Enver Pasha's campaign in Bukhara (1922)

Last updated

Enver Pasha's campaign in Bukhara
Part of the Basmachi movement and Enver Pasha's Rebellion
Enver Pasha's Domain in Central Asia.jpg
Enver Pasha's influence in Central Asia
DateJanuary–May 1922
Location
Result Basmachi victory
Territorial
changes
See § Result
Belligerents
Flag of Turkestan.svg Basmachi movement
Military support:
Flag of Afghanistan (1919-1921).svg  Afghanistan
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg Russian SFSR
Flag of the Bukharan People's Soviet Republic.svg Bukharan PSR
Flag of Khiva 1920-1923.svg Khorezm PSR
Commanders and leaders
Flag of Turkestan.svg Enver Pasha  (WIA)
Flag of Turkestan.svg Molla Abdulkahhar
Flag of Turkestan.svg Devletmend Beg
Flag of Turkestan.svg Ibrahim Bek [1]
Flag of Turkestan.svg Faizal Maksum
Flag of Turkestan.svg Turdu Toksab
Flag of Turkestan.svg Hurram Bek
Flag of Turkestan.svg Junaid Khan
Flag of Turkestan.svg Abdulkhai Arifov
Flag of Turkestan.svg Korşirmat
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg Leon Trotsky
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg Mikhail Frunze
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg Semyon Budyonny
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg Sergey Kamenev
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg Jēkabs Peterss
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg M. Marosin 
Flag of the Bukharan People's Soviet Republic.svg Fayzulla Xoʻjayev
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg N. Kakurin
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg P. Pavlov
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg Georges Agabekov
Flag RSFSR 1918.svg Yakov Melkumov [2]
Strength
7,000-26,000 100,000–200,000 (reserves); over 70,000 in combat
Casualties and losses
4,000 casualties

~17,000 casualties in Kerki and Termez

Other estimates (1921–1923): up to 259,000 or
%80 of the army

Enver Pasha's campaign in Bukhara or Enver Pasha's Bukhara campaign [3] [4] was a series of military engagements between the Basmachi movement, led by Enver Pasha, and Soviet forces under Mikhail Frunze and Semyon Budyonny in the Bukharan People's Soviet Republic and Khorezm People's Soviet Republic from January until the end of May in 1922.

Contents

The campaign resulted in the Basmachis temporarily gaining control over Eastern and most of Western Bukhara and Khorezm People's Soviet Republic, challenging Soviet authority in the region. Despite these significant successes, Soviet counter-offensives in June, forced the Basmachis to halt their campaign. The campaign formed part of the broader Basmachi Movement against Soviet rule in Central Asia following the Russian Civil War.

Background

By 1922, Soviet forces combined military action with political and economic control, began cutting off towns from the countryside. Food reached towns, but Basmachis and rural population suffered from famine, which weakened the Basmachis’ local support. [5]

In a 26 March 1922 letter from Mazar-i-Sharif, Ali Nazif Bey reported to Enver Pasha that Bukhara’s diplomatic envoys were seeking Afghan support while Russian troop numbers in the region were being under- and over-reported; he warned that local anti-Soviet forces under leaders such as Danyal and Jabbar were growing, that Turkmen detachments were preparing to move, and that efforts were underway to sabotage the railway lines through Merv and Çardjuy. The letter indicates Nazif’s expectation of imminent operations and his reliance on orders from Kabul. [6]

Koyenikov, the official Soviet Russian representative in Bukhara, reported to the People's Commissariat for Foreign Affairs that "the Basmachis were growing stronger and becoming organized in Eastern Bukhara, were also active in Western Bukhara, and that even the capital, Bukhara itself, was in danger." [7]

In April 1922, Soviet authorities published a report summarizing the year’s military research in Central Asia, covering topics such as the Hisar expedition, the organization of military convoys, mountain warfare, and the tactics of the Basmachi. Additional studies examined the experiences of Civil War veterans and the impact of the regional climate on operations. A second list released that September again included “The Tactics of the Basmachi,” reflecting continued Red Army focus on counterinsurgency in Turkestan. Around the same time, the Council of People’s Commissars established a scientific commission to study the social and environmental conditions of the region’s indigenous population. [8]

Bukharan Army could no longer contain the movement and, fearing the collapse of their own government, the Bukharan Council of Nazir, Fayzulla Xo'jayev approved yet another increase in Soviet troop commitment in the area. [9]

During Enver Pasha's insurgency in Turkestan, Soviet forces deployed approximately 100,000 troops to the region to combat his forces. [10] [11] [12] [13] (Other estimates range from 100,000-160,000 [14] [15] [16] [17] to 200,000 [18] ), mostly cavalry but well-equipped with artillery, armored cars and aircraft. [19]

Enver Pasha's campaign

January-February offensives

In early January, the Basmachis occupied the Karshi, Shahrisabz, and Guzar regions, opening the roads to Western Bukhara. Around the same time, Abdulkhai Arifov, the military commissioner of the Bukhara Republic, who commanded a full Bukhara cavalry squadron of 300 men, defected to the Basmachi side. [20] [21]

According to the ninth page of a report by Galib Pasha, the cities of Bukhara, Qarshi, Karmana, and Chardzhou were under Soviet control, while the remaining territories of the Emirate were held by Enver Pasha’s forces in spring. The other provinces of Bukhara were listed as Shahrisabz, Sherobod, and, in Eastern Bukhara, the cities of Termez, Dushanbe, Hisar, and Gharm. [22]

At the end of January 1922, Enver Pasha led about 200 Basmachi fighters in a successful siege on Dushanbe. During the battles of 20–22 January, Enver Pasha inflicted heavy casualties on the Russian forces. [23] [24]

The town was besieged on 28 January or 8 February. The Russians sent wireless messages requesting reinforcements from the garrisons in Tashkent, Bukhara, and Samarkand. [25] Meanwhile, a Russian cavalry detachment dispatched from Denov to relieve the Bolsheviks trapped in Dushanbe was ambushed; its soldiers were neutralized, and machine guns, rifles, and ammunition were captured. [26]

On 7 February, the Soviets suffered over 100 casualties. The Basmachis captured a machine gun, along with numerous rifles and ammunition. Seventy-two Russian troops defected and joined the Basmachis. [24]

