Douglas Lake Member

Last updated
Douglas Lake Member [1] [2]
Stratigraphic range: Darriwilian
Chasmataspis laurencii USNM PAL 125099.jpg
Holotype specimen of Chasmataspis laurencii
Type Member [2]
Unit of Lenoir Limestone
Underliesnodular member of Lenoir Limestone
OverliesMascot Dolomite (Knox Group)
Thicknessup to 37 meters (121 ft)
Lithology
Primaryrubble conglomerate, chert conglomerate, and black dolomite [1]
Other Shale (shaly dolomite), volcanic ash [4]
Location
Regioneastern Flag of Tennessee.svg  Tennessee
CountryFlag of the United States.svg  USA
Extentdiscontinuous, paleokarst fills in top of Mascot Dolomite
Type section
Named for Douglas Lake (Douglas Reservoir)
Named byJ. Bridge [1]
Locationnorth shore of Douglas Lake, 2.4 kilometers (1.5 mi) northeast of the Douglas Dam
Year defined1995

The Douglas Lake Member is a geologic unit of member rank [2] of the Lenoir Limestone that overlies the Mascot Dolomite and underlies typical nodular member of the Lenoir Limestone in Douglas Lake, Tennessee, region. It fills depressions that are part of a regional unconformity at the base of Middle Ordovician strata, locally the Lenoir Limestone, that separates them from the underlying Lower Ordovician strata, locally the Knox Group. [1] [2] [4]

Contents

Nomenclature

The type locality of the Douglas Lake Member lies on the north shore of Douglas Lake, 2.4 kilometers (1.5 mi) northeast of Douglas Dam, Jefferson County. It was named by Josiah Bridge for Douglas Lake, Tennessee. [1] [2]

Lithology

The Douglas Lake Member is composed of a diverse set of sedimentary rocks, including rubble conglomerate, chert conglomerate, and black dolomite. In outcrops along the north shore of Lake Douglas, the chert conglomerate overlies the rubble conglomerate and both of which fill prehistoric sinkholes, called paleokarst , developed in upper surface of the Mascot Dolomite. Up to 10 meters (33 ft) of black, fine-grained, thick-bedded dolomite fill two large, prehistoric sinkholes and grade upward almost imperceptibly into Lenoir Limestone. [1] Such paleokarst depression fills, which are part of a regional unconformity, are common throughout this region. They are generally included in the Lenoir Limestone as the Douglas Lake Member. [5]

At Douglas Dam, the Douglas Lake Member consists of three-part sequence of volcanic ash, conglomerate and shale and / or shaly dolomite that fill one of these ancient sinkholes developed in the Mascot Dolomite of the Knox Group. This prehistoric sinkhole varies between 18 and 27 meters (59 and 89 ft) in with and is at least 45 meters (148 ft) deep. [2] [4] The upper unit consisted of about 11 meters (36 ft) of thin-bedded, slabby reworked volcanic ash and impure dolomite with green shale partings. The upper unit overlaid a middle unit, which consisted of varve-like graded beds with concentrations of organic matter at their top and interlayered with recurrent layers and lenses of conglomerate and breccia. It is this unit from which all of the fossils were recovered. The lowest unit consisted of the lowest member is composed of 22 meters (72 ft) of massive, blocky, fine-grained, pyroclastics without laminations. [6] This exposure of the Douglas Lake Member was named the 33 beds in 1944. [7] In 1955, the 33 beds were assigned to the Douglas Lake Member of the Lenoir Limestone. [1] [4] The 33 beds were completely excavated for construction of Douglas Dam by the Tennessee Valley Authority in 1942, but yielded articulated arthropod fossils including Chasmataspis and Douglasocaris . [6] [8] This kind of preservation by volcanic ash is paralleled by Silurian Herefordshire Lagerstätte. [8]

Fossils

At Douglas Dam, the Douglas Lake Member has long been known for its articulated Chasmataspidid Chasmataspsis laurenci and phyllocarid Douglasocaris collinsi. [6] In addition, enigmatic fossil Cestites mirabilis is known, originally interpreted as ctenophore. [8]

In 2000, Gregory Retallack, who is famous for paleobotany research and interpretation of Ediacaran Biota as terrestrial environment, [9] considered this site as terrestrial environment with plant fossils. [10] In 2019, he claimed compression fossils of a variety of non-vascular land plants, described four taxa of plants, two taxa of fungi and reinterpreted Cestites as a liverwort. [3]

