Trichotomy (philosophy)

Last updated

A trichotomy is a three-way classificatory division. Some philosophers pursued trichotomies.

Contents

History

Important trichotomies discussed by Aquinas include the causal principles (agent, patient, act), the potencies for the intellect (imagination, cogitative power, and memory and reminiscence), and the acts of the intellect (concept, judgment, reasoning), with all of those rooted in Aristotle; also the transcendentals of being (unity, truth, goodness) and the requisites of the beautiful (wholeness, harmony, radiance).

Kant expounded a table of judgments involving four three-way alternatives, in regard to (1) Quantity, (2) Quality, (3) Relation, (4) Modality, and, based thereupon, a table of four categories, named by the terms just listed, and each with three subcategories. Kant also adapted the Thomistic acts of intellect in his trichotomy of higher cognition—(a) understanding, (b) judgment, (c) reason—which he correlated with his adaptation in the soul's capacities—(a) cognitive faculties, (b) feeling of pleasure or displeasure, and (c) faculty of desire [1] —of Tetens's trichotomy of feeling, understanding, and will. [2] In his Logic (113) Kant notes that all "polytomy are empirical" and "cannot be taught in logic". [3]

Hegel held that a thing's or idea's internal contradiction leads in a dialectical process to a new synthesis that makes better sense of the contradiction. The process is sometimes described as thesis, antithesis, synthesis. It is instanced across a pattern of trichotomies (e.g. being-nothingness-becoming, immediate-mediate-concrete, abstract-negative-concrete); such trichotomies are not just three-way classificatory divisions; they involve trios of elements functionally interrelated in a process. They are often called triads (but 'triad' does not have that as a fixed sense in philosophy generally).

Charles Sanders Peirce built his philosophy on trichotomies and triadic relations and processes, and framed the "Reduction Thesis" that every predicate is essentially either monadic (quality), dyadic (relation of reaction or resistance), or triadic (representational relation), and never genuinely and irreducibly tetradic or larger.

Examples of philosophical trichotomies

Plato's 3 parts of man [4] [5] Nous (mind, intellect). Psyche (soul). Soma (body).
Plato's 3 transcendentals Truth (logic, verum). Goodness (ethics, bonum). Beauty (aesthetics, pulchrum).
Plato's tripartite soul Logistikon (logical, rational). Thymoeides (spirited, various animal qualities). Epithymetikon (appetitive, volitive, libidinous, desiring).
Aristotle's 3 kinds of soul Threptike (nutritive, vegetative). Aisthetike (sensitive, animal). Noetike (rational, human).
Aristotle's 3 main modes of persuasion Ethos. Pathos. Logos.
Plotinus' three principles The One . Nous (mind, intellect). Psyche (soul).
Shema's 3 elements of man1] לב (lev) /Kardia (heart).

2] נפׁש (nephesh) /Psyche (soul). 3] מְאֹד (me'od) /Dynamis (power) [6] [7]

