Fire-safe cigarette

Last updated

Fire-safe cigarettes (FSC) are cigarettes that are designed to extinguish more quickly than standard cigarettes if ignored, with the intention of preventing accidental fires. They are also known as lower ignition propensity (LIP), reduced fire risk (RFR), self-extinguishing, fire-safe or reduced ignition propensity (RIP) cigarettes. In the United States, "FSC" above the barcode signifies that the cigarettes sold are fire standards compliant (FSC).

Contents

Fire-safe cigarettes are produced by adding two to three thin bands of less-porous cigarette paper along the length of the cigarette, creating a series of harder-to-burn “speed bumps”. [1] As the cigarette burns down, it will tend to be extinguished at each of these points unless the user is periodically intensifying the flame by inhaling. [1] FSC cigarettes typically use ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) adhesive in the banding material. [2]

History

In 1929, a cigarette-ignited fire in Lowell, Massachusetts, caught the attention of U.S. Congresswoman Edith Nourse Rogers (D-MA); she called for the National Bureau of Standards (NBS) (now the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST)) to develop the first less fire-prone cigarette, which NBS introduced in 1932. The Boston Herald American covered the story on 31 March 1932, noting that after three years of research the NBS had developed a “self-snubbing” cigarette and had suggested that cigarette manufacturers “take up the idea”. None did. [3]

In 1973, the United States Congress established the Consumer Product Safety Commission (CPSC) to protect the public from hazardous products. Congress excluded tobacco products from its jurisdiction while assigning it responsibility for flammable fabrics.

In 1978 Andrew McGuire, a burn survivor, started a grassroots campaign to prevent house fire deaths by changing the cigarette. [4] McGuire secured funding for an investigation into cigarettes and fires which became Cigarettes and Sofas: How the Tobacco Lobby Keeps the Home Fires Burning. Massachusetts congressman Joe Moakley introduced federal FSC legislation in the autumn of 1979 after a cigarette fire in his district killed a family of seven; California senator Alan Cranston authored a matching Senate bill.

To forestall legislation mandating the inclusion of fire-safety features in cigarettes, the US Tobacco Institute financed a fire prevention education program in parallel with the campaign Fighting Fire with Firemen. [5] [6]

In 1984, the Cigarette Safety Act funded a three-year National Bureau of Standards (later NIST) study on how cigarettes and furnishings ignited and remained lit. This understanding of the physics of ignition enabled the NBS team to develop two test methods for the ignition strength of cigarettes, under the auspices of the CPSC. This reported to US Congress in 1987 that it was technically feasible and maybe commercially feasible to make a cigarette that was less likely to start fires. [7] Legislative activity continued in the states while the federal government, cigarette companies, and advocates discussed next steps. McGuire and colleagues continued to inform advocates about cigarette fires and prevention strategies, legislation and liability. [4] [8] [9] [10]

A compromise led to the US Fire Safe Cigarette Act of 1990, which required additional NIST research on the interaction of burning cigarettes with soft furnishings, such as upholstered furniture and beds. [11] The resulting study, while contentious, laid the groundwork for a flammability test method for cigarettes. [11] [12] Federal efforts to implement a standard stalled, as the Reagan and Bush administrations preferred free markets to regulation. The grassroots campaign focused on state efforts. McGuire continued to publish progress reports. [13] [14] [15]

Based on the NIST research, ASTM International's Committee E05 on Fire Standards developed E 2187, a "Standard Test Method for Measuring the Ignition Strength of Cigarettes", which evaluates cigarette's capacity to set fire to bedding and upholstered furniture in 2002. [11] In 2000, New York passed the first state law requiring the introduction of cigarettes that have a lower likelihood of starting a fire, with flammability evaluated by E 2187. [11] By spring 2006, four more states had passed laws modeled on New York's: Vermont, New Hampshire, California, and Illinois. McGuire published a campaign update. [16] In 2006 The National Fire Protection Association decided to fund the Fire Safe Cigarette Coalition to accelerate this grassroots movement. [17]

