Corruption in Bulgaria

Last updated

Corruption in Bulgaria has decreased in recent years, [1] after a series of reforms implemented through EU guidance. [2] Among recent improvements, amendments to the constitution in 2015 brought about a reform of the Supreme Judicial Council and a stronger judicial inspectorate. Furthermore, the broader legislative framework has seen a number of reforms over the years, in particular through the amendments of the Judicial System Act in 2016 and of the Criminal Procedure Code in 2017. [2]

Contents

Corruption Perceptions Index

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is released by Transparency International at the beginning of each year. The report is based on the polling of experts from around the world on topics such as a free press, integrity, and independent judiciaries. In the CPI, lower-ranked countries experience “untrustworthy and badly functioning public institutions like the police and judiciary.” [3]

In the 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, Bulgaria scored 45 on a scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean"). When ranked by score, Bulgaria ranked 67th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. [4] For comparison, the best score was 90 (ranked 1), and the worst score was 11 (ranked 180). [5]

Types of corruption

Lobbying

A 2014 study by Transparency International indicated that lobbying in Bulgaria is mainly unregulated and happens behind closed doors. “The report Lobbying in Bulgaria: Interests, Influence, Politics shows that there are significant deficits in the transparency, integrity, and equality of access regarding influence over public decision-making in the country.” The study used a framework from a project called “lifting the lid on lobbying,” and Bulgaria received a “paltry overall score of only 25%.” For transparency, Bulgaria received a score of 13%; for integrity, 25%; and 38% for free quality of access. By 2014, four legislative proposals had been introduced in Bulgaria's parliament, but none of the bills passed. [6]

Vote-buying

During the 2014 parliamentary election, Bulgaria’s Transparency International telephone helpline received 202 complaints. One of the top three complaints concerned vote-buying. [7] A pub owner in a small village offered Roma voters US$40–$55 to vote a certain way, with the money paid only if the political party in question won. [7] Some 480,000 illegally printed ballots were discovered at a printing house in Kostinbrod the day before the May 2013 parliamentary election. The blank ballots might have been prepared to manipulate the vote. The owner of the printing house, a municipal councilor from GERB, claimed that the ballots were technical spoilage. [8]

Judiciary

In 2017, the Council of Europe expressed concern about the lack of judicial independence and the compromised separation of powers in the country. [9] The Venice Commission has raised concern about the Soviet model of Bulgaria's Prosecution, which turns it into “a source of corruption and blackmail.” [10] Civil activists have demanded the resignation of Bulgaria's General Prosecutor Sotir Tsatsarov for some time now, due to his alleged involvement in high-profile corruption cases. [11]

Public tenders

Government procurement is an area of significant corruption risk. Many of the public contracts are awarded to a few politically connected [12] companies amid widespread irregularities, procedure violations, and tailor-made award criteria. [13] Ognyan Gerdzhikov's interim government found widespread violations in defense procurement, after it took over from the Second Borisov Government in 2017; 45 out of 82 defense ministry contracts signed the previous year were in breach of public procurement laws and regulations. Fraud was strongly suspected in nine of the procedures. [14]

An estimated 10 billion leva ($5.99 billion) of state budget and European cohesion funds are spent on public tenders each year; [15] nearly 14 billion ($8.38 billion) were spent on public contracts in 2017 alone. [16]

Effects

Economic mismanagement

Corruption has resulted in significant economic losses and underperformance in Bulgaria. Since its accession to the EU in 2007, it has remained the Union's poorest country, with a per-capita GDP of $16,300—less than half the European average. By 2014, the Bulgarian government was accused of mismanaging the economy so badly that the European Union froze billions of euros in aid. [17] Between 2008 and 2018, foreign direct investment collapsed, dropping from 28% to 2% of GDP, or $9 billion to just $1.13 billion. [17] [18] The cabinets of Boyko Borisov have been in power through most of the decade, establishing a system of impunity for high-profile crime, and favoritism of certain local companies. Approximately 22% of GDP is lost to corruption each year, and a number of major foreign companies, like ČEZ Group, have withdrawn from Bulgaria. [18]

