Fixed-field alternating gradient accelerator

Last updated

A Fixed-Field alternating gradient Accelerator (FFA; also abbreviated FFAG) is a circular particle accelerator concept that can be characterized by its time-independent magnetic fields (fixed-field, like in a cyclotron) and the use of alternating gradient strong focusing (as in a synchrotron). [1] [2]

Contents

In all circular accelerators, magnetic fields are used to bend the particle beam. Since the magnetic force required to bend the beam increases with particle energy, as the particles accelerate, either their paths will increase in size, or the magnetic field must be increased over time to hold the particles in a constant size orbit. Fixed-field machines, such as cyclotrons and FFAs, use the former approach and allow the particle path to change with acceleration.

In order to keep particles confined to a beam, some type of focusing is required. Small variations in the shape of the magnetic field, while maintaining the same overall field direction, are known as weak focusing. Strong, or alternating gradient focusing, involves magnetic fields which alternately point in opposite directions. The use of alternating gradient focusing allows for more tightly focused beams and smaller accelerator cavities.

FFAs use fixed magnetic fields which include changes in field direction around the circumference of the ring. This means that the beam will change radius over the course of acceleration, as in a cyclotron, but will remain more tightly focused, as in a synchrotron. FFAs therefore combine relatively less expensive fixed magnets with increased beam focus of strong focusing machines. [3]

The initial concept of the FFA was developed in the 1950s, but was not actively explored beyond a few test machines until the mid-1980s, for usage in neutron spallation sources, as a driver for muon colliders [1] and to accelerate muons in a neutrino factory since the mid-1990s.

The revival in FFA research has been particularly strong in Japan with the construction of several rings. This resurgence has been prompted in part by advances in RF cavities and in magnet design. [4]

History

First development phase

The Michigan Mark I FFA accelerator. This 400KeV electron accelerator was the first operational FFA accelerator. The large rectangular part on the right is the betatron transformer core. MichiganFFAGmark1.jpg
The Michigan Mark I FFA accelerator. This 400KeV electron accelerator was the first operational FFA accelerator. The large rectangular part on the right is the betatron transformer core.

The idea of fixed-field alternating-gradient synchrotrons was developed independently in Japan by Tihiro Ohkawa, in the United States by Keith Symon, and in Russia by Andrei Kolomensky. The first prototype, built by Lawrence W. Jones and Kent M. Terwilliger at the University of Michigan used betatron acceleration and was operational in early 1956. [5] That fall, the prototype was moved to the Midwestern Universities Research Association (MURA) lab at University of Wisconsin, where it was converted to a 500 keV electron synchrotron. [6] Symon's patent, filed in early 1956, uses the terms "FFAG accelerator" and "FFAG synchrotron". [7] Ohkawa worked with Symon and the MURA team for several years starting in 1955. [8]

Donald Kerst, working with Symon, filed a patent for the spiral-sector FFA accelerator at around the same time as Symon's Radial Sector patent. [9] A very small spiral sector machine was built in 1957, and a 50 MeV radial sector machine was operated in 1961. This last machine was based on Ohkawa's patent, filed in 1957, for a symmetrical machine able to simultaneously accelerate identical particles in both clockwise and counterclockwise beams. [10] This was one of the first colliding beam accelerators, although this feature was not used when it was put to practical use as the injector for the Tantalus storage ring at what would become the Synchrotron Radiation Center. [11] The 50MeV machine was finally retired in the early 1970s. [12]

Layout of MURA FFA Mura ring.jpg
Layout of MURA FFA

MURA designed 10 GeV and 12.5 GeV proton FFAs that were not funded. [13] Two scaled down designs, one for 720 MeV [14] and one for a 500 MeV injector, [15] were published.

With the shutdown of MURA which began 1963 and ended 1967, [16] the FFA concept was not in use on an existing accelerator design and thus was not actively discussed for some time.

