Historicity and origin of the resurrection of Jesus

Last updated

The historicity and origin of the resurrection of Jesus has been the subject of historical research and debate, as well as a topic of discussion among theologians. The accounts of the Gospels, including the empty tomb and the appearances of the risen Jesus to his followers, have been interpreted and analyzed in diverse ways, and have been seen variously as historical accounts of a literal event, as accounts of visionary experiences, as non-literal eschatological parables, and as fabrications of early Christian writers, among various other interpretations. It has been suggested, for example, that Jesus did not die on the cross, that the empty tomb was the result of Jesus' body having been stolen, or, as was common with Roman crucifixions, that Jesus was never entombed.

Contents

Post-Enlightenment historians work with methodological naturalism, [1] [2] and therefore reject miracles as objective historical facts. [1]

Origin: cultural and theological background

Resurrection and the afterlife of the soul

Of the three main Jewish sects of the 1st century AD, the Sadducees held that both soul and body perished at death, the Essenes that the soul was immortal but the flesh was not, and the Pharisees that the soul was immortal and that the body would be resurrected to house it. [3] Of these three positions, Jesus and the early Christians appear to have been closest to that of the Pharisees. [4] Resurrection was available to the righteous alone, and would make them equal to the angels, as the Gospels have Jesus tell: "Those who are accounted worthy [...] to the resurrection from the dead [...] are equal to the angels and are children of God" (Mark 12:24-25, Luke 20:34-36). [5] Nor would the resurrected body be one of flesh and blood, but an immortal fleshless body of the same celestial nature as the sun, moon and stars. [6]

Jews did not believe that the dead could enter Heaven  – mankind's place was the earth, and heaven was for God and the heavenly beings. [7] The Greeks held a similar view, but they also held that a man of exceptional merit could be exalted as a god after his death. [8] The successors of Alexander the Great made this idea very well known throughout the Middle East, in particular through coins bearing his image – a privilege previously reserved for gods – and although originally foreign to the Romans, the doctrine was soon borrowed by the emperors for purposes of political propaganda. [8] According to the theology of Imperial Roman apotheosis, the earthly body of the recently deceased emperor vanished, he received a new and divine one in its place, and was then seen by credible witnesses. [9] Thus, in a story similar to the Gospel appearances of the resurrected Jesus and the commissioning of the disciples, Romulus, the founder of Rome, descended from the sky to command a witness to bear a message to the Romans regarding the city's greatness ("Declare to the Romans the will of Heaven that my Rome shall be the capital of the world...") before being taken up on a cloud. [10]

The experiences of the risen Christ attested by the earliest written sources – the "primitive Church" creed of 1 Corinthians 15:3-5, in 1 Corinthians 15:8 and Galatians 1:16 – are ecstatic rapture events and "invasions of heaven". [11] A physical resurrection was unnecessary for this visionary mode of seeing the risen Christ, but the general movement of subsequent New Testament literature is towards the physical nature of the resurrection. [12] This development is linked to the changing make-up of the Christian community: Paul the Apostle and the earliest Christ followers were Jewish, and Second Temple Judaism emphasised the life of the soul; the gospel writers, in an overwhelmingly Greco-Roman church, stressed instead the pagan belief in the hero who is immortalised and deified in his physical body. [13] In this Hellenistic resurrection paradigm Jesus dies, is buried, and his body disappears (with witnesses to the empty tomb); he then returns in an immortalised physical body, able to appear and disappear at will like a god, and returns to the heavens which are now his proper home. [14]

Theological considerations

The earliest Jewish followers of Jesus (the Jewish Christians) understood him as the son of man in the Jewish sense, a human who, through his perfect obedience to God's will, was resurrected and exalted to heaven in readiness to return as the son of man (the figure from Daniel 7:13–14), [15] ushering in and ruling over the Kingdom of God. [16] [ need quotation to verify ] Paul, however, at his time of writing had already moved away from this apocalyptic tradition towards a position where Christology and soteriology took precedence: Jesus was no longer the one who proclaimed the message of the imminently coming Kingdom, but instead actually was the kingdom, the one in whom the kingdom of God is already present. [17] This is also the message of the Gospel of Mark, written by a gentile writing for a church of gentile Christians, for whom Jesus as "Son of God" had become a divine being whose suffering, death and resurrection were essential to God's plan for redemption. [18]

