Filter on a set

Last updated

In mathematics, a filter on a set is a family of subsets which is closed under supersets and finite intersections. The concept originates in topology, where the neighborhoods of a point form a filter on the space. Filters were introduced by Henri Cartan in 1937 [1] [2] and, as described in the article dedicated to filters in topology, they were subsequently used by Nicolas Bourbaki in their book Topologie Générale as an alternative to the related notion of a net developed in 1922 by E. H. Moore and Herman L. Smith. They have also found applications in model theory and set theory.

Contents

Filters on a set were later generalized to order filters. Specifically, a filter on a set is a order filter on the power set of ordered by inclusion.

The notion dual to a filter is an ideal. Ultrafilters are a particularly important subclass of filters.

Definition

Given a set , a filter on is a set of subsets of such that: [3] [4] [5]

A proper (or non-degenerate) filter is a filter which is proper as a subset of the powerset (i.e., the only improper filter is , consisting of all possible subsets). By upwards-closure, a filter is proper if and only if it does not contain the empty set. [4] Many authors adopt the convention that a filter must be proper by definition. [6] [7] [8] [9]

When and on the same set such that holds, is said to be coarser [10] than (or a subfilter of ) while is said to be finer [10] than (or subordinate to or a superfilter [11] of ).

Examples

Principal and free filters

The kernel of a filter on is the intersection of all the subsets of in .

A filter on is principal [3] (or atomic [13] ) when it has a particularly simple form: it contains exactly the supersets of , for some fixed subset . When , this yields the improper filter. When is a singleton, this filter (which consists of all subsets that contain ) is called the fundamental filter [3] (or discrete filter [19] ) associated with .

A filter is principal if and only if the kernel of is an element of , and when this is the case, consists of the supersets of its kernel. [20] On a finite set, every filter is principal (since the intersection defining the kernel is finite).

A filter is said to be free when it has empty kernel, otherwise it is fixed (and if is an element of the kernel, it is fixed by ). [21] A filter on a set is free if and only if it contains the Fréchet filter on . [22]

For every filter on , there exists a unique pair of filters (the free part of ) and (the principal part of ) on such that is free, is principal, , and some set from is disjoint from some set from . The principal part is the principal filter generated by the kernel of , and the free part consists of elements of with any number of elements from the kernel possibly removed. [22]

A filter is countably deep if the kernel of any countable subset of belongs to . [14]

Correspondence with order filters

The concept of a filter on a set is a special case of the more general concept of a filter on a partially ordered set. By definition, a filter on a partially ordered set is a subset of which is upwards-closed (if and then ) and downwards-directed (every finite subset of has a lower bound in ). A filter on a set is the same as a filter on the powerset ordered by inclusion. [b]

Constructions of filters

Intersection of filters

If is a family of filters on , its intersection is a filter on . The intersection is a greatest lower bound operation in the set of filters on partially ordered by inclusion, which endows the filters on with a complete lattice structure. [23]

The intersection consists of the subsets which can be written as where for each .

Filter generated by a family of subsets

Given a family of subsets , there exists a minimum filter on (in the sense of inclusion) which contains . It can be constructed as the intersection (greatest lower bound) of all filters on containing . This filter is called the filter generated by , and is said to be a filter subbase of .

The generated filter can also be described more explicitly: is obtained by closing under finite intersections, then upwards, i.e., consists of the subsets such that for some .

Since these operations preserve the kernel, it follows that is a proper filter if and only if has the finite intersection property: the intersection of a finite subfamily of is non-empty.

Two filters and on mesh when is proper.[ citation needed ]

Filter bases

Let be a filter on . A filter base of is a family of subsets such that is the upwards closure of , i.e., consists of those subsets for which for some .

This upwards closure is a filter if and only if is downwards-directed, i.e., is non-empty and for all there exists such that . When this is the case, is also called a prefilter, and the upwards closure is also equal to the generated filter . Hence, being a filter base of is a stronger property than being a filter subbase of .

