Cuprospinel

Last updated
Cuprospinel
General
Category Oxide mineral
Spinel group
Formula
(repeating unit)		CuFe2O4 or (Cu,Mg)Fe2O4
Strunz classification 4.BB.05
Crystal system Isometric
Crystal class Hexoctahedral (m3m)
H-M symbol: (4/m 3 2/m)
Space group Cubic
Space group: Fd3m
Identification
Formula mass 239.23 g/mol
ColorBlack, gray in reflected light
Crystal habit Irregular grains, laminae intergrown with hematite
Mohs scale hardness6.5
Luster Metallic
Streak Black
Diaphaneity Opaque
Specific gravity 5 - 5.2
Optical propertiesIsotropic
Refractive index n = 1.8
References [1] [2] [3]
Cuprospinel
Names
IUPAC name
Copper(2+) bis[oxido(oxo)iron
Other names
Copper iron oxide , cuprospinel, Copper diiron tetraoxide, Copper ferrite
Identifiers
ChemSpider
PubChem CID
  • InChI=1S/Cu.2Fe.4O/q+2;;;;;2*-1
Except where otherwise noted, data are given for materials in their standard state (at 25 °C [77 °F], 100 kPa).
X mark.svgN (what is  Yes check.svgYX mark.svgN ?)

Cuprospinel is a mineral. Cuprospinel is an inverse spinel with the chemical formula CuFe2O4, where copper substitutes some of the iron cations in the structure. [10] [11] Its structure is similar to that of magnetite, Fe3O4, yet with slightly different chemical and physical properties due to the presence of copper.

Contents

The type locality of cuprospinel is Baie Verte, Newfoundland, Canada, [2] [1] where the mineral was found in an exposed ore dump. The mineral was first characterized by Ernest Henry Nickel, a mineralogist with the Department of Energy, Mines and Resources in Australia, in 1973. [12] [13] Cuprospinel is also found in other places, for example, in Hubei province, China [14] and at Tolbachik volcano in Kamchatka, Russia. [15]

Structural properties

Cuprospinel, like many other spinels has the general formula AB2O4. Yet, cuprospinel is an inverse spinel in that its A element, in this case copper (Cu2+), only occupies octahedral sites in the structure and the B element, iron (Fe2+ and Fe3+), is split between the octahedral and tetrahedral sites in the structure. [16] [17] The Fe2+ species will occupy some of the octahedral sites and there will only be Fe3+ at the tetrahedral sites. [16] [17] Cuprospinel adopts both cubic and tetragonal phases at room temperature, yet as temperature is elevated the cubic form is most stable. [10] [17]

Magnetic properties

CuFe2O4 nanoparticles have been characterized as a superparamagnetic material with saturated magnetization of Ms = 49 emu g−1, [18] remnant magnetization (Mr = 11.66 emu g−1) and coercivity (Hc = 63.1 mT). [19] The magnetic properties of CuFe2O4 are correlated with the size of particles. Particularly, the decreasing in saturated magnetization and remanence correspond to the decreasing in the size of CuFe2O4 particles, whereas the coercivity increases. [20]

Solid phase synthesis

Spinel CuFe2O4 can be synthesized by solid phase synthesis at high temperature. In a particular procedure for this type of synthesis, the stoichiometric mixture of Cu(CH3COO)2· and FeC2O2 is ground together and stirred in a solvent. After evaporation of the solvent, the resulting powder is heated in a furnace at constant temperature around 900 °C in normal air-atmosphere environment. Then the resulting product is slowly cooled to room temperature in order to obtain the desired stable spinel structure. [20]

Hydrothermal treatment of a precipitate in TEG

A method combining a first precipitation step at room temperature in triethylene glycol (TEG), a viscous and highly hygroscopic liquid with an elevated boiling point, 285 °C (545 °F; 558 K), followed by a thermal treatment at elevated temperature is an effective way to synthesize spinel oxide, especially copper iron oxide. Typically, NaOH is first added dropwise to a solution of Fe3+ (Fe(NO3)3 or Fe(acac)3) and Cu2+ (Cu(NO3)2 or CuCl2) in triethylene glycol at room temperature with constant stirring until a reddish-black precipitate completely form. The resulting viscous suspension is then placed in an ultrasonic bath to be properly dispersed, followed by heating in a furnace at high temperature[ clarification needed : imprecise terms and very confusing text]. The final product is then washed in diethyl ether, ethyl acetate, ethanol and deionized water [ clarification needed : unclear!], and then dried under vacuum to obtain oxide particles. [21] [22] [23]

Uses

Cuprospinel is used in various industrial processes as a catalyst. An example is the water–gas shift reaction: [17]

H2O(v) + CO(g) → CO2(g) + H2(g)

This reaction is particularly important for hydrogen production and enrichment.

