1973 Paris Air Show Tu-144 crash

Last updated

1973 Paris Air Show Tu-144 crash
Tupolev Tu-144 CCCP-77102 LEB 02.06.73 edited-3.jpg
СССР-77102, the Tu-144S involved in the accident, seen at the 1973 Paris Air Show, the day before the accident
Accident
Date3 June 1973
SummaryCrashed after in-flight structural failure
Site Goussainville, Val-d'Oise
49°01′33″N2°28′28″E / 49.02583°N 2.47444°E / 49.02583; 2.47444
Total fatalities14
Total injuries60
Aircraft
Aircraft type Tupolev Tu-144S
Operator Aeroflot
Registration СССР-77102
Flight origin Paris–Le Bourget Airport
DestinationParis–Le Bourget Airport
Occupants6
Crew6
Fatalities6
Survivors0
Ground casualties
Ground fatalities8
Ground injuries60

The 1973 Paris Air Show Tu-144 crash of Sunday 3 June 1973 destroyed the second production model of the Russian supersonic Tupolev Tu-144. The aircraft disintegrated in the air while performing extreme manoeuvres and fell on the town of Goussainville, Val-d'Oise, France, killing all six crew members and eight people on the ground. [1] [2] [3] The crash ended the development program of the Tupolev Tu-144. [4] The official inquest did not conclusively determine the cause of the accident and several theories have been proposed.

Contents

Accident

SSSR-77102, the Tupolev Tu-144S involved in the accident, photographed May 1973, the month before the crash RIAN archive 368835 A Tupolev Tu-144 supersonic transport in mid-air.jpg
СССР-77102, the Tupolev Tu-144S involved in the accident, photographed May 1973, the month before the crash

The aircraft involved was Tupolev Tu-144S СССР-77102, manufacturer's serial number 01–2, the second production Tu-144. [5] It was first flown on 29 March 1972. [6] This aircraft had been modified compared to the initial prototype to include landing gear that retracted into the nacelles and retractable canards. [7] The pilot was Soviet test pilot Mikhail Vasilyevich Kozlov [8] and the co-pilot was Valery M. Molchanov. [9] Also on board were flight navigator G. N. Bazhenov; V. N. Benderov, deputy chief designer and engineer major-general; B. A. Pervukhin, senior engineer; and A. I. Dralin, flight engineer. [10] The crash occurred in front of 250,000 spectators near the end of the Paris Air Show at Le Bourget airport, the world's largest air show and aerospace industry exhibition event. [8] [11]

SSSR-77102 on the tarmac at Le Bourget while Concorde takes off in the background, 2 June 1973 06 Bourget TU144 (12).jpg
СССР-77102 on the tarmac at Le Bourget while Concorde takes off in the background, 2 June

During the show there had been "fierce competition between the Anglo-French Concorde and the Soviet Tu-144". [8] The Soviet pilot, Mikhail Kozlov, had bragged that he would outperform the Concorde. [8] "Just wait until you see us fly," he was quoted as saying. "Then you'll see something." [12] On the final day of the show, the Concorde, which was not yet in production, performed its demonstration flight first. [8] Its performance was later described as unexciting, and it has been suggested that Kozlov was determined to show how much better the Russian aircraft was. [12]

After several minutes in the air performing aerobatic manoeuvres in its second demonstration flight of the show, the Tu-144 flew a high-speed pass above the runway with the landing gear out and the "moustache" canards extended then, with all four engines at full power, it went into a steep and rapid climb. Below 2,000 ft (600 m) the aircraft stalled and fell into a steep dive. [8] As the pilot tried to pull out of the dive at 400ft with the engines at full power, "the entire left wing outboard of the left-hand engines broke away. The aircraft snap-rolled left and inverted, overload stresses fractured the fuselage forward of the wing, and fuel vapour ignited." [13] The aircraft broke apart in mid-air and crashed in flames on the town of Goussainville, eight kilometres north of Le Bourget, [8] [6] [9] destroying 15 houses [14] and killing all six people on board the Tu-144 and eight more on the ground. [6] Three children were among those killed and 60 people received severe injuries. [15]

Aftermath

The crew of the Tu-144 were buried at the Novodevichy Cemetery in Moscow on 12 June 1973. [16]

