Edmond de Belamy

Last updated

Edmond de Belamy
Edmond de Belamy.png
ArtistObvious (collective)
Yearc. 2018
MediumInk print
SubjectMale portrait
Dimensions70 cm× 70 cm(27.5 in× 27.5 in)

Edmond de Belamy, sometimes referred to as Portrait of Edmond de Belamy, is a generative adversarial network (GAN) portrait painting constructed by Paris-based arts collective Obvious in 2018 from WikiArt 's artwork database. [1] Printed on canvas, the work belongs to a series of generative images called La Famille de Belamy. The print is known for being sold for US$ 432,500 during a Christie's 's auction. [2]

Contents

The name Belamy is a pun based on Ian Goodfellow, inventor of GANs. In French, "bel ami" means "good friend", which is an allude to Goodfellow's name.

The work has been criticized as having been created with another AI artist's uncredited code.

Auction

It gained media attention after Christie's announced its intention to auction the piece as the first artwork created using artificial intelligence to be featured in the "Prints & Multiples" sale at the Christie's Images New York auction. The picture was originally hung on the wall to the right of a bronze work by Roy Lichtenstein. [3]

The local and online auction's bidding was started on 23 October 2018 among five parties. [4] Six minutes into the bidding, the price went up to US$ 350,000; the price surpassed pre-auction estimates, which valued it at US$7,000 to US$10,000. [5] Seven minutes into the bidding, an anonymous phone bidder won the auction with a US$432,500 bid, [6] and the print was bought for US$432,500 on 25 October 2018, [7] [8] making it the second most expensive artwork in the auction, just cheaper than Andy Warhol’s artwork, Myths, the 254 cm × 254 cm 1981 artwork that was sold for US$780,500. [5] [9]

Obvious stated that the proceeds "will [be used] to refine the algorithm [and] create works that increasingly seem to have been created by a human being". [4]

Method

Obvious's members are Hugo Caselles-Dupré, Pierre Fautrel, and Gauthier Vernier. Caselles-Dupré stated that the algorithm used a "discriminator". [5] Hugo Caselles-Dupré found artist Robbie Barrat’s open source algorithm that was forked from Soumith Chintala on Github. [10] He then used the algorithm to be trained on a set of 15,000 portraits from the online art encyclopedia WikiArt, spanning the 14th to the 19th centuries. [11]

It is manually signed with ink at the bottom-right with , which is part of the loss function metaheuristic algorithm code that produced it. [12]

Description

The piece is a portrait depiction of a somewhat blurry man, primarily focused on the top-left corner of the canvas, surrounded by whiter color. The dominant colors in the portrait are brown and beige. [13] The painting has been associated with the aesthetic provisional name that was proposed by François Chollet, GANism, with 'characteristics' of indistinct-blurry imagery. [14]

It is generated and printed by Obvious; the canvas print measures 27 1⁄2 in × 27 1⁄2 in (70 cm × 70 cm) and is set within a gold-colored gilded wood frame. [6]

The work belongs to a series of eleven generative images called La Famille de Belamy (from French, lit. 'Belamy's family') that was meant to resemble Belamy's family tree. [15] Edmond de Belamy is the fictional descendant of Madame de Belamy, a name that was given to another artificial intelligence (AI) artwork made by Obvious. [16] The name Belamy is a tribute to Ian Goodfellow's name, inventor of GANs; in French, "bel ami" means "good friend", a translated pun based on good fellow. [14] Though the painting is not supposed to be a depiction of any real person. [17]

Reception

The piece has been criticized because it was created using a generative adversarial network (GAN) software package that was implemented by Robbie Barrat, a then-19-year-old AI artist who was not affiliated with Obvious. Although they did not originally publicize that they were using Barrat's code, Caselles-Dupré later admitted that they had used the code from Barrat with little modification. "If you’re just talking about the code, then there is not a big percentage that has been modified," Caselles-Dupré said. "But if you talk about working on the computer, making it work, there is a lot of effort there." Posts on the project's issue tracker show Obvious members requesting that Barrat provide them with support and custom features. [14]