Matthew presents Jesus' appearance in Galilee (Matthew 28:19-20) as a Greco-Roman apotheosis, the human body transformed to make it fitting for paradise. [19] Matthew goes beyond the ordinary Greco-Roman forms, however, by having Jesus claim "all authority [...] in heaven and on earth" (28:18) – a claim no Roman hero would dare make – while charging the apostles to bring the whole world into a divine community of righteousness and compassion. [20] Notable too is that the expectation of the imminent Second Coming is delayed: in Matthew, it will still come about, but first the whole world must be gathered in. [20]

In Paul and the first three gospels, and also in Revelation, Jesus is portrayed as having the highest status, but the Jewish commitment to monotheism prevents the authors from depicting him as fully one with God. [21] This stage was reached first in the Christian community which produced the Johannine literature: only here in the New Testament does Jesus become God incarnate, the body of the resurrected Jesus bringing Doubting Thomas to exclaim, "My Lord and my God!" [22] [23]

Historicity

The miraculous catch of 153 fish by Duccio, 14th century. Jesus is standing on the left, in the fourth resurrection appearance in John's gospel. The miracle of the Catch of 153 fish.jpg
The miraculous catch of 153 fish by Duccio, 14th century. Jesus is standing on the left, in the fourth resurrection appearance in John's gospel.

Textual sources

The earliest mention of the resurrection is in the Pauline epistles, which tradition dates from between 50 and 58 AD. [24] [25] Paul shows very little interest in the teachings of Jesus, focusing attention instead on his role as the suffering, dying, resurrected Christ who would return at any moment to gather the elect and judge the world. [26] In his first epistle to the Corinthians Paul passes on a creed that he says he received shortly after his conversion (1 Corinthians 15:1–8). [27] [28] Christ, he says, was raised on the third day "according to the scriptures: and then appeared to various followers." [lower-alpha 1] He lists, in what appears to be in chronological order, a first appearance to Peter, then to "the Twelve," then to five hundred at one time, then to James (presumably James the brother of Jesus), then to "all the Apostles," and last to Paul himself. [28] Paul does not mention any appearances to women at the tomb, and other New Testament sources do not mention any appearance to a crowd of 500. According to Habermas, this is an indication of the lack of credibility of women, where their testimony has already been removed from the early creed. [28] There is general agreement that the list is pre-Pauline, dated to within 6 months and no later than 3 years after Jesus's death, but less on how much of it belongs to the tradition and how much is from Paul: most scholars feel that Peter and the Twelve are original, but not all believe the same of the appearances to the 500, James, and "all the Apostles". [29]

The next texts that mention the resurrection are the four Gospels and the Acts of the Apostles. These date from between 70 and 110 AD, and it is almost certain that none of them were written directly by eyewitnesses, although the author of Luke [lower-alpha 2] mentions being in direct contact with them. [33] [34] To take a few examples, according to the Synoptic Gospels Jesus's ministry appears to take one year, inferred from the mentions of a sole instance of Jesus's visit to the Jerusalem temple. His ministry was spent primarily in Galilee, and climaxed with a single visit to Jerusalem at which he cleansed the Temple of the money-changers, while in John, Jerusalem was the focus of Jesus' mission, he visited it three times (possibly indicating his mission lasted three years rather than one), and the cleansing of the Temple took place at the beginning rather than the end of the ministry. [35] Mark, written in the period 65–75 AD, originally contained little mention of post-resurrection appearances, although Mark 16:7, in which the young man discovered in the tomb instructs the women to tell "the disciples and Peter" that Jesus will see them again in Galilee, hints that the author may have known of the tradition. [36] According to Telford, the verb of seeing Jesus, horan, is used in 1 Corinthians as well as Mark, indicating the author of Mark's knowledge of the oral sayings. [37]

The authors of Matthew (c. 80–90 AD) and Luke/Acts (a two-part work by the same anonymous author, usually dated to around 80–90 AD) based their lives of Jesus on the Gospel of Mark [38] [39] but diverge after Mark 16:8. Whereas Mark ends with the discovery of the empty tomb, Matthew continues on with two post-resurrection appearances, the first to Mary Magdalene and "the other Mary" at the tomb, and the second, based on Mark 16:7, to all the disciples on a mountain in Galilee, where Jesus claims authority over heaven and earth and commissions the disciples to preach the gospel to the whole world. [40] Luke does not mention any of the appearances reported by Matthew, [41] and incorporates Jerusalem rather than just Galilee as the sole location. [37] In Luke, Jesus appears to Cleopas and an unnamed disciple on the road to Emmaus, to Peter (reported by the other apostles), and to the eleven remaining disciples at a meeting with others. The appearances reach their climax with the ascension of Jesus before the assembled disciples on a mountain outside Jerusalem. In addition, Acts has appearances to Paul on the road to Damascus, to the martyr Stephen, and to Peter, who hears the voice of Jesus.