Saint Paul's tripartite nature of humanity (I Thes. 5:23) Pneuma (spirit). Psyche (soul). Soma (body).
(Paul uses alternative concepts in other passages: kardia [heart], eso kai exo anthropos [inner and outer human being]; nous [mind]; suneidesis [conscience]; sarx [flesh]). [8]
Saint Augustine's 3 Laws [9] Divine Law. Natural Law. Temporal, Positive, or Human Law.
Saint Augustine's 3 features of the soul [10] Intellect. Will. Memory. (Saint John of the Cross, OCD follows this also, but may erroneously identify them as 3 distinct powers. [11] )
Saint Albertus Magnus' 3 Universals [12] Ante rem (Idea in God's mind). In re (potential or actual in things). Post rem (mentally abstracted).
Saint Thomas Aquinas, O.P.'s 3 causal principles [13] (based in Aristotle)Agent. Patient. Act.
Aquinas' 3 potencies for intellect [13] (based in Aristotle)Imagination. Cogitative power (or, in animals, instinct). Memory (and, in humans, reminiscence).
Aquinas' 3 acts of intellect [13] (based in Aristotle)Conception. Judgment. Reasoning.
Aquinas' 3 transcendentals of being [13] Unity. Truth. Goodness.
Aquinas' 3 requisites for the beautiful [13] Wholeness or perfection. Harmony or due proportion. Radiance.
Sir Francis Bacon's 3 Tables [14] Presence. Absence. Degree.
Bacon's 3 faculties of mindMemory. Reason. Imagination.
Bacon's 3 branches of knowledgeHistory. Philosophy. Poetry. (Inspired the figurative system of human knowledge of Diderot and d'Alembert.)
Thomas Hobbes' 3 FieldsPhysics. Moral Philosophy. Civil Philosophy.
John Dryden's 3 ways of transferring Metaphrase. Paraphrase. Imitation.
Christian Wolff's 3 special metaphysics Rational psychology. Rational cosmology. Rational theology.
Kant's 3 faculties of soul [1] Faculties of knowledge. Feeling of pleasure or displeasure. Faculty of desire (which Kant regarded also as the will).
Kant's 3 higher faculties of cognition [1] Understanding. Judgment. Reason.
Kant's 3 judgments of quantityUniversal. Particular. Singular
Kant's 3 categories of quantityUnity. Plurality. Totality
Kant's 3 judgments of quality Affirmative. Negative. Infinite
Kant's 3 categories of quality Reality. Negation. Limitation.
Kant's 3 judgments of relation Categorical. Hypothetical. Disjunctive.
Kant's 3 categories of relation Inherence and subsistence. Causality and dependence. Community.
  In other words:
Substance and accident. Cause and effect. Reciprocity.
Kant's 3 judgments of modalityProblematical. Assertoric. Apodictic
Kant's 3 categories of modality Possibility. Existence. Necessity
Johannes Nikolaus Tetens's 3 powers of mind [2] Feeling. Understanding. Will.
Hannah Arendt's vita activa Labor, Work, Action
Hegel's 3 Spirits [15] Subjective Spirit. Objective Spirit. Absolute Spirit.
Søren Kierkegaard's 3 stages [16] Aesthetic. Ethical. Religious.
Charles Sanders Peirce's 3 categories Quality of feeling. Reaction, resistance. Representation, mediation.
C. S. Peirce's 3 universes of experienceIdeas. Brute fact. Habit (habit-taking).
C. S. Peirce's 3 orders of philosophy Phenomenology. Normative sciences. Metaphysics.
C. S. Peirce's 3 normatives The good (esthetic). The right (ethical). The true (logical).
C. S. Peirce's 3 semiotic elements Sign (representamen). Object. Interpretant.
C. S. Peirce's 3 grades of conceptual clearness By familiarity. Of definition's parts. Of conceivable practical implications.
C. S. Peirce's 3 active principles in the cosmos Spontaneity, absolute chance. Mechanical necessity. Creative love.
Gottlob Frege's 3 realms of sense [17] The external, public, physical. The internal, private, mental. The Platonic, ideal but objective (to which sentences refer).
Sigmund Freud's structural model [5] Id, ego, and superego (das „Es“, das „Ich“, das „Über-Ich“)
Edmund Husserl's 3 ReductionsPhenomenological. Eidetic. Religious.
R. Steiner more threefold aspects.Body, soul and spirit. Imagination, inspiration and intuition.
Korzybski's 3 types of lifeChemical-binder (i.e. plants). Space-binder (i.e. mammals). Time-binder (i.e. humans). Each one up the scale requires the previous one.
James Joyce's 3 aesthetic stages [18] Arrest (by wholeness). Fascination (by harmony). Enchantment (by radiance).
Jacques Lacan's 3 ordersReal, Symbolic, and Imaginary
Karl Popper's 3 worlds [19] Physical things and processes. Subjective human experience. Culture and objective knowledge
Louis Zukofsky's 3 aesthetic elements [20] Shape. Rhythm. Style.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty's 3 fields [21] Physical. Vital. Human.
Maurice Merleau-Ponty's 3 categories [21] Quantity. Order. Meaning.
Eric Berne's transactional analysis Parent, Adult, Child
Alan Watts' 3 world viewsLife as machine (Western). Life as organism (Chinese). Life as drama (Indian).

