Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023

Last updated

Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023
Coat of arms of Uganda.svg
Parliament of Uganda
  • An Act to prohibit any form of sexual relations between persons of the same sex; to prohibit the promotion or recognition of sexual relations between persons of the same sex; and for related matters.
CitationAct No. 6 of 2023
Territorial extentUganda
Passed byParliament of Uganda
Passed21 March 2023
Assented to by Yoweri Museveni
Assented to26 May 2023
Vetoed20 April 2023
Type of vetoPackage
Veto overridden2 May 2023
Commenced30 May 2023
Legislative history
Bill citationAnti-Homosexuality Bill, 2023
Introduced by Asuman Basalirwa (JEEMA)
Introduced3 March 2023
Committee responsibleLegal and Parliamentary Affairs
Considered by the Legal and Parliamentary Affairs Committee9 March 2023
Second reading 21 March 2023
Third reading 21 March 2023
Reconsidered by the Parliament of Uganda after veto2 May 2023
Voting summary
  • 348 voted for
  • 1 voted against
  • 208 absent
Summary
Under the act, 'aggravated homosexuality' is punishable by death, and 'promotion' (including advocacy of 'normalisation') of homosexuality is punishable by fines and imprisonment for up to 20 years.
Status: Not fully in force

The Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2023 is an act of the Parliament of Uganda that restricts freedom of speech on LGBT civil rights and introduces harsher penalties for certain types of homosexual acts. On 21 March 2023, the bill was read a third time, and was then sent to President Yoweri Museveni for assent. [1] On 21 April 2023, Museveni returned it to Parliament, [2] which passed it again with minor amendments on 2 May. On 26 May, Museveni signed the bill. [3] [4]

Contents

The act prescribes life imprisonment for sex between two people of the same biological sex and the death penalty for "aggravated homosexuality". The latter offence includes "serial offenders", same-sex rape, sex in a position of authority or procured by intimidation, sex with persons older than seventy-five, sex with the disabled and mentally ill, and homosexual acts committed by a person with a previous conviction of homosexuality. Further, under its provisions, the promotion (including normalisation) of homosexuality is punishable by imprisonment for up to 20 years and fines.

The bill is highly popular within Uganda according to polls, and was voted for nearly unanimously by Parliament. [5] The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, and the European Union, and several local and international NGOs have condemned it.

Background

Anti-Homosexuality Act of 2014

In December 2013, the Parliament of Uganda passed an act prohibiting sexual relations between persons of the same sex. The act was previously called the "Kill the Gays bill" in the western mainstream media due to death penalty clauses proposed in the original version, [6] [7] [8] [9] but the penalty was later amended to life imprisonment. The bill was signed into law by the President of Uganda Yoweri Museveni on 24 February 2014. [10] [11] On 1 August 2014, however, the Constitutional Court of Uganda ruled the act invalid on procedural grounds. [12] [13] [14]

Sexual Offences Bill of 2021

In May 2021, the Parliament of Uganda passed a bill that consolidated a number of previous laws regarding sexual offences, introduced some provisions toward addressing sexual violence, and criminalised same-sex relationships. The bill was vetoed by President Museveni on 18 August 2021, who suggested much of its content is already covered by existing legislation. [15] [16] [17]

Provisions and passage

Bill as introduced

On 28 February 2023, parliament granted Asuman Basalirwa leave to introduce the Anti-Homosexuality Bill. [18] The memorandum to the bill [19] stated that its object was to 'establish a comprehensive and enhanced legislation to protect the traditional family' by

The memorandum further said that the bill sought to address 'gaps' in existing legislation, which did not clearly provide for 'charging, investigating, prosecuting, convicting and sentencing' of offenders under then existing prohibitions of homosexuality.