Since 1982, multiple lawsuits have been filed regarding cigarette-ignited fire deaths and injuries. The first successful lawsuit resulted in a 2 million dollar settlement for a young child severely burned in a car fire allegedly caused by a cigarette. [18]

Regional implementation

United States

As of August 26, 2011, all 50 states and the District of Columbia had passed state legislation modeled on New York's original bill, mandating the sale of fire-safe cigarettes. [19] State laws generally contain provisions permitting the sale of non-FSCs that have been tax-stamped by wholesalers and retailers in the state prior to the effective date of the state's FSC law. The laws require cigarettes to exhibit a greater likelihood of self-extinguishing using the E2187 test from ASTM International. The E2187 standard is cited in U.S. state legislation and is the basis for the fire-safe cigarette law in effect in Canada. It is being considered for legislation in other countries. [1]

Canada

On October 1, 2005, Canada became the first country to implement a nationwide cigarette fire safety standard. The law requires that all cigarettes manufactured in or imported into Canada must burn their full length no more than 25% of the time when tested using ASTM International method E2187-04: Standard Test Method for Measuring the Ignition Strength of Cigarettes. The law is based on the New York State legislation. Each year in Canada, fires started by smokers' materials kill approximately 70 people and cause 300 injuries, according to a study conducted by the Canadian Association of Fire Chiefs. [20]

Europe

On November 30, 2007, 27 EU states approved a European Commission proposal to require the tobacco industry to use fire-retardant paper in all cigarettes. The European Committee for Standardization said that these types of products would be universally available. [21] In November 2010, the General Product Safety Directive (GPSD) Committee of the European Commission agreed the standard and reached the consensus that enforcement of the standard (including at the point of sale to consumers) would start “about 12 months from its publication by CEN” – around 17 November 2011, with publication of reference to the standard in the Official Journal of the European Union. [22] The standard was implemented on that date. [23]

In the UK a proposal to ban the "old style" cigarettes in order to implement a fire-safe alternative was dropped as it is encompassed within the EU directive. [24]

West of Scotland MSP Stewart Maxwell was a long-time advocate of ‘fire-safer cigarettes’ and called for Scotland to take a lead in developing a European standard. Maxwell consistently called on the Scottish Government to use its influence to pressure the UK Government to ensure the introduction of ‘fire safer cigarettes’ as soon as possible. [25]

Australia

In Australia, around 14 people are claimed to die annually from cigarette related fires. [26] The government has accepted the proposal for FSCs and is in the process of implementing regulations. [27] Cigarette companies were required to change their products to ensure that cigarettes self-extinguish more readily before the regulations came into effect in March 2010. [28]

Responses from tobacco companies

In 2000 Philip Morris introduced the 'fire-safe' Merit cigarette, with two thicker paper bands to slow the burning. Later that year, the company received hundreds of complaints alleging that long, partly burned tobacco was falling off the tips of lit Merit cigarettes, burning skin and flammable items. An in-house scientist (Michael Lee Watkins) analyzed the data and concluded Merit to actually be a greater fire risk than conventional cigarettes. In early 2002 Watkins was fired, and Merit continued to be marketed. For concealing information about the fire hazard, the U.S. Department of Justice filed a lawsuit against Philip Morris. [29] [30]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cigarette</span> Small roll of tobacco made to be smoked

A cigarette is a narrow cylinder containing a combustible material, typically tobacco, that is rolled into thin paper for smoking. The cigarette is ignited at one end, causing it to smolder; the resulting smoke is orally inhaled via the opposite end. Cigarette smoking is the most common method of tobacco consumption. The term cigarette, as commonly used, refers to a tobacco cigarette, but the word is sometimes used to refer to other substances, such as a cannabis cigarette or a herbal cigarette. A cigarette is distinguished from a cigar by its usually smaller size, use of processed leaf, different smoking method, and paper wrapping, which is typically white.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Flash point</span> Lowest temperature at which a volatile materials vapors ignite if given a source

