Zionism in the Age of the Dictators is one of two works by Brenner on the alleged collaboration between Zionism and Nazism. Brenner returns to this topic in his 2002 work 51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis.
Argument of the book
For Brenner, Zionism emerged from within 19th century conservative nationalism, sharing with it both its ideology of Blut und Boden and its racist assumptions. Like classic antisemites, early Zionists,[a] he claims, considered antisemitism to be the fault of Jews themselves, as putative rootless "intruders" trying to assimilate and exploiting socialist movements to do so. Only in Palestine, Zionists argued, could Jews become a healthy race.[b]
Brenner notes that Theodor Herzl himself confided to his diary that he tried to win over Germany's Kaiser Wilhelm to Zionism by arguing that the movement would subtract Jews from revolutionary parties by relocating them abroad. Zionism's contempt for socialism led its leaders to repeatedly cooperate with conservative nationalist movements to suppress this perceived threat.[3][4][1]
Brenner charges that the World Zionist Organization's abandonment of the idea that Jews in the diaspora were worth helping played a consequential role in the fate that later befel the Jews.[3][5] To this end he cites several documents, one of which is a memorandum of the Zionist Federation of Germany sent to the Nazi Party soon after Hitler became Chancellor. In it German Zionists undertook to ensure that Jews would thenceforth avoid "becoming the rootless critics of the national foundations of German essence," for
a rebirth of national life, such as is occurring in German life through adhesion to Christian and national values, must also take place in the Jewish national group.
Zionists, in Brenner's interpretation, were so intent on colonizing Palestine with Jews, that they prioritized emigration there over any other form of rescuing Jews. To this end, Brenner cites a remark made by David Ben-Gurion in the wake of Kristallnacht when great Britain laid out a proposal to convey thousands of Jewish children at risk to the safety of its shores. Ben-Gurion commented
If I knew that it would be possible to save all the children in Germany by bringing them over to England, and only half of them by transporting them to Eretz Yisrael, then I would opt for the second alternative.[3][9]
Likewise, in the United States in 1943 Brenner states that rabbi Stephen Wise opposed a congressional bill designed to create a rescue commission for Jews because it failed to mention Palestine.[3][10]
Brenner concludes his book by a chapter on the Stern gang – which had broken away from the Irgun – and its efforts to forge an alliance with the Nazis against Great Britain, on the basis that the gang viewed itself as a totalitarian nationalist movement in the German mould. Suppressed as a terrorist group during the war, the reviewer notes, in the postwar era, one of its leaders, Yitzhak Shamir rose to become Prime Minister of Israel, and the former Irgun militant, Menachem Begin, on becoming Prime Minister, honoured the gang's founder, Avraham Stern by having a postage stamp with his portrait printed.[3]
Positive reviews
Upon its initial publication the book received a positive review in The Times, with Edward Mortimer describing it as "crisp and carefully documented".[11]
An anonymous Merip reviewer, himself a refugee from the Holocaust, called the book extremely important, and "singular" in outlining an argument that Zionism with its intention of ensuring the survival of Jews interacted symbiotically with antisemites and movements rooted in extreme hatred of Jews. Brenner drew on ample[12] documentation whose contents were known, but existed only in obscure journals[c] and books that were otherwise difficult to access. He was nonetheless critical of Brenner's "hectoring second-guessing of nearly every move made by the Jewish leadership during the fascist and Nazi era", on the grounds that not many options existed in that phase of Jewish history. There was, he concludes, no need for "sledge-hammer moralizing" for "(w)e don't need it. The evidence compiled in this book speaks quite eloquently for itself."[3]
Writing for the Journal of Palestine Studies, Hilton Obenzinger prefaced his remarks by noting from personal experience the atmosphere of hostility that surrounded any attempt to address the Palestinian issue in public: rational debate quickly broke down into a "screaming bedlam".[d] Reading the book, he opines, will shake the moral credibility of Zionist claims to be defenders of the Jews. For Obenzinger Brenner's meticulous documentation expressed an intention to disarm criticism of a thesis that would be considered controversial, and ward off the "barrage of abuse" its publication would inevitably excite.[1]
Gilbert Achcar, surveying the literature on the period of interaction between Zionists and Germany, argues that both movements deeply disliked each other, each striving to use the other for their respective purposes, which crossed over in a common interest in removing Jews from Germany. While referring the reader to Brenner's work, which he appraises as a "vigorous indictment", he draws attention to Francis R. Nicosia's critique of Brenner's study.[13][14][e]
Negative reviews
C.C. Aronsfeld, of the Institute of Jewish Affairs in a review published in the journal International Affairs, criticized the book concluding that "Brenner has produced a party political tract that unhinges the balance of history by ignoring too many difficulties, especially psychological. For once Stalinists will be pleased with the work of a Trotskyist."[17]