The bill, as introduced:

Consideration in committee

On 9 March 2023, the bill was referred to the Committee on Legal and Parliamentary Affairs of parliament. [38] The committee was divided. Two members, Fox Odoi-Oywelowo and Paul Kwizera Bucyana, issued a minority report, dissenting from the majority of thirty members. [39]

The majority found that 'the prohibition against homosexuality is entrenched in the laws of Uganda and our cherished and shared cultural norms and values.' [40] It found that the media had 'recently been awash with reports of sodomy and lesbianism in Ugandan schools' and that 'grooming and recruitment of school children into homosexuality has taken shape in Uganda'. [40] It further found that 'a number of non-governmental organisations have been found to promote the normalisation of same sex relations'. [40] Chapter Four Uganda, which submitted evidence to the committee, said to the BBC that "[w]hether you're heterosexual or homosexual, the government and parliament should introduce laws, or at least implement existing laws that protect all children – boys, girls from defilement. So the issue of recruitment has been unproven, it is baseless, it is biased." [41]

In evidence submitted to the committee, several NGOs and legal academics submitted that the provisions of the bill were either unconstitutional or redundant. [42] The Director of Public Prosecutions submitted that the provisions of the bill should be made as amendments to the Penal Code to avoid fragmentation of the statute book. [42] The majority responded that '[h]omosexuality is a unique offence', and cited the example of legislation specially dealing with terrorism and corruption. [42] The majority further found section 145 of the Penal Code to be inadequate. [42] It found that it failed to prohibit oral sex or use of 'contraption[s]' other than 'sexual organ[s]', did not define 'carnal knowledge' and 'the order of nature', failed to prohibit identification as transgender, queer, or LGBTQ, and failed to prohibit 'promotion of same sex sexual acts', allowing LGBTQ advocacy. [42]

The minority dissented on this point. [43] It said that many of the acts above were prohibited by section 145 read with the 'general prohibition on conspiracies under Chapter XLI of the Penal Code…(conspiracy to commit felony, conspiracy to commit misdemeanor[sic] and other conspiracies)', and the same case the majority later used to justify the criminalisation of homosexuality as a demonstration that existing legislation provided for 'acts that tend to promote homosexuality'. [43] The minority considered the bill, therefore, be unnecessary, and suggested that 'anti-homosexual sentiment' without clear evidence had motivated its introduction. [43]

The minority further argued that the interaction of the bill with other legislation was undesirable. In particular, sections 2 or 3 prohibiting the 'offence of homosexuality' and 'offence of aggravated homosexuality' effectively duplicated provisions of the Penal Code prohibiting rape and defilement but weakened the penalty from death or life imprisonment to ten years' imprisonment. [44]

On other evidence, the bill was unconstitutional or contravened human rights. The majority found that international human rights law did not supersede 'the supreme law of Uganda', viz., the constitution, and suggested that prohibition of homosexuality was in the 'public interest'. [45] It cited the proscription of a workshop by the High Court on the gay rights and its justification in the name of 'national security and public order and public interest[sic]'. [45]

The minority dissented on this point too. It said that criminalisation of homosexuality 'denies…equal protection under the law' and creates 'harsh differential treatment'. [44] In particular, the minority held that [44]

The committee received evidence on the question of whether homosexuality was 'a result of nature or nurture'. [47] The majority held that 'homosexuality is mainly an acquired and learnt sexual practice, with little or no influence from nature', except for a few genetically caused cases of 'unusual expressions of physical phenotypic expression associated with the genital organs'. [47]

In its analysis of the bill, the majority was concerned that sections 1 and 2 gave differing definitions of homosexuality. [48] For example, section 1 would not require 'penetration of the anus or mouth' but section 2 would. [48] Neither provision would supersede the definition of 'unnatural offences' in the Penal Code. The majority suggested that these conflicting definitions could lead to unconstitutional vagueness. [48] It, therefore, proposed harmonisation of each of the definitions. [48]

The majority further found that the 'offence of aggravated homosexuality' was redundant in that the sentence proposed was the same, and that the elements of the offence were undefined; it proposed remedying both. [49] It further found [50] that the bill should be amended to define 'victims' for the purposes of section 5, and proposed the deletion of the provision excluding punishment of 'victim[s] of homosexuality' for their 'involvement in homosexuality'. [26]