The interest of cuprospinel arises in that magnetite is a widely used catalyst for many industrial chemical reactions, such as the Fischer–Tropsch process, the Haber–Bosch process and the water-gas shift reaction. It has been shown that doping magnetite with other elements gives it different chemical and physical properties; these different properties sometimes allow the catalyst to work more efficiently. As such, cuprospinel is essentially magnetite doped with copper and this enhances magnetite's water gas shift properties as a heterogeneous catalyst. [24] [25]

Recyclable catalyst for organic reactions

Recent years, various research towards the heterogeneous catalytic ability of CuFe2O4 in organic synthesis have been published ranging from traditional reactions to modern organometallic transformation. [26] [27] By taking advantages of magnetic nature, the catalyst can be separated simply by external magnetism, which can overcome the difficulty to separate nano-scaled metal catalyst from the reaction mixture. Particularly, only by applying magnetic bar at the outer vessel, the catalyst can easily be held at the edge of container while removing solution and washing particles. [18] The obtained particles can be readily used for the next catalyst cycles. Moreover, the catalytic site can be exploited in either cooper or iron center because of the large-surface area of nanoparticles, leading to wide scope to apply this material in various types of reactions. [22] [26]

Catalyst for multi-component reaction (MCR)

Nano CuFe2O4 can be utilized as a catalyst in a one-pot synthesis of fluorine containing spirohexahydro pyrimidine derivatives. It has also been observed that the catalyst can be reused five times without significant loss in catalytic activity after each runs. In the reaction, iron plays a vital role in the coordination with the carbonyl group in order to increase the electrophilic property, which can facilitate the reaction conditions and increase the reaction rate. [22]

One-pot synthesis of fluorine containing spirohexahydropyrimidine derivatives. Adapted from Dandia, Jain & Sharma 2013. Catalyst CuFe2O4 for Multicomponent Reaction 1.png
One-pot synthesis of fluorine containing spirohexahydropyrimidine derivatives. Adapted from Dandia, Jain & Sharma 2013.

Another example for MCR utilizing CuFe2O4 was published in a research towards the A3 coupling of aldehydes, amine with phenylacetylene to give the corresponding propargylamines. The catalyst can be reused three times without remarkable reduce in reaction yield. [28]

A3 coupling of aldehydes, amine with phenylacetylene. Adapted from Tamaddon & Amirpoor 2013. Catalyst CuFe2O4 for Multicomponent Reaction 2.png
A3 coupling of aldehydes, amine with phenylacetylene. Adapted from Tamaddon & Amirpoor 2013.

Catalyst for C-O cross coupling

Pallapothula and coworkers demonstrated CuFe2O4 is an efficient catalyst for C-O cross-coupling between phenols and aryl halides. The catalyst exhibited superior activity in comparison with other nanoparticles oxides such as Co3O4, SnO2, Sb2O3. [30] Moreover, the catalyst can benefit in applying C-O cross-coupling on alkyl alcohols, leading to widening scope for the transformation. [31]

C-O cross-coupling between phenols and aryl halides. Adapted from Yang et al. 2013. Catalyst CuFe2O4 for C-O cross coupling.png
C-O cross-coupling between phenols and aryl halides. Adapted from Yang et al. 2013.

Catalyst for C-H activation

Nano CuFe2O4 catalyst was demonstrated its activity for C-H activation in Mannich type reaction. In the mechanistic study, the copper play a significant role in both generate radical from TBHP and activate C-H from substituted alkyne. In this reaction, iron center was considered as a magnetic source and this hypothesis was proved by the experiment, in which magnetic Fe3O4 had been used but failed to catalyze reaction in the absence of copper center. [21]

C-H activation in Mannich type reaction. Adapted from Nguyen et al. 2014. CuFe2O4 Catalyst for C-H activation.png
C-H activation in Mannich type reaction. Adapted from Nguyen et al. 2014.