See also

Notes

  1. 1 2 3 Kant, Immanuel, The Critique of Judgment, 2007 edition, Cosimo Classics, pp. 10-11.
  2. 1 2 Teo, Thomas (2005), The critique of psychology: from Kant to postcolonial theory, p. 43.
  3. Kant I., (1800), Logic (Logik), tr. J. Richardson London, 1819, p.209. In preparation he states "A division into two members goes under the appelation of dichotomy; but it, when consisting of more than two, takes the name of poytomy".
  4. Plato, Timaeus , 30.
  5. 1 2 Calian, Florian (2012). Plato's Psychology of Action and the Origin of Agency. L'Harmattan. pp. 9–12. ISBN   978-963-236-587-9.
  6. Petersen, W.L. 2011. Patristic and Text-Critical Studies: The Collected Essays of William L. Petersen. Brill: Leiden. p. 229. link.
  7. Davies, W.D., Allison, D.C. A Critical and Exegetical Commentary on the Gospel According to Saint Matthew. T&T Clark, 1988-1997, 3 vols. link. [vol 3, p. 241.]
  8. Crandall University. Pauline anthropology. .
  9. Augustine through the Ages (1999), p. 582.
  10. Saint Augustine of Hippo, De Trinitate , 10, 11; Encyclopedia of Christian Theology, Volume 1 (2004), page 54. See Saint Augustine of Hippo, De Trinitate, 14. Saint Thomas Aquinas, OP explains that Saint Augustine does not identify these 3 features as "powers" of the soul. Saint Thomas Aquinas, OP, Summa Theologiae, Prima Pars, Q. 79, A. 7, ad 1.
  11. Saint John of the Cross, OCD, Doctor, The Ascent of Mount Carmel, Book 2, Chapter 6, §1.
  12. "St. Albertus Magnus" in the Catholic Encyclopedia. Eprint.
  13. 1 2 3 4 5 See The Pocket Aquinas (1991).
  14. "Francis Bacon, Viscount Saint Alban", Britannica.com Eprint
  15. Redding, Paul (1997, 2006), "Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. Eprint.
  16. McDonald, William (1996, 2009), "Søren Kierkegaard" in the Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy. See Section 6.
  17. Klement, Kevin C. (2005), "Gottlob Frege (1848—1925)", Internet Encyclopedia of Philosophy.
  18. Joyce, James (1914-1915), A Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man , see Chapter 5, especially (but not only) lines 8215-8221.
  19. Popper, Karl (1982), The Open Universe: An Argument for Indeterminism.
  20. Zukofsky, Louis, "A" 12 (1966), and Prepositions (1967, 1981), p. 55.
  21. 1 2 Merleau-Ponty, Maurice (1942), La structure du comportement, and published in English as The Structure of Behavior.

§The list of trichotomies featuring different philosophers was initially influenced by Herb O. Buckland's List which was placed on the Wikipedia years ago but subsequently removed because a complaint was raised about credit not being given to the original author. The original list is here: https://www.threesology.org/3s-poster-5.php. Credit needs to be given where it is due.

Related Research Articles

In ontology, the theory of categories concerns itself with the categories of being: the highest genera or kinds of entities. To investigate the categories of being, or simply categories, is to determine the most fundamental and the broadest classes of entities. A distinction between such categories, in making the categories or applying them, is called an ontological distinction. Various systems of categories have been proposed, they often include categories for substances, properties, relations, states of affairs or events. A representative question within the theory of categories might articulate itself, for example, in a query like, "Are universals prior to particulars?"