The flash point of a material is the "lowest liquid temperature at which, under certain standardized conditions, a liquid gives off vapours in a quantity such as to be capable of forming an ignitable vapour/air mixture".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Lighter</span> Handheld device used to generate a flame

A lighter is a portable device which uses mechanical or electrical means to create a controlled flame, and can be used to ignite a variety of flammable items, such as cigarettes, butane gas, fireworks, candles, or campfires. A lighter typically consists of a metal or plastic container filled with a flammable liquid, a compressed flammable gas, or in rarer cases a flammable solid ; a means of ignition to produce the flame; and some provision for extinguishing the flame or else controlling it to such a degree that the user may extinguish it with their breath. Alternatively, a lighter can be one which uses electricity to create an electric arc utilizing the created plasma as the source of ignition or a heating element can be used in a similar vein to heat the target to its ignition temperatures, as first formally utilized by Friedrich Wilhelm Schindler to light cigars and now more commonly seen incorporated into the automobile auxiliary power outlet to ignite the target material. Different lighter fuels have different characteristics which is the main influence behind the creation and purchasing of a variety of lighter types.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fire safety</span> Practices to reduce the results of fire

Fire safety is the set of practices intended to reduce destruction caused by fire. Fire safety measures include those that are intended to prevent the ignition of an uncontrolled fire and those that are used to limit the spread and impact of a fire.

Firefighting jargon includes a diverse lexicon of both common and idiosyncratic terms. One problem that exists in trying to create a list such as this is that much of the terminology used by a particular department is specifically defined in their particular standing operating procedures, such that two departments may have completely different terms for the same thing. For example, depending on whom one asks, a safety team may be referred to as a standby, a RIT or RIG or RIC, or a FAST. Furthermore, a department may change a definition within its SOP, such that one year it may be RIT, and the next RIG or RIC.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">UL 94</span> US plastics flammability standard

UL 94, the Standard for Safety of Flammability of Plastic Materials for Parts in Devices and Appliances testing, is a plastics flammability standard released by Underwriters Laboratories of the United States. The standard determines the material's tendency to either extinguish or spread the flame once the specimen has been ignited. UL-94 is now harmonized with IEC 60695-11-10 and 60695-11-20 and ISO 9772 and 9773.

Mixtures of dispersed combustible materials and oxygen in the air will burn only if the fuel concentration lies within well-defined lower and upper bounds determined experimentally, referred to as flammability limits or explosive limits. Combustion can range in violence from deflagration through detonation.

Active fire protection (AFP) is an integral part of fire protection. AFP is characterized by items and/or systems, which require a certain amount of motion and response in order to work, contrary to passive fire protection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Smouldering</span> Slow, flameless combustion

Smouldering or smoldering is the slow, flameless form of combustion, sustained by the heat evolved when oxygen directly attacks the surface of a condensed-phase fuel. Many solid materials can sustain a smouldering reaction, including coal, cellulose, wood, cotton, tobacco, cannabis, peat, plant litter, humus, synthetic foams, charring polymers including polyurethane foam and some types of dust. Common examples of smouldering phenomena are the initiation of residential fires on upholstered furniture by weak heat sources, and the persistent combustion of biomass behind the flaming front of wildfires.

A fire class is a system of categorizing fire with regard to the type of material and fuel for combustion. Class letters are often assigned to the different types of fire, but these differ between territories; there are separate standards for the United States, Europe (DIN EN2 Classification of fires ISO3941 Classification of fires, and Australia. The fire class is used to determine the types of extinguishing agents that can be used for that category.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fire-retardant fabric</span> Flame retardant fabric

Fire-retardant fabrics are textiles that are more resistant to fire than others through chemical treatment of flame-retardant or manufactured fireproof fibers.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Fire test</span>

