Elite overproduction

Last updated
A university graduation ceremony in Ottawa, Canada (2016) University graduation (Unsplash).jpg
A university graduation ceremony in Ottawa, Canada (2016)

Elite overproduction is a concept developed by Peter Turchin that describes the condition of a society that is producing too many potential elite members relative to its ability to absorb them into the power structure. [1] [2] [3] This, he hypothesizes, is a cause for social instability, as those left out of power feel aggrieved by their relatively low socioeconomic status. [1] [2] [3]

Contents

However, Turchin's model cannot foretell precisely how a crisis will unfold; it can only yield probabilities. Turchin likened this to the accumulation of deadwood in a forest over many years, paving the way for a cataclysmic forest fire later on. It is possible to predict a massive conflagration, Turchin argues, but not what causes it. [4] Nor does it offer definitive solutions, though it can clarify the trade-offs of various options. [5] For Turchin, history suggests that non-violent end of elite overproduction is possible, citing the two decades after World War II in the United States, a time of economic redistribution and reversal of upward social mobility. [6] [5]

Overview

According to Turchin and Jack Goldstone, periods of political instability have throughout human history been due to the purely self-interested behavior of the elite. [7] When the economy faced an expansion in the workforce, which exerted a downward pressure on wages, the elite generally kept much of the wealth generated to themselves, resisting taxation and income redistribution. In the face of intensifying competition, they also sought to restrict the window of opportunity in order to preserve their power and status for their descendants. [8] These actions exacerbated inequality, a key driver of sociopolitical turbulence [8] due to the proneness of the relatively well-off to radicalism. [9] In the modern Western world, the popularity of progressive political beliefs among university graduates, for instance, may be due to widespread underemployment rather than from exposure to progressive ideas or experiences during their studies. [10] [11] Turchin has said that elite overproduction explains social disturbances during later years of various Chinese dynasties, the late Roman empire, the French Wars of Religion, and France before the Revolution. Turchin predicted in 2010 that this situation would cause social unrest in the United States during the 2020s. [12] [13]

Turchin's model also explains why polygamous societies tend to be more unstable than monogamous ones. Men of high status in a polygamous society tend to have more children and consequently produce more elites. [14]

In an essay, philosopher Francis Bacon warned of the threat of sedition if "more are bred scholars, than preferment can take off." [15] Political economist Joseph Schumpeter asserted that a liberal capitalist society contains the seeds of its own downfall as it breeds a class of intellectuals hostile to both capitalism and liberalism, though without which these intellectuals cannot exist. [16] Before Turchin, political scientist Samuel Huntington had warned about a disconnect between upward social mobility and the ability of the institutions to absorb these new individuals leading to sociopolitical decay. [17] Historian John Lewis Gaddis observed that while young people had always wanted to challenge the norms of society, by investing so much in education, major countries on both sides of the Cold War practically gave the young the tools needed to inflict upon their homelands the tumultuous period that was the late 1960s and early 1970s. [18]

Australia

In Australia, higher education continues to be promoted to young people in the 2020s. However, only around half of the wages and salaries of the Group of Eight (Go8), the oldest and most prestigious universities in the nation, went to academics (teaching and research) while many students find themselves indebted after graduation. [16]

Canada

Canada has the highest percentage of workers with higher education in the G7. However, Canada's productivity ranks lower than every other nations in this group except Japan. [19] One reason, according to the Bank of Canada, is the mismatch between skills learned at school and those demanded by the work place. [20] As a result, many new entrants to the job market find themselves either unemployed, despite being highly trained, or stuck in low-wage positions. [20] By August 2024, Canada's youth unemployment rate was 14.5%, the highest seen since 2012. [21] The Bank of Canada refers to this as an economic emergency. [19]

China

One of the factors that led to the decline and collapse of the Qing dynasty, the last of Imperial China, was the Taiping Rebellion, one of the deadliest civil wars in human history. The Rebellion was triggered by disgruntled well-educated young men, who had studied long and hard for the punishing civil-service examinations only to find themselves unable to seek lucrative government posts. The Taiping Rebellion exacerbated the other problems facing Imperial China at the time, including floods, droughts, famines, and foreign incursions. [22] [23]

In modern China, the expansion of higher education, which started in the late 1990s, was done for political rather than economic reasons. [24] By the early 2020s, Chinese youths find themselves struggling with job hunting. University education offers little help. [25] Due to the mismatch between education and the job market, those with university qualifications are more likely to be unemployed. [26] About a quarter of young Chinese prefer to work for the government rather than the private sector, and, in accordance with traditional Confucian belief, do not have a high opinion of manual labor. [26] By June 2023, China's unemployment rate for people aged 16 to 24 was about one fifth. [27]

