Bristol Type 172

Last updated
Type 172
Bristol type 172.webp
Projection drawing [1] [2]
RoleLong-range Bomber
National originUnited Kingdom
Manufacturer Bristol Aeroplane Company
Number built0

The Bristol Type 172 was a proposed British long range four-engined bomber project developed by the Bristol Aeroplane Company. It is closely related to the Type 174 and Type 176 proposals.

Contents

In response to official interest in the development of increasingly capable strategic bomber in the aftermath of the Second World War, Bristol commenced work during late 1946 on its own new bomber design, which made use of relatively new aviation trends, such as turbojet propulsion and a sweptback wing. The Type 172 quickly garnered the Air Staff's interest and, on 23 July 1947, the Air Ministry issued Specification E.8/47 to Bristol. The firm began work on the comprehensive evaluation of the Type 172 aerodynamic properties and other key performance attributes.

To support the project's experimental stage, a half-scale flight-capable model, the Type 174, was devised. This was geometrically similar to the full-scale Type 172, but powered by a single Rolls-Royce Nene turbojet engine instead of four units. As the programme developed, it was recognised that the unsuitably high subsonic flow around the wing-body junction would necessitate the redesign of the wing, thus work on the Type 174 was stopped on November 1947 and a revision of the E.8/47 specification was issued on 8 June 1948, which stipulated numerous new design requirements and changes. In response, Bristol designed the Type 176.

Work on the Type 176 proceeded further that the prior efforts, reaching the mockup stage in late 1948. However, company management felt that other undertakings by the company, such as the Bristol Britannia turboprop-powered airliner, ought to be prioritised and, due to limited design resources, activity on the Type 176 was abandoned. No aircraft, full-scale or otherwise, were ever completed. Knowledge from the project was harnessed in several of the company's other proposals, including the Type 182, which was also known the Short Range Expendable Bomber. [3]

Design and development

Shortly after the end of the Second World War, Britain was highly interested in developing the capabilities of the Royal Air Force's strategic bomber fleet. This interest was present within the Air Ministry, which sought a high-speed long-range bomber powered by four turbojet engines. [4] During October 1946, the Bristol Aeroplane Company decided to tendered its own design, designated Type 172. In terms of its basic configuration, it was a high wing monoplane furnished with a 45 degree sweepback. [4] Bristol's submission was warmly received by the Air Staff, leading to the formulation of plans for a experimental programme to comprehensively evaluate the design's stability, control, and manoeuvrability. On 23 July 1947, the Air Ministry issued Specification E.8/47 ("Prototype Flying Models to Operational Requirement 250") to Bristol. [4] [5]

Amongst other aspects, this programme called for the construction of a half-scale flying model, which was designated Type 174. [5] [4] Geometrically similar to the Type 172, the Type 174 was to be powered by a single Rolls-Royce Nene turbojet engine and capable of seating a single pilot within its pressurised cockpit. The engine was installed in a central position, air was fed to it through bifurcated inlets which, along with the profiling of the tail pipes, intentionally reproduced the anticipated external air flow of the full-scale aircraft. [4] Additionally, provisions were made in the design for the incorporation of boundary layer control via suction; this was to be tested during the later portion of the flight test programme. The Type 174 was intended to achieve the same speed and altitude as had been projected for the Type 172, amongst other performance requirements. [4]

Aerodynamic investigation determined that the design's original shape would not work, specifically due to the high subsonic flow around the wing-body junction was unsuitable, thus the leading edge of the wing would need to be swept. [4] Accordingly, during November 1947, work on the Type 174 was stopped and the E.8/47 specification was revised. The updated specification, formally issued on 8 June 1948, called for a smaller 3/10th scale monoplane that would be powered by the newer Rolls-Royce Avon engine instead; other changes included the use of a swept shoulder-mounted wing, a swept but otherwise conventional tail unit, a single air intake in the nose, and the use of tandem landing gear. [4] [5]

