General Motors X platform (FWD)

For the preceding rear-wheel drive platform, see General Motors X platform (RWD).

GM X platform (FWD)
Overview
Manufacturer	General Motors
Also called	X-body
Production	1979–1985
Body and chassis
Class	Compact
Layout	Front engine, front-wheel drive
Body style(s)	2-door notchback coupé 3-door hatchback 4-door notchback sedan 5-door hatchback
Vehicles	Chevrolet Citation Oldsmobile Omega Pontiac Phoenix Buick Skylark
Related	GM A platform (FWD)
Powertrain
Engine(s)	2.5 L Iron Duke I4 2.8 L 60° V6
Transmission(s)	3-speed TH 125 automatic 4-speed manual
Dimensions
Wheelbase	104.9 in (2,664 mm)
Chronology
Predecessor	GM X platform (RWD)
Successor	GM N platform GM L platform

The General Motors front-wheel drive X platform was used for compact cars from the 1980 through 1985 model years, superseding the earlier, similarly designated, rear-drive platform.

After front-wheel drive cars had become somewhat common in the North American market, first through foreign imports, and then by American-badged but wholly or partially foreign-developed cars (e.g., the Ford Fiesta and Dodge Omni), GM's X-bodies were the first American-developed front-wheel drive cars introduced for the high-volume, mainstream market. GM would subsequently migrate most of its mainstream platforms to front-wheel drive as well.

Where numerous earlier American front-wheel drive cars were aimed at the luxury market and manufactured in relatively small numbers, the GM X bodies offered an alternative to high volume imported front-wheel drive compacts — and initially met considerable sales success.

Ultimately, the X-bodies — which included the 1980–1985 Chevrolet Citation, 1980–1984 Oldsmobile Omega, 1980–1984 Pontiac Phoenix and 1980–1985 Buick Skylark — became synonymous with their design defects, and GM's mishandled response. ^[1]

The X platform was the basis for the intermediate FWD GM A-body that proved much more successful. The X platform was superseded by the L-body and N-body platforms, which were derived from the J-body platform.

Design defects

For General Motors, the transverse front-drive configuration had represented uncharted engineering territory. At a time the company had begun reorganizing, and began using a new engineering approach, with its divisions responsible for a single aspect of the design rather than an integrated whole. ^[2] After a significantly compressed design development, the X-bodies entered production and sales — and the design's most prominent engineering deficiency, the rear brakes, became obvious. ^[3]

In 1979, during even the first months of manufacture, GM made a number of revisions to the car's braking system. Automotive journalists and reviewers noted in the autumn of 1979 rear wheels' tendency to lock upon heavy braking, such as in an emergency situation, a potentially dangerous behavior compromising vehicle control. In the first year of manufacture, hundreds of complaints noted rear brake locking, with dozens of related accidents and injuries — including one death, the latter triggering a lawsuit. The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration pressured General Motors for remedial action.

GM issued a voluntary, though unpublicized recall to modify the brake proportioning valve of only the earliest manual transmission models, less than 50,000 of the already more than one million X cars on the road. While remaining publicly silent on the safety implications of the brake design, leaked internal documents demonstrated that GM's engineering staff were dubious the valve modification would suffice, even for those cars subject to the recall — and that further changes to the brake linings and brake drums were required — that could raise the cost per vehicle by $70-$150, and would need to address a far greater number of vehicles. ^{[4] [5] [6]}

More complaints, accidents, injuries, and lawsuits ensued, including cars which had earlier been recalled and modified, as well as cars from the 1981 model year. This caused the NHTSA to pressure GM for further action, preferably a recall of all 1.1 million vehicles in the 1980 model year for replacement of the brake proportioning valves, brake linings and drums.

GM responded in 1983 with a voluntary recall of only all manual transmission vehicles of that year and the very earliest automatic transmission cars, a total of fewer than 250,000 vehicles, including those addressed in the first recall.

NHTSA sued GM, demanding a recall of the entire 1980 model year, claiming the company had known as far back as 1978 of the cars' tendency to lock rear brakes — and had provided misleading and incomplete answers to NHTSA's investigation.

Though the NHTSA had logged 4,282 complaints, including 1,417 accidents, 427 injuries and 18 fatalities, ^{[4] [5] [6]} the presiding judge dismissed the suit in 1987, ruling that NHTSA had filed the suit prematurely, and had relied mainly on anecdotal evidence, without properly developing conclusive evidence or holding investigative hearings.

The openly contentious back and forth, not only damaged the reputation of the X cars, but General Motors itself — with Hagerty (Insurance), specialist in classic cars, noting that the X-car was "one of the malaziest cars" of the Malaise era, doing enormous damage to GM's reputation ^[7] and playing a role in "the sharpest decrease in American market share" General Motors would experience in the 1980s. ^{[2] [8]}

The intermediate FWD GM A-body, heavily derived from the X platform, did not suffer the same reputation, and GM would significantly delay the introduction of its subsequent full size transverse engine FWD C and H platform vehicles, in the face of engineering issues.

References

1. https://web.archive.org/web/20131102021525/http://www.cg.org.cn/english/practice/GM.asp ^{[ bare URL ]}
2. Michelle Higgins (December 2, 2004). "Riding High: Auto Makers Jack Up the Car Seat; Finding Your Ideal 'H-Point'". The Wall Street Journal.
3. Pearley Huffman, John (2008-11-25). "10 Cars That Damaged GM's Reputation: 1980-1985 X-Cars". Popular Mechanics. Archived from the original on 2009-07-16. Retrieved 2009-09-17.
4. Burnham, David (1983-01-05). "Brake tests on 1980 G.M. X-cars suggest a wider recall is needed"". New York Times. Retrieved 2017-02-11.
5. Stuart, Reginald (1987-04-15). "Judge Supports G.M. on Brakes in 1980 X-Cars". New York Times. Retrieved 2009-09-17.
6. Brown, Warren (1983-09-05). "The Long and Winding Road of the X-Car Braking Controversy". Washington Post. Retrieved 2017-02-11.
7. Sass, Rob (1 August 2013). "Heavier. Slower. Safer". The Hagerty Group, LLC.
8. https://web.archive.org/web/20131102021525/http://www.cg.org.cn/english/practice/GM.asp ^{[ bare URL ]}