In his review for The New Republic of Edwin Black's The Transfer Agreement, Eric Breindel accused Brenner of defaming Zionism, of misinterpreting the single Stern gang proposal, and also added that the Institute for Historical Review, which asserted that the Holocaust was a hoax, was promoting Brenner's work.[18] Brenner duly replied but The New Republic refused to publish his letter.[f]Alexander Cockburn, writing in defense of Brenner, stated that Breindel's insinuation that Brenner and the Institute for Historical Review were in sympathy flew in the face of the fact that Brenner acknowledged the slaughter of the Shoah and had publicly encouraged people to bust up meetings by that institute.[19]
Bryan Cheyette reviewed it for the journal Patterns of Prejudice.[20][g][21] He writes that the book was a "crude ...pseudo-scholarly" piece of left-wing revisionism, and classified it as an example of a trend towards "pathological anti-Zionism" that arose in the wake of the UN declaration (1975) equating racism and Zionism, which moreover Brenner indicts for failing to mobilize the working classes against antisemitism. Because Brenner does not discuss the Israeli-Palestinian conflict he is "fictionalizing Zionism". After listing and disagreeing with Brenner's estimations of several historical figures, Cheyette concludes by deploring in the strongest terms the fact that the book was distributed by a respectable British publisher.[22]
Criticism of Brenner from the left
Socialist writer Gerry Ben-Noah wrote a critical review for the Trotskyist Workers' Liberty. Ben-Noah argues that Brenner "creates a fantasy world in which the Zionists did wish for and expect the Holocaust, and in which the most fanatical Jewish nationalists were in reality, ardent anti-semites".[23] Highly critical of the argument that "Zionists saw anti-semites as nationalists like themselves with a common objective in the removal of Jews from Europe", Ben-Noah asks rhetorically, "Where does one begin to review work like this?"[23]
Brenner is on record since the 1980s as being highly critical of the exploitation of his research by neo-Nazi Holocaust deniers.[2][19] On the occasion of a controversy that broke out when the former Mayor of LondonKen Livingstone cited Brenner's book as the source for his view that Hitler supported Zionism,[h] both David Hirsh and the historian Thomas Weber lambasted Brenner's work, commenting that, in their view, it was a sourcebook for antizionists and anti-Semites, and lay outside the academic mainstream.[i] Weber also asserted that Brenner's book was not taken seriously by mainstream scholarship,[25] and that the Institute for Historical Review cited the book in their research.[2] David Rosenberg, Jewish anti-Zionist activist in the Jewish Socialists' Group, supporter of Jews for Justice for Palestinians, and a Labour Party member, stated that Zionism in the Age of the Dictators is "badly written and with poor scholarship – a piece of tabloid journalism glued together with selective facts and lots of conjecture".[24]
On being subsequently suspended from the Labour Party, Livingstone indicated that he intended to use Brenner's work when appealing his suspension.[2][26]
Influence
The book served as inspiration for the controversial 1987 play Perdition, which was cancelled due to allegations of antisemitism.[j] The playwright, Jim Allen, referred to the book as a "goldmine source".[27]David Cesarani, commenting on Allen's admission that Brenner's work was a key inspiration for his play, asserted that,
Many of his "facts" and "quotations" had been pre-selected and edited by Brenner to fit the well-established anti-Zionist argument that Israel is a "racist" state governed by a fascist (Yitzhak Shamir), the origins of which can be explicated by reference to parallels between Nazi and Zionist ideology and instances of concrete collaboration.[27]
Notes
↑ Brenner cites Chaim Weizmann's remark that, "we too are in agreement with the cultural anti-Semites, in so far as we believed that Germans of the Mosaic faith are an undesirable, demoralizing phenomena." (Brenner 1983, p.34, Obenzinger 1983, p.87)
↑ "If one believes in the validity of racial exclusiveness, it is difficult to object to anyone else's racism. If one believes further that it is impossible for any people to be healthy except in their own homeland, then one cannot object to anyone else excluding 'aliens' from their territory." (Brenner 1983, p.25, Obenzinger 1983, p.86)
↑ Speaking of the Ha'avara Agreement, Breindel remarks that, "It has been treated in various articles and relatively obscure books, (as well as in the best-known and most authoritative general study of the Holocaust, The War Against the Jews by Lucy Dawidowicz." (Breindel 1985, pp.39–40)
↑ "Any mention of Zionist collaboration with the Nazis, as anyone who has spoken about the Palestinian issue in public forums in the US can attest, can easily throw a rational meetingt into a screaming bedlam." (Obenzinger 1983, p.85)
↑ Brenner had earlier criticized Nicosia's detailed study The Third Reich and the Palestine Question: Germany's Relations with Zionism, Arab Nationalism and British Imperialism (1985), which mentions his own book only in the bibliography,[15] for its dispassionate attachment to dry archival minutiae at the expense of engaging in value judgments, though he assessed Nicosia's close focus on Nazi racist views on Jews and Arabs as of real value.[16]
↑ In a letter to the New Republic Brenner responded to Breindel's remarks, correcting the latter's assertion that the Stern gang had simply proposed the transfer of Jews to Palestine in exchange for an undertaking to rid Palestine of the British forces. The Stern gang's proposal, Brenner noted, actually offered to side with Nazi Germany on the basis of a perceived identity of national aims (Cockburn 1985, p.789).
