Forensic chemistry

Last updated

A U.S. Customs and Border Protection chemist reads a DNA profile to determine the origin of a commodity CBP chemist reads a DNA profile.jpg
A U.S. Customs and Border Protection chemist reads a DNA profile to determine the origin of a commodity

Forensic chemistry is the application of chemistry and its subfield, forensic toxicology, in a legal setting. A forensic chemist can assist in the identification of unknown materials found at a crime scene. [1] Specialists in this field have a wide array of methods and instruments to help identify unknown substances. These include high-performance liquid chromatography, gas chromatography-mass spectrometry, atomic absorption spectroscopy, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, and thin layer chromatography. The range of different methods is important due to the destructive nature of some instruments and the number of possible unknown substances that can be found at a scene. Forensic chemists prefer using nondestructive methods first, to preserve evidence and to determine which destructive methods will produce the best results.

Contents

Along with other forensic specialists, forensic chemists commonly testify in court as expert witnesses regarding their findings. Forensic chemists follow a set of standards that have been proposed by various agencies and governing bodies, including the Scientific Working Group on the Analysis of Seized Drugs. In addition to the standard operating procedures proposed by the group, specific agencies have their own standards regarding the quality assurance and quality control of their results and their instruments. To ensure the accuracy of what they are reporting, forensic chemists routinely check and verify that their instruments are working correctly and are still able to detect and measure various quantities of different substances.

Role in investigations

Chemists were able to identify the explosive ANFO at the scene of the Oklahoma City bombing. Oklahomacitybombing-DF-ST-98-01356.jpg
Chemists were able to identify the explosive ANFO at the scene of the Oklahoma City bombing.

Forensic chemists' analysis can provide leads for investigators, and they can confirm or refute their suspicions. The identification of the various substances found at the scene can tell investigators what to look for during their search. During fire investigations, forensic chemists can determine if an accelerant such as gasoline or kerosene was used; if so, this suggests that the fire was intentionally set. [3] Forensic chemists can also narrow down the suspect list to people who would have access to the substance used in a crime. For example, in explosive investigations, the identification of RDX or C-4 would indicate a military connection as those substances are military grade explosives. [4] On the other hand, the identification of TNT would create a wider suspect list, since it is used by demolition companies as well as in the military. [4] During poisoning investigations, the detection of specific poisons can give detectives an idea of what to look for when they are interviewing potential suspects. [5] For example, an investigation that involves ricin would tell investigators to look for ricin's precursors, the seeds of the castor oil plant. [6]

Forensic chemists also help to confirm or refute investigators' suspicions in drug or alcohol cases. The instruments used by forensic chemists can detect minute quantities, and accurate measurement can be important in crimes such as driving under the influence as there are specific blood alcohol content cutoffs where penalties begin or increase. [7] In suspected overdose cases, the quantity of the drug found in the person's system can confirm or rule out overdose as the cause of death. [8]

History

Early history

A bottle of strychnine extract was once easily obtainable in apothecaries. Bottle of extract of nux vomica, London, England, 1794-1930 Wellcome L0058630.jpg
A bottle of strychnine extract was once easily obtainable in apothecaries.

Throughout history, a variety of poisons have been used to commit murder, including arsenic, nightshade, hemlock, strychnine, and curare. [10] Until the early 19th century, there were no methods to accurately determine if a particular chemical was present, and poisoners were rarely punished for their crimes. [11] In 1836, one of the first major contributions to forensic chemistry was introduced by British chemist James Marsh. He created the Marsh test for arsenic detection, which was subsequently used successfully in a murder trial. [12] It was also during this time that forensic toxicology began to be recognized as a distinct field. Mathieu Orfila, the "father of toxicology", made great advancements to the field during the early 19th century. [13] A pioneer in the development of forensic microscopy, Orfila contributed to the advancement of this method for the detection of blood and semen. [13] Orfila was also the first chemist to successfully classify different chemicals into categories such as corrosives, narcotics, and astringents. [11]

The next advancement in the detection of poisons came in 1850 when a valid method for detecting vegetable alkaloids in human tissue was created by chemist Jean Stas. [14] Stas's method was quickly adopted and used successfully in court to convict Count Hippolyte Visart de Bocarmé of murdering his brother-in-law by nicotine poisoning. [14] Stas was able to successfully isolate the alkaloid from the organs of the victim. Stas's protocol was subsequently altered to incorporate tests for caffeine, quinine, morphine, strychnine, atropine, and opium. [15]

