Chile–United States Free Trade Agreement

Last updated

Chilean exports to the US, 1995-2010 Stacked export chl usa show 1995.2010.1.svg
Chilean exports to the US, 1995-2010

The United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement is a free trade agreement (FTA) between the United States and Chile signed on June 6, 2003. [1] The pact [2] came into force on January 1, 2004. On that date, tariffs on 90% of U.S. exports to Chile and 95% of Chilean exports to the United States were eliminated. [3] The agreement also established that Chile and the U.S. will establish duty-free trade in all products within a maximum of 12 years (2016). [4] In 2009, bilateral trade between the United States and Chile reached US$15.4 billion, a 141% increase over bilateral trade levels before the U.S.-Chile FTA took effect. In particular, U.S. exports to Chile in 2009 showed a 248% increase over pre-FTA levels. [5]

Contents

History

The first steps toward a trade agreement between the two countries began in 1992 when U.S. President George H. W. Bush agreed with Chile's President Patricio Aylwin to "want to pursue free-trade negotiations as quickly as that is feasible." [6] At the 1994 Summit of the Americas U.S. President Bill Clinton, Canada's Prime Minister, Jean Chrétien, and Ernesto Zedillo, the President of Mexico, had agreed to admit Chile to the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). [7] In February 1997 Chile's President Eduardo Frei Ruiz-Tagle visited the U.S. Congress and declared his support for his country to join NAFTA. [8] However, NAFTA expansion could not be accomplished because the Clinton administration failed to obtain “fast-track” negotiation abilities from the U.S. Congress. [9] Meanwhile, Chile signed a pact with Canada in 1996 and with Mexico in 1998. [10]

On August 1, 2002, the U.S. Senate granted fast-track authority to President George W. Bush to negotiate a free trade agreement with Chile and other countries. [11] On December 11, 2002, the U.S. Trade Representative Robert Zoellick announced it had reached an FTA agreement with Chile. [12] On January 30, 2003, President Bush notified the U.S. Congress of his intention to sign the treaty within 90 days.

Negotiations were complicated by Chile's opposition to an imminent U.S. invasion of Iraq. U.S Trade Representative Robert Zoellick stated that both President Bush and the U.S. Congress were "disappointed" by Chile's lack of support in the Iraq war and said there was no set time-frame for a signing of the pact. On April 23, 2003 U.S Secretary of State Colin Powell said the FTA would be signed and approved but they were looking for the appropriate moment to submit it to Congress. On May 7, 2003, President Bush said the "important FTA with Chile would go ahead". [13]

The treaty was finally signed on June 6, 2003, at the Vizcaya Palace in Miami by Chile's Foreign Affairs Minister Soledad Alvear and Zoellick. It was ratified by the U.S. House of Representatives on July 24, 2003, by a vote of 270–156, and ratified by the U.S. Senate on July 31, 2003, by a vote of 65–32. [14] It was ratified by the Chamber of Deputies of Chile on October 7, 2003, by a vote of 87–8, [15] and ratified by the Senate of Chile on October 22, 2003, by a vote of 34–5. [13] The treaty was promulgated by President Bush on September 3, 2003, and by Chilean President Ricardo Lagos on December 4, 2003.

Provisions

The text of the Free Trade Agreement is divided into twenty-five sections, listed and summarized as follows:

Preambles

A summary of political goals of the agreement, including “CONTRIBUTE to hemispheric integration and the fulfillment of the objectives of the Free Trade Area of the Americas”

Initial Provisions

Relate objectives of the agreement.

General Definitions

This chapter lays the framework for the FTA and sets definitions to be used throughout the agreement in order to assure uniformity.