TaxonInterpretationImage
Cestites mirabilisConsidered as a liverwort in the family Marchantiaceae. It has narrow gametophyte thallus, with a wide midrib and dichotomizing at long intervals. The archegoniophores are parasol shaped and clustered.
Cestites mirabilis fertile.jpg
Casterlorum crispumConsidered as a liverwort in the family Leiosporocerotaceae. It has a wide dichotomizing gametophyte thallus with dichotomizing dark lines interpreted as mucilage canals with cyanobacterial symbionts. The sporophyte horns have a thick basal involucre and when dehisced form whip like curls. Spores are small and laevigate. The genus was named in honor of Ken Caster.
Casterlorum crispum holotype.jpg
Janegraya sibyllaConsidered as a minute balloonwort (Sphaerocarpaceae), similar to living Sphaerocarpos . Its spores are permanent tetrads closed within a thin perine, widely known among Ordovician dispersed spores as Tetrahedraletes . [11] The generic name honors Jane Gray, and the epithet means "prophetess".
Janegraya sibylla.jpg
Dollyphyton boucotiiConsidered as a peat moss in the family Flatbergiaceae. Its leaves are wide and have lateral teeth. Its capsule is terminal on a short pseudopodium. Unlike most peat mosses Dollyphyton has broad leaves like those of the living peat moss Flatbergium, considered basal to Sphagnales. [12] The generic name honors Dolly Parton whose Dollywood resort is nearby. The epithet honors Art Boucot.
Dollyphyton boucotii.jpg
Edwardsiphyton ovatumConsidered as a moss in the family Pottiaceae. It has narrow acutely pointed leaves and recurved capsules. Spores are small and verrucate. The genus was named in honor of Dianne Edwards, and the epithet refers to the shape of the capsules.
Edwardsiphyton ovatum.jpg
Palaeoglomus strotheriMicroscopic mycorrhizal fungus.
Palaeoglomus strotheri.jpg
Prototaxites honeggeriConsidered as the earliest appearance of genus of giant fungi Prototaxites.
Prototaxites honeggeri holotype.jpg

He claimed that the fossils are compressions of original carapaces of the arthropods and the organic carbon of the plant fossils. [3] While this is accepted in a few studies and review of his book, [13] [14] [15] in 2022 researchers such as paleobotanist Dianne Edwards who studied about Paleozoic plants referred his study and commented "When diagnostic features are absent, such fragmentary organic materials can be misinterpreted, leading to implausible attributions". [16] This is agreed in later review as well, considered to lack sufficient characters to be unequivocally assigned to land plants. [17]

Age

The paleokarst depressions occupied by the Douglas Lake Member are part of the Knox Unconformity that separates the Lower Ordovician Knox Group from the Middle Ordovician Chickamauga Group. The Lenoir Limestone is the basal unit of the Chickamauga Group in the Douglas Lake region. In this region, the Knox Unconformity is a highly irregular surface, which appears to represent karst terrain that formed during a 12- to 13-million-year-long period of subaerial exposure that forms a hiatus in sedimentary record between the Sauk and Tippecanoe sequences. This unconformity represents periods of falling relative sea level starting in latter part of the Floian Stage, which halted the accumulation marine sediments of the Knox Group and exposed the region to terrestrial erosion and karstification. It is not until late in the Darriwilian Stage that rises in relative sea level drowned the Douglas Lake region and initiated the accumulation of the marine sediments that now comprise the Lenoir Limestone. [18] Therefore, the Douglas Lake Member and the fossils it contains are younger than the underlying Floian strata and older than the late Darriwilian limestones of the Lenoir Limestone. [3]

Depositional environment

At Douglas Dam, the Douglas Lake Member is argued to have accumulated within a within a cenote at a time of lowered sealevel and, based on paleogeographic reconstructions, to have been many kilometers from the sea. [7] [19] Caster and Brooks [6] differently interprets the environment of deposition at Douglas Dam as being a marine submarine spring fed by an underground channel or system of underground channels from the nearby land. Steinhauff and Walker suggested that a lagoonal marginal marine setting is the most likely. [8]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of the Grand Canyon area</span> Aspect of geology