Continuing development

ASPUN ring (scaling FFA). The first ANL design ASPUN was a spiral machine designed to increase momentum threefold with a modest spiral as compared with the MURA machines. Aspun.jpg
ASPUN ring (scaling FFA). The first ANL design ASPUN was a spiral machine designed to increase momentum threefold with a modest spiral as compared with the MURA machines.
Example of a 16-cell superconducting FFA. Energy: 1.6 GeV, average radius 26 m. PhilM3-Gode.pdf
Example of a 16-cell superconducting FFA. Energy: 1.6 GeV, average radius 26 m.

In the early 1980s, it was suggested by Phil Meads that an FFA was suitable and advantageous as a proton accelerator for an intense spallation neutron source, [18] starting off projects like the Argonne Tandem Linear Accelerator at Argonne National Laboratory [19] and the Cooler Synchrotron at Jülich Research Centre. [20]

Conferences exploring this possibility were held at Jülich Research Centre, starting from 1984. [21] There have also been numerous annual workshops focusing on FFA accelerators [22] at CERN, KEK, BNL, TRIUMF, Fermilab, and the Reactor Research Institute at Kyoto University. [23] In 1992, the European Particle Accelerator Conference at CERN was about FFA accelerators. [24] [25]

The first proton FFA was successfully construction in 2000, [26] initiating a boom of FFA activities in high-energy physics and medicine.

With superconducting magnets, the required length of the FFA magnets scales roughly as the inverse square of the magnetic field. [27] In 1994, a coil shape which provided the required field with no iron was derived. [28] This magnet design was continued by S. Martin et al. from Jülich. [24] [29]

In 2010, after the workshop on FFA accelerators in Kyoto, the construction of the Electron Machine with Many Applications (EMMA) was completed at Daresbury Laboratory, UK. This was the first non-scaling FFA accelerator. Non-scaling FFAs are often advantageous to scaling FFAs because large and heavy magnets are avoided and the beam is much better controlled. [30]

Scaling vs non-scaling types

The magnetic fields needed for an FFA are quite complex. The computation for the magnets used on the Michigan FFA Mark Ib, a radial sector 500 keV machine from 1956, were done by Frank Cole at the University of Illinois on a mechanical calculator built by Friden. [6] This was at the limit of what could be reasonably done without computers; the more complex magnet geometries of spiral sector and non-scaling FFAs require sophisticated computer modeling.

The MURA machines were scaling FFA synchrotrons meaning that orbits of any momentum are photographic enlargements of those of any other momentum. In such machines the betatron frequencies are constant, thus no resonances, that could lead to beam loss, [31] are crossed. A machine is scaling if the median plane magnetic field satisfies

,

where

For an FFA magnet is much smaller than that for a cyclotron of the same energy. The disadvantage is that these machines are highly nonlinear. These and other relationships are developed in the paper by Frank Cole. [32]

The idea of building a non-scaling FFA first occurred to Kent Terwilliger and Lawrence W. Jones in the late 1950s while thinking about how to increase the beam luminosity in the collision regions of the 2-way colliding beam FFA they were working on. This idea had immediate applications in designing better focusing magnets for conventional accelerators, [6] but was not applied to FFA design until several decades later.

If acceleration is fast enough, the particles can pass through the betatron resonances before they have time to build up to a damaging amplitude. In that case the dipole field can be linear with radius, making the magnets smaller and simpler to construct. A proof-of-principle linear, non-scaling FFA called (EMMA) (Electron Machine with Many Applications) has been successfully operated at Daresbury Laboratory, UK,. [33] [34]

Vertical FFAs

Vertical Orbit Excursion FFAs (VFFAs) are a special type of FFA arranged so that higher energy orbits occur above (or below) lower energy orbits, rather than radially outward. This is accomplished with skew-focusing fields that push particles with higher beam rigidity vertically into regions with a higher dipole field. [35]

The major advantage offered by a VFFA design over a FFA design is that the path-length is held constant between particles with different energies and therefore relativistic particles travel isochronously. Isochronicity of the revolution period enables continuous beam operation, therefore offering the same advantage in power that isochronous cyclotrons have over synchrocyclotrons. Isochronous accelerators have no longitudinal beam focusing, but this is not a strong limitation in accelerators with rapid ramp rates typically used in FFA designs.

The major disadvantages include the fact that VFFAs requires unusual magnet designs and currently VFFA designs have only been simulated rather than tested.