Other reactions

CuFe2O4 can also be applied for C-C cleavage α-arylation between acetylacetone with iodobenzene. The phenylacetone product was obtained with excellent yield at 99% and 95% selectivity observed for principal product compared to 3-phenyl-2,4-pentanedione as the byproduct. The XRD results were observed that crystal structure of catalyst remained unchanged after the sixth run while catalytic activity slightly decreases at 97% conversion in the final run. In this reaction, the mechanistic study showed the catalytic cycle started from CuII to CuI and then oxidized to CuII by aryl iodine. [18]

Arylation between acetylacetone with iodobenzene. Adapted from Nguyen et al. 2014. CuFe2O4 catalyst for arylation.png
Arylation between acetylacetone with iodobenzene. Adapted from Nguyen et al. 2014.

The role of copper has been further emphasized in the coupling reaction of ortho-arylated phenols and dialkylformamides. It was observed that there was a single-electron oxidative addition of copperII to copperIII through a radical step, then transformed back to copperI by reductive elimination in the presence of either oxygen or peroxide. Catalyst can be reused 9 times without significant loss in catalytic activities. [32]

Coupling reaction of ortho-arylated phenols and dialkylformamides. Adapted from Nguyen et al. 2017. CuFe2O4 catalyst for coupling reaction of ortho-arylated phenols and dialkylformamides.png
Coupling reaction of ortho-arylated phenols and dialkylformamides. Adapted from Nguyen et al. 2017.

Synergistic effect of catalytic activity

Notably, synergistic effect was demonstrated for the case of CuFe2O4 in Sonogashira reaction. Both Fe and Cu center contribute to catalytic activity of the transformation between aryl halide and substituted alkynes. The product was obtained with 70% yield in the presence of Nano CuFe2O4, while only 25% yield and <1% yield observed when using CuO and Fe3O4 respectively. [33]

Transformation between aryl halide and substituted alkynes CuFe2O4 catalyst Sonogashira reaction.png
Transformation between aryl halide and substituted alkynes

Mechanism of action of the catalyst

As can be noted in the examples shown above, many molecules involved in the reactions catalyzed by CuFe2O4 have a carbonyl group (C=O) or amine group (-NH2), which have electron lone pairs. These lone pairs are used to be adsorbed at the surface of the empty 3d orbital in the catalyst, and thus activate the molecules for the intended reactions. Other molecules containing functional groups with electron lone pairs such as nitro (NO2) and thiol (RS-H) also are activated by the catalyst. Species forming containing a single unpaired electron such as TEMPO or peroxymonosulphate are also adsorbed and activated to promote some organic reactions. [27]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Maghemite</span> Iron oxide with a spinel ferrite structure

Maghemite (Fe2O3, γ-Fe2O3) is a member of the family of iron oxides. It has the same spinel ferrite structure as magnetite and is also ferrimagnetic. It is sometimes spelled as "maghaemite".

The Suzuki reaction is an organic reaction, classified as a cross-coupling reaction, where the coupling partners are a boronic acid and an organohalide and the catalyst is a palladium(0) complex. It was first published in 1979 by Akira Suzuki, and he shared the 2010 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Richard F. Heck and Ei-ichi Negishi for their contribution to the discovery and development of palladium-catalyzed cross-couplings in organic synthesis. This reaction is also known as the Suzuki–Miyaura reaction or simply as the Suzuki coupling. It is widely used to synthesize polyolefins, styrenes, and substituted biphenyls. Several reviews have been published describing advancements and the development of the Suzuki reaction. The general scheme for the Suzuki reaction is shown below, where a carbon-carbon single bond is formed by coupling a halide (R1-X) with an organoboron species (R2-BY2) using a palladium catalyst and a base.

The Sonogashira reaction is a cross-coupling reaction used in organic synthesis to form carbon–carbon bonds. It employs a palladium catalyst as well as copper co-catalyst to form a carbon–carbon bond between a terminal alkyne and an aryl or vinyl halide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iron(II,III) oxide</span> Chemical compound

Iron(II,III) oxide, or black iron oxide, is the chemical compound with formula Fe3O4. It occurs in nature as the mineral magnetite. It is one of a number of iron oxides, the others being iron(II) oxide (FeO), which is rare, and iron(III) oxide (Fe2O3) which also occurs naturally as the mineral hematite. It contains both Fe2+ and Fe3+ ions and is sometimes formulated as FeO ∙ Fe2O3. This iron oxide is encountered in the laboratory as a black powder. It exhibits permanent magnetism and is ferrimagnetic, but is sometimes incorrectly described as ferromagnetic. Its most extensive use is as a black pigment (see: Mars Black). For this purpose, it is synthesized rather than being extracted from the naturally occurring mineral as the particle size and shape can be varied by the method of production.

