Romania in the Early Middle Ages

Last updated

Historical regions of Romania RomaniaHistRegions.jpg
Historical regions of Romania

The Early Middle Ages in Romania started with the withdrawal of the Roman troops and administration from Dacia province in the 270s. In the next millennium a series of peoples, most of whom only controlled two or three of the nearly ten historical regions that now form Romania, arrived. During this period, society and culture underwent fundamental changes. Town life came to an end in Dacia with the Roman withdrawal, and in Scythia Minor  the other Roman province in the territory of present-day Romania 400 years later. Fine vessels made on fast potter's wheels disappeared and hand-made pottery became dominant from the 450s. Burial rites changed more than once from cremation to inhumation and vice versa until inhumation became dominant by the end of the 10th century.


The East Germanic Goths and Gepids, who lived in sedentary communities, were the first new arrivals. The Goths dominated Moldavia and Wallachia from the 290s, and parts of Transylvania from the 330s. Their power collapsed under attacks by the nomadic Huns in 376. The Huns controlled Eastern and Central Europe from around 400, but their empire disintegrated in 454. Thereafter the regions west of the Carpathian Mountains   Banat, Crişana, and Transylvania  and Oltenia were dominated by the Gepids. Within a century, the lands east of the mountains became important centers of the Antes and Sclavenes. Hydronyms and place names of Slavic origin also prove the one-time presence of Early Slavs in the regions west of the Carpathians.

The nomadic Avars subjugated the Gepids in 568 and dominated the Carpathian Basin up until around 800. The Bulgars also established a powerful empire in the 670s which included Dobruja and other territories along the Lower Danube. Bulgaria officially adopted the Eastern Orthodox variant of Christianity in 864. An armed conflict between Bulgaria and the nomadic Hungarians forced the latter to depart from the Pontic steppes and began the conquest of the Carpathian Basin around 895. Their invasion gave rise to the earliest reference, recorded some centuries later in the Gesta Hungarorum , to a polity ruled by a Romanian duke named Gelou. The same source also makes mention of the presence of the Székelys in Crişana around 895. The first contemporaneous references to Romanians who used to be known as Vlachs  in the regions now forming Romania were recorded in the 12th and 13th centuries. References to Vlachs inhabiting the lands to the south of the Lower Danube abound in the same period.

Banat, Crişana, and Transylvania were integrated into the Kingdom of Hungary in the 11th century. These regions were subject to plundering raids by the nomadic Pechenegs and Cumans, who dominated the lowlands east of the mountains. Hungarian monarchs promoted the immigration of Western European colonists to Transylvania from the 1150s. The colonists' descendants, who were known as Transylvanian Saxons from the early 13th century, received collective privileges in 1224. Because of the settlement of the Saxons in their former territories, the Székelys were moved to the easternmost zones of the kingdom. The emergence of the Mongol Empire in the Eurasian Steppes in the first decades of the 13th century had lasting effects on the history of the region. The Mongols subjugated the Cumans in the 1230s and destroyed many settlements throughout the Kingdom of Hungary in 1241 and 1242, bringing the Early Middle Ages to an end.


Roman provinces and native tribes

Roman provinces in the regions now forming Romania in the 2nd century AD Roman province of Dacia (106 - 271 AD).svg
Roman provinces in the regions now forming Romania in the 2nd century AD

Contacts between the Roman Empire which developed into the largest empire in the history of Europe   [1] and the natives of the regions now forming Romania commenced in the 2nd century BC. [2] These regions were inhabited by Dacians, Bastarnae and other peoples [3] whose incursions posed a threat to the empire. [4] The Romans initially attempted to secure their frontiers by various means, including the creation of buffer zones. [4] Finally, they decided that the annexation of the lands of these fierce "barbarians" was the best measure. [5] The territory of the Getae between the river Danube and the Black Sea (modern Dobruja) was the first region to be incorporated into the empire. [6] It was attached to the Roman province of Moesia in 46 AD. [6]

The Lower Danube marked the boundary between the empire and "Barbaricum" [7] until Emperor Trajan decided to expand the frontiers over territories controlled by the Dacian Kingdom. [8] He achieved his goal through two military campaigns, the second of which ended with the annihilation of the Dacian state and the establishment of the province of Dacia in 106. [9] [10] It included Oltenia and large portions of Banat, Transylvania, and Wallachia. [11] Many colonists "from all over the Roman world" [12] arrived and settled in the new province in the following decades. [13] [14]

Dacia was situated over the empire's natural borders. [15] It was surrounded by native tribes inhabiting the regions of Crișana, Maramureș, and Moldavia, which are now integral part of Romania, but were never annexed by the Romans. [13] Dacia province was plundered by neighboring tribes, including the Carpians and Sarmatians from the 230s, and by the Goths from the 250s. [16] [17] [18] As the frontiers were to be shortened for defensive purposes, [19] the withdrawal of the Roman legions from Dacia began in the 260s. [20] The province officially ceased to exist under Emperor Aurelian (270275) [21] who "withdrew the Romans from the cities and countryside of Dacia". [22] [23] Garrisons stationed in Drobeta and Sucidava remained on the northern bank of the river. [24]

Origin of the Romanians

The "Jirecek Line" Bgiusca Jirecek Line.jpg
The "Jireček Line"

Romanians speak a language originating from the dialects of the Roman provinces north of the "Jireček Line". [25] This line divided, in Roman times, the predominantly Greek-speaking southern provinces from those where Latin was the principal language of communication. [26] The emergence of Proto-Romanian from Vulgar Latin is first demonstrated by the words "torna, torna, frater" ("turn around, turn around, brother") recorded in connection with an Eastern Roman military action in 587 or 588. [27] [28] The soldier shouting them "in his native tongue" [29] spoke an Eastern Romance dialect of the Balkan Mountains. [30]

Grigore Nandris writes that the Romanian vocabulary suggests that the Romanians' ancestors were "reduced to a pastoral life in the mountains and to agricultural pursuits in the foothills of their pasture lands" following the collapse of the Roman rule. [31] A great number of Romanian words of uncertain origin [32] are related to animal husbandry: baci ("chief shepherd"), balegă ("dung"), and brânză ("cheese"), for instance, belong to this group. [33] Many words related to a more settled form of animal husbandry were borrowed from Slavic, including coteţ ("poultry house"), grajd ("stable"), and stână ("fenced pasture"). [34] [35] Romanian has preserved Latin terms for agriculture [36] and the Latin names of certain crops, but a significant part of its agricultural lexis originates from a Slavic-speaking population. [34] [37] The first group includes a ara ("to plough"), a semăna ("to sow"), a culege ("to harvest"), a secera ("to reap"), grâu ("wheat"), in ("flax"), and furcă ("pitchfork"), while a croi ("to cut out"), a plivi ("to weed"), brazdă ("furrow"), cobilă ("plow line"), coasă ("scythe"), lopată ("shovel") and many others are Slavic loanwords. [34] [38]

The Romanian religious vocabulary is also divided, with a small number of basic terms preserved from Latin [36] and a significant number of borrowings from Old Church Slavonic. [39] Romanian did not preserve Latin words connected to urbanized society. [40] Likewise, the term sat ("village") may have been borrowed from the Albanian language and not directly inherited. [41] The Medieval Romanian word obște ("village community") came from Slavic, [42] and the Romanian word for its boundaries (hotar) is of Hungarian origin. [43] [44]

The Romanians' ethnogenesis cannot be understood based exclusively on written sources, because the earliest records on their ancestors were made by 11th-century Byzantine historians. [45] When referring to the Romance-speaking population of Southeastern Europe, early medieval sources used the Vlach exonym or its cognates, which all derived from the Common Slavic term for speakers of the Latin language. [46] [47] The earliest sources write of the Vlachs of the central territories of the Balkan Peninsula. [46] [47]

Late Roman Age

Scythia Minor and the limes on the Lower Danube (c. 270c. 700)

Scythia Minor: a Late Roman province formed through the division of the former province of Lower Moesia around 293 Scythia Minor map.jpg
Scythia Minor: a Late Roman province formed through the division of the former province of Lower Moesia around 293

The territory between the Lower Danube and the Black Sea remained a fully integrated part of the Roman Empire, even after the abandonment of Trajan's Dacia. [48] It was transformed into a separate province under the name of Scythia Minor [49] around 293. [50] Before 300, the Romans erected small forts at Dierna and in other places on the northern bank of the Danube in modern-day Banat. [51] [52] In their wider region, Roman coins from the periodmostly of bronzehave been found. [53]

The existence of Christian communities in Scythia Minor became evident under Emperor Diocletian (284305). [54] He and his co-emperors ordered the persecution of Christians throughout the empire, causing the death of many between 303 and 313. [54] [55] Under Emperor Constantine the Great (306337), a bridge across the Danube was constructed at Sucidava, a new fort (Constantiana Daphne) was built, and ancient roads were repaired in Oltenia. [56] [57] The Lower Danube again became the empire's northern boundary in 369 at the latest, when Emperor Valens met Athanaric the head of the Gothsin a boat in the middle of the river because the latter had taken an oath "never to set foot on Roman soil". [58] [59]

The Huns destroyed Drobeta and Sucidava in the 440s, but the forts were restored under Emperor Justinian I (527565). [60] Eastern Roman coins from the first half of the 6th century suggest a significant military presence in Olteniaa region also characterized by the predominance of pottery with shapes of Roman tradition. [61] Although Eastern Roman emperors made annual payments to the neighboring peoples in an attempt to keep the peace in the Balkans, the Avars regularly invaded Scythia Minor from the 580s. [62] The Romans abandoned Sucidava in 596 or 597, [63] but Tomis, which was the last town in Scythia Minor to resist the invaders, only fell in 704. [64]

North of the limes (c. 270c. 330)

Transylvania and northern Banat, which had belonged to Dacia province, had no direct contact with the Roman Empire from the 270s. [65] There is no evidence that they were invaded in the following decades. [66] Towns, including Apulum and Ulpia Traiana Sarmizegetusa, and the surrounding areas [66] continued to be inhabited but the urban areas diminished. [67] The existence of local Christian communities can be assumed in Porolissum, Potaissa and other settlements. [68] On the other hand, evidence mainly pottery with "Chi-rho" (Χ-Ρ) signs and other Christian symbols is "shadowy and poorly understood", according to archaeologists Haynes and Hanson. [69]

Urns found in late 3rd-century cemeteries at Bezid, Mediaş, and in other Transylvanian settlements had clear analogies in sites east of the Carpathians, suggesting that the Carpians were the first new arrivals in the former province from the neighboring regions. [51] [70] Other Carpian groups, pressured by the Goths, also departed from their homeland and sought refuge in the Roman Empire around 300. [71] Nevertheless, "Carpo-Dacians" were listed among the peoples "mixed with the Huns" [72] as late as 379. [73] [74] The Sarmatians of the Banat [51] were allies of the empire, demonstrated by a Roman invasion in 332 against the Goths, their enemies. [75] [57] Sarmatians were admitted into the empire in 379, but other Sarmatian groups remained in the Tisa plains up until the 460s. [76] [77]

Gutthiuda: land of the Goths (c. 290c. 455)

Gutthiuda, the country of Thervingi Gutthiuda.jpg
Gutthiuda, the country of Thervingi

