Coal ball

Last updated

Coal ball
Coalball.jpg
A coal ball
Composition
Permineralised plant remains

A coal ball is a type of concretion, varying in shape from an imperfect sphere to a flat-lying, irregular slab. Coal balls were formed in Carboniferous Period swamps and mires, when peat was prevented from being turned into coal by the high amount of calcite surrounding the peat; the calcite caused it to be turned into stone instead. As such, despite not actually being made of coal, the coal ball owes its name to its similar origins as well as its similar shape with actual coal.

Contents

Coal balls often preserve a remarkable record of the microscopic tissue structure of Carboniferous swamp and mire plants, which would otherwise have been completely destroyed. Their unique preservation of Carboniferous plants makes them valuable to scientists, who cut and peel the coal balls to research the geological past.

In 1855, two English scientists, Joseph Dalton Hooker and Edward William Binney, made the first scientific description of coal balls in England, and the initial research on coal balls was carried out in Europe. North American coal balls were discovered and identified in 1922. Coal balls have since been found in other countries, leading to the discovery of hundreds of species and genera.

Coal balls may be found in coal seams across North America and Eurasia. North American coal balls are more widespread, both stratigraphically and geologically, than those in Europe. The oldest known coal balls date from the Namurian stage of the Carboniferous; they were found in Germany and on the territory of former Czechoslovakia.

Introduction to the scientific world, and formation

Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker, who along with Edward William Binney was the first to report on coal balls Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker.jpg
Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker, who along with Edward William Binney was the first to report on coal balls

The first scientific description of coal balls was made in 1855 by Sir Joseph Dalton Hooker and Edward William Binney, who reported on examples in the coal seams of Yorkshire and Lancashire, England. European scientists did much of the early research. [1] [2]

Coal balls in North America were first found in Iowa coal seams in 1894, [3] [4] although the connection to European coal balls was not made until Adolf Carl Noé (whose coal ball was found by Gilbert Cady [3] [5] ) drew the parallel in 1922. [2] Noé's work renewed interest in coal balls, and by the 1930s had drawn paleobotanists from Europe to the Illinois Basin in search of them. [6]

There are two theories – the autochthonous ( in situ ) theory and the allochthonous (drift) theory – that attempt to explain the formation of coal balls, although the subject is mostly speculation. [7]

Supporters of the in situ theory believe that close to its present location organic matter accumulated near a peat bog and, shortly after burial, underwent permineralisation  – minerals seeped into the organic matter and formed an internal cast. [8] [9] Water with a high dissolved mineral content was buried with the plant matter in a peat bog. As the dissolved ions crystallised, the mineral matter precipitated out. This caused concretions containing plant material to form and preserve as rounded lumps of stone. Coalification was thus prevented, and the peat was preserved and eventually became a coal ball. [10] The majority of coal balls are found in bituminous and anthracite coal seams, [11] in locations where the peat was not compressed sufficiently to render the material into coal. [10]

Marie Stopes and David Watson analysed coal ball samples and decided that coal balls formed in situ. They stressed the importance of interaction with seawater, believing that it was necessary for the formation of coal balls. [12] Some supporters of the in situ theory believe that Stopes' and Watson's discovery of a plant stem extending through multiple coal balls shows that coal balls formed in situ, stating that the drift theory fails to explain Stopes' and Watson's observation. They also cite fragile pieces of organic material projecting outside some coal balls, contending that if the drift theory was correct, the projections would have been destroyed, [13] and some large coal balls are large enough that they could never have been able to be transported in the first place. [14]

The drift theory holds that the organic material did not form in or near its present location. Rather, it asserts that the material that would become a coal ball was transported from another location by means of a flood or a storm. [15] Some supporters of the drift theory, such as Sergius Mamay and Ellis Yochelson, believed that the presence of marine animals in coal balls proved material was transported from a marine to a non-marine environment. [16] Edward C. Jeffrey, stating that the in situ theory had "no good evidence", believed that the formation of coal balls from transported material was likely because coal balls often included material formed by transport and sedimentation in open water. [17]

Contents

Calcite (middle) and dolomite (top and bottom) are common materials found in coal balls. Coal ball structures.jpg
Calcite (middle) and dolomite (top and bottom) are common materials found in coal balls.