The Gospel of John was written some time after 80 or 90 AD, and differs significantly from both Matthew and Luke. [42] Here Jesus appears at the empty tomb to Mary Magdalene (who initially fails to recognise him), then to the disciples minus Thomas, then to all the disciples including Thomas (the "doubting Thomas" episode), finishing with an extended appearance in Galilee to Peter and six (not all) of the disciples. [43] Chapter 21, the appearance in Galilee, is widely believed to be a later addition to the original gospel. [44] Later sources, such as the Gnostic gospels, which were rejected as heresy, with large embellishments can be contrasted with the canonical Gospels and help to separate later embellishment and invention. [37]

The empty tomb

5 part resurrection icon, Solovetsky Monastery, 17th century 5part-icon.jpeg
5 part resurrection icon, Solovetsky Monastery, 17th century

There are various arguments against the historicity of the resurrection story. For example, the number of other historical figures and gods with similar death and resurrection accounts has been pointed out. [45] [lower-alpha 3] However, the majority consensus among biblical scholars is that the genre of the Gospels is a kind of ancient biography.[ further explanation needed ] [47] Christ-myth theorist Robert M. Price claims that if the resurrection could, in fact, be proven through science or historical evidence, the event would lose its miraculous qualities. [45]

New Testament historian Bart D. Ehrman recognizes that "Some scholars have argued that it's more plausible that in fact Jesus was placed in a common burial plot, which sometimes happened, or was, as many other crucified people, simply left to be eaten by scavenging animals." He further elaborates by saying: "[T]he accounts are fairly unanimous in saying (the earliest accounts we have are unanimous in saying) that Jesus was in fact buried by this fellow, Joseph of Arimathea, and so it's relatively reliable that that's what happened." [48] He later changed his mind, stating that part of the crucifixion punishment was being "left to decompose and serve as food for scavenging animals", i.e. left without decent burial, since everyone wanted to have a decent burial in the Antiquity. [49]

Géza Vermes presents six valid possibilities to explain the empty tomb narrative:

  1. The body was removed by someone unconnected with Jesus;
  2. The body was stolen by the disciples;
  3. The empty tomb (the tomb visited by the women) was not the tomb of Jesus;
  4. Buried alive, Jesus later left the tomb;
  5. Jesus recovered from a coma and departed Judea;
  6. There was a spiritual, not bodily, resurrection.

Vermes states that none of these six possibilities is likely to be historical. [50] According to N. T. Wright in his book The Resurrection of the Son of God, "There can be no question: Paul is a firm believer in bodily resurrection. He stands with his fellow Jews against the massed ranks of pagans; with his fellow Pharisees against other Jews." [51]

According to Gary Habermas, professor at the Evangelical Liberty University, "Many other scholars have spoken in support of a bodily notion of Jesus' resurrection." [52] Habermas also points out three facts in support of Paul's belief in a physical resurrection body:

  1. Paul is a Pharisee and therefore (unlike the Sadducees) believes in a physical resurrection;
  2. In Philippians 3:11 Paul says "That I may attain to the ek anastasis (out-resurrection)" from the dead, which according to Habermas means that "What goes down is what comes up". And;
  3. In Philippians 3:20-21 "We look from heaven for Jesus who will change our vile soma (body) to be like unto his soma (body)".