By 14 February, during a smoky and snowy night, the town was completely captured, and Enver pursued the retreating Russian forces toward Mirtyube. His troops seized 120 rifles, two machine guns, and inflicted around 100 casualties on the Russian garrison, while 88 soldiers defected to his side. [27] [28] According to Cemal Kutay, the Russian commander in Dushanbe, Mazarof reported that Enver Pasha had organized a strong resistance movement with increasing local support, inflicting heavy losses on Russian forces and compelling them to contemplate abandoning the city. However, Kutay regards this account as unreliable. [23] [24] Between 28 January and 22 February, Enver Pasha’s forces, numbering around 1,500 men, captured Sariosiyo, Qubodiyon, Yurchi, and Denov against a Soviet force estimated at 7,000 to 8,000 troops. During the engagement, the Russians suffered significant losses, leaving behind their supplies, ammunition, five machine guns, two cannons, and hundreds of rifles. A number of Russian soldiers defected and joined the Basmachi forces. [29] [30] [31] [32] [33] [34] While fighting near Sariosiyo on 19 February, Enver Pasha was wounded. [35] [36]

These victory increased Enver’s reputation across Central Asia and enhanced his prestige in the Islamic world. [37] [38] In February, Enver was warned of an impending Russian attack and withdrew to Kofarnihon. [27]

Unrest in Dagestan

Enver’s successful gains in Bukhara began to spread to Dagestan, where signs of unrest had already emerged. In response to the armed detachments of N. Gotsinsky, the Soviet authorities established the Republican Military Council for Combating Banditry in Dagestan on January 30, 1922. By August 1922, the situation had escalated to the point that Dagestan was placed under martial law. [39] [40] [41] [42]

In early 1922, Soviet authorities warned that the situation in Dagestan was critical. A telegram from March 1922 described a surge in “banditism,” growing anti-Soviet agitation led by mullahs and “Turkish emissaries,” and feared that the uprising was spreading into Dagestan. [43]

In the same year, Gotsinsky’s associates sought international recognition from the League of Nations for a future independent Caucasian state, citing solidarity with broader Muslim resistance movements. [42]

March-April offensives

Due to these successes, on 28 March 1922, Enver Pasha was declared commander of all forces in Eastern Bukhara by a decree from Amir Alim Khan. [44] [45]

According to the Commander-in-Chief of the British forces in India, reporting to the War Office on 10 May 1922, unrest broke out in Askabad region in March, in which the Zaloni bazaar was looted. Troops were dispatched but later withdrawn once order was restored. [21] Meanwhile, Termez remained under rebel siege, and the Bolsheviks sent reinforcements from Kerki. [21]

In mid-March, Basmachis besieged Termez and on the same day, they captured Margilan, while heavy fighting occurred in the Kokand region, damaging nearby oil wells. Approximately 2,500 Bolshevik soldiers deserted—taking four machine guns with them—and joined the insurgents. In Tashkent, the 14th Uzbek Regiment also defected en masse, bringing weapons and ammunition. [21] The railway north of Tashkent was repeatedly cut as the Basmachi movement spread further across the region. Bolshevik reinforcements were dispatched to Kerki, while a growing number of deserters fled into Persia. [46] [21]

On 25 March, a battle broke out at Qarsang, during which 245 Russian troops were killed and three machine guns were captured by Enver Pasha’s forces. In the Tal village inside Boysun, over the course of 3 days, approximately 400 Russian troops—supported by two artillery pieces and four machine guns—attacked the outposts but were eventually repelled, leaving around 80 dead before withdrawing. As a result, Kulob, Darvaz, Karategin, Baljuvon, and Qurghonteppa came completely under Enver Pasha’s control. [47] [48]

A. Nagornov, the Consul General in Bukhara, sent a report on 2 April 1922 describing the loss of Soviet control in Eastern Bukhara, and the negative effect and will probably have an even greater impact on the country’s food resources in the near future. [49]

In spring 1922, Leon Trotsky personally took charge of operations against the Basmachis and traveled to Fergana. The Basmachis then engaged in brutal combat; after liberating villages, they executed all Soviet officials, especially commissars. [50] At that time, Basmachis laid a siege on Kerki. [51] [52]

On 13 April 1922, Ruz Muhammed Bek and a unit of Basmachis arrived at Enver Pasha’s headquarters, bringing him a horse, a bird, a chest, and a letter from Korşirmat. [53]

On 20 April 1922, Joseph Stalin, then serving as Secretary of the Central Committee, sent a classified telegram to Sergo Ordzhonikidze instructing him to travel from Tiflis to Tashkent to assess the situation on the Turkestan Front. Stalin ordered an immediate investigation into the Basmachi uprising in Fergana and Bukhara, directing Ordzhonikidze to determine whether native units were supplying insurgents with arms, whether local authorities were obstructing military operations, and whether the composition of the Turkfront, Turkburo, or Turkestan Commission required reorganization. The telegram also mandated the introduction of martial law in Bukhara and Turkestan and requested detailed recommendations on measures to suppress the revolt and restore control. [54] Ordzhonikidze was also given the task of ascertaining “how great is the danger of [losing] Bukhara and Ferghana.” [55]

The Soviet forces suffered heavy casualties and severe attrition from disease, exhaustion, and the harsh climate while combating the Basmachi insurgents. Shortages of food, water, and medical supplies, compounded by continuous attacks from the Basmachi, left the troops in a critical condition. In a report to the Turkestan Front headquarters, the commander Vladimir Martynovsky stated: [56]

“Diseases and exhaustion disabled 80% of personnel. Dozens of Red Army soldiers were killed or wounded. Breaking out from the dense encirclement is practically impossible.”