National Treatment and Market Access for Goods

Define tariffs and customs general regulation, safeguards, and equivalences of nomenclatures for several goods. Chile eliminate tariffs immediately on pork and pork products, beef offal, durum wheat, barley, barley malt, sorghum, soybeans and soybean meal, pasta, breakfast cereals, cereal preparations, and sunflower seeds. Access for beef on both sides will be liberalized over 4 years, beginning with a 1,000-metric-ton quota, a 10-percent annual growth factor, and a linear phase-out of the out-of-quota tariff rate. Access for poultry on both sides will be completely liberalized over 10 years Chile's duty on many dairy products, including skim milk powder, whey, and cheeses, will be eliminated in 4 years; duties on other dairy products will be eliminated in 8 years. Tariffs on U.S. and Chilean wines are being progressively harmonized down to the lowest wine tariff rate and will be eliminated by 2016.

Higher effective tariffs will remain for wheat, wheat flour, and sugar during the 12 year transition period under the FTA due to the application of an import price band system.

Rules of Origin and Origin Procedures

The FTA employs product-specific rules of origin similar to those contained in the NAFTA, defining the general rule to consider a good as affected for the agreement when “the good is wholly obtained or produced entirely in the territory of one or both of the Parties” distinguish it from “simple combining or packaging operations” that are not covered by this FTA.

Customs Administration

Regulate custom operation in terms of timing, penalties, information, and others. Established three years for adapt Chilean custom procedures.

Sanitary and Phyto-Sanitary Measures

Address bilateral sanitary and phytosanitary matters

Technical Barriers to Trade

Establish cooperation on regulatory issues, such as equivalence of technical regulations and standards.

Trade Remedies

Define standards and conditions for safeguard measures.

Government Procurement

Investment

Establish “national treatment” for investors of the other party, compromising a treatment no less favorable, in like circumstances, to its own investors. The same criterion is defined for services, including financial.

Cross-Border Trade in Services

Financial Services

Telecommunications

Compromise each party to ensure that enterprises of the other Party have access to and use of any public telecommunications service offered in its territory, on reasonable and non-discriminatory terms and conditions, including buy enterprises of this area.

Temporary Entry for Business Persons

Facilitate temporary entry for business persons, excluding citizenship, nationality, permanent residence, or employment on a permanent basis

Electronic Commerce

Eliminate any customs duties on digital product from parties.

Competition Policy, Designated Monopolies, and State Enterprises

Regulate procedures to designate monopolies that could affect the other party, including state enterprises.

Intellectual Property Rights

Strengths compromises from Chile in terms of copyright and control of piracy.

Labor

Reaffirm obligations as members of the International Labor Organization (ILO) and compromises domestic labor law enforcement

Environment

Establish an Environment Affairs Council with representatives of the Parties, which shall meet at least once a year, to discuss environmental issues related with the agreement.

Transparency

Regulate communication between parties.

Administration of the Agreement

Dispute Settlement

Exceptions

Final Provisions

Including annexes, measures and side letters. [16]

Views in favor of U.S.-Chile FTA

Proponents of the US-Chile FTA claim that the reduction in trade barriers brought on by the pact will lead to an increase in trade between the two countries.

Views opposed to the U.S.-Chile FTA

Environment and social issues

Opponents of the US-Chile FTA claim that it will worsen Chile's over-dependence on scarce natural resource exports, and contribute to worsening inequality in both countries.

Labor

In this topic critics point out the agreement's weakness of effectively realizing its commitments. For instance, the agreement doesn't consider sanctions for weakening or violating domestic labor laws. [17]

Quotas and regulatory issues

Opponents of the US-Chile FTA claim that it will worsen Chile's over-dependence on scarce natural resource exports, and contribute to worsening inequality in both countries. The former Chilean minister of foreign relations, Hernán Errázuriz questioned whether the accord should “even be called a free trade agreement” because it “contains quotas for many products, allows the United States to retain broad antidumping attributes and does not control the damage of billions of dollars in distorted agricultural subsidies.” [18]

Short-term capitals’ regulation

The U.S. House Representative Barney Frank, criticizes the agreement for their deregulation over short-term capital flows, a key factor for Chile's successful economy. [19]

See more

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">North American Free Trade Agreement</span> Agreement between Canada, Mexico, and the United States (1994–2020)