The Sandmeyer reaction is a chemical reaction used to synthesize aryl halides from aryl diazonium salts using copper salts as reagents or catalysts. It is an example of a radical-nucleophilic aromatic substitution. The Sandmeyer reaction provides a method through which one can perform unique transformations on benzene, such as halogenation, cyanation, trifluoromethylation, and hydroxylation.

The Ullmann condensation or Ullmann-type reaction is the copper-promoted conversion of aryl halides to aryl ethers, aryl thioethers, aryl nitriles, and aryl amines. These reactions are examples of cross-coupling reactions.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ferrite (magnet)</span> Ferrimagnetic ceramic material composed of rust and a metallic element

A ferrite is a ceramic material made by mixing and firing large proportions of iron(III) oxide blended with small proportions of one or more additional metallic elements, such as strontium, barium, manganese, nickel, and zinc. They are ferrimagnetic, meaning they can be magnetized or attracted to a magnet. Unlike other ferromagnetic materials, most ferrites are not electrically conductive, making them useful in applications like magnetic cores for transformers to suppress eddy currents. Ferrites can be divided into two families based on their resistance to being demagnetized.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Organocopper chemistry</span> Compound with carbon to copper bonds

Organocopper chemistry is the study of the physical properties, reactions, and synthesis of organocopper compounds, which are organometallic compounds containing a carbon to copper chemical bond. They are reagents in organic chemistry.

In organic chemistry, the Buchwald–Hartwig amination is a chemical reaction for the synthesis of carbon–nitrogen bonds via the palladium-catalyzed coupling reactions of amines with aryl halides. Although Pd-catalyzed C-N couplings were reported as early as 1983, Stephen L. Buchwald and John F. Hartwig have been credited, whose publications between 1994 and the late 2000s established the scope of the transformation. The reaction's synthetic utility stems primarily from the shortcomings of typical methods for the synthesis of aromatic C−N bonds, with most methods suffering from limited substrate scope and functional group tolerance. The development of the Buchwald–Hartwig reaction allowed for the facile synthesis of aryl amines, replacing to an extent harsher methods while significantly expanding the repertoire of possible C−N bond formation.

The Castro–Stephens coupling is a cross coupling reaction between a copper(I) acetylide and an aryl halide in pyridine, forming a disubstituted alkyne and a copper(I) halide.

In organic chemistry, the Kumada coupling is a type of cross coupling reaction, useful for generating carbon–carbon bonds by the reaction of a Grignard reagent and an organic halide. The procedure uses transition metal catalysts, typically nickel or palladium, to couple a combination of two alkyl, aryl or vinyl groups. The groups of Robert Corriu and Makoto Kumada reported the reaction independently in 1972.

Magnetic nanoparticles are a class of nanoparticle that can be manipulated using magnetic fields. Such particles commonly consist of two components, a magnetic material, often iron, nickel and cobalt, and a chemical component that has functionality. While nanoparticles are smaller than 1 micrometer in diameter, the larger microbeads are 0.5–500 micrometer in diameter. Magnetic nanoparticle clusters that are composed of a number of individual magnetic nanoparticles are known as magnetic nanobeads with a diameter of 50–200 nanometers. Magnetic nanoparticle clusters are a basis for their further magnetic assembly into magnetic nanochains. The magnetic nanoparticles have been the focus of much research recently because they possess attractive properties which could see potential use in catalysis including nanomaterial-based catalysts, biomedicine and tissue specific targeting, magnetically tunable colloidal photonic crystals, microfluidics, magnetic resonance imaging, magnetic particle imaging, data storage, environmental remediation, nanofluids, optical filters, defect sensor, magnetic cooling and cation sensors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Manganese(II,III) oxide</span> Chemical compound

Manganese(II,III) oxide is the chemical compound with formula Mn3O4. Manganese is present in two oxidation states +2 and +3 and the formula is sometimes written as MnO·Mn2O3. Mn3O4 is found in nature as the mineral hausmannite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Liebeskind–Srogl coupling</span>