In response to the changing requirements of the Air Ministry, Bristol had already begun to produce their latest design revision, designated Type 176, as early as February 1948. [4] According to the aviation historian C.H. Barnes, progress on the Type 176 proceeded further it had with either the Type 172 or Type 174; however, by the time the mock-up conference was held in October 1948, the company's management was increasingly aware that its design resources had been spread relatively thin across multiple undertakings. At that time, projects such as the Bristol Britannia, an airliner incorporating ground-breaking turboprop propulsion and capable of the then-uncommon feat of regular transatlantic flights, was judged to take precedence. [6]

Accordingly, work on the lower priority Type 176 was shelved in favour of Bristol's other endeavours. [3] Despite this decision, Bristol retained a handful of personnel working in this area, who continued to generate design brochures and tenders to various specifications. Their continued efforts in this area led to the Type 182, also referred to as the Short Range Expendable Bomber, which was intended to be operationally alike to the V-1 flying bomb deployed by Nazi Germany during the Second World War. [3]

Variants

Bristol Type 172
Proposal for a four-engined long-range bomber, not built. [7]
Bristol Type 174
Half-scale variant of the Type 172 for design evaluation powered by a Nene engine, not built. [7]
Bristol Type 176
Revised 3/10th Scale development aircraft for the Type 172 powered by a Avon engine, mock-up only, not built. [7]

Specification (Type 172 as proposed)

Data fromBristol Aircraft since 1919 [8]

General characteristics

Performance

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Short Stirling</span> British four-engined heavy bomber of the Second World War

The Short Stirling was a British four-engined heavy bomber of the Second World War. It has the distinction of being the first four-engined bomber to be introduced into service with the Royal Air Force (RAF).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bristol 188</span> British supersonic research aircraft

The Bristol 188 is a British supersonic research aircraft built by the Bristol Aeroplane Company in the 1950s. Its length, slender cross-section and intended purpose led to its being nicknamed the "Flaming Pencil".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rolls-Royce Olympus</span> Supersonic turbojet engine with afterburner

The Rolls-Royce Olympus was the world's second two-spool axial-flow turbojet aircraft engine design, first run in May 1950 and preceded only by the Pratt & Whitney J57, first-run in January 1950. It is best known as the powerplant of the Avro Vulcan and later models in the Concorde SST.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supermarine Attacker</span> Carrier-based fighter aircraft; first jet fighter in Royal Navy service

The Supermarine Attacker is a British single-seat naval jet fighter designed and produced by aircraft manufacturer Supermarine for the Royal Navy's Fleet Air Arm (FAA). It was the first jet fighter to enter operational service with the FAA.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Supermarine Swift</span> British single-seat jet-propelled fighter aircraft

The Supermarine Swift is a British single-seat jet fighter aircraft that was operated by the Royal Air Force (RAF). It was developed and manufactured by Supermarine during the 1940s and 1950s. The Swift featured many of the new jet age innovations, such as a swept wing. On 26 September 1953, a Swift F.4 piloted by Commander Mike Lithgow broke the world absolute speed record, reaching a speed of 737.7 mph (1,187 km/h).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lavochkin La-15</span> Type of aircraft

The Lavochkin La-15, was an early Soviet jet fighter and a contemporary of the Mikoyan-Gurevich MiG-15.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Blackburn B-20</span> Type of aircraft

The Blackburn B-20 was an experimental aircraft, first flying in 1940, that attempted to drastically increase the performance of flying boat designs. Blackburn Aircraft undertook an independent design study based on a patent filed by their chief designer, John Douglas Rennie for a retractable pontoon float that formed the planing hull.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro Ashton</span> 1950s British airliner prototype

The Avro 706 Ashton was a British prototype jet airliner made by Avro during the 1950s. Although it flew nearly a year after the de Havilland Comet, it represented an experimental programme and was never intended for commercial use.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Short Sperrin</span> Type of aircraft

The Short SA.4 Sperrin was a British jet bomber design of the early 1950s, built by Short Brothers and Harland of Belfast. It first flew in 1951. From the onset, the design had been viewed as a fall-back option in case the more advanced strategic bomber aircraft, then in development to equip the Royal Air Force's nuclear-armed V bomber force, experienced delays; the Sperrin was not put into production because these swept-wing designs, such as the Vickers Valiant, were by then available.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Avro 730</span> Type of aircraft