Applications

FFA accelerators have potential medical applications in proton therapy for cancer, as proton sources for high intensity neutron production, for non-invasive security inspections of closed cargo containers, for the rapid acceleration of muons to high energies before they have time to decay, and as "energy amplifiers", for Accelerator-Driven Sub-critical Reactors (ADSRs) / Sub-critical Reactors in which a neutron beam derived from a FFA drives a slightly sub-critical fission reactor. Such ADSRs would be inherently safe, having no danger of accidental exponential runaway, and relatively little production of transuranium waste, with its long life and potential for nuclear weapons proliferation.

Because of their quasi-continuous beam and the resulting minimal acceleration intervals for high energies, FFAs have also gained interest as possible parts of future muon collider facilities.

Status

In the 1990s, researchers at the KEK particle physics laboratory near Tokyo began developing the FFA concept, culminating in a 150 MeV machine in 2003. A non-scaling machine, dubbed PAMELA, to accelerate both protons and carbon nuclei for cancer therapy has been designed. [36] Meanwhile, an ADSR operating at 100 MeV was demonstrated in Japan in March 2009 at the Kyoto University Critical Assembly (KUCA), achieving "sustainable nuclear reactions" with the critical assembly's control rods inserted into the reactor core to damp it below criticality.

See also

Further reading

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Cyclotron</span> Type of particle accelerator

A cyclotron is a type of particle accelerator invented by Ernest Lawrence in 1929–1930 at the University of California, Berkeley, and patented in 1932. A cyclotron accelerates charged particles outwards from the center of a flat cylindrical vacuum chamber along a spiral path. The particles are held to a spiral trajectory by a static magnetic field and accelerated by a rapidly varying electric field. Lawrence was awarded the 1939 Nobel Prize in Physics for this invention.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Linear particle accelerator</span> Type of particle accelerator

A linear particle accelerator is a type of particle accelerator that accelerates charged subatomic particles or ions to a high speed by subjecting them to a series of oscillating electric potentials along a linear beamline. The principles for such machines were proposed by Gustav Ising in 1924, while the first machine that worked was constructed by Rolf Widerøe in 1928 at the RWTH Aachen University. Linacs have many applications: they generate X-rays and high energy electrons for medicinal purposes in radiation therapy, serve as particle injectors for higher-energy accelerators, and are used directly to achieve the highest kinetic energy for light particles for particle physics.

Accelerator physics is a branch of applied physics, concerned with designing, building and operating particle accelerators. As such, it can be described as the study of motion, manipulation and observation of relativistic charged particle beams and their interaction with accelerator structures by electromagnetic fields.

ISABELLE was a 200+200 GeV proton–proton colliding beam particle accelerator partially built by the United States government at Brookhaven National Laboratory in Upton, New York, before it was cancelled in July, 1983.

A collider is a type of particle accelerator that brings two opposing particle beams together such that the particles collide. Colliders may either be ring accelerators or linear accelerators.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Synchrotron</span> Type of cyclic particle accelerator

A synchrotron is a particular type of cyclic particle accelerator, descended from the cyclotron, in which the accelerating particle beam travels around a fixed closed-loop path. The magnetic field which bends the particle beam into its closed path increases with time during the accelerating process, being synchronized to the increasing kinetic energy of the particles.

The Neutrino Factory is a type of proposed particle accelerator complex intended to measure in detail the properties of neutrinos, which are extremely weakly interacting fundamental particles that can travel in straight lines through normal matter for thousands of kilometres. The source of the neutrinos would be the decay of accelerated muons in straight sections of a storage ring. The technical issues surrounding these projects are broadly similar to those of a muon collider.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bevatron</span> Particle accelerator at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory

The Bevatron was a particle accelerator — specifically, a weak-focusing proton synchrotron — at Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, U.S., which began operating in 1954. The antiproton was discovered there in 1955, resulting in the 1959 Nobel Prize in physics for Emilio Segrè and Owen Chamberlain. It accelerated protons into a fixed target, and was named for its ability to impart energies of billions of eV.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Intersecting Storage Rings</span> Particle accelerator at CERN, Switzerland