Coal balls are not made of coal; [18] [19] they are non-flammable and useless for fuel. Coal balls are calcium-rich permineralised life forms, [20] mostly containing calcium and magnesium carbonates, pyrite, and quartz. [21] [22] Other minerals, including gypsum, illite, kaolinite, and lepidocrocite also appear in coal balls, albeit in lesser quantities. [23] Although coal balls are usually about the size of a man's fist, [24] their sizes vary greatly, ranging from that of a walnut up to 3 feet (1 m) in diameter. [25] Coal balls have been found that were smaller than a thimble. [19]

Coal balls commonly contain dolomites, aragonite, and masses of organic matter at various stages of decomposition. [10] Hooker and Binney analysed a coal ball and found "a lack of coniferous wood ... and fronds of ferns" and noted that the discovered plant matter "appear[ed] to [have been arranged] just as they fell from the plants that produced them". [26] Coal balls usually do not preserve the leaves of plants. [27]

In 1962, Sergius Mamay and Ellis Yochelson analysed North American coal balls. [28] Their discovery of marine organisms led to classification of coal balls were sorted into three types: normal (sometimes known as floral), containing only plant matter; faunal, containing animal fossils only; and mixed, containing both plant and animal material. [29] Mixed coal balls are further divided into heterogeneous, where the plant and animal material was distinctly separated; and homogeneous, lacking that separation. [30]

Preservation

The quality of preservation in coal balls varies from no preservation to the point of being able to analyse the cellular structures. [9] Some coal balls contain preserved root hairs, [31] pollen, [32] and spores, [32] and are described as being "more or less perfectly preserved", [33] containing "not what used to be the plant", but rather, the plant itself. [34] Others have been found to be "botanically worthless", [35] with the organic matter having deteriorated before becoming a coal ball. [36] Coal balls with well-preserved contents are useful to paleobotanists. [37] They have been used to analyse the geographical distribution of vegetation: for example, providing evidence that Ukrainian and Oklahoman plants of the tropical belt were once the same. [38] Research on coal balls has also led to the discovery of more than 130 genera and 350 species. [1]

Three main factors determine the quality of preserved material in a coal ball: the mineral constituents, the speed of the burial process, and the degree of compression before undergoing permineralisation. [39] Generally, coal balls resulting from remains that have a quick burial with little decay and pressure are better preserved, although plant remains in most coal balls almost always show differing signs of decay and collapse. [10] Coal balls containing quantities of iron sulfide have far lower preservation than coal balls permineralised by magnesium or calcium carbonate, [10] [40] [41] which has earned iron sulfide the title "chief curse of the coal ball hunter". [31]

Distribution

A coal ball from southern Illinois Coal ball from southern illinois.JPG
A coal ball from southern Illinois

Coal balls were first found in England, [42] and later in other parts of the world, including Australia, [15] [43] Belgium, the Netherlands, the former Czechoslovakia, Germany, Ukraine, [44] China, [45] and Spain. [46] They were also encountered in North America, where they are geographically widespread compared to Europe; [1] in the United States, coal balls have been found from Kansas to the Illinois Basin to the Appalachian region. [32] [47]

The oldest coal balls were from the early end of the Namurian stage (326 to 313 mya) and discovered in Germany and former Czechoslovakia, [1] but their ages generally range from the Permian (299 to 251 mya) to the Upper Carboniferous. [48] Some coal balls from the US vary in age from the later end of the Westphalian (roughly 313 to 304 mya) to the later Stephanian (roughly 304 to 299 mya). European coal balls are generally from the early end of the Westphalian Stage. [1]

In coal seams, coal balls are completely surrounded by coal. [49] They are often found randomly scattered throughout the seam in isolated groups, [37] usually in the upper half of the seam. Their occurrence in coal seams can be either extremely sporadic or regular; many coal seams have been found to contain no coal balls, [18] [41] while others have been found to contain so many coal balls that miners avoid the area entirely. [47]

Analytical methods

A thin section of a plant stem depicting calcite crystals. Coal ball thin section1.jpg
A thin section of a plant stem depicting calcite crystals.

Thin sectioning was an early procedure used to analyse fossilised material contained in coal balls. [50] The process required cutting a coal ball with a diamond saw, then flattening and polishing the thin section with an abrasive. [51] It would be glued to a slide and placed under a petrographic microscope for examination. [52] Although the process could be done with a machine, the large amount of time needed and the poor quality of samples produced by thin sectioning gave way to a more convenient method. [53] [54]

