Political corruption |
---|
Forms and concepts |
Anti-corruption |
Corruption by country |
Corruption is low in Uruguay by regional standards. [1] It has generally outperformed other Latin American countries frequently in corruption related international indexes. [2]
On Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, Uruguay scored 73 on a scale from 0 ("highly corrupt") to 100 ("very clean"). When ranked by score, Uruguay ranked 16th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. [3] For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90 (ranked 1), the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11 (ranked 180). [4] For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among the countries of the Americas [Note 1] was 76, the average score was 43 and the lowest score was 13. [5]
Analysts have cited several reasons as contributing factors for the low corruption level in Uruguay. First of all, it generally enjoys higher income levels than the Latin American average, although when GDP per capita or purchasing power parity is taken into account, it is on par with Chile and Argentina [2]
In addition, Uruguay is a small, homogenous country where 40% of the population reside in the capital Montevideo. Combatting corruption is typically easier in large urban centers rather than federal or continental democracies. Furthermore, Uruguay has successfully established a vibrant democratic system which has ensured strong institutional frameworks, though some issues with campaign financing make political parties vulnerable to corrupt influences. [2]
Social inclusionary policies such as introducing pensions which reach 87% of the people as well as a lower level of unemployment also have played a significant role in cutting down corruption. [6]
Uruguayan political parties have avoided clientelism, which have assuaged concerns of corruption. Besides, the expenditure in a public project is generally fixed, so the opportunity for discretionary politics is very limited. [7]
Despite the low corruption prevalent in the country, there have been accusations of corruption against government officials, including ex-president Jose Mujica who was being investigated in a corruption case involving a gas company. [2]
Uruguay's historical record of financial secrecy has also exacerbated the risks of corruption. It is difficult for foreign countries to obtain records of their residents' undisclosed assets in Uruguay. This secrecy has created fertile ground for individuals to evade taxes in their respective countries of residence. For example, Spanish authorities investigated Argentine football superstar Lionel Messi for allegedly avoiding £4.2 million in taxes by taking opportunity of Uruguayan regulations. [7]
The main anti-corruption body in the country has also faced a lack of resources in its pursuit to tackle corruption. [1]
Uruguay has been party to the United Nations Convention against Corruption (UNCAC) since 2007 and the Inter-American Convention against Corruption since 1998. [7] Its anti-corruption bodies and the judiciary are generally deemed to be independent.
The country has an anti-bribery law which prohibits government officials from taking or soliciting bribes. Anyone offering such a bribe will be imprisoned for six years. The law for control and prevention of money laundering stipulates prison sentences of up to ten years for such crimes. [8]
Uruguay obliges political parties to declare their campaign financing and expenditures. Access to freedom of information is also generally upheld. However, there is no limit on how much a party can receive in contributions. Although important state officials submit asset declarations to the anti-corruption bodies, they are not made public. Whistleblower protection is also limited and revolving door practices still remain unregulated. [7]
Observers maintain that corruption in Paraguay remains a major impediment to the emergence of stronger democratic institutions and sustainable economic development in Paraguay.
Corruption in the United States is the act of government officials abusing their political powers for private gain, typically through bribery or other methods, in the United States government. Corruption in the United States has been a perennial political issue, peaking in the Jacksonian era and the Gilded Age before declining with the reforms of the Progressive Era.
Corruption is perceived as a significant problem in Russia, impacting various aspects of life, including the economy, business, public administration, law enforcement, healthcare, and education. The phenomenon of corruption is strongly established in the historical model of public governance, and attributed to general weakness of rule of law in the country. Transparency International stated in 2022, "Corruption is endemic in Russia" and assigned it the lowest score of any European country in their Corruption Perceptions Index for 2021. It has, under the regime of Vladimir Putin, been variously characterized as a kleptocracy, an oligarchy, and a plutocracy; owing to its crony capitalism economic system.