The majority further recommended the prohibition of 'activities by civil society organisations that are intended to normalise acts and conduct that normalises conduct that is banned or unlawful in Uganda', as an amendment to the existing text. [51] It proposed that 'grooming of persons to engage in homosexuality' should be prohibited, and that such provision should 'cater for all the methods through which homosexuality…[is] promoted, including in academic institutions'. [51]

The majority recommended 'different penalties for children offenders', [52] the deletion of offences 'based on…appearance' without reference to conduct, [53] and further definition of 'gender' and sex'. [53]

The minority recommended the drafting of a 'comprehensive non-discriminatory sexual offences Bill[sic]'. [54]

The majority proposed a number of textual amendments.

Final passage

Parliament agreed to suspend certain rules to pass the bill without delay. [55] As a result, the last two readings were approved on 21 March by voice vote. The number of MPs present during the debate was 389, which was enough to constitute a quorum. Fox Odoi-Oywelowo and Paul Kwizera Bucyana, who presented the minority report, were the only two MPs to openly oppose the proposal. [1] [56] After the debate, Odoi said that he had been 'permitted…as a minority member to have [his] say, the majority have had their way and that's how democracy works', [55] while Speaker Anita Among praised the passage of the draft law and 'thank[ed] [her]self for taking a bold decision'. [55] The National Resistance Movement Chief Whip, Denis Obua, said that foreign states should not 'impose…foreign customs'. [55] Following discussions on the avoidance of duplication of provisions of the Penal Code, the Deputy Attorney General, Jackson Kafuuzi, said that the government was prepared to support the bill. [55]

Provisions of the bill as passed

The version of the bill which Parliament passed on 21 March contained the following provisions:

President's returning of the bill to parliament for reconsideration

On 20 April, Agence France-Presse reported that the law officers had advised the President, Yoweri Museveni, not to assent to the bill. [57] NTV Uganda further reported that the parliamentary caucus of the ruling National Resistance Movement had called upon the President to return the bill to parliament for redrafting, [58] which Museveni did on the same day. [2] More specifically, Museveni asked Parliament to clarify that homosexual 'proclivities' do not constitute an offence if not acted upon and to remove the obligation to report acts of homosexuality. [59]

Revision by parliament

On 2 May, Parliament passed the bill again [60] by a vote of 348 to 1, with Fox Odoi-Oywelowo being the only MP to vote against. Paul Kwizera, who had previously voiced his opposition to the bill, voted in favour this time, after being pressured by some of his constituents to do so. [61] [62] The death penalty for aggravated homosexuality was retained, but under the new draft mere identification as LGBT is not criminalised and the obligation to report a homosexual act applies only if said act involved a vulnerable person, with the maximum penalty for not reporting increased from six months to five years. [60]

Enactment

On 29 May, it was announced that President Museveni had signed the bill into law. [4]

Prosecution under the law

In August 2023, a 20-year-old man became the first person prosecuted for "aggravated homosexuality" under the law, for which he faces the death penalty. [63] The man's lawyer, Justine Balya, confirmed that he will remain in custody until his case is heard by the High Court, given it was a capital offense. Several others have been arrested since the law's passage for allegedly engaging in same-sex activity. [64]

