The examples and perspective in this article deal primarily with the English-speaking world and do not represent a worldwide view of the subject.(September 2021) |
An election recount is a repeat tabulation of votes cast in an election that is used to determine the correctness of an initial count. Recounts will often take place if the initial vote tally during an election is extremely close. Election recounts will often result in changes in contest tallies. Errors can be found or introduced from human factors, such as transcription errors, or machine errors, such as misreads of paper ballots.
Australian elections use instant-runoff voting and single transferable vote at the federal level to determine representatives for the House of Representatives and the Senate respectively. Tabulating votes for both houses involves automatic recounts known as "fresh scrutiny." For the House, this process occurs the Monday after a general election. [1] The process in the Senate occurs shortly after the election, but only first preferences are recounted. A voter's full preferences for the Senate are not counted until after fresh scrutiny occurs. [2] Candidates for either house may also request recounts, though such a request may be refused by the Electoral Commission. [3]
Similar processes occur at the state and territorial level. [4] As in federal elections, candidates may request recounts subject to the discretion of electoral authorities. [5]
Recounts in Canadian elections are known as "judicial recounts" because a superior court judge oversees them. In federal elections, tied elections or races with a difference of 0.1% result in automatic recounts. Electors (including candidates) may also petition for recounts within four days of the final vote count under certain conditions. [6] Each province and territory has its own regulations regarding provincial or territorial elections.
Province/Territory | Automatic | Requested |
---|---|---|
Alberta | When difference is less than 100 votes [7] | Within eight days of the final tally [7] |
British Columbia | When difference is less than 0.2% (1/500th of ballots considered) [8] | Within six days of the final tally [8] |
Manitoba | When difference is less than 50 votes [9] | Within six days of the final tally [9] |
New Brunswick | None | Within four days of the final tally [10] |
Newfoundland and Labrador | When tied [11] | Within ten days of the final tally [11] |
Northwest Territories | When difference is less than 2% [12] | Within five "business days" of the final tally [12] |
Nova Scotia | When difference is less than 10 votes [13] | Within four days of the final tally [13] |
Nunavut | When difference is less than 2% [14] | Within eight days of the final tally [15] |
Ontario | When difference is less than 25 votes [16] | Within seven days of the final tally [16] |
Prince Edward Island | When difference is less than 10 votes (or 15 votes at the request of a candidate) [17] | Within five days of the final tally [17] |
Quebec | None | Within four days of the final tally, if difference is less than 0.1% (1/1000 of votes cast) [18] |
Saskatchewan | When difference is less than the number of unopened ballots [19] | Within ten days of the final tally [19] |
Yukon | When difference is less than 10 votes [20] | Within six days of the final tally [20] |
In Irish presidential elections, recounts occur only at the approval of the High Court. Candidates or the Director of Public Prosecutions may petition for a recount within seven days of the election. In the event of a recount, the High Court's decision is final. [21] An identical process is available for elections to the Oireachtas. [22]
New Zealand uses a mixed-member proportional representation system for elections to its Parliament. As in Australia, an official count takes place shortly after the election day involving a recount of all of the ballots in electorates. Judicial recounts are also available in electorate and party list races. [23] No threshold is needed for a recount to occur. [24]
In the United States recounts rarely reverse election results. Of the 4,687 statewide general elections held from 2000 to 2015, 27 were followed by a recount, and only three resulted in a change of outcome from the original count: 2004 Washington gubernatorial election, 2006 Vermont Auditor of Accounts election, and 2008 United States Senate election in Minnesota. [25] Recounts are conducted at the state level rather than the federal level, even for federal offices.
A machine recount is a retabulation of ballots cast during the election. This can be done using an optical scan voting system, punched card system or direct-recording electronic (DRE) voting machine. With document-based Ballot Voting Systems, ballots are counted a second time by some form of machine. With Non-document-based Ballot Voting Systems officials will recollect vote data from each voting machine which will be combined by a central tabulation system.