The Philippines suffers from widespread corruption, which developed during the Spanish colonial period. According to GAN Integrity's Philippines Corruption Report updated May 2020, the Philippines suffers from many incidents of corruption and crime in many aspects of civic life and in various sectors. Such corruption risks are rampant throughout the state's judicial system, police service, public services, land administration, and natural resources.
Corruption in Turkey is an issue affecting the accession of Turkey to the European Union. Transparency International's Corruption Perception Index scores 180 countries according to their perceived level of public sector corruption on a scale of 0 to 100. Since the current scale was introduced in 2012, Turkey's score has fallen from its highest score of 50 (2013) to its lowest, current score of 34 (2023). When the 180 countries in the Index were ranked by their score, Turkey ranked 115 in 2023. For comparison with worldwide scores, the average score was 43, the best score was 90, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Eastern European and Central Asian countries was 53, the average score was 35 and the lowest score was 18.
Corruption in Lithuania describes the prevention and occurrence of corruption in Lithuania.
Corruption in Sweden has been defined as "the abuse of power" by Swedish National Council for Crime Prevention (Brå). By receiving bribes, bribe takers abuse their position of power, which is consistent with how the National Anti-Corruption Unit of the Swedish Prosecution Authority specifies the term. Although bribes and improper rewards are central in the definition of corruption in Sweden, corruption in the sense of "abuse of power" can also manifest itself in other crimes such as misuse of office, embezzlement, fraud and breach of trust against a principal.
Corruption in Denmark is amongst the lowest in the world.
Corruption in Switzerland describes the prevention and occurrence of corruption in Switzerland.
Corruption in Latvia is examined on this page.
In 2013, a report by Transparency International revealed that political parties, Parliament, the judiciary and the military are the most corrupt institutions in Portugal. Transparency International's 2022 Corruption Perceptions Index ranks the country in 33rd place out of 180 countries in the Index.
Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index scored Germany at 78 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Germany ranked 9th among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among Western European and European Union countries was 90, the average score was 65 and the lowest score was 42.
On Transparency International's 2023 Corruption Perceptions Index, Peru scored 33 on a scale from 0 to 100. When ranked by score, Peru ranked 121st among the 180 countries in the Index, where the country ranked first is perceived to have the most honest public sector. For comparison with worldwide scores, the best score was 90, the average score was 43, and the worst score was 11. For comparison with regional scores, the highest score among the countries of the Americas was 76, the average score was 43 and the lowest score was 13.
Corruption in Jordan is a social and economic issue.
Corruption is a serious and growing problem for doing business in Nicaragua.
Corruption in Bolivia is a major problem that has been called an accepted part of life in the country. It can be found at all levels of Bolivian society. Citizens of the country perceive the judiciary, police and public administration generally as the country's most corrupt. Corruption is also widespread among officials who are supposed to control the illegal drug trade and among those working in and with extractive industries.
Corruption in Ecuador is a serious problem. In 2014, the U.S. Department of State cited Ecuador's corruption as a key human-rights problem. According to Freedom House, "Ecuador has long been racked by corruption", and the weak judicial oversight and investigative resources perpetuate a culture of impunity.
Corruption in Eritrea is considered a deeply serious and growing problem. The level of corruption used to be considerably lower in Eritrea than in many other African countries. Indeed, it was traditionally viewed as having a “strong ‘anti-corruption’ culture” and considered relatively “egalitarian and corruption-free.” In 2006, a report by Bertelsmann Stiftung stated that corruption, as of that date, was not a serious problem within Eritrea. While noting that there had been “cases of corruption since independence,” they existed on a negligible level, although politically-motivated corruption allegations have been made. But, in fact, corruption is said to have been growing steadily worse ever since 1998, when, not long after the end of its decades-long war of independence, a border conflict with Ethiopia led to another war.
There is evidence that corruption is a legitimate problem in Israeli politics and many investigations have taken place into allegations of influence peddling and bribery.
Costa Rica generally has low corruption and is regarded as the least corrupt nation in Central America. Its anti-corruption laws are generally well enforced. However, there are persistent problems with high level corruption and most notably, every president who has taken office since 1990s has faced allegations of corrupt behavior.