Indian Health Service

Last updated

Indian Health Service
Indian Health Service Logo.svg
IHS Logo
Operating Division overview
Formed1955;69 years ago (1955)
Preceding Operating Division
Jurisdiction U.S. federal government
Headquarters5600 Fishers Lane, North Bethesda, Maryland, U.S., 20857
(Rockville mailing address)
Annual budget$5.9 billion (2017)
Operating Division executives
  • Roselyn Tso, Director, Indian Health Service
  • Benjamin Smith, Deputy Director, Indian Health Service
Child Operating Division
Website www.ihs.gov OOjs UI icon edit-ltr-progressive.svg

The Indian Health Service (IHS) is an operating division (OPDIV) within the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS). IHS is responsible for providing direct medical and public health services to members of federally recognized Native American Tribes and Alaska Native people. IHS is the principal federal health care provider and health advocate for American Indian people. [1]

Contents

The IHS provides health care in 37 states to approximately 2.2 million out of 3.7 million American Indians and Alaska Natives (AI/AN). [2] As of April 2017, the IHS consisted of 26 hospitals, 59 health centers, and 32 health stations. Thirty-three urban Indian health projects supplement these facilities with various health and referral services. Several tribes are actively involved in IHS program implementation. [3] Many tribes also operate their health systems independent of IHS. [1] It also provides support to students pursuing medical education to staff Indian health programs. [4]

Formation and mission

The provision of health services to members of federally recognized tribes grew out of the special government-to-government relationship between the federal government and Indian tribes. This relationship, established in 1787, is based on Article I, Section 8 of the Constitution, and has been given form and substance by numerous treaties, laws, Supreme Court decisions, and Executive Orders.

Health services for the needs of American Indian and Alaska Natives in the United States were first provided through the Department of War from the early 19th century until the Office of Indian Affairs came into creation and took over the mission. After the mission again changed departmental authority to the Department of Health, Education, and Welfare's Public Health Service in 1955, the IHS was established. [3]

The original priorities were stated to be

  1. Assemble a competent health staff
  2. Institute extensive curative treatment for the seriously ill
  3. Develop a full-scale prevention program that would reduce the excessive amount of illness and early deaths, especially for preventable diseases [3]

Employment

IHS employs approximately 2,650 nurses, 700 physicians, 700 pharmacists, 100 physician assistants and 300 dentists, as well as a variety of other health professionals such as nutritionists, registered medical-record administrators, therapists, community health representative aides, child health specialists, and environmental engineers and sanitarians. [1] [3] It is one of two federal agencies mandated to use Indian Preference in hiring. This law requires the agency to give preference to qualified Indian applicants before considering non-Indian candidates for employment, although exceptions apply. [5]

IHS draws a large number of its professional employees from the U.S. Public Health Service Commissioned Corps. This is a non-armed service branch of the uniformed services of the United States. Professional categories of IHS Commissioned corps officers include physicians, physician assistants, nurses, dentists, therapists, pharmacists, engineers, environmental health officers, and dietitians. [6]

Many IHS positions are in remote areas as well as its headquarters outside of Rockville, Maryland, and at Phoenix Indian Medical Center in Phoenix, Arizona. In 2007, most IHS job openings were on the Navajo reservation. 71% of IHS employees are American Indian/Alaska Native. [6]

The IHS also hires Native/non-Native American interns, who are referred to as "externs". Participants are paid based on industry standards, according to their experience levels and academic training, but are instead reimbursed for tuition and fees if the externship is used for an academic practical experience requirement. [7]

Legislation

The Snyder Act of 1921 (23 U.S.C. 13) was the first formal legislative authority allowing health services to be provided to Native Americans. [3] [8] In 1957, the Indian Facilities Act authorized funding for community hospital construction. This authority was expanded in 1959 with the Indian Sanitation and Facilities Act, which also authorized construction and maintenance of sanitation facilities for Native American homes, communities, and lands. [3]

Indian Self-Determination Act of 1975 (Public Law 93-638)

ExpectMore.gov lists four rated areas of IHS: federally administered activities (moderately effective), healthcare-facilities construction (effective), resource- and patient-management systems (effective), and sanitation-facilities construction (moderately effective). All federally recognized Native American and Alaska Natives are entitled to health care. This health care is provided by the Indian Health Service, either through IHS-run hospitals and clinics or tribal contracts to provide healthcare services. [6]

Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976 (Public Law 94-437)

The passing of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976 expanded the budget of the IHS to expand health services. The IHS was able to build and renovate medical facilities and focus on the construction of safe drinking water and sanitary disposal facilities. The law also developed programs designed to increase the number of Native American professionals and improve urban Natives' health care access. [3]

Other legislation

Title V of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act of 1976 and Title V of the Indian Health Care Amendment of 1980 have increased the access to healthcare Native Americans living in urban areas receive. The IHS now contracts with urban Indian health organizations in various US cities in order to expand outreach, referral services, and comprehensive healthcare services. [3]

Administration

IHS headquarters at 5600 Fishers Lane in Rockville, Maryland 5600 Fishers Lane 2020a.jpg
IHS headquarters at 5600 Fishers Lane in Rockville, Maryland

The Indian Health Service is headed by a director; As of 27 September 2022, the current director is Roselyn Tso.