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel</span> German philosopher (1770–1831)

Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel was a German philosopher and one of the most influential figures of German idealism and 19th-century philosophy. His influence extends across the entire range of contemporary philosophical topics, from metaphysical issues in epistemology and ontology, to political philosophy, the philosophy of history, philosophy of art, philosophy of religion, and the history of philosophy.

Idealism in philosophy, also known as philosophical idealism or metaphysical idealism, is the set of metaphysical perspectives asserting that, most fundamentally, reality is equivalent to mind, spirit, or consciousness; that reality is entirely a mental construct; or that ideas are the highest type of reality or have the greatest claim to being considered "real". Because there are different types of idealism, it is difficult to define the term uniformly.

In logic, the law of non-contradiction (LNC) states that contradictory propositions cannot both be true in the same sense at the same time, e. g. the two propositions "the house is white" and "the house is not white" are mutually exclusive. Formally, this is expressed as the tautology ¬(p ∧ ¬p). For example it is tautologous to say "the house is not both white and not white" since this results from putting "the house is white" in that formula, yielding "not ", then rewriting this in natural English. The law is not to be confused with the law of excluded middle which states that at least one of two propositions like "the house is white" and "the house is not white" holds.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Omnipotence</span> Quality of having unlimited power

Omnipotence is the quality of having unlimited power. Monotheistic religions generally attribute omnipotence only to the deity of their faith. In the monotheistic religious philosophy of Abrahamic religions, omnipotence is often listed as one of God's characteristics, along with omniscience, omnipresence, and omnibenevolence. The presence of all these properties in a single entity has given rise to considerable theological debate, prominently including the problem of evil, the question of why such a deity would permit the existence of evil. It is accepted in philosophy and science that omnipotence can never be effectively understood.

Truth or verity is the property of being in accord with fact or reality. In everyday language, it is typically ascribed to things that aim to represent reality or otherwise correspond to it, such as beliefs, propositions, and declarative sentences.

Dialectic, also known as the dialectical method, refers originally to dialogue between people holding different points of view about a subject but wishing to arrive at the truth through reasoned argumentation. Dialectic resembles debate, but the concept excludes subjective elements such as emotional appeal and rhetoric. It has its origins in ancient philosophy and continued to be developed in the Middle Ages.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aristotelianism</span> Philosophical tradition inspired by the work of Aristotle

Aristotelianism is a philosophical tradition inspired by the work of Aristotle, usually characterized by deductive logic and an analytic inductive method in the study of natural philosophy and metaphysics. It covers the treatment of the social sciences under a system of natural law. It answers why-questions by a scheme of four causes, including purpose or teleology, and emphasizes virtue ethics. Aristotle and his school wrote tractates on physics, biology, metaphysics, logic, ethics, aesthetics, poetry, theatre, music, rhetoric, psychology, linguistics, economics, politics, and government. Any school of thought that takes one of Aristotle's distinctive positions as its starting point can be considered "Aristotelian" in the widest sense. This means that different Aristotelian theories may not have much in common as far as their actual content is concerned besides their shared reference to Aristotle.

In most contexts, the concept of good denotes the conduct that should be preferred when posed with a choice between possible actions. Good is generally considered to be the opposite of evil and is of ethics, morality, philosophy, and religion. The specific meaning and etymology of the term and its associated translations among ancient and contemporary languages show substantial variation in its inflection and meaning, depending on circumstances of place and history, or of philosophical or religious context.

<i>Critique of Pure Reason</i> 1781 book by Immanuel Kant

The Critique of Pure Reason is a book by the German philosopher Immanuel Kant, in which the author seeks to determine the limits and scope of metaphysics. Also referred to as Kant's "First Critique", it was followed by his Critique of Practical Reason (1788) and Critique of Judgment (1790). In the preface to the first edition, Kant explains that by a "critique of pure reason" he means a critique "of the faculty of reason in general, in respect of all knowledge after which it may strive independently of all experience" and that he aims to decide on "the possibility or impossibility of metaphysics".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bernard Bosanquet (philosopher)</span> English philosopher and political theorist (1848–1923)

Bernard Bosanquet was an English philosopher and political theorist, and an influential figure on matters of political and social policy in the late 19th and early 20th centuries. His work influenced but was later subject to criticism by many thinkers, notably Bertrand Russell, John Dewey, William James and Ludwig Wittgenstein. Bernard was the husband of Helen Bosanquet, the leader of the Charity Organisation Society.