According to Habermas, if Paul meant that resurrection changes a physical body into a spiritual body then Paul would have used the Greek pneuma instead of soma. [53]

According to a rough estimate by scholar Gary Habermas, professor at the Evangelical Liberty University, 75% of New Testament scholars are in favor of an empty tomb, while 25% reject an empty tomb. [54]

Post-resurrection appearances

New Testament scholar and theologian E. P. Sanders argues that a concerted plot to foster belief in the resurrection would probably have resulted in a more consistent story, and that some of those who were involved in the events gave their lives for their belief. Sanders offers his own hypothesis, saying "there seems to have been a competition: 'I saw him,' 'so did I,' 'the women saw him first,' 'no, I did; they didn't see him at all,' and so on." [55] "That Jesus' followers (and later Paul) had resurrection experiences is, in my judgment, a fact. What the reality was that gave rise to the experiences I do not know." [56] According to N.T. Wright, the dominant paradigm of the post-Enlightenment historians is that the resurrection of Jesus was simply a subjective experience. [57] %99+Resurrection%3F+A+Little+Book+of+Guidance&hl=es&sa=X&redir_esc=y}}</ref>

James Dunn notes that whereas the apostle Paul's resurrection experience was "visionary in character" and "non-physical, non-material," the accounts in the Gospels are very different. He contends that the "massive realism'...of the [Gospel] appearances themselves can only be described as visionary with great difficulty – and Luke would certainly reject the description as inappropriate", and that the earliest conception of resurrection in the Jerusalem Christian community was physical. [58] Similarly, Helmut Koester writes that the stories of the resurrection were originally epiphanies in which the disciples are called to a ministry by the risen Jesus and were interpreted as physical proof of the event at a secondary stage. He contends that the more detailed accounts of the resurrection are also secondary and do not come from historically trustworthy sources, but instead belong to the genre of the narrative types. [59]

N. T. Wright argues that the account of the empty tomb and the visionary experiences point towards the historical reality of the resurrection. [60] He suggests that multiple lines of evidence from the New Testament and the early Christian beliefs it reflects shows that it would be highly unlikely that belief in the empty tomb would simply appear without a clear basis in the memory of early Christians. In tandem with the visionary experiences of the early disciples and apostles, Jesus' resurrection as a historical reality becomes far more plausible. Contrary to various theologians and historians in recent decades, Wright treats the resurrection as a historical and accessible event, rather than as a 'supernatural' or 'metaphysical' event. Among Wright's critics, author and professor Lawrence Shapiro states that "evidence for the resurrection is nowhere near as complete or convincing as the evidence on which historians rely to justify belief in other historical events such as the destruction of Pompeii." [61]

Referring to Sanders' "agnosticism," Christian apologist Andrew Loke, from the Hong Kong Centre for Christian Apologetics, argues that the myriad of alternative naturalistic theories concerning Jesus' post-mortem appearances can be reduced to essentially six possible categories, viz. legends, no experience, intramental, mistaken identity, swoon, escape, and that all these alternatives and their combinations can be excluded on the basis of historical considerations. [62] Loke argues that the historical evidence is already sufficient to indicate that there were people in mid-1st century AD who claimed that they had seen Jesus alive after his crucifixion, they truly saw something, what they saw was not caused intramentally but extramentally, and the extramental entity was not anyone else but the same Jesus who died on the cross, therefore Jesus resurrected. [63]

See also

Notes

  1. ↑ Paul informs his readers that he is passing on what he has been told, "that Christ died for our sins according to the Scriptures, that he was buried, that he was raised on the third day according to the Scriptures, and that he appeared to Cephas, and then to the Twelve. After that, he appeared to more than five hundred of the brothers and sisters at the same time, most of whom are still living, though some have fallen asleep. Then he appeared to James, then to all the apostles, and last of all he appeared to me also, as to one abnormally born."
  2. ↑ The author of the Gospel of Luke is anonymous; [30] the traditional view that it was Luke the Evangelist, the companion of Paul, is still occasionally put forward, but the scholarly consensus emphasises the many contradictions between Acts and the authentic Pauline letters. [31] [32]
  3. ↑ Robert M. Price points to the accounts of Adonis, Apollonius of Tyana, Asclepius, Attis, Empedocles, Hercules, Osiris, Oedipus, Romulus, Tammuz, and others. [46]

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gospel of Mark</span> Book of the New Testament

The Gospel of Mark is the second of the four canonical gospels and of the three synoptic Gospels. It tells of the ministry of Jesus from his baptism by John the Baptist to his death, burial, and the discovery of his empty tomb. There is no miraculous birth or doctrine of divine pre-existence, nor, in the original ending, any post-resurrection appearances of Jesus. It portrays Jesus as a teacher, an exorcist, a healer, and a miracle worker. He refers to himself as the Son of Man. He is called the Son of God, but keeps his messianic nature secret; even his disciples fail to understand him. All this is in keeping with Christian interpretation of prophecy, which is believed to foretell the fate of the messiah as suffering servant. The gospel ends, in its original version, with the discovery of the empty tomb, a promise to meet again in Galilee, and an unheeded instruction to spread the good news of the Resurrection of Jesus.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gospel of Luke</span> Book of the New Testament