Egypt

In 2011, as part of the Arab Spring, young Egyptians took to the streets to demand "bread, freedom, and social justice." Youth unemployment was a serious problem facing the country at the time, especially among those with at least a bachelor's degree. Young women's unemployment rate was even worse than young men's. This problem has been driven in part by Egypt's population growth. [28]

United Kingdom

In Victorian Britain, elite overproduction was overcome by outward migration, industrialization, and political reforms that gave power to a larger segment of the general public. [29]

In the modern United Kingdom, there were simply not enough working-class Britons disenchanted with the status quo to support the Brexit movement, which was also buoyed by many highly educated voters, [10] many of whom were indebted and under- or unemployed, as there were not enough jobs to match their degrees. [11] Worse, many pursued university courses that offered them little in the way of marketable skills. [30] A 2019 analysis by the Institute for Fiscal Studies suggests that a fifth of university alumni would have been better off had they not gone to university. [31] In addition, having a master's degree in certain subjects such as languages, English, sociology, history, and health actually incurs a financial loss compared to having only a bachelor's degree, and this trend is worse for men than it is for women. [31] Another reason behind the radicalization of British university graduates is the rising cost of living, including the cost of housing. [30] As the educated class moves further to the left, left-wing ideals grow in popularity. [10] [11] The United Kingdom now finds itself amid a cultural conflict revolving around issues of race, sex, and climate change. [30]

United States

In the United States, while most historians and social researchers consider the New Deal of the 1930s to be a turning point in American history, Turchin argues that from the point of view of the structural-demographic theory, it was merely a continuation of the Progressive Era (1890s to 1910s), though some trends were accelerated. [5] During this time, policies of economic redistribution were common place. [32] Taxes on high income-earners were high. [32] Many regulations were imposed on businesses. Labor unions became more powerful. Upward social mobility was reversed, as can be seen from admissions quotas (against Jews and blacks) at Ivy League institutions and the fall of the number of medical and dental schools. Concerns over social trust prompted restrictions on immigration and less tolerance for those deemed socially deviant. [5] As political scientist Robert Putnam explains, ethnic and cultural diversity has its downsides in the form of declining cultural capital, falling civic participation, lower general social trust, and greater social fragmentation. [33] For Turchin, the golden years of the 1950s mirrored the Era of Good Feelings. [5]

Turchin observed that between the 1970s and the 2020s, while the overall economy has grown, real wages for low-skilled workers have stagnated, while the costs of housing and higher education continue to climb. Popular discontent has led to urban riots, something that also happened during the years right before the Civil War. During the 1850s, the level of antagonism between the Northern industrialists and the Southern plantation owners also escalated, resulting in incidents of violence in the halls of Congress. [6]

Turchin argued that elite overproduction due to the expansion of higher education was also a factor behind the turmoil of late 1960s, the 1980s, and the 2010s. [34] By the 2010s, it became clear that the cost of higher education has ballooned over the previous three to four decades—faster than inflation, in fact—thanks to growing demand. [4] About a quarter of American university students failed to graduate within six years in the late 2010s and those who did faced diminishing wage premiums. [35] At the same time, students at elite colleges and universities increasingly hold highly left-wing views, putting them at odds with not just their peers at other institutions of higher learning but also the public at large. Progressive activism has become par for the course at the nation's top schools during this period. [34]

In his prediction that the 2020s would be politically turbulent, Turchin used current data and the structural-demographic theory, a mathematical model of how population changes affect the behavior of the state, the elite, and the commons, created by Jack Goldstone. Goldstone himself predicted using his model that in the twenty-first century, the United States would elect a national populist leader. [8] Elite overproduction has been cited as a root cause of political tension in the U.S., as so many well-educated Millennials are either unemployed, underemployed, or otherwise not achieving the high status they expect. [12] The Occupy Wall Street protest of 2011 was an example of a movement dominated by Millennials, who felt aggrieved by their relative rather than absolute economic deprivation. [36] Richard V. Reeves, a senior fellow at the Brookings Institution, wrote in his book Dream Hoarders (2017) that, "...more than a third of the demonstrators on the May Day 'Occupy' march in 2011 had annual earnings of more than $100,000. But, rather than looking up in envy and resentment, the upper middle class would do well to look at their own position compared to those falling further and further behind." [37] Political commentator David Brooks identified this "cognitive dissonance" as "the contradiction of the educated class. Virtue is defined by being anti-elite. But today’s educated class constitutes the elite, or at least a big part of it." [34]