Summary

Provision(s)Scope
Section 1 and Schedule 1
  • Provide for definitions.
Section 2
  • Creates the offence of homosexuality, punishable by up to life imprisonment.
  • Creates the offence of attempted homosexuality, punishable by imprisonment for up to 10 years.
Section 3
  • Creates the offence of aggravated homosexuality, punishable by death. 'Aggravated homosexuals' are defined as people who
    • engage in homosexual intercourse with a person older than 75
    • engage in homosexual rape
    • engage in homosexual intercourse with children
    • engage in homosexual intercourse with a disabled or mentally ill person
    • leave another person disabled or mentally ill as a result of homosexual intercourse they had with that person, or
    • have been convicted of homosexuality more than once.
  • Creates the offence of attempted aggravated homosexuality, punishable by imprisonment for up to 14 years.
Section 4
  • Establishes that the maximum penalty for children convicted of homosexuality or attempted homosexuality is imprisonment for up to 3 years.
Section 5
  • Provides for the 'protection, assistance and payment of compensation to victims of homosexuality'.
Section 6
  • Reiterates that consent to an homosexual act does not constitute a defence.
Section 7
  • Prohibits making the identity of a victim of homosexual rape public without the consent of the victim or of a court of law, with a penalty of imprisonment for up to 3 years.
Section 8
  • Makes sharing homosexual pornographic material with a child an offence punishable by imprisonment for up to 20 years.
  • Makes recruitment or transportation of a child to facilitate homosexual sex and offence punishable by up to imprisonment for life.
Section 9
  • Makes it illegal to knowingly rent premises to people who wish to engage in homosexual acts on such premises, under the penalty of imprisonment for up to 7 years.
Section 10
  • Makes purporting to contract a same-sex marriage or attending a purpoted same-sex marriage an offence punishable by imprisonment for up to 10 years.
Section 11
  • Makes promotion of homosexuality an offence punishable by imprisonment for up to 20 years.
  • Allows Courts to order the suspension or cancellation of the licenses of organizations which promote homosexuality.
Section 12
  • Prevents people with a conviction of homosexuality from working in childcare institutions.
Section 13
  • Makes failure to disclose a previous conviction of homosexuality when applying to work in a childcare institution an offence punishable by imprisonment for up to 2 years.
Section 14
  • Mandates that any person who knows or reasonably suspects someone of committing and offense shall report the matter to the police. Makes it an offence, punishable by imprisonment for up to 5 years, for a person not to report a homosexual act they know or reasonably suspect to have taken place, if said act involved a 'vulnerable person'; the latter term is defined as 'a person who is in need of special protection because of age, sex, illness, physical or mental disability, social or personal status or other status, including a refugee, an internally-displaced person, a stateless person and an asylum seeker, a victim of sex-based violence, an illustrate person or elderly person'. Section 14 does not apply to lawyers acting in their official capacity.
Section 15
  • Prohibits making a false allegation of homosexuality, under the penalty of imprisonment for up to 1 year.
Section 16
Section 17
  • Grants the Minister for Ethics and Integrity the power to make secondary legislation to better carry out the Act.

Source

Judicial proceedings

Following the act's enactment, the Constitutional Court received four petitions and nineteen applications against the act, which Justice Geoffrey Kiryabwire ordered to be consolidated at the attorney general's suggestion on 28 October. [65] On 11 December, the applicants finalised their submissions. [66] In April 2024, the Constitutional Court issued a ruling which upheld most of the substantive aspects of the law, with the exceptions of provisions criminalizing the rental of premises for “homosexual purposes” and the failure to report certain homosexual activities to the police.

Reactions

  Countries opposing the bill
  European Union countries without statements
  Countries supporting the bill
  No statement
  Uganda

Prior to enactment

When asked about the Ugandan bill on 25 January 2023, Pope Francis stated that homosexual behaviour, while sinful, should not be criminalised. [67]

Demonstrators against the Anti-Homosexuality Act at Cape Town Pride, South Africa, in March 2014 20140301-IMG 2310 (12885819933).jpg
Demonstrators against the Anti-Homosexuality Act at Cape Town Pride, South Africa, in March 2014

In March 2023, Frank Mugisha, head of Sexual Minorities Uganda, said that the bill could lead to homelessness and loss of access to healthcare. [68] Chapter Four Uganda said that the bill did 'not meet constitutional and international human rights standards'; it said that it 'condemn[ed] all forms of sexual violence against children and adults, no matter the sexual orientation or gender identity of the perpetrator', and called on Parliament to take a 'human rights compliant approach'. [69]