The Liebeskind–Srogl coupling reaction is an organic reaction forming a new carbon–carbon bond from a thioester and a boronic acid using a metal catalyst. It is a cross-coupling reaction. This reaction was invented by and named after Jiri Srogl from the Academy of Sciences, Czech Republic, and Lanny S. Liebeskind from Emory University, Atlanta, Georgia, USA. There are three generations of this reaction, with the first generation shown below. The original transformation used catalytic Pd(0), TFP = tris(2-furyl)phosphine as an additional ligand and stoichiometric CuTC = copper(I) thiophene-2-carboxylate as a co-metal catalyst. The overall reaction scheme is shown below.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Iron oxide nanoparticle</span>

Iron oxide nanoparticles are iron oxide particles with diameters between about 1 and 100 nanometers. The two main forms are magnetite and its oxidized form maghemite. They have attracted extensive interest due to their superparamagnetic properties and their potential applications in many fields including molecular imaging.

The spinels are any of a class of minerals of general formulation AB
2X
4 which crystallise in the cubic (isometric) crystal system, with the X anions arranged in a cubic close-packed lattice and the cations A and B occupying some or all of the octahedral and tetrahedral sites in the lattice. Although the charges of A and B in the prototypical spinel structure are +2 and +3, respectively, other combinations incorporating divalent, trivalent, or tetravalent cations, including magnesium, zinc, iron, manganese, aluminium, chromium, titanium, and silicon, are also possible. The anion is normally oxygen; when other chalcogenides constitute the anion sublattice the structure is referred to as a thiospinel.

Decarboxylative cross coupling reactions are chemical reactions in which a carboxylic acid is reacted with an organic halide to form a new carbon-carbon bond, concomitant with loss of CO2. Aryl and alkyl halides participate. Metal catalyst, base, and oxidant are required.

The Chan–Lam coupling reaction – also known as the Chan–Evans–Lam coupling is a cross-coupling reaction between an aryl boronic acid and an alcohol or an amine to form the corresponding secondary aryl amines or aryl ethers, respectively. The Chan–Lam coupling is catalyzed by copper complexes. It can be conducted in air at room temperature. The more popular Buchwald–Hartwig coupling relies on the use of palladium.

Heterobimetallic catalysis is an approach to catalysis that employs two different metals to promote a chemical reaction. Included in this definition are cases where: 1) each metal activates a different substrate, 2) both metals interact with the same substrate, and 3) only one metal directly interacts with the substrate(s), while the second metal interacts with the first.

Heterogeneous metal catalyzed cross-coupling is a subset of metal catalyzed cross-coupling in which a heterogeneous metal catalyst is employed. Generally heterogeneous cross-coupling catalysts consist of a metal dispersed on an inorganic surface or bound to a polymeric support with ligands. Heterogeneous catalysts provide potential benefits over homogeneous catalysts in chemical processes in which cross-coupling is commonly employed—particularly in the fine chemical industry—including recyclability and lower metal contamination of reaction products. However, for cross-coupling reactions, heterogeneous metal catalysts can suffer from pitfalls such as poor turnover and poor substrate scope, which have limited their utility in cross-coupling reactions to date relative to homogeneous catalysts. Heterogeneous metal catalyzed cross-couplings, as with homogeneous metal catalyzed ones, most commonly use Pd as the cross-coupling metal.