On the same day that Edmond de Belamy was sold, Barrat posted two images of comparison between Edmond de Belamy and his "outputs from a neural network [he] trained and put online *over a year ago*" on Twitter, writing that they used his code only to later sell the results. [18] Mario Klingemann wrote that "You could argue that probably 90 percent of the actual 'work' was done by [Barrat]." [14]

The piece has also been criticized for whether it is real "art" or not. [19] Art critic Jonathan Jones did not acknowledge Edmond de Belamy as art. [20] The piece has been placed within a tradition of works calling into question the basis of the modern art market. [21] Research has used Edmond de Belamy to show how anthropomorphizing AI can affect allocations of responsibility and credit to artists. [22] [23]

In an interview, Caselles-Dupré said: "We are in the middle of a storm and lots of false information is released with our name on it. In fact, we are really depressed about it." [24] The "false information" that he was pointing to was that the painting was the first portrait that was generated by AI. [25]

The head of Christie’s prints and multiples department said he is no expert on AI, having learned about Obvious after reading an article about a collector’s purchase of one of Obvious's previous works for around € 10,000. [26]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Digital art</span> Art that is generated digitally with a computer

Digital art refers to any artistic work or practice that uses digital technology as part of the creative or presentation process. It can also refer to computational art that uses and engages with digital media.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Generative art</span> Art created by a set of rules, often using computers

Generative art is post-conceptual art that has been created with the use of an autonomous system. An autonomous system in this context is generally one that is non-human and can independently determine features of an artwork that would otherwise require decisions made directly by the artist. In some cases the human creator may claim that the generative system represents their own artistic idea, and in others that the system takes on the role of the creator.

Computer art is art in which computers play a role in the production or display of the artwork. Such art can be an image, sound, animation, video, CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, video game, website, algorithm, performance or gallery installation. Many traditional disciplines are now integrating digital technologies and, as a result, the lines between traditional works of art and new media works created using computers has been blurred. For instance, an artist may combine traditional painting with algorithm art and other digital techniques. As a result, defining computer art by its end product can thus be difficult. Computer art is bound to change over time since changes in technology and software directly affect what is possible.

In video games, artificial intelligence (AI) is used to generate responsive, adaptive or intelligent behaviors primarily in non-playable characters (NPCs) similar to human-like intelligence. Artificial intelligence has been an integral part of video games since their inception in the 1950s. AI in video games is a distinct subfield and differs from academic AI. It serves to improve the game-player experience rather than machine learning or decision making. During the golden age of arcade video games the idea of AI opponents was largely popularized in the form of graduated difficulty levels, distinct movement patterns, and in-game events dependent on the player's input. Modern games often implement existing techniques such as pathfinding and decision trees to guide the actions of NPCs. AI is often used in mechanisms which are not immediately visible to the user, such as data mining and procedural-content generation.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Human image synthesis</span> Computer generation of human images

Human image synthesis is technology that can be applied to make believable and even photorealistic renditions of human-likenesses, moving or still. It has effectively existed since the early 2000s. Many films using computer generated imagery have featured synthetic images of human-like characters digitally composited onto the real or other simulated film material. Towards the end of the 2010s deep learning artificial intelligence has been applied to synthesize images and video that look like humans, without need for human assistance, once the training phase has been completed, whereas the old school 7D-route required massive amounts of human work .

