Computer forensics

A forensic expert examining a mobile device that was seized during an investigation

Media types used for computer forensic analysis: a Fujifilm FinePix digital camera, two flash memory cards, a USB flash drive, a 5GB iPod, a CD-R or DVD recordable, and a Mini CD.

Computer forensics (also known as computer forensic science) ^[1] is a branch of digital forensic science pertaining to evidence found in computers and digital storage media. The goal of computer forensics is to examine digital media in a forensically sound manner with the aim of identifying, preserving, recovering, analyzing, and presenting facts and opinions about the digital information.

Although it is most often associated with the investigation of a wide variety of computer crime, computer forensics may also be used in civil proceedings. The discipline involves similar techniques and principles to data recovery, but with additional guidelines and practices designed to create a legal audit trail.

Evidence from computer forensics investigations is usually subjected to the same guidelines and practices as other digital evidence. It has been used in a number of high-profile cases and is accepted as reliable within U.S. and European court systems.

Overview

In the early 1980s, personal computers became more accessible to consumers, leading to their increased use in criminal activity (for example, to help commit fraud). At the same time, several new "computer crimes" were recognized (such as cracking). The discipline of computer forensics emerged during this time as a method to recover and investigate digital evidence for use in court. Since then, computer crime and computer-related crime has grown, with the FBI reporting a suspected 791,790 internet crimes in 2020, a 69% increase over the amount reported in 2019. ^{[2] [3]} Today, computer forensics is used to investigate a wide variety of crimes, including child pornography, fraud, espionage, cyberstalking, murder, and rape. The discipline also features in civil proceedings as a form of information gathering (e.g., Electronic discovery).

Forensic techniques and expert knowledge are used to explain the current state of a digital artifact, such as a computer system, storage medium (e.g., hard disk or CD-ROM), or an electronic document (e.g., an email message or JPEG image). ^[4] The scope of a forensic analysis can vary from simple information retrieval to reconstructing a series of events. In a 2002 book, Computer Forensics, authors Kruse and Heiser define computer forensics as involving "the preservation, identification, extraction, documentation and interpretation of computer data". ^[5] They describe the discipline as "more of an art than a science," indicating that forensic methodology is backed by flexibility and extensive domain knowledge. However, while several methods can be used to extract evidence from a given computer, the strategies used by law enforcement are fairly rigid and lack the flexibility found in the civilian world. ^[6]

Cybersecurity

Computer forensics is often confused with cybersecurity. Cybersecurity focuses on prevention and protection, while computer forensics is more reactionary and active, involving activities such as tracking and exposing. System security usually encompasses two teams: cybersecurity and computer forensics, which work together. A cybersecurity team creates systems and programs to protect data; if these fail, the computer forensics team recovers the data and investigates the intrusion and theft. Both areas require knowledge of computer science. ^[7]

Computer-related crimes

Computer forensics are used to convict those involved in physical and digital crimes. Some of these computer-related crimes include interruption, interception, copyright infringement, and fabrication. Interruption relates to the destruction and stealing of computer parts and digital files. Interception is the unauthorized access of files and information stored on technological devices. ^[8] Copyright infringement refers to using, reproducing, and distributing copyrighted information, including software piracy. Fabrication involves accusing someone of using false data and information inserted into the system through an unauthorized source. Examples of interceptions include the Bank NSP case, Sony.Sambandh.com case, and business email compromise scams. ^[9]

Use as evidence

In court, computer forensic evidence is subject to the usual requirements for digital evidence. This requires that information be authentic, reliably obtained, and admissible. ^[10] Different countries have specific guidelines and practices for evidence recovery. In the United Kingdom, examiners often follow Association of Chief Police Officers guidelines that help ensure the authenticity and integrity of evidence. While voluntary, the guidelines are widely accepted in British courts.