Social unrest

Corruption is a source of profound public discontent. [19] Corruption and government inaction against convicted Roma criminal Kiril Rashkov sparked the 2011 anti-Roma riots. [20] The 2013 Bulgarian protests against the first Borisov cabinet spread to over 30 cities, and were marked by seven self-immolations, five of which were fatal. [21] The protests, directed against corruption, poverty, and political parties, led to the resignation of the First Borisov Government. [22] Mass demonstrations continued against the government of Plamen Oresharski, which also resigned following the appointment of Delyan Peevski as head of the State Agency for National Security. [23] Another wave of demonstrations occurred in November 2018 against low wages, as well as fuel price and vehicle tax hikes. [24] Some 20 cities saw protests demanding the resignation of the Third Borisov Government; several major roads were blocked. [25] Grand corruption disclosures in June 2020 led to the 2020-2021 Bulgarian mass anti-government protests. This was the cause of GERB losing the April and July 2021 parliamentary elections after ruling the country for 12 years.

Deterioration of media freedom

According to Reporters Without Borders, the press industry in Bulgaria is rife with “corruption and collusion between media, politicians, and oligarchs.” [26] Media ownership is opaque, not transparent, and concentrated in the hands of a few owners—despite a superficial diversity in ownership. Upon joining the European Union in 2007, Bulgaria ranked 35th on the Press Freedom Index, alongside France. [26] It has since tumbled to 111th, by far the worst press freedom performer of any EU member and candidate state. More than 90% of Bulgarian journalists, as polled by the Association of European Journalists, have reported frequent interference with their work. Lawmakers have gone as far as threatening TV journalists with sacking during a live broadcast. [26] The media environment has been further degraded by EU funds diverted by the government to sympathetic media outlets. [27] [28] In 2018, two journalists were detained and later released by police while they investigated a massive scheme to drain EU funds by a company associated with a number of high-profile government procurement projects. [29]

Progress in anti-corruption measures

In Bulgaria, the period since the report of November 2018 to around 2021 was characterised by relative political stability, though a particular controversy emerged around allegations concerning the acquisition of properties at below-market prices by high-level officials and politicians. [2]

In the November 2018 CVM report, benchmarks one (judicial independence), two (legal framework) and six (organized crime) have been provisionally closed, noting that Bulgaria has made significant progress in these areas. [2] Judicial appointments and the functioning of the judicial inspectorate were identified as areas for ongoing monitoring, and certain aspects of the legal environment also remained open for further consideration in the context of other benchmarks. [2]

The Commission’s latest CVM report, adopted in October 2019, recorded that Bulgaria had made a number of further commitments and concluded that the progress made under the CVM was sufficient to meet Bulgaria's commitments made at the time of its accession to the EU. [30]

Related Research Articles

Transparency International e.V. (TI) is a German registered association founded in 1993 by former employees of the World Bank. Based in Berlin, its nonprofit and non-governmental purpose is to take action to combat global corruption with civil societal anti-corruption measures and to prevent criminal activities arising from corruption. Its most notable publications include the Global Corruption Barometer and the Corruption Perceptions Index. Transparency International serves as an umbrella organization. From 1993 to today, its membership has grown from a few individuals to more than 100 national chapters, which engage in fighting perceived corruption in their home countries. TI is a member of G20 Think Tanks, UNESCO Consultative Status, United Nations Global Compact, Sustainable Development Solutions Network and shares the goals of peace, justice, strong institutions and partnerships of the United Nations Sustainable Development Group (UNSDG). TI is a social partner of Global Alliance in Management Education. TI confirmed the dis-accreditation of the national chapter of United States of America in 2017.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption Perceptions Index</span> Country ranking by public sector corruption

The Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI) is an index which ranks countries "by their perceived levels of public sector corruption, as determined by expert assessments and opinion surveys." The CPI generally defines corruption as an "abuse of entrusted power for private gain". The index is published annually by the non-governmental organisation Transparency International since 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Philippines</span> State of corruption in the country

The Philippines suffers from widespread corruption, which developed during the Spanish colonial period. According to GAN Integrity's Philippines Corruption Report updated May 2020, the Philippines suffers from many incidents of corruption and crime in many aspects of civic life and in various sectors. Such corruption risks are rampant throughout the state's judicial system, police service, public services, land administration, and natural resources.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime in Bulgaria</span>

Crime in Bulgaria is combated by the Bulgarian police and other agencies. The UK Government ranks Bulgaria as a low crime area and crime there has significantly decreased in recent years.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Crime in Hungary</span>

