Cowboy Spring Formation

Last updated

Cowboy Spring Formation
Stratigraphic range: late Cretaceous
Type Formation
Underlies Timberlake Formation
Overlies Mojado Formation
ThicknessOver 1,000 feet (300 m)
Lithology
Primary Limestone conglomerate
Other Sandstone, shale, claystone, tuff
Location
Coordinates 31°36′31″N108°38′10″W / 31.6085°N 108.6362°W / 31.6085; -108.6362
Region New Mexico
Country United States
Type section
Named forCowboy Spring
Named byZeller and Alper
Year defined1965
Usa edcp relief location map.png
Lightgreen pog.svg
Cowboy Spring Formation (the United States)
USA New Mexico relief location map.svg
Lightgreen pog.svg
Cowboy Spring Formation (New Mexico)

The Cowboy Spring Formation is a geologic formation in southwestern New Mexico and southeastern Arizona. It preserves fossils dating back to the late Cretaceous period. [1] [2]

Contents

Description

The formation is primarily limestone cobble conglomerate. The massive conglomerate beds are separated by thinner beds of sandstone, shale, claystone, and tuff. The clasts in the conglomerate are of Cretaceous age and contain the foraminiferan Orbitolina and other common Cretaceous fossils. These are embedded in a red arkosic matrix. The sandstones are also mostly red and arkosic and the shale is mostly bright red. The formation interfingers with the underlying Mojado Formation, is overlain with angular unconformity by the Timberlake Formation, and has a total thickness of at least 1,000 feet (300 m). [1]

A single latite tuff bed some 20 feet (6.1 m) is exposed in the formation. [1]

The formation was deposited in the Little Hat Top basin, which was produced by Laramide deformation on the southwest flank of the Hidalgo uplift. [3]

History of investigation

The formation was first named by Zeller and Alper in 1965 for a single outcrop in the Animas Mountains. [1] By 1970, it had been traced into southeastern Arizona [2] Elston and Erb recommended merging the formation with the overlying Timberlake Formation due to lack of a clear lithological distinction, [4] but this has not been universally accepted. [5]

Footnotes

References