Music and artificial intelligence is the development of music software programs which use AI to generate music. As with applications in other fields, AI in music also simulates mental tasks. A prominent feature is the capability of an AI algorithm to learn based on past data, such as in computer accompaniment technology, wherein the AI is capable of listening to a human performer and performing accompaniment. Artificial intelligence also drives interactive composition technology, wherein a computer composes music in response to a live performance. There are other AI applications in music that cover not only music composition, production, and performance but also how music is marketed and consumed. Several music player programs have also been developed to use voice recognition and natural language processing technology for music voice control. Current research includes the application of AI in music composition, performance, theory and digital sound processing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Kevin Abosch</span> Irish conceptual artist

Kevin Abosch is an Irish conceptual artist and pioneer in cryptoart known for his works in photography, blockchain, sculpture, installation, AI and film. Abosch's work addresses the nature of identity, value and human currency and has been exhibited throughout the world, often in civic spaces, including The Hermitage Museum, The National Gallery of Ireland, The National Museum of China, The Irish Museum of Modern Art, The Museum of Contemporary Art Vojvodina, The Bogotá Museum of Modern Art, ZKM, Galerie nationale du Jeu de Paume, and Dublin Airport.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">WikiArt</span> User-generated website displaying artworks

WikiArt is a visual art wiki, active since 2010.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Generative adversarial network</span> Deep learning method

A generative adversarial network (GAN) is a class of machine learning frameworks and a prominent framework for approaching generative AI. The concept was initially developed by Ian Goodfellow and his colleagues in June 2014. In a GAN, two neural networks contest with each other in the form of a zero-sum game, where one agent's gain is another agent's loss.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mario Klingemann</span> German artist

Mario Klingemann is a German artist best known for his work involving neural networks, code, and algorithms. Klingemann was a Google Arts and Culture resident from 2016 to 2018, and he is considered as a pioneer in the use of computer learning in the arts. His works examine creativity, culture, and perception through machine learning and artificial intelligence, and have appeared at the Ars Electronica Festival, the Museum of Modern Art New York, the Metropolitan Museum of Art New York, the Photographers’ Gallery London, the Centre Pompidou Paris, and the British Library. Today he lives in Munich, where, in addition to his art under the name "Dog & Pony", he still runs a creative free space between gallery and Wunderkammer with the paper artist Alexandra Lukaschewitz.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artificial intelligence art</span> Machine application of knowledge of human aesthetic expressions

Artificial intelligence art is visual artwork created through the use of an artificial intelligence (AI) program.

Synthetic media is a catch-all term for the artificial production, manipulation, and modification of data and media by automated means, especially through the use of artificial intelligence algorithms, such as for the purpose of misleading people or changing an original meaning. Synthetic media as a field has grown rapidly since the creation of generative adversarial networks, primarily through the rise of deepfakes as well as music synthesis, text generation, human image synthesis, speech synthesis, and more. Though experts use the term "synthetic media," individual methods such as deepfakes and text synthesis are sometimes not referred to as such by the media but instead by their respective terminology Significant attention arose towards the field of synthetic media starting in 2017 when Motherboard reported on the emergence of AI altered pornographic videos to insert the faces of famous actresses. Potential hazards of synthetic media include the spread of misinformation, further loss of trust in institutions such as media and government, the mass automation of creative and journalistic jobs and a retreat into AI-generated fantasy worlds. Synthetic media is an applied form of artificial imagination.

The Fréchet inception distance (FID) is a metric used to assess the quality of images created by a generative model, like a generative adversarial network (GAN). Unlike the earlier inception score (IS), which evaluates only the distribution of generated images, the FID compares the distribution of generated images with the distribution of a set of real images. The FID metric does not completely replace the IS metric. Classifiers that achieve the best (lowest) FID score tend to have greater sample variety while classifiers achieving the best (highest) IS score tend to have better quality within individual images.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mike Winkelmann</span> American digital artist

Michael Joseph Winkelmann, known professionally as Beeple, is an American digital artist, graphic designer, and animator known for selling NFTs. In his art, he uses various media to create comical, phantasmagoric works that make political and social commentary while using pop culture figures as references. British auction house Christie's has called him "A visionary digital artist at the forefront of NFTs". Beeple was introduced to NFTs in October 2020 and credits Pak for providing his first "primer" on selling NFTs. The NFT associated with Everydays: the First 5000 Days, a collage of images from his "Everydays" series, was sold on March 12, 2021, for $69 million in cryptocurrency to an investor in NFTs. It is the first purely non-fungible token to be sold by Christie's. The auction house had previously sold Block 21, an NFT with accompanying physical painting for approximately $130,000 in October 2020.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Artbreeder</span> Art website