The Regional Director for East and Southern Africa of Amnesty International said that the President should veto the bill, which amounted to 'a grave assault on LGBTI people' and was 'contemptuous of the Ugandan constitution'; he further called it 'ambiguous' and 'vaguely worded'. [70] Volker Türk, High Commissioner for Human Rights of the United Nations, made similar calls. According to Türk, the bill was 'discriminatory' and 'probably among the worst of its kind in the world','confuse[d] consensual and non-consensual relations', the former of which 'should never be criminalized', and the latter of which should be prohibited without reference to gender or sexual orientation, and conflicted with Uganda's constitution and international obligations. [71]

The United States, United Kingdom, Canada, Germany, and the European Union denounced the bill. [41] [72] [73] John Kirby, spokesman for the US national security council, said that the US government would consider economic and financial repercussions. [74]

In April 2023, the Economic Freedom Fighters, South Africa's third largest political party, condemned the bill and held a protest outside of the Ugandan High Commission in South Africa calling on other African countries to unite against the bill's enactment. [75] [76] South Africa's second-largest party, the Democratic Alliance, also condemned the bill and called on the South African government to show solidarity with Uganda's gay community. [77]

On 19 April 2023, the European Parliament passed by a vote of 416 to 62, with 38 abstentions, a resolution concerning LGBT rights which included a formal condemnation of the Ugandan Anti-Homosexuality Bill, 2023. Most of the votes against were cast by right-wing MEPs from Hungary, Italy, and Poland, and came as a result of the text of the resolution accusing the aforementioned countries of being anti-LGBT. The provisions condemning Uganda, meanwhile, were nearly universally supported by MEPs from all parties and from all member States. [78] [79]

In April 2023, The Lancet reported that even though the bill had not yet come into force, it had already had an effect on people's access to health services, with some health workers refusing to serve homosexual people out of fear they would be prosecuted once the new proposed penalties had come into force. [80]

On 19 May, the Italian Senate passed by unanimous consent a motion condemning the Ugandan bill. [81]

Following enactment

On 29 May, United States President Joe Biden condemned the law, calling it "a tragic violation of universal human rights" and "the latest development in an alarming trend of human rights abuses and corruption in Uganda". This sentiment was echoed by United States Senator Ted Cruz, who tweeted: "Any law criminalizing homosexuality or imposing the death penalty for 'aggravated homosexuality' is grotesque and an abomination. All civilized nations should join together in condemning this human rights abuse". [82] British Minister for Development and Africa Andrew Mitchell strongly criticised the law, referring to it as "deeply discriminatory".

On 9 June, Justin Welby, the Archbishop of Canterbury, wrote to the Primate and Archbishop of Uganda, Stephen Kaziimba, to express his 'grief and dismay at the Church of Uganda's support for the Anti-Homosexuality Act.' [83] Welby wrote that despite disagreement in the Anglican Communion 'over matters of sexuality', Anglicans had a long-established position against the criminalisation of homosexuality. [83]

In August 2023, the World Bank announced it would halt lending to Uganda in response to the new law. [84] The financial institution noted that the act "fundamentally contradicts the World Bank Group's values." [85]

In October 2023, United States President Joe Biden announced that Uganda would be expelled from the group of sub-Saharan African countries that benefit from tax breaks provided under the United States African Growth and Opportunity Act (AGOA) because of the country's "gross violations of internationally recognized human rights" which violate AGOA eligibility criteria. [86]