May offensives

In May 1922, after receiving military aid from Afghanistan—including 800 soldiers, 100 British rifles, and 80 camel-loads of ammunition. [57] [58] [59] [60] [61] [62] Enver Pasha mobilized from his headquarters in the Kafirun region with approximately 3,000 to 20,000 Basmachi fighters under his command. [note 1]

On 11 May, the Basmachis attacked the city of Karmana. After heavy fighting, however, they were forced to withdraw. [63] The following day, G. K. Ordzhonikidze arrived in Bukhara from Tashkent and sharply criticized the hesitant policies of the Bukharan satellite government. [64] Soviet envoy Shalva Eliava reported to Joseph Stalin that Eastern Bukhara was effectively in open revolt under Enver Pasha’s leadership and urged that Enver’s elimination was essential to restoring control. [65]

On 13 May, Enver launched a broad offensive, taking Saraykemer, Samarkand, Bukhara, Yarkand, Kashgar and most of the city of Boysun under his possession. [66] [67] [68] [14] [69] [70] [71] In 1922, multiple reports described Enver’s growing power in Bukhara. A detailed report submitted to Galip Pasha, appointed as the Ottoman representative to Bukhara, confirmed that more than half of the territory of the Emirate of Bukhara was under Enver’s military control, rather than Soviet authority. [72]

At 23:00 on 14 May, Stalin warned Ordzhonikidze in Tashkent about Enver's operatives and leftist elements in a coded telegram. Along with criticizing Eliava's assessment of Bukhara, Stalin stressed the need for combining military occupation with political concessions, particularly regarding the return of waqf lands, and urged measures against disruptive factions. [73]

On 29 May, According to Colonel Humphrys, the British diplomatic representative in Kabul, reporting to Lord Curzon on Enver had recently inflicted a heavy defeat on General Budyonny, who commanded about 50,000 men. [74] [75] [76] [77] [78]

According to The New York Herald report of July 29, by the end of May Enver Pasha had launched offensives from Bukhara toward Tashkent, Kokand, Khujand, and Naryn. As a result, he held a line extending from Tashkent to Khujand and eastward through Kokand to Naryn, threatening both Tashkent and the Krasnovodsk railway. [67] [68]

Aftermath

During this campaign, sown areas in Bukhara were reduced by 72 percent, and livestock numbers fell by two-thirds. [79] By early 1922, Enver had already seized much of the Bukharan People’s Soviet Republic and attracted several Jadid reformers, former collaborators of the Soviet regime, to his cause. [80]

Later that month, Basmachi strength around Samarkand was such that when Eliava and Ordzhonikidze could visit Ulug Bek's Observatory only under heavy guard. [81] When Enver's forces controlled the entire eastern part of Bukhara, the Soviet officials viewed the situation as politically more dangerous than the military successes achieved by Enver. [82] [83]

Soviet attempts to pacify the Basmachis failed. (RGASPI, f. 17, op. 84, d. 356, l. 70) RGASPI document on Basmachi movement, 1922.jpg
Soviet attempts to pacify the Basmachis failed. (RGASPI, f. 17, op. 84, d. 356, l. 70)

Bolshevik response

In response to Enver's victories, the Bukhara Group of Troops was formed from units drawn from the Moscow Military District and Belarus, totaling 4,500 rifles, 3,030 sabers, and 20 artillery pieces. [84] [85]

On 20 April, 20,000 troops from Samarkand and Chardzhou were directed toward Kogon, on the Kizilsu–Tashkent railway, 8,000 of whom were sent to Qarshi. [63]

For the direct command of military operations in the region, RKKA commander S.S. Kamenev and Chekist Ya.Kh. Peters were sent to purge the Bukharan party, military, and militia of Pan-Turkist and Pan-Islamist elements. [86]

Under the Turkestan Front, commanded by N. Kakurin and P. Pavlov, Soviet authorities organized two Cavalry Brigades, two cavalry squadrons, and one rifle division, comprising roughly 7,500–8,000 soldiers with 20 machine guns. [86] Peters, a veteran Russian revolutionary and one of the first commanders of the Communist Party, along with Kamenev, oversaw operations against Enver in Bukhara. [64] [86] A squadron of four aircraft—two Nieuport fighters and two 1½-Strutters—was deployed to southern Bukhara to provide air support against Basmachis. [87] The Soviets also purchased about 24 LVG VI reconnaissance planes from Germany, the majority of which were sent to the Central Asian front. [88]

Enver's reforms

During this period, the Basmachi movement also became more centralized; regular meetings were held among the leaders of Khiva, Bukhara, and Fergana. [89] [90] He established a unified army in Bukhara, implemented a Western-style chain of command, and incorporated Turkish officers into his ranks. [91] [90] [92] He also regularized contact with the Afghans. [90]

Enver also decided to unify his forces under a single uniform. He informed Hacı Sami in Afghanistan, and through Amanullah Khan’s foster brother Ahmet Khan, he received khaki uniforms and lambskin hats made from Karagöl pelts. Because boots were scarce, local craftsmen produced light, upturned shoes modeled after Anatolian footwear. [93] [94]

Peace attempts

As a last resort, the Soviet government summoned Fayzulla Xoʻjayev, the highly trusted head of the Bukharan Government, to Moscow, and through him, they offered a truce to Enver Pasha. [81] [95] [96] [97] The Soviets, through an eleven-member delegation sent from Kazan, proposed granting Enver Pasha broad concessions in nearly all matters and urged him to reach an agreement. In response, Enver convened the National Pact Congress. [98] However, Enver's reply was uncompromising: [81]

"Peace is only acceptable after the withdrawal of Russian troops from Turkestan soil."

As a result of the negotiations, the Soviet offer was rejected, even though Togan urged Enver to accept the peace as he had received news from Moscow that the Soviet government intended to send 100,000 additional troops to Turkestan if they refused. [81] The National Pact of Congress consequently issued a decision for full independence. [99] Enver himself remained optimistic; hoping for better days, the headquarters was later moved from Pulluhakiyan to Kafirun.

Casualties

According to the Central Asia Information Bureau, Soviet losses in Termez and Kerki totaled 17,000 men(Turlybek, 2013, p. 366) News of the Central Asia Information Bureau.png
According to the Central Asia Information Bureau, Soviet losses in Termez and Kerki totaled 17,000 men(Turlybek, 2013, p. 366)

Total Soviet casualties were reported at around 17,000 in Termez and Kerki alone, [100] though some sources claim figures as high as 259,000—an exaggerated number. [101] [102] Other estimates suggest losses reached up to 80% of the forces in the region. [103] Total Basmachi casualties were reported as approximately 4,000 by Krugosvet encyclopedia. [104] According to Soviet intelligence, Basmachi strength declined from 26,000 fighters in May to 6,700 fighters in October 1922. [105]

Result

A report from the chairman of the commission, dated August 7, Sokolnikov, acknowledged that after four years of struggle, the Bolsheviks had failed to eliminate the Basmachi. Instead, the insurgency had expanded across Samarkand, parts of Syr-Darya, and Turkmen oblasts—becoming a widespread regional revolt and a major embarrassment for Soviet authority in Turkestan. [106] [107]