The Goths started penetrating into territories west of the river Dniester from the 230s. [78] [79] Two distinct groups separated by the river, the Thervingi and the Greuthungi, quickly emerged among them. [80] The one-time province of Dacia was held by "the Taifali, Victohali, and Thervingi" [81] around 350. [19] [82]

The Goths' success is marked by the expansion of the multiethnic "Sântana de Mureş-Chernyakhov culture". [19] Settlements of the culture appeared in Moldavia and Wallachia at the end of the 3rd century, [83] and in Transylvania after 330. [57] These lands were inhabited by a sedentary population engaged in farming and cattle-breeding. [30] Pottery, comb-making and other handicrafts flourished in the villages. [84] Wheel-made fine pottery is a typical item of the period; hand-formed cups of the local tradition were also preserved. [85] [86] Plowshares similar to those made in nearby Roman provinces and Scandinavian-style brooches indicate trade contacts with these regions. [87] "Sântana de Mureş-Chernyakhov" villages, sometimes covering an area exceeding 20 hectares (49 acres), were not fortified [88] and consisted of two types of houses: sunken huts with walls made of wattle and daub and surface buildings with plastered timber walls. [88] Sunken huts had for centuries been typical for settlements east of the Carpathians, [89] but now they appeared in distant zones of the Pontic steppes. [90]

Pieces of the Pietroasele Treasure Tezaur MNIR IMG 7326.JPG
Pieces of the Pietroasele Treasure

The multiethnic Gutthiuda was divided into smaller political units or kuni, each headed by tribal chiefs or reiks. [91] In case of emergency, the tribal chiefs' council elected a supreme leader who was known as iudex regum ("judge of kings") [92] by St Ambrose. [93] Christian prisoners of war were the first missionaries among the Goths. [94] Ulfilas, himself a descendant of a Cappadocian captive, was ordained bishop "of the Christians in the land of the Goths" [95] in 341. [94] [96] Expelled from Gutthiuda during a persecution of Christians, Ulfilas settled in Moesia in 348. [97]

Gothic dominance collapsed when the Huns arrived [98] and attacked the Thervingi in 376. [99] Most of the Thervingi sought asylum in the Roman Empire, [100] and were followed by large groups of Greuthungi and Taifali. [77] All the same, significant groups of Goths stayed in the territories north of the Danube. [101] For instance, Athanaric "retired with all his men to Caucalanda "probably to the valley of the river Olt from where they "drove out the Sarmatians". [102] [103] A hoard of Roman coins issued under Valentinian I and Valens suggests that the gates of the amphitheatre at Ulpia Traiana were blocked around the same time. [104] The Pietroasele Treasure which was hidden around 450 also implies the presence of a Gothic tribal or religious leader in the lands between the Carpathians and the Lower Danube. [105] It contains a torc bearing the inscription GUTANI O WI HAILAG, which is interpreted by Malcolm Todd as "God who protects the Goths, most holy and inviolate". [106]

Gepidia: land of the Gepids (c. 290c. 630)

Gepidia at its largest territorial extent Gepid kingdom 6th century.png
Gepidia at its largest territorial extent

The earliest reference to Gepids an East Germanic tribe closely related to the Goths is found in a formal speech of 291. [107] [108] The anonymous author wrote that the Thervingi joined "battle with the Vandals and Gepids" [109] at that time. [110] The center of an early Gepidia, on the plains northwest of the Meseş Mountains, appears to have been located around Şimleu Silvaniei, where early 5th-century precious objects of Roman provenance have been unearthed. [111] [112]

The Huns imposed their authority over the Gepids by the 420s, [112] but the latter remained united under the rule of their king named Ardaric. [113] Although he was one of the favorites of Attila, king of the Huns, [114] he initiated an uprising against the Huns when Attila died in 453. [115] [116] The Gepids regained their independence [117] and "ruled as victors over the extent of all Dacia". [118] [119]

Golden ring with crosses found at Apahida Necropolis Tesoro di principe gepidico di apahida (1889), anello con 4 croci, 480-500 ca..JPG
Golden ring with crosses found at Apahida Necropolis

Three sumptuous tombs found at Apahida evidence the wealth accumulated by Gepid royals through their connections with the Eastern Roman Empire. [120] [116] A golden ring with crosses found in one of the graves implies its owner's Christian faith. [121] John of Biclar refers to an Arian bishop of the Gepids which suggests that they adopted Christianity through their connection with the Arian Goths. [122]

New settlements appearing along the rivers Mureş, Someş, and Târnava reflects a period of tranquility in Gepidia until around 568. [123] The common people in Biharia, Cenad, Moreşti, and other villages lived in sunken huts covered with gabled roofs but with no hearths or ovens. [124] [125] They were primarily farmers, but looms, combs, and other products evidence the existence of local workshops. [123] Trading contacts between Gepidia and faraway regions is evidenced by finds of amber beads and brooches manufactured in the Crimea, Mazovia or Scandinavia. [126]

The Avar invasion of 568 ended the independent Gepidia. [127] Written sources evidence the survival of Gepid groups within the Avar Empire. [128] For instance, Eastern Roman troops "encountered three Gepid settlements" [129] on the Tisa plains in 599 or 600. [130] [128]

Hunnic Empire (c. 400c. 460)

The Hunnic Empire around 450 Huns450.png
The Hunnic Empire around 450

The Huns, a people of uncertain origin, [131] were nomadic and wandered "with the wagons" [132] in the 370s. [133] They were eminent mounted archers who imposed their authority over an increasing number of neighboring peoples. [134] [135] Their first ruler whose seat was located in the Lower Danube region was Uldin, initially an important ally and later an enemy of the Eastern Roman Empire between 401 and 408. [136] [137]

The Eastern Roman government paid an annual tribute to the Huns from the 420s. [138] [139] Gold flowing from the empire transformed the Hun society. [140] The introduction of a centralized monarchy is evidenced in a report written by Priscus of Panium, an Eastern Roman envoy sent to the ruler of the Huns, Attila, in 448. [141] At that time, Gothic was widely spoken in the royal court since "the subjects of the Huns" spoke "besides their own barbarous tongues, either Hunnic or Gothic, oras many as have commercial dealings with the western Romans Latin". [140] [142]

The Huns imposed their authority on a sedentary population. [143] Priscus of Panium refers to a village where he and his retinue were supplied "with millet instead of corn" and "medos (mead) instead of wine". [142] [144] Attila's sudden death in 453 [145] caused a civil war among his sons. [146] The subject peoples revolted and emerged the victors at the Battle of Nedao in 454. [115] [147] The remnants of the Huns withdrew to the Pontic steppes. [148] One of their groups was admitted to settle in Scythia Minor in 460. [149]

After the first migrations

Between Huns and Avars (c. 450c. 565)

The last "Sântana de Mureş-Chernyakhov" objects once widespread in Gutthiuda such as fine wares and weapons are dated to the period ending around 430. [150] According to Coriolan H. Opreanu, the same period is characterized by "population shifts" which caused the abandonment of many villages and the appearance of new settlements. [151] Botoşana, Dodeşti, and other sites east of the Carpathians demonstrate the simplification of pottery forms and a decline in the use of the fast potter's wheel from the 450s. [152] Around the same time, semi-sunken huts with stone or clay ovens appeared in Moldavia and Wallachia, [153] [154] [155] forming ephemeral settlements with an area smaller than 5 hectares (12 acres). [156] The locals practiced an "itinerant form of agriculture", instead of manuring the soil. [156] Differences in local pottery indicate the coexistence of communities isolated from each other by marshes, forests or hills. [157] For instance, contemporary Cândeşti produced a significant quantity of wheel-made pottery, Târgşor was characterized by crushed-shard tempered vessels, and a sample of the most common "Kolochin" vessels was found in the Budureasca Valley. [158]

There are few known cemeteries from the second half of the 5th century, [159] pointing to common use of cremation without the use of urns or pits. [160] On the other hand, a huge biritual necropolis at Sărata-Monteoru produced more than 1,600 cremation burials, either in wheel-made urns or in pits without urns. [161] [162] Small cemeteries with inhumation graves have been found at Nichiteni and Secuieni. [159]

Expansion of the Antes and Sclavenes in the 6th century Slavic peoples 6th century historical map.jpg
Expansion of the Antes and Sclavenes in the 6th century

Jordanes, Procopius and other 6th-century authors used the terms "Sclavenes" and "Antes" to refer to the peoples inhabiting the territory north of the Lower Danube. [163] The Antes launched their first campaign over the Lower Danube in 518. [164] After they concluded a treaty with the Eastern Roman Empire in 545, the Sclavenes started to plunder the Balkan provinces. [165] Both ethnic groups seized many prisoners of wars during their raids, but they were ready to integrate them "as free men and friends". [166] [167]

The names of early 6th-century leaders of the Sclavenes or Antes are unknown. [168] This supports ancient authors' claims that both ethnic groups lived "under a democracy". [169] [170] The same conclusion can be drawn from Procopius's report of the "phoney Chilbudius" a young Antian serf who "spoke the Latin tongue" [171]  who was dispatched by his fellow tribesmen to negotiate with the Eastern Roman Empire in 545. [172]

The disappearance of bronze and gold coins from sites north of the Lower Danube demonstrates an "economic closure of the frontier" of the Eastern Roman Empire between 545 and 565. [173] [174] The same period is characterized by a tendency towards cultural unification in Moldavia, Oltenia and Wallachia. [175] Handmade pots with very similar incised designs evidence the "existence of a cross-regional set of symbols shared" by either potters or consumers. [176] Pots, spindle whorls and other objects decorated with crosses or swastikas have been unearthed at Cândeşti, Lozna, and other sites. [158] [177] The use of handmade clay pans for baking bread was spreading from the regions south and east of the Carpathians towards lands over the Dniester and the Lower Danube. [178]

Avar Empire (c. 565c. 800)

The Avars occupied Gepidia in 567, less than a decade after their arrival in Europe. [179] [180] They were nomadic pastoralists, [181] who settled in the lowlands. [182] Stirrups found at Sânpetru German are among the earliest finds in Romania attributed to the Avars. [183] They received agricultural products from farming communities settled in their domains and neighboring peoples subjected to their authority. [184] Emperor Justin II hired, in 578, the Avars to attack the Sclavenes [185] who resumed their plundering raids against the empire around that time. [186] The names of some of the Sclavene leaders were first recorded in the following period. [187] One of them, Musocius, "was called rex in the barbarian tongue". [188] [189]

Graves of males interred together with horses found at Aiud and Band prove the Avars' settlement in Transylvania in the early 7th century. [183] Their cemeteries are centered around salt mines. [190] Spursnever found in Avar context but widely used in Western Slav territories [191] were unearthed in Şura Mică and Medişoru Mare, suggesting the employment of non-Avar horsemen in the 8th century. [192]

Large "Late Avar" cemeteries used by several generations between c. 700 and c. 800 imply "an advanced degree of sedentization" of the entire society. [193] The Avar Empire collapsed after the Franks launched three campaigns against the westernmost Avar territories between 791 and 803. [181] Soon afterwards the Bulgars attacked the Avars from the southeast, [194] and Charlemagne settled Avar groups in Pannonia. [194]

Emergence of new powers (c. 600c. 895)

The Lower Danube region experienced a period of stability after the establishment of the Avar Empire. [195] Archaeological sites in Moldavia, Oltenia and Wallachia became characterized by the growing popularity of hand-made vessels with finger impressions [196] and by a decline in detectable cemeteries. [197] Ananias of Shirak, a 7th-century Armenian geographer described the "large country of Dacia" as inhabited by Slavs who formed "twenty-five tribes". [198] [199] [200]