In semiotics, a sign is anything that communicates a meaning that is not the sign itself to the interpreter of the sign. The meaning can be intentional, as when a word is uttered with a specific meaning, or unintentional, as when a symptom is taken as a sign of a particular medical condition. Signs can communicate through any of the senses, visual, auditory, tactile, olfactory, or taste.

<i>The Phenomenology of Spirit</i> 1807 book by Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel

The Phenomenology of Spirit is the most widely discussed philosophical work of Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel; its German title can be translated as either The Phenomenology of Spirit or The Phenomenology of Mind. Hegel described the work, published in 1807, as an "exposition of the coming to be of knowledge". This is explicated through a necessary self-origination and dissolution of "the various shapes of spirit as stations on the way through which spirit becomes pure knowledge".

Summum bonum is a Latin expression meaning the highest or ultimate good, which was introduced by the Roman philosopher Cicero to denote the fundamental principle on which some system of ethics is based — that is, the aim of actions, which, if consistently pursued, will lead to the best possible life. Since Cicero, the expression has acquired a secondary meaning as the essence or ultimate metaphysical principle of Goodness itself, or what Plato called the Form of the Good. These two meanings do not necessarily coincide. For example, Epicurean and Cyrenaic philosophers claimed that the 'good life' consistently aimed for pleasure, without suggesting that pleasure constituted the meaning or essence of Goodness outside the ethical sphere. In De finibus, Cicero explains and compares the ethical systems of several schools of Greek philosophy, including Stoicism, Epicureanism, Aristotelianism and Platonism, based on how each defines the ethical summum bonum differently.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Representation (arts)</span> Signs that stand in for and take the place of something else

Representation is the use of signs that stand in for and take the place of something else. It is through representation that people organize the world and reality through the act of naming its elements. Signs are arranged in order to form semantic constructions and express relations.

Romanian philosophy is a name covering either:

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Semiotic theory of Charles Sanders Peirce</span>

Charles Sanders Peirce began writing on semiotics, which he also called semeiotics, meaning the philosophical study of signs, in the 1860s, around the time that he devised his system of three categories. During the 20th century, the term "semiotics" was adopted to cover all tendencies of sign researches, including Ferdinand de Saussure's semiology, which began in linguistics as a completely separate tradition.

Western philosophy refers to the philosophical thought, traditions and works of the Western world. Historically, the term refers to the philosophical thinking of Western culture, beginning with the ancient Greek philosophy of the pre-Socratics. The word philosophy itself originated from the Ancient Greek philosophía (φιλοσοφία), literally, "the love of wisdom" Ancient Greek: φιλεῖν phileîn, "to love" and σοφία sophía, "wisdom".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medieval philosophy</span> Philosophy during the medieval period

Medieval philosophy is the philosophy that existed through the Middle Ages, the period roughly extending from the fall of the Western Roman Empire in the 5th century until after the Renaissance in the 13th and 14th centuries. Medieval philosophy, understood as a project of independent philosophical inquiry, began in Baghdad, in the middle of the 8th century, and in France and Germany, in the itinerant court of Charlemagne in Aachen, in the last quarter of the 8th century. It is defined partly by the process of rediscovering the ancient culture developed in Greece and Rome during the Classical period, and partly by the need to address theological problems and to integrate sacred doctrine with secular learning. This is one of the defining characteristics in this time period. Understanding God was the focal point of study of the philosophers at that time, Muslim and Christian alike.

The following is a list of the major events in the history of German idealism, along with related historical events.