Reporting to the director are a chief medical officer (Dr. Loretta Christensen, M.D. as of 2022), deputy directors (Field Operations, Intergovernmental Affairs, Management Operations, and Quality Health Care), and Offices for Tribal Self-Governance, Urban Indian Health Programs, and Direct Service and Contracting Tribes. Twelve regional area offices each coordinate infrastructure and programs in a section of the United States. [9]

A 2010 report by Senate Committee on Indian Affairs Chairman Byron Dorgan, D-N.D., found that the Aberdeen Area of the IHS is in a "chronic state of crisis". [10] "Serious management problems and a lack of oversight of this region have adversely affected the access and quality of health care provided to Native Americans in the Aberdeen Area, which serves 18 tribes in the states of North Dakota, South Dakota, Nebraska and Iowa," according to the report.

Between 2015 and 2017, the agency saw five different directors. Rear Admiral Chris Buchanan, a Seminole, served as acting director from January–June 2017. [11] [12] Prior to Buchanan, the office was headed by attorney Mary L. Smith (Cherokee). [13] Yvette Roubideaux (Rosebud Sioux), was appointed director of IHS by President Obama in 2009; she was re-nominated for a second four-year term in 2013 but was not re-confirmed by the Senate. [14] After she stepped down in 2015, she was briefly replaced by Robert McSwain (Mono). [15] Roubideaux was also preceded by McSwain, who had served as director for eight months. [16] Trump's nominee for the post, Robert M. Weaver of the Quapaw Tribe, withdrew from consideration after questions arose about his resume. In June 2017, HHS Secretary Alex Azar appointed Rear Admiral Michael D. Weahkee, a Zuni, to be acting director. [11]

In July 2017, Weahkee was severely chastised during the United States Senate Appropriations Subcommittee on Interior, Environment, and Related Agencies budget hearings by Senator Jon Tester. [17] Weahkee refused to answer repeated direct questions about whether the 2018 IHS budget proposal was adequate to fulfill the Service's remit. In the December 11, 2019 Senate Committee on Indian Affairs hearing on the nomination of Weahkee as director of the Indian Health Service, Sen. Tester, a former chairman and former vice chairman of the committee, told Weahkee, "I think you're going to get confirmed ... And you should get confirmed." [18] Weahkee was finally confirmed to the post on April 21, 2020, by a voice vote in the Senate. [19] In a letter dated January 11, 2021, Weahkee informed tribal and urban Indian leaders that he had been asked to tender his resignation by January 20, "to allow the incoming administration to appoint new leadership". [20]

In 2009, Indian Health Service pediatrician Stanley Patrick Weber was accused of sexually abusing boys under his care at IHS facilities across a two-decade span. Weber resigned in 2016 and in 2020 was sentenced to five life terms in prison for the crimes. A 2019 report commissioned by IHS found that IHS officials did not properly investigate or follow up on the accusations against Weber, promoting him to medical director of the IHS hospital in Pine Ridge, South Dakota after the accusations were made. [21]

In January 2021, Elizabeth Fowler of the Comanche Nation, was named as Acting Director. Ms Fowler had been Executive Director of the IHS Oklahoma City Area since 2019. [22] The current director, Roselyn Tso, was nominated to the position by President Joe Biden in May 2022, and was confirmed by the United States Senate in September 2022.