See also

Notes

    1. 1 2 Okiror 2023a.
    2. 1 2 Okiror 2023b.
    3. ↑ "President Museveni signs Anti-Homosexuality Bill into law". NewVision. 29 May 2023. Retrieved 29 May 2023.
    4. 1 2 Obulutsa 2023.
    5. ↑ "Uproar after Uganda enacts anti-gay law – DW – 05/30/2023". dw.com. Retrieved 8 November 2023.
    6. ↑ Ambrosino, Brandon (4 August 2014). "Uganda's anti-gay legislation, explained". Vox.
    7. ↑ Malone, Barry (13 May 2011). Uganda's "kill the gays" bill shelved again Reuters. Retrieved 2 September 2011
    8. ↑ Thockmorton, Warren (23 July 2011). Pastor decries "misrepresentation" of "kill the gays" bill, Salon.com. Retrieved 2 September 2011.
    9. ↑ Pearson, Christopher (16 January 2011.) Don't blame preachers for anti-gay bill, The Australian. Retrieved 2 September 2011.
    10. ↑ "Uganda's President signs anti-gay bill into law". CNN News . 24 February 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
    11. ↑ "Museveni signs Uganda anti-gay bill". NEWS24 . 24 February 2014. Retrieved 24 February 2014.
    12. ↑ "Uganda anti-gay law challenged in court". The Guardian. AFP. 31 July 2014. Retrieved 1 August 2014.
    13. ↑ "Uganda court annuls anti-gay law". BBC News. 1 August 2014. Retrieved 1 August 2014.
    14. ↑ "Uganda constitutional court annuls new anti-gay law". Times LIVE. AFP. 1 August 2014. Retrieved 1 August 2014.
    15. ↑ "Museveni rejects sexual offences and succession Bills". Africa-Press Uganda. 18 August 2021. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
    16. ↑ Mefo Takambou, Mimi (5 May 2021). "Uncertain future for LGBT+ rights in Uganda as controversial bill is passed". Deutsche Welle.
    17. ↑ "Museveni rejects sexual offences and succession Bills". Africa-Press Uganda. 18 August 2021. Retrieved 21 May 2021.
    18. ↑ Parliament of Uganda 2023.
    19. ↑ Basalirwa 2023.
    20. 1 2 Basalirwa 2023, s 2(1).
    21. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s2(2).
    22. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 2(2).
    23. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 2(3).
    24. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 4(1).
    25. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 4(2).
    26. 1 2 Basalirwa 2023, s 5.
    27. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 6.
    28. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 7(2).
    29. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, Schedule.
    30. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 7(3).
    31. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, ss 8, 9 and 11.
    32. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 10.
    33. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 12.
    34. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 13(a)[sic].
    35. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 13(b)[sic].
    36. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 13.
    37. ↑ Basalirwa 2023, s 15.
    38. 1 2 Atuhaire 2023.
    39. 1 2 3 4 5 Kahungu 2023.
    40. ↑ Noack 2023.
    41. ↑ AFP 2023.
    42. ↑ NTV 2023.
    43. ↑ Biryabarema 2023.
    44. 1 2 Ross 2023.
    45. ↑ Parliament of Uganda, HANSARDS 2023 MAY 2023.
    46. ↑ Muhereza & Hafasha 2023.
    47. ↑ "Uganda's anti-LGBT laws: Man faces death penalty for 'aggravated homosexuality'". BBC News. 29 August 2023. Retrieved 29 August 2023.
    48. ↑ "Uganda's anti-LGBT laws: Man faces death penalty for 'aggravated homosexuality'". BBC. 29 August 2023. Retrieved 4 April 2024.
    49. ↑ Daily Monitor & 2023.
    50. ↑ Okiror 2023c.
    51. ↑ "Pope Francis calls for end to anti-gay laws". The Guardian . 25 January 2023.
    52. ↑ Muhumuza 2023.
    53. ↑ Chapter Four 2023.
    54. ↑ Amnesty International 2023.
    55. ↑ OHCHR 2023.
    56. ↑ Staff 2023.
    57. ↑ Robertson 2023.
    58. ↑ Assheton 2023.
    59. ↑ Ramushwana 2023.
    60. ↑ Mahlati 2023.
    61. ↑ Goba 2023.
    62. ↑ European Parliament 2023.
    63. ↑ Il Fatto Quotidiano 2023.
    64. ↑ Jerving 2023.
    65. ↑ LaPresse 2023.
    66. ↑ Frazier 2023.
    67. 1 2 Welby 2023.
    68. ↑ "World Bank says no new funding to Uganda over anti-gay law". AP News. 9 August 2023. Retrieved 10 August 2023.
    69. ↑ Shalal, Andrea; Singh, Kanishka; Singh, Kanishka (9 August 2023). "World Bank halts new lending to Uganda over anti-LGBTQ law". Reuters. Retrieved 10 August 2023.
    70. ↑ "US to remove four African countries from trade deal". BBC News. 31 October 2023. Retrieved 7 November 2023.

