NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation

Last updated
NIST experiment to replicate an office fire in the World Trade Center. Tests such as this helped validate computer models of the spread rate and intensity of the fires initiated by jet fuel and fed by the office furnishings and other combustibles. Video thumbnail shows fire test of mockup WTC office environment with multiple workstations. Fire test; World Trade Center (5887635739).jpg
NIST experiment to replicate an office fire in the World Trade Center. Tests such as this helped validate computer models of the spread rate and intensity of the fires initiated by jet fuel and fed by the office furnishings and other combustibles. Video thumbnail shows fire test of mockup WTC office environment with multiple workstations.

The NIST World Trade Center Disaster Investigation was a report that the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) conducted to establish the likely technical causes of the three building failures that occurred at the World Trade Center following the September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks. [2] The report was mandated as part of the National Construction Safety Team Act (NCST Act), which was signed into law on October 1, 2002 by President George W. Bush. NIST issued its final report on the collapse of the World Trade Center's twin towers in September 2005, and the agency issued its final report on 7 World Trade Center in November 2008.

Contents

NIST concluded that the collapse of each tower resulted from the combined effects of airplane impact damage, widespread fireproofing dislodgment, and the fires that ensued. The sequence of failures that NIST concluded initiated the collapse of both towers involved the heat-induced sagging of floor trusses pulling some of the exterior columns on one side of each tower inward until they buckled, after which instability rapidly spread and the upper sections then fell onto the floors below. [3] 7 World Trade Center, which was never directly hit by an airplane, collapsed as a result of thermal expansion of steel beams and girders that were heated by uncontrolled fires caused by the collapse of the North Tower and failure of the fire-resistive material. [4]

Context

Collapse of the World Trade Center

During the September 11 attacks, two jet airliners struck the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center (WTC), one to each tower. [5] As a result, the two 110 stories-tall skyscrapers collapsed, causing complete destruction to the entire WTC complex and killing 2,763 people. The South Tower collapsed at 9:59 a.m. (EDT) after burning for approximately 56 minutes. 29 minutes later, the North Tower collapsed having burned for 102 minutes. [5] When the North Tower collapsed, debris fell on the nearby 7 World Trade Center, damaging it and starting fires that burned for almost seven hours, compromising the building's structural integrity. Seven World Trade Center collapsed at 5:21 p.m. (EDT). [4]

The collapse of the World Trade Center buildings on September 11, 2001 was unprecedented; never before had a steel-framed multi-story building suffered a complete collapse as a result of fire. [6] In the immediate aftermath, knowledgeable structural engineers began providing a range of explanations in an attempt to help the public understand these tragic events. [7] However, a coordinated effort would need to be organized to investigate and analyze the complex series of events that led to each collapse.

FEMA World Trade Center Building Performance Study

In the aftermath of the World Trade Center complex, researchers responded immediately by traveling to ground zero where they began collecting data. Among the first was the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) and American Society of Civil Engineers (ASCE), who together formed a Building Performance Study Team to understand how the building structures failed and why. The team produced the first official government report attempting to explain the destruction of the World Trade Center complex. [8]

They were able to make many observations and findings, including preliminary analysis of the damaged structures, analysis of the buildings' fire suppression systems, and recommendations to building codes and fire standards for including airplane impact into building design. [9] FEMA's final report, FEMA 403 issued in May 2002, titled World Trade Center Building Performance Study: Data Collection, Preliminary Observations, and Recommendations, also provided a substantial amount of data about the event not documented elsewhere. Their findings suggested that fires, in conjunction with damage to the structural members and fire suppression systems inflicted by the jet airliners, played a key role in the collapse of the buildings.