Crime in Hungary is combated by the Hungarian police and other agencies.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Ukraine</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption is an issue in Ukrainian society going back to the dissolution of the Soviet Union in 1991. After declaring independence from the Soviet Union, Ukraine faced a series of politicians from different sides of the political spectrum, as well as criminal bosses and oligarchs, who used the corruption of police, political parties, and industry to gain power. Despite improvements, as in Moldova corruption remains an obstacle to joining the EU.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Romania</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Romania has decreased in recent years. In particular since 2014, Romania undertook a significant anti-corruption effort that included the investigation and prosecution of medium- and high-level political, judicial and administrative officials by the National Anticorruption Directorate. The National Anticorruption Directorate was established in 2002 by the Romanian government to investigate and prosecute medium and high-level corruption related offenses, using a model of organization inspired by similar structures in Norway, Belgium and Spain. Adrian Zuckerman, the US Ambassador in Romania, has stated in 2021 that "the rule of law has been strengthened in Romania". Since 2022, the effectiveness of the investigation and sanctioning of high-level corruption further improved, including by advancing on cases that had been pending for years for procedural reasons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Sweden</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Sweden has been defined as "the abuse of power" by Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå). By receiving bribes, bribe takers abuse their position of power, which is consistent with how the National Anti-Corruption Unit of the Swedish Prosecution Authority specifies the term. Although bribes and improper rewards are central in the definition of corruption in Sweden, corruption in the sense of "abuse of power" can also manifest itself in other crimes such as misuse of office, embezzlement, fraud and breach of trust against a principal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Cyprus</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Cyprus is a salient concern for people in Cyprus: As of 2022, 94% considered that corruption was widespread in the country.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Luxembourg</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Levels of corruption in Luxembourg are generally said to be very low, and there a strong legal framework for combating corruption in the country. Surveys however indicate that a majority of the population believe political parties are either "corrupt" or "extremely corrupt."

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Latvia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Latvia is examined on this page.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the Netherlands</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in the Netherlands in all major areas—judiciary, police, business, politics—as the country is considered one of the least corrupt within the European Union.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Austria</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Austria has a well-developed institutional and legal system, and most corruption cases under investigation by a parliamentary committee end with judicial trials and effective judgments. However, there are several significant Austrian corruption cases which have taken place during the past decade involving land and regional officials, high-level public officials, the central government and, in one instance, the former Chancellor.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Slovakia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Slovakia is a serious and ongoing problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boyko Borisov</span> Prime Minister of Bulgaria thrice between 2009 and 2021

Boyko Metodiev Borisov is a Bulgarian politician who served as the prime minister of Bulgaria from 2009 to 2013, 2014 to 2017, and 2017 to 2021, making him Bulgaria's second-longest serving prime minister to date.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Moldova</span> Institutional corruption in the country

The government in Moldova has in recent years taken several steps to fight corruption, including law enforcement and institutional setups. The prosecution of officials who are involved in corruption has also increased in recent years. However, businesses consider corruption a serious problem for doing business, and the business environment continues to be one of the most challenging in the region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Serbia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption levels are perceived to be high by surveyed residents of Serbia, and public trust in key institutions remains low.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Chad</span> Political corruption

Corruption in Chad is characterized by nepotism and cronyism. Chad received a score of 19 in the 2022 Transparency International Corruption Perceptions Index on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Chad ranked 164th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison, the best score was 90, and the worst score was 12.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in the United Kingdom</span>

Transparency International defines corruption as "the abuse of entrusted power for private gain". Transparency International's 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index scored the United Kingdom at 73 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, the United Kingdom ranked 18th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the worst score was 12, and the average score was 43. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Western European and European Union countries was 90, the average score was 66 and the lowest score was 42. The United Kingdom's score of 73 in 2022 was its lowest ever in the eleven years that the current version of the Index has been published.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Nepal</span>

Corruption in Nepal is widespread and extends to every sector from the government to the judiciary, police, health services, and education.