    Related Research Articles

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Human rights in Uganda</span> Explaining Quality of Human Rights in The Country of Uganda

    Human rights in Uganda have trended for the past decades towards increasing harassment of the opposition, cracking down on NGOs which work on election and term limits, corruption, land rights, environmental issues, womens, children and gay rights. In 2012, the Relief Web sponsored Humanitarian Profile – 2012 said Uganda made considerable developments Since at least 2013 the Freedom in the World report by Freedom House has identified Uganda as a country considered to be "Not Free".There are several areas of concern when it comes to human rights in Uganda, and the "Not Free" classification is due to both low political rights and civil liberties rankings.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in New Zealand</span>

    New Zealand lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights are some of the most extensive in the world. The protection of LGBT rights is advanced, relative to other countries in Oceania, and among the most liberal in the world, with the country being the first in the region to legalise same-sex marriage.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Homosexual Law Reform Act 1986</span> 1986 New Zealand law decriminalising consensual gay sex

    The Homosexual Law Reform Act 1986 is a New Zealand Act of Parliament that broadly legalised consensual sex between men as well as anal sex regardless of partners' gender. It removed the provisions of the Crimes Act 1961 that criminalised this behaviour. The legislation established a uniform age of consent, setting it at 16 for both same-sex and opposite-sex partners.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual Offences Act 1967</span> United Kingdom legislation

    The Sexual Offences Act 1967 is an act of Parliament in the United Kingdom. It legalised homosexual acts in England and Wales, on the condition that they were consensual, in private and between two men who had attained the age of 21. The law was extended to Scotland by the Criminal Justice (Scotland) Act 1980 and to Northern Ireland by the Homosexual Offences Order 1982.

    The ages of consent vary by jurisdiction across Europe. The ages of consent – hereby meaning the age from which one is deemed able to consent to having sex with anyone else of consenting age or above – are between 14 and 18. The vast majority of countries set their ages in the range of 14 to 16; only four countries, Cyprus (17), Ireland (17), Turkey (18), and the Vatican City (18), set an age of consent higher than 16.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Tanzania</span>

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Tanzania face severe challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Homosexuality in Tanzania is a socially taboo topic, and same-sex sexual acts are criminal offences, punishable with life imprisonment. The law also criminalises heterosexuals who engage in oral sex and anal intercourse.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Dominica</span>

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Dominica face legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Homosexuality has been legal since 2024, when the High Court struck down the country's colonial-era sodomy law. Dominica provides no recognition to same-sex unions, whether in the form of marriage or civil unions, and no law prohibits discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation or gender identity.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Uganda</span>

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Uganda face severe challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Both male and female forms of same-sex sexual activity are illegal in Uganda. Originally criminalised by British colonial laws introduced when Uganda became a British protectorate, these have been retained since the country gained its independence.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Africa</span>

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) rights in Africa are in most countries very poor in comparison to the Americas, Western Europe and Oceania.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in Zambia</span>

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in Zambia face challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents. Same-sex sexual activity is illegal for both men and women in Zambia. Formerly a colony of the British Empire, Zambia inherited the laws and legal system of its colonial occupiers upon independence in 1964. Laws concerning homosexuality have largely remained unchanged since then, and homosexuality is covered by sodomy laws that also proscribe bestiality. Social attitudes toward LGBT people are mostly negative and coloured by perceptions that homosexuality is immoral and a form of insanity. However, in recent years, younger generations are beginning to show positive and open minded attitudes towards their LGBT peers.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Sodomy law</span> Laws criminalising certain sexual acts