However, the team's investigation was hampered by a number of issues. The lack of authority of investigators to impound pieces of steel for examination before they were recycled led to the loss of important pieces of evidence that were destroyed early during the search and rescue effort, and much of the steel had already been recycled in the one month that had lapsed between the attack and the deployment of the team. The team was further impeded by ongoing criminal investigations by the FBI and NTSB. In a hearing to the U.S. House of Representatives' Committee on Science on March 6, 2002, a panel of witnesses and experts described the obstacles as: [8]

Because of these inadequacies, the Building Performance Study team could not "definitively determine the sequence of events leading to the collapse of each tower." [10] The report was remarkably blunt in pointing out shortcomings and missteps in the investigation and its recommendation for another, more thorough and authoritative investigation. [11]

National Construction Safety Team act

As a result of the inconclusive FEMA Building Performance Study team's findings and concerns over missteps in its investigation, the U.S. House of Representatives drafted legislation that would give wide powers, including the right to issue subpoenas, to teams investigating building failures. [12] The bill also mandates that the teams would be centered at the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) whose building and fire research laboratory in Maryland has conducted extensive investigations of building failures in the past. [13] The bill, cited as the National Construction Safety Team (NCST) act, passed the House and the Senate and was signed into law on Oct. 1, 2002 by President George W. Bush. [14]

The NCST act gives NIST a clear mandate to: [15]

  1. establish the likely technical cause of building failures;
  2. evaluate the technical aspects of procedures used for evacuation and emergency response;
  3. recommend specific changes to building codes, standards, and practices;
  4. recommend any research or other appropriate actions needed to improve the structural safety of buildings; and/or changes in emergency response and evacuation procedures; and,
  5. make final recommendations within 90 days of completing an investigation.

Investigation

NIST began its investigation on 21 August 2002. Prior to this date, volunteers from NIST, FEMA, ASCE and others collected steel members important to the investigation from the four steel recycling facilities during the recovery effort. They collected and cataloged 236 steel artifacts, including exterior columns, core columns, floor trusses and other similar structural members. [16] They were able to observe the metallurgical chemistry and structure and perform experiments on the recovered elements to measure their attributes such as mechanical properties under high temperatures.

NIST's Building and Fire Research Laboratory created a complex computer model to understand the collapse of the towers. [17] Specifically, they wanted to know if the collapse of a core column could cause the progressive collapse of the whole building. They also modeled the dispersion of the jet fuel and damage to the interior of the building that was not visible from photographic evidence and eyewitnesses. The model was used to understand the hypothesis of the collapse.

Findings

Twin Towers

NIST computer simulation of the AA11 aircraft impact in World Trade Center Twin Towers (WTC 1)

The investigation team integrated their metallurgy analysis, experimental results and computer simulation with video and photographs of the destruction and eyewitness accounts to form their understanding for how the buildings collapsed. They came to two conclusions: [16]

  1. A conventional fire should not have caused the collapse of the 110-story skyscrapers in the absence of structural and fire-proofing insulation damage.
  2. The towers would likely not have collapsed if not for the impact and damage that the aircraft caused to the fire-proofing insulation.

The most probable collapse sequence was similar between the South Tower and North Tower, but they were not identical. However, they both involved all major structural systems of the building design: the core columns, the exterior columns and the building floors. [18]

  1. First, the floors that lost fire-proofing insulation due to debris impact began to sag as a result of the high temperature of the fire.
  2. The sagging floors pulled inward on the walls
  3. The exterior walls began to bow inward under the combined forces of the sagging floors, the fire, and the severed core columns from aircraft impact damage.
  4. Finally, the exterior walls buckled/caved in and the buildings collapsed. The stories below provided little resistance to the relatively tremendous energy of the falling building, allowing them to fall very quickly.

The NIST investigation's conclusions do not support the "pancake theory" of collapse initiation, in which the collapse is begun by a progressive failure of the floor system. [19] However, "pancaking" was accepted as the mode of collapse progression. [20]

7 World Trade Center

NIST released the final report of their investigation into the collapse of the 47-story World Trade Center 7 building on 20 August 2008. [17]