The ISR was a particle accelerator at CERN. It was the world's first hadron collider, and ran from 1971 to 1984, with a maximum center of mass energy of 62 GeV. From its initial startup, the collider itself had the capability to produce particles like the J/ψ and the upsilon, as well as observable jet structure; however, the particle detector experiments were not configured to observe events with large momentum transverse to the beamline, leaving these discoveries to be made at other experiments in the mid-1970s. Nevertheless, the construction of the ISR involved many advances in accelerator physics, including the first use of stochastic cooling, and it held the record for luminosity at a hadron collider until surpassed by the Tevatron in 2004.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Proton Synchrotron</span> CERNs first synchrotron accelerator

The Proton Synchrotron is a particle accelerator at CERN. It is CERN's first synchrotron, beginning its operation in 1959. For a brief period the PS was the world's highest energy particle accelerator. It has since served as a pre-accelerator for the Intersecting Storage Rings (ISR) and the Super Proton Synchrotron (SPS), and is currently part of the Large Hadron Collider (LHC) accelerator complex. In addition to protons, PS has accelerated alpha particles, oxygen and sulfur nuclei, electrons, positrons, and antiprotons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Alternating Gradient Synchrotron</span> Particle accelerator at Brookhaven National Laboratory

The Alternating Gradient Synchrotron (AGS) is a particle accelerator located at the Brookhaven National Laboratory in Long Island, New York, United States.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">EMMA (accelerator)</span>

The electron machine with many applications or electron model for many applications (EMMA) is a linear non-scaling FFAG particle accelerator at Daresbury Laboratory in the UK that can accelerate electrons from 10 to 20 MeV. A FFAG is a type of accelerator in which the magnetic field in the bending magnets is constant during acceleration. This means the particle beam will move radially outwards as its momentum increases. Acceleration was successfully demonstrated in EMMA, paving the way for future non-scaling FFAGs to meet important applications in energy, security and medicine.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Strong focusing</span> Converging particle beams using alternating field gradients

In accelerator physics strong focusing or alternating-gradient focusing is the principle that, using sets of multiple electromagnets, it is possible to make a particle beam simultaneously converge in both directions perpendicular to the direction of travel. By contrast, weak focusing is the principle that nearby circles, described by charged particles moving in a uniform magnetic field, only intersect once per revolution.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Donald William Kerst</span> American physicist who developed the betatron

Donald William Kerst was an American physicist who worked on advanced particle accelerator concepts and plasma physics. He is most notable for his development of the betatron, a novel type of particle accelerator used to accelerate electrons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Particle accelerator</span> Research apparatus for particle physics

A particle accelerator is a machine that uses electromagnetic fields to propel charged particles to very high speeds and energies, and to contain them in well-defined beams. Large accelerators are used for fundamental research in particle physics. Accelerators are also used as synchrotron light sources for the study of condensed matter physics. Smaller particle accelerators are used in a wide variety of applications, including particle therapy for oncological purposes, radioisotope production for medical diagnostics, ion implanters for the manufacture of semiconductors, and accelerator mass spectrometers for measurements of rare isotopes such as radiocarbon.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Storage ring</span> Type of particle accelerator

A storage ring is a type of circular particle accelerator in which a continuous or pulsed particle beam may be kept circulating, typically for many hours. Storage of a particular particle depends upon the mass, momentum, and usually the charge of the particle to be stored. Storage rings most commonly store electrons, positrons, or protons.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">M. Stanley Livingston</span> American physicist (1905–1986)

Milton Stanley Livingston was an American accelerator physicist, co-inventor of the cyclotron with Ernest Lawrence, and co-discoverer with Ernest Courant and Hartland Snyder of the strong focusing principle, which allowed development of modern large-scale particle accelerators. He built cyclotrons at the University of California, Cornell University and the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. During World War II, he served in the operations research group at the Office of Naval Research.