The ethnic distribution in the territory of present-day Romania and neighboring areas in the 8th century, according to Matjaz Klemencic and Mitja Zagar 20100217005035!A view on 6th to 8th cent.jpg
The ethnic distribution in the territory of present-day Romania and neighboring areas in the 8th century, according to Matjaž Klemenčič and Mitja Žagar

Villages of sunken huts with stone ovens [153] appeared in Transylvania around 600. [201] [202] [203] Their network was expanding along the rivers Mureş, Olt and Someş. [201] [202] The so-called "Mediaş group" of cremation or mixed cemeteries emerged in this period near salt mines. [204] The Hungarian and the Romanian vocabulary of salt mining was taken from Slavic, suggesting that Slavs were employed in the mines for centuries. [205] [206] Bistriţa ("swift"), Crasna ("nice" or "red"), Sibiu ("dogwood"), and many other rivers and settlements with names of Slavic origin also evidence the presence of Slavs in Transylvania. [207] [208]

The Turkic-speaking Bulgars arrived in the territories west of the river Dniester around 670. [209] [210] [211] At the Battle of Ongal they defeated the Eastern Roman (or Byzantine) Emperor Constantine IV in 680 or 681, occupied Dobruja and founded the First Bulgarian Empire. [212] [213] They soon imposed their authority over some of the neighboring tribes. [214] [215] The great variety in burial rites evidences the multi-ethnic character of the Bulgarian Empire. [216] Even the Bulgars were divided in this respect; some of them practiced inhumation and others cremation. [217] Initially, a sharp distinction existed between the Bulgars and their subjects, but the Slavicization of the Bulgars soon began. [218]

Opreanu writes that the "new cultural synthesis" known as the "Dridu culture" developed in the Lower Danube region around 680. [219] [220] New settlements [221] and large cemeteries show that the region experienced a steady demographic rise in the 8th century. [222] The large, unfortified "Dridu" settlements were characterized by traditional semi-sunken huts, but a few houses with ground-level floors have also been unearthed in Dodeşti, Spinoasa, and other places. [223]

9th-11th-century ceramics and objects from Alba Iulia area, in display at the National Museum of the Union Alba Iulia National Museum of the Union 2011 - Native Ceramics and Objects from Alba Iulia Area, 9th-11th Century AD.JPG
9th-11th-century ceramics and objects from Alba Iulia area, in display at the National Museum of the Union
Omurtag orders the persecution of Christians in his empire KoutragonChristiansBGhistory.jpg
Omurtag orders the persecution of Christians in his empire

"Dridu" communities produced and used gray or yellow fine pottery, [224] but hand-made vessels were still predominant. [225] Fine, gray vessels were also unearthed in the 9th-century "Blandiana A" [226] cemeteries in the area of Alba-Iulia, which constitutes a "cultural enclave" in Transylvania. [227] [228] Near these cemeteries, necropolises of graves with westeast orientation form the distinct "Ciumbrud group". [229] [226] [230] Female dress accessories from "Ciumbrud graves" are strikingly similar to those from Christian cemeteries in Bulgaria and Moravia. [229] [230] From an earlier date are the cremation cemeteries of the "Nuşfalau-Someşeni group" in northwestern Transylvania, with their 8th- and 9th-century tumuli , [201] [231] [232] similar to the kurgans of East Slavic territories. [203]

Contemporaneous authors rarely dwelled on early medieval Southeastern Europe. [233] For instance, the Royal Frankish Annals makes a passing reference to Abodrites living "in Dacia adjacent to the Danube near the Bulgarian border" [234] on the occasion of their envoys' arrival in Aachen in 824. [235] Bulgaria's territory increased under Krum (c. 803814), [236] [237] who took Adrianople and forced at least 10,000 of the town's inhabitants to settle north of the Lower Danube in 813. [238] The ambitions of his son Omurtag (814831) in the regions of the rivers Dnieper and Tisa are attested by two columns erected in the memory of Bulgar military leaders who drowned in these rivers during military campaigns. [239] [240] Emperor Arnulf sent envoys, in 894, to the Bulgarians to "ask that they should not sell salt to the Moravians", [241] [242] [243] suggesting a Bulgarian control over either the Transylvanian salt mines [241] or the roads to Moravia. [244]

In the same year, the nomadic Hungarians who had arrived in the Lower Danube region from the steppes of Eastern Europe in 837 or 838 [245] [246]  became involved in a conflict between Bulgaria and the Byzantine Empire on the latter's behalf. [247] [248] The Bulgarians incited another nomadic tribe, the Pechenegs, to invade the Hungarians from the east, while the Bulgarians also attacked them from the south. [241] The two synchronized attacks forced the Hungarians to cross the Carpathian Mountains in search for a new homeland. [241]

The Carpathian Basin on the eve of the "Hungarian Land-taking": a map based primarily on the narration of the Gesta Hungarorum Gesta hungarorum map.jpg
The Carpathian Basin on the eve of the "Hungarian Land-taking": a map based primarily on the narration of the Gesta Hungarorum

About 300 years later, Anonymus, the author of Gesta Hungarorum , wrote a comprehensive list of polities and peoples of the Carpathian Basin at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. [249] He wrote about the Hungarian conquest of the territory but did not mention Simeon I of Bulgaria, Svatopluk of Moravia and the conquerors' opponents known from contemporary sources. [249] Instead, he wrote of a number of personalities unknown by other chroniclers. [249] [250] In Gesta Hungarorum, Menumorut ruled over "the peoples that are called Kozár" [251] in Crişana. [249] [252] Anonymus also wrote of the Székelys ("previously the peoples of King Attila") [253] living in the territory for centuries who joined the invading Hungarians. [254] Banat, according to Anonymus, was ruled by Glad who had come "from the castle of Vidin." [251] [255] Glad is described to employ "Cumans, Bulgarians and Vlachs" [256] in his army. [255] Anonymous also wrote of Gelou, "a certain Vlach" [257] ruling in Transylvania, a land inhabited by "Vlachs and Slavs". [255] [258] Gelou's subjects are portrayed as having "suffered many injuries from the Cumans and Pechenegs". [259] [257]

Formation of new states and the last waves of migrations

First Bulgarian Empire after conversion (8641018)

Boris I, the ruler of Bulgaria, converted to Orthodox Christianity in 864. [260] [261] He promoted vernacular worship services, thus Old Church Slavonic was declared the language of liturgy in the Bulgarian Orthodox Church in 893. [262] One of the earliest examples of Cyrillic script an alphabet strongly associated with Slavonic liturgywas found in Mircea Vodă in Romania. [263] The Cyrillic inscription from 943 refers to a " župan Dimitrie". [264]

Byzantine troops occupied large portions of Bulgaria, including modern Dobruja, under Emperor John I Tzimiskes (969976). [265] After his death an anti-Byzantine uprising led by four brothers broke out. [266] [265] One of the brothers, David, was killed by Vlachs in the present-day border region between Greece and North Macedonia. [267] In 1018, the Byzantines conquered the whole territory of the Bulgarian Empire [268] and the Archbishop of Ohrid acquired ecclesiastic jurisdiction in 1020 over the Vlachs living there. [269] [270]

Hungarians in the Carpathian Basin (c. 895c. 1000)

The Hungarian Conquest depicted in the Illuminated Chronicle Chronicon Pictum P21.jpg
The Hungarian Conquest depicted in the Illuminated Chronicle

The way taken by the Hungarians across the Carpathian Mountains when they started the conquest of the Carpathian Basin varies from source to source. [271] According to Gesta Hungarorum, the Hungarians descended through the northern passes to the lowlands, bypassing Transylvania, [272] [273] and only began the invasion of the regions east of the Tisa after the conquest of the western regions. [274] Gesta Hungarorum says the Vlach Gelou of Transylvania died fighting the Hungarians, [275] while his subjects chose "for themselves as lord Tétény", [276] one of the Hungarian leaders. [277] Anonymus also wrote of Menumorut's defeat, but said he preserved his rule in Crişana until his death by giving his daughter in marriage to Zolta, heir to Árpád, the head of the Hungarians. [275] [273] In a contrasting account, the Illuminated Chronicle writes of Hungarians fleeing through the eastern passes of the Carpathian Mountains to Transylvania [273] where they "remained quietly" and "rested their herds" [278] for a while before moving further west. [279] The so-called "Cluj group" [226] of small inhumation cemeteriesgraves with westeast orientation, often containing remains of horses [280] appeared on both sides of the Apuseni Mountains around 900. [281] Their military character evidences that the people using them formed a "double defensive line" organized against the Pechenegs. [281] Transylvanian cemeteries of the "Cluj group" cluster around salt mines. [190]

Emperor Constantine VII Porphyrogenitus identified "the whole settlement" [282] of Hungary with the lands where the rivers Criş, Mureş, Timiş, Tisa and Toutispossibly the Bega ran around 950. [279] The concentration of objects of Byzantine provenance at the confluence of the Mureş and Tisa shows that this territory was a regional center of power. [283] Accordingly, the seat of Gyula, a Hungarian chieftain baptized in Constantinople around 952, most probably existed in this region. [284] On the other hand, Hungarian chronicles associate Gyula's family with Transylvania. [285] Place names from the nomadic stratum of Hungarian toponymythose corresponding to proper names or Hungarian tribal names, including Decea, Hotoan, and Ineu [286] also evidence that major Hungarian groups settled in Transylvania from the 950s. [287] [288] An early "Bijelo Brdo" cemetery belonging to a 10th- and 11th-century archaeological culture with finds from all over the Carpathian Basin was found at Deva. [289]

Patzinakia: land of the Pechenegs (c. 895c. 1120)

Patzinakia at the end of the 11th century Southeast Europe 1092.jpg
Patzinakia at the end of the 11th century

The Turkic-speaking [247] Pechenegs took the control of the territories east of the Carpathians from the Hungarians around 895. [290] [291] Emperor Constantine VII wrote that two Pecheneg "provinces" or "clans" ("Kato Gyla" and "Giazichopon") [292] were located in Moldavia and Wallachia around 950. [293] The change of dominion had no major effect on the sedentary "Dridu" [294] villages in the region. [295] The settlements in Moldavia and Wallachia, most of them built on river banks or lake shores, remained unfortified. [296] Sporadic finds of horse brasses and other "nomadic" objects evidence the presence of Pechenegs in "Dridu" communities. [297] Snaffle bits with rigid mouthpieces and round stirrupsnovelties of the early 10th centurywere also unearthed in Moldavia and Wallachia. [298] Cemeteries of the locals show that inhumation replaced cremation by the end of the 10th century. [299]

The Eymund's saga narrates that Pechenegs (Tyrkir) with Blökumen "and a good many other nasty people" [300] were involved in the disputes for the throne of Kievan Rus' in 1019. [301] An 11th-century runic inscription on a stone from Gotland narrates that a Varangian man was murdered "on a voyage abroad" by Blakumen . [302] [303] [304] Both Blökumen and Blakumen may refer to Vlachs inhabiting the regions east of the Carpathians, [305] although their translation to "black men" cannot be excluded. [306] Graffiti depicting ships and dragons in Scandinavian style were found in the Basarabi Cave Complex at Murfatlar. [307]