Examples

  • When is a topological space and , a filter base of the neighborhood filter of is known as a neighborhood base for , and similarly, a filter subbase of the neighborhood filter of is known as a neighborhood subbase for . The open neighborhoods of always form a neighborhood base for , by definition of the neighborhood filter. In , the closed balls of positive radius around also form a neighborhood base for .
  • Let be an infinite set and let consist of the subsets of which contain all points but one. Then is a filter subbase of the Fréchet filter on , which consists of the cofinite subsets. Its closure under finite intersections is the entire Fréchet filter, but there are smaller bases of the Fréchet filter which contain the subbase , such as the one formed by the subsets of which contain all points but a finite odd number. In fact, for every base of the Fréchet filter, removing any subset yields another base of the Fréchet filter.
  • If is a topological space, the dense open subsets of form a filter base on , because they are closed under finite intersection. The filter they generate consists of the complements of nowhere dense subsets. On , restricting to the null dense open subsets yields another filter base for the same filter.[ citation needed ]
  • Similarly, if is a topological space, the countable intersections of dense open subsets form a filter base which generates the filter of comeager subsets.
  • Let be a set and let be a net with values in , i.e., a family whose domain is a directed set. The filter base of tails of consists of the sets for ; it is downwards-closed by directedness of . An elementary filter is a filter which has a filter base of this form. This example is fundamental in the application of filters in topology. [24]
  • Every π-system is a filter base.

Trace of a filter on a subset

If is a filter on and , the trace of on is , which is a filter.

Image or preimage of a filter by a function

Let be a function.

When is a family of subsets of , its image by is defined as

If is a filter on and is additionally surjective, then is a filter on ; furthermore, if is a filter base of then is a filter base of . The kernels of and are linked by .

Similarly, when is a family of subsets of , its preimage by is defined as

If is a filter on and is additionally injective, then is a filter on (since it is isomorphic to the trace of on the image of ); furthermore, if is a filter base of then is a filter base of , and unlike the image case, it also holds that if is a filter subbase of then is a filter subbase of . The kernels are linked by .

Product of filters

Given a family of sets and a filter on each , the product filter on the product set is defined as the filter generated by the sets for and , where is the projection from the product set onto the -th component. This construction is similar to the product topology. [12]

If each is a filter base on , a filter base of is given by the sets where is a family such that for all and for all but finitely many . [12]

See also

Notes

  1. The intersection of zero subsets of is itself.
  2. It is immediate that a filter on is an order filter on . For the converse, let be an order filter on . It is upwards-closed by definition. We check closure under finite intersections. If is a finite family of subsets from , it has a lower bound in by downwards-closure, which is some such that . Then , hence by upwards-closure.

Citations

  1. Cartan 1937a.
  2. Cartan 1937b.
  3. 1 2 3 4 Császár 1978, p. 56.
  4. 1 2 Schechter 1996, p. 100.
  5. 1 2 Willard 2004, p. 78.
  6. Dolecki & Mynard 2016, p. 29.
  7. Joshi 1983, p. 241.
  8. Köthe 1983, p. 11.
  9. Schubert 1968, p. 48.
  10. 1 2 Schubert 1968, p. 49.
  11. Schechter 1996, p. 102.
  12. 1 2 3 4 Bourbaki 1987, pp. 57–68.
  13. 1 2 3 Joshi 1983, p. 242.
  14. 1 2 3 Dolecki & Mynard 2016, p. 30.
  15. Schechter 1996, p. 103.
  16. Schechter 1996, p. 104.
  17. Jech, Thomas (2006). Set Theory: The Third Millennium Edition, Revised and Expanded. Berlin New York: Springer Science & Business Media. p. 74. ISBN   978-3-540-44085-7. OCLC   50422939.
  18. Schechter 1996, pp. 100–130.
  19. Wilansky 2013, p. 44.
  20. Dolecki & Mynard 2016, p. 33.
  21. Schechter 1996, p. 16.
  22. 1 2 Dolecki & Mynard 2016, p. 34.
  23. Schubert 1968, p. 50.
  24. Castillo, Jesus M. F.; Montalvo, Francisco (January 1990), "A Counterexample in Semimetric Spaces" (PDF), Extracta Mathematicae, 5 (1): 38–40

References