Following the crash, Marcel Dassault called for the 1975 Paris Air Show to be held at Istres, which is situated in open country 40 km (25 mi) northwest of Marseille. [17]

The crash eroded enthusiasm surrounding the Tu-144, which was already in decline. Although not a major factor within the Soviet Union, environmental concerns about the supersonic transport (SST) concept were increasing in the West. [18] Earlier in the year, government agencies in the U.S. and U.K. had issued forecasts that SST per-seat operating costs would substantially exceed those of conventional airliners for the foreseeable future, and a U.K. government report said the Tu-144 would have even higher per-seat operating costs than Concorde. [19] Historian Howard Moon speculates that these factors—together with continuing technical problems, an overextended Tupolev design bureau, high development costs coupled with a scarcity of alternate applications for Tu-144 technologies, and high fuel prices in the West stemming from the 1973 oil crisis a few months later—prompted Soviet leaders to deprioritize the aircraft's service entry with Aeroflot, as its value as a prestigious symbol of Soviet technical prowess had diminished. [20]

By 1975, the Soviet aviation industry had pivoted to promotion of new conventional subsonic airliners, the Yakovlev Yak-42 and Ilyushin Il-86. [21] Restrictions on the Tu-144 following the Paris Air Show crash meant that it only saw limited service during 1977 and 1978, and it was finally withdrawn following another crash in May 1978. [5] The Tu-144's rival, the Concorde, went on to serve with British Airways and Air France for 30 years afterwards, being finally withdrawn from service in 2003 due to low passenger numbers following the crash of Flight 4590 (coincidentally also within the vicinity of Le Bourget), rising service costs and the slump in the aviation industry following the September 11 attacks. [22]

Causes

Investigation

The accident was investigated by the DTCE, part of the French military, which was responsible for accidents involving prototype aircraft in France. The wreckage was recovered to a hangar at Le Bourget, with some of it being flown by an Antonov An-22 to the Soviet Union. [9] Moon writes that the investigation was clouded by political considerations from the outset; the Soviets were distrustful of the French proposal to reconstruct the wreckage in the hangar, being unfamiliar with the technique, and the French had been actively seeking Concorde overflight rights in the Soviet Union. An exoneration of the Tu-144 from a technical and design standpoint was in the political interests of both countries. [23] Throughout the investigation, the Soviets strenuously objected behind the scenes against French attempts to issue firm conclusions. [24] The official report from the French investigative commission, produced in collaboration with Soviet experts, proposed a hypothesis involving a French jet plane in proximity and an unsecured Tu-144 crew member with a film camera, which might have inadvertently blocked the controls during an evasion manoeuvre. However, due to a lack of concrete evidence supporting this theory, the commission concluded that the exact cause of the disaster remains undetermined. [25] At the same time, the report specifically stated that there was "no abnormality in either the airliner's design or the general functioning of the aircraft and its systems", and it ruled out inadequate structural design as a cause. [26] While the investigation's outcome was largely suitable for both sides, it gave rise to a number of alternative theories. [27]

Theories

Flight profile of Tu-144 and Mirage IIIR Tu144 Le Bourget en.svg
Flight profile of Tu-144 and Mirage IIIR
A French Dassault Mirage IIIR fighter jet. Shortly before the accident, a Mirage IIIR had taken off from the airport. A Soviet-promoted theory for the incident suggests that the Tu-144 swerved to avoid the Mirage and lost control, breaking up before impacting the ground. Dassault Mirage IIIR.jpg
A French Dassault Mirage IIIR fighter jet. Shortly before the accident, a Mirage IIIR had taken off from the airport. A Soviet-promoted theory for the incident suggests that the Tu-144 swerved to avoid the Mirage and lost control, breaking up before impacting the ground.