Large groups of Pechenegs pressured from the east by the Ouzes received asylum in the Byzantine Empire in 1046 and 1047. [308] All the same, Pecheneg populations remained in the regions north of the Lower Danube even thereafter. [309] Some of them were admitted into the Kingdom of Hungary in the next decades, where they were settled in southern Transylvania and other regions. [310]

Byzantine revival and the Second Bulgarian Empire (970sc. 1185)

A pendant discovered at the Byzantine fortress from Pacuiul lui Soare PacuiulLuiSoareConstanta.JPG
A pendant discovered at the Byzantine fortress from Păcuiul lui Soare

Around 971, Emperor John I Tzimiskes established the theme or "district" of Paristrion in the territories occupied between the Balkan Mountains and the Lower Danube. [311] [312] Naval bases were built at Capidava, Noviodunum, and Păcuiul lui Soare on the river. [313] Bulgarians and Vlachs living in the annexed territories often expressed their hostility towards imperial rule. [314] Anna Comnena relates how local Vlachs showed "the way through the passes" [315] of the Balkan Mountains to invading Cumans in 1094. [316] All the same, Vlachs served in the imperial army, [317] for instance during an imperial campaign against the Kingdom of Hungary in 1166. [318] New taxes imposed by imperial authorities caused a rebellion of Vlachs and Bulgarians in 1185, [319] which led to the establishment of the Second Bulgarian Empire. [320] The Vlachs' eminent status within the new state is evidenced by the writings of Robert of Clari and other western authors, [321] who refer either to the new state or to its mountainous regions as "Vlachia" until the 1250s. [321]

Kingdom of Hungary (c. 10001241)

The Kingdom of Hungary at the end of the 11th century Hungary 11th cent.png
The Kingdom of Hungary at the end of the 11th century

Stephen I, the first crowned king of Hungary whose reign began in 1000 or 1001, unified the Carpathian Basin. [322] Around 1003, he launched a campaign against "his maternal uncle, King Gyula" and occupied Transylvania. [323] [324] Stephen I later turned against Ahtum, "who had been baptised in the Orthodox faith in Vidin", and conquered Banat. [325] Hartvik, Stephen I's hagiographer, wrote that the monarch "divided his territories in ten bishoprics". [326] [327] In the territory of modern Romania, three Roman Catholic dioceses were established with their seats in Alba Iulia, Biharea (from the last decades of the 11th century in Oradea), and Cenad. [328]

Royal administration in the entire kingdom was based on counties organized around royal fortresses. [329] In modern Romania's territory, references to an ispán or count of Alba [330] in 1097, and to a count of Bihor in 1111 evidence the appearance of the county system. [331] The counties in Banat and Crişana remained under direct royal authority, but a great officer of the realm, the voivode , supervised the ispáns of the Transylvanian counties from the end of the 12th century. [332]

Eastward expansion of "Bijelo Brdo" villages along the Mureş continued in the 11th century. [289] Cauldrons and huts with hearths carved into the soil were the characterizing items of the period. [333] Nevertheless, semi-sunken huts with stone ovens from Sfântu Gheorghe, Şimoneşti and other villages evidence the survival of the local population. [333] The lands between the Carpathians and the Tisa were plundered by Pechenegs in the 1010s [334] and in 1068, by Ouzes in 1085, [335] and by Cumans in 1091. [336] Cluj, Dăbâca and other royal forts built of earth and timber were strengthened after the 1068 attack. [337] In these forts appeared the so-called "Citfalău cemeteries", dependent upon late 11th-century royal legislation forcing commoners to set up their graveyards around churches. [338]

The early presence of Székelys at Tileagd in Crişana, and at Gârbova, Saschiz, and Sebeş in Transylvania is attested by royal charters. [339] Székely groups from Gârbova, Saschiz, and Sebeş were moved around 1150 into the easternmost regions of Transylvania, when the monarchs granted these territories to new settlers arriving from Western Europe. [340] The Székelys were organized into "seats" instead of counties, [341] and a royal officer, the "Count of the Székelys" became the head of their community from the 1220s. [342] The Székelys provided military services to the monarchs and remained exempt of royal taxes. [343]

Ruins of the Cistercian Abbey at Carta Carta dec2004 039.jpg
Ruins of the Cistercian Abbey at Cârța

A great number of Flemish, German, and Walloon "guest settlers" arrived in Transylvania around 1150. [344] Wheel-made fine vessels with analogies in Thuringia found at Şelimbăr demonstrate the advanced technology they introduced to their new home. [345] An account of royal revenues from the 1190s shows that almost one-tenth of all royal income derived from taxes they paid. [346] In 1224, King Andrew II granted collective privileges to those inhabiting the region between Orăștie and Baraolt. [347] The Diploma Andreanum confirmed the custom of freely electing their priests and local leaders; only the right to appoint the head of their community, the "Count of Sibiu", was preserved for the monarchs. [348] The Transylvanian Saxonsas they were collectively mentioned from the early 13th century [345] —also received the right to "use the forests of the Romanians and the Pechenegs" along with these peoples. [348]

The earliest royal charter referring to Romanians in Transylvania is connected to the foundation of the Cistercian abbey at Cârța around 1202, [349] which was granted land, up to that time possessed by Romanians. [350] Another royal charter reveals that Romanians fought for Bulgaria along with Saxons, Székelys and Pechenegs under the leadership of the Count of Sibiu in 1210. [351] The Orthodox Romanians remained exempt from the tithe payable by all Catholic peasants to the Church. [352] Furthermore, they only paid a special in kind tax, the "fiftieth" on their herds. [352]

Colonization continued with the arrival of the Teutonic Knights in Ţara Bârsei in 1211. [353] They were granted the right to freely pass through "the land of the Székelys and the land of the Vlachs" in 1222. [350] The knights tried to free themselves from the monarch's authority, thus King Andrew II expelled them from the region in 1225. [354] Thereafter, the king appointed his heir, Béla, [355] with the title of duke, to administer Transylvania. [356] [357] Duke Béla occupied Oltenia and set up a new province, the Banate of Severin, in the 1230s. [356] [357]

Cumania: land of the Cumans (c. 10601241)

Cuman stone statue from the 11th century in Luhansk, Ukraine Baba 0084.JPG
Cuman stone statue from the 11th century in Luhansk, Ukraine

The arrival of the Cumans in the Lower Danube region was first recorded in 1055. [358] A 17th-century version of the Turkic chronicle Oghuzname [359] relates that Quipchaq, the ancient Cuman hero, fought against the Ulak (Romanians), along with other nations. [309] Cuman groups assisted the rebelling Bulgarians and Vlachs against the Byzantines between 1186 and 1197. [360]

"Dridu" villages of the lowlands east of the Carpathians were abandoned between 1050 and 1080, [361] around which time new settlements appeared on higher land on both banks of the Prut. [361] A sharp decrease from 300 to 35 in the number of archaeological sitessettlements, cemeteries and coin hordsevidences a population decline which continued well into the 13th century. [362] Byzantine troops marching towards Transylvania through the territory east of the Carpathians encountered "a land entirely bereft of men" [363] in 1166. [364]

A coalition of Rus' princes and Cuman tribes suffered a sound defeat by the Mongols in the Battle of the Kalka River in 1223. [365] Shortly thereafter Boricius, a Cuman chieftain, [366] accepted baptism and the supremacy of the king of Hungary. [355] The Roman Catholic Diocese of Cumania was set up in his territories in 1228. [366] A letter of 1234 [355] written by Pope Gregory IX refers to a "certain people within the Cuman bishopric called Walati" (Vlachs) who even persuaded Catholic Hungarians and Germans to accept the ecclesiastic authority of Orthodox prelates. [367]

Mongol invasion (12411242)

The Mongol invasion of the Kingdom of Hungary depicted in Chronica Hungarorum by Johannes de Thurocz Thuroczy Tatarjaras.JPG
The Mongol invasion of the Kingdom of Hungary depicted in Chronica Hungarorum by Johannes de Thurocz

The Mongols, who had decided to invade Europe in 1235, [368] attacked the Cumans in 1238. [369] Masses of Cumans sought refuge in Bulgaria and Hungary. [370] The Mongols crossed the Carpathians in March 1241, [371] and soon afterwards they destroyed "the rich village of the Germans" (Rodna), [372] and took Bistrița, Cluj, [373] and Oradea. [371] Another Mongol army "proceeded by way of the Qara-Ulagh" ("Black Vlachs"), [374] and defeated their leader named "Mishlav". [371] [374] They also entered Transylvania, sacked Alba Iulia, Sibiu, the abbeys at Cârța and Igriș, and Cenad. [371]

The Mongol invasion lasted for a year, and the Mongols devastated huge swathes of territory of the kingdom before their unexpected withdrawal in 1242. [375] Matthew Paris and other contemporaneous scholars considered the Mongol invasion as a "sign of apocalypse". [376] [377] Whole villages were destroyed, and many were never rebuilt. [378] According to a royal charter of 1246, Alba Iulia, Harina, Gilău, Mărişelu, [379] Tășnad and Zalău were almost depopulated. [380] Another charter from 1252 evidences that Zec, [381] a village on the Olt, was totally deserted. [382]

After the devastation of the region, they [the Mongols] surrounded the great village with a combined force of some Tatars together with Russians, Cumans and their Hungarian prisoners. They sent first the Hungarian prisoners ahead and when they were all slain, the Russians, the Ishmaelites, and Cumans went into battle. The Tatars, standing behind them all at the back, laughed at their plight and ruin and killed those who retreated from the battle and subjected as many as they could to their devouring swords, so that after fighting for a week, day and night, and filling up the moat, they captured the village. Then they made the soldiers and ladies, of whom there were many, stand in a field on one side and the peasants on the other. Having robbed them of their money, clothing and other goods, they cruelly executed them with axes and swords, leaving only some of the ladies and girls alive, whom they took for their entertainment.