Areas

A network of twelve regional offices oversee clinical operations for individual facilities and funds. As of 2010, the federally operated sites included 28 hospitals and 89 outpatient facilities. [23]

Graphic from the Government Accountability Office showing the patient populations per service area for the year 2014 Figure 1- Indian Health Service Patient Population by Area, Calendar Year 2014 (31640342914) (cropped).jpg
Graphic from the Government Accountability Office showing the patient populations per service area for the year 2014

Services and benefits

The IHS provides a variety of health services in outpatient and inpatient settings, with benefits including pharmacy, dental, behavioral health, immunizations, pediatrics, physical rehabilitation, and optometry. [36] A more extensive list can be found at the official IHS website, and it is recommended for patients to contact their particular IHS facility to confirm services provided since benefits may differ by location. [36]

Eligibility

To qualify for health benefits from the IHS, individuals must be of American Indian and/or Alaska Native descent and be a part of an Indian community serviced by IHS. Individuals must be able to provide evidence such as membership in a federally recognized tribe, residence on tax-exempt land, or active participation in tribal affairs. Federally recognized tribes are annually defined by the Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA). Non-Indians can also receive care if they are the child of an eligible Indian, the spouse (including same-sex spouses) of an eligible Indian, or a non-Indian woman pregnant with an eligible Indian's child. The exact policy can be found in the IHS Indian Health Manual (IHM). [37]

To apply for benefits through the IHS, individuals can enroll through the patient registration office of their local IHS facility. Individuals should be prepared to show proof of enrollment in a federally recognized tribe. [38]

Direct Care versus Purchased/Referred Care (PRC)

"Direct Care" refers to medical and dental care that American Indians and Alaska Natives receive at an IHS or tribal medical facility. [39] [40] If patients are referred to a non-IHS/tribal medical facility, there is the option to request for coverage via the IHS "Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) Program". [39] [40] Due to limited funds from U.S. Congress, referrals through PRC are not guaranteed coverage. [39] [40] [41] Authorization of these payments are determined through several factors, including confirmation of AI/AN tribal affiliation, medical priority, and funding availability. [39] [40] [41]

IHS National Core Formulary

The IHS National Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee (NPTC) is composed of administrative leaders and clinical professionals, including pharmacists and physicians, who regulate the IHS National Core Formulary (NCF) to reflect current clinical practices and literature. [42] The NCF is reviewed every quarter and revised as needed based on arising health needs within the Native American communities, pharmacoeconomic analyses, recent guidelines, national contracts, and clinician advice. [42] Fibric acid derivatives and niacin extended release were removed from the formulary in February 2017, [42] but there were no changes made to the NCF during the May 2017 meeting. [43] The complete National Core Formulary can be found on the IHS website. [42]

Necessity for hepatitis C coverage

The National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey provides national prevalence data for hepatitis C but excludes several high risk populations including federal prisoners, homeless individuals and over one million Native Americans residing on reservations. [44] To address this concern, in 2012 IHS implemented a nationwide hepatitis C virus (HCV) antibody testing program for persons born between 1945 and 1965. This resulted in a fourfold increase in the number of patients screened. [45] IHS facilities of the Southwest reported the largest gains in number of patients tested and the percentage of eligible patients that received testing. [45] Currently, the incidence rate of acute hepatitis C in Native Americans is higher in comparison to any other racial/ethnic group (1.32 cases per 100,000). [46] Additionally, Native Americans have the highest rate of hepatitis C related deaths (12.95% in 2015) in comparison to any other racial/ethnic group. [47]

Despite this prevalent need, IHS currently does not include any new direct acting anti-retroviral (DAA) hepatitis C medications on its National Core Formulary. [48] [ original research? ] New DAA drugs provide a cure to hepatitis C in most cases but are costly. [49] Due to their lack in funding and quality of care, the IHS has not been able to effectively combat the Native American HCV issue, unlike the Veterans Affairs system, which was able to eradicate much of the disease through adequate resources from the federal government.[ citation needed ]

Scholarships

The IHS offers three types of scholarships to Native American students pursuing an education in healthcare: [4] Preparatory Scholarship, Pre-Graduate Scholarship, and Health Professions Scholarship. The Health Professions Scholarship commits undergraduate and graduate students to a full-time service commitment after their professional training. [4] These scholarships help to staff Indian health programs with Native American professionals. [4] In addition, the IHS's Indians Into Medicine (INMED) program offers grants to universities to support Native American students in their medical education through mentorship, tutoring, financial aid, and more. [50] It has also been used to support and encourage students before college to take pre-medical courses. [50]

Tribal self-determination

Notable self-determination legislation

In 1954, the Indian Health Transfer Act included language that recognizing tribal sovereignty and the Act additionally "afforded a degree of tribal self-determination in health policy decision-making." [51] The Indian Self Determination and Education Assistance Act (ISDEAA) allows for tribes to request self-determination contracts with the Secretaries of Interior and Health and Human Services. The tribes take over IHS activities and services through an avenue called ‘638 contracts’ through which tribes receive the IHS funds that would have been used for IHS health services and instead manage and use this money for the administration of health services outside of the IHS. [51]

Self-determination successes and concerns

The benefits and drawbacks of Tribal Self Determination have been widely debated. Many tribes have successfully implemented elements of health-related Self Determination. An example is the Cherokee Indian Hospital in North Carolina. This community-based hospital, funded in part by the tribe's casino revenues, is guided by four core principles: "The one who helps you from the heart", "A state of peace and balance", "it belongs to you" and "Like family to me" "He, she, they, are like my own family". [52] The hospital is based on the adoption of an Alaska Native model of healthcare called the "Nuka System of Care", a framework that focuses on patient-centered, self-determined health service delivery that heavily relies on Patient participation.

