Corruption in Armenia

Last updated

Corruption in Armenia has decreased significantly in modern times, but remains an ongoing problem in the country. Despite this, fighting corruption following the 2018 Armenian revolution has recorded significant progress. Armenia is a member of the Council of Europe's Group of States Against Corruption (GRECO) and the OECD's Anti-Corruption Network and Armenia's anti-corruption measures are regularly evaluated within their monitoring mechanisms. [1]

Contents

Progress since 2018

In 2023, Armenia ranked 62nd out of 180 countries in the Corruption Perceptions Index (CPI), scoring 47 on a scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean"). A rank of 180 (and a low score) is a country that is perceived to be highly corrupted and a rank of 1 (and a high score) is a country perceived to be corruption-free. Worldwide, the best score was 90 (ranked 1), the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11 (ranked 180). Thus, Armenia scored roughly in the middle in the 2023 CPI. [2] [3] Regionally, the highest score among Eastern European and Central Asian countries [Note 1] was 53, the average score was 35 and the lowest score was 18. [4]

Armenia recorded significant progress in fighting corruption between 2018 and 2020, improving its CPI score from 35 to 49 and its rank from 105th to 60th. [5] [6] Its CPI score increase of 7 points between 2019 and 2020 was the second-best improvement worldwide. [7] In a comparison conducted in 2020, Armenia (ranked in 60th place in the 2020 CPI) was perceived to be less corrupt than three of its neighboring countries, Azerbaijan (ranked 129th), Iran (149th) and Turkey (86th). [8] Armenia's fourth neighbor, Georgia, was ranked 45th in the 2020 CPI. [7]

The European Union and Armenia ratified the Armenia-EU Comprehensive and Enhanced Partnership Agreement in March 2021. The agreement includes provisions to fight organized crime and corruption, protect human rights, and further develop democracy in the country. [9]

The following chart represents the score of Armenia in Transparency International's Corruption Perceptions Index; the higher the score, the less perceived corruption there is. [3]

Anti-corruption strategy

Since 22 January 2001, the Government of Armenia has aimed to reach minimum corruption in the country by developing an anti-corruption strategy, while developing an implementation plan along with a Steering Committee. Armenia put large emphasis on the fight against corruption, ensuring the participation of various NGOs, governmental and non-governmental actors, and other institutions in the act of anti-corruption promotion. [10] To reach the goal of eliminating corruption, the government focuses on:

  1. The creation of a fair public administration system based on the rule of law.
  2. The detection and investigation of the act of corruption and proper liability.
  3. Raise awareness about the reasons and negative causes of corruption.
  4. Disallowance of abuse from officials to an individual.
  5. Enforcement of special laws against corruption. [10]

The program sets priorities in the fight against corruption, which are raising public awareness of the danger posed to society by corruption and its consequences; preventing corruption and ensuring the rule of law in order to protect the rights and legitimate interests of individuals. [10]

Earlier developments

According to Transparency International's 2014 report, entrenched corruption, strong patronage networks, a lack of clear separation between private enterprise and public office, as well as, the overlap between political and business elites in Armenia render the implementation of anti-corruption efforts relatively inefficient and feed a pervasive political apathy and cynicism on the part of citizens, who do not see an impactful role for themselves in the fight against corruption. [11]

In 2006, the United Nations Development Programme in Armenia stated that corruption in Armenia is "a serious challenge to its development." [12] The selective and non-transparent application of tax, customs and regulatory rules, as well as weak enforcement of court decisions fuels opportunities for corruption. The Armenian procurement system is characterized by instances of unfair tender processes and preferential treatment. Relationship between high-ranking government officials and the emerging private business sector encourage influence peddling. The government has reportedly failed to fund implementation of the anti-corruption strategy and devoted no money and little commitment for anti-corruption efforts.