As a result of Basmachi successes, they regained control over all of Eastern Bukhara, most of Western Bukhara, and the entire Fergana Valley. [108] [109] [110] [69] [111] [52] [112] [89] [113] [91] [114] [115]

Molla Abdulkahhar's campaign

Background

In Western Bukhara, the Basmachi movement was also gaining strength, and by late 1921, all the provinces of the region were administered by Abdulkahhar and Faizul Makhdum. [116] [117] Their growing influence increased local recruitment and drew more volunteers into joining the Basmachis. During this period, Abdulkahhar established communication with Amir Alim Khan in Afghanistan, Lakay Ibrahim, and Enver Pasha in Bukhara. According to Amir Alim Khan, Abdulkahhar’s army was reinforced by 6,000 men around Bukhara, 2,000 from Vabkent, 2,000 from Qiziltepa, 2,000 from Shofirkon, 2,500 from Romitan and Peshku, and 2,000 from Kogon district. [118]

Bukhara offensive

Following his operations toward Bukhara, [37] [119] Abdulkahhar captured the districts of Gijduvon, Shofirkon, Vabkent, Romitan, and Nurata. In March 1922, he launched a major offensive against Bukhara, seizing most of the city and advancing toward Kogon, a key railway junction about 12.8 km (12 versts) from old Bukhara. [120] Abdulkahhar also seized the Baha' al-Din Naqshband shrine, the resting place of the founder of the Naqshbandi Sufi Order. [121] The Red Army suffered defeat near the Mehta Qasim Bridge over the Zarafshan River. [122] To protect their supply lines to Bukhara, the Soviet command dispatched cavalry from Samarkand, Budyonny's forces from the Trans-Caspian front, and additional troops from Tashkent, the Fergana Valley, and Central Turkestan. [123] In total, the Soviets sent about 12,000 additional troops and several armored trains to Bukhara. [124] [125] Overall, the campaign resulted in heavy casualties against the Bolsheviks. [126]

Junaid Khan's campaign

Background

In November 1921, Junaid Khan signed a peace agreement with the Khorezm Republic, while waiting for an opportune moment to seize control of Khorezm. [127] He commanded about 15,000 men in 1922, [128] [129] although this figure might have been exaggerated, as estimates vary. [130] In early months of 1922 during the height of the Basmachi movement, Enver Pasha sent convoys and letters to Junaid Khan who was offering strong resistance to the Bolsheviks in the Karakum desert. [131] [132] Several Turkmen tribes also joined Junaid khan, who also held the title of "Commander of the Army of Islam" alongside Enver Pasha. [128] [133] As a result, the territory under Khivan Basmachi control expanded significantly. [131]

Khiva offensive

In April 1922, Junaid Khan captured the Boldumsaz District. [134] On April 12, he attacked the Chovdur tribes, who were allied with Soviets, inflicting heavy casualties. [135]

In 1922, Basmachi uprisings broke out against the Soviet government in Khiva, where the Soviets suffered a heavy defeat against Junaid Khan and Abdulkahhar in Khiva. [136] [39] [137] This enabled Junaid Khan to seize control of Khorezm. [52] [114] [138] [139] However, due to increase of Soviet dispatch in the area, a portion of his troops began negotiations with the Red Army, and about 150 Basmachis eventually surrendered. [140]

Congress of Kafirun

On 9 April, Enver circulated a nine-point directive to Basmachi units calling for internal unity, strict discipline, and coordinated operations: he asked fighters to settle local disputes, unite under a single banner, cut Soviet supply lines through raids, build effective intelligence networks, and send delegations to the congress planned after 10 April. [141]

While touring the southern front of Boysun, Enver and his men passed through the village of Kafirun, located about 2 km away. [142] On 15 April 1922, an enormous crowd gathered under the command of their headquarters. For the council scheduled that day, nearly one hundred Basmachis from across Turkestan assembled, accompanied by approximately 3,000 armed fighters united under the Enver Pasha's banner for a common ideal. [143]

Precisely at eight o’clock, Enver Pasha—accompanied by Chief of Staff Hasan Bey, Afghan Captain Afzaleddin, and Afghan volunteers under the command of Ahmet Khan—stood before the assembled commanders to address them in Ottoman Turkish: [144]

"«ای ترکستانِ مُجاهدلَرِنین قهرمانلاری! سیزلَر بو گؤزل و مُثِلْسِز وطنِیْنینیزی، یِت(?) ییل دیر آنونُ مُردَر چِیزمَه‌لَری ایله قَدیْمَلی‌یان روس‌لاردان آزاد ائتمک اُچون بورادا توپلانمیش سیز. قدَرین چِلْوَسی ایله بیز، باشقا بیر مملکتده دوغولوب بِیوُمُوش افغان گؤنُلُلوَر ایله تقدیرینیزده شریک اولوروز.

بِن و ضابطانیم حُضورونوزدا واعده ائدیریم کی، بو مقدّراتا شریک اولماغ‌دان پِشیمانلیق حسِی اِتمِیرم. سون نفَسیمَغَه قَدَر بو دَوا اوچون چالیشاجام. اینجا وردیغیم یَمینی شَرَفْینِیز ایله تَصْدِیق ائدِمَنِیزی طلب ائدیرم.»"

English Translation:

"O heroes of Turkestan’s mujahideen, you have gathered here to liberate your beautiful and unparalleled homeland from the Russians, who for seventy years have trampled it under their filthy boots. By the twists of fate, we, born in another land, and the Afghan volunteers share in your destiny. On behalf of myself and my fellow officers, I promise before you that I do not regret sharing in your fate. I will work for this cause until my last breath. I ask that you, in turn, endorse the pledge I make here with your honor."