Alumni of elite schools who take up positions in finance, consulting, or technology continue to be lucratively employed. [34] Meanwhile, the nation continued to produce excess lawyers [38] and PhD holders, especially in the humanities and social sciences, for which employment prospects were dim, even before the COVID-19 pandemic. [39] At a time of such intense intra-elite competition, evidence of corruption, such as the college admissions scandal revealed by Operation Varsity Blues, further fuels public anger and resentment, destabilizing society. [23]

According to projections by the U.S. Census Bureau, the share of people in their 20s continued to grow till the end of the 2010s, meaning the youth bulge would likely not fade away before the 2020s. [40] As such the gap between the supply and demand in the labor market would likely not fall before then, and falling or stagnant wages generate sociopolitical stress. [40] In fact, the American population was aging, making revolutions less likely. [41] And while the polarizing nature of social media can perpetuate a sense of crisis and despair, these platforms are too disjointed for a unifying figure to emerge and seize power. [41] Turchin predicted that the resolution to this crisis will occur in the 2030s and will substantially change the character of the United States. [29]

The early 2020s saw many faculty members leaving academia for good, [42] especially those from the humanities. [43] Turchin noted, however, that the U.S. was also overproducing STEM graduates. [6] Already, number of public universities have cut their STEM departments. [44]

See also

Related Research Articles

Meritocracy is the notion of a political system in which economic goods or political power are vested in individual people based on ability and talent, rather than wealth or social class. Advancement in such a system is based on performance, as measured through examination or demonstrated achievement. Although the concept of meritocracy has existed for centuries, the first known use of the term was by sociologist Alan Fox in the journal Socialist Commentary in 1956. It was then popularized by sociologist Michael Dunlop Young, who used the term in his dystopian political and satirical book The Rise of the Meritocracy in 1958. While the word was coined and popularized as a pejorative, its usage has meliorated. Today the term is often utilised to refer to social systems in which personal advancement and success primarily reflect an individual's capabilities and merits, frequently seen as equality of opportunity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Baby boomers</span> Cohort born from 1946 to 1964

Baby boomers, often shortened to boomers, are the demographic cohort preceded by the Silent Generation and followed by Generation X. The generation is often defined as people born from 1946 to 1964 during the mid-20th century baby boom. The dates, the demographic context, and the cultural identifiers may vary by country. Most baby boomers are the children of either the Greatest Generation or the Silent Generation, and are often the parents of the younger members of Generation X and Millennials. In the West, boomers' childhoods in the 1950s and 1960s had significant reforms in education, both as part of the ideological confrontation that was the Cold War, and as a continuation of the interwar period. Theirs was a time of economic prosperity and rapid technological progress. In the 1960s and 1970s, as this relatively large number of young people entered their teens and young adulthood—the oldest turned 18 in 1964, the youngest in 1982—they, and those around them, created a very specific rhetoric around their cohort, and the social movements brought about by their size in numbers, such as the counterculture of the 1960s and its backlash.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Millennials</span> Cohort born from 1981 to 1996

Millennials, also known as Generation Y or Gen Y, are the demographic cohort following Generation X and preceding Generation Z. Researchers and popular media use the early 1980s as starting birth years and the mid-1990s to early 2000s as ending birth years, with the generation typically being defined as people born from 1981 to 1996. Most Millennials are the children of Baby Boomers and older Generation X. In turn Millennials are often the parents of Generation Alpha.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Education in China</span>

Education in China is primarily managed by the state-run public education system, which falls under the Ministry of Education. All citizens must attend school for a minimum of nine years, known as nine-year compulsory education, which is funded by the government.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Elite</span> Group or class of persons enjoying superior status

In political and sociological theory, the elite are a small group of powerful people who hold a disproportionate amount of wealth, privilege, political power, or skill in a group. Defined by the Cambridge Dictionary, the "elite" are "the richest, most powerful, best-educated, or best-trained group in a society".