References

  1. ↑ "Extent of public corruption in Bulgaria".
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 "REPORT FROM THE COMMISSION TO THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND THE COUNCIL on Progress in Bulgaria under the Cooperation and Verification Mechanism" (PDF). European Commission. 2019. Retrieved 20 October 2022. CC-BY icon.svg Text was copied from this source, which is available under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
  3. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2016". Transparency International. 25 January 2017. Retrieved 1 February 2017.
  4. ↑ "The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption Perceptions Index is calculated". Transparency.org. Retrieved 6 March 2023.
  5. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2022: Bulgaria". Transparency.org. Retrieved 6 March 2023.
  6. ↑ "Bulgaria: Opaque Relations Among Politics And Business Undermine Trust In Institutions And Democracy". Transparency International. 16 December 2014.
  7. 1 2 "The Price of a Vote in a Bulgarian Pub". Transparency International. 9 June 2015. Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  8. ↑ "Bulgaria's 'Fake Vote Ballots' Final Count Is 480 000". Novinite. 7 June 2013. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  9. ↑ "PACE, worried about threats to the rule of law, points to recent developments in five states". Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 12 October 2017. Retrieved 29 November 2017.
  10. ↑ "Delayed EU Audit of Bulgaria Prosecution Raises Concern". Balkan Insight. 5 May 2016. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  11. ↑ "Христо Иванов: Има 3 несъмнени основания за моментална оставка на Цацаров". mediapool.bg. 23 April 2017. Retrieved 28 November 2017.
  12. ↑ Stefanov, Ruslan (2015). "The Bulgarian Public Procurement Market: Corruption Risks and Dynamics in the Construction Sector" (PDF). Government Favouritism in Europe: The Anticorruption Report 3 (3/2015): 35. doi:10.2307/j.ctvdf0g12.6 . Retrieved 6 August 2018.
  13. ↑ "Public procurement in Bulgaria" (PDF). European Commission. 2015. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
  14. ↑ "Bulgaria's new interim government finds many irregular defense contracts". Reuters. 17 February 2017. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  15. ↑ "10 млрд. лв. годишно се харчат с обществени поръчки" [10 bln. leva are spent on public procurement every year]. 24 Chasa (in Bulgarian). 21 February 2016. Retrieved 30 July 2018.
  16. ↑ Stanchev, Ivaylo (29 December 2017). "Рекорд при обществените поръчки: открити са търгове за почти 14 млрд. лв" [A record in public procurement: tenders worth nearly 14 billion lv unveiled] (in Bulgarian). Kapital Daily. Retrieved 16 July 2018.
  17. 1 2 Ewing, Jack; Kantchev, Georgi (7 July 2014). "In Bulgaria, Corruption and Mistrust Turn Promise Into Pain". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331 . Retrieved 6 February 2017.
  18. 1 2 Holmund, Caroline (27 September 2018). "As Foreign Firms Flee, Bulgaria Must Finally Curb Its Corruption Problem". The Diplomatic Courier . Retrieved 8 May 2020.
  19. ↑ Rankin, Jennifer (28 December 2017). "Cloud of corruption hangs over Bulgaria as it takes up EU presidency". The Guardian. Retrieved 9 July 2018.
  20. ↑ "Sleepy village an unlikely spark for Roma protests". Reuters. 30 September 2011. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  21. ↑ "Bulgaria holds prayers to end suicides and despair". BBC News. 5 April 2013. Retrieved 10 May 2013.
  22. ↑ "Protests in Bulgaria and the new practice of democracy". Al-Jazeera English. 21 February 2013. Retrieved 7 March 2013.
  23. ↑ Tsolova, Tsvetelina (14 June 2013). "Bulgarians protests over media magnate as security chief". reuters.com. Retrieved 23 June 2013.
  24. ↑ "Damp day of protests in Sofia, other Bulgarian cities". The Sofia Globe. 18 November 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  25. ↑ "Thousands protest in Bulgaria against high fuel prices, car taxes". Reuters. 11 November 2018. Retrieved 28 November 2018.
  26. 1 2 3 "Reporters face obstacle run in corruption-hit Bulgaria". Euractiv. 23 February 2018. Retrieved 18 November 2018.
  27. ↑ "Bulgaria". Reporters Without Borders . Retrieved 20 May 2018.
  28. ↑ Greenslade, Roy (23 September 2014). "Why Bulgaria is the EU's lowest ranked country on press freedom index". The Guardian. Retrieved 20 May 2018.
  29. ↑ "PM Boyko Borisov orders the removal of officials named in Bivol investigative reporting about massive EU funds corruption scheme". Mediapool. 21 September 2018. Retrieved 27 November 2018.
  30. ↑ Official website of the European Union
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.