In response, all the Basmachis affirmed the Kafirun decisions, declaring: "We pledge on our honor!" [145]

Territories of The Turkestan Provisional Government Turkestan Provisional Government.png
Territories of The Turkestan Provisional Government

Decisions of the Congress and creation of The Turkestan Provisional Government

Following the congress, the Turkestan Provisional Government was established, outlining a comprehensive military and administrative framework for territories of Eastern Bukhara cleared of Soviet control. The resolutions called for the formation of regular forces under provincial commanders (leshkerbashis), the mobilization of new uprisings in remaining regions, and the creation of local governments in liberated areas. Funding was to be secured through zakat, tributes, or additional taxes based on wealth, managed by appointed collectors. The decrees regulated logistics, reporting, and inter-provincial coordination, ordering daily communication with central command and mutual military assistance during emergencies. They also instructed forces to sabotage Soviet infrastructure, suppress espionage, and treat prisoners humanely. Ultimate authority over all political and military operations was vested in Enver Pasha. [146] [147]

In accordance with the decisions made at the Congress of Kafirun on 15 April 1922, Enver Pasha established local and civil administrations in the liberated areas and stationed a portion of his troops in the mentioned locations to maintain control and security. [148] [149] [150] The same congress also proclaimed Turkestan Provisional Government ), headquartered in Samarkand. [3] They declared a constitution consisting of 7 sections and 36 articles. [151] [152] Osman hoca was appointed President of Bukhara, while Shir Muhammad Bek, commander-in-chief of the Islamic Armies, was elected as the president. [90] [97] [153] Abdul hamid as named minister of War, and Ali Riza served as Deputy Minister of War. [154] [155] The new state was founded on the principles of private property and governance under Shari'a law. [90]

The government established by Shir Muhammad Bek relocated its center five times within three months, moving successively between Samarkand, Namangan, Osh, Margilan, and Naryn. [156] [157] The Kafirun Congress, attended by representatives including Cora Hoca from Kabul, resolved to organize regular military units in liberated areas of Eastern Bukhara, prepare local populations for combat, appoint commanders to lead revolutionary actions in each region, and levy taxes if resources were insufficient. [136]

The congress consisted of sixteen resolutions, the last of which granted Enver Pasha full authority over all military and political affairs. He was formally presented with a seal inscribed: [136] "Damad-ı Halifet’ül Müslimin, Emir-i Leşker-i İslâm Seyyid Enver" (Son-in-law of the Caliph of the Muslims, Commander of the Islamic Army, Seyyid Enver")

symbolizing his authority and consolidating the support of the national movement's command. [158] [147]

enver's hand-drawn map of Turkestan published in "sarki buhara vekazi'i" liva-el-Islam 2 no 11-12 1 August 1922 49 Map of turkestan 1 august 1922.webp
enver's hand-drawn map of Turkestan published in “şarkı buhara vekazı’i” liva-el-Islam 2 no 11-12 1 August 1922 49

Second peace attempts

Around the same time, through Nariman Narimanov, Chairman of the Council of People’s Commissars of the Azerbaijan Republic, Enver Pasha sent an ultimatum to Moscow, demanding the withdrawal of Soviet troops from Turkestan. On 30 March 1922, the Soviet administration established a new front in Bukhara against the Basmachi, along with a special operations staff. Special brigades were organized in Samarkand and sent to Bukhara. [159]

Meanwhile, Enver continued to pursue his objectives. On 18 May 1922, the Central Committee discussed the “Turkestan–Bukhara issue” and issued a decree initiating a broad political campaign against him, while also dispatching military reinforcements to the Bukharan People's Soviet Republic. [85] [160]

On 19 May 1922, Enver sent a ultimatum to the Soviet government, again demanding that the Red Army withdraw from Turkestan,Bukhara, and Khiva within 14-15 days. The demand was rejected by the Soviet authorities. [160] [161] [162] [163] [164]

As a response to the ultimatum, the Soviet government issued a brief declaration: "“Enver Pasha is an agent of British imperialism." [165] [166]

Following this, the Soviet government reinforced its forces in the region and established an extensive espionage network, which was placed under the direct leadership of Georges Agabekov. [165]

Aftermath

By early June, insurgents under Enver Pasha advanced from Boysun, capturing Bolshevik positions at Chashma and Hazifan. By 6 June, Soviet forces in the region were estimated at around 70,000, including 4,500 in Tashkent, 10,000 in Fergana, 5,000 in Semirechye, 7,000 in Khiva, 1,000 between Kizilsu and Ashkabad, 4,000 in Ashkabad, 3,000 between Ashkabad and Merv, 10,000 between Merv and Kushk, 3,500 in Chardzhou, 7,000 in the KerkiTermez sector, and 15,000 along the KogonKarshiSamarkand line. [167] [168]

The Basmachis entered Termez on 8 June but were pushed back after Soviet reinforcements arrived. Fighting continued in the surrounding area for twelve days, with heavy losses on both sides, including the death of Russian military commissar M. Marosin. [169] Enver's forces also captured Sherobod, inflicting heavy casualties on the Bolsheviks and prompting additional Soviet reinforcements to be sent. [63] Meanwhile, the Soviets transferred large numbers of troops to Turkestan via Kizilsu from the Caucasus and through the Orenburg railway, concentrating them around Kushk and partly in Bukhara, aiming to deter Afghanistan from supporting Enver Pasha. [63]

On 10 June 1922, the Soviets launched a new campaign against Enver, describing him as "the most evil enemy of Soviet power and defender of the interests of the manaps." [170] At that day, Enver Pasha successfully defended Qoʻrgʻontepa and won a battle in Argamchi. [171]

Due to the deteriorating situation in Turkestan, Yakov Melkumov, commander of the 2nd Turkestan Cavalry Brigade, was dispatched to lead operations against the Basmachi movement.

On 21 June, Enver Pasha engaged with the Bolshevik forces to the west of Samarkand. His troops achieved a decisive victory, reportedly destroying two Red Army divisions. [172] [173] [70]

At the end of June, Enver Pasha attacked a bridgehead on the Surxondaryo River, defended by a battalion of the 5th Rifle Regiment. Several assaults led by Enver were repelled, and by 29 June, the entire regiment, supported by artillery, crossed the river and outflanked his forces. After an intense battle in which the Basmachis lost 165 men, Enver retreated. [174] [175] The Red Army pursued Enver in two columns—one to seal the Afghan frontier and the other to envelop him from the north and expel him from the Hisar Valley. [176]

In July 1922, the forces of Faizal Maksum, supporters of Enver Pasha, were disarmed by the Basmachi in Karategin under the leadership of Ishan Sultan. [177] On 7 July, a Basmachi assassination attempt on the life of Fayzulla Xoʻjayev failed. [64] [178]

During the same year and into the following one, the government of the Bukharan People’s Soviet Republic dismissed all Ottoman prisoners of war working in Bukhara as teachers, officially accusing them of provoking factionalism in the country and supporting Enver’s actions. [179] [180] [181] [182]

Notes

  1. Estimates vary widely, see below.

Some Soviet writers even claimed that Mikhail Frunze faced **40,000** in Bukhara (Tsentralnaya Aziya i Zakavkaz'ye: Istoriya i Sovremennost’, p. 64), but this figure is considered exaggerated and logistically impossible by Robert F. Baumann (p.121).