Computer forensics has been used as evidence in criminal law since the mid-1980s. Some notable examples include: ^[11]

• BTK Killer: Dennis Rader was convicted of a string of serial killings over sixteen years. Towards the end of this period, Rader sent letters to the police on a floppy disk. ^[12] Metadata within the documents implicated an author named "Dennis" at "Christ Lutheran Church," helping lead to Rader's arrest. ^[13]
• Joseph Edward Duncan: A spreadsheet recovered from Duncan's computer contained evidence showing him planning his crimes. Prosecutors used this to demonstrate premeditation and secure the death penalty. ^[14]
• Sharon Lopatka: Hundreds of emails on Lopatka's computer led investigators to her killer, Robert Glass. ^[11]
• Corcoran Group: In this case, computer forensics confirmed parties' duties to preserve digital evidence when litigation had commenced or was reasonably anticipated. Hard drives were analyzed, though the expert found no evidence of deletion, and evidence showed that the defendants intentionally destroyed emails. ^[11]
• Dr. Conrad Murray: Dr. Conrad Murray, the doctor of Michael Jackson, was convicted partially by digital evidence, including medical documentation showing lethal amounts of propofol.

Forensic process

Main article: Digital forensic process

A portable Tableau write blocker attached to a hard drive

Computer forensic investigations typically follow the standard digital forensic process, consisting of four phases: acquisition, examination, analysis, and reporting. Investigations are usually performed on static data (i.e., acquired images) rather than "live" systems. This differs from early forensic practices, when a lack of specialized tools often required investigators to work on live data.

Computer forensics lab

The computer forensics lab is a secure environment where electronic data can be preserved, managed, and accessed under controlled conditions, minimizing the risk of damage or alteration to the evidence. Forensic examiners are provided with the resources necessary to extract meaningful data from the devices they examine. ^[15]

Techniques

Various techniques are used in computer forensic investigations, including:

Cross-drive analysis

This technique correlates information found on multiple hard drives and can be used to identify social networks or detect anomalies. ^{[16] [17]}

Live analysis

The examination of computers from within the operating system using forensic or existing sysadmin tools to extract evidence. This technique is particularly useful for dealing with encrypting file systems where encryption keys can be retrieved, or for imaging the logical hard drive volume (a live acquisition) before shutting down the computer. Live analysis is also beneficial when examining networked systems or cloud-based devices that cannot be accessed physically. ^[18]

Deleted files

A common forensic technique involves recovering deleted files. Most operating systems and file systems do not erase the physical file data, allowing investigators to reconstruct it from the physical disk sectors. Forensic software can "carve" files by searching for known file headers and reconstructing deleted data.

Stochastic forensics

This method leverages the stochastic properties of a system to investigate activities without traditional digital artifacts, often useful in cases of data theft.

Steganography

Steganography involves concealing data within another file, such as hiding illegal content within an image. Forensic investigators detect steganography by comparing file hashes, as any hidden data will alter the hash value of the file.

Mobile device forensics

Phone logs

Phone companies typically retain logs of received calls, which can help create timelines and establish suspects' locations at the time of a crime. ^[19]

Contacts

Contact lists are useful in narrowing down suspects based on their connections to the victim. ^[19]

Text messages

Text messages contain timestamps and remain in company servers, often indefinitely, even if deleted from the device. These records are valuable evidence for reconstructing communication between individuals. ^[19]

Photos

Photos can provide critical evidence, supporting or disproving alibis by showing the location and time they were taken. ^[19]

Audio recordings

Some victims may have recorded pivotal moments, capturing details like the attacker's voice, which could provide crucial evidence. ^[19]

Volatile data

Volatile data is stored in memory or in transit and is lost when the computer is powered down. It resides in locations such as registries, cache, and RAM. The investigation of volatile data is referred to as "live forensics."

When seizing evidence, if a machine is still active, volatile data stored solely in RAM may be lost if not recovered before shutting down the system. "Live analysis" can be used to recover RAM data (e.g., using Microsoft's COFEE tool, WinDD, WindowsSCOPE) before removing the machine. Tools like CaptureGUARD Gateway allow for the acquisition of physical memory from a locked computer.^{[ citation needed ]}

RAM data can sometimes be recovered after power loss, as the electrical charge in memory cells dissipates slowly. Techniques like the cold boot attack exploit this property. Lower temperatures and higher voltages increase the chance of recovery, but it is often impractical to implement these techniques in field investigations.