The Avro 730 was a planned Mach 3 reconnaissance aircraft and strategic bomber that was being developed by Avro Aircraft for the Royal Air Force (RAF). It had been originally envisioned as a very high-speed aircraft to perform aerial reconnaissance missions, conforming with the requirements of Air Ministry Specification OR.330. Avro subsequently decided to modify the design of the proposed 730 in order to accommodate its arming with nuclear weapons; this change therefore meant that the type would be able to perform the nuclear weapons delivery mission as well, which had been called for under Air Ministry Specification RB.156T which sought a high speed reconnaissance-bomber aircraft.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Operational Requirement F.155</span> British military defense specification

Operational Requirement F.155 was a specification issued by the British Ministry of Supply on 15 January 1955 for an interceptor aircraft to defend the United Kingdom from Soviet high-flying nuclear-armed supersonic bombers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Short Sturgeon</span> Post war British target tug

The Short Sturgeon was a planned British carrier-borne reconnaissance bomber whose development began during Second World War with the S.6/43 requirement for a high-performance torpedo bomber, which was later refined into the S.11/43 requirement which was won by the Sturgeon. With the end of the war in the Pacific production of the aircraft carriers from which the Sturgeon was intended to operate was suspended and the original reconnaissance bomber specification was cancelled.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gloster E.1/44</span> British prototype jet fighter design

The Gloster E.1/44 was a British single-engined jet fighter design of the Second World War, developed and produced by the British aviation firm Gloster Aircraft Company. It was amongst the first jet-propelled aircraft to be developed and was produced on an experimental basis.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Westland-Hill Pterodactyl</span>

Pterodactyl was the name given to a series of experimental tailless aircraft designs developed by G. T. R. Hill in the 1920s and early 1930s. Named after the genus Pterodactylus, a well-known type of Pterosaur commonly known as the pterodactyl, all but the first were produced by Westland Aircraft Ltd after Hill joined them.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tupolev Tu-12</span> Experimental Soviet medium bomber

The Tupolev Tu-12 was an experimental Soviet jet-powered medium bomber developed from the successful piston-engined Tupolev Tu-2 bomber after the end of World War II. It was designed as an interim aircraft to familiarize Tupolev and the Soviet Air Forces (VVS) with the issues involved with jet-engined bombers.

The Lavochkin La-168 was a jet fighter developed for the USSR. Like the better known Mikoyan MiG-15 which was ultimately selected and went on to become one of the most successful jet fighters of its era, the Lavochkin La-168 was designed in response to a 1946 request for an advanced swept-wing jet fighter capable of transonic performance. It was to use new turbojet based on the Rolls-Royce Nene in competition with the design bureaus of Artem Mikoyan and Mikhail Gurevich, and Aleksandr Yakovlev. A scaled down version of this aircraft would lead to the production of the La-15, which performed well but would be dropped in favor of the MiG-15.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sud-Est Grognard</span> 1950 French ground-attack aircraft

The SNCASE Grognard was designed as a single-seat, low-level ground-attack aircraft. Although in development in the 1950s for the French Armée de l'Air, the program was cancelled in favor of the Sud-Ouest Vautour II.

The SNCASO SO.4000 was an experimental French twin-engine bomber of the 1950s. It was the first French jet bomber developed, but it never entered operational service.

The Bristol Type 159 was a British design for a four-engined heavy bomber by the Bristol Aeroplane Company, of Filton, Bristol. A mockup was built but the project was cancelled and no aircraft were built.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Tupolev '73'</span> Type of aircraft

The Tupolev '73',, was a Soviet trijet medium bomber of the late 1940s. It lost out to the Ilyushin Il-28 'Beagle'.

References

Citations

  1. Buttler 2003, pp. 16–17.
  2. Porter, Andrew (2013). Transatlantic Betrayal. Amberley Publishing. ISBN   9-781-44-562429-7.[ page needed ]
  3. 1 2 3 Barnes 1988, p. 377.
  4. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Barnes 1988, p. 376.
  5. 1 2 3 Meekcoms and Morgan 1994, pp. 368-369.
  6. Barnes 1988, pp. 376-377.
  7. 1 2 3 Barnes 1988, pp. 376 - 377.
  8. Barnes 1988, p. 380.

Bibliography