One Soviet-promoted theory is that the Tu-144 maneuvered to avoid a French Mirage chase plane that was attempting to photograph its unique canards, [28] which were advanced for the time, and that the French and Soviet governments colluded with each other to cover up break-up of the plane during a pull-up maneuver. [15] The flight of the Mirage was denied in the original French report of the incident,[ citation needed ] perhaps because it was engaged in industrial espionage. More recent reports have admitted the existence of the Mirage (and the fact that the Soviet crew were not told about the Mirage's flight), although not its role in the crash. However, the official press release did state: "though the inquiry established that there was no real risk of collision between the two aircraft, the Soviet pilot was likely to have been surprised". [15]

Moon stresses that last-minute changes to the flight schedule, combined with "sloppy" air traffic control, would have disoriented the pilots in a cockpit with notably poor sightlines; Moon notes that the flight crew had prepared a choreographed flight demonstration routine that had been practiced at least six times before leaving the Soviet Union, but it had to be discarded because of the scheduling changes. [29] He also cites an eyewitness who claims the co-pilot had agreed to take a camera with him, which he may have been operating at the time of the evasive maneuver. [15] [25] The initial approach may have been an attempted landing on the wrong runway, which occurred due to a last-minute shortening of the Tu-144's display. [30]

An important contributing factor could be that control surfaces deflection had been de-restricted before the flight, perhaps to allow a more impressive demonstration, giving way for a bug of the electronics flight controls which deflected the elevons 10 degrees down after the retraction of the canards, causing the sudden dive. [6]

On 24 October 1973, the London Daily Telegraph published a report stating that a wrench fell into the recess around the control stick, jamming the aircraft flight control system. [31]

A self-styled group calling itself "Liberation of Rudolf Hess" claimed to have blown up the Tu-144 in protest of Hess's continued imprisonment at Spandau Prison; however, Hess's son rejected this claim, saying that he had never heard of the group. [26]

Bob Hoover, a pilot on the supersonic Bell X-1 program, believed that the rivalry of the Tu-144 and Concorde had led the pilot of the Tu-144 to attempt a manoeuvre that went beyond the abilities of the aircraft: "That day, the Concorde went first, and after the pilot performed a high-speed flyby, he pulled up steeply and climbed to approximately 10,000 [feet] before leveling off. When the Tu-144 pilot performed the same manoeuvre he pulled the nose up so steeply I didn't believe he could possibly recover." [30]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concorde</span> British–French supersonic airliner

Concorde is a retired Anglo-French supersonic airliner jointly developed and manufactured by Sud Aviation and the British Aircraft Corporation (BAC). Studies started in 1954, and France and the United Kingdom signed a treaty establishing the development project on 29 November 1962, as the programme cost was estimated at £70 million . Construction of the six prototypes began in February 1965, and the first flight took off from Toulouse on 2 March 1969. The market was predicted for 350 aircraft, and the manufacturers received up to 100 option orders from many major airlines. On 9 October 1975, it received its French Certificate of Airworthiness, and from the UK CAA on 5 December.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tupolev Tu-144</span> Soviet supersonic passenger airliner

The Tupolev Tu-144 is a Soviet supersonic passenger airliner designed by Tupolev in operation from 1968 to 1999.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Delta wing</span> Triangle shaped aircraft wing configuration

A delta wing is a wing shaped in the form of a triangle. It is named for its similarity in shape to the Greek uppercase letter delta (Δ).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Boeing 2707</span> Cancelled American supersonic passenger airliner

The Boeing 2707 was an American supersonic passenger airliner project during the 1960s. After winning a competition for a government-funded contract to build an American supersonic airliner, Boeing began development at its facilities in Seattle, Washington. The design emerged as a large aircraft with seating for 250 to 300 passengers and cruise speeds of approximately Mach 3. It was intended to be much larger and faster than competing supersonic transport (SST) designs such as Concorde.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supersonic transport</span> Airliner faster than the speed of sound

A supersonic transport (SST) or a supersonic airliner is a civilian supersonic aircraft designed to transport passengers at speeds greater than the speed of sound. To date, the only SSTs to see regular service have been Concorde and the Tupolev Tu-144. The last passenger flight of the Tu-144 was in June 1978 and it was last flown in 1999 by NASA. Concorde's last commercial flight was in October 2003, with a November 26, 2003 ferry flight being its last flight.