The Gospel of Luke tells of the origins, birth, ministry, death, resurrection, and ascension of Jesus Christ. Together with the Acts of the Apostles, it makes up a two-volume work which scholars call Luke–Acts, accounting for 27.5% of the New Testament. The combined work divides the history of first-century Christianity into three stages, with the gospel making up the first two of these – the life of Jesus the Messiah from his birth to the beginning of his mission in the meeting with John the Baptist, followed by his ministry with events such as the Sermon on the Plain and its Beatitudes, and his Passion, death, and resurrection.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Gospel</span> Books which describe the life and teachings of Jesus

Gospel originally meant the Christian message, but in the 2nd century it came to be used also for the books in which the message was set out. In this sense a gospel can be defined as a loose-knit, episodic narrative of the words and deeds of Jesus, culminating in his trial and death and concluding with various reports of his post-resurrection appearances. Modern scholars are cautious of relying on the gospels uncritically, but nevertheless, they provide a good idea of the public career of Jesus, and critical study can attempt to distinguish the original ideas of Jesus from those of the later authors.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Mary Magdalene</span> Follower of Jesus

Mary Magdalene was a woman who, according to the four canonical gospels, traveled with Jesus as one of his followers and was a witness to his crucifixion and resurrection. She is mentioned by name twelve times in the canonical gospels, more than most of the apostles and more than any other woman in the gospels, other than Jesus's family. Mary's epithet Magdalene may mean that she came from the town of Magdala, a fishing town on the western shore of the Sea of Galilee in Roman Judea.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Resurrection of Jesus</span> Christian belief that God raised Jesus after his crucifixion

The resurrection of Jesus is the Christian belief that God raised Jesus on the third day after his crucifixion, starting – or restoring – his exalted life as Christ and Lord. According to the New Testament writing, Jesus was firstborn from the dead, ushering in the Kingdom of God. He appeared to his disciples, calling the apostles to the Great Commission of proclaiming the Gospel of eternal salvation through his death and resurrection, and ascended to Heaven.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Last Supper</span> Meal that Jesus shared with his apostles before his crucifixion

The Last Supper is the final meal that, in the Gospel accounts, Jesus shared with his apostles in Jerusalem before his crucifixion. The Last Supper is commemorated by Christians especially on Holy Thursday. The Last Supper provides the scriptural basis for the Eucharist, also known as "Holy Communion" or "The Lord's Supper".

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Empty tomb</span> Christian tradition about the tomb of Jesus

The empty tomb is the Christian tradition that the tomb of Jesus was found empty on the third day after his crucifixion. All four canonical gospels relay the story, but beyond a basic outline, they agree on little.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jesus in Christianity</span> Jesus as viewed in the Christian tradition

Jesus is the Son of God and in mainstream Christian denominations he is God the Son, the second Person in the Trinity. He is believed to be the Jewish messiah who is prophesied in the Hebrew Bible, which is called the Old Testament in Christianity. Through his crucifixion and subsequent resurrection, God offered humans salvation and eternal life, that Jesus died to atone for sin to make humanity right with God.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jewish Christian</span> Pre-Christian breakaway Jewish movement

Jewish Christians were the followers of a Jewish religious sect that emerged in Judea during the late Second Temple period. The Nazarene Jews integrated the belief of Jesus as the prophesied Messiah and his teachings into the Jewish faith, including the observance of the Jewish law. The name may derive from the city of Nazareth, or from prophecies in Isaiah and elsewhere where the verb occurs as a descriptive plural noun, or from both. Jewish Christianity is the foundation of Early Christianity, which later developed into Christianity. Christianity started with Jewish eschatological expectations, and it developed into the worship of a deified Jesus after his earthly ministry, his crucifixion, and the post-crucifixion experiences of his followers. Modern scholarship is engaged in an ongoing debate as to the proper designation for Jesus' first followers. Many see the term Jewish Christians as anachronistic given that there is no consensus on the date of the birth of Christianity. Some modern scholars have suggested the designations "Jewish believers in Jesus" or "Jewish followers of Jesus" as better reflecting the original context.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Jesus</span> Central figure of Christianity