Master Roger's Epistle [383]


The army of Charles Robert Anjou ambushed by Basarab's army at 1330 Posada (from the Illuminated Chronicle manuscript) Viennese Illuminated Chronicle Posada.jpg
The army of Charles Robert Anjou ambushed by Basarab's army at 1330 Posada (from the Illuminated Chronicle manuscript)

A new period of intensive colonization began in Banat, Transylvania and other regions within the Kingdom of Hungary after the withdrawal of the Mongols. [384] King Béla IV was also considering settling the Knights Hospitallers in the lands between the Carpathians and the Lower Danube. [367] His diploma of 1247 for the Knights evidences the existence of four Romanian polities in the region. [385] They were under the rule of voivodes Litovoi and Seneslau, and of knezes Farcaş and John. [385]

Internal conflicts characterized the last decades of the 13th century in the Kingdom of Hungary. [386] For instance, a feud between King Béla and his son, Stephen caused a civil war which lasted from 1261 to 1266. [387] Taking advantage of the emerging anarchy, Voivode Litovoi attempted to get rid of the Hungarian monarchs' suzerainty in the 1270s, but he fell in a battle while fighting against royal troops. [388] [389] One of his successors, Basarab I of Wallachia was the first Romanian monarch whose sovereignty was internationally recognized after his victory over King Charles I of Hungary in the Battle of Posada of 1330. [389]

See also


  1. Heather 2006, p. xi.
  2. Opreanu 2005, p. 59.
  3. Bolovan et al. 1997, pp. 11-13.
  4. 1 2 Opreanu 2005, pp. 59-60.
  5. Opreanu 2005, p. 60.
  6. 1 2 Bolovan et al. 1997, pp. 28-29.
  7. Opreanu 2005, pp. 60, 67.
  8. Bolovan et al. 1997, p. 24.
  9. Georgescu 1991, p. 4.
  10. Treptow & Popa 1996, p. 87.
  11. Haynes & Hanson 2004, pp. 12, 19-21.
  12. Eutropius: Breviarium (8.6.), p. 50.
  13. 1 2 Georgescu 1991, p. 6.
  14. Haynes & Hanson 2004, pp. 15-16.
  15. Opreanu 2005, p. 102.
  16. Bolovan et al. 1997, p. 42.
  17. Tóth 1994, p. 52.
  18. Wolfram 1988, pp. 44-45.
  19. 1 2 3 Heather 2010, p. 112.
  20. Tóth 1994, p. 54.
  21. Georgescu 1991, p. 8.
  22. Eutropius: Breviarium (9.15.), p. 59.
  23. Tóth 1994, pp. 55-56.
  24. MacKendrick 1975, p. 163.
  25. Opreanu 2005, p. 128.
  26. Hall 1974, p. 70.
  27. Georgescu 1991, p. 13.
  28. Vékony 2000, pp. 206-207.
  29. The Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor (258.10-21.), p. 381.
  30. 1 2 Opreanu 2005, p. 129.
  31. Nandris 1951, p. 13.
  32. Mallinson 1998, p. 413.
  33. Spinei 2009, p. 228.
  34. 1 2 3 Kopecký, Peter (2004–2005), "Caractéristique lexicale de l'élément slave dans le vocabulaire roumain: Confrontation historique aux sédiments lexicaux turcs et grecs [=Lexical characteristics of the Slavic elements of the Romanians language: A historical comparison with the Turkic and Greek lexical layers]" (PDF), Ianua: Revista Philologica Romanica, 5: 43–53, archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-05-05
  35. Petrucci 1999, pp. 142-143.
  36. 1 2 Nandris 1951, p. 12.
  37. Spinei 2009, p. 224.
  38. Petrucci 1999, pp. 142-144.
  39. Bărbulescu 2005, pp. 142-143.
  40. Spinei 2009, p. 202.
  41. Orel 1998, p. 104.
  42. "obşte". Dicţionar explicativ al limbii române pe internet. 2004–2008. Retrieved 2012-07-28.
  43. Spinei 2009, pp. 249-250.
  44. "hotár". Dicţionar explicativ al limbii române pe internet. 2004–2008. Retrieved 2012-07-28.
  45. Georgescu 1991, pp. 8, 13.
  46. 1 2 Georgescu 1991, p. 14.
  47. 1 2 Vékony 2000, p. 209.
  48. Opreanu 2005, pp. 110-111.
  49. MacKendrick 1975, pp. 55-56, 221.
  50. Treadgold 1997, pp. 17-18.
  51. 1 2 3 Bărbulescu 2005, p. 185.
  52. Curta 2005, p. 178.
  53. Ellis 1998, pp. 231-232.
  54. 1 2 Opreanu 2005, p. 115.
  55. Treadgold 1997, p. 33.
  56. MacKendrick 1975, pp. 165, 221.
  57. 1 2 3 Wolfram 1988, p. 61.
  58. Heather 2010, pp. 72, 75.
  59. Ammianus Marcellinus: The Later Roman Empire (27.5.), p. 337.
  60. MacKendrick 1975, pp. 165-166, 222.
  61. Teodor 2005, pp. 216, 223-224.
  62. Curta 2006, pp. 54-55, 64-65.
  63. MacKendrick 1975, p. 166, 222.
  64. MacKendrick 1975, pp. 178, 222.
  65. Bărbulescu 2005, p. 181.
  66. 1 2 Haynes & Hanson 2004, p. 24.
  67. Bărbulescu 2005, p. 183.
  68. Bărbulescu 2005, pp. 186-187.
  69. Haynes & Hanson 2004, pp. 22-24.
  70. Bóna 1994, p. 65.
  71. Wolfram 1988, pp. 56-57.
  72. Zosimus (2002), The History , retrieved 18 July 2012
  73. Heather 2010, pp. 166, 660.
  74. Thompson 2001, p. 30.
  75. Heather 2010, p. 168.
  76. Heather 2006, p. 330.
  77. 1 2 Heather 2010, p. 151.
  78. Heather 2010, pp. 112, 117.
  79. Todd 2003, p. 142.
  80. Heather 2010, p. 61.
  81. Eutropius: Breviarium (8.2.), p. 48.
  82. Bóna 1994, p. 67.
  83. Heather & Matthews 1991, pp. 51-52.
  84. Heather & Matthews 1991, pp. 64, 79.
  85. Ellis 1998, p. 230.
  86. Heather & Matthews 1991, pp. 65, 79.
  87. Curta 2005, pp. 188-191.
  88. 1 2 Heather & Matthews 1991, p. 53.
  89. Heather 2010, p. 118.
  90. Heather & Matthews 1991, p. 54.
  91. Wolfram 1988, pp. 94, 96.
  92. Ambrose: On the Holy Spirit (Preface 17) , retrieved 23 July 2013
  93. Wolfram 1988, pp. 94, 416.
  94. 1 2 Todd 2003, p. 119.
  95. Philostorgius: Church History (2.5.), p. 20.
  96. Wolfram 1988, pp. 75-78.
  97. Wolfram 1988, pp. 79-80.
  98. Bóna 1994, p. 75.
  99. Thompson 2001, p. 28.
  100. Wolfram 1988, pp. 71-72.
  101. Todd 2003, p. 164.
  102. Wolfram 1988, p. 73.
  103. Ammianus Marcellinus: The Later Roman Empire (31.4.), p. 418.
  104. Bărbulescu 2005, p. 182.
  105. Todd 2003, pp. 125-126.
  106. Todd 2003, p. 126.
  107. Wolfram 1997, pp. 57-59, 246, 401.
  108. Genethliacus of Maximian Augustus, p. 76.
  109. Genethliacus of Maximian Augustus, p. 100.
  110. Wolfram 1997, pp. 57-59.
  111. Bărbulescu 2005, pp. 190-191.
  112. 1 2 Bóna 1994, p. 77.
  113. Todd 2003, p. 220.
  114. Todd 2003, pp. 220, 223.
  115. 1 2 Heather 2006, p. 354.
  116. 1 2 Todd 2003, p. 223.
  117. Heather 2010, p. 224.
  118. Bóna 1994, p. 80.
  119. The Gothic History of Jordanes (50:264), p. 126.
  120. Bărbulescu 2005, p. 191.
  121. Bóna 1994, p. 84.
  122. Curta 2008, pp. 87, 205.
  123. 1 2 Bóna 1994, pp. 86, 89.
  124. Bóna 1994, pp. 86-87.
  125. Curta 2001, p. 194.
  126. Curta 2001, pp. 195, 201.
  127. Curta 2006, p. 63.
  128. 1 2 Todd 2003, p. 221.
  129. The History of Theophylact Simocatta (viii. 3.11.), p. 213.
  130. Curta 2006, p. 62.
  131. Wolfram 1997, p. 123.
  132. Ammianus Marcellinus: The Later Roman Empire (31.2.), p. 412.
  133. Thompson 2001, pp. 47, 50.
  134. Thompson 2001, pp. 30, 40-41.
  135. Wolfram 1997, pp. 123-124.
  136. Heather 2006, p. 196.
  137. Wolfram 1997, p. 126.
  138. Wolfram 1997, pp. 127-128.
  139. Treadgold 1997, pp. 93-94.
  140. 1 2 Heather 2006, p. 329.
  141. Heather 2006, pp. 325-329, 485.
  142. 1 2 Bury, J. B., Priscus at the court of Attila , retrieved 15 July 2012
  143. Maenchen-Helfen 1973, p. 177.
  144. Wolfram 1997, p. 131.
  145. Maenchen-Helfen 1973, p. 143.
  146. Heather 2006, pp. 353-354.
  147. Maenchen-Helfen 1973, p. 144.
  148. Heather 2006, p. 356.
  149. Heather 2006, pp. 359-360.
  150. Heather 2010, p. 200.
  151. Opreanu 2005, p. 119.
  152. Teodor 1980, p. 19.
  153. 1 2 Curta 2001, p. 285.
  154. Teodor 1980, p. 7.
  155. Barford 2001, p. 48.
  156. 1 2 Curta 2006, p. 57.
  157. Teodor 2005, pp. 216-222.
  158. 1 2 Teodor 2005, pp. 221-222.
  159. 1 2 Teodor 1980, p. 11.
  160. Barford 2001, pp. 201, 402.
  161. Teodor 2005, pp. 234-235.
  162. Barford 2001, p. 202.
  163. Curta 2008, p. 201.
  164. Curta 2001, pp. 81, 115.
  165. Curta 2001, p. 81.
  166. Barford 2001, p. 58.
  167. Maurice's Strategikon (11.4.4-5), p. 120.
  168. Curta 2005, p. 184.
  169. Curta 2005, p. 332.
  170. Procopius: History of the Wars (7.14.22.), p. 269.