The wide range of instrumentation for forensic chemical analysis also began to be developed during this time period. The early 19th century saw the invention of the spectroscope by Joseph von Fraunhofer. [16] In 1859, chemist Robert Bunsen and physicist Gustav Kirchhoff expanded on Fraunhofer's invention. [17] Their experiments with spectroscopy showed that specific substances created a unique spectrum when exposed to specific wavelengths of light. Using spectroscopy, the two scientists were able to identify substances based on their spectrum, providing a method of identification for unknown materials. [17] In 1906 botanist Mikhail Tsvet invented paper chromatography, an early predecessor to thin layer chromatography, and used it to separate and examine the plant proteins that make up chlorophyll. [15] The ability to separate mixtures into their individual components allows forensic chemists to examine the parts of an unknown material against a database of known products. By matching the retention factors for the separated components with known values, materials can be identified. [18]

Modernization

A GC-MS unit with doors open. The gas chromatograph is on the right and the mass spectrometer is on the left. GCMS open.jpg
A GC-MS unit with doors open. The gas chromatograph is on the right and the mass spectrometer is on the left.

Modern forensic chemists rely on numerous instruments to identify unknown materials found at a crime scene. The 20th century saw many advancements in technology that allowed chemists to detect smaller amounts of material more accurately. The first major advancement in this century came during the 1930s with the invention of a spectrometer that could measure the signal produced with infrared (IR) light. Early IR spectrometers used a monochromator and could only measure light absorption in a very narrow wavelength band. It was not until the coupling of an interferometer with an IR spectrometer in 1949 by Peter Fellgett that the complete infrared spectrum could be measured at once. [19] : 202  Fellgett also used the Fourier transform, a mathematical method that can break down a signal into its individual frequencies, to make sense of the enormous amount of data received from the complete infrared analysis of a material. [19] Since then, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) instruments have become critical in the forensic analysis of unknown material because they are nondestructive and extremely quick to use. Spectroscopy was further advanced in 1955 with the invention of the modern atomic absorption (AA) spectrophotometer by Alan Walsh. [20] AA analysis can detect specific elements that make up a sample along with their concentrations, allowing for the easy detection of heavy metals such as arsenic and cadmium. [21]

Advancements in the field of chromatography arrived in 1953 with the invention of the gas chromatograph by Anthony T. James and Archer John Porter Martin, allowing for the separation of volatile liquid mixtures with components which have similar boiling points. Nonvolatile liquid mixtures could be separated with liquid chromatography, but substances with similar retention times could not be resolved until the invention of high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) by Csaba Horváth in 1970. Modern HPLC instruments are capable of detecting and resolving substances whose concentrations are as low as parts per trillion. [22]

One of the most important advancements in forensic chemistry came in 1955 with the invention of gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS) by Fred McLafferty and Roland Gohlke. [23] [24] The coupling of a gas chromatograph with a mass spectrometer allowed for the identification of a wide range of substances. [24] GC-MS analysis is widely considered the "gold standard" for forensic analysis due to its sensitivity and versatility along with its ability to quantify the amount of substance present. [25] The increase in the sensitivity of instrumentation has advanced to the point that minute impurities within compounds can be detected potentially allowing investigators to trace chemicals to a specific batch and lot from a manufacturer. [5]

Methods

Forensic chemists rely on a multitude of instruments to identify unknown substances found at a scene. [26] Different methods can be used to determine the identity of the same substance, and it is up to the examiner to determine which method will produce the best results. Factors that forensic chemists might consider when performing an examination are the length of time a specific instrument will take to examine a substance and the destructive nature of that instrument. They prefer using nondestructive methods first, to preserve the evidence for further examination. [27] Nondestructive techniques can also be used to narrow down the possibilities, making it more likely that the correct method will be used the first time when a destructive method is used. [27]

Spectroscopy

ATR FTIR spectrum for hexane showing percent transmittance (%T) versus wavenumber (cm ). ATR FTIR of Hexane.png
ATR FTIR spectrum for hexane showing percent transmittance (%T) versus wavenumber (cm ).

The two main standalone spectroscopy techniques for forensic chemistry are FTIR and AA spectroscopy. FTIR is a nondestructive process that uses infrared light to identify a substance. The attenuated total reflectance sampling technique eliminates the need for substances to be prepared before analysis. [28] The combination of nondestructiveness and zero preparation makes ATR FTIR analysis a quick and easy first step in the analysis of unknown substances. To facilitate the positive identification of the substance, FTIR instruments are loaded with databases that can be searched for known spectra that match the unknown's spectra. FTIR analysis of mixtures, while not impossible, presents specific difficulties due to the cumulative nature of the response. When analyzing an unknown that contains more than one substance, the resulting spectra will be a combination of the individual spectra of each component. [29] While common mixtures have known spectra on file, novel mixtures can be difficult to resolve, making FTIR an unacceptable means of identification. However, the instrument can be used to determine the general chemical structures present, allowing forensic chemists to determine the best method for analysis with other instruments. For example, a methoxy group will result in a peak between 3,030 and 2,950 wavenumbers (cm−1). [30]