Artbreeder, formerly known as Ganbreeder, is a collaborative, machine learning-based art website. Using the models StyleGAN and BigGAN, the website allows users to generate and modify images of faces, landscapes, and paintings, among other categories.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jake Elwes</span> British media artist

Jake Elwes is a British media artist, hacker, radical faerie, neuroqueer, and researcher. Their practice is the exploration of artificial intelligence (AI), queer theory and technical biases. They are known for using AI to create art in mediums such as video, performance and installation. Their work on queering technology addresses issues caused by the normative biases of artificial intelligence.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Midjourney</span> Image-generating machine learning model

Midjourney is a generative artificial intelligence program and service created and hosted by the San Francisco–based independent research lab Midjourney, Inc. Midjourney generates images from natural language descriptions, called prompts, similar to OpenAI's DALL-E and Stability AI's Stable Diffusion. It is one of the technologies of the AI boom.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Ganimal</span> Fictional animal

A ganimal, also commonly referred to as GANimal, is a hybrid animal created with generative artificial intelligence systems, such as generative adversarial networks (GANs) or diffusion models. The concept was created for a website from the MIT Media Lab in 2020, where users could create ganimal images. 78,210 ganimals were generated from hybrid pairs of animal labels from BigGAN (G1) and 3,058,362,945 ganimals generated from blending G1 ganimals.

