Hawaii Press. ISBN 978-0-8248-6396-8. p. 43, 68-69
  10. 1 2 Blaker, M. (1977). Japan 1976: The Year of Lockheed. Asian Survey, 17(1), 81–90
  11. ↑ Carpenter, S. (2015). The Route to Heaven-on-Earth. In: Japan Inc. on the Brink. Palgrave Macmillan, London. p. 65-76
  12. ↑ Usui, Chikako; Colignon, Richard A. (2018). Amakudari: The Hidden Fabric of Japan's Economy. Cornell University Press. ISBN   978-1-5017-2261-5. Project MUSE   book 59973.[ page needed ]
  13. 1 2 "The Problem with Amakudari". thediplomat.com. Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  14. ↑ Magill, Frank N. (2014). Chronology of Twentieth-Century History: Business and Commerce: Volume II. Routledge. ISBN 978-1-134-26462-9. p. 1377
  15. ↑ Mizoguchi, Tetsuro and Van Quyen, Nguyen. (2009). Amakudari: The Post-Retirement Employment of Elite Bureaucrats in Japan. Journal of Public Economic Theory, Jan. 2009
  16. ↑ "Japan accuses 47 companies of rigging bids". UPI.
  17. ↑ "Olympus scandal: Former bosses to pay $529m over fraud". BBC News. 2017-04-28. Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  18. 1 2 "Olympus admits it hid losses for decades". France 24. 2011-11-08. Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  19. 1 2 "Japan: Corruption scandal threatens PM Kishida's government". 2023-12-22. Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  20. ↑ Oyamada, E. (2015), "Anti-corruption measures the Japanese way: prevention matters", Asian Education and Development Studies, Vol. 4 No. 1, pp. 24-50
  21. ↑ "Anti-Corruption" . Retrieved 2024-09-05.
  22. ↑ Izumi, Junichi. "Contracting Procedures of the Japanese Government" (PDF). unafei.or.jp
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.