The North American Free Trade Agreement was an agreement signed by Canada, Mexico, and the United States that created a trilateral trade bloc in North America. The agreement came into force on January 1, 1994, and superseded the 1988 Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement between the United States and Canada. The NAFTA trade bloc formed one of the largest trade blocs in the world by gross domestic product.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Free Trade Area of the Americas</span> Failed 2005 trade agreement for North and South America

The Free Trade Area of the Americas was a proposed agreement to eliminate or reduce the trade barriers among all countries in the Americas, excluding Cuba. Negotiations to establish the FTAA ended in failure, however, with all parties unable to reach an agreement by the 2005 deadline they had set for themselves.

The Canada–United States Free Trade Agreement (CUSFTA), official name as the Free Trade Agreement between Canada and the United States of America, was a bilateral trade agreement reached by negotiators for Canada and the United States on October 4, 1987, and signed by the leaders of both countries on January 2, 1988. The agreement phased out a wide range of trade restrictions in stages, over a ten-year period, and resulted in a substantial increase in cross-border trade as an improvement to the last replaced trade deal. With the addition of Mexico in 1994, CUSFTA was superseded by the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Dominican Republic–Central America Free Trade Agreement</span> Free trade agreement

The Dominican Republic–Central America–United States Free Trade Agreement is a free trade agreement. Originally, the agreement encompassed the United States and the Central American countries of Costa Rica, El Salvador, Guatemala, Honduras, and Nicaragua, and was called CAFTA. In 2004, the Dominican Republic joined the negotiations, and the agreement was renamed CAFTA-DR.

The Australia – United States Free Trade Agreement (AUSFTA) is a preferential trade agreement between Australia and the United States modelled on the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA). The AUSFTA was signed on 18 May 2004 and came into effect on 1 January 2005.

The US-Morocco Free Trade Agreement is a bilateral trade agreement between the United States and Morocco. The agreement was signed on June 15, 2004, followed by U.S. President George W. Bush's signing of the USMFTA Implementation Act on August 17, 2004. The United States House of Representatives ratified the pact on July 22, 2004 by a 323–99 vote. The United States Senate passed the bill by unanimous consent on July 21, 2004. The Morocco FTA came into effect on January 1, 2006.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Trade Act of 1974</span> United States trade law

The Trade Act of 1974 was passed to give the President more power in matters of trade agreements and tariffs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peru–United States Trade Promotion Agreement</span>

The United States–Peru Trade Promotion Agreement is a bilateral free trade agreement, whose objectives are eliminating obstacles to trade, consolidating access to goods and services and fostering private investment in and between the United States and Peru. Besides commercial issues, it incorporates economic, institutional, intellectual property, labor and environmental policies, among others. The agreement was signed on April 12, 2006; ratified by the Peruvian Congress on June 28, 2006; by the U.S. House of Representatives on November 2, 2007, and by the U.S. Senate on December 4, 2007. The Agreement was implemented on February 1, 2009.

Section 301 of the U.S. Trade Act of 1974 authorizes the President to take all appropriate action, including tariff-based and non-tariff-based retaliation, to obtain the removal of any act, policy, or practice of a foreign government that violates an international trade agreement or is unjustified, unreasonable, or discriminatory, and that burdens or restricts U.S. commerce. Section 301 cases can be self-initiated by the United States Trade Representative (USTR) or as the result of a petition filed by a firm or industry group. If USTR initiates a Section 301 investigation, it must seek to negotiate a settlement with the foreign country in the form of compensation or elimination of the trade barrier. For cases involving trade agreements, the USTR is required to request formal dispute proceedings as provided by the trade agreements. The law does not require that the U.S. government wait until it receives authorization from the World Trade Organization (WTO) to take enforcement actions, and the President is increasingly focused on enforcing intellectual property (IP) rights under the "Special" 301 amendments but the U.S. has committed itself to pursuing the resolution of disputes under WTO agreements through the WTO dispute settlement mechanism, which has its own timetable.