References

  1. ↑ Alleyne, Allyssia (25 October 2018). "AI-produced artwork sells for $433K, smashing expectations". CNN. Archived from the original on 27 January 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  2. ↑ Todorovic, Milos (2024). "AI and Heritage: A Discussion on Rethinking Heritage in a Digital World". International Journal of Cultural and Social Studies. 10 (1): 6. doi:10.46442/intjcss.1397403 . Retrieved 4 July 2024.
  3. ↑ Cohn, Gabe (22 October 2018). "Up for Bid, AI Art Signed 'Algorithm'". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 8 February 2024. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
  4. 1 2 Poli, Valentina (30 August 2018). "Christie's mette all'asta Ritratto di Edmond Belamy, opera dipinta da un'Intelligenza Artificiale" [Christie's auctions Portrait of Edmond Belamy, a work painted by an Artificial Intelligence]. Artribune (in Italian). How Does It Work. Archived from the original on 2 August 2023. Retrieved 28 May 2024.
  5. 1 2 3 Kinsella, Eileen (25 October 2018). "The First AI-Generated Portrait Ever Sold at Auction Shatters Expectations, Fetching $432,500—43 Times Its Estimate". Artnet News. Archived from the original on 17 March 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  6. 1 2 "An AI masterpiece on canvas: Obvious Art's portrait fetches $432,500 at New York auction". The Economic Times. 27 October 2018. ISSN   0013-0389. Archived from the original on 5 January 2024. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
  7. ↑ "Edmond de Belamy, from La Famille de Belamy". Christie's. Live Auction 16388. Archived from the original on 7 July 2023. Retrieved 29 October 2018.
  8. ↑ Cohn, Gabe (25 October 2018). "AI Art at Christie's Sells for $432,500". The New York Times. ISSN   0362-4331. Archived from the original on 16 May 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  9. ↑ "Andy Warhol | Myths". Whitney Museum of American Art. P.2010.340. Archived from the original on 5 December 2023. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  10. ↑ Zachariou, Renée (16 December 2018). "Machine Learning Art: An Interview With Memo Akten". Artnome (an interview article). Archived from the original on 20 April 2024. Retrieved 27 May 2024.{{cite web}}: |archive-date= / |archive-url= timestamp mismatch; 30 April 2024 suggested (help)
  11. ↑ Nugent, Ciara (20 August 2018). "How an Art Collective is Using Artificial Intelligence to Make Paintings". Time. Archived from the original on 20 March 2023.
  12. ↑ @obvious_art (20 July 2018). "We sign our artworks with the mathematical formula of the algorithms we used" . Retrieved 27 May 2024– via Instagram.
  13. ↑ Vasant, Pandian; Arefin, Mohammad Shamsul; Panchenko, Vladimir; Thomas, J. Joshua; Munapo, Elias; Weber, Gerhard-Wilhelm; Rodriguez-Aguilar, Roman (20 December 2023). Intelligent Computing and Optimization: Proceedings of the 6th International Conference on Intelligent Computing and Optimization 2023. Vol. 2 (1st ed.). Springer Nature Switzerland. p. 133. ISBN   9783031503306 . Retrieved 28 May 2024.
  14. 1 2 3 4 Vincent, James (23 October 2018). "How three French students used borrowed code to put the first AI portrait in Christie's". The Verge. Archived from the original on 4 March 2024. Retrieved 17 November 2018.
  15. ↑ Stephensen, Jan Løhmann (1 June 2019). "Towards a Philosophy of Post-creative Practices? – Reading Obvious' "Portrait of Edmond de Belamy"". Politics of the Machine Beirut 2019. Electronic Workshops in Computing. BCS Learning & Development. doi: 10.14236/ewic/POM19.4 . S2CID   210146772.
  16. ↑ "Is this art? AI-generated portrait fetches over $400,000 at auction". New Atlas. 29 October 2018. Archived from the original on 5 June 2023. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
  17. ↑ Turnbull, Amanda (6 January 2020). "The price of AI art: Has the bubble burst?". The Conversation. Archived from the original on 4 December 2023. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
  18. ↑ Barrat, Robbie [@videodrome] (25 October 2018). "Does anyone else care about this? Am I crazy for thinking that they really just used my network and are selling the results?" (Tweet). Retrieved 31 May 2024– via Twitter.
  19. ↑ Jones, Jonathan (26 October 2018). "A portrait created by AI just sold for $432,000. But is it really art?". The Guardian. ISSN   0261-3077. Archived from the original on 20 January 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  20. ↑ Hicks, Olivia (1 March 2019). "ART-ificial Intelligence: The Curious Case of Edmond De Belamy – The Isis". The Isis Magazine. Archived from the original on 2 March 2024. Retrieved 26 May 2024.
  21. ↑ Rolez, Anaïs (6 December 2018). "The Mechanical Art of Laughter". Arts. 8 (1). Nantes, France: MDPI (published 21 December 2018): 2. doi: 10.3390/arts8010002 . ISSN   2076-0752.
  22. ↑ Epstein, Ziv; Levine, Sydney; Rand, David G.; Rahwan, Iyad (25 September 2020). "Who Gets Credit for AI-Generated Art?". iScience. 23 (9). National Library of Medicine: 101515. Bibcode:2020iSci...23j1515E. doi: 10.1016/j.isci.2020.101515 . PMC   7492988 . PMID   32920489.
  23. ↑ Ray, Tiernan (18 September 2020). "People's notions about AI are terrible, an MIT study asks whether they can be helped". ZDNet. Archived from the original on 4 October 2023. Retrieved 21 September 2020.
  24. ↑ "The AI Art at Christie's Is Not What You Think". Artnome. 14 October 2018. Retrieved 16 June 2024.
  25. ↑ Elgammal, Ahmed (29 October 2018). "What the Art World Is Failing to Grasp about Christie's AI Portrait Coup". Artsy. Archived from the original on 17 May 2024. Retrieved 27 May 2024.
  26. ↑ "Will the market for AI art take off?". The Art Newspaper - International art news and events. 22 October 2018. Retrieved 16 June 2024.
This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.