The Nuka System of Care was developed by the Southcentral Foundation in 1982, a non-profit healthcare organization that is owned and composed of Alaska Natives. [53] The Nuka System's vision is "A Native community that enjoys physical, mental, emotional and spiritual wellness". [53] Every Alaska Native in the health system is a "customer-owner" of the system and participates as a self-determined individual who has a say in the decision-making processes and access to an intimate, integrated, long-term care team. When a customer-owner seeks care, their primary care doctor's foremost responsibility is to build a strong and lasting relationship with the beneficiary, and customer-owners have various options through which they can give input and participate in decisions about their health. These options include surveys, focus groups, special events and committees. [53] The board is made up entirely of Alaska Natives who helped design the system and actively participate in running it effectively. [53] Following the implementation of the Nuka System of Care in Alaska Native health, successes in improved standards of care have been achieved, such as increases in the number of Alaska Natives with a primary care provider, in childhood immunization rates, and customers satisfaction in regard to respect of culture and traditions. In addition, decreases in wait times for appointments, wait lists, emergency department and urgent care visits, and staff turnover have been reported. [53] The North Carolina Cherokee Indian Hospital in 2012 as well as other tribes have implemented the Nuka System approach when planning their new or revamped health centers and systems.

Some tribes are less optimistic about the role of Self Determination in Indian healthcare or may face barriers to success. Tribes have expressed concern that the 638 contracting and compacting could lead to "termination by appropriation", the fear that if tribes take over the responsibility of managing healthcare programs and leave the federal government with only the job of funding these programs, then the federal government could easily "deny any further responsibility for the tribes, and cut funding". [54] The fear of potential termination has led some tribes to refuse to participate in Self Determination contracting without a clear resolution of this issue. [55] Some tribes also renounce Self Determination and contracting because of the chronic underfunding of IHS programs. They do not see any benefit in being handed the responsibility of a "sinking ship" [54] due to the lack of a satisfactory budget for IHS services. Other tribes face various barriers to successful Self Determination. Small tribes lacking in administrative capabilities, geographically isolated tribes with transportation and recruitment issues, and tribes with funding issues may find it much harder to contract with the IHS and begin self-determination. [55] Poverty and a lack of resources can thus make Self Determination difficult. [56]

Budget

The IHS receives funding as allocated by the United States Congress and is not an entitlement program, insurance program, or established benefit program. [57]

The 2017 United States federal budget includes $5.1 billion for the IHS to support and expand the provision of health care services and public health programs for American Indians and Alaska Natives. The proposed 2018 budget proposes to reduce IHS spending by more than $300 million. [58]

This covers the provision of health benefits to 2.5 million Native Americans and Alaskan Natives for a recent average cost per patient of less than $3,000, far less than the average cost of health care nationally ($7,700), or for the other major federal health programs Medicaid ($6,200) or Medicare ($12,000). [59]

Affordable Care Act

An integral focus of economic and health policy for Native American healthcare is Medicaid. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA) of 2010, states could choose to expand Medicaid benefits. [60] Many Native Americans stood to benefit from this expansion of healthcare coverage. [60] IHS and tribal facilities rely on beneficiaries like Medicaid to help cover the Congressional underfunding of the IHS itself. [60] During the formation of the ACA, tribal leaders pushed for the reauthorization of the Indian Health Care Improvement Act and further provisions for AI/NA recipients, which facilitated IHS Medicaid funding. [61] The ACA also authorized funding to support residency training programs in tribal or IHS facilities through teaching health centers (THCs). [62] Such initiatives support provider retention as a greater percentage of graduates from these THCs chose to work in rural and underserved settings compared to the national average. [62] Expansion of Medicaid under the ACA is dependent on whether or not the state authorizes it. [60] If states do not approve expansion, fewer people receive comprehensive coverage and IHS and tribal facilities do not receive the extra sources of funding. [60] The IHS and tribal clinics can direct money toward provider recruitment with better reimbursement for patient services. [60]