Atomic absorption spectroscopy (AAS) is a destructive technique that is able to determine the elements that make up the analyzed sample. AAS performs this analysis by subjecting the sample to an extremely high heat source, breaking the atomic bonds of the substance, leaving free atoms. Radiation in the form of light is then passed through the sample forcing the atoms to jump to a higher energy state. [31] : 2  Forensic chemists can test for each element by using a corresponding wavelength of light that forces that element's atoms to a higher energy state during the analysis. [31] : 256  For this reason, and due to the destructive nature of this method, AAS is generally used as a confirmatory technique after preliminary tests have indicated the presence of a specific element in the sample. The concentration of the element in the sample is proportional to the amount of light absorbed when compared to a blank sample. [32] AAS is useful in cases of suspected heavy metal poisoning such as with arsenic, lead, mercury, and cadmium. The concentration of the substance in the sample can indicate whether heavy metals were the cause of death. [33]

Chromatography

HPLC readout of an Excedrin tablet. Peaks from left to right are acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine. HPLC readout for APAP, ASA, and caffeine mixture.png
HPLC readout of an Excedrin tablet. Peaks from left to right are acetaminophen, aspirin, and caffeine.

Spectroscopy techniques are useful when the sample being tested is pure, or a very common mixture. When an unknown mixture is being analyzed it must be broken down into its individual parts. Chromatography techniques can be used to break apart mixtures into their components allowing for each part to be analyzed separately.

Thin layer chromatography (TLC) is a quick alternative to more complex chromatography methods. TLC can be used to analyze inks and dyes by extracting the individual components. [18] This can be used to investigate notes or fibers left at the scene since each company's product is slightly different and those differences can be seen with TLC. The only limiting factor with TLC analysis is the necessity for the components to be soluble in whatever solution is used to carry the components up the analysis plate. [18] This solution is called the mobile phase. [18] The forensic chemist can compare unknowns with known standards by looking at the distance each component travelled. [18] This distance, when compared to the starting point, is known as the retention factor (Rf) for each extracted component. [18] If each Rf value matches a known sample, that is an indication of the unknown's identity. [18]

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC) can be used to extract individual components from a mixture dissolved in a solution. HPLC is used for nonvolatile mixtures that would not be suitable for gas chromatography. [34] This is useful in drug analysis where the pharmaceutical is a combination drug since the components would separate, or elute, at different times allowing for the verification of each component. [35] The eluates from the HPLC column are then fed into various detectors that produce a peak on a graph relative to its concentration as it elutes off the column. The most common type of detector is an ultraviolet-visible spectrometer as the most common item of interest tested with HPLC, pharmaceuticals, have UV absorbance. [36]

Gas chromatography (GC) performs the same function as liquid chromatography, but it is used for volatile mixtures. In forensic chemistry, the most common GC instruments use mass spectrometry as their detector. [1] GC-MS can be used in investigations of arson, poisoning, and explosions to determine exactly what was used. In theory, GC-MS instruments can detect substances whose concentrations are in the femtogram (10−15) range. [37] However, in practice, due to signal-to-noise ratios and other limiting factors, such as the age of the individual parts of the instrument, the practical detection limit for GC-MS is in the picogram (10−12) range. [38] GC-MS is also capable of quantifying the substances it detects; chemists can use this information to determine the effect the substance would have on an individual. GC-MS instruments need around 1,000 times more of the substance to quantify the amount than they need simply to detect it; the limit of quantification is typically in the nanogram (10−9) range. [38]

Forensic toxicology

Forensic toxicology is the study of the pharmacodynamics, or what a substance does to the body, and pharmacokinetics, or what the body does to the substance. To accurately determine the effect a particular drug has on the human body, forensic toxicologists must be aware of various levels of drug tolerance that an individual can build up as well as the therapeutic index for various pharmaceuticals. Toxicologists are tasked with determining whether any toxin found in a body was the cause of or contributed to an incident, or whether it was at too low a level to have had an effect. [39] While the determination of the specific toxin can be time-consuming due to the number of different substances that can cause injury or death, certain clues can narrow down the possibilities. For example, carbon monoxide poisoning would result in bright red blood while death from hydrogen sulfide poisoning would cause the brain to have a green hue. [40] [41]

Toxicologists are also aware of the different metabolites that a specific drug could break down into inside the body. For example, a toxicologist can confirm that a person took heroin by the presence in a sample of 6-monoacetylmorphine, which only comes from the breakdown of heroin. [42] The constant creation of new drugs, both legal and illicit, forces toxicologists to keep themselves apprised of new research and methods to test for these novel substances. The stream of new formulations means that a negative test result does not necessarily rule out drugs. To avoid detection, illicit drug manufacturers frequently change the chemicals' structure slightly. These compounds are often not detected by routine toxicology tests and can be masked by the presence of a known compound in the same sample. [43] As new compounds are discovered, known spectra are determined and entered into the databases that can be downloaded and used as reference standards. [44] Laboratories also tend to keep in-house databases for the substances they find locally. [44]