  171. Procopius: History of the Wars (7.14.33.), p. 275.
  172. Curta 2001, pp. 79-80, 331-332.
  173. Curta 2005, pp. 186, 196.
  174. Barford 2001, p. 52.
  175. Curta 2001, p. 309.
  176. Curta 2008, pp. 185, 309.
  177. Curta 2008, p. 185.
  178. Curta 2001, pp. 295-297, 309.
  179. Heather 2010, pp. 213, 401.
  180. Treadgold 1997, pp. 220-221.
  181. 1 2 Engel 2001, pp. 2-3.
  182. Urbańczyk 2005, p. 144.
  183. 1 2 Bóna 1994, p. 93.
  184. Curta 2006, p. 65.
  185. Barford 2001, p. 57.
  186. Curta 2001, p. 115.
  187. Barford 2001, pp. 60-61.
  188. Curta 2001, p. 101.
  189. The History of Theophylact Simocatta (vi. 9.1.), p. 172.
  190. 1 2 Madgearu 2005a, pp. 103, 117.
  191. Barford 2001, pp. 79, 84.
  192. Madgearu 2005a, p. 106.
  193. Curta 2006, p. 92.
  194. 1 2 Fine 1991, p. 78.
  195. Bolovan et al. 1997, p. 52.
  196. Curta 2001, p. 291.
  197. Teodor 1980, pp. 63-64.
  198. Spinei 2009, pp. 80-81.
  199. Bóna 1994, pp. 98-99.
  200. The Geography of Ananias of Şirak (L1881.3.9), p. 48.
  201. 1 2 3 Bărbulescu 2005, p. 197.
  202. 1 2 Bóna 1994, p. 99.
  203. 1 2 Barford 2001, p. 76.
  204. Madgearu 2005a, pp. 105, 119.
  205. Madgearu 2005a, p. 104.
  206. Kristó 2003, p. 36.
  207. Bóna 1994, p. 98.
  208. Kristó 2003, pp. 37-38.
  209. Fine 1991, p. 43.
  210. Fiedler 2008, p. 152.
  211. Treadgold 1997, pp. 165-166.
  212. Curta 2006, p. 80.
  213. Fiedler 2008, pp. 153-154.
  214. Curta 2006, p. 81.
  215. Fiedler 2008, p. 154.
  216. Fine 1991, p. 68.
  217. Fiedler 2008, p. 157.
  218. Fine 1991, p. 69.
  219. Spinei 2009, pp. 50, 87.
  220. Opreanu 2005, p. 127.
  221. Fiedler 2008, p. 200.
  222. Curta 2006, p. 89.
  223. Teodor 1980, pp. 60-61.
  224. Spinei 2009, p. 236.
  225. Teodor 1980, p. 68.
  226. 1 2 3 Opreanu 2005, p. 122.
  227. Fiedler 2008, p. 159.
  228. Madgearu 2005b, p. 68.
  229. 1 2 Fiedler 2008, p. 161.
  230. 1 2 Madgearu 2005b, p. 134.
  231. Bóna 1994, pp. 101-102.
  232. Kristó 2003, p. 35.
  233. Curta 2006, pp. 17-20.
  234. Royal Frankish Annals (year 824), p. 116.
  235. Curta 2006, p. 157.
  236. Curta 2006, p. 149.
  237. Fine 1991, p. 99.
  238. Spinei 2009, p. 56.
  239. Spinei 2009, p. 57.
  240. Curta 2006, pp. 154, 156-157, 159.
  241. 1 2 3 4 Curta 2006, p. 178.
  242. Madgearu 2005b, p. 132.
  243. Annals of Fulda (year 892), p. 124.
  244. Spinei 2009, p. 59.
  245. Spinei 2009, pp. 58, 64.
  246. Sălăgean 2005, p. 145.
  247. 1 2 Fine 1991, p. 138.
  248. Stephenson 2000, p. 39.
  249. 1 2 3 4 Engel 2001, p. 11.
  250. Madgearu 2005b, p. 39.
  251. 1 2 Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (ch. 11.), p. 33.
  252. Sălăgean 2005, p. 140.
  253. Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (ch. 50.), p. 109.
  254. Macartney 1953, p. 81.
  255. 1 2 3 Sălăgean 2005, p. 141.
  256. Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (ch. 44.), p. 97.
  257. 1 2 Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (ch. 24.), p. 59.
  258. Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (ch. 25.), p. 61.
  259. Sălăgean 2005, p. 142.
  260. Curta 2006, p. 168.
  261. Treadgold 1997, p. 452.
  262. Curta 2006, p. 177.
  263. Curta 2006, pp. 221-222.
  264. Sălăgean 2005, p. 143.
  265. 1 2 Stephenson 2000, pp. 51-58.
  266. Fine 1991, pp. 187-189.
  267. Sălăgean 2005, p. 152.
  268. Fine 1991, pp. 198-199.
  269. Curta 2006, pp. 102-103.
  270. Stephenson 2000, p. 75.
  271. Spinei 2003, p. 55.
  272. Curta 2006, p. 188.
  273. 1 2 3 Sălăgean 2005, p. 146.
  274. Madgearu 2005b, pp. 21-22.
  275. 1 2 Georgescu 1991, p. 15.
  276. Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (ch. 27.), p. 65.
  277. Madgearu 2005b, p. 92.
  278. The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle (ch. 28), p. 98.
  279. 1 2 Bóna 1994, pp. 114-115.
  280. Madgearu 2005b, pp. 108-109.
  281. 1 2 Kristó 2003, p. 52.
  282. Constantine Porphyrogenitus: De Administrando Imperio (ch. 40), p. 177.
  283. Stephenson 2000, pp. 43-44.
  284. Curta 2006, p. 190.
  285. Kristó 2003, pp. 61-62.
  286. Vistai, András János, Tekintő: Erdélyi helynévkönyv, Második kötet, IP (""Tekintő": Book on Transylvanian Toponymy, Volume II, IP ") (PDF), retrieved 22 July 2012
  287. Bóna 1994, p. 118.
  288. Kristó 2003, pp. 58-59.
  289. 1 2 Curta 2006, p. 250.
  290. Spinei 2009, p. 90.
  291. Curta 2006, pp. 180, 183.
  292. Constantine Porphyrogenitus: De Administrando Imperio (ch. 37), p. 169.
  293. Curta 2006, pp. 182-183.
  294. Spinei 2003, p. 120.
  295. Curta 2006, pp. 185-186.
  296. Spinei 2009, p. 200.
  297. Curta 2006, p. 186.
  298. Curta 2006, p. 184.
  299. Curta 2006, pp. 186-187.
  300. Eymund's Saga (ch. 8.), pp. 79–80.
  301. Spinei 2003, pp. 105, 125.
  302. Spinei 2009, p. 54.
  303. Curta 2006, p. 303.
  304. Jesch 2001, pp. 257-258.
  305. Spinei 2009, pp. 54-55.
  306. Jesch 2001, p. 258.
  307. Spinei 2009, pp. 52-53.
  308. Stephenson 2000, pp. 89-90.
  309. 1 2 Spinei 2009, p. 117.
  310. Spinei 2009, pp. 126-127.
  311. Fine 1991, p. 187.
  312. Stephenson 2000, p. 55.
  313. Stephenson 2000, p. 57.
  314. Spinei 2009, pp. 121-122.
  315. Anna Comnena: The Alexiad (10.3.), p. 299.
  316. Vékony 2000, p. 212.
  317. Vékony 2000, p. 215.
  318. Spinei 2009, p. 132.
  319. Sălăgean 2005, p. 168.
  320. Treptow & Popa 1996, p. xv.
  321. 1 2 Vékony 2000, pp. 27-29.
  322. Engel 2001, p. 27.
  323. Kristó 2003, p. 66.
  324. Sălăgean 2005, pp. 150-151.
  325. Curta 2006, pp. 248-250.
  326. Kristó 2003, p. 42.
  327. Hartwick, Life of King Stephen of Hungary (8), p. 383.
  328. Curta 2006, p. 432.
  329. Engel 2001, pp. 40-41.
  330. Curta 2006, p. 355.
  331. Sălăgean 2005, p. 160.
  332. Kristó 2003, pp. 97-98.
  333. 1 2 Bóna 1994, p. 169.
  334. Kristó 2003, p. 99.
  335. Kristó 2003, p. 100.
  336. Curta 2006, pp. 250-252.
  337. Bóna 1994, pp. 162-163.
  338. Curta 2006, pp. 250-251, 351.
  339. Engel 2001, pp. 116-117.
  340. Sălăgean 2005, p. 162.
  341. Engel 2001, p. 115.
  342. Kristó 2003, p. 133.
  343. Kristó 2003, pp. 136-137.
  344. Curta 2006, p. 352.
  345. 1 2 Curta 2006, p. 353.
  346. Kristó 2003, p. 122.
  347. Sălăgean 2005, p. 163.
  348. 1 2 Sălăgean 2005, p. 164.
  349. Curta 2006, p. 354.
  350. 1 2 Makkai 1994, p. 189.
  351. Kristó 2003, p. 140.
  352. 1 2 Engel 2001, p. 119.
  353. Sălăgean 2005, pp. 171-172.
  354. Spinei 2009, p. 147.
  355. 1 2 3 Makkai 1994, p. 193.
  356. 1 2 Engel 2001, p. 95.
  357. 1 2 Sălăgean 2005, p. 173.
  358. Spinei 2009, p. 246.
  359. Spinei 2009, p. 257.
  360. Vásáry 2005, pp. 42-47.
  361. 1 2 Curta 2006, p. 306.
  362. Spinei 2009, pp. 193-194.
  363. Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus by John Kinnamos (6.3.261), p. 196.
  364. Curta 2006, p. 317.
  365. Spinei 2009, p. 298.
  366. 1 2 Curta 2006, p. 406.
  367. 1 2 Curta 2006, p. 408.
  368. Spinei 2009, p. 409.
  369. Vásáry 2005, p. 64.
  370. Vásáry 2005, pp. 64-65.
  371. 1 2 3 4 Curta 2006, p. 410.
  372. Master Roger's Epistle (ch. 20), p. 167.
  373. Makkai 1994, p. 195.
  374. 1 2 The Successors of Genghis Khan (ch. 1.), p. 70.
  375. Spinei 2009, pp. 436-442.
  376. Spinei 2009, p. 447.
  377. Curta 2006, pp. 413-414.
  378. Curta 2006, p. 414.
  379. Vistai, András János, Tekintő: Erdélyi helynévkönyv, Első kötet, AH (""Tekintő": Book on Transylvanian Toponymy, Volume II, AH ") (PDF), retrieved 27 July 2012
  380. Kristó 2003, pp. 156-157.
  381. Vistai, András János, Tekintő: Erdélyi helynévkönyv, Harmadik kötet, QZs (""Tekintő": Book on Transylvanian Toponymy, Volume II, QZs") (PDF), retrieved 27 July 2012
  382. Kristó 2003, p. 157.
  383. Master Roger's Epistle (ch. 37), p. 213.
  384. Kristó 2003, p. 2003.
  385. 1 2 Spinei 2009, p. 163.
  386. Sălăgean 2005, pp. 179-183.
  387. Sălăgean 2005, pp. 177-178.
  388. Sălăgean 2005, p. 192.
  389. 1 2 Georgescu 1991, p. 17.