Opponents of using Medicaid to alleviate health inequalities argue that it takes responsibility away from the government to provide comprehensive health services. They argue that underfunding of the IHS would still be persistent and possibly intensify under Medicaid expansion as patients go to private providers. [61] Some tribal members assert that provisions under Medicaid are not what was promised to the Native American people as they are based on expanding affordability via insurance and not on providing comprehensive health services that are fully covered. [61] By relying on services reimbursed by Medicaid, this increases participation in private health services instead of public. [61] Due to the rural nature of reservations and lack of communication about the system, the enrollment and logistical processes involved in having Medicaid can also pose a barrier to Native Americans signing up, and disrupt members' eligibility status. [63] Some proposed that to avoid these disruptions, the federal money from Medicaid directed to tribe members could be directed straight to the IHS budget, allowing funding to go directly to tribes and giving them say over eligibility. [60]

In 2011, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services developed a mandate for tribal consultation regarding policy action in an effort to improve the quality of care for tribes. [64] Another economic proposition to improve healthcare is to surpass consultation status for tribes when it comes to Medicaid policy and make them integral to the final decision making. [60] This would help ensure that Medicaid programs are culturally aware and can treat behavioral medical issues better. [63]

Current issues

Life expectancy for Native Americans is approximately 4.5 years less than the general population of the United States (73.7 years versus 78.1 years). [1] Native communities face higher rates of chronic diseases like cancer, diabetes, and kidney disease. [65] This is contributed to by the lack of public health infrastructure as well as the considerable distance to healthcare facilities for rural residents. [66]

In 2013, the IHS experienced funding cuts of $800 million, representing a substantial percentage of its budget. [67] [68] Over the past twenty years, the gap between spending on federally recognized American Indian/Alaska Natives and spending on Medicare beneficiaries has grown eightfold. [69] This inequity has a large impact on service rationing, health disparities and life expectancy, and can lead to preventive services being neglected. Other issues that have been highlighted as challenges to improving health outcomes are social inequities such as poverty and unemployment, cross-cultural communication barriers, and limited access to care. [70]

Data from the 2014 National Emergency Department Inventory survey showed that only 85% of the 34 IHS respondents had continuous physician coverage. [71] Of these 34 sites, only 4 sites utilized telemedicine [71] while a median of just 13% of physicians were board certified in emergency medicine. [71] The majority of IHS emergency department from the survey reported operating at or over capacity. [71] Tribal reservations are often sequestered in unfavorable and isolated locations. [72] According to a study of provider vacancies in the IHS, conducted by the Department of Health and Human Services (2016), about half of the clinics studied identified their remote location as a large obstacle for hiring and retaining staff. [72] Issues surrounding isolation, lack of shopping centers, schools, and entertainment also dissuades providers from moving to these areas. Such vacancies lead to cutting of patient services, delays in treatment, and negative effects on employee morale. [73] Studies show that such problems surrounding Native Americans and reservation inequality may be addressed by growing a Native American healthcare workforce. [74]

Since its beginnings in 1955, the IHS has been criticized by those it serves in medical deserts and by public officials. [75] [76] [77] [78]

Individuals who are not of citizens of federally recognized tribe or who live in urban areas may have trouble accessing the services of the IHS. [3]

See also

Related Research Articles

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Bureau of Indian Affairs</span> US government agency

The Bureau of Indian Affairs (BIA), also known as Indian Affairs (IA), is a United States federal agency within the Department of the Interior. It is responsible for implementing federal laws and policies related to Native Americans and Alaska Natives, and administering and managing over 55,700,000 acres (225,000 km2) of reservations held in trust by the U.S. federal government for indigenous tribes. It renders services to roughly 2 million indigenous Americans across 574 federally recognized tribes. The BIA is governed by a director and overseen by the Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs, who answers to the Secretary of the Interior.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Rosebud Indian Reservation</span> Indian reservation in South Dakota, United States

The Rosebud Indian Reservation is an Indian reservation in South Dakota, United States. It is the home of the federally recognized Rosebud Sioux Tribe, who are Sicangu, a band of Lakota people. The Lakota name Sicangu Oyate translates as the "Burnt Thigh Nation", also known by the French term, the Brulé Sioux.

The Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium (ANTHC) is a non-profit health organization based in Anchorage, Alaska, which provides health services to 158,000 Alaska Natives and American Indians in Alaska. Established in 1997, ANTHC is a consortium of the tribal regional health organizations. The board of directors for ANTHC equally represent all tribal regions of Alaska and each region has parity.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Modern social statistics of Native Americans</span>

Modern social statistics of Native Americans serve as defining characteristics of Native American life, and can be compared to the average United States citizens’ social statistics. Areas from their demographics and economy to health standards, drug and alcohol use, and land use and ownership all lead to a better understanding of Native American life. Health standards for Native Americans have notable disparities from that of all United States racial and ethnic groups. They have higher rates of disease, higher death rates, and a lack of medical coverage.