The United States–Jordan Free Trade Agreement is the first free trade agreement (FTA) between the United States and an Arab country. It is Jordan's second free trade agreement, after the 1997 Greater Arab Free Trade Agreement. The agreement, which grants duty-free status to nearly all Jordanian exports to the United States, was signed on 24 October 2000 and went into force on 17 December 2001. Rules of origin require that goods be composed of a minimum of 35 percent Jordanian content to be eligible for duty-free entry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bahrain–United States Free Trade Agreement</span>

The United States–Bahrain Free Trade Agreement (USBFTA) is a free trade agreement (FTA) between the United States and Bahrain, signed on September 14, 2004. It was ratified by the United States House of Representatives on December 7, 2005, by 327–95, with 10 not voting.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Singapore–United States Free Trade Agreement</span> H1-B visa variant issued to citizens of Singapore and Chile, and 2003 American tariff law

The United States–Singapore Free Trade Agreement was signed 6 May 2003 and ratified by the US House of Representatives on 24 July 2003 by a vote of 272-155. The US Senate ratified the bill on 31 July 2003 by a vote of 66-32. President George W. Bush signed into law the United States-Singapore Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act on 3 September 2003. The trade pact was implemented by both countries on 1 January 2004.

The United States–Israel States Free Trade Agreement (FTA) is a trade pact between the State of Israel and the United States of America established in 1985 to lower trade barriers in some goods. The agreement reduces rates of duty, and in some case eliminates all duties, on merchandise exported from Israel to the United States. The agreement also covers merchandise exported from the Gaza Strip and the West Bank.

The United States-Colombia Trade Promotion Agreement (CTPA) is a bilateral free trade agreement between the United States and Colombia. Sometimes called the Colombia Free Trade Agreement, it was signed on November 22, 2006, by Deputy U.S. Trade Representative John Veroneau and Colombian Minister of Trade, Industry, and Tourism Jorge Humberto Botero. CTPA is a comprehensive agreement that will eliminate tariffs and other barriers to trade in goods and services between the United States and Colombia, including government procurement, investment, telecommunications, electronics commerce, intellectual property rights, and labor and environmental protection The United States Congress. Colombia's Congress approved the agreement and a protocol of amendment in 2007. Colombia's Constitutional Court completed its review in July 2008, and concluded that the Agreement conforms to Colombia's Constitution. President Obama tasked the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative with seeking a path to address outstanding issues surrounding the Colombia FTA. The United States Congress then took on the agreement and passed it on October 12, 2011. The agreement went into effect on May 15, 2012.

The fast track authority for brokering trade agreements is the authority of the President of the United States to negotiate international agreements in an expedited manner and with limited congressional oversight. Renamed the trade promotion authority (TPA) in 2002, the TPA is an impermanent power granted by Congress to the President. It remained in effect from 1975 to 1994, pursuant to the Trade Act of 1974 and from 2002 to 2007 pursuant to the Trade Act of 2002. Although it technically expired in July 2007, it remained in effect for agreements that were already under negotiation until their passage in 2011. In June 2015, a third renewal passed Congress and was signed into law by President Barack Obama.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement</span> 2012 to present trade deal

The United States–Korea Free Trade Agreement, also known as KORUS FTA, is a trade agreement between the United States and South Korea. Negotiations were announced on February 2, 2006, and concluded on April 1, 2007. The treaty was first signed on June 30, 2007, with a renegotiated version signed in early December 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act</span> Law voted in 2002 by the American Congress

The Andean Trade Promotion and Drug Eradication Act (ATPDEA) is a trade preference system by which the United States grants duty-free access to a wide range of exports from four Andean countries: Bolivia, Colombia, Ecuador and Peru. It was enacted on October 31, 2002 as a replacement for the similar Andean Trade Preference Act (ATPA). The purpose of this preference system is to foster economic development in the Andean countries to provide alternatives to coca production. Bolivia has installed capacity to industrialize coca production and its derivatives, since coca has no narcotic effects, but the United States does not make any difference between coca and cocaine. Thus, the U.S. government eliminated this "preference".