The main anti-corruption institutions of the Armenian government are an Anti-Corruption Council – headed by the prime minister – and the Anti-Corruption Strategy Monitoring Commission, established in June 2004 to strengthen the implementation of anticorruption policy. However, these institutions scarcely functioned in 2006-2007, even though they were supposed to meet twice-quarterly and monthly, respectively. [13] Furthermore, the Armenian Anti-Corruption Council was accused of lavish spending and has largely failed to investigate or prosecute senior officials. [14] [15]

The late Prime Minister Andranik Margarian, launched Armenia's first post-Soviet campaign against corruption in 2003. The initiative, however, has been widely disparaged for being short on results. [16] Former Prime Minister Tigran Sargsyan, has acknowledged that corruption is Armenia's "number one problem that obstructs all our reforms." [16]

The government has launched an anti-graft campaign which has been accompanied by changes in customs regulations, reported tax police inspections of companies owned by pro-government businesspeople and numerous high-profile firings of people in the tax department, customs service and police. The recent crackdown on corruption has received mixed reactions. [16]

Areas

Mining

Regulation of mineral industry carries multiple corruption risks, as it was highlighted by international research. [17]

Education

Despite the success of the authorities in reducing petty corruption/bribery in some citizen-government interactions, anti-corruption watchdogs report that entrenched corruption, strong patronage networks, a lack of clear separation between private enterprise and public office, as well as, the overlap between political and business elites limit the effective implementation of anti-corruption efforts. These problems affect the education system too. It is perceived as one of the sectors that is hit hardest by corruption. Attempts to fight the problem have brought mixed results and often opened new opportunities for malpractice instead of closing the existing ones. [18] [19]

Tax and customs agencies

In 2007, World Bank economists pointed to serious problems with rule of law and widespread corruption in the Armenian Tax Service and the Armenian Customs Service. [20]

Misappropriation of international loans

In March 2004, an ad hoc commission of the National Assembly, investigating the use of a $30 million World Bank loan concluded that mismanagement and corruption among government officials and private firms was the reason of the failure of the program to upgrade Yerevan's battered water infrastructure. [21] The World Bank issued the loan in 1999 in order to improve Yerevan residents' access to drinking water. The government promised to ensure around-the-clock water supplies to the vast majority of households by 2004, but as of 2008, most city residents continue to have running water for only a few hours a day. [21]

Veolia Environnement, the French utility giant that took over Yerevan's loss-making water and sewerage network in 2006, has said that it will need a decade to end water rationing. [21] In August 2007, Bruce Tasker, a Yerevan-based British engineer who had participated in the parliamentary inquiry as an expert, publicly implicated not only Armenian officials and businessmen but also World Bank representatives in Yerevan in the alleged misuse of the loan. In a 4 October 2007 news conference, the World Bank Yerevan office head Aristomene Varoudakis denied the allegations, claiming that the World Bank disclosed fully all information available on the project to the parliamentary commission and that based on this information, there was no evidence of fraud or mismanagement in the project. [21]

Northern Avenue residents protest the proposed demolition of their building through signs and posters, 2011. Eminent domain, Northern Avenue, Yerevan.JPG
Northern Avenue residents protest the proposed demolition of their building through signs and posters, 2011.

Illegitimate use of eminent domain

Eminent domain laws [22] have been used to forcefully remove residents, business owners, and land owners from their property. The projects that are built on these sites are not of state interest, but rather are privately owned by the same authorities who have executed the eminent domain clause. A prominent example is the development of Yerevan's Northern Avenue area. Another involves an ongoing project (as of November 2008) to construct a trade center near Yerevan's botanical garden. The new land owners were Yerevan's former mayor Yervand Zakharyan and Deputy Mayor Karen Davtyan, who was at one time Director of the Armenian Development Agency and successfully executed the eviction of residents on Northern Avenue. [23]

Notes

  1. ↑ Albania, Armenia, Azerbaijan, Belarus, Bosnia and Herzegovina, Georgia, Kazakhstan, Kosovo, Kyrgyzstan, Moldova, Montenegro, North Macedonia, Russia, Serbia, Tajikistan, Turkey, Turkmenistan, Ukraine, Uzbekistan

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in New Zealand</span> Institutional corruption in the country

This article discusses the responsibilities of the various agencies involved in combating corruption in New Zealand. New Zealand is regarded as having one of the lowest levels of corruption in the world.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Bahrain</span> Institutional corruption in the country