Tools that extract volatile data often require the computer to be in a forensic lab to maintain the chain of evidence. In some cases, a live desktop can be transported using tools like a mouse jiggler to prevent sleep mode and an uninterruptible power supply (UPS) to maintain power.

Page files from file systems with journaling features, such as NTFS and ReiserFS, can also be reassembled to recover RAM data stored during system operation.

Analysis tools

See also: List of digital forensics tools

Numerous open-source and commercial tools exist for computer forensics. Common forensic analysis includes manual reviews of media, Windows registry analysis, password cracking, keyword searches, and the extraction of emails and images. Tools such as Autopsy (software), Belkasoft Evidence Center, Forensic Toolkit (FTK), and EnCase are widely used in digital forensics.

Professional education and careers

Digital forensics analyst

A digital forensics analyst is responsible for preserving digital evidence, cataloging collected evidence, analyzing evidence relevant to the ongoing case, responding to cyber breaches (often in a corporate context), writing reports containing findings, and testifying in court. ^[20] A digital forensic analyst may also be referred to as a computer forensic analyst, digital forensic examiner, cyber forensic analyst, forensic technician, or other similarly named titles, though these roles perform similar duties. ^[21]

Certifications

Several computer forensics certifications are available, such as the ISFCE Certified Computer Examiner, Digital Forensics Investigation Professional (DFIP), and IACRB Certified Computer Forensics Examiner. The top vendor-independent certification, particularly within the EU, is the Certified Cyber Forensics Professional (CCFP). ^{[22] [23]}

Many commercial forensic software companies also offer proprietary certifications. ^[24]

See also

• Certified Forensic Computer Examiner
• Counter forensics
• Cryptanalysis
• Cyber attribution
• Data remanence
• Disk encryption
• Encryption
• Hidden file and hidden directory
• Information technology audit
• MAC times
• Steganalysis
• United States v. Arnold