A manual or "hand" recount involves each individual physical representation of voter intent being reviewed for voter intent by one or more individuals.
With DRE voting machines, a voter-verified paper audit trail (VVPAT) is examined from each voter. For some DREs that do not generate a VVPAT, images can be printed for each ballot cast and counted individually.[ clarification needed ]
Recounts can be mandatory or optional. In some jurisdictions, recounts are mandatory in the event the difference between the top two candidates is less than a percentage of votes cast or of a fixed number. [26] Mandatory recounts are paid for by the elections official, or the state. Mandatory recounts can usually be waived by the apparent losing candidate. The winning side will usually encourage the loser to waive the recount in a show of unity and to avoid spending taxpayer money.
Each jurisdiction has different criteria for optional recounts. Some areas permit recounts for any office or measure, while others require that the margin of victory be less than a certain percentage before a recount is allowed. In all instances, optional recounts are paid for by the candidate, their political party, or, in some instances, by any interested voter. The person paying for the recount has the option to stop the recount at any time. If the recount reverses the election, the jurisdiction will then pay for the recount.
State | Automatic | Requested |
---|---|---|
Alabama | When difference is less than 0.5% | Available to both candidates and voters; an election contest must be filed if the recount changes the result |
Alaska | When tied | Available to both candidates and voters |
Arizona | When difference is less than 0.1% [27] | Not available [27] |
Arkansas | None | Available; the election commission may also initiate a recount |
California | None | Available to voters; the governor may initiate a recount if difference is less than 1,000 votes or 0.1% |
Colorado | When difference is less than 0.5% | Available |
Connecticut | When difference is less than 20 votes or less than 2000 votes when said difference is less than 0.5% | Available; election officials may initiate recounts |
Delaware | When difference is less than 1,000 votes or less than 0.5% (whichever is smaller) (municipal elections - only if difference is less than 0.5%) | Available, if difference is less than 1,000 votes or less than 0.5% (whichever is smaller); voters can initiate in school board elections only |
Florida | When difference is less than 0.5% | Available |
Georgia | None [27] | Available, if difference is less than 0.5% [27] |
Hawaii | None | Available through the Supreme Court |
Idaho | None | Available, if difference is less than 0.1% or 5 votes (whichever is larger) |
Illinois | None | Available, if difference is less than 5% (non-binding unless court-ordered); voters can initiate on ballot measures only |
Indiana | None | Available |
Iowa | None | Available, if difference is less than 1% or 50 votes (whichever is larger) |
Kansas | None | Available, if difference is less than 0.5% |
Kentucky | None | Available, unless an election for Governor, Lieutenant Governor, or General Assembly member |
Louisiana | None | Available, if difference is less than the total number of absentee and early ballots |
Maine | None | Available, if difference is less than 1.5% (legislative races) or less than 1% or 1,000 votes (whichever is smaller) (statewide races) |
Maryland | None | Available, if difference is less than 0.1% |
Massachusetts | None | Available, if difference is less than 0.5% |
Michigan | When difference is less than 2000 votes [27] | Available [27] |
Minnesota | None | Available, if difference is less than 0.25% (federal, statewide, and judicial races) or less than 0.5% (legislative races) or less than 10 votes (when total number is less than 400 votes) |
Mississippi | None | Not available |
Missouri | None | Available, if difference is less than 0.5% (state and federal races) or less than 1% (local races) |
Montana | When tied | Available, if difference less than 0.25%; state pays costs |
Nebraska | When difference is less than 1% (if more than 500 total votes) or less than 2% (if 500 total votes or less) | Available |
Nevada | None [27] | Available [27] |
New Hampshire | None | Available, if difference is less than 20% |
New Jersey | None | Available |
New Mexico | When difference is less than 0.25% (federal and statewide races) or less than 0.5% (judicial races and certain local races) or less than 1% (all other races) | Available (voters may initiate only under the Liquor Control Act) |
New York | When difference is less than 20 votes or less than 0.5% or less than 5,000 votes (if more than 1 million votes) | Available for local races only |
North Carolina | None | Available, if difference is less than 0.5% or less than 10,000 votes (whichever is less) (statewide races) or less than 1% (all other races) |