Their conclusion is that WTC7 collapsed primarily as a result of the fire that was started when the WTC1 collapsed. The collapse of the North Tower also damaged the south exterior wall of WTC7 but it was not a contributing factor. Because FDNY could not attempt to extinguish the fires that were burning on six floors of the building, the fire-proofing insulation began to fail. After several hours of uncontrolled fire, the steel columns, girders and trusses absorbed heat and rapidly lost their strength. As they began to sag, deform and buckle, the interior structure below the east penthouse was brought down. The failed core columns' load was distributed to the remaining columns which all failed. This led to the progressive collapse of the building. [21]

Reforms

The National Construction Safety Team Act of 2002, which mandated NIST to perform its investigation, specifically states that NIST, which is not a regulatory agency, is not authorized to require the adoption of building codes, standards or practices. [2] However, NIST's final reports on the collapse of the WTC buildings provides the technical basis for new and improved standards, codes and practices on designing buildings to resist progressive collapse. Many NIST researchers are also key members of professional, standards-developing organizations, and NIST actively works with these organizations to ensure that lessons learned from investigations are put to use. [22]

Fire Protection of Structural Members

The National Fire Protection Association has adopted many of NIST's recommended improvements to the building code. NIST's recommendation for improving a building's structural frame and support system under severe loading conditions, such as during a fire event, resulted in the adoption of a new approach to high-rise building design. Much more scrutiny is to be given to the primary and secondary structural members as well as the connections that tie them together. [23]

The steel columns of the WTC buildings significantly lost strength when they were subjected to the heat of the fire. Concrete heated to the same temperature, however, loses no strength at all. [24] As a result, new high-rise buildings, including One World Trade Center, are being constructed with reinforced, high-strength concrete. [25]

Emergency Communication Systems

Due to the fact that New York City's Office of Emergency Management was located in World Trade Center 7 on the day of the attacks and vital communications equipment was located in the North Tower, their response was significantly impeded. They have since moved their offices to Brooklyn, and disaster and emergency management teams around the country are also moving away from possible targets of terrorist attacks, natural disasters and other emergency scenarios. [26]

Conspiracy theories

Critics of these conspiracy theories say they are a form of conspiracism common throughout history after a traumatic event in which conspiracy theories emerge as a mythic form of explanation. [27]

A related criticism addresses the form of research on which the theories are based. Thomas W. Eagar, an engineering professor at MIT, suggested they "use the 'reverse scientific method'. They determine what happened, throw out all the data that doesn't fit their conclusion, and then hail their findings as the only possible conclusion." [28]

List of reports released

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Communication during the September 11 attacks</span> Communication problems during the September 11 attacks

Communication problems and successes played an important role during the September 11 attacks in 2001 and their aftermath. Systems were variously destroyed or overwhelmed by loads greater than they were designed to carry, or failed to operate as intended or desired.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1 World Trade Center (1971–2001)</span> Former skyscraper in Manhattan, New York

The original One World Trade Center was one of the Twin Towers of the original World Trade Center complex in New York City. It was completed in 1972, stood at a height of 1,368 feet (417 m), and was the tallest building in the world until 1973, when surpassed by the Willis Tower in Chicago.

Leslie Earl Robertson was an American engineer. He was the lead structural engineer of the Twin Towers of the original World Trade Center in New York City, and served as structural engineer on numerous other projects, including the U.S. Steel Tower in Pittsburgh, Shanghai World Financial Center, and the Bank of China Tower in Hong Kong.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Collapse of the World Trade Center</span> Outcome of September 11 attacks

The World Trade Center in Lower Manhattan, New York City, was destroyed on September 11, 2001, as a result of al-Qaeda's terror attacks. Two commercial airliners hijacked by terrorists were deliberately flown into the Twin Towers of the complex, resulting in a total progressive collapse that killed almost 3,000 people. It was the deadliest and costliest building collapse in history.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Marriott World Trade Center</span> Hotel in Manhattan, New York (1981–2001)

The New York Marriott World Trade Center was a 22-story 825-room hotel within the original World Trade Center complex in Manhattan, New York City. Situated on the original Three World Trade Center, It opened in April 1981 as the Vista International Hotel and was the first major hotel to open in Lower Manhattan south of Canal Street since 1836. In November 1995, it was bought by Marriott Corporation and renamed the Marriott World Trade Center.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Trade Center controlled demolition conspiracy theories</span> 9/11 conspiracy theories