The geology of the Grand Canyon area includes one of the most complete and studied sequences of rock on Earth. The nearly 40 major sedimentary rock layers exposed in the Grand Canyon and in the Grand Canyon National Park area range in age from about 200 million to nearly 2 billion years old. Most were deposited in warm, shallow seas and near ancient, long-gone sea shores in western North America. Both marine and terrestrial sediments are represented, including lithified sand dunes from an extinct desert. There are at least 14 known unconformities in the geologic record found in the Grand Canyon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kaibab Limestone</span> Geologic formation in the southwestern United States

The Kaibab Limestone is a resistant cliff-forming, Permian geologic formation that crops out across the U.S. states of northern Arizona, southern Utah, east central Nevada and southeast California. It is also known as the Kaibab Formation in Arizona, Nevada, and Utah. The Kaibab Limestone forms the rim of the Grand Canyon. In the Big Maria Mountains, California, the Kaibab Limestone is highly metamorphosed and known as the Kaibab Marble.

The geology of Illinois includes extensive deposits of marine sedimentary rocks from the Palaeozoic, as well as relatively minor contributions from the Mesozoic and Cenozoic. Ice age glaciation left a wealth of glacial topographic features throughout the state.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Monte San Giorgio</span> Mountain in Switzerland and Italy

Monte San Giorgio is a Swiss mountain and UNESCO World Heritage Site near the border between Switzerland and Italy. It is part of the Lugano Prealps, overlooking Lake Lugano in the Swiss Canton of Ticino.

The Ordovician Bellefonte Formation is a mapped bedrock unit in central Pennsylvania. It is the uppermost unit of the Beekmantown Group. The top of the Bellefonte is marked by the Knox Unconformity.

Flatbergiaceae is a family of mosses in the order Sphagnales with a single extant genus, Flatbergium.

Fujian is a south eastern coastal province of China. The eastern half of the province is largely covered by Jurassic Period acid volcanic rocks and Cretaceous tuffaceous sandstone. However, there are rocks of a variety of ages including the oldest around 1800 Ma. The deposits from the Triassic are predominantly on land, whereas the older ones are marine sediments.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Surprise Canyon Formation</span> Landform in the Grand Canyon, Arizona

The Surprise Canyon Formation is a geologic formation that consists of clastic and calcareous sedimentary rocks that fill paleovalleys and paleokarst of Late Mississippian (Serpukhovian) age in Grand Canyon. These strata outcrop as isolated, lens-shaped exposures of rocks that fill erosional valleys and locally karsted topography and caves developed in the top of the Redwall Limestone. The Surprise Canyon Formation and associated unconformities represent a significant period of geologic time between the deposition of the Redwall Limestone and the overlying Supai Group.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of the Isle of Skye</span>

The geology of the Isle of Skye in Scotland is highly varied and the island's landscape reflects changes in the underlying nature of the rocks. A wide range of rock types are exposed on the island, sedimentary, metamorphic and igneous, ranging in age from the Archaean through to the Quaternary.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Black River Group</span> Geologic group in Eastern and Midwestern, USA

The Black River Group is a geologic group that covers three sedimentary basins in the Eastern and Midwestern United States. These include the Appalachian Basin, Illinois Basin and the Michigan Basin. It dates back to the Late Ordovician period. It is roughly equivalent to the Platteville Group in Illinois. In Kentucky and Tennessee it is also known as the High Bridge Group. In areas where this Geologic Unit thins it is also called the Black River Formation (undifferentiated). One example of this is over the Cincinnati Arch & Findley Arch. Large parts of the Black River have been dolomized (where the parent limestone CaCO3 has been turned into dolomite CaMg(CO3)2.) This happed when there was interaction of hot saline brine and the limestone. This created hydrothermal dolomites that in some areas serve as petroleum reservoirs.

The geology of Ohio formed beginning more than one billion years ago in the Proterozoic eon of the Precambrian. The igneous and metamorphic crystalline basement rock is poorly understood except through deep boreholes and does not outcrop at the surface. The basement rock is divided between the Grenville Province and Superior Province. When the Grenville Province crust collided with Proto-North America, it launched the Grenville orogeny, a major mountain building event. The Grenville mountains eroded, filling in rift basins and Ohio was flooded and periodically exposed as dry land throughout the Paleozoic. In addition to marine carbonates such as limestone and dolomite, large deposits of shale and sandstone formed as subsequent mountain building events such as the Taconic orogeny and Acadian orogeny led to additional sediment deposition. Ohio transitioned to dryland conditions in the Pennsylvanian, forming large coal swamps and the region has been dryland ever since. Until the Pleistocene glaciations erased these features, the landscape was cut with deep stream valleys, which scoured away hundreds of meters of rock leaving little trace of geologic history in the Mesozoic and Cenozoic.