References

  1. 1 2 "Cuprospinel" (PDF). Mineral Data Publishing. Retrieved 13 October 2010.
  2. 1 2 Mindat.org
  3. ↑ Webmineral data
  4. ↑ SigmalAldrich
  5. ↑ SigmalAldrich
  6. ↑ Chemspider
  7. ↑ Chemspider
  8. ↑ Pubchem
  9. ↑ Pubchem
  10. 1 2 Ohnishi, Haruyuki; Teranishi, Teruo (1961). "Crystal Distortion in Copper Ferrite-Chromite Series". Journal of the Physical Society of Japan . 16 (1): 35–43. Bibcode:1961JPSJ...16...35O. doi:10.1143/JPSJ.16.35.
  11. ↑ Tranquada, J. M.; Heald, S. M.; Moodenbaugh, A. R. (1987). "X-ray-absorption near-edge-structure study of La2−x(Ba, Sr)xCuO4−y superconductors". Physical Review B . 36 (10): 5263–5274. Bibcode:1987PhRvB..36.5263T. doi:10.1103/PhysRevB.36.5263. PMID   9942162.
  12. ↑ Birch, William D. "Who's Who in Mineral Names" (PDF). RocksAndMinerals.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on 6 July 2011. Retrieved 13 October 2010.
  13. ↑ Fleischer, Michael; Mandarino, Joseph A. (1974). "New Mineral Names" (PDF). American Mineralogist . 59: 381–384. Retrieved 13 October 2010.
  14. ↑ Jing Zhang; Wei Zhang; Rong Xu; Xunying Wang; Xiang Yang; Yan Wu (2017). "Electrochemical properties and catalyst functions of natural CuFe oxide mineral–LZSDC composite electrolyte". International Journal of Hydrogen Energy. 42 (34): 22185–22191. doi:10.1016/j.ijhydene.2017.01.163.
  15. ↑ I.V. Pekov; F.D. Sandalov; N.N. Koshlyakova; M.F. Vigasina; Y.S. Polekhovsky; S.N. Britvin; E.G. Sidorov; A.G. Turchkova (2018). "Copper in Natural Oxide Spinels: The New Mineral Thermaerogenite CuAl2O4, Cuprospinel and Cu-Enriched Varieties of Other Spinel-Group Members from Fumaroles of the Tolbachik Volcano, Kamchatka, Russia". Minerals. 8 (11): 498. Bibcode:2018Mine....8..498P. doi: 10.3390/min8110498 .{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  16. 1 2 Krishnan, Venkata; Selvan, Ramakrishnan Kalai; Augustin, Chanassary Ouso; Gedanken, Aharon; Bertagnolli, Helmut (2007). "EXAFS and XANES Investigations of CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles and CuFe2O4−MO2 (M = Sn, Ce) Nanocomposites" (PDF). The Journal of Physical Chemistry C . 111 (45): 16724–16733. doi:10.1021/jp073746t.
  17. 1 2 3 4 Estrella, Michael; Barrio, Laura; Zhou, Gong; Wang, Xianqin; Wang, Qi; Wen, Wen; Hanson, Jonathan C.; Frenkel, Anatoly I.; Rodriguez, José A. (2009). "In Situ Characterization of CuFe2O4 and Cu/Fe3O4 Water−Gas Shift Catalysts". The Journal of Physical Chemistry C . 113 (32): 14411–14417. doi:10.1021/jp903818q.
  18. 1 2 3 4 Nguyen, Anh T.; Nguyen, Lan T. M.; Nguyen, Chung K.; Truong, Thanh; Phan, Nam T. S. (2014). "Superparamagnetic Copper Ferrite Nanoparticles as an Efficient Heterogeneous Catalyst for the α-Arylation of 1,3-Diketones with C–C Cleavage". ChemCatChem . 6 (3): 815–823. doi:10.1002/cctc.201300708. S2CID   97619313.
  19. ↑ Anandan, S.; Selvamani, T.; Prasad, G. Guru; M. Asiri, A.; J. Wu, J. (2017). "Magnetic and catalytic properties of inverse spinel CuFe2O4 nanoparticles". Journal of Magnetism and Magnetic Materials . 432: 437–443. Bibcode:2017JMMM..432..437A. doi:10.1016/j.jmmm.2017.02.026.
  20. 1 2 Zhang, Wenjuan; Xue, Yongqiang; Cui, Zixiang (2017). "Effect of Size on the Structural Transition and Magnetic Properties of Nano-CuFe2O4". Industrial & Engineering Chemistry Research . 56 (46): 13760–13765. doi:10.1021/acs.iecr.7b03468.
  21. 1 2 3 Nguyen, Anh T.; Pham, Lam T.; Phan, Nam T. S.; Truong, Thanh (2014). "Efficient and robust superparamagnetic copper ferrite nanoparticle-catalyzed sequential methylation and C–H activation: aldehyde-free propargylamine synthesis". Catalysis Science & Technology . 4 (12): 4281–4288. doi:10.1039/C4CY00753K.