Social issues in China are wide-ranging, and are a combined result of Chinese economic reforms set in place in the late 1970s, the nation's political and cultural history, and an immense population. Due to the significant number of social problems that have existed throughout the country, China's government has faced difficulty in trying to remedy the issues. Many of these issues are exposed by the Chinese media, while subjects that may contain politically sensitive issues may be censored. Some academics hold that China's fragile social balance, combined with a bubble economy makes China a very unstable country, while others argue China's societal trends have created a balance to sustain itself.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Generation Z</span> Cohort born from 1997 to 2012

Generation Z, also known as Zoomers, is the demographic cohort succeeding Millennials and preceding Generation Alpha. Researchers and popular media use the mid-to-late 1990s as starting birth years and the early 2010s as ending birth years, with the generation most frequently being defined as people born from 1997 to 2012. Most members of Generation Z are the children of younger baby boomers or Generation X.

Graduate unemployment, or educated unemployment, is unemployment among people with an academic degree.

Jack A. Goldstone is an American sociologist, political scientist, and historian, specializing in studies of social movements, revolutions, political demography, and the 'Rise of the West' in world history. He is an author or editor of 13 books and over 150 research articles. He is recognized as one of the leading authorities on the study of revolutions and long-term social change.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Peter Turchin</span> American quantitative historian (born 1957)

Peter Valentinovich Turchin is a Russian-American complexity scientist, specializing in an area of study he and his colleagues developed called cliodynamics—mathematical modeling and statistical analysis of the dynamics of historical societies.

In 2023, the university enrollment rate was 60.2% according to the Ministry of Education, representing 47 million mainland Chinese students enrolled in 4-year university and college degree programs in some 3,074 Chinese tertiary institutions. Entry into universities is intended to be meritocratic in which successful entry depends only on the result of the Gaokao entrance examination. Usually, 12 years of formal education is a prerequisite for entry into an undergraduate degree. Entry is not influenced or determined by sporting activities, extracurricular programs, donations, or alumni parents and siblings. Chinese education authorities have emphasized meritocracy as a social equalizer.

Cliodynamics is a transdisciplinary area of research that integrates cultural evolution, economic history/cliometrics, macrosociology, the mathematical modeling of historical processes during the longue durée, and the construction and analysis of historical databases.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Higher education bubble in the United States</span> Economic trend

There is concern that the possible higher education bubble in the United States could have negative repercussions in the broader economy. Although college tuition payments are rising, the supply of college graduates in many fields of study is exceeding the demand for their skills, which aggravates graduate unemployment and underemployment while increasing the burden of student loan defaults on financial institutions and taxpayers. Moreover, the higher education bubble might be even more serious than load of student debts. Without safeguards in place for funding and loans, the government risks creating a moral hazard in which schools charge students expensive tuition fees without offering them marketable skills in return. The claim has generally been used to justify cuts to public higher education spending, tax cuts, or a shift of government spending towards law enforcement and national security. There is a further concern that having an excess supply of college graduates exacerbates political instability, historically linked to having a bulge in the number of young degree holders.

Political demography is the study of the relationship between politics and population change. Population change is driven by classic demographic mechanisms – birth, death, age structure, and migration.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Youth unemployment</span> Situation of young people who are willing to work but unable to find a job

Youth unemployment is a special case of unemployment with the youth, here being those between 15 and 24 years old.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Seshat (project)</span> International scientific research project

The Seshat: Global History Databank is an international scientific research project of the nonprofit Evolution Institute. Founded in 2011, the Seshat: Global History Databank gathers data into a single, large database that can be used to test scientific hypotheses. The Databank consults directly with expert scholars to code what historical societies and their environments were like in the form of accessible datapoints and thus forms a digital storehouse for data on the political and social organization of all human groups from the early modern back to the ancient and neolithic periods. The organizers of this research project contend that the mass of data then can be used to test a variety of competing hypotheses about the rise and fall of large-scale societies around the globe which may help science provide answers to global problems.

In social science, the structural-demographic theory uses mathematical modeling to explain and predict outbreaks of political instability in complex societies. It originated in the work of sociologist Jack Goldstone and has recently been developed further by the quantitative historians Peter Turchin, Andrey Korotayev, Leonid Grinin and Sergey Nefedov.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Great Resignation</span> 2021–2023 surge in job quits

The Great Resignation, also known as the Big Quit and the Great Reshuffle, was a mainly American economic trend in which employees voluntarily resigned from their jobs en masse, beginning in early 2021 during the COVID-19 pandemic. Among the most cited reasons for resigning included wage stagnation amid rising cost of living, limited opportunities for career advancement, hostile work environments, lack of benefits, inflexible remote-work policies, and long-lasting job dissatisfaction. Most likely to quit were workers in hospitality, healthcare, and education. In addition, many of the resigning workers were retiring Baby Boomers, who are one of the largest demographic cohorts in the United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Aging of the United States</span> Ongoing demographic trend

In recent decades, the fertility rate of the United States has declined below replacement level, prompting projections of an aging population and workforce, as is already happening elsewhere in the developed world and some developing countries. The decline has been most noticeable since after the Great Recession of the late 2000s. Nevertheless, the rate of aging in the United States remains slower than that seen in many other countries, including some developing ones, giving the nation a significant competitive advantage. Unintentional pregnancies have become less common; in particular, teenage pregnancies have dropped to record lows.