The geology of Missouri includes deep Precambrian basement rocks formed within the last two billion years and overlain by thick sequences of marine sedimentary rocks, interspersed with igneous rocks by periods of volcanic activity. Missouri is a leading producer of lead from minerals formed in Paleozoic dolomite.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Wyoming</span>

The geology of Wyoming includes some of the oldest Archean rocks in North America, overlain by thick marine and terrestrial sediments formed during the Paleozoic, Mesozoic and Cenozoic, including oil, gas and coal deposits. Throughout its geologic history, Wyoming has been uplifted several times during the formation of the Rocky Mountains, which produced complicated faulting that traps hydrocarbons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Utah</span>

The geology of Utah, in the western United States, includes rocks formed at the edge of the proto-North American continent during the Precambrian. A shallow marine sedimentary environment covered the region for much of the Paleozoic and Mesozoic, followed by dryland conditions, volcanism, and the formation of the basin and range terrain in the Cenozoic.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Afghanistan</span>

The geology of Afghanistan includes nearly one billion year old rocks from the Precambrian. The region experienced widespread marine transgressions and deposition during the Paleozoic and Mesozoic, that continued into the Cenozoic with the uplift of the Hindu Kush mountains.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Geology of Uzbekistan</span>

The geology of Uzbekistan consists of two microcontinents and the remnants of oceanic crust, which fused together into a tectonically complex but resource rich land mass during the Paleozoic, before becoming draped in thick, primarily marine sedimentary units.

The geology of Saudi Arabia includes Precambrian igneous and metamorphic basement rocks, exposed across much of the country. Thick sedimentary sequences from the Phanerozoic dominate much of the country's surface and host oil.

<i>Palaeoglomus</i> Genus of fungi

Palaeoglomus is a genus of microscopic mycorrhizal fossil, found in palynological preparations of rocks which separate out organic remains by acid dissolution.

<i>Douglasocaris</i> Genus of small freshwater animals

Douglasocaris is a genus of bivalved arthropod from the Middle Ordovician Douglas Lake Member of the Lenoir Limestone from Douglas Dam Tennessee.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Knox Supergroup</span> Widespread geologic group in the Southeastern United States