Supercruise is sustained supersonic flight of a supersonic aircraft without using afterburner. Many supersonic military aircraft are not capable of supercruise and can maintain Mach 1+ flight only in short bursts with afterburners. Aircraft such as the SR-71 Blackbird are designed to cruise at supersonic speed with afterburners enabled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Air France Flight 4590</span> 2000 plane crash of an Air France Concorde in Paris

On 25 July 2000, Air France Flight 4590, a Concorde passenger jet on an international charter flight from Paris to New York, crashed shortly after takeoff, killing all 109 people on board and four on the ground. It was the only fatal Concorde accident during its 27-year operational history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tupolev Tu-22</span> Soviet supersonic heavy bomber

The Tupolev Tu-22 was the first supersonic bomber to enter production in the Soviet Union. Manufactured by Tupolev, the Tu-22 entered service with Long-Range Aviation and Soviet Naval Aviation in the 1960s.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paris–Le Bourget Airport</span> General aviation and former commercial airport serving Paris, France

Paris–Le Bourget Airport is an airport located within portions of the communes of Le Bourget, Bonneuil-en-France, Dugny and Gonesse, 6 NM north-northeast of Paris, France.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Paris Air Show</span> Air show and aerospace-industry exhibition event

The Paris Air Show is a trade fair and air show held in odd years at Paris–Le Bourget Airport in France. Organized by the French aerospace industry's primary representative body, the Groupement des industries françaises aéronautiques et spatiales (GIFAS), it is the largest air show and aerospace-industry exhibition event in the world, measured by number of exhibitors and size of exhibit space, followed by UK's Farnborough Air Show, Dubai Air Show, and Singapore Airshow.

The maiden flight, also known as first flight, of an aircraft is the first occasion on which it leaves the ground under its own power. The same term is also used for the first launch of rockets.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jet Age</span> Period of aviation history

The Jet Age is a period in the history of aviation defined by the advent of aircraft powered by jet turbine engines and the social and cultural changes fostered by commercial jet travel.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Droop nose (aeronautics)</span> Foremost tip of an aircraft that improves runway visibility

The droop nose is a feature fitted to a small number of aircraft types so the nose of the aircraft can be lowered during takeoff and landing to improve the pilot's view of the ground below. This feature is used with a very-low aspect ratio wing such as a delta wing. It is installed in aircraft capable of supersonic speeds but is lowered only during low-speed operation such as takeoff and landing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supersonic aircraft</span> Aircraft that travels faster than the speed of sound

A supersonic aircraft is an aircraft capable of supersonic flight, that is, flying faster than the speed of sound. Supersonic aircraft were developed in the second half of the twentieth century. Supersonic aircraft have been used for research and military purposes, but only two supersonic aircraft, the Tupolev Tu-144 and the Concorde, ever entered service for civil use as airliners. Fighter jets are the most common example of supersonic aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Goussainville, Val-d'Oise</span> Commune in Île-de-France, France

Goussainville is a commune in the department of Val-d'Oise, northern France. It is located 20.6 km (12.8 mi) north-northeast from the centre of Paris, near Charles de Gaulle Airport. Goussainville is part of the urban unit (agglomeration) of Paris.

The period between 1945 and 1979 is sometimes called the post-war era or the period of the post-war political consensus. During this period, aviation was dominated by the arrival of the Jet Age. In civil aviation the jet engine allowed a huge expansion of commercial air travel, while in military aviation it led to the widespread introduction of supersonic aircraft.

Soviet industrial espionage of the Concorde programme is alleged to have been carried out from 1959 to 1976. Not all allegations have been verified, but documents from Sud Aviation and BAC development did reach Soviet hands.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1978 Yegoryevsk Tu-144 crash</span> 1978 Soviet aircraft accident

The 1978 Yegoryevsk Tu-144 crash occurred during a test flight of a Tupolev Tu-144 on 23 May 1978. The aircraft suffered a fuel leak, which led to an in-flight fire in the right wing, forcing the shutdown of two of the aircraft's four engines. One of the two remaining engines subsequently failed, forcing the crew to make a belly landing in a field near Yegoryevsk, Moscow Oblast. Two flight engineers were killed in the ensuing crash, but the remaining six crew members survived. The accident prompted a ban on passenger flights of the Tu-144, which had already been beset by numerous problems, leading to a lack of interest that ultimately resulted in the Tu-144 program's cancellation.

Mikhail Vasilyevich Kozlov was a Soviet test pilot who received the title Hero of the Soviet Union and Honoured Test Pilot of the USSR for his work. As the co-pilot on the maiden flight of the Tu-144, he was one of very few pilots to fly the Tupolev Tu-144 supersonic airliner, and was given the honor of flying it at the 1973 Paris Airshow. He died when the Tu-144 crashed during its display. The cause of the crash remains disputed.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Concorde histories and aircraft on display</span>

Twenty Concorde aircraft were built: two prototypes, two pre-production aircraft, two development aircraft and 14 production aircraft for commercial service. With the exception of two of the production aircraft, all are preserved, mostly in museums. One aircraft was scrapped in 1994, and another was destroyed in the Air France Flight 4590 crash in 2000.