The thin section technique was superseded by the now-common liquid-peel technique in 1928. [7] [50] [53] In this technique, [55] [56] [57] peels are obtained by cutting the surface of a coal ball with a diamond saw, grinding the cut surface on a glass plate with silicon carbide to a smooth finish, and etching the cut and the surface with hydrochloric acid. [54] The acid dissolves the mineral matter from the coal ball, leaving a projecting layer of plant cells. After applying acetone, a piece of cellulose acetate is placed on the coal ball. This embeds the cells preserved in the coal ball into the cellulose acetate. Upon drying, the cellulose acetate can be removed from the coal ball with a razor and the obtained peel can be stained with a low-acidity stain and observed under a microscope. Up to 50 peels can be extracted from 2 millimetres (0.079 in) of coal ball with this method. [54]

However, the peels will degrade over time if they contain any iron sulfide (pyrite or marcasite). Shya Chitaley addressed this problem by revising the liquid-peel technique to separate the organic material preserved by the coal ball from the inorganic minerals, including iron sulfide. This allows the peel to retain its quality for a longer time. [58] Chitaley's revisions begin after grinding the surface of the coal ball to a smooth finish. Her process essentially entails heating and then making multiple applications of solutions of paraffin in xylene to the coal ball. Each subsequent application has a greater concentration of paraffin in xylene to allow the wax to completely pervade the coal ball. Nitric acid, and then acetone, are applied to the coal ball. [59] Following that, the process merges back into the liquid peel technique.

X-ray powder diffraction has also been used to analyse coal balls. [60] The X-rays of a predetermined wavelength are sent through a sample to examine its structure. This reveals information about the crystallographic structure, chemical composition, and physical properties of the examined material. The scattered intensity of the X-ray pattern is observed and analysed, with the measurements consisting of incident and scattered angle, polarisation, and wavelength or energy. [61]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carboniferous</span> Fifth period of the Paleozoic Era, 359–299 million years ago

The Carboniferous is a geologic period and system of the Paleozoic that spans 60 million years from the end of the Devonian Period 358.9 million years ago (mya), to the beginning of the Permian Period, 298.9 mya. In North America, the Carboniferous is often treated as two separate geological periods, the earlier Mississippian and the later Pennsylvanian.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bituminous coal</span> Collective term for higher quality coal

Bituminous coal, or black coal, is a type of coal containing a tar-like substance called bitumen or asphalt. Its coloration can be black or sometimes dark brown; often there are well-defined bands of bright and dull material within the seams. It is typically hard but friable. Its quality is ranked higher than lignite and sub-bituminous coal, but lesser than anthracite. It is the most abundant rank of coal, with deposits found around the world, often in rocks of Carboniferous age. Bituminous coal is formed from sub-bituminous coal that is buried deeply enough to be heated to 85 °C (185 °F) or higher.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Palynology</span> Study of microorganisms and microfossils composed acid-resistant, organic material

Palynology is the study of microorganisms and microscopic fragments of mega-organisms that are composed of acid-resistant organic material and occur in sediments, sedimentary rocks, and even some metasedimentary rocks. Palynomorphs are the microscopic, acid-resistant organic remains and debris produced by a wide variety plants, animals, and Protista that have existed since the late Proterozoic.

Edward William Binney FRS, FGS (1812–1882) was an English geologist.

Seatearth is a British coal mining term that is used in the geological literature. As noted by Jackson, a seatearth is the layer of sedimentary rock underlying a coal seam. Seatearths have also been called seat earth, "seat rock", or "seat stone" in the geologic literature. Depending on its physical characteristics, a number of different names, such as underclay, fireclay, flint clay, and ganister, can be applied to a specific seatearth.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cannel coal</span> Type of bituminous coal or oil shale

Cannel coal or candle coal is a type of bituminous coal, also classified as terrestrial type oil shale. Due to its physical morphology and low mineral content cannel coal is considered to be coal but by its texture and composition of the organic matter it is considered to be oil shale. Although historically the term cannel coal has been used interchangeably with boghead coal, a more recent classification system restricts cannel coal to terrestrial origin, and boghead coal to lacustrine environments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Coal forest</span> Land type during the late Carboniferous and Permian times

Coal forests were the vast swathes of swamps and riparian forests that covered much of the land on Earth's tropical regions during the late Carboniferous (Pennsylvanian) and Permian periods. As plant matter from these forests decayed, enormous deposits of peat accumulated, which later became buried and converted into coal over the subsequent eras.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyclothems</span> Alternating sequences of marine and non-marine sediments

In geology, cyclothems are alternating stratigraphic sequences of marine and non-marine sediments, sometimes interbedded with coal seams. Historically, the term was defined by the European coal geologists who worked in coal basins formed during the Carboniferous and earliest Permian periods. The cyclothems consist of repeated sequences, each typically several meters thick, of sandstone resting upon an erosional surface, passing upwards to pelites and topped by coal.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Pottsville Formation</span>

The Pennsylvanian Pottsville Formation is a mapped bedrock unit in Pennsylvania, western Maryland, West Virginia, Ohio, and Alabama. It is a major ridge-former in the Ridge-and-Valley Appalachians of the eastern United States. The Pottsville Formation is conspicuous at many sites along the Allegheny Front, the eastern escarpment of the Allegheny or Appalachian Plateau.