A fire test is a means of determining whether fire protection products meet minimum performance criteria as set out in a building code or other applicable legislation. Successful tests in laboratories holding national accreditation for testing and certification result in the issuance of a certification listing.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Combustibility and flammability</span> Ability to easily ignite in air at ambient temperatures

A combustible material is a material that can burn in air under certain conditions. A material is flammable if it ignites easily at ambient temperatures. In other words, a combustible material ignites with some effort and a flammable material catches fire immediately on exposure to flame.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cone calorimeter</span>

A cone calorimeter is an instrument used to study the behavior of fire in small samples of condensed phase materials. It is widely used in the field of fire safety engineering and in oxygen consumption calorimetry.

Flame spread, or surface burning characteristics rating, is a ranking derived by laboratory standard test methodology of a material's propensity to burn rapidly and spread flames. There are several standardized methods of determining flame spread,

Andrew McGuire is an American trauma prevention specialist and grassroots campaigner. He was the first Executive Director of Action Against Burns, founder and Executive Director of the Burn Council, which was renamed the Trauma Foundation, in 1981. He is currently the Executive Director of California OneCare, a campaign to establish a "Medicare for All" type health insurance for all residents of California.

Oxygen compatibility is the issue of compatibility of materials for service in high concentrations of oxygen. It is a critical issue in space, aircraft, medical, underwater diving and industrial applications. Aspects include effects of increased oxygen concentration on the ignition and burning of materials and components exposed to these concentrations in service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Oxygen firebreak</span> Safety mechanism designed to extinguish a fire in a medical oxygen delivery tube

An oxygen firebreak, also known as a fire stop valve or fire safety valve, is a thermal fuse designed to extinguish a fire in the delivery tube being used by a patient on oxygen therapy and stop the flow of oxygen if the tube is accidentally ignited. Oxygen firebreaks are fitted into the oxygen delivery tubing close to the patient, typically around the patient's sternum where the two nasal cannula tubes join and connect to the delivery tubing.

In fire and explosion prevention engineering, purging refers to the introduction of an inert purge gas into a closed system to prevent the formation of an ignitable atmosphere. Purging relies on the principle that a combustible gas is able to undergo combustion (explode) only if mixed with air in the right proportions. The flammability limits of the gas define those proportions, i.e. the ignitable range.

In fire and explosion prevention engineering, inerting refers to the introduction of an inert (non-combustible) gas into a closed system to make a flammable atmosphere oxygen deficient and non-ignitable.