↑ Brenner's book cited Hitler's remark in his Mein Kampf that there was: "a great movement... which came out sharply in confirmation of the national character of the Jews: this was the Zionists." (Brenner 1983, p.79, Obenzinger 1983, p.87) Livingstone argued that Zionism in the Age of the Dictators "confirms there was clearly an ongoing dialogue [between Zionists and Nazis] even if the Israeli government now tries to pretend that none of that all happened".(Quinn 2016); "Livingstone told the world that when 'Hitler won his election in 1932, his policy then was that Jews should be moved to Israel.' He added: 'He was supporting Zionism – this before he went mad and ended up killing six million Jews'."[24]
↑ "a fixture of antizionist and antisemitic propaganda about the Holocaust on both the far left and on the far right, and Brenner has a cult following among those convinced that 'Zionists' are to blame for all evil in the world." (Hirsh 2017); "Brenner's book lies well outside academic mainstream. It is mostly celebrated either by the extreme left and by the neo-Nazi right" (Quinn 2016).
↑ "Jim Allen was inspired by Brenner to write Perdition, a play which was produced at the Royal Court Theatre in 1987." (Hirsh 2017, p.16)
Greenstein, Tony (November 2014). "Zionist-Nazi Collaboration and the Holocaust: A Historical Aberration? Lenni Brenner Revisited". Holy Land Studies. 13 (2): 187–212. doi:10.3366/hls.2014.0089.
Miner, Samuel (Fall 2016). "Planning the Holocaust in the Middle East: Nazi Designs to Bomb Jewish Cities in Palestine". Jewish Political Studies Review. 27 (3/4): 7–33. JSTOR44510568.
Nicosia, Francis R. (1989). "Victims as Perpetrators: German Zionism and Collaboration in Recent Historical Controversy". In Bauer, Yehuda (ed.). Remembering for the Future: The Impact of the Holocaust on the Contemporary World. Vol.2. Pergamon Press. pp.2134–2148. ISBN978-0-080-36754-5.
Antisemitism has increased greatly in the Arab world since the beginning of the 20th century, for several reasons: the dissolution and breakdown of the Ottoman Empire and traditional Islamic society; European influence, brought about by Western imperialism and Arab Christians; Nazi propaganda and relations between Nazi Germany and the Arab world; resentment over Jewish nationalism; the rise of Arab nationalism; and the widespread proliferation of anti-Jewish and anti-Zionist conspiracy theories.
Soviet anti-Zionism is an anti-Zionist and pro-Arab doctrine promulgated in the Soviet Union during the Cold War. While the Soviet Union initially pursued a pro-Zionist policy after World War II due to its perception that the Jewish state would be socialist and pro-Soviet, its outlook on the Arab–Israeli conflict changed as Israel began to develop a close relationship with the United States and aligned itself with the Western Bloc.
Lenni Brenner, formerly known as Leonard Glaser or Lenny Glaser, is an American Trotskyist writer. In the 1960s, Brenner was a prominent civil rights movement activist and vocal opponent of the Vietnam War. Since the 1980s, his activism has focused on anti-Zionism. He has published widely on the history of Zionism, in particular asserting that the movement collaborated with the Nazis.
Haim Arlosoroff was a Socialist Zionist leader of the Yishuv during the British Mandate for Palestine, prior to the establishment of Israel, and Head of the Political Department of the Jewish Agency. In 1933, Arlosoroff was assassinated while walking on the beach with his wife in Tel Aviv.
The terms "self-hating Jew", "self-loathing Jew", and "auto-antisemite" are pejorative terms used to describe Jewish people whose viewpoints, especially favoring Jewish assimilation, Jewish secularism, limousine liberalism, or anti-Judaism are perceived as reflecting self-hatred.
Gilbert Achcar is a Lebanese socialist academic and writer. He is a Professor of Development Studies and International Relations at the School of Oriental and African Studies of the University of London.
Perdition is a 1987 stage play by Jim Allen. Its premiere at London's Royal Court Theatre Upstairs, in a production directed by Ken Loach, was abandoned because of protests, and criticism by two historians, over its controversial and tendentious claims.