References

Citations

  1. ↑ "Russian SST crashes". Spokesman-Review. (Spokane, Washington, U.S.). Associated Press. 4 June 1973. p. 1.
  2. ↑ "Soviet SST crash kills 14". Milwaukee Sentinel. (Wisconsin, U.S.). UPI. 4 June 1973. p. 1.[ permanent dead link ]
  3. ↑ "15 killed as Russia's Concorde explodes". Glasgow Herald. 4 June 1973. p. 1.
  4. ↑ " Crash of the Tupolev 144 on 3 June 1973 video." ORTF, 8:00 p.m. news broadcasting, 3 June 1973, on the INA website , ina.fr.
  5. 1 2 Greenwood, John T. (1998). "The Designers and their Aircraft". In Robin D. S. Higham; John T. Greenwood; Von Hardesty (eds.). Russian aviation and air power in the twentieth century. Routledge. p. 174. ISBN   978-0-7146-4784-5.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Ranter, Harro. "СССР-77102 Accident description". aviation-safety.net. Aviation Safety Network. Retrieved 26 December 2010.
  7. ↑ Owen, Kenneth (2001). "The rivals". Concorde: story of a supersonic pioneer. Science Museum. p. 154. ISBN   978-1-900747-42-4.
  8. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Gunston, Bill (7 June 1973). "Concordski and Concorde". New Scientist. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
  9. 1 2 3 "Tu-144 crash investigation". Flight International: 908. 14 June 1973.
  10. ↑ "Once Upon a Time". Kommersant. 3 June 2006. Archived from the original on 12 October 2012. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
  11. ↑ Peter Shaw-Smith (8 November 2017). "2017 Dubai Airshow Expected To Be Largest Yet". AIN. Archived from the original on 10 November 2017. Retrieved 10 November 2017.
  12. 1 2 "DISASTERS: Deadly Exhibition". Time. 18 June 1973. Archived from the original on 7 December 2008.
  13. ↑ David Kaminski Morrow (20 June 2023). "Flight Global: Tu-144 crash puzzle persists 50 years after fatal Paris display" . Retrieved 12 July 2024.
  14. ↑ "Paris Air Show: 100 years of Paris air show highlights". Flightglobal. 5 June 2009. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
  15. 1 2 3 4 "Supersonic Spies." (unreliable source) Nova PBS air date: 27 January 1998.
  16. ↑ "Tu-144 investigation continues". Flight International. 103 (3354): 938. 21 June 1973. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
  17. ↑ "Display dangers". Flight International. 103 (3353): 910. 14 June 1973.
  18. ↑ Moon 1989, p. 168.
  19. ↑ Moon 1989, pp. 171–172.
  20. ↑ Moon 1989, pp. 168–170.
  21. ↑ Moon 1989, pp. 170, 173.
  22. ↑ "Concorde grounded for good". BBC News. 10 April 2003. Retrieved 9 September 2020.
  23. ↑ Moon 1989, pp. 159, 171.
  24. ↑ Moon 1989, pp. 159–160.
  25. 1 2 Moon 1989, pp. 160–161.
  26. 1 2 Moon 1989, p. 171.
  27. 1 2 Bliznyuk, Valentin; et al. (2000). "3.14. Катастрофа самолета Ту-144 (бортовой номер 77102) в Париже". Правда о сверхзвуковых пассажирских самолетах [Reality of supersonic passenger airplanes] (in Russian). Moscow: Moskovsky Rabochiy. ISBN   5-239-02044-2.
  28. ↑ Smith, Patrick (24 June 2005). "Ask the pilot". Salon. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
  29. ↑ Moon 1989, pp. 160, 162.
  30. 1 2 Zarakohvich, Yuri (7 August 2000). "The Concordski TU-144: A blast from the past". Time Europe. Archived from the original on 15 August 2000. Retrieved 27 December 2010.
  31. ↑ Moon 1989, p. 160.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.