Some conspiracy theories contend that the collapse of the World Trade Center was caused not solely by the airliner crash damage that occurred as part of the September 11 attacks and the resulting fire damage but also by explosives installed in the buildings in advance. Controlled demolition theories make up a major component of 9/11 conspiracy theories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Construction of the World Trade Center</span> Construction project in New York City (1968–1987)

The construction of the first World Trade Center complex in New York City was conceived as an urban renewal project to help revitalize Lower Manhattan spearheaded by David Rockefeller. The project was developed by the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey. The idea for the World Trade Center arose after World War II as a way to supplement existing avenues of international commerce in the United States.

Dr. W. Gene Corley, P.E. was an American structural engineer and "preeminent expert on building collapse investigations and building codes." Corley was the Senior Vice President of CTLGroup from 1987 to 2013, where he led structural engineering projects, including numerous evaluations of buildings and structures damaged by earthquake, explosions, and from terrorist attacks. He led the investigation of structural performance of the Murrah Building following the Oklahoma City bombing in 1995, and the World Trade Center Building Performance Study in 2001–2002 following the September 11, 2001 attacks. He died on March 1, 2013. He was 77.

The National Construction Safety Team Act, signed into law October 1, 2002, authorizes the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) to establish investigative teams to assess building performance and emergency response and evacuation procedures in the wake of any building failure that has resulted in substantial loss of life or that posed significant potential of substantial loss of life.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Progressive collapse</span> Building collapse type

Progressive collapse is the process where a primary structural element fails, resulting in the failure of adjoining structural elements, which in turn causes further structural failure.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2 World Trade Center (1971–2001)</span> Former skyscraper in Manhattan, New York

The original Two World Trade Center was one of the Twin Towers in the original World Trade Center Complex in New York City. The Tower was completed and opened in 1973 at a height of 1,362 feet (415 m) to the roof, distinguishable from its twin, the North Tower, by the absence of a television antenna. On the 107th floor of this building was a popular tourist attraction called "Top of the World Trade Center Observatories," and on the roof was an outdoor observation deck accessible to the public and a disused helipad at the center. The address of this building was 2 World Trade Center, with the WTC complex having its own ZIP code of 10048.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Casualties of the September 11 attacks</span>

The September 11 attacks were the deadliest terrorist attacks in human history, causing the deaths of 2,996 people, including 2,977 victims and 19 hijackers who committed murder–suicide. Thousands more were injured, and long-term health effects have arisen as a consequence of the attacks. New York City took the brunt of the death toll when the Twin Towers of the World Trade Center complex in Lower Manhattan were attacked, with an estimated 1,600 victims from the North Tower and around a thousand from the South Tower. Two hundred miles southwest in Arlington County, Virginia, another 125 were killed in the Pentagon. The remaining 265 fatalities included the ninety-two passengers and crew of American Airlines Flight 11, the sixty-five aboard United Airlines Flight 175, the sixty-four on American Airlines Flight 77 and the forty-four who boarded United Airlines Flight 93. The attack on the World Trade Center's North Tower alone made the September 11 attacks the deadliest act of terrorism in human history.

Simpson Gumpertz & Heger Inc. (SGH) is a privately held ENR 500 engineering firm that designs, investigates, and rehabilitates structures and building enclosures. Their work encompasses commercial, institutional and residential buildings, transportation, water/wastewater, nuclear, science, and defense structure projects throughout the U.S. and over twenty foreign countries. SGH has 625 employees at eight offices in Atlanta, Boston, Chicago, Houston, New York City, Oakland, Southern California and Washington, D.C.