In Transparency International's 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index, which scored 180 countries on a scale from 0 to 100, Bahrain scored 44. When ranked by score, Bahrain ranked 69th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison, the best score was 90, the worst score was 12, and the average score was 43.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Albania</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Albania is a very serious problem. According to Global Corruption Barometer 2013, 66% of respondents indicated that level of corruption has increased in Albania.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Turkey</span> Institutional corruption in the Republic of Turkey

Corruption in Turkey is an issue affecting the accession of Turkey to the European Union. Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index scores 180 countries according to their perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 to 100. Since the current scale was introduced in 2012, Turkey's score has fallen from its highest score of 50 (2013) to its lowest, current score of 36 (2022). When the 180 countries in the Index were ranked by their score, Turkey ranked 101 in 2022.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Poland</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Poland is below the world average but not insignificant. Within Poland, surveys of Polish citizens reveal that it is perceived to be a major problem.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Sweden</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Sweden has been defined as "the abuse of power" by Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå). By receiving bribes, bribe takers abuse their position of power, which is consistent with how the National Anti-Corruption Unit of the Swedish Prosecution Authority specifies the term. Although bribes and improper rewards are central in the definition of corruption in Sweden, corruption in the sense of "abuse of power" can also manifest itself in other crimes such as misuse of office, embezzlement, fraud and breach of trust against a principal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Denmark</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Denmark is amongst the lowest in the world. According to the 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index from Transparency International, Denmark scored 90 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Denmark held first place among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first are perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison, the worst score was 12 and the average was 43. The International Consortium of Investigative Journalists reported in 2014 that Denmark has consistently been in the top-4 since the publication of the first Corruption Perceptions Index report in 1995.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Switzerland</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Switzerland describes the prevention and occurrence of corruption in Switzerland.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Latvia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Latvia is examined on this page.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Portugal</span> Institutional corruption in the country

In 2013, a report by Transparency International revealed that political parties, Parliament, the judiciary and the military are the most corrupt institutions in Portugal. Transparency International's 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index ranks the country in 33rd place out of 180 countries in the Index.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Germany</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Transparency International's 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index scored Germany at 79 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Germany ranked 9th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison, the best score was 90, the worst score was 12, and the average score was 43.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in South Korea</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in South Korea is moderate compared to most countries in the Asia-Pacific and the broader international community. Transparency International's 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index scored South Korea at 63 on a scale between 0 and 100. When ranked by score, South Korea ranked 31st among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison, the best score was 90, and the worst score was 12.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Morocco</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Petty and grand corruption is a growing problem within Morocco. A leaked report by a US diplomat stated in 2009 that corruption had become much more institutionalized under King Mohammed VI, and that the royal family had been using public institutions to coerce and solicit bribes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Georgia</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Georgia had been an issue in the post-Soviet decades. Before the 2003 Rose Revolution, according to Foreign Policy, Georgia was among the most corrupt nations in Eurasia. The level of corruption abated dramatically, however, after the revolution. In 2010, Transparency International (TI) said that Georgia was "the best corruption-buster in the world." While low-level corruption had earlier been largely eliminated, Transparency International Georgia since 2020 has also documented dozens of cases of high-level corruption that remain to be prosecuted.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Jordan</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Jordan is a social and economic issue.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Uganda</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Uganda is characterized by grand-scale theft of public funds and petty corruption involving public officials at all levels of society as well as widespread political patronage systems. Elite corruption in Uganda is through a patronage system which has been exacerbated by foreign aid. Aid has been providing the government with large amounts of resources that contribute to the corrupt practices going on within the country. The style of corruption that is used is to gain loyalty and support so that officials can remain in power. One of the more recent forms of corruption is through public procurement because of the lack of transparency with transactions that happen within the government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Moldova</span> Institutional corruption in the country

The government in Moldova has in recent years taken several steps to fight corruption, including law enforcement and institutional setups. The prosecution of officials who are involved in corruption has also increased in recent years. However, businesses consider corruption a serious problem for doing business, and the business environment continues to be one of the most challenging in the region.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Tajikistan</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Tajikistan is a widespread phenomenon that is found in all spheres of Tajik society. The situation is essentially similar to that in the other former Soviet republics of Central Asia. Reliable specifics about corruption can be difficult to come by, however, as can hard information about the effectiveness of supposed anti-corruption initiatives.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Azerbaijan</span> Institutional corruption in the country

Corruption in Azerbaijan is considered high and occurs at all levels of government. Corruption during the Soviet era was rife and persists into the present.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Corruption in Israel</span> Institutional corruption in the country

There is evidence that corruption is a legitimate problem in Israeli politics and many investigations have taken place into allegations of influence peddling and bribery.