    A sodomy law is a law that defines certain sexual acts as crimes. The precise sexual acts meant by the term sodomy are rarely spelled out in the law, but are typically understood and defined by many courts and jurisdictions to include any or all forms of sexual acts that are deemed to be "illegal", "illicit", "unlawful", "unnatural" and/or "immoral". Sodomy typically includes anal sex, oral sex, manual sex, and bestiality. In practice, sodomy laws have rarely been enforced to target against sexual activities between individuals of the opposite sex, and have mostly been used to target against sexual activities between individuals of the same sex.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Crimes Act 1961</span> Act of Parliament in New Zealand

    The Crimes Act 1961 is an act of New Zealand Parliament that forms a leading part of the criminal law in New Zealand. It repeals the Crimes Act 1908, itself a successor of the Criminal Code Act 1893. Most crimes in New Zealand are created by the Crimes Act, but some are created elsewhere. All common law offences are abolished by section 9, as are all offences against acts of the British Parliaments, but section 20 saves the old common law defences where they are not specifically altered.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">LGBT rights in the Cook Islands</span>

    Lesbian, gay, bisexual, and transgender (LGBT) people in the Cook Islands face some legal challenges not experienced by non-LGBT residents, but these challenges have gradually lessened in recent years. As of 1 June 2023, homosexual acts between men became legal in the Cook Islands after a vote by the Parliament of the Cook Islands. Female homosexual acts have never been illegal. Same-sex marriage is outlawed. Nevertheless, LGBT people do enjoy some limited legal protections, as employment discrimination on the basis of sexual orientation has been banned since 2013.

    David Bahati is a Ugandan accountant and politician. He is the Minister of State for Trade, Industry and Cooperatives (Industry) in the Cabinet of Uganda. He was appointed to that position in a cabinet reshuffle on 9 June 2021. He was previously the Minister of State for Finance, Planning and Economic Development (Planning) replacing Matia Kasaija. He is a member of the National Resistance Movement (NRM), the ruling party and is the Chairperson NRM Kabale District. He is a Member of Parliament for Ndorwa County West Constituency, Kabale District, in the Parliament of Uganda. He is chief of the Scout Board of Uganda. He is the Chairperson of the Uganda National Prayer Breakfast Fellowship.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2014</span> Ugandan law

    The Anti-Homosexuality Act, 2014 was an act passed by the Parliament of Uganda on 20 December 2013, which prohibited sexual relations between persons of the same sex. The act was previously called the "Kill the Gays bill" in the western mainstream media due to death penalty clauses proposed in the original version, but the penalty was later amended to life imprisonment. The bill was signed into law by the President of Uganda Yoweri Museveni on 24 February 2014. On 1 August 2014, however, the Constitutional Court of Uganda ruled the act invalid on procedural grounds.

    John "Longjones" Abdallah Wambere is a Ugandan gay rights activist and co-founder of Spectrum Uganda Initiatives, a Kampala-based LGBTI rights advocacy organization with a focus on health education. Because of the threat of violence and persecution he faces in Uganda, Wambere was approved for asylum in the United States by the U.S. Citizen and Immigration Services on September 11, 2014. He currently resides in Cambridge, Massachusetts.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Capital punishment for homosexuality</span> Death penalty for same-sex sexual activity

    Capital punishment as a criminal punishment for homosexuality has been implemented by a number of countries in their history. It currently remains a legal punishment in several countries and regions, most of which have sharia–based criminal laws, except for Uganda.

    <span class="mw-page-title-main">Sexual Offences Bill, 2019</span>

    The Sexual Offences Bill, 2019 was a bill in Uganda that consolidated a number of previous laws regarding sexual offences, introduced some provisions toward addressing sexual violence, and criminalised same-sex relationships. The bill was passed by the Parliament of Uganda on 5 May 2021, but was vetoed by President Yoweri Museveni on 18 August 2021.

    Asuman Basalirwa is a Ugandan politician and member of the 11th parliament representing Bugiri Municipality. He was first elected to the parliament in 2018 on the ticket of Justice Forum (JEEMA).

    This is a list of notable events in the history of LGBT rights taking place in the year 2023.

    References

    Further reading

    This page is based on this Wikipedia article
    Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
    Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.