Millennials, also known as Generation Y, are the demographic cohort following Generation X and preceding Generation Z. The generation is typically defined as people born between 1981 and 1996.

References

  1. 1 2 "Too many Americans who perceive themselves to be elites are chasing too few positions". National Review. 2020-07-14. Retrieved 2020-08-23.
  2. 1 2 Turchin, Peter (12 November 2016). "Blame Rich, Overeducated Elites as Society Frays". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on 2019-10-13.
  3. 1 2 Turchin, Peter (2013). "Modeling Social Pressures Toward Political Instability". Cliodynamics. 4 (2). doi: 10.21237/C7clio4221333 .
  4. 1 2 Turchin, Peter (August 16, 2012). "Cliodynamics: can science decode the laws of history?". The Conversation. Retrieved September 22, 2021.
  5. 1 2 3 4 5 Rosenberg, Paul (October 1, 2016). "Breaking point: America approaching a period of disintegration, argues anthropologist Peter Turchin". Salon. Retrieved May 18, 2023.
  6. 1 2 3 Turchin, Peter (June 2, 2023). "America Is Headed Toward Collapse". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on June 7, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  7. Saadi, Sommer (4 July 2023). "Transcript: Why the Rise of 'Counter-Elites' Spells Bad News for the UK". Bloomberg News . Retrieved 28 August 2023.
  8. 1 2 3 Goldstone, Jack; Turchin, Peter (September 20, 2021). "Welcome To The 'Turbulent Twenties'". Noema. Archived from the original on 2020-09-10. Retrieved September 22, 2021.
  9. "Can too many brainy people be a dangerous thing?". The Economist. October 24, 2020. Archived from the original on September 11, 2021. Retrieved September 23, 2021.
  10. 1 2 3 Ganesh, Janan (December 1, 2020). "The real class war is within the rich". Financial Times. Retrieved September 23, 2021.
  11. 1 2 3 Heath, Allister (November 23, 2022). "The Tories now face an electoral meltdown even worse than 1997". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on November 23, 2022.
  12. 1 2 Packer, George (June 8, 2021). "How America Fractured Into Four Parts". The Atlantic. Archived from the original on 2021-06-08. Retrieved June 10, 2021.
  13. Turchin, Peter (February 3, 2010). "Political instability may be a contributor in the coming decade". Nature. 403 (7281): 608. Bibcode:2010Natur.463..608T. doi: 10.1038/463608a . PMID   20130632.
  14. Reeves, Richard V. (June 2023). "No Room at the Top". Literary Review. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
  15. Brenton, Tony (December 4, 2020). "Letter: Bacon foresaw the dangers of elite overproduction". Financial Times. Archived from the original on December 4, 2020. Retrieved April 3, 2023.
  16. 1 2 Burshtein, Dimitri; Ruddick, John (January 7, 2023). "Elite Revolt". Spectator Australia. Archived from the original on February 12, 2023. Retrieved May 18, 2023.
  17. Fukuyama, Francis (July 18, 2023). "Big Histories for the Big Future". Book Reviews. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved July 30, 2023.
  18. Gaddis, John Lewis (2005). "IV: The Emergence of Autonomy". The Cold War: A New History. Penguin Books. ISBN   978-0143038276.
  19. 1 2 Chang, Andrew (April 3, 2024). "Most educated, least productive: Why Canada's falling behind | About That". CBC News. Retrieved November 26, 2024.
  20. 1 2 Benchetrit, Jenna (April 5, 2024). "It's even harder for young people to find jobs, and the unemployment rate proves it". CBC News. Retrieved November 26, 2024.
  21. Previl, Sean (November 19, 2024). "Youth unemployment is near decade-highs. What will it take to fix it?". Global News. Retrieved November 26, 2024.
  22. Orlandi, Georg; Hoyer, Daniel; Zhao, Hongjun; Bennett, James S.; Benam, Majid; Kohn, Kathryn; Turchin, Peter (2023). "Structural-demographic analysis of the Qing Dynasty (1644–1912) collapse in China". PLOS ONE. 18 (8): e0289748. Bibcode:2023PLoSO..1889748O. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0289748 . PMC   10437944 . PMID   37595006.