North Dakota | When difference is less than 1% (primaries) or less than 0.5% (general elections) | Available, if difference is less than 2% |
Ohio | When difference is less than 0.25% (statewide races) or less than 0.5% (all other races) | Available |
Oklahoma | None | Available |
Oregon | When difference is less than 0.2% | Available |
Pennsylvania | When difference is less than 0.5% [27] | Available [27] |
Rhode Island | None | Available (margin dependent on total number of votes cast) [28] |
South Carolina | When difference is less than 1% | Not available |
South Dakota | When tied | Available, if difference is less than 0.25% (statewide races) or less than 2% (all other races) |
Tennessee | None | Available by court order only |
Texas | When tied | Available, if difference is less than 10% |
Utah | None | Available, if difference less than 0.25% or if difference is only one (when <400 total votes were cast) |
Vermont | When tied | Available, if difference is less than 2% or less than 5% (municipal and state representative races) |
Virginia | None | Available, if difference is less than 1%; if difference is less than 0.5%, state pays costs |
Washington | When difference is less than 2,000 votes or less than 0.5% | Available |
West Virginia | None | Available |
Wisconsin | None [27] | Available; if difference is less than 0.25%, state pays costs [27] |
Wyoming | When difference is less than 1% | Available |
Source: [29]
More than one recount is allowed if a candidate or their agent requests one and the returning officer deems it appropriate. [33] It is possible for a defeated candidate denied a recount by the Returning Officer, to request one from the court by means of an election petition. There are several cases where a Parliamentary election has been the subject of a court-ordered recount.
A ballot is a device used to cast votes in an election and may be found as a piece of paper or a small ball used in voting. It was originally a small ball used to record decisions made by voters in Italy around the 16th century.
A voting machine is a machine used to record votes in an election without paper. The first voting machines were mechanical but it is increasingly more common to use electronic voting machines. Traditionally, a voting machine has been defined by its mechanism, and whether the system tallies votes at each voting location, or centrally. Voting machines should not be confused with tabulating machines, which count votes done by paper ballot.
The electoral system of Australia comprises the laws and processes used for the election of members of the Australian Parliament and is governed primarily by the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. The system presently has a number of distinctive features including compulsory enrolment; compulsory voting; majority-preferential instant-runoff voting in single-member seats to elect the lower house, the House of Representatives; and the use of the single transferable vote proportional representation system to elect the upper house, the Senate.
Electronic voting is voting that uses electronic means to either aid or take care of casting and counting ballots including voting time.
Electoral fraud, sometimes referred to as election manipulation, voter fraud, or vote rigging, involves illegal interference with the process of an election, either by increasing the vote share of a favored candidate, depressing the vote share of rival candidates, or both. It differs from but often goes hand-in-hand with voter suppression. What exactly constitutes electoral fraud varies from country to country, though the goal is often election subversion.
The Australian Electoral Commission (AEC) is the independent statutory authority and agency of the Australian Government responsible for the management of federal Australian elections, by-elections and referendums.
An electronic voting machine is a voting machine based on electronics. Two main technologies exist: optical scanning and direct recording (DRE).
Vote counting is the process of counting votes in an election. It can be done manually or by machines. In the United States, the compilation of election returns and validation of the outcome that forms the basis of the official results is called canvassing.
In the election of the United States held for government officials at the federal, state, and local levels. At the federal level, the nation's head of state, the president, is elected indirectly by the people of each state, through an Electoral College. Today, these electors almost always vote with the popular vote of their state. All members of the federal legislature, the Congress, are directly elected by the people of each state. There are many elected offices at state level, each state having at least an elective governor and legislature. There are also elected offices at the local level, in counties, cities, towns, townships, boroughs, and villages; as well as for special districts and school districts which may transcend county and municipal boundaries.