An accelerator-driven subcritical reactor (ADSR) is a nuclear reactor design formed by coupling a substantially subcritical nuclear reactor core with a high-energy proton or electron accelerator. It could use thorium as a fuel, which is more abundant than uranium.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Midwestern Universities Research Association</span>

The Midwestern Universities Research Association (MURA) was a collaboration between 15 universities with the goal of designing and building a particle accelerator for the Midwestern United States. It existed between 1953–1967, but could not achieve its goal in this time and lost funding. It was thought that President John F. Kennedy would have supported the MURA machine, while one of President Lyndon B. Johnson's first actions was the shutdown of the MURA machine and laboratory.

References

  1. 1 2 Ruggiero, A.G. (Mar 2006). "Brief History of FFA Accelerators" (PDF). BNL-75635-2006-Cp.
  2. Daniel Clery (4 January 2010). "The Next Big Beam?". Science . 327 (5962): 142–143. Bibcode:2010Sci...327..142C. doi:10.1126/science.327.5962.142. PMID   20056871.
  3. Sheehy, S.L. (April 18, 2016). "Fixed-Field Alternating Gradient Accelerators". arXiv: 1604.05221 [physics.acc-ph].
  4. Mori, Y. (2004). "Developments of FFA Accelerator" (PDF). Proceedings of FFAG04 /. Archived from the original (PDF) on 2016-12-20. Retrieved 2016-05-04.
  5. Lawrence W. Jones, Kent M. Terwilliger, A Small Model Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Radial Sector Accelerator, Technical Report MURA-LWJ/KMT-5 (MURA-104), April 3, 1956; contains photos, scale drawings and design calculations.
  6. 1 2 3 Jones, L. W. (1991). "Kent M. Terwilliger; graduate school at Berkeley and early years at Michigan, 1949–1959". Kent M. Terwilliger memorial symposium, 13−14 Oct 1989. AIP Conference Proceedings. Vol. 237. pp. 1–21. doi:10.1063/1.41146. hdl:2027.42/87537.
  7. USpatent 2932797, Keith R. Symon,"Imparting Energy to Charged Particles",issued 1960-04-12
  8. Jones, L. W.; Sessler, A. M.; Symon, K. R. (2007). "A Brief History of the FFAG Accelerator". Science . 316 (5831): 1567. doi:10.1126/science.316.5831.1567. PMID   17569845. S2CID   5201822.
  9. USpatent 2932798, Donald William Kerst and Keith R. Symon,"Imparting Energy to Charged Particles",issued 1960-04-12
  10. USpatent 2890348,Tihiro Ohkawa,"Particle Accelerator",issued 1959-06-09
  11. Schopper, Herwig F. (1993). Advances in Accelerator Physics. World Scientific. p. 529. ISBN   9789810209582.
  12. E. M. Rowe and F. E. Mills, Tantalus I: A Dedicated Storage Ring Synchrotron Radiation Source, Particle Accelerators, Vol. 4 (1973); pages 211-227.
  13. F. C. Cole, Ed., 12.5 GeV FFA Accelerator, MURA report (1964)
  14. Cole, F. T.; Parzen, G.; Rowe, E. M.; Snowdon, S. C.; MacKenzie, K. R.; Wright, B. T. (1963). "Design of a 720 MeV Proton FFA Accelerator" (PDF). Proc. International Conference on Sector-Focused Cyclotrons and Meson Factories. 25: 189–196. Bibcode:1964NucIM..25..189C. doi:10.1016/0029-554X(63)90185-X.
  15. Snowdon, S.; Christian, R.; Rowe, E.; Curtis, C.; Meier, H. (1985). "Design Study of a 500 MeV FFA Injector". Proc. 5th International Conference on High Energy Accelerators. OSTI   4453496.
  16. Jones, L.; Mills, F.; Sessler, A.; Symon, K.; Young, D. (2010). Innovation was not enough: a history of the Midwestern Universities Research Association (MURA). World Scientific. Bibcode:2010ine..book.....J. ISBN   9789812832832.