<i>Euproops</i> Genus of horseshoe crab relatives

Euproops Meek, 1867, is an extinct genus of xiphosuran, related to the modern horseshoe crab. It lived during the Carboniferous Period.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Allegheny Group</span>

The Allegheny Group, often termed the Allegheny Formation, is a Pennsylvanian-age geological unit in the Appalachian Plateau. It is a major coal-bearing unit in the eastern United States, extending through western and central Pennsylvania, western Maryland and West Virginia, and southeastern Ohio. Fossils of fishes such as Bandringa are known from the Kittaning Formation, which is part of the Allegheny Group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Permineralization</span> Type of fossilization

Permineralization is a process of fossilization of bones and tissues in which mineral deposits form internal casts of organisms. Carried by water, these minerals fill the spaces within organic tissue. Because of the nature of the casts, permineralization is particularly useful in studies of the internal structures of organisms, usually of plants.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medullosales</span> Extinct order of Late Carboniferous seed ferns

The Medullosales is an extinct order of pteridospermous seed plants characterised by large ovules with circular cross-section and a vascularised nucellus, complex pollen-organs, stems and rachides with a dissected stele, and frond-like leaves. Their nearest still-living relatives are the cycads.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Molteno Formation</span> Triassic geological formation in the Stormberg Group in Lesotho and South Africa

The Molteno Formation is a geological formation found in several localities in Lesotho and South Africa. It lies mainly south of Maseru, near Burgersdorp, Aliwal North, Dordrecht, Molteno, and Elliot. It extends as far north as Matatiele in the Eastern Cape. The formation's localities lie along the Drakensberg Mountains in Kwazulu-Natal, and near Ladybrand in the Free State of South Africa. The Molteno Formation is the lowermost of the three formations in the Stormberg Group of the greater Karoo Supergroup. The Molteno Formation represents the initial phase of preserved sedimentation of the Stormberg Group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Carboniferous rainforest collapse</span> Extinction event at the end of the Moscovian in the Carboniferous

The Carboniferous rainforest collapse (CRC) was a minor extinction event that occurred around 305 million years ago in the Carboniferous period. It altered the vast coal forests that covered the equatorial region of Euramerica. This event may have fragmented the forests into isolated refugia or ecological "islands", which in turn encouraged dwarfism and, shortly after, extinction of many plant and animal species. Following the event, coal-forming tropical forests continued in large areas of the Earth, but their extent and composition were changed.

Adolf Carl Noé was an Austrian-born paleobotanist. He is credited for identifying the first coal ball in the United States in 1922, which renewed interest in them. He also developed a method of peeling coal balls using nitrocellulose. Many of the paleobotanical materials owned by the University of Chicago's Walker Museum were provided by Noé, where he was also a curator of fossil plants. He was also a research associate at the Field Museum of Natural History, where he assisted with their reconstruction of a Carboniferous forest.

<i>Macroneuropteris</i> Extinct genus of plants

Macroneuropteris is a genus of Carboniferous seed plants in the order Medullosales. The genus is best known for the species Macroneuropteris scheuchzeri, a medium-size tree that was common throughout the late Carboniferous Euramerica. Three similar species, M. macrophylla, M. britannica and M. subauriculata are also included in the genus.

<i>Arthropitys</i> Extinct genus of ferns

Arthropitys is an extinct genus of calamitacean equisetale. The petrified fossils of Arthropitys bistriata, the type species, can be found at Chemnitz petrified forest, Chemnitz, Germany. The genus existed from the Carboniferous (Bashkirian) until the Early Triassic (Olenekian).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sorthat Formation</span>