The Haavara Agreement was an agreement between Nazi Germany and Zionist German Jews signed on 25 August 1933. The agreement was finalized after three months of talks by the Zionist Federation of Germany, the Anglo-Palestine Bank and the economic authorities of Nazi Germany. It was a major factor in making possible the migration of approximately 60,000 German Jews to Palestine between 1933 and 1939.
As an organized nationalist movement, Zionism is generally considered to have been founded by Theodor Herzl in 1897. However, the history of Zionism began earlier and is intertwined with Jewish history and Judaism. The organizations of Hovevei Zion, held as the forerunners of modern Zionist ideals, were responsible for the creation of 20 Jewish towns in Palestine between 1870 and 1897.
David Hirsh is a Senior Lecturer in Sociology at Goldsmiths, University of London, and co-founder of Engage, a campaign against the academic boycott of Israel.
Anti-Zionism is opposition to Zionism. Although anti-Zionism is a heterogeneous phenomenon, all its proponents agree that the creation of the modern State of Israel, and the movement to create a sovereign Jewish state in the region of Palestine—a region partly coinciding with the biblical Land of Israel—was flawed or unjust in some way.
Wir Juden is a 1934 book by German rabbi Joachim Prinz that concerns Hitler's rise to power as a demonstration of the defeat of liberalism and assimilation as a solution for the "Jewish Question", and advocated a Zionist alternative to save German Jews. The book urged German Jews to escape National Socialist persecution by emigrating to Palestine. Prinz himself was expelled in 1937, travelling to the US where he became a leader of the American Jewish community and the Civil Rights Movement.
Relations between Nazi Germany (1933–1945) and the Arab world ranged from indifference, fear, animosity, and confrontation to collaboration. In terms of confrontation, Arab liberal intellectuals and journalists played a pivotal role in resisting European totalitarianism and radicalism within the Arabic-speaking world, even as some liberal European leaders entertained compromises with fascist forces. A prominent journalist, addressing Arabic-speaking audiences, underscored the necessity of rejecting Hitler’s ideology in its entirety: “... if you treasure individual liberties and believe in the value of freedom – freedom of thought in literature, ethics, philosophy, and religion – then there is no doubt that you will hate the regime which supports economic efficiency over freedom, or in other words sacrifices the latter for the sake of realizing the former.” This statement also highlights a significant belief in the Arab world at the time: the deep value placed on individual freedoms. Still, Nazi Germany used collaborators and propaganda throughout the Arab world in search of alliance for their political goals. One foundation of such collaborations was the antisemitism of the Nazis, which was claimed to be shared by some Arab and Muslim leaders, most notably the exiled Palestinian leader, Grand Mufti of Jerusalem, Amin al-Husseini. Another foundation was the Nazi hostility towards the United Kingdom and France which held colonies in the Arab World. This hostility was used in Nazi propaganda to allege an anti-colonial common interest that Nazi Germany held. However this interest conflicted with interests of Nazi Germany's allies who held colonies in the Arab world, namely Spain, Vichy France and Italy, and thus had to manage competing interests in the region.
The Transfer Agreement: The Dramatic Story of the Pact Between the Third Reich and Jewish Palestine is a book written by author Edwin Black, documenting the transfer agreement between Zionist organizations and Nazi Germany to transfer a number of Jews and their assets to Palestine.
Leopold Itz, Edler von Mildenstein was an SS officer who is remembered as a lead supporter in the Nazi Party of some of the aims of Zionism during the 1930s.
This timeline of anti-Zionism chronicles the history of anti-Zionism, including events in the history of anti-Zionist thought.
51 Documents: Zionist Collaboration with the Nazis is a 2002 book by the American Trotskyist and anti-Zionist Lenni Brenner. The book presents 51 documents that Brenner argues show that Zionist leaders collaborated with fascism particularly in Nazi Germany in order to build up a Jewish presence in Palestine. The book continues themes explored in Brenner's earlier and highly controversial work Zionism in the Age of the Dictators.
Francis R. Nicosia was an American historian at the University of Vermont with a focus on modern history and Holocaust research.
Zionist antisemitism or antisemitic Zionism refers to a phenomenon in which antisemites express support for Zionism and the State of Israel. In some cases, this support may be promoted for explicitly antisemitic reasons. Historically, this type of antisemitism has been most notable among Christian Zionists, who may perpetrate religious antisemitism while being outspoken in their support for Jewish sovereignty in Israel due to their interpretation of Christian eschatology. Similarly, people who identify with the political far-right, particularly in Europe and the United States, may support the Zionist movement because they seek to expel Jews from their country and see Zionism as the least complicated method of achieving this goal and satisfying their racial antisemitism.
The exploitation of accusations of antisemitism, especially to counter anti-Zionism and criticism of Israel, may be described as weaponization of antisemitism, instrumentalization of antisemitism, or playing the antisemitism card. Bad-faith accusations against Israel's critics have been called a form of smear tactics. Some writers have compared them to playing the race card.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply. Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.