References

  1. ↑ "FOURTH EVALUATION ROUND on Armenia".
  2. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2023: Armenia". Transparency.org. Retrieved 17 March 2024.
  3. 1 2 "The ABCs of the CPI: How the Corruption Perceptions Index is calculated". Transparency.org. Retrieved 17 March 2024.
  4. ↑ "CPI 2023 for Eastern Europe & Central Asia: Autocracy & weak justice systems enabling widespread corruption". Transparency.org. Retrieved 17 March 2024.
  5. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2020 for Armenia". Transparency.org. 28 January 2021. Retrieved 2023-03-19.
  6. ↑ "Corruption Perceptions Index 2018 for Armenia". Transparency.org. 29 January 2019. Retrieved 2023-03-19.
  7. 1 2 ռ/կ, Ազատություն (17 March 2024). "Armenia Continues To Rise In Global Corruption Rankings". «Ազատ Եվրոպա/Ազատություն» ռադիոկայան (in Armenian). Retrieved 17 March 2024.
  8. ↑ "Armenia improves ranking in Corruption Perceptions index 2020". Public Radio of Armenia. Retrieved 17 March 2024.
  9. ↑ "EUR-Lex - 52017JC0037 - EN - EUR-Lex". eur-lex.europa.eu.
  10. 1 2 3 "REPUBLIC OF ARMENIA ANTI-CORRUPTION STRATEGY AND IMPLEMENTATION ACTION PLAN" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2011-05-31.
  11. ↑ "TI's 2014 National Integrity System Assessment Armenia". Archived from the original on 2019-12-03. Retrieved 2017-03-23.
  12. ↑ "Strengthening Cooperation between the National Assembly, Civil Society and the Media in the Fight Against Corruption" Archived 2006-05-02 at the Wayback Machine , Speech by Ms. Consuelo Vidal, (UN RC / UNDP RR), April 6, 2006.
  13. ↑ Global Corruption Report 2008 Archived 2010-09-03 at the Wayback Machine , Transparency International, Chapter 7.4, p. 225.
  14. ↑ Grigoryan, Marianna (2015-08-12). "Armenia's anti-corruption council accused of lavish spending". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077 . Retrieved 2017-03-14.
  15. ↑ "The Guardian: Armenia's anti-corruption council accused of lavish spending" . Retrieved 2017-03-14.
  16. 1 2 3 "ARMENIA: GETTING SERIOUS ABOUT CORRUPTION?" Archived 2008-07-27 at the Wayback Machine , EurasiaNet, July 11, 2008.
  17. ↑ e.V., Transparency International (5 December 2017). "TI Publication - Combatting corruption in mining approvals". www.transparency.org. Retrieved 2018-02-28.
  18. ↑ Strengthening integrity and fighting corruption in education: Armenia, Open Society Foundations - Armenia and Center for Applied Policy, 2015
  19. ↑ Armenia,3 Round of Monitoring of the Istanbul Action Plan, OECD Publishing, 2014
  20. ↑ World Bank Urges ‘Second Generation Reforms’ In Armenia, Armenia Liberty (RFE/RL), March 20, 2007.
  21. 1 2 3 4 Corruption Chronicles: International Loans, Eurasianet.org, 2008.
  22. ↑ The Constitution of the Republic of Armenia (27 November 2005), Chapter 2: Fundamental Human and Civil Rights and Freedoms, Article 31 Archived 27 November 2010 at the Wayback Machine
  23. ↑ The Yerevan Municipality Allocates a Parcel of Land to one of its Employees under the Guise of “Eminent Domain” Archived 2009-08-21 at the Wayback Machine , Hetq Online, November 10, 2008.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.