Architects & Engineers for 9/11 Truth, Inc. (AE911Truth) is an American non-profit organization promoting the conspiracy theory that the World Trade Center was destroyed in a controlled demolition, disputing accepted conclusions around the September 11 attacks, including the 9/11 Commission Report, as well as FEMA's "WTC Building Performance Study" (2002). Their claims and theories lack support among the relevant professional communities.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Structural integrity and failure</span> Ability of a structure to support a designed structural load without breaking

Structural integrity and failure is an aspect of engineering that deals with the ability of a structure to support a designed structural load without breaking and includes the study of past structural failures in order to prevent failures in future designs.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">2 World Trade Center</span> Unfinished skyscraper in Manhattan, New York

2 World Trade Center is a skyscraper being developed as part of the rebuilt World Trade Center complex in Manhattan, New York City. It will replace the original 2 World Trade Center, which was completed as part of the first World Trade Center in 1973 and subsequently destroyed during the September 11 attacks in 2001, and it will occupy the position of the original 5 World Trade Center. The foundation work was completed in 2013, though no construction has taken place since.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">World Trade Center (1973–2001)</span> Former development in Manhattan, New York

The original World Trade Center (WTC) was a complex of seven buildings in the Financial District of Lower Manhattan in New York City. Built primarily between 1966 and 1975, it was dedicated on April 4, 1973, and was destroyed during the September 11 attacks in 2001. At the time of their completion, the 110-story-tall Twin Towers, including the original 1 World Trade Center at 1,368 feet (417 m), and 2 World Trade Center at 1,362 feet (415.1 m), were the tallest buildings in the world; they were also the tallest twin skyscrapers in the world until 1996, when the Petronas Towers opened. Other buildings in the complex included the Marriott World Trade Center, 4 WTC, 5 WTC, 6 WTC, and 7 WTC. The complex contained 13,400,000 square feet (1,240,000 m2) of office space and, prior to its completion, was projected to accommodate an estimated 130,000 people.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">7 World Trade Center (1987–2001)</span> Office building in Manhattan, New York

7 World Trade Center, colloquially known as Building 7 or the Salomon Brothers Building, was an office building constructed as part of the original World Trade Center Complex in Lower Manhattan, New York City. The tower was located on a city block bounded by West Broadway, Vesey Street, Washington Street, and Barclay Street on the east, south, west, and north, respectively. It was developed by Larry Silverstein, who held a ground lease for the site from the Port Authority of New York and New Jersey, and designed by Emery Roth & Sons. It was destroyed during the September 11 attacks.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">5 World Trade Center (1970–2001)</span> Former building in Manhattan, New York

5 World Trade Center, also known as the Northeast Plaza Building, was a nine-story building in Lower Manhattan in New York City. Part of the World Trade Center complex, it opened in March 1972. The building was damaged during the September 11 attacks and later demolished. Its former site is now the location of the World Trade Center Transportation Hub and the proposed 2 World Trade Center.