The Sorthat Formation is a geologic formation on the island of Bornholm, Denmark and in the Rønne Graben in the Baltic Sea. It is of Latest Pliensbachian to Late Toarcian age. Plant fossils have been recovered from the formation, along with several traces of invertebrate animals. The Sorthat Formation is overlain by fluvial to lacustrine gravels, along with sands, clay and in some places coal beds that are part of the Aalenian-Bathonian Bagå Formation. Until 2003, the Sorthat Formation was included as the lowermost part of the Bagå Formation, recovering the latest Pliensbachian to lower Aalenian boundary. The Sorthat strata reflect a mostly marginally deltaic to marine unit. Large streams fluctuated to the east, where a large river system was established at the start of the Toarcian. In the northwest, local volcanism that started in the lower Pliensbachian extended along the North Sea, mostly from southern Sweden. At this time, the Central Skåne Volcanic Province and the Egersund Basin expelled most of their material, with influences on the local tectonics. The Egersund Basin has abundant fresh porphyritic nephelinite lavas and dykes of lower Jurassic age, with a composition nearly identical to those found in the clay pits. That indicates the transport of strata from the continental margin by large fluvial channels of the Sorthat and the connected Röddinge Formation that ended in the sea deposits of the Ciechocinek Formation green series.

Eobaphetes is an extinct genus of embolomere which likely lived in the Pennsylvanian of Kansas. The genus is based on several skull and jaw fragments of a single individual. They were originally described under the species Erpetosuchus kansasensis, but this was later changed to Eobaphetes kansasensis when it was determined that Erpetosuchus was preoccupied by a Triassic reptile.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 Scott & Rex 1985, p. 124.
  2. 1 2 Noé 1923a, p. 385.
  3. 1 2 Darrah & Lyons 1995, p. 176.
  4. Andrews 1946, p. 334.
  5. Leighton & Peppers 2011.
  6. Phillips, Pfefferkorn & Peppers 1973, p. 24.
  7. 1 2 Phillips, Avcin & Berggren 1976, p. 17.
  8. Hooker & Binney 1855, p. 149.
  9. 1 2 Perkins 1976, p. 1.
  10. 1 2 3 4 5 Phillips, Avcin & Berggren 1976, p. 6.
  11. Cleveland Museum of Natural History.
  12. Stopes & Watson 1909, p. 212.
  13. Feliciano 1924, p. 233.
  14. Andrews 1951, p. 434.
  15. 1 2 Kindle 1934, p. 757.
  16. Darrah & Lyons 1995, p. 317.
  17. Jeffrey 1917, p. 211.
  18. 1 2 Andrews 1951, p. 432.
  19. 1 2 Andrews 1946, p. 327.
  20. Scott & Rex 1985, p. 123.
  21. Lomax 1903, p. 811.
  22. Gabel & Dyche 1986, p. 99.
  23. Demaris 2000, p. 224.
  24. Evening Independent 1923, p. 13.
  25. Feliciano 1924, p. 230.
  26. Hooker & Binney 1855, p. 150.
  27. Evans & Amos 1961, p. 452.
  28. Scott & Rex 1985, p. 126.
  29. Lyons et al. 1984, p. 228.
  30. Mamay & Yochelson 1962, p. 196.
  31. 1 2 Andrews 1946, p. 330.
  32. 1 2 3 Phillips, Avcin & Berggren 1976, p. 7.
  33. Seward 1898, p. 86.
  34. Phillips.
  35. Baxter 1951, p. 528.
  36. Andrews 1951, p. 437.
  37. 1 2 Nelson 1983, p. 41.
  38. Phillips & Peppers 1984, p. 206.
  39. Andrews 1946, pp. 329–330.
  40. Noé 1923b, p. 344.
  41. 1 2 Mamay & Yochelson 1962, p. 195.
  42. Hooker & Binney 1855, p. 1.
  43. Feliciano 1924, p. 231.
  44. Galtier 1997, p. 54.
  45. Scott & Rex 1985, pp. 124–125.
  46. Galtier 1997, p. 59.
  47. 1 2 Andrews 1951, p. 433.
  48. Jones & Rowe 1999, p. 206.
  49. Stopes & Watson 1909, p. 173.
  50. 1 2 Phillips, Pfefferkorn & Peppers 1973, p. 26.
  51. Darrah & Lyons 1995, p. 177.
  52. Baxter 1951, p. 531.
  53. 1 2 Scott & Rex 1985, p. 125.
  54. 1 2 3 Seward 2010, p. 48.
  55. Gabel & Dyche 1986, pp. 99, 101.
  56. Andrews 1946, pp. 327–328.
  57. Smithsonian Institution 2007.
  58. Jones & Rowe 1999, p. 89–90.
  59. Chitaley 1985, p. 302–303.
  60. Demaris 2000, p. 221.
  61. University of Santa Barbara, California 2011.

Bibliography

Further reading