Voter verifiable paper audit trail (VVPAT) or verified paper record (VPR) is a method of providing feedback to voters who use an electronic voting system. A VVPAT allows voters to verify that their vote was cast correctly, to detect possible election fraud or malfunction, and to provide a means to audit the stored electronic results. It contains the name and party affiliation of candidates for whom the vote has been cast. While VVPAT has gained in use in the United States compared with ballotless voting systems without it, hand-marked ballots are used by a greater proportion of jurisdictions.
India has a parliamentary system as defined by its constitution, with power distributed between the union government and the states. India's democracy is the largest democracy in the world.
A group voting ticket (GVT) is a shortcut for voters in a preferential voting system, where a voter can indicate support for a list of candidates instead of marking preferences for individual candidates. For multi-member electoral divisions with single transferable voting, a group or party registers a GVT before an election with the electoral commission. When a voter selects a group or party above the line on a ballot paper, their vote is distributed according to the registered GVT for that group.
In voting, a ballot is considered spoilt, spoiled, void, null, informal, invalid or stray if a law declares or an election authority determines that it is invalid and thus not included in the vote count. This may occur accidentally or deliberately. The total number of spoilt votes in a United States election has been called the residual vote. In Australia, such votes are generally referred to as informal votes, and in Canada they are referred to as rejected votes.
A Langer vote was a style of voting in the Australian electoral system designed to avoid the requirement to express preferences for all candidates without the vote being rejected as informal. The title is a tribute to Albert Langer, an Australian political activist, who advocated for the use of this style as a de facto method of optional preferential voting for making a valid vote for the voter's preferred candidates while the deliberate "error" avoided the vote being counted for one of the major political parties.
The Court of Disputed Returns is a special jurisdiction of the High Court of Australia. The High Court, sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns, hears challenges regarding the validity of federal elections. The jurisdiction is twofold: (1) on a petition to the Court by an individual with a relevant interest or by the Australian Electoral Commission, or (2) on a reference by either house of the Commonwealth Parliament. This jurisdiction was initially established by Part XVI of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1902 and is now contained in Part XXII of the Commonwealth Electoral Act 1918. Challenges regarding the validity of state elections are heard by the supreme court of that state, sitting as that state's court of disputed returns.
Electronic voting by country varies and may include voting machines in polling places, centralized tallying of paper ballots, and internet voting. Many countries use centralized tallying. Some also use electronic voting machines in polling places. Very few use internet voting. Several countries have tried electronic approaches and stopped because of difficulties or concerns about security and reliability.
The Election Commission of Pakistan (ECP) is an independent, autonomous, permanent and constitutionally established federal body responsible for organizing and conducting elections to the national parliament, provincial legislatures, local governments, and the office of president of Pakistan, as well as the delimitation of constituencies and preparation of electoral rolls. As per the principles outlined in the Constitution of Pakistan, the Commission makes such arrangements as needed to ensure that the election is conducted honestly, justly, fairly and in accordance with law, and guard against corrupt practices. The Election Commission was formed on 23 March 1956.
On 5 April 2014, an Australian Senate special election in Western Australia was held. The special election was held six months after the 2013 Australian federal election. The result of that 2013 election for the Australian Senate in Western Australia was voided on 20 February 2014 by the High Court of Australia, sitting as the Court of Disputed Returns, because 1,375 ballot papers were lost during an official recount in November 2013. The High Court ruled that because the number of lost ballots exceeded the margin for the two remaining Senate seats, the only acceptable remedy was to void the results and hold a special election.
Section 13 of the Constitution of Australia provides for three aspects of the terms of members of the Australian Senate: the timing of elections, the commencement date of their terms and for the Senate to allocate long (six-year) and short (three-year) terms following a double dissolution of the Parliament of Australia. While members of the House of Representatives and territory senators have a maximum three-year term, state senators have a fixed six-year term, subject only to the parliament being dissolved by a double dissolution.
An election audit is any review conducted after polls close for the purpose of determining whether the votes were counted accurately or whether proper procedures were followed, or both.