References

  1. Until late spring or June
  2. Only in June
  3. 1 2 Fraser 1987b, p. 42.
  4. Hiro 2011, p. 42.
  5. Shalinsky 1982, p. 74.
  6. Yamauchi 1995a, pp. 267–268.
  7. Hayit 2018a, p. 208.
  8. Lageard 1987a, p. 20.
  9. David 1992a, p. 220.
  10. Hayit 2001a, p. 230.
  11. Kara 2011, p. 133.
  12. Bardakçı 2015a, p. 349.
  13. Mould 2016b, p. 49.
  14. 1 2 Dixon 2016c, p. 473.
  15. Broxup 2007b, p. 6.
  16. Baumann 1993a, p. 100.
  17. Jowett 2022b, p. 6.
  18. Bademci 2019a, p. 314.
  19. Fraser 1987c, p. 16.
  20. Ю.А 1976, pp. 94–95.
  21. 1 2 3 4 5 Sonyel 1990a, p. 54.
  22. BCA (Başbakanlık Cumhuriyet Arşivi), 23 August 1922, File: 431 II, Fund Code: 30.10.0.0, Location No: 247.671.11
  23. 1 2 Kutay 1955, p. 55.
  24. 1 2 3 Gürsoy 2007c, p. 362.
  25. Cebesoy 2017a, p. 331.
  26. Bademci 2015d, p. 131, Düşenbe'de sıkışan Bolşevikler'e imdat için Dihnev'den gön-derilen bir bölük Rus süvârisi pusuya düşürüldü. Askerleri tesirsiz hale getirilerek, mitralyöz, tüfek ve cephane ganimetleri elde edildi. Gün geçtikçe işler ciddileşiyordu..
  27. 1 2 "Central Asian Review, Vol. VII, 1959 (Index and Articles)" (PDF). Central Asian Review. 7: 244. 1959.
  28. Kara 2011, p. 128, Enver Paşa bu saldırıda 180 tüfek 2 mitralyöz ele geçirmiş 100 Rus askeri öldürülmüştür. Dahası Enver Paşa'ya 82 Basmacı daha katılacaktır.
  29. texte, France Ministère de la guerre (1791-1936) Auteur du; texte, France Ministère des affaires étrangères (1588-2007) Auteur du (1922-06-01). "Bulletin périodique de la presse russe". Gallica. Retrieved 2025-11-03.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  30. Gümüş 2015e, p. 673.
  31. İdil 2013, p. 169.
  32. İnan 1997, p. 118.
  33. Yamauchi 1995a, pp. 262, Düşen-be'den çıkan Rusları ta'kîben Mortebe, Şorab, Nevabad-Noda, Seşme, Sarıasıya, An-barsay-yarı, Mirşadi'de Rusları vurduk. Kendilerinde 50'dan ziyâde ölü vardır. Bir o ka-dar da yaralı. Araba ve at elimize düştü ... Ruslar yalnız Şehrisebz, Guzar, Karşi'de kalmıştır. Şehirlerden çıkmamaktadırlar..
  34. Kara 2011, p. 128, Cenab-ı Allah'ın yardımıyla düşman-ı din olan Bolşevikle-ri Duşanbe, Yürci, Seriasyab, Dihnev, Kabadiyan şehirlerinden çıkardık. Duşanbe ve Kabadiyan müstesna bu şehirleri düşman harpsiz tahliye etmiştir. Bolşevik kuvvetlerinin kısm-ı külli'si Baysun garnizonunda bulunuyor. Buna mukabil Darvaz, Baba-dağ, Karadağ, Dihnev, Cilligöl askerlerinden müteşekkil kuv-vetlerimiz Baysun şehrini muhasara etmiş bulunmaktadır. Bu şehirde muharebe devam etmektedir.
  35. Kandemir 1955b, p. 32, 19 Şubatta (Seriasya) civarında Ruslarla tekrar çarpışan Enver Paşa, bir nefer gibi ilk saflara atıldığından, yaralandı. Fakat yaraşma aldırmadan yine cenge devam etti..
  36. Gürsoy 2007c, p. 363.
  37. 1 2 Fraser 1987b, p. 58.
  38. Wheeler, Geoffrey. "Central Asian Review". Central Asian Review . 4: 175 via Pahar. preference of Indian Muslims the question arose as to who was in fact to command the Indian army once India had won her independence, the almost unanimous answer was heard: Of course, 'Enver Pasha!'.
  39. 1 2 Kara 2011, p. 132.
  40. Kutay 1955, pp. 60–61.
  41. Исалабдулаев 2016e, p. 62, Для борьбы с отрядами Н. Гоцинского 30 января 1922 г. в Дагестане было образовано Республиканское военное совещание по борьбе с бандитизмом. В августе 1922 г. Дагестан был объявлен на военном положении..
  42. 1 2 Donogo 2008d, p. 137.
  43. Donogo 2008d, pp. 136–137.
  44. Yalvar 2017c, p. 230.
  45. Hatunoğlu 2016a, p. 322.
  46. FO 371/8074/N 4613. Kew, London: The National Archives (UK).
  47. Yamauchi 1995a, pp. 268–269.
  48. Cebesoy 2017a, p. 333.
  49. RGASPI,f.544,op.4,d.29,l12-13
  50. Hayit 1956a, p. 186.
  51. Karpov 2018c, p. 57.
  52. 1 2 3 Castagné 1925d, p. 51.
  53. Bademci 2008b, pp. 145–147.
  54. RGASPI,f.558,op.11,d.29,l.15-16
  55. RGASPI, f. 62, op. 2, d. 88, l. 111–111ob
  56. "Тайная сделка советской власти с главным "басмачом" Средней Азии". BBC News Русская служба (in Russian). Retrieved 2025-10-31. Начальник Душанбинского гарнизона Владимир Мартыновский в донесении штабу Туркестанского фронта сообщал о критическом положении, в котором оказались красноармейцы, и просил скорейшей помощи: "Болезни и истощение вывели из строя 80% личного состава. Десятки красноармейцев убиты и ранены. Осуществить прорыв из плотного кольца окружения практически невозможно".
  57. Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History (RGASPI), f. 62, op. 2, d. 5, l. 231.
  58. KC MDA, Fund No. 2225, Record No. 2, File No. 45, pp. 115–120.
  59. Bardakçı 2016, p. 546.
  60. Özdemir 2007, p. 278.
  61. Baysun 2001a, p. 65.