The negotiations for the Trans-Pacific Partnership Agreement were held between 12 countries between 2008 and 2015. The negotiations were aimed at obtaining an agreement between the Trans-Pacific Strategic Economic Partnership Agreement parties Brunei, Chile, Singapore and New Zealand, as well as the Australia and the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Robert Lighthizer</span> American attorney and government official (born 1947)

Robert Emmet Lighthizer is an American attorney and government official who was the United States Trade Representative in the Donald Trump administration from 2017 to 2021.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">United States–Mexico–Canada Agreement</span> Free trade agreement

The Agreement between the United States of America, Mexico, and Canada (USMCA) is a free trade agreement among the United States, Mexico, and Canada. It replaced the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) implemented in 1994, and is sometimes characterized as "NAFTA 2.0", or "New NAFTA", since it largely maintains or updates the provisions of its predecessor. USMCA is one of the world's largest free trade zones, with a population of more than 510 million people and an economy of $30.997 trillion in nominal GDP — nearly 30 percent of the global economy.

References

  1. ↑ "Chile and U.S. Sign Accord on Free Trade - New York Times". The New York Times . June 7, 2003. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  2. ↑ "Final Text | Office of the United States Trade Representative". Ustr.gov. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  3. ↑ "The U.S.-Chile Free Trade Agreement: An Early Record of Success | Office of the United States Trade Representative". Ustr.gov. January 1, 2004. Archived from the original on October 15, 2010. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  4. ↑ http://www.ustr.gov/sites/default/files/uploads/reports/2010/NTE/2010_NTE_Chile_final.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  5. ↑ "Archived copy" (PDF). Archived from the original (PDF) on June 5, 2010. Retrieved December 6, 2010.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: archived copy as title (link)
  6. ↑ "Trade Talks With Chile Are Planned - New York Times". The New York Times . May 14, 1992. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  7. ↑ "Chile Is Admitted as North American Free Trade Partner - New York Times". The New York Times . December 12, 1994. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  8. ↑ "Chile's Leader Asks Congress For Entry To Nafta Group - Chicago Tribune". Articles.chicagotribune.com. February 28, 1997. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  9. ↑ "'Fast Track' Is Derailed - New York Times". The New York Times . November 11, 1997. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  10. ↑ "ECONOMIC VIEW; Passing The Torch On a Chile Trade Deal - New York Times". The New York Times . January 7, 2001. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  11. ↑ "U.S. Senate: Legislation & Records Home > Votes > Roll Call Vote". Senate.gov. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  12. ↑ "U.S. and Chile Reach Free Trade Accord - New York Times". The New York Times . December 12, 2002. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  13. 1 2 "Entró en vigencia TLC con Estados Unidos". Cooperativa.cl. December 31, 2003. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  14. ↑ President George W. Bush signed into law the United States-Chile Free Trade Agreement Implementation Act on September 3, 2003.
  15. ↑ "Cámara de Diputados de Chile". Camara.cl. Retrieved September 9, 2010.
  16. ↑ http://wits.worldbank.org/GPTAD/PDF/archive/UnitedStates-Chile.pdf [ bare URL PDF ]
  17. ↑ www.law.uiuc.edu https://web.archive.org/web/20100615195628/http://www.law.uiuc.edu/publications/cll%26pj/archive/vol_25/issue_2/MartinArticle25-2.pdf. Archived from the original (PDF) on June 15, 2010.{{cite web}}: Missing or empty |title= (help)
  18. ↑ Becker, Elizabeth (December 12, 2002). "U.S. and Chile Reach Free Trade Accord - NYTimes.com". New York Times. Retrieved December 15, 2010.
  19. ↑ Congress, U. S. (May 2007). Congressional Record - Google Books. U.S. Government Printing Office. ISBN   9780160785528 . Retrieved December 15, 2010.