  22. 1 2 3 4 Dandia, Anshu; Jain, Anuj K.; Sharma, Sonam (2013). "CuFe2O4 nanoparticles as a highly efficient and magnetically recoverable catalyst for the synthesis of medicinally privileged spiropyrimidine scaffolds". RSC Advances . 3 (9): 2924. Bibcode:2013RSCAd...3.2924D. doi:10.1039/C2RA22477A.
  23. ↑ Phuruangrat, Anukorn; Kuntalue, Budsabong; Thongtem, Somchai; Thongtem, Titipun (2016). "Synthesis of cubic CuFe2O4 nanoparticles by microwave-hydrothermal method and their magnetic properties". Materials Letters . 167: 65–68. doi:10.1016/j.matlet.2016.01.005.
  24. ↑ de Souza, Alexilda Oliveira; do Carmo Rangel, Maria (2003). "Catalytic activity of aluminium and copper-doped magnetite in the high temperature shift reaction". Reaction Kinetics and Catalysis Letters . 79 (1): 175–180. doi:10.1023/A:1024132406523. S2CID   189864191.
  25. ↑ Quadro, Emerentino Brazil; Dias, Maria de Lourdes Ribeiro; Amorim, Adelaide Maria Mendonça; Rangel, Maria do Carmo (1999). "Chromium and Copper-Doped Magnetite Catalysts for the High Temperature Shift Reaction". Journal of the Brazilian Chemical Society . 10 (1): 51–59. doi: 10.1590/S0103-50531999000100009 .
  26. 1 2 Karimi, Babak; Mansouri, Fariborz; Mirzaei, Hamid M. (2015). "Recent Applications of Magnetically Recoverable Nanocatalysts in C–C and C–X Coupling Reactions". ChemCatChem . 7 (12): 1736–1789. doi:10.1002/cctc.201403057. S2CID   97232790.
  27. 1 2 Ortiz-Quiñonez, Jose Luis; Pal, Umpada; Das, Sachindranath (June 2022). "Catalytic and pseudocapacitive energy storage performance of metal (Co, Ni, Cu and Mn) ferrite nanostructures and nanocomposites". Progress in Materials Science. 130: 100995. doi:10.1016/j.pmatsci.2022.100995. S2CID   249860566.
  28. ↑ Kantam, M. Lakshmi; Yadav, Jagjit; Laha, Soumi; Jha, Shailendra (2009). "ChemInform Abstract: Synthesis of Propargylamines by Three-Component Coupling of Aldehydes, Amines and Alkynes Catalyzed by Magnetically Separable Copper Ferrite Nanoparticles". ChemInform . 40 (49). doi:10.1002/chin.200949091.
  29. ↑ Tamaddon, Fatemeh; Amirpoor, Farideh (2013). "Improved Catalyst-Free Synthesis of Pyrrole Derivatives in Aqueous Media". Synlett . 24 (14): 1791–1794. doi:10.1055/s-0033-1339294. S2CID   196756104.
  30. ↑ Zhang, Rongzhao; Liu, Jianming; Wang, Shoufeng; Niu, Jianzhong; Xia, Chungu; Sun, Wei (2011). "Magnetic CuFe2O4 Nanoparticles as an Efficient Catalyst for C–O Cross-Coupling of Phenols with Aryl Halides". ChemCatChem . 3 (1): 146–149. doi:10.1002/cctc.201000254. S2CID   97538800.
  31. 1 2 Yang, Shuliang; Xie, Wenbing; Zhou, Hua; Wu, Cunqi; Yang, Yanqin; Niu, Jiajia; Yang, Wei; Xu, Jingwei (2013). "Alkoxylation reactions of aryl halides catalyzed by magnetic copper ferrite". Tetrahedron . 69 (16): 3415–3418. doi:10.1016/j.tet.2013.02.077.
  32. 1 2 Nguyen, Chung K.; Nguyen, Ngon N.; Tran, Kien N.; Nguyen, Viet D.; Nguyen, Tung T.; Le, Dung T.; Phan, Nam T.S. (2017). "Copper ferrite superparamagnetic nanoparticles as a heterogeneous catalyst for directed phenol/formamide coupling". Tetrahedron Letters . 58 (34): 3370–3373. doi:10.1016/j.tetlet.2017.07.049.
  33. ↑ Panda, Niranjan; Jena, Ashis Kumar; Mohapatra, Sasmita (2011). "Ligand-free Fe–Cu Cocatalyzed Cross-coupling of Terminal Alkynes with Aryl Halides". Chemistry Letters . 40 (9): 956–958. doi:10.1246/cl.2011.956.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.