Primary sources

  • Ammianus Marcellinus: The Later Roman Empire (AD 354378) (Selected and translated by Walter Hamilton, With an Introduction and Notes by Andrew Wallace-Hadrill) (2004). Penguin Books. ISBN   978-0-14-044406-3.
  • Anna Comnena: The Alexiad (Translated by E. R. A. Sewter) (1969). Penguin Books. ISBN   978-0-14-044958-7.
  • Anonymus, Notary of King Béla: The Deeds of the Hungarians (Edited, Translated and Annotated by Martyn Rady and László Veszprémy) (2010). In: Rady, Martyn; Veszprémy, László; Bak, János M. (2010); Anonymus and Master Roger; CEU Press; ISBN   978-963-9776-95-1.
  • Constantine Porphyrogenitus: De Administrando Imperio (Greek text edited by Gyula Moravcsik, English translation b Romillyi J. H. Jenkins) (1967). Dumbarton Oaks Center for Byzantine Studies. ISBN   0-88402-021-5.
  • Deeds of John and Manuel Comnenus by John Kinnamos (Translated by Charles M. Brand) (1976). Columbia University Press. ISBN   0-231-04080-6.
  • Eymund's Saga (1989). In Vikings in Russia: Yngvar's Saga and Eymund's Saga (Translated and Introduced by Hermann Palsson and Paul Edwards). Edingburgh University Press. pp. 69–89. ISBN   0-85224-623-4.
  • Eutropius: Breviarium (Translated with an introduction and commentary by H. W. Bird) (1993). Liverpool University Press. ISBN   0-85323-208-3.
  • Genethliacus of Maximian Augustus by an Anonymous Orator (291) (Translation and Notes by Rodgers) (1994). In: In Praise of Later Roman Emperors: The Panegyrici Latini (Introduction, Translation, and Historical Commentary with the Latin Text of R. A. B. Mynors by C. E. V. Nixon and Barbara Saylor Rodgers) (1994); University of California Press; ISBN   0-520-08326-1.
  • Hartvic, Life of King Stephen of Hungary (Translated by Nora Berend) (2001). In: Head, Thomas (2001); Medieval Hagiography: An Anthology; Routledge; ISBN   0-415-93753-1.
  • Master Roger's Epistle to the Sorrowful Lament upon the Destruction of the Kingdom of Hungary by the Tatars (Translated and Annotated by János M. Bak and Martyn Rady) (2010). In: Rady, Martyn; Veszprémy, László; Bak, János M. (2010); Anonymus and Master Roger; CEU Press; ISBN   978-963-9776-95-1.
  • Maurice's Strategikon: Handbook of Byzantine Military Strategy (Translated by George T. Dennis) (1984). University of Pennsylvania Press. ISBN   0-8122-1772-1.
  • Philostorgius: Church History (Translated with an Introduction and Notes by Philip R. Amidon, S. J.) (2007). Society of Biblical Literature. ISBN   978-1-58983-215-2.
  • Procopius: History of the Wars (Books VI.16VII.35.) (With an English Translation by H. B. Dewing) (2006). Harvard University Press. ISBN   0-674-99191-5.
  • Royal Frankish Annals (1972). In: Carolingian Chronicles: Royal Frankish Annals and Nithard's Histories (Translated by Bernhard Walter Scholz with Barbara Rogers); The University of Michigan Press; ISBN   0-472-06186-0.
  • The Annals of Fulda (Ninth-Century Histories, Volume II) (Translated and annotated by Timothy Reuter) (1992). Manchester University Press. ISBN   0-7190-3458-2.
  • The Chronicle of Theophanes Confessor: Byzantine and Near Eastern History, AD 284813 (Translated with Introduction and Commentary by Cyril Mango and Roger Scott with the assistance of Geoffrey Greatrex) (2006). Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-822568-3.
  • The Geography of Ananias of Širak (AŠXARHAC’OYC’): The Long and the Short Recensions (Introduction, Translation and Commentary by Robert H. Hewsen) (1992). Dr. Ludwig Reichert Verlag. ISBN   3-88226-485-3.
  • The Gothic History of Jordanes (in English Version with an Introduction and a Commentary by Charles Christopher Mierow, Ph.D., Instructor in Classics in Princeton University) (2006). Evolution Publishing. ISBN   1-889758-77-9.
  • The History of Theophylact Simocatta (An English Translation with Introduction and Notes: Michael and Mary Whitby) (1986). Clarendon Press. ISBN   0-19-822799-X.
  • The Hungarian Illuminated Chronicle: Chronica de Gestis Hungarorum (Edited by Dezső Dercsényi) (1970). Corvina, Taplinger Publishing. ISBN   0-8008-4015-1.
  • The Successors of Genghis Khan (Translated from the Persian of Rashīd Al-Dīn by John Andrew Boyle) (1971). Columbia University Press. ISBN   0-231-03351-6.

Secondary sources

  • Barford, P. M. (2001). The Early Slavs: Culture and Society in Early Medieval Eastern Europe. Cornell University Press. ISBN   0-8014-3977-9.
  • Bărbulescu, Mihai (2005). "From the Romans until the End of the First Millenium AD". In Pop, Ioan-Aurel; Nägler, Thomas (eds.). The History of Transylvania, Vol. I. (until 1541). Romanian Cultural Institute. pp. 137–198. ISBN   973-7784-04-9.
  • Bolovan, Ioan; Constantiniu, Florin; Michelson, Paul E.; Pop, Ioan Aurel; Popa, Cristian; Popa, Marcel; Scurtu, Ioan; Treptow, Kurt W.; Vultur, Marcela; Watts, Larry L. (1997). A History of Romania. The Center for Romanian Studies. ISBN   973-98091-0-3.
  • Bóna, István (1994). "From Dacia to Transylvania: The Period of the Great Migrations (271895); The HungarianSlav Period (8951172)". In Köpeczi, Béla; Barta, Gábor; Bóna, István; Makkai, László; Szász, Zoltán; Borus, Judit (eds.). History of Transylvania. Akadémiai Kiadó. pp. 62–177. ISBN   963-05-6703-2.
  • Curta, Florin (2001). The Making of the Slavs: History and Archaeology of the Lower Danube Region, c. 500–700. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Curta, Florin (2005). "Frontier Ethnogenesis in Late Antiquity: The Danube, the Tervingi, and the Slavs". In Curta, Florin (ed.). Borders, Barriers, and Ethnogenesis: Frontiers in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Brepols. pp. 173–204. ISBN   2-503-51529-0.
  • Curta, Florin (2006). Southeastern Europe in the Middle Ages, 500–1250 . Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  • Curta, Florin (2008). "Before Cyril and Methodius: Christianity and Barbarians beyond the Sixth- and Seventh-Century Danube Frontier". In Curta, Florin (ed.). East Central & Eastern Europe in the Early Middle Ages. The University of Michigan Press. pp. 181–219. ISBN   978-0-472-11498-6.
  • Ellis, L. (1998). "Terra deserta: population, politics, and the [de]colonization of Dacia". In Shennan, Stephen (ed.). Population and Demography (World Archaeology, Volume Thirty, Number Two). Routledge. pp. 220–237. ISSN   0043-8243.
  • Engel, Pál (2001). The Realm of St Stephen: A History of Medieval Hungary, 895–1526. I.B. Tauris Publishers. ISBN   1-86064-061-3.
  • Fiedler, Uwe (2008). "Bulgars in the Lower Danube region: A survey of the archaeological evidence and of the state of current research". In Curta, Florin; Kovalev, Roman (eds.). The Other Europe in the Middle Ages: Avars, Bulgars, Khazars, and Cumans. Brill. pp. 151–236. ISBN   978-90-04-16389-8.
  • Fine, John V. A (1991). The Early Medieval Balkans: A Critical Survey from the Sixth to the Late Twelfth century. The University of Michigan Press. ISBN   0-472-08149-7.
  • Georgescu, Vlad (1991). The Romanians: A History. Ohio State University Press. ISBN   0-8142-0511-9.
  • Hall, Robert A., Jr. (1974). External History of the Romance Languages . American Elsevier Publishing Company. ISBN   0-444-00136-0.
  • Haynes, I. P.; Hanson, W. S. (2004). "An introduction to Roman Dacia". In Haynes, I. P.; Hanson, W. S. (eds.). Roman Dacia: The Making of a Provincial Society (Journal of Roman Archaeology Supplementary Series, Number 56). Journal of Roman Archaeology, L.L.C. pp. 11–31. ISBN   1-887829-56-3.
  • Heather, Peter; Matthews, John (1991). The Goths in the Fourth Century (Translated Texts for Historians, Volume 11). Liverpool University Press. ISBN   978-0-85323-426-5.
  • Heather, Peter (2006). The Fall of the Roman Empire: A New History of Rome and the Barbarians. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-515954-7.
  • Heather, Peter (2010). Empires and Barbarians: The Fall of Rome and the Birth of Europe. Oxford University Press. ISBN   978-0-19-973560-0.
  • Jesch, Judith (2001). Ships and Men in the Late Viking Age: The Vocabulary of Runic Inscriptions and Skaldic Verse. Boydell & Brewer. ISBN   978-0-85115-826-6.
  • Kristó, Gyula (2003). Early Transylvania (895-1324). Lucidus Kiadó. ISBN   963-9465-12-7.
  • Macartney, C. A. (1953). The Medieval Hungarian Historians: A Critical & Analytical Guide. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-08051-4.
  • MacKendrick, Paul (1975). The Dacian Stones Speak. The University of North Carolina Press. ISBN   0-8078-1226-9.
  • Madgearu, Alexandru (2005a). "Salt Trade and Warfare: The Rise of Romanian-Slavic Military Organization in Early Medieval Transylvania". In Curta, Florin (ed.). East Central & Eastern Europe in the Early Middle Ages. The University of Michigan Press. pp. 103–120. ISBN   978-0-472-11498-6.
  • Madgearu, Alexandru (2005b). The Romanians in the Anonymous Gesta Hungarorum: Truth and Fiction. Romanian Cultural Institute, Center for Transylvanian Studies. ISBN   973-7784-01-4.
  • Maenchen-Helfen, Otto J. (1973). The World of the Huns: Studies in Their History and Culture (Edited by Max Knight). University of California Press. ISBN   0-520-01596-7.
  • Makkai, László (1994). "The Emergence of the Estates (11721526)". In Köpeczi, Béla; Barta, Gábor; Bóna, István; Makkai, László; Szász, Zoltán; Borus, Judit (eds.). History of Transylvania. Akadémiai Kiadó. pp. 178–243. ISBN   963-05-6703-2.
  • Mallinson, Graham (1998). "Rumanian". In Harris, Martin; Vincent, Nigel (eds.). The Romance Languages. Oxford University Press. pp. 391–419. ISBN   0-19-520829-3.
  • Nandris, Grigore (December 1951). "The Development and Structure of Rumanian". The Slavonic and East European Review. London: Modern Humanities Research Association & University College of London (School of Slavonic and East European Studies). 30 (74): 7–39.
  • Opreanu, Coriolan Horaţiu (2005). "The North-Danube Regions from the Roman Province of Dacia to the Emergence of the Romanian Language (2nd8th Centuries AD)". In Pop, Ioan-Aurel; Bolovan, Ioan (eds.). History of Romania: Compendium. Romanian Cultural Institute (Center for Transylvanian Studies). pp. 59–132. ISBN   978-973-7784-12-4.
  • Orel, Vladimir (1998). Albanian Etymological Dictionary. BRILL. ISBN   90-04-11024-0.
  • Petrucci, Peter R. (1999). Slavic Features in the History of Rumanian. LINCOM EUROPA. ISBN   3-89586-599-0.
  • Sălăgean, Tudor (2005). "Romanian Society in the Early Middle Ages (9th14th Centuries AD)". In Pop, Ioan-Aurel; Bolovan, Ioan (eds.). History of Romania: Compendium. Romanian Cultural Institute (Center for Transylvanian Studies). pp. 133–207. ISBN   978-973-7784-12-4.
  • Spinei, Victor (2003). The Great Migrations in the East and South East of Europe from the Ninth to the Thirteenth Century. Romanian Cultural Institute (Center for Transylvanian Studies) and Museum of Brăila Istros Publishing House. ISBN   973-85894-5-2.
  • Spinei, Victor (2009). The Romanians and the Turkic Nomads North of the Danube Delta from the Tenth to the Mid-Thirteenth century. Koninklijke Brill NV. ISBN   978-90-04-17536-5.
  • Stephenson, Paul (2000). Byzantium's Balkan Frontier: A Political Study of the Northern Balkans, 9001204. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   978-0-521-02756-4.
  • Teodor, Dan Gh. (1980). The East Carpathian Area of Romania in the V-XI Centuries A.D. (BAR International Series 81). B. A. R. ISBN   0-86054-090-1.
  • Teodor, Eugen S. (2005). "The Shadow of a Frontier: The Wallachian Plain during the Justinian Age". In Curta, Florin (ed.). Borders, Barriers, and Ethnogenesis: Frontiers in Late Antiquity and the Middle Ages. Brepols. pp. 205–245. ISBN   2-503-51529-0.
  • Thompson, E. A. (2001). The Huns. Blackwell Publishers. ISBN   0-631-15899-5.
  • Todd, Malcolm (2003). The Early Germans. Blackwell Publishing Ltd. ISBN   0-631-16397-2.
  • Tóth, Endre (1994). "The Roman Province of Dacia". In Köpeczi, Béla; Barta, Gábor; Bóna, István; Makkai, László; Szász, Zoltán; Borus, Judit (eds.). History of Transylvania. Akadémiai Kiadó. pp. 28–61. ISBN   963-05-6703-2.
  • Treadgold, Warren (1997). A History of the Byzantine State and Society. Stanford University Press. ISBN   0-8047-2630-2.
  • Treptow, Kurt W.; Popa, Marcel (1996). Historical Dictionary of Romania. Scarecrow Press, Inc. ISBN   0-8108-3179-1.
  • Urbańczyk, Przemysław (2005). "Early State Formation in East Central Europe". In Curta, Florin (ed.). East Central & Eastern Europe in the Early Middle Ages. The University of Michigan Press. pp. 139–151. ISBN   978-0-472-11498-6.
  • Vásáry, István (2005). Cumans and Tatars: Oriental Military in the Pre-Ottoman Balkans, 1185–1365. Cambridge University Press. ISBN   0-521-83756-1.
  • Vékony, Gábor (2000). Dacians, Romans, Romanians. Matthias Corvinus Publishing. ISBN   1-882785-13-4.
  • Wolfram, Herwig (1988). History of the Goths. University of California Press. ISBN   0-520-06983-8.
  • Wolfram, Herwig (1997). The Roman Empire and Its Germanic Peoples. ISBN   0-520-08511-6.