References

  1. ↑ "Office fire test replication". NIST. 22 June 2007. Retrieved 11 September 2022.PD-icon.svg This article incorporates text from this source, which is in the public domain .
  2. 1 2 "NIST's Responsibility Under the National Construction Safety Team Act" (PDF). www.nist.gov. November 2012. Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-12-29.
  3. ↑ Banovic, S.W.; Foecke, T.; Luecke, W.E.; McColskey, J.D.; McCowan, C.N.; Siewert, T.A.; Gayle, F.W. (2007-11-01). "The role of metallurgy in the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center towers collapse". JOM. 59 (11): 22–30. Bibcode:2007JOM....59k..22B. doi:10.1007/s11837-007-0136-y. ISSN   1047-4838. S2CID   54171175.
  4. 1 2 Thompson, Kristy (2011-09-13). "FAQs - NIST WTC 7 Investigation". NIST. Retrieved 2016-09-14.
  5. 1 2 "National Commission on Terrorist Attacks Upon the United States". www.9-11commission.gov. Archived from the original on 2011-09-03. Retrieved 2016-09-14.
  6. ↑ Jensen Hughes. "Historical Survey of Multi-Story Building Collapses Due to Fire - Jensen Hughes". Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-07-05. Retrieved 2016-09-14.
  7. ↑ Eagar, Thomas W.; Musso, Christopher (2001). "Why did the world trade center collapse? Science, engineering, and speculation". JOM. 53 (12): 8–11. Bibcode:2001JOM....53l...8E. doi:10.1007/s11837-001-0003-1. ISSN   1047-4838. S2CID   56119666.
  8. 1 2 "Learning From 9/11--Understanding the Collapse of the World Trade Center". commdocs.house.gov. Archived from the original on 2016-03-03. Retrieved 2016-11-21.
  9. ↑ "FEMA 403, World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002) | FEMA.gov". www.fema.gov. Archived from the original on 2016-12-02. Retrieved 2016-11-21.
  10. ↑ "FEMA 403, World Trade Center Building Performance Study (2002), Executive Summary" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2017-01-25.
  11. ↑ Glanz, James (2002-05-01). "Report on Towers' Collapse Ends Mostly in Questions". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2018-01-29. Retrieved 2016-11-21.
  12. ↑ Glanz, James (2002-05-01). "Report on Towers' Collapse Ends Mostly in Questions". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 2018-01-29. Retrieved 2016-11-28.
  13. ↑ Thompson, Kristy (2011-04-27). "The National Fire Research Laboratory". NIST. Archived from the original on 2016-12-12. Retrieved 2016-11-28.
  14. ↑ "Public Law 107-231" (PDF). October 1, 2002. Archived (PDF) from the original on July 3, 2016.
  15. ↑ "NIST's Responsibilities Under the National Construction Safety Team Act" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-12-29.
  16. 1 2 Banovic, S. W.; Foecke, T.; Luecke, W. E.; McColskey, J. D.; McCowan, C. N.; Siewert, T. A.; Gayle, F. W. (2007-11-01). "The role of metallurgy in the NIST investigation of the World Trade Center towers collapse". JOM. 59 (11): 22–30. Bibcode:2007JOM....59k..22B. doi:10.1007/s11837-007-0136-y. ISSN   1047-4838. S2CID   54171175.
  17. 1 2 "NIST releases final WTC 7 investigation report". Archived from the original on 2018-02-07. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  18. ↑ "Why Did the World Trade Center Collapse? Science, Engineering, and Speculation". www.tms.org. Archived from the original on 2012-03-02. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  19. ↑ Ford, Susan Marie (2010-05-27). "National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (August 30, 2006)". NIST. Archived from the original on September 11, 2017. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  20. ↑ kristy.thompson@nist.gov (2011-09-14). "FAQs - NIST WTC Towers Investigation". NIST. Retrieved 2022-01-19.
  21. ↑ Ford, Susan Marie (2010-05-27). "National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) Federal Building and Fire Safety Investigation of the World Trade Center Disaster Answers to Frequently Asked Questions (August 30, 2006)". NIST. Archived from the original on September 11, 2017. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  22. ↑ "Designing for a Resilient America: A Stakeholder Summit on High Performance Resilient Buildings and Related Infrastructure" (PDF). Archived (PDF) from the original on 2016-09-28. Retrieved 2017-12-01.
  23. ↑ "A Decade of Difference". www.nfpa.org. Archived from the original on 2017-11-15. Retrieved 2017-12-01.
  24. ↑ Chao, Shih-Ho. "How building design changed after 9/11". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 2017-12-09. Retrieved 2017-12-01.
  25. ↑ "One World Trade Center rising on "super concrete" | Real Estate Weekly". Real Estate Weekly. 2011-06-01. Archived from the original on 2017-11-02. Retrieved 2017-12-01.
  26. ↑ Kman, Nicholas. "Disaster communications: Lessons from 9/11". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 2017-12-24. Retrieved 2017-11-30.
  27. ↑ Barkun, M. (2003). A Culture of Conspiracy: Apocalyptic Visions in Contemporary America. University of California Press. ISBN   978-0-520-23805-3.
  28. ↑ Walch, Tad (2006). "Controversy dogs Y.'s Jones". Utah news. Deseret News Publishing Company. Retrieved December 18, 2020.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.