Standards

SWGDRUG analysis categories
Category ACategory BCategory C

Guidelines have been set up by various governing bodies regarding the standards that are followed by practicing forensic scientists. For forensic chemists, the international Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs (SWGDRUG) presents recommendations for the quality assurance and quality control of tested materials. [45] In the identification of unknown samples, protocols have been grouped into three categories based on the probability for false positives. Instruments and protocols in category A are considered the best for uniquely identifying an unknown material, followed by categories B and then C. To ensure the accuracy of identifications SWGDRUG recommends that multiple tests using different instruments be performed on each sample, and that one category A technique and at least one other technique be used. If a category A technique is not available, or the forensic chemist decides not to use one, SWGDRUG recommends that at least three techniques be used, two of which must be from category B. [45] : 14–15  Combination instruments, such as GC-MS, are considered two separate tests as long as the results are compared to known values individually For example, the GC elution times would be compared to known values along with the MS spectra. If both of those match a known substance, no further tests are needed. [45] : 16 

Standards and controls are necessary in the quality control of the various instruments used to test samples. Due to the nature of their work in the legal system, chemists must ensure that their instruments are working accurately. To do this, known controls are tested consecutively with unknown samples. [46] By comparing the readouts of the controls with their known profiles the instrument can be confirmed to have been working properly at the time the unknowns were tested. Standards are also used to determine the instrument's limit of detection and limit of quantification for various common substances. [47] Calculated quantities must be above the limit of detection to be confirmed as present and above the limit of quantification to be quantified. [47] If the value is below the limit the value is not considered reliable. [47]

Testimony

The standardized procedures for testimony by forensic chemists are provided by the various agencies that employ the scientists as well as SWGDRUG. Forensic chemists are ethically bound to present testimony in a neutral manner and to be open to reconsidering their statements if new information is found. [45] : 3  Chemists should also limit their testimony to areas they have been qualified in regardless of questions during direct or cross-examination. [45] : 27 

Individuals called to testify must be able to relay scientific information and processes in a manner that lay individuals can understand. [48] By being qualified as an expert, chemists are allowed to give their opinions on the evidence as opposed to just stating the facts. This can lead to competing opinions from experts hired by the opposing side. [48] Ethical guidelines for forensic chemists require that testimony be given in an objective manner, regardless of what side the expert is testifying for. [49] Forensic experts that are called to testify are expected to work with the lawyer who issued the summons and to assist in their understanding of the material they will be asking questions about. [49]

Education

Forensic chemistry positions require a bachelor's degree or similar in a natural or physical science, as well as laboratory experience in general, organic, and analytical chemistry. Once in the position, individuals are trained in protocols performed at that specific lab until they are proven competent to perform all experiments without supervision. Practicing chemists in the field are expected to complete continuing education to maintain their proficiency. [45] : 4–6 

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Analytical chemistry</span> Study of the separation, identification, and quantification of matter

Analytical chemistry studies and uses instruments and methods to separate, identify, and quantify matter. In practice, separation, identification or quantification may constitute the entire analysis or be combined with another method. Separation isolates analytes. Qualitative analysis identifies analytes, while quantitative analysis determines the numerical amount or concentration.

In chemical analysis, chromatography is a laboratory technique for the separation of a mixture into its components. The mixture is dissolved in a fluid solvent called the mobile phase, which carries it through a system on which a material called the stationary phase is fixed. Because the different constituents of the mixture tend to have different affinities for the stationary phase and are retained for different lengths of time depending on their interactions with its surface sites, the constituents travel at different apparent velocities in the mobile fluid, causing them to separate. The separation is based on the differential partitioning between the mobile and the stationary phases. Subtle differences in a compound's partition coefficient result in differential retention on the stationary phase and thus affect the separation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry</span> Type of mass spectrometry that uses an inductively coupled plasma to ionize the sample

Inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry (ICP-MS) is a type of mass spectrometry that uses an inductively coupled plasma to ionize the sample. It atomizes the sample and creates atomic and small polyatomic ions, which are then detected. It is known and used for its ability to detect metals and several non-metals in liquid samples at very low concentrations. It can detect different isotopes of the same element, which makes it a versatile tool in isotopic labeling.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Clinical chemistry</span> Area of clinical pathology that is generally concerned with analysis of bodily fluids

Clinical chemistry is a division in medical laboratory sciences focusing on qualitative tests of important compounds, referred to as analytes or markers, in bodily fluids and tissues using analytical techniques and specialized instruments. This interdisciplinary field includes knowledge from medicine, biology, chemistry, biomedical engineering, informatics, and an applied form of biochemistry.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">High-performance liquid chromatography</span> Technique in analytical chemistry