Further reading

Related Research Articles

Gepids Germanic tribe

The Gepids were an East Germanic tribe who lived in the area of modern Romania, Hungary and Serbia, roughly between the Tisza, Sava and Carpathian mountains. They were closely related to, or a subdivision of, the Goths.

The Middle Ages in Romania began with the withdrawal of the Mongols, the last of the migrating populations to invade the territory of modern Romania, after their attack of 1241–1242. It came to an end with the reign of Michael the Brave (1593–1601) who managed, for a short time in 1600, to rule Wallachia, Moldavia, and Transylvania, the three principalities whose territories were to be united some three centuries later to form Romania.

Árpád Grand Prince of the Hungarians

Árpád was the head of the confederation of the Magyar tribes at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. He might have been either the sacred ruler or kende of the Hungarians, or their military leader or gyula, although most details of his life are debated by historians, because different sources contain contradictory information. Despite this, many Hungarians refer to him as the "founder of our country", and Árpád's preeminent role in the Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin has been emphasized by some later chronicles. The dynasty descending from Árpád ruled the Kingdom of Hungary until 1301.

Several theories address the issue of the origin of the Romanians. The Romanian language descends from the Vulgar Latin dialects spoken in the Roman provinces north of the "Jireček Line" in Late Antiquity. The theory of Daco-Roman continuity argues that the Romanians are mainly descended from the Daco-Romans, a people developing through the cohabitation of the native Dacians and the Roman colonists in the province of Dacia Traiana north of the river Danube. The competing immigrationist theory states that the Romanians' ethnogenesis commenced in the provinces south of the river with Romanized local populations spreading through mountain refuges, both south to Greece and north through the Carpathian Mountains. Other theories state that the Romanized local populations were present over a wide area on both sides of the Danube and the river itself did not constitute an obstacle to permanent exchanges in both directions; according to the "admigration" theory, migrations from the Balkan Peninsula to the lands north of the Danube contributed to the survival of the Romance-speaking population in these territories.

Bihar County

Bihar was an administrative county (comitatus) of the Kingdom of Hungary and a county of the Eastern Hungarian Kingdom and Principality of Transylvania. Most of its territory is now part of Romania, while a smaller western part belongs to Hungary. The capital of the county was Nagyvárad.

<i>Gesta Hungarorum</i> The first extant Hungarian book about history

Gesta Hungarorum, or The Deeds of the Hungarians, is the first extant Hungarian book about history. Its genre is not chronicle, but gesta, meaning "deeds" or "acts", which is a medieval entertaining literature. It was written by an unidentified author who has traditionally been called Anonymus in scholarly works. According to most historians, the work was completed between around 1200 and 1230. The Gesta exists in a sole manuscript from the second part of the 13th century, which was for centuries held in Vienna. It is part of the collection of Széchényi National Library in Budapest.

Menumorut or Menumorout was the ruler of the lands between the rivers Mureș, Someș and Tisza at the time of the Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin around 900, according to the Gesta Hungarorum, a Hungarian chronicle written after 1150 by an unidentified author, referred to as Anonymus. Historians debate whether Menumorut was an actual ruler or a fictional character created by the author, since the Gesta tells of multiple figures, including Menumorut, who are not identified in any other primary sources, and does not name any of the enemies of the invading Hungarians written of in other contemporary accounts of the invasion. According to Anonymus, Menumorut's duchy was populated primarily with Khazars and Székelys, and he acknowledged the suzerainty of the (unnamed) ruling Byzantine Emperor at the time.

Gelou Legendary Vlach ruler of Transylvania around 900 AD

Gelou was the Vlach ruler of Transylvania at the time of the Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin around 900 AD, according to the Gesta Hungarorum. Although the Gesta Hungarorum, which was written after 1150, does not indicate the enemies of the conquering Hungarians (Magyars) known from earlier annals and chronicles, it refers to local rulers—including Gelou—who are not mentioned in other primary sources. Consequently, historians debate whether Gelou was a historical person or an imaginary figure created by the unidentified author of the Gesta Hungarorum. In Romanian historiography, Gelou is one of three early-10th-century Romanian dukes with lands in the intra-Carpathian region of present-day Romania.


Ajtony, Ahtum or Achtum was an early-11th-century ruler in the territory now known as Banat in present Romania and Serbia. His primary source is the Long Life of Saint Gerard, a 14th-century hagiography. Ajtony was a powerful ruler who owned many horses, cattle and sheep and was baptised according to the Orthodox rite in Vidin. He taxed salt which was transferred to King Stephen I of Hungary on the Mureș River. The king sent Csanád, Ajtony's former commander-in-chief, against him at the head of a large army. Csanád defeated and killed Ajtony, occupying his realm. In the territory, at least one county and a Roman Catholic diocese were established.

Glad (duke) Legendary ruler of Banat around 900 AD

Glad was the ruler of Banat at the time of the Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin around 900 AD, according to the Gesta Hungarorum. The Gesta, which was written by an author known in modern scholarship as Anonymus in the second half of the 12th century or in the early 13th century, is the earliest extant Hungarian chronicle. The Gesta did not refer to the enemies of the conquering Hungarians, who had been mentioned in earlier annals and chronicles, but wrote of a dozen persons, including Glad, who are unknown from other primary sources of the Hungarian Conquest. Therefore, modern historians debate whether Glad was an actual enemy of the conquerors or only a "fictitious person" made up by Anonymus. In Romanian historiography, Glad is described as one of the three Romanian dukes who ruled a historical region of present-day Romania in the early 10th century.

The history of Christianity in Romania began within the Roman province of Lower Moesia, where many Christians were martyred at the end of the 3rd century. Evidence of Christian communities has been found in the territory of modern Romania at over a hundred archaeological sites from the 3rd and 4th centuries. However, sources from the 7th and 10th centuries are so scarce that Christianity seems to have diminished during this period.

The Roman Catholic Diocese of Cumania was a Latin-rite bishopric west of the Siret River from 1228 to 1241. The lands incorporated into the diocese had been dominated by the nomadic Cumans since about 1100. Catholic missions began after Andrew II of Hungary granted Burzenland to the Teutonic Knights in 1211. After Andrew expelled the Knights from the territory in 1225, Dominican friars continued the Cuman mission. Robert, Archbishop of Esztergom baptized Boricius, an influential Cuman chieftain, two years later.

This is a timeline of Romanian history, comprising important legal and territorial changes and political events in Romania and its predecessor states. To read about the background to these events, see History of Romania.

The foundation of Wallachia, that is the establishment of the first independent Romanian principality, was achieved at the beginning of the 14th century, through the unification of smaller political units that had existed between the Carpathian Mountains, and the Rivers Danube, Siret and Milcov.

The founding of Moldavia began with the arrival of a Vlach (Romanian) voivode, Dragoș, soon followed by his people from Maramureș to the region of the Moldova River. Dragoș established a polity there as a vassal to the Kingdom of Hungary in the 1350s. The independence of the Principality of Moldavia was gained when Bogdan I, another Vlach voivode from Maramureș who had fallen out with the Hungarian king, crossed the Carpathians in 1359 and took control of Moldavia, wresting the region from Hungary. It remained a principality until 1859, when it united with Wallachia, initiating the development of the modern Romanian state.

Banat in the Middle Ages

The Middle Ages in the Banat started around 900. Around that time, Duke Glad ruled Banat, according to the Gesta Hungarorum. Archaeological finds and 10th-century sources evidence that Magyars settled in the lowlands in the early 10th century, but the survival of Avar, Slav and Bulgar communities can also be documented. A local chieftain, Ajtony, converted to Eastern Orthodoxy around 1000, but his attempts to control the delivery of salt on the Mureș River brought him into conflict with Stephen I of Hungary. Ajtony died fighting against the royal army in the first decades of the 11th century. His realm was transformed into a county of the Kingdom of Hungary. Counties were the most prominent units of royal administration.

The Hungarian conquest of the Carpathian Basin, also Hungarian conquest or Hungarian land-taking, was a series of historical events ending with the settlement of the Hungarians in Central Europe at the turn of the 9th and 10th centuries. Before the arrival of the Hungarians, three early medieval powers, the First Bulgarian Empire, East Francia and Moravia, had fought each other for control of the Carpathian Basin. They occasionally hired Hungarian horsemen as soldiers. Therefore, the Hungarians who dwelt on the Pontic steppes east of the Carpathians were familiar with their future homeland when their "land-taking" started.


Blakumen or Blökumenn were a people mentioned in Scandinavian sources dating from the 11th through 13th centuries. The name of their land, Blokumannaland, has also been preserved. Victor Spinei, Florin Curta, Florin Pintescu and other historians identify them as Romanians, while Omeljan Pritsak argues that they were Cumans. Judith Jesch adds the possibility that the terms meant "black men", the meaning of which is unclear. Historians identify Blokumannaland as the lands south of the Lower Danube which were inhabited by Vlachs in the Middle Ages, adding that the term may refer to either Wallachia or Africa in the modern Icelandic language.

The Balkan–Danubian culture was an early medieval archaeological culture which emerged in the region of the Lower Danube in the 8th century and flourished until the 11th century. In Romania it is called Dridu culture, while in Bulgaria it is usually referred to as Pliska-Preslav culture. It is better represented on the territory of modern-day Northern Bulgaria although its spread north of the Danube is also well attested due to the continuous extension of the First Bulgarian Empire over the territory of present-day Romania, also known as Bulgarian lands across the Danube. The Balkan–Danubian culture is described as an early Slavic-Bulgarian culture, but besides Slavic and Bulgar elements it possesses also some Romance components, all of them under a Byzantine influence.

Battle of Kerlés

The Battle of Kerlés or Battle of Chiraleș, also known as the Battle of Cserhalom, was an engagement between an army of Pechenegs and Ouzes commanded by Osul and the troops of King Solomon of Hungary and his cousins, Dukes Géza and Ladislaus, in Transylvania in 1068. The Pechenegs had been the dominant power of the westernmost regions of the Eurasian steppes since around 895. However, large Pecheneg groups moved to the Balkan Peninsula at the same time as the westward migration of the Ouzes and Cumans in the 1040s. The first recorded Pecheneg invasion of Transylvania occurred during the reign of Stephen I of Hungary.