References

1. Michael G. Noblett; Mark M. Pollitt; Lawrence A. Presley (October 2000). "Recovering and examining computer forensic evidence" . Retrieved 26 July 2010.
2. "2020 Internet Crime Report" (PDF). IC3.gov.
3. "IC3 Releases 2020 Internet Crime Report". Federal Bureau of Investigation.
4. Yasinsac, A.; Erbacher, R.F.; Marks, D.G.; Pollitt, M.M.; Sommer, P.M. (July 2003). "Computer forensics education". IEEE Security & Privacy. 1 (4): 15–23. doi:10.1109/MSECP.2003.1219052.
5. Warren G. Kruse; Jay G. Heiser (2002). Computer forensics: incident response essentials . Addison-Wesley. p.  392. ISBN   978-0-201-70719-9 . Retrieved 6 December 2010.
6. Gunsch, G (August 2002). "An Examination of Digital Forensic Models" (PDF).
7. "What Is Computer Forensics?". Western Governors University.
8. Kruse II, Warren G.; Heiser, Jay G. (2001). Computer Forensics: Incident Response Essentials. Pearson Education. ISBN   978-0-672-33408-5.
9. Sabry, Fouad (2022). Digital Forensics: How digital forensics is helping to bring the work of crime scene investigating into the real world. One Billion Knowledgeable. ISBN   978-1-792-30942-6.{{cite book}}: Check |isbn= value: checksum (help)
10. Adams, R. (2012). "'The Advanced Data Acquisition Model (ADAM): A process model for digital forensic practice".
11. Casey, Eoghan (2004). Digital Evidence and Computer Crime, Second Edition. Elsevier. ISBN   978-0-12-163104-8.
12. "The Capture of Serial Killer Dennis Rader, BTK". Psychology Today.
13. Dooley, Sean. "BTK serial killer's daughter: 'We were living our normal life... Then everything upended on us'". ABC News.
14. Various (2009). Eoghan Casey (ed.). Handbook of Digital Forensics and Investigation. Academic Press. p. 567. ISBN   978-0-12-374267-4 . Retrieved 27 August 2010.
15. "Chapter 3: Computer Forensic Fundamentals - Investigative Computer Forensics: The Practical Guide for Lawyers, Accountants, Investigators, and Business Executives [Book]". www.oreilly.com. Retrieved 2022-03-04.
16. Garfinkel, Simson L. (2006-09-01). "Forensic feature extraction and cross-drive analysis". Digital Investigation. The Proceedings of the 6th Annual Digital Forensic Research Workshop (DFRWS '06). 3: 71–81. doi: 10.1016/j.diin.2006.06.007 . ISSN   1742-2876.
17. David, Anne; Morris, Sarah; Appleby-Thomas, Gareth (2020-08-20). "A Two-Stage Model for Social Network Investigations in Digital Forensics" (PDF). Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law. 15 (2). doi: 10.15394/jdfsl.2020.1667 . ISSN   1558-7223. S2CID   221692362.
18. https://espace.curtin.edu.au/bitstream/handle/20.500.11937/93974/Adams%20RB%202023%20Public.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y
19. Pollard, Carol (2008). Computer Forensics for Dummies. John Wiley & Sons, Incorporated. pp. 219–230. ISBN   9780470434956.
20. "What Is a Digital Forensic Analyst?". EC Council. 2022-12-28. Archived from the original on 2022-11-28. Retrieved 2022-12-28.
21. "CISA Cyber Defense Forensics Analyst". Cybersecurity & Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA). 2022-12-28. Archived from the original on 2022-11-05. Retrieved 2022-12-28.
22. "Cybersecurity Certification". isc2.org. Retrieved 2022-11-18.
23. "CCFP Salaries surveys". ITJobsWatch. Archived from the original on 2017-01-19. Retrieved 2017-06-15.
24. "X-PERT Certification Program". X-pert.eu. Retrieved 2015-11-26.

Further reading

• A Practice Guide to Computer Forensics, First Edition (Paperback) by David Benton (Author), Frank Grindstaff (Author)
• Casey, Eoghan; Stellatos, Gerasimos J. (2008). "The impact of full disk encryption on digital forensics". Operating Systems Review. 42 (3): 93–98. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.178.3917 . doi:10.1145/1368506.1368519. S2CID   5793873.
• YiZhen Huang; YangJing Long (2008). "Demosaicking recognition with applications in digital photo authentication based on a quadratic pixel correlation model" (PDF). Proc. IEEE Conference on Computer Vision and Pattern Recognition: 1–8. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2010-06-17. Retrieved 2009-12-18.
• Incident Response and Computer Forensics, Second Edition (Paperback) by Chris Prosise (Author), Kevin Mandia (Author), Matt Pepe (Author) "Truth is stranger than fiction..." (more)
• Ross, S.; Gow, A. (1999). Digital archaeology? Rescuing Neglected or Damaged Data Resources (PDF). Bristol & London: British Library and Joint Information Systems Committee. ISBN   978-1-900508-51-3.
• George M. Mohay (2003). Computer and intrusion forensics. Artech House. p. 395. ISBN   978-1-58053-369-0.
• Chuck Easttom (2013). System Forensics, Investigation, and Response. Jones & Bartlett. p. 318. ISBN   978-1284031058. Archived from the original on 2013-06-14. Retrieved 2013-09-23.

Related journals

• IEEE Transactions on Information Forensics and Security
• Journal of Digital Forensics, Security and Law
• International Journal of Digital Crime and Forensics
• Journal of Digital Investigation
• International Journal of Digital Evidence
• International Journal of Forensic Computer Science
• Journal of Digital Forensic Practice
• Cryptologia
• Small Scale Digital Device Forensic Journal