References

  1. 1 2 3 Wilhelm, Richard (May 2008). "Where There's Smoke There Doesn't Have to Be Fire" . Retrieved 21 January 2010.
  2. "SE Review: Toxicological implications of Fire Standards Compliant (FSC) paper". July 2017.
  3. "Coalition for Fire-Safe Cigarettes". www.firesafecigarettes.org. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  4. 1 2 McLoughlin, E (1982). "The Cigarette Safety Act". Journal of Public Health Policy. 3 (2): 226–228. doi:10.2307/3342038. JSTOR   3342038. PMID   7107890. S2CID   31931281.
  5. Gunja M, Wayne GF, Landman A, Connelly G, McGuire A (December 2002). "The case for fire-safe cigarettes made through industry documents". Tobacco Control . 11 (4): 346–353. doi:10.1136/tc.11.4.346. PMC   1747681 . PMID   12432160.
  6. Barbeau, EM; Gelder, G; Ahmed, S; et al. (2005). ""From strange bedfellows to natural allies " the shifting allegiance of fire service organizations in the push for federal FSC legislation". Tobacco Control. 14 (5): 338–345. doi: 10.1136/tc.2004.010637 . PMC   1748100 . PMID   16183985.
  7. Technical Study Group on Cigarette and Little Cigar Fire Safety. Toward a Less Fire-Prone Cigarette. Washington, DC: Consumer product Safety Commission, 1987
  8. Grannis, A. B. (1983). "The New York Cigarette Fire Safety Act". New York State Journal of Medicine. 83 (13): 1299. PMID   6582379.
  9. DeFrancesco S, Teret S, McGuire A. (1986). "Liability for Cigarette-related Fire Death and Injury". Trial Lawyer's Quarterly. 17 (4): 9–15.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  10. McGuire, Andrew (1989). "Fires, Cigarettes and Advocacy". Law, Medicine and Health Care. 17 (1): 73–77. doi:10.1111/j.1748-720X.1989.tb01074.x. PMID   2770350. S2CID   38131033.
  11. 1 2 3 4 "Test Method Measures Ignition Strength of Cigarettes". Standardization News. ASTM International. May 2003. Archived from the original on 3 August 2020. Retrieved 14 July 2017.
  12. Consumer Product Safety Commission (August 1993). Overview: Practicability of Developing a Performance Standard to Reduce Cigarette Ignition Propensity.
  13. McGuire A. (1992) "The Case of the Fire Safe Cigarette: the Synergism Between State and Federal Legislation," in Bergman A.B. (ed): Political Approaches to Injury Control at the State Level. University of Washington Press, Seattle/London, pp. 79–87. ISBN   978-0295971766
  14. McGuire, A., Daynard, R. (1992). "When Cigarettes Start Fires: Industry Liability". Trial Magazine. 28 (11): 44–49.{{cite journal}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  15. McGuire, A (1999). ""How the Tobacco Industry Continues to Keep the Home Fires Burning," Commentary". Tobacco Control. 8 (1): 67–69. doi:10.1136/tc.8.1.67. PMC   1763924 . PMID   10465819.
  16. McGuire, A (2005). "To Burn or Not to Burn: An Advocate's Report from the Field". Injury Prevention. 11 (5): 264–266. doi: 10.1136/ip.2005.009936 . PMC   1730265 . PMID   16203833.
  17. Durso, Fred Jr (2012). "Fire-Safe Cigarettes 2.0" (PDF). NFPA Journal.
  18. Levin, Myron (October 2, 2003) Tobacco Giant, in a Shift, Pays Victim. LA times
  19. "States that have passed fire-safe cigarette laws – NFPA". www.nfpa.org. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  20. "Canada is First Country to Require Fire-Safe Cigarettes". Coalition for Fire-Safe Cigarettes. October 1, 2005. Archived from the original on 2008-05-12.
  21. "New standard for self-extinguishing cigarettes". www.cen.eu. 18 November 2010. Archived from the original on 2012-03-10. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  22. "Justice and Consumers" (PDF). European Commission – European Commission. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  23. "Cigarette safety standards tightened across EU". BBC News. 17 November 2011. Retrieved 6 July 2019.
  24. Campbell, Denis (2007-05-27). "New 'fire-safe' cigarettes will put themselves out". The Guardian. London. Retrieved 2010-05-02.
  25. "S3M-05481 Stewart Maxwell (West of Scotland) (Scottish National Party): 49 out of 50 US States Agree to Fire-safe Cigarettes". parliament.uk. January 8, 2010. Archived from the original on 5 June 2011. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  26. Chapman, Simon; Balmain, Antony (20 September 2004). "Time to legislate for fire-safe cigarettes in Australia". The Medical Journal of Australia. 181 (6): 292–293. doi:10.5694/j.1326-5377.2004.tb06289.x. PMID   15377234. S2CID   1524662.
  27. "Govt pushes for fire-safe cigarettes by 2009". abc.gov.au. 26 March 2008. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  28. Tobaccowatch.org. "Australia – new regs fire-safe cigarettes by March 2010." snus-news.blogspot.com. Retrieved 12 April 2018.
  29. O'Connell, Vanessa (23 April 2004). "U.S. Suit Alleges Philip Morris Hid Cigarette-Fire Risk". The Wall Street Journal.
  30. "Merit Cigarettes - InjuryBoard.com". wiki.legalexaminer.com. Retrieved 12 April 2018.