  17. Khoe, T.K.; Kustom, R.L. (August 1983). "ASPUN, Design for an Argonne Super Intense Pulsed Neutron Source". IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science . 30 (4): 2086–2088. Bibcode:1983ITNS...30.2086K. CiteSeerX   10.1.1.609.1789 . doi:10.1109/tns.1983.4332724. ISSN   0891-9356. S2CID   31021790.
  18. Meads, P.; Wüstefeld, G. (October 1985). "An FFA Compressor and Accelerator Ring Studied for the German Spallation Neutron Source". IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science . 32 (5 (part II)): 2697–2699. Bibcode:1985ITNS...32.2697M. doi:10.1109/TNS.1985.4334153. S2CID   41784649.
  19. "Argonne History: Understanding the Physical Universe". Argonne National Laboratory. Archived from the original on 9 September 2004.
  20. "COSY - Fundamental research in the field of hadron, particle, and nuclear physics". Institute for Nuclear Physics. Retrieved 12 February 2017.
  21. Wüstefeld, G. (14 May 1984). "2nd Jülich Seminar on Fixed Field Alternating Gradient Accelerators (FFA)". Jülich . Retrieved 12 February 2017.
  22. Craddock, M.K. (2005). "New Concepts in FFAG Design for Secondary Beam Facilities and Other Applications" (PDF). 21St Particle Accelerator Conference (Pac 05): 261. Bibcode:2005pac..conf..261C . Retrieved 12 February 2012.
  23. "Previous Workshops". BNL . Retrieved 12 February 2017.
  24. 1 2 Martin, S.; Meads, P.; Wüstefeld, G.; Zaplatin, E.; Ziegler, K. (13 October 1992). "Study of FFAG Options for a European Pulsed Neutron Source (ESS)" (PDF). Proc. XIII National Accelerator Conference, Dubna, Russia.
  25. Zaplatin, E. (24 March 1992). "Fourth Accelerator Meeting for the EPNS". European Particle Accelerator Conference.
  26. M. Aiba; et al. (2000). "Development of a FFAG Proton Synchrotron". European Particle Accelerator Conference.
  27. Meads, P. F.; Wüstefeld, G. (1985). "An FFAG Compressor and Accelerator Ring Studied for the German Spallation Neutron Source" (PDF). IEEE Transactions on Nuclear Science. 32 (5): 2697–2699. Bibcode:1985ITNS...32.2697M. doi:10.1109/TNS.1985.4334153. S2CID   41784649.
  28. Abdelsalam, M.; Kustom, R. (July 1994). "Superconducting magnet design for Fixed-Field Alternating-Gradient (FFAG) Accelerator". IEEE Transactions on Magnetics. 30 (4): 2620–2623. Bibcode:1994ITM....30.2620A. doi:10.1109/20.305816.
  29. S. A. Martin; et al. (24 May 1993). "FFAG Studies for a 5 MW Neutron Source". International Collaboration on Advanced Neutron Sources (ICANS).
  30. D. Trbojevic, E. Keil, A. Sessler. "Non-Scaling Fixed Field Gradient Accelerator (FFAG) Design for the Proton and Carbon Therapy" (PDF). Retrieved 12 February 2017.{{cite web}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  31. Livingston, M. S.; Blewett, J. (1962). Particle Accelerators. New York: McGraw-Hill. ISBN   978-1114443846.
  32. Typical Designs of High Energy FFA Accelerators, International Conference on High Energy Accelerators, CERN-1959, pp 82-88.
  33. Edgecock, R.; et al. (2008). "EMMA, The World's First Non-scaling FFAG" (PDF). Proc. European Particle Accelerator Conference 2008: 2624. Bibcode:2007pac..conf.2624E.
  34. S. Machida et al, Nature Physics vol 8 issue 3 pp 243-247
  35. Brooks, S. (2013). "Vertical orbit excursion fixed field alternating gradient accelerators". Physical Review Special Topics: Accelerators and Beams. 16 (8): 084001. Bibcode:2013PhRvS..16h4001B. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.084001 .
  36. Peach, K (11 March 2013). "Conceptual design of a nonscaling fixed field alternating gradient accelerator for protons and carbon ions for charged particle therapy". Physical Review Special Topics - Accelerators and Beams. 16 (3): 030101. Bibcode:2013PhRvS..16c0101P. doi: 10.1103/PhysRevSTAB.16.030101 .