  62. These numbers are disputed. According to a report from Nabi Baksh, Enver received only 150 rifles and ten boxes of ammunition (British Library, India Office Records (IOR), Political and Secret Department, File 1919/57: Statement by Nabi Baksh, 13 December 1923). Another account claims that General Nadir Khan sent Enver 60,000 rupees and 300 armed men to serve as a guard, together with a limited supply of cartridges, but Enver refused the 300 men, frustrated that the two artillery pieces he had requested were not provided by the Amir (British Library, India Office Records (IOR), Political and Secret Department, File 1919/57: Statement by Sayyid Ibadulla, 27 February 1923).
  63. 1 2 3 4 Sonyel 1990a, p. 58.
  64. 1 2 3 Rywkin 1990a, p. 39.
  65. RGASPI. F. 2, op. 1, d. 23181, l. 2.
  66. texte, France Ministère de la guerre (1791-1936) Auteur du; texte, France Ministère des affaires étrangères (1588-2007) Auteur du (1922-06-01). "Bulletin périodique de la presse russe". Gallica. Retrieved 2025-11-03.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: numeric names: authors list (link)
  67. 1 2 "Enver Pasha as Emir of Turkestan". Current History (1916-1940). 16 (6): 951–952. 1922. ISSN   2641-080X.
  68. 1 2 "Islamism threatens to drive out reds" (PDF). 29 July 1922. ...by the end of May [he] started a double offensive northeast from Bokhara, which he had captured by a brilliant coup de main, toward Tashkent and northeast from Hisar to Khokand ... and now holds loosely the line from Tashkent down to Khojent and eastward through Kokand to Naryn, whence he is sending out flying columns that threaten the Tashkent and Krasnovodsk Railway ... The entire country south of Tash-kent has been wrested from the Reds, including the Important towns of Yar-kand, Kashgar, Samarkand and Bokhara
  69. 1 2 Arabacı 2021b, p. 25.
  70. 1 2 İdil 2013, p. 227.
  71. Shahingoz 2020a, p. 31.
  72. Başbakanlık Cumhuriyet Arşivi (BCA), 23/8/1922, File: 43111, Background File: 30.10.0.0, Location number: 247.671.11
  73. RGASPI,f.558,op.11,d.29,l.50-51
  74. FO 371/8074/N 5478: Encrypted telegram from Humphrys to Curzon, Kabul, 29 May 1922
  75. Karabekir 2024e, p. 742, “İstanbul gazeteleri Şarkî Buhara’da Enver Paşa’nın Sovyet Rusya süvari kumandanı Yudeni’yi perişan ettiğini yazıyor.”.
  76. Sonyel 1990a, p. 1195.
  77. Hayit 1956a, p. 193.
  78. Baysun 2001a, p. 115.
  79. Ю.А 1976, p. 94.
  80. Smele 2017a, p. 271.
  81. 1 2 3 4 "Central Asian Review, Vol. VII, 1959 (Index and Articles)" (PDF). Central Asian Review. 7: 245. 1959.
  82. Lageard 1987a, p. 8.
  83. Yılmaz 1999c, p. 58.
  84. Мышов 2022, p. 87.
  85. 1 2 Ю.А 1976, p. 98.
  86. 1 2 3 Bogdanov 1997, p. 87.
  87. Kotelnikov 2024d, p. 14.
  88. Kotelnikov 2024d, p. 15.
  89. 1 2 Yeşilot 2021, p. 288.
  90. 1 2 3 4 5 Olcott 1981a, p. 359.
  91. 1 2 Johnson 1986, p. 33.
  92. Kydyralieva 2015b, p. 242.
  93. Kara 2011, pp. 131.
  94. Kutay 1955, p. 60.
  95. RGASPI,f.61,op.1,d.2,l.101-102
  96. RGASPI,f.17,op.84,d.356,l.70
  97. 1 2 Donuk 1992c, p. 108.
  98. Bademci 2008a, p. 393.
  99. Erer 1971b, p. 71.
  100. Turlybek 2013a, p. 366.
  101. Fraser 1987b, p. 59.
  102. Hayit 1956a, p. 202.
  103. Shermatov, Gafur (20 December 2017). "Тайная сделка советской власти с главным "басмачом" Средней Азии" [The Secret Deal of the Soviet Authorities with the Main "Basmachi" of Central Asia]. BBC News, Russian Service. Retrieved 13 September 2025.
  104. "During February-October 1922, the Red Army destroyed 119 Basmachi detachments (4 thousand people) out of 200." Check Krugosvet, Vadim Damier Basmach Movement (source is unavailable for now)
  105. Плеханов, Александр Михайлович (15 March 2024). "Басмачество". Большая российская энциклопедия (in Russian). АНО «Национальный научно-образовательный центр «Большая Российская энциклопедия». Retrieved 15 October 2025. советские войска провели операцию по окружению и уничтожению отрядов Энвер-паши, сам он был убит в бою. Численность басмачей, по оценке советской разведки, сократилась с 26 тыс. человек в мае до 6,7 тыс. человек в октябре 1922 г.
  106. Malikov 2020b, p. 173, Report of the chairman of the commission on the extermination of basmachis sokol'nikov to the central committee of the communist party: Basmachi movement is a reproach to all our work in Turkestan, and maybe even in the entire East. We have fought hard against the Basmachis for four years. However, we failed to suppress this movement. On the contrary, the Basmachi movement expanded to other raions, and now it covers entire Samarkand Oblast and some parts of Syr-Daria and Turkmen Oblast’s..
  107. Rossiiskii Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Sotsial’no Politicheskoi Istorii (hereafter RGASPI) [Russian State Archive of the Social Political History], fond 122, op. 1, d. 228. ll. 1-1ob.