Southcentral Foundation (SCF) is an Alaska Native healthcare organization established by Cook Inlet Region, Inc. (CIRI) in 1982. Its objective is to improve the health and social conditions of Alaska Native and American Indian people by promoting cultural values and empowering individuals and families to lead healthier lives. SCF operates under the ownership, management, and guidance of Alaska Native and American Indian communities, emphasizing their direct involvement in decision-making processes.

The Alaska Native Medical Center (ANMC) is a non-profit health center based in Anchorage, Alaska, United States, which provides medical services to 158,000 Alaska Natives and other Native Americans in Alaska. It acts as both the secondary and tertiary care referral hospital for the Alaska Region of the Indian Health Service (IHS). Established in 1997, ANMC is jointly owned and managed by the Alaska Native Tribal Health Consortium and Southcentral Foundation as well as tribal governments, and their regional health organizations.

The practice of dental care in rural Alaska is overseen by the American Dental Association and other organizations under the jurisdiction of dentistry in the United States, with major differences from dentistry in the contiguous states. The oral health situation among the Alaskan Native population is among the most severe globally, with notably high rates of oral disease. Children in this population aged 2 to 5 years have almost five times the amount of tooth decay as children of the same age elsewhere in the United States, and adults have 2.5 times the amount of tooth decay as adults elsewhere. Other factors impacting the population's dental health include the difficulty of obtaining fresh food in remote locations, lack of fluoridated running water, and reduced access to education on the importance of dental health.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Yvette Roubideaux</span> American physician

Yvette Roubideaux is an American doctor and public health administrator. She is a member of the Rosebud Sioux Tribe of South Dakota.

The Northwest Portland Area Indian Health Board (NPAIHB) is a non-profit tribal advisory organization in Portland, Oregon, run and organized by participating tribes. It was established in 1972 to focus on four areas as they pertain to the health of Native people: health promotion and disease prevention, legislative and policy analysis, training and technical assistance, and surveillance and research. It serves 43 federally recognized tribes in Oregon, Washington and Idaho, with each tribe appointing a delegate to the board that oversees the NPAIHB. The board meets quarterly to discuss current projects and issues.

Southeast Alaska Regional Health Consortium (SEARHC) is a non-profit medical, dental, vision and mental health organization serving the health interests of the residents of Southeast Alaska.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Native Americans and reservation inequality</span> Social issue in the U.S.

Native American reservation inequality underlies a range of societal issues that affect the lives of Native American populations residing on reservations in the United States. About one third of the Native American population, about 700,000 people, lives on an Indian Reservation in the United States. Reservation poverty and other discriminatory factors have led to persisting social inequality on Native American reservations. Disparities between many aspects of life at the national level and at the reservation level, such as quality of education, quality of healthcare, substance use disorders, teenage pregnancy, violence, and suicide rates are significant in demonstrating the inequality of opportunities and situations between reservations and the rest of the country.

Contemporary Native American issues in the United States are topics arising in the late 20th century and early 21st century which affect Native Americans in the United States. Many issues stem from the subjugation of Native Americans in society, including societal discrimination, racism, cultural appropriation through sports mascots, and depictions in art. Native Americans have also been subject to substantial historical and intergenerational trauma that have resulted in significant public health issues like alcohol use disorder and risk of suicide.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Sterilization of Native American women</span> Controversial medical practice in USA

In the 1960s and 1970s, the Indian Health Service (IHS) and collaborating physicians sustained a practice of performing sterilizations on Native American women, in many cases without the free and informed consent of their patients. In some cases, women were misled into believing that the sterilization procedure was reversible. In other cases, sterilization was performed without the adequate understanding and consent of the patient, including cases in which the procedure was performed on minors as young as 11 years old. A compounding factor was the tendency of doctors to recommend sterilization to poor and minority women in cases where they would not have done so to a wealthier white patient. Other cases of abuse have been documented as well, including when health providers did not tell women they were going to be sterilized, or other forms of coercion including threatening to take away their welfare or healthcare.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Native American policy of the Barack Obama administration</span>

The United States public policy agenda on issues affecting Native Americans under the Obama administration includes the signing of the Tribal Law and Order Act of 2010, which allowed tribal courts to extend and expand sentences handed down to them in criminal cases, strengthening tribal autonomy. Obama also supported and enforced the Executive Order 13175, which requires the federal government to consult with tribal governments when deliberating over policies and programs that would affect tribal communities. Under the Obama Administration was also the launching of Michelle Obama's program Let's Move In Indian Country, which aims to improve opportunities for physical activity, to increase access to healthy food in tribal communities, and to create collaborations between private and public sectors to build programs that will end childhood obesity in Native communities. Obama also supported tribal communities through certain provisions of the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, which allocated $510 million for rehabilitation of Native American housing, and the settlement of the Keepseagle case, a lawsuit against the United States Department of Agriculture for discriminating against tribal communities by not allowing them equal access to the USDA Farm Loan Program. Most recently, Obama signed Executive Order 13592, which seeks to improve educational opportunities for American Indian and Alaska Natives. Obama has been praised by many tribal leaders, including those who claim he has done more for Native Americans than all of his predecessors combined.