The Knox Supergroup, also known as the Knox Group and the Knox Formation, is a widespread geologic group in the Southeastern United States. The age is from the Late Cambrian to the Early Ordovician. Predominantly, it is composed of carbonates, chiefly dolomite, with some limestone. There are also cherty inclusions as well as thin beds of sandstone.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 Bridge, J., 1955. Disconformity between Lower and Middle Ordovician Series at Douglas Lake, Tennessee.Geological Society of America Bulletin, 66(6), pp.725-730.
  2. 1 2 3 4 5 6 U.S. Geological Survey, 2020. Geologic Unit: Douglas Lake, National Geologic Map Database.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Retallack, G.J. (2019). "Ordovician land plants and fungi from Douglas Dam, Tennessee". The Palaeobotanist. 68: 1–33.
  4. 1 2 3 4 Walker, K.R., Steinhauff, D.M., and Roberson, K.E., 1992. Uppermost Knox Group, the Knox unconformity, the Middle Ordovician transition from shallow shelf to deeper basin at Dandridge, Tennessee, In Driese, S.G., and others, eds., Paleosols, paleoweathering surfaces, and sequence boundaries, University of Tennessee, Department of Geological Sciences Studies in Geology, no. 21, p. 13–18.
  5. ↑ Carpenter, R.H., Fagan, J.M. and Wedow, H., 1971. Evidence on the age of barite, zinc, and iron mineralization in the lower Paleozoic rocks of east Tennessee.Economic Geology, 66(5), pp.792-798.
  6. 1 2 3 4 Caster, K.E.; Brooks, H.K. (1956). "New fossils from the Canadian–Chazyan (Ordovician) hiatus in Tennessee". Bulletins of American Paleontology. 36: 157–199.
  7. 1 2 Laurence, R.A., 1944. An early Ordovician sinkhole deposit of volcanic ash and fossiliferous sediments in east Tennessee. The Journal of Geology, 52(4), pp.235-249.
  8. 1 2 3 4 Dunlop, Jason A.; Anderson, Lyall I.; Braddy, Simon J. (2003). "A redescription of Chasmataspis laurencii Caster & Brooks, 1956 (Chelicerata: Chasmataspidida) from the Middle Ordovician of Tennessee, USA, with remarks on chasmataspid phylogeny". Earth and Environmental Science Transactions of the Royal Society of Edinburgh. 94 (3): 207–225. doi:10.1017/S0263593300000626. ISSN   1473-7116. S2CID   130713268.
  9. ↑ Retallack, G. J. (1994). "Were Ediacaran fossils lichens?". Paleobiology. 20 (4): 523–544. Bibcode:1994Pbio...20..523R. doi:10.1017/S0094837300012975. S2CID   129180481.
  10. ↑ Retallack, Gregory J. (2000). "Ordovician Life on Land and Early Paleozoic Global Change". The Paleontological Society Papers. 6: 21–46. doi:10.1017/S1089332600000693. ISSN   1089-3326.
  11. ↑ Wellman, Charles H.; Cascales-Miñana, Borja; Servais, Thomas (2023). "Terrestrialization in the Ordovician". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 532 (1): 171–190. Bibcode:2023GSLSP.532...92W. doi: 10.1144/SP532-2022-92 . S2CID   253011815.
  12. ↑ Shaw, A.J.; Cox, C.J.; Buck, W.R.; Devos, N.; Buchanan, A.M.; Cave, L.; Seppelt, R.; Shaw, B.; Larrain, J.; Andrus, R.; Greilhuber, J. (2022). "Newly resolved relationships in an early plant lineage: Bryophyta Class Sphagnopsida (peat mosses)". American Journal of Botany. 974: 1511–1531.
  13. ↑ Vajda, Vivi; Cavalcante, Larissa; Palmgren, Kristoffer; Krüger, Ashley; Ivarsson, Magnus (2023-01-01). "Prototaxites reinterpreted as mega-rhizomorphs, facilitating nutrient transport in early terrestrial ecosystems". Canadian Journal of Microbiology. 69 (1): 17–31. doi: 10.1139/cjm-2021-0358 . ISSN   0008-4166. PMID   36511419. S2CID   254670640.
  14. ↑ Draper, Isabel; Garilleti, Ricardo; Calleja, Juan Antonio; Flagmeier, Maren; Mazimpaka, Vicente; Vigalondo, Beatriz; Lara, Francisco (2021). "Insights Into the Evolutionary History of the Subfamily Orthotrichoideae (Orthotrichaceae, Bryophyta): New and Former Supra-Specific Taxa So Far Obscured by Prevailing Homoplasy". Frontiers in Plant Science. 12. doi: 10.3389/fpls.2021.629035 . ISSN   1664-462X. PMC   8034389 . PMID   33841460.
  15. ↑ Leigh, Egbert Giles (2022-09-12). "Fossil soils: trace fossils of ecosystems on land and windows on the context of evolution". Evolution: Education and Outreach. 15 (1): 14. doi: 10.1186/s12052-022-00173-3 . ISSN   1936-6434.
  16. ↑ Edwards, Dianne; Morris, Jennifer L.; Axe, Lindsey; Duckett, Jeffrey G.; Pressel, Silvia; Kenrick, Paul (2022). "Piecing together the eophytes – a new group of ancient plants containing cryptospores". New Phytologist. 233 (3): 1440–1455. doi: 10.1111/nph.17703 . ISSN   0028-646X. PMID   34806774. S2CID   244495761.
  17. ↑ Wellman, Charles H.; Cascales-Miñana, Borja; Servais, Thomas (2023). "Terrestrialization in the Ordovician". Geological Society, London, Special Publications. 532 (1): 171–190. Bibcode:2023GSLSP.532...92W. doi: 10.1144/SP532-2022-92 . ISSN   0305-8719. S2CID   253011815.
  18. ↑ Morgan, William A., 2012, Sequence stratigraphy of the great American carbonate bank, In J. R. Derby, R. D. Fritz, S. A. Longacre, W. A. Morgan, and C. A. Sternbach, eds., The great American carbonate bank: The geology and economic resources of the Cambrian — Ordovician Sauk megasequence of Laurentia. American Association of Petroleum Geologists Memoir 98, pp. 37–79.
  19. ↑ Gray, J. and Boucot, A.J., 1993. Early Silurian nonmarine animal remains and the nature of the early continental ecosystem. Acta Palaeontologica Polonica, 38(3-4), pp.303-328.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.