  23. 1 2 Hoyer, Daniel (February 28, 2024). "History's crisis detectives: how we're using maths and data to reveal why societies collapse – and clues about the future". The Conversation. Retrieved September 4, 2024.
  24. Tong, Haoyu (July 19, 2023). "A Higher Education Bubble Stretches China's Blue-Collar Economy". The Diplomat. Archived from the original on July 21, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  25. Tsoi, Grace (June 10, 2023). "Kong Yiji: The memes that lay bare China's youth disillusionment". BBC News. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  26. 1 2 "China's young want to work. For the government". The Economist. May 31, 2023. Archived from the original on May 31, 2023. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  27. Liang, Annabelle; Marsh, Nick (July 17, 2023). "China youth unemployment hits high as recovery falters". BBC News. Retrieved July 21, 2023.
  28. Ghafar, Adel Abdel (July 27, 2016). "Educated but unemployed: The challenge facing Egypt's youth". Brookings Institution. Retrieved November 26, 2024.
  29. 1 2 Green, Dominic (July 21, 2023). "'The Fourth Turning Is Here' and 'End Times'". Books & Arts. The Wall Street Journal. Archived from the original on July 21, 2023. Retrieved July 30, 2023.
  30. 1 2 3 Cates, Miriam (July 17, 2023). "University 'elite overproduction' has shifted the UK to the Left". The Telegraph. Archived from the original on July 18, 2023. Retrieved November 17, 2024.
  31. 1 2 "Is your master's degree useless?". The Economist. Archived from the original on November 18, 2024. Retrieved November 22, 2024.
  32. 1 2 Tett, Gillian (May 31, 2023). "Trump or not, US meltdown could be inevitable". The Financial Times. Archived from the original on September 18, 2023. Retrieved November 17, 2024.
  33. Jonas, Michael (August 5, 2007). "The downside of diversity". Americas. The New York Times. Archived from the original on July 12, 2022. Retrieved September 19, 2022.
  34. 1 2 3 4 Brooks, David (June 6, 2024). "Sins of the Educated Class". The New York Times. Archived from the original on June 6, 2024. Retrieved November 17, 2024.
  35. "Covid-19 will be painful for universities, but also bring change". The Economist. August 8, 2020. Archived from the original on August 13, 2020. Retrieved December 3, 2020.
  36. Twenge, Jean (2023). "Chapter 5: Millennials". Generations: The Real Differences Between Gen Z, Millennials, Gen X and Silents—and What The Mean for America's Future. New York: Atria Books. ISBN   978-1-9821-8161-1.
  37. Reeves, Richard V. (2017). Dream Hoarders: How The American Upper Middle Class Is Leaving Everyone Else In The Dust, Why That Is A Problem, And What To Do About It. Brookings Institution. p. 7. ISBN   978-0-8157-2912-9.
  38. Turchin, Peter (December 27, 2016). "Social Instability Lies Ahead, Researcher Says". UConn Today. Retrieved September 16, 2022.
  39. Smith, Noah (January 4, 2021). "America Is Pumping Out Too Many Ph.D.s". Bloomberg. Archived from the original on January 13, 2021. Retrieved September 23, 2021.
  40. 1 2 Turchin, Peter (2013). "Modeling Social Pressures Toward Political Instability". Cliodynamics. 4 (2). doi: 10.21237/C7clio4221333 .
  41. 1 2 Marriott, James (June 10, 2023). "End Times by Peter Turchin review — prepare for revolution". The Times . Archived from the original on October 21, 2024. Retrieved October 21, 2024.
  42. Flaherty, Colleen (July 5, 2022). "Calling It Quits". Inside Higher Education. Archived from the original on July 5, 2022. Retrieved August 21, 2022.
  43. Hamilton-Honey, Emily (August 10, 2022). "The Humanities' Scholarly Infrastructure Isn't in Disarray -- It's Disappearing". Inside Higher Education. Archived from the original on August 21, 2022. Retrieved August 21, 2022.
  44. Powell, Michael (December 3, 2023). "What Happens When A Poor State Guts Its University". Education. The Atlantic. Archived from the original on December 5, 2023. Retrieved December 8, 2023.