The Native American Health Center (NAHC) is a non-profit organization serving California's San Francisco Bay Area Native Population and other under-served populations in the Bay Area since 1972.

Suicide among Native Americans in the United States, both attempted and completed, is more prevalent than in any other racial or ethnic group in the United States. Among American youths specifically, Native American youths also show higher rates of suicide than American youths of other races. Despite making up only 0.9% of the total United States population, American Indians and Alaska Natives (AIANs) are a significantly heterogeneous group, with 560 federally recognized tribes, more than 200 non-federally recognized tribes, more than 300 languages spoken, and one half or more of them living in urban areas. Suicide rates are likewise variable within AIAN communities. Reported rates range from 0 to 150 per 100,000 members of the population for different groups. Native American men are more likely to commit suicide than Native American women, but Native American women show a higher prevalence of suicidal behaviors. Interpersonal relationships, community environment, spirituality, mental healthcare, and alcohol abuse interventions are among subjects of studies about the effectiveness of suicide prevention efforts. David Lester calls attention to the existence and importance of theories of suicide developed by indigenous peoples themselves, and notes that they "can challenge traditional Western theories of suicide." Studies by Olson and Wahab as well as Doll and Brady report that the Indian Health Service has lacked the resources needed to sufficiently address mental health problems in Native American communities. The most complete records of suicide among Native Americans in the United States are reported by the Indian Health Service.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Medical deserts in the United States</span> Areas with limited access to healthcare in the United States

The United States has many regions which have been described as medical deserts, with those locations featuring inadequate access to one or more kinds of medical services. An estimated thirty million Americans, many in rural regions of the country, live at least a sixty-minute drive from a hospital with trauma care services. Regions with higher rates of Medicaid and Medicare patients, as well those who lack any health insurance coverage, are less likely to live within an hour of a hospital emergency room. Although concentrated in rural regions, health care deserts also exist in urban and suburban areas, particularly in predominantly Black communities in Chicago, Los Angeles and New York City. Racial demographic disparities in healthcare access are also present in rural areas, particularly in Native American communities which experience worse health outcomes and barriers to accessing quality medical care. Limited access to emergency room services, as well as medical specialists, leads to increases in mortality rates and long-term health problems, such as heart disease and diabetes.

<span class="mw-page-title-main">Impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Native American tribes and tribal communities</span> Effects of the viral outbreak on tribal communities

The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on Native American tribes and tribal communities has been severe and has emphasized underlying inequalities in Native American communities compared to the majority of the American population. The pandemic exacerbated existing healthcare and other economic and social disparities between Native Americans and other racial and ethnic groups in the United States. Along with black Americans, Latinos, and Pacific Islanders, the death rate in Native Americans due to COVID-19 was twice that of white and Asian Americans, with Native Americans having the highest mortality rate of all racial and ethnic groups nationwide. As of January 5, 2021, the mortality impact in Native American populations from COVID-19 was 1 in 595 or 168.4 deaths in 100,000, compared to 1 in 1,030 for white Americans and 1 in 1,670 for Asian Americans. Prior to the pandemic, Native Americans were already at a higher risk for infectious disease and mortality than any other group in the United States.

Native Americans are affected by noncommunicable illnesses related to social changes and contemporary eating habits. Increasing rates of obesity, poor nutrition, sedentary lifestyle, and social isolation affect many Americans. While subject to the same illnesses, Native Americans have higher morbidity and mortality to diabetes and cardiovascular disease as well as certain forms of cancer. Social and historical factors tend to promote unhealthy behaviors including suicide and alcohol dependence. Reduced access to health care in Native American communities means that these diseases as well as infections affect more people for longer periods of time.

Becerra v. San Carlos Apache Tribe, 602 U.S. ___ (2024), was a United States Supreme Court case which determined that the federal government must provide additional funding to cover some third-party administrative costs incurred by Native American tribes that operate their own health-care programs.