Jesus, also referred to as Jesus Christ or Jesus of Nazareth, was a first-century Jewish preacher and religious leader. He is the central figure of Christianity, the world's largest religion. Most Christians believe he is the incarnation of God the Son and the awaited Messiah prophesied in the Hebrew Bible.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Life of Jesus in the New Testament</span> Life of Jesus as told in the New Testament

The life of Jesus in the New Testament is primarily outlined in the four canonical gospels, which includes his genealogy and nativity, public ministry, passion, prophecy, resurrection and ascension. Other parts of the New Testament – such as the Pauline epistles which were likely written within 20 to 30 years of each other, and which include references to key episodes in Jesus' life, such as the Last Supper, and the Acts of the Apostles, which includes more references to the Ascension episode than the canonical gospels – also expound upon the life of Jesus. In addition to these biblical texts, there are extra-biblical texts that Christians believe make reference to certain events in the life of Jesus, such as Josephus on Jesus and Tacitus on Christ.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Stolen body hypothesis</span> Theory to explain the empty tomb of Jesus

The stolen body hypothesis posits that the body of Jesus Christ was stolen from his burial place. His tomb was found empty not because he was resurrected, but because the body had been hidden somewhere else by the apostles or unknown persons. Both the stolen body hypothesis and the debate over it presume the basic historicity of the gospel accounts of the tomb discovery. The stolen body hypothesis finds the idea that the body was not in the tomb plausible – such a claim could be checked if early Christians made it – but considers it more likely that early Christians had been misled into believing the resurrection by the theft of Jesus's body.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Vision theory of Jesus' appearances</span>

The vision theory or vision hypothesis is a term used to cover a range of theories that question the physical resurrection of Jesus, and suggest that sightings of a risen Jesus were visionary experiences. It was first formulated by David Friedrich Strauss in the 19th century, and has been proposed in several forms by critical contemporary scholarship, including Helmut Koester, Géza Vermes, and Larry Hurtado, and members of the Jesus Seminar such as Gerd Lüdemann.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Post-resurrection appearances of Jesus</span> Earthly appearances of Jesus to his followers after his death and burial

The post-resurrection appearances of Jesus in the canonical gospels are reported to have occurred after Jesus' death, burial and resurrection, but prior to his ascension. Among these sources, most scholars believe the First Epistle to the Corinthians was written first. Most Christians point to the appearances as evidence of his bodily resurrection and identity as Messiah, seated in Heaven on the right hand of God. Others, including Liberal Christians, interpret these accounts as visionary experiences.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Myrrhbearers</span> Women with myrrh who came to the tomb of Christ

In Eastern Orthodox Christian tradition the Myrrhbearers are the individuals mentioned in the New Testament who were directly involved in the burial or who discovered the empty tomb following the resurrection of Jesus. The term traditionally refers to the women with myrrh who came to the tomb of Christ early in the morning to find it empty. In Western Christianity, the two women at the tomb, the Three Marys or other variants are the terms normally used. Also included are Joseph of Arimathea and Nicodemus, who took the body of Jesus down from the cross, embalmed it with myrrh and aloes, wrapped it in clean linen, and placed it in a new tomb..

<span class="mw-page-title-main">1 Corinthians 15</span> Chapter of the New Testament

1 Corinthians 15 is the fifteenth chapter of the First Epistle to the Corinthians in the New Testament of the Christian Bible. It is authored by Paul the Apostle and Sosthenes in Ephesus. The first eleven verses contain the earliest account of the post-resurrection appearances of Jesus in the New Testament. The rest of the chapter stresses the primacy of the resurrection for Christianity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Burial of Jesus</span> Event in the New Testament

The burial of Jesus refers to the burial of the body of Jesus after crucifixion, before the eve of the sabbath described in the New Testament. According to the canonical gospel accounts, he was placed in a tomb by a councillor of the sanhedrin named Joseph of Arimathea. In art, it is often called the Entombment of Christ.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Christianity in the 1st century</span> Christianity-related events during the 1st century

Christianity in the 1st century covers the formative history of Christianity from the start of the ministry of Jesus to the death of the last of the Twelve Apostles and is thus also known as the Apostolic Age. Early Christianity developed out of the eschatological ministry of Jesus. Subsequent to Jesus' death, his earliest followers formed an apocalyptic messianic Jewish sect during the late Second Temple period of the 1st century. Initially believing that Jesus' resurrection was the start of the end time, their beliefs soon changed in the expected Second Coming of Jesus and the start of God's Kingdom at a later point in time.