High-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC), formerly referred to as high-pressure liquid chromatography, is a technique in analytical chemistry used to separate, identify, and quantify specific components in mixtures. The mixtures can originate from food, chemicals, pharmaceuticals, biological, environmental and agriculture, etc., which have been dissolved into liquid solutions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Electron ionization</span> Ionization technique

Electron ionization is an ionization method in which energetic electrons interact with solid or gas phase atoms or molecules to produce ions. EI was one of the first ionization techniques developed for mass spectrometry. However, this method is still a popular ionization technique. This technique is considered a hard ionization method, since it uses highly energetic electrons to produce ions. This leads to extensive fragmentation, which can be helpful for structure determination of unknown compounds. EI is the most useful for organic compounds which have a molecular weight below 600 amu. Also, several other thermally stable and volatile compounds in solid, liquid and gas states can be detected with the use of this technique when coupled with various separation methods.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gas chromatography</span> Type of chromatography

Gas chromatography (GC) is a common type of chromatography used in analytical chemistry for separating and analyzing compounds that can be vaporized without decomposition. Typical uses of GC include testing the purity of a particular substance, or separating the different components of a mixture. In preparative chromatography, GC can be used to prepare pure compounds from a mixture.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry</span> Analytical method

Gas chromatography–mass spectrometry (GC–MS) is an analytical method that combines the features of gas-chromatography and mass spectrometry to identify different substances within a test sample. Applications of GC–MS include drug detection, fire investigation, environmental analysis, explosives investigation, food and flavor analysis, and identification of unknown samples, including that of material samples obtained from planet Mars during probe missions as early as the 1970s. GC–MS can also be used in airport security to detect substances in luggage or on human beings. Additionally, it can identify trace elements in materials that were previously thought to have disintegrated beyond identification. Like liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry, it allows analysis and detection even of tiny amounts of a substance.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Metabolomics</span> Scientific study of chemical processes involving metabolites

Metabolomics is the scientific study of chemical processes involving metabolites, the small molecule substrates, intermediates, and products of cell metabolism. Specifically, metabolomics is the "systematic study of the unique chemical fingerprints that specific cellular processes leave behind", the study of their small-molecule metabolite profiles. The metabolome represents the complete set of metabolites in a biological cell, tissue, organ, or organism, which are the end products of cellular processes. Messenger RNA (mRNA), gene expression data, and proteomic analyses reveal the set of gene products being produced in the cell, data that represents one aspect of cellular function. Conversely, metabolic profiling can give an instantaneous snapshot of the physiology of that cell, and thus, metabolomics provides a direct "functional readout of the physiological state" of an organism. There are indeed quantifiable correlations between the metabolome and the other cellular ensembles, which can be used to predict metabolite abundances in biological samples from, for example mRNA abundances. One of the ultimate challenges of systems biology is to integrate metabolomics with all other -omics information to provide a better understanding of cellular biology.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Forensic toxicology</span> Use of toxicology for investigations

Forensic toxicology is a multidisciplinary field that combines the principles of toxicology with expertise in disciplines such as analytical chemistry, pharmacology and clinical chemistry to aid medical or legal investigation of death, poisoning, and drug use. The paramount focus for forensic toxicology is not the legal implications of the toxicological investigation or the methodologies employed, but rather the acquisition and accurate interpretation of results. Toxicological analyses can encompass a wide array of samples. In the course of an investigation, a forensic toxicologist must consider the context of an investigation, in particular any physical symptoms recorded, and any evidence collected at a crime scene that may narrow the search, such as pill bottles, powders, trace residue, and any available chemicals. Armed with this contextual information and samples to examine, the forensic toxicologist is tasked with identifying the specific toxic substances present, quantifying their concentrations, and assessing their likely impact on the individual involved.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry</span> Analytical chemistry technique

Liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry (LC–MS) is an analytical chemistry technique that combines the physical separation capabilities of liquid chromatography with the mass analysis capabilities of mass spectrometry (MS). Coupled chromatography – MS systems are popular in chemical analysis because the individual capabilities of each technique are enhanced synergistically. While liquid chromatography separates mixtures with multiple components, mass spectrometry provides spectral information that may help to identify each separated component. MS is not only sensitive, but provides selective detection, relieving the need for complete chromatographic separation. LC–MS is also appropriate for metabolomics because of its good coverage of a wide range of chemicals. This tandem technique can be used to analyze biochemical, organic, and inorganic compounds commonly found in complex samples of environmental and biological origin. Therefore, LC–MS may be applied in a wide range of sectors including biotechnology, environment monitoring, food processing, and pharmaceutical, agrochemical, and cosmetic industries. Since the early 2000s, LC–MS has also begun to be used in clinical applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Atmospheric-pressure chemical ionization</span> Ionization method