References

  1. 1 2 3 4 "Quick Look". Newsroom. Indian Health Service. April 2017. Archived from the original on May 1, 2017. Retrieved October 11, 2022.
  2. ↑ "About IHS". Indian Health Service. Archived from the original on September 3, 2022. Retrieved October 11, 2022.
  3. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 Champagne, Duane, ed. (2001). The Native North American ALmanac (2nd ed.). Farmingtom Hills, Michigan: Gale Group. pp. 943–945. ISBN   0787616559 – via Internet Archive.
  4. 1 2 3 4 "Scholarships". Indian Health Service. Retrieved May 11, 2021.
  5. ↑ "Chapter 3 - Indian Preference | Part 7". The Indian Health Manual (IHM). December 22, 2008. Retrieved June 21, 2024.
  6. 1 2 3 "The Indian Health Service Fact Sheets". info.ihs.gov. Archived from the original on April 23, 2008. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  7. ↑ "IHS Extern Program". IHS Scholarship Program. Retrieved October 21, 2019.
  8. ↑ "Legislation | About IHS". About IHS. Retrieved November 4, 2018.
  9. ↑ "Indian Health Service chart" (PDF). www.ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  10. ↑ "Dorgan: Investigation shows Indian Health Service in Aberdeen area is in a "chronic state of crisis"". www.indian.senate.gov. Archived from the original on February 3, 2011. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  11. 1 2 "RADM Michael D. Weahkee, acting director, Indian Health Service" (PDF). www.ihs.giv. June 2017. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  12. ↑ "Key Leaders | About IHS". Ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  13. ↑ "Acting Director of the Indian Health Service: Who Is Mary L. Smith?". AllGov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  14. ↑ "Roubideaux, For Now, Forced Out of IHS Leadership - Indian Country Media Network". indiancountrymedianetwork.com.
  15. ↑ "Robert G. McSwain, M.P.A., Director, Office of Management Services, Indian Health Service" (PDF). www.ihs.gov. March 2016. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  16. ↑ "New IHS director faced difficult year - Indian Country Media Network". indiancountrymedianetwork.com.
  17. ↑ "Tester questions acting Indian Health Service director about proposed budget". www.ktvq.com. MTN News. July 12, 2017. Archived from the original on October 17, 2017. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  18. ↑ Agoyo, Acee. "Trump's nominee for Indian Health Service promises positive changes". Indianz. Retrieved April 3, 2020.
  19. ↑ "PN1250 - Nomination of Michael D. Weahkee for Department of Health and Human Services, 116th Congress (2019-2020)". www.congress.gov. April 21, 2020. Retrieved July 7, 2021.
  20. ↑ Native News Online Staff. "Indian Health Service Director Michael Weahkee Asked to Resign by the Biden Transition Team". Native News Online. Retrieved July 7, 2021.
  21. ↑ Weaver, Christopher; Frosch, Dan (October 11, 2021). "Indian Health Service Managers Protected a Pedophile in Their Midst. Now the Agency Is Protecting Them". Wall Street Journal. Retrieved October 13, 2021.
  22. ↑ "Elizabeth A. Fowler" (PDF). Indian Health Service. April 2022.
  23. ↑ Sequist, T. D.; Cullen, T.; Acton, K. J. (2011). "Indian Health Service Innovations Have Helped Reduce Health Disparities Affecting American Indian And Alaska Native People". Health Affairs. 30 (10): 1965–1973. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0630 . PMID   21976341.
  24. ↑ Alaska area Retrieved 2011-04-08.
  25. ↑ Albuquerque area Retrieved 2011-04-08.
  26. ↑ "Albuquerque Area". Indian Health Services. Retrieved May 21, 2020.
  27. ↑ California area Archived 2008-04-12 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 2011-04-08.
  28. ↑ Great Plains area Retrieved 2017-07-13.
  29. ↑ Nashville area Retrieved 2011-04-08.
  30. ↑ "Biography - Martha Ketcher" (PDF). Indian Health Service. Retrieved March 29, 2013.[ permanent dead link ]
  31. ↑ Retrieved 2024-08-30.
  32. ↑
  33. ↑ Oklahoma area Archived 2008-03-02 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 2011-04-08.
  34. ↑ Phoenix area Archived 2008-03-02 at the Wayback Machine Retrieved 2011-04-08.
  35. ↑ Portland area Retrieved 2011-04-08.
  36. 1 2 "Health Care for Patients". www.ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  37. ↑ "Indian Health Manual". Indian Health Services. June 28, 2017. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  38. ↑ "Frequently Asked Questions". Indian Health Services. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  39. 1 2 3 4 "Purchased/Referred Care". www.ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  40. 1 2 3 4 "