The historical reliability of the Gospels is the reliability and historic character of the four New Testament gospels as historical documents. While all four canonical gospels contain some sayings and events which may meet one or more of the five criteria for historical reliability used in biblical studies, the assessment and evaluation of these elements is a matter of ongoing debate. Virtually all scholars of antiquity agree that a human Jesus existed, but scholars differ on the historicity of specific episodes described in the biblical accounts of Jesus, and the only two events subject to "almost universal assent" are that Jesus was baptized by John the Baptist and was crucified by the order of the Roman Prefect Pontius Pilate. Elements whose historical authenticity is disputed include the two accounts of the Nativity of Jesus, the miraculous events including the resurrection, and certain details about the crucifixion.

Scholars have given various interpretations of the elements of the Gospel stories.

References

Citations

  1. 1 2 McGrew, Timothy, "Miracles", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Winter 2015 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), http://plato.stanford.edu/entries/miracles/
    Flew, Antony, 1966, God and Philosophy, London: Hutchinson.
    Ehrman, Bart D., 2003, The New Testament: A Historical Introduction to the Early Christian Writings, 3rd ed., New York: Oxford University Press.
    Bradley, Francis Herbert, 1874, “The Presuppositions of Critical History,” in Collected Essays, vol. 1, Oxford, Clarendon Press, 1935.
    McGrew's conclusion: historians work with methodological naturalism, which precludes them from establishing miracles as objective historical facts (Flew 1966: 146; cf. Bradley 1874/1935; Ehrman 2003: 229).
  2. ↑ Bart D. Ehrman (23 September 1999). Jesus: Apocalyptic Prophet of the New Millennium. Oxford University Press. p. 197. ISBN   978-0-19-983943-8. As I've pointed out, the historian cannot say that demons—real live supernatural spirits that invade human bodies—were actually cast out of people, because to do so would be to transcend the boundaries imposed on the historian by the historical method, in that it would require a religious belief system involving a supernatural realm outside of the historian's province.
  3. ↑ Schäfer 2003, p. 72.
  4. ↑ Van Voorst 2000, p. 430.
  5. ↑ Tabor 2013, p. 58.
  6. ↑ Endsjø 2009, p. 145.
  7. ↑ Tabor 2013, p. 54.
  8. 1 2 Cotter 2001, p. 131.
  9. ↑ Cotter 2001, p. 133-135.
  10. ↑ Collins, p. 46.
  11. ↑ De Conick 2006, p. 6.
  12. ↑ Finney 2016, p. 181.
  13. ↑ Finney 2016, p. 183.
  14. ↑ Finney 2016, p. 182.
  15. ↑ Daniel 7:13–14
  16. ↑ Telford 1999, p. 154-155.
  17. ↑ Telford 1999, p. 156.
  18. ↑ Telford 1999, p. 155.
  19. ↑ Cotter 2001, p. 149.
  20. 1 2 Cotter 2001, p. 150.
  21. ↑ Chester 2016, p. 15.
  22. ↑ Chester 2016, p. 15-16.
  23. ↑ Vermes 2001, p. unpaginated.
  24. ↑ Roetzel 2000, p. 1019.
  25. ↑ Martin 1995, p. unpaginated.
  26. ↑ Roetzel 2000, p. 1019-1020.
  27. ↑ 1 Corinthians 15:1–8
  28. 1 2 3 Taylor 2014, p. 374.
  29. ↑ Plevnik 2009, p. 4-6.
  30. ↑ Burkett 2002, p. 196.
  31. ↑ Theissen & Merz 1998, p. 32.
  32. ↑ Ehrman 2005, pp. 172, 235.
  33. ↑ Reddish 2011, p. 13.
  34. ↑ "Jesus and the Eyewitnesses: The Gospels as Eyewitness Testimony". Reformed Faith & Practice. Retrieved 2019-12-01.
  35. ↑ Reddish 2011, p. 188.
  36. ↑ Telford 1999, p. 12,149.
  37. 1 2 3 Telford 1999, p. 149.
  38. ↑ Charlesworth 2008, p. unpaginated.