Atmospheric pressure chemical ionization (APCI) is an ionization method used in mass spectrometry which utilizes gas-phase ion-molecule reactions at atmospheric pressure (105 Pa), commonly coupled with high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). APCI is a soft ionization method similar to chemical ionization where primary ions are produced on a solvent spray. The main usage of APCI is for polar and relatively less polar thermally stable compounds with molecular weight less than 1500 Da. The application of APCI with HPLC has gained a large popularity in trace analysis detection such as steroids, pesticides and also in pharmacology for drug metabolites.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Thermospray</span>

Thermospray is a soft ionization source by which a solvent flow of liquid sample passes through a very thin heated column to become a spray of fine liquid droplets. As a form of atmospheric pressure ionization in mass spectrometry these droplets are then ionized via a low-current discharge electrode to create a solvent ion plasma. A repeller then directs these charged particles through the skimmer and acceleration region to introduce the aerosolized sample to a mass spectrometer. It is particularly useful in liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS).

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Two-dimensional chromatography</span>

Two-dimensional chromatography is a type of chromatographic technique in which the injected sample is separated by passing through two different separation stages. Two different chromatographic columns are connected in sequence, and the effluent from the first system is transferred onto the second column. Typically the second column has a different separation mechanism, so that bands that are poorly resolved from the first column may be completely separated in the second column. Alternately, the two columns might run at different temperatures. During the second stage of separation the rate at which the separation occurs must be faster than the first stage, since there is still only a single detector. The plane surface is amenable to sequential development in two directions using two different solvents.

A monolithic HPLC column, or monolithic column, is a column used in high-performance liquid chromatography (HPLC). The internal structure of the monolithic column is created in such a way that many channels form inside the column. The material inside the column which separates the channels can be porous and functionalized. In contrast, most HPLC configurations use particulate packed columns; in these configurations, tiny beads of an inert substance, typically a modified silica, are used inside the column. Monolithic columns can be broken down into two categories, silica-based and polymer-based monoliths. Silica-based monoliths are known for their efficiency in separating smaller molecules while, polymer-based are known for separating large protein molecules.

Bioanalysis is a sub-discipline of analytical chemistry covering the quantitative measurement of xenobiotics and biotics in biological systems.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Direct electron ionization liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry interface</span>

A direct electron ionization liquid chromatography–mass spectrometry interface is a technique for coupling liquid chromatography and mass spectrometry (LC-MS) based on the direct introduction of the liquid effluent into an electron ionization (EI) source. Library searchable mass spectra are generated. Gas-phase EI has many applications for the detection of HPLC amenable compounds showing minimal adverse matrix effects. The direct-EI LC-MS interface provides access to well-characterized electron ionization data for a variety of LC applications and readily interpretable spectra from electronic libraries for environmental, food safety, pharmaceutical, biomedical, and other applications.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Instrumental chemistry</span> Study of analytes using scientific instruments

Instrumental analysis is a field of analytical chemistry that investigates analytes using scientific instruments.

Post-mortem chemistry, also called necrochemistry or death chemistry, is a subdiscipline of chemistry in which the chemical structures, reactions, processes and parameters of a dead organism is investigated. Post-mortem chemistry plays a significant role in forensic pathology. Biochemical analyses of vitreous humor, cerebrospinal fluid, blood and urine is important in determining the cause of death or in elucidating forensic cases.