  108. Riordan 2012, p. 15, At the current time the Basmachi are situated in Ashtak region in the mountains bordering the Tashkent region. They are near Naiman-Polvan, which is in Nanysk region, and in Kizil Pavate in the area close to the mountains..
  109. "Basmachi". Encyclopedia.com. Retrieved 2025-10-17. At their height in 1920–1922, some sources claim that the rebels had twenty to thirty thousand men under arms, controlled the Ferghana valley and most of Tajikistan, and enjoyed widespread popularity among the indigenous non-Russian population.
  110. Entsiklopedik Luğat, vol. 2 (Tashkent: Özbek Sovet Entsiklopediyasi, 1988), p. 117: "In the spring of 1922, the Basmachi occupied much of the Bukhara People's Soviet Republic; similar movements also occurred in Ferghana and Khorezm at that time."
  111. Schoeberlein-Engel 2009, "At its height (1920–1922), the Basmachi movement was in control of the entire Ferghana Valley, aside from Russian railroad and military installations, as well as most of what is now Tajikistan and some other areas.".
  112. Baumann 1993a, p. 112.
  113. Tannenbaum 2023a, p. 63.
  114. 1 2 Hayit 2006, p. 277.
  115. Krist 1939a, p. 78.
  116. Kydyralieva 2015b, p. 242..
  117. Fraser 1987c, pp. 14–16.
  118. Kydyralieva 2015b, p. 243..
  119. Togan 1981, p. 446.
  120. Kydyralieva 2015b, p. 243.
  121. "Mulla Abdulqahhor" (PDF). Oʻzbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi (in Uzbek). Vol. M. Tashkent: Oʻzbekiston Milliy Ensiklopediyasi Davlat Ilmiy Nashriyoti. 2003. p. 803.
  122. Sattorov 2025, p. 227..
  123. Rywkin 1990a, p. 39..
  124. Raşidov, U. (1994). "Buhara basmacıları aslı kim idi?" [Who Were the Basmachi of Bukhara?]. Mülakat (in Turkish) (11–12): 35.
  125. Kydyralieva 2015b, p. 244..
  126. Hopkirk 1995b, p. 159.
  127. Kotelnikov 2024d, p. 13.
  128. 1 2 Kydyralieva 2015b, p. 260.
  129. Gutliyev 2017a, p. 50.
  130. For example, Kydyralieva gives the number of troops under Junaid Khan as 1918 in the page 219, meanwhile "K. B. Muhammetberdiyew/Y. Orazgylyjow, Türkmenistanyn Taryhyndan Materiallar" book gives 4,000 and ÇELEBİ, Ercan Yaş Türkistan Dergisine Göre Türkistan Milli Mücadelesi even gives 80,000 in page 157 of his thesis.
  131. 1 2 Bademci 2008b, p. 412.
  132. Wheeler 1964, p. 110.
  133. Emre Esen, Türkistan’da Basmacılık Hareketi p.62
  134. Alimova 2000, p. 624.
  135. RGASPI,f.122,op.4,d.59,l.93-94ob
  136. 1 2 3 Hayit 2018a, p. 205.
  137. Olcott 1981a, p. 357.
  138. Bademci 2008b, p. 122.
  139. Kösoğlu 2023, p. 623.
  140. Kotelnikov 2024d, pp. 13–15.
  141. Bademci 2008b, pp. 132–133.
  142. Bademci 2015d, p. 142.
  143. Bademci 2019a, p. 145.
  144. Bademci 2008b, pp. 156–158.
  145. Bademci 2015d, p. 148.
  146. Baysun 2001a, pp. 92–93.
  147. 1 2 Doğan 1998, p. 108.
  148. Kara 2011, p. 134.
  149. Cebesoy 2017a, p. 335.
  150. Erer 1971b, pp. 122–123.
  151. Hayit 2018a, pp. 209–213.
  152. Fraser 1987c, pp. 34–37.
  153. Kydyralieva 2015b, p. 244.
  154. Fraser 1987b, p. 54.
  155. Allworth 1967, p. 252.
  156. Kydyralieva 2015b, p. 245.
  157. Hayit 2018a, p. 283.
  158. Hayit 2018a, pp. 205–206.
  159. Hayit 2018a, p. 207.
  160. 1 2 Fromkin 1989, p. 488.
  161. Ю.А 1976, p. 95.
  162. Fraser 1987c, pp. 37–38.
  163. Yılmaz 1999c, pp. 49–50.
  164. Castagné 1925d, pp. 49–50.
  165. 1 2 Hayit 1956a, pp. 194–195.
  166. Rezun 1992b, p. 30.
  167. FO 371/8074/N 6007, Confidential telegram from the Commander-in-Chief in India to the War Office, 13 June 1922.
  168. Sonyel 1990, p. 1195.
  169. FO 371/8080/N 8484, India Office to Foreign Office, dispatch, enclosing Secret Meshed Intelligence Diary, No.22, for the period ending 17 July 1922. Kew, London: The National Archives (UK).
  170. Fraser 1987b, p. 41.
  171. Hayit 2018a, p. 219.
  172. "Enver Paşa'nın Yeni bir Muvaffakiyeti," Liva el-İslam, Year 2, no. 15–16, p. 102, 1 Teşrin-i Ewel 1922.
  173. BCA, 23/8/1922, Dosya: 43111, Fon Kodu: 30.10.0.0, Yer No: 247.671.11
  174. Fraser 1987b, p. 60.
  175. Kozlovskiy 1928, p. 53.
  176. Baumann 1993a, pp. 112–113.
  177. Fraser 1987b, p. 61.
  178. Castagné 1925d, p. 59.
  179. Tsentral'nyi Gosudarstvennyi Arkhiv Respubliki Uzbekistan (Central State Archive of the Republic of Uzbekistan), fond. 48, delo. 103, l. 28ob
  180. Russian State Archive of Socio-Political History (RGASPI), fond. 62, opis 1, delo. 7, list. 71 (19.03.1923)
  181. BNSR Foreign Ministry to Representation of the Turkish Grand National Assembly, Moscow, 18 June 1922, TsGARUz, f. 48, op. 1, d. 103, ll. 28-28ob
  182. Khalid 2015a, p. 154.

Sources