  39. ↑ Burkett 2002, p. 195.
  40. ↑ Cotter 2001, p. 127.
  41. ↑ McEwen, p. 134.
  42. ↑ Cross & Livingstone 2005, p. 887-888.
  43. ↑ Quast 1991, p. 130.
  44. ↑ Cross & Livingstone 2005, p. 888.
  45. 1 2 Robert M. Price, "The Empty Tomb: Introduction; The Second Life of Jesus." In Price, Robert M.; Lowder, Jeffrey Jay, eds. (2005). The Empty Tomb: Jesus Beyond the Grave . Amherst: Prometheus Books. p.  14. ISBN   1-59102-286-X.
  46. ↑ Robert M. Price, "The Empty Tomb: Introduction; The Second Life of Jesus". In Price, Robert M.; Lowder, Jeffrey Jay, eds. (2005). The Empty Tomb: Jesus Beyond the Grave . Amherst: Prometheus Books. pp.  14–15. ISBN   1-59102-286-X.
  47. ↑ Burridge, R. A. (2006). Gospels. In J. W. Rogerson & Judith M. Lieu (Eds) The Oxford Handbook of Biblical Studies. Oxford: Oxford University Press. p. 437
  48. ↑ Bart Ehrman, From Jesus to Constantine: A History of Early Christianity, Lecture 4: "Oral and Written Traditions about Jesus" [The Teaching Company, 2003].
  49. ↑ Ehrman, Bart D. (25 March 2014). "The Resurrection: What We Cannot Know. Roman Practices of Crucifixion". How Jesus Became God: The Exaltation of a Jewish Preacher from Galilee. HarperCollins. p. 156. ISBN   978-0-06-225219-7.
  50. ↑ Vermes, Geza (2008). The Resurrection: History and Myth. New York: Doubleday. pp. 142–148. ISBN   978-0-7394-9969-6. The quoted material appeared in small caps in Vermes's book.
  51. ↑ Wright, The Resurrection of the Son of God, 272; cf. 321
  52. ↑ Resurrection Research from 1975 to the Present: What are Critical Scholars Saying? Link
  53. ↑ From a debate with Antony Flew on the resurrection of the Jesus. Transcript Archived 2012-04-26 at the Wayback Machine
  54. ↑ Resurrection Research from 1975 to the Present: "Of these scholars, approximately 75% favor one or more of these arguments for the empty tomb, while approximately 25% think that one or more arguments oppose it. Thus, while far from being unanimously held by critical scholars, it may surprise some that those who embrace the empty tomb as a historical fact still comprise a fairly strong majority."
  55. ↑ "Jesus Christ." Encyclopædia Britannica, 2007. Encyclopædia Britannica Online. 10 Jan. 2007
  56. ↑ Sanders, E. P. The Historical Figure of Jesus. New York: Penguin Books, 1993.
  57. ↑ Karkkainen, Veli-Matti (2017). Hope and Community: A Constructive Christian Theology for the Pluralistic World, vol. 5. Wm. B. Eerdmans Publishing Company. p. 84. ISBN   978-1-4674-4874-1 . Retrieved 2 December 2022.
  58. ↑ James D.G. Dunn, Jesus and the Spirit: A Study of the Religious and Charismatic Experience of Jesus and the First Christians as Reflected in the New Testament. Eerdmans, 1997. p. 115, 117.
  59. ↑ Helmut Koester, Introduction to the New Testament, Vol. 2: History and Literature of Early Christianity. Walter de Gruyter, 2000. p. 64-65.
  60. ↑ Wright, N.T. (2003). The Resurrection of the Son of God. Fortress Press. ISBN   9780800626792.
  61. ↑ Shapiro, Lawrence (2016). The Miracle Myth. Columbia University Press. ISBN   9780231542142.
  62. ↑ Loke Andrew. 2020. Investigating the Resurrection of Jesus Christ: A New Transdisciplinary Approach. Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies series. London: Routledge. pp.24-26.
  63. ↑ Loke Andrew. 2020. Investigating the Resurrection of Jesus Christ: A New Transdisciplinary Approach. Routledge New Critical Thinking in Religion, Theology and Biblical Studies series. London: Routledge. p. 199.

Bibliography

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.