References

  1. 1 2 "A Simplified Guide to Forensic Drug Chemistry" (PDF). National Forensic Science Technology Center. Archived from the original (PDF) on March 21, 2016. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  2. ↑ Browne, Malcolm W. (April 21, 1995). "Terror in Oklahoma: the Science; Experts Search for Debris to Link Bomb to a Suspect". The New York Times. Retrieved October 28, 2015.
  3. ↑ Stern, Wal (November 1995). "Modern Methods of Accelerant Analysis". Southeast Asia Fire and Security. Retrieved October 28, 2015– via T.C. Forensic.
  4. 1 2 "Common Explosives". The National Counterterrorism Center. Archived from the original on January 13, 2016. Retrieved October 28, 2015.
  5. 1 2 Halford, Bethany (February 6, 2012). "Tracing a Threat". Chemical & Engineering News. 90 (6): 10–15. doi:10.1021/cen-09006-cover . Retrieved December 6, 2016.
  6. ↑ Goldstein, Joseph (June 7, 2013). "Woman from Texas is Charged in Ricin Case". The New York Times. Retrieved December 6, 2016.
  7. ↑ "Legal BAC Limits Data by Country". World Health Organization. Retrieved October 30, 2015.
  8. ↑ "Toxicology Screen". The New York Times. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
  9. ↑ Wetherell, Donald G. (2016). Wildlife, Land, and People: a Century of Change in Prairie Canada. McGill-Queen's Press. ISBN   9780773599895 – via Google Books.
  10. ↑ Cellania, Miss (November 3, 2009). "5 Classic Poisons and the People who Used Them". Mental Floss. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  11. 1 2 Pizzi, Richard A. (September 2004). "Pointing to Poison" (PDF). Today's Chemist at Work: 43–45. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  12. ↑ Watson, Stephanie (June 9, 2008). "How Forensic Lab Techniques Work". How Stuff Works. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  13. 1 2 "Mathieu Joseph Bonaventure Orfila (1787–1853)". National Library of Medicine. June 5, 2014. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  14. 1 2 Wennig, Robert (April 2009). "Back to the Roots of Modern Analytical Toxicology: Jean Servais Stas and the Bocarmé Murder Case" (PDF). Drug Testing and Analysis. 1 (4): 153–155. doi:10.1002/dta.32. PMID   20355192. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2017-08-08. Retrieved 2015-09-25.
  15. 1 2 "Technologies". National Library of Medicine. June 5, 2014. Retrieved September 25, 2015.
  16. ↑ "Fraunhofer, Joseph von". The Encyclopedia Americana. Vol. 12. The Encyclopedia American Corporation. 1919. p.  28.
  17. 1 2 "Spectroscopy and the Birth of Astrophysics". American Institute of Physics. Center for History of Physics. Archived from the original on September 7, 2015. Retrieved September 25, 2015.
  18. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Carlysle, Felicity (2011-07-26). "TLC the Forensic Way". theGIST. Glasgow Insight Into Science & Technology. Archived from the original on July 30, 2016. Retrieved October 10, 2015.
  19. 1 2 Derrick, Michele R.; Stulik, Dusan; Landry, James M. "Infrared Spectroscopy in Conservation Science" (PDF). The Getty Conservation Institute. Retrieved September 26, 2015.
  20. ↑ Willis, J B (1993). "The Birth of the Atomic Absorption Spectrometer and its Early Applications in Clinical Chemistry" (PDF). Clinical Chemistry. 39 (1): 155–160. doi:10.1093/clinchem/39.1.155. PMID   8419043 . Retrieved October 6, 2015.
  21. ↑ Willis, J B (May 1962). "Determination of Lead and Other Heavy Metals in Urine by Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy". Analytical Chemistry. 34 (6): 614–617. doi:10.1021/ac60186a008.
  22. ↑ Forbes, Patricia, ed. (2015). Monitoring of Air Pollutants: Sampling, Sample Preparation and Analytical Techniques. Comprehensive Analytical Chemistry. Vol. 70. Elsevier. p. 274. ISBN   9780444635532 – via Google Books.
  23. ↑ Jones, Mark. "Gas Chromatography-Mass Spectrometry". American Chemical Society. Retrieved 19 Nov 2019.
  24. 1 2 Gohlke, Roland S.; McLafferty, Fred W. (May 1993). "Early Gas Chromatography/Mass Spectrometry". Journal of the American Society for Mass Spectrometry. 4 (5): 367–371. doi: 10.1016/1044-0305(93)85001-e . PMID   24234933.
  25. ↑ Kapur, BM (1993). "Drug-testing Methods and Clinical Interpretations of Test Results". Bulletin on Narcotics. 45 (2): 115–154. PMID   7920539 . Retrieved September 27, 2015.
  26. ↑ Gaensslen, R.E.; Kubic, Thomas A.; Desio, Peter J.; Lee, Henry C. (December 1985). "Instrumentation and Analytical Methodology in Forensic Science". Journal of Chemical Education. 62 (12): 1058–1060. Bibcode:1985JChEd..62.1058G. doi: 10.1021/ed062p1058 .
  27. 1 2 "Quality Assurance Guide for the Forensic Analysis of Ignitable Liquids". Forensic Science Communications. 8 (2). April 2006. Archived from the original on May 29, 2016. Retrieved September 24, 2015.
  28. ↑ Angelos, Sanford; Garry, Mike (August 5, 2011). "Seized Drug Analysis Using FT-IR and Mixture Searching For More Effective Identification". Forensic Magazine. Advantage Business Media. Retrieved October 6, 2015.
  29. ↑ Izzia, Federico; Nunn, Simon; Bradley, Michael (August 1, 2008). "Analysis of Mixtures by FT-IR: Spatial and Spectral Separation of Complex Samples". Spectroscopy Online. Special Issues-08-01-2008. Retrieved October 6, 2015.
  30. ↑ Socrates, George (2004). Infrared and Raman Characteristic Group Frequencies: Tables and Charts (Third ed.). John Wiley & Sons. p. 55. ISBN   9780470093078 – via Google Books.
  31. 1 2 Cantle, John Edward, ed. (1986). Atomic Absorption Spectrometry. Techniques and Instrumentation in Analytical Chemistry. Vol. 5. Elsevier. ISBN   9780444420152 – via Google Books.
  32. ↑ Schiller, Matt. "Atomic Absorption Spectroscopy (AAS)". Easy Chem. Retrieved October 7, 2015.
  33. ↑ Baldwin, Dianne R; Marshall, William J (1999). "Heavy Metal Poisoning and its Laboratory Investigation". Annals of Clinical Biochemistry. 36 (3): 267–300. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.528.7546 . doi:10.1177/000456329903600301. PMID   10376071. S2CID   26671861.
  34. ↑ Picó, Yolanda, ed. (2012). Chemical Analysis of Food: Techniques and Applications. Elsevier. p. 501. ISBN   9780123848628 – via Google Books.
  35. ↑ Nikolin, B; Imamović, B; Medanhodzić-Vuk, S; Sober, M (May 2004). "High Performance Liquid Chromatography in Pharmaceutical Analyses". Bosnian Journal of Basic Medical Sciences. 4 (2): 5–9. doi: 10.17305/bjbms.2004.3405 . PMC   7250120 . PMID   15629016.
  36. ↑ Dong, Michael W. (2016). Modern HPLC for Practicing Scientists. John Wiley & Sons. ISBN   9780471727897 – via Google Books.
  37. ↑ Fialkov, Alexander; Steiner, Urs; Lehotay, Steven; Amirav, Aviv (January 15, 2007). "Sensitivity and Noise in GC-MS: Achieving Low Limits of Detection for Difficult Analytes". International Journal of Mass Spectrometry. 260 (1): 31–48. Bibcode:2007IJMSp.260...31F. doi:10.1016/j.ijms.2006.07.002.
  38. 1 2 Smith, Michael L.; Vorce, Shawn P.; Holler, Justin M.; Shimomura, Eric; Magluilo, Joe; Jacobs, Aaron J.; Huestis, Marilyn A. (June 2007). "Modern Instrumental Methods in Forensic Toxicology". Journal of Analytical Toxicology. 31 (5): 237–253. doi:10.1093/jat/31.5.237. PMC   2745311 . PMID   17579968.
  39. ↑ "Forensic Toxicology". National Institute of Justice. December 23, 2014. Retrieved October 12, 2015.
  40. ↑ Foley, Katherine (August 16, 2015). "The Science Behind Forensic Toxicology". Quartz. Retrieved October 12, 2015.
  41. ↑ Park, Seong Hwan; Zhang, Yong; Hwang, Juck-Joon (May 30, 2009). "Discolouration of the Brain as the only Remarkable Autopsy Finding in Hydrogen Sulphide Poisoning". Forensic Science International. 187 (1–3): e19–e21. doi:10.1016/j.forsciint.2009.02.002. PMID   19297107 . Retrieved October 12, 2015.
  42. ↑ von Euler, M; Villén, T; Svensson, JO; Ståhle, L (October 2003). "Interpretation of the Presence of 6-monoacetylmorphine in the Absence of Morphine-3-glucuronide in Urine Samples: Evidence of Heroin Abuse". Therapeutic Drug Monitoring. 25 (5): 645–648. doi:10.1097/00007691-200310000-00015. PMID   14508389. S2CID   22267781.
  43. ↑ Melinek, Jude (September 2016). "How Designer Drugs and the Opioid Epidemic Affect Modern Forensic Practice". Forensic Magazine: 18–19. Archived from the original on October 1, 2016. Retrieved September 29, 2016.
  44. 1 2 Stout, Peter; Moore, Katherine; Grabenauer, Megan; Ropero-Miller, Jeri (March 2013). Expansion of a Cheminformatic Database of Spectral Data for Forensic Chemists and Toxicologists (PDF) (Report). U.S. Department of Justice. p. 2. Retrieved December 5, 2016.
  45. 1 2 3 4 5 6 "Scientific Working Group for the Analysis of Seized Drugs (SWGDRUG) Recommendations" (PDF). 7.1. June 9, 2016. Retrieved January 4, 2017.
  46. ↑ "Validation Guidelines for Laboratories Performing Forensic Analysis of Chemical Terrorism". Forensic Science Communications. 7 (2). April 2005. Archived from the original on March 4, 2016. Retrieved October 16, 2015.
  47. 1 2 3 Armbruster, David A.; Pry, Terry (August 2008). "Limit of Blank, Limit of Detection and Limit of Quantitation". The Clinical Biochemist Reviews. 29 (Supplement 1) (Suppl 1): S49–S52. PMC   2556583 . PMID   18852857.
  48. 1 2 Melton, Lisa (November 2007). "Courtroom chemistry" (PDF). Chemistry World. Retrieved October 13, 2016.
  49. 1 2 Wells, Doris (March 26, 2012). "In Brief: Law 101: Legal Guide for the Forensic Expert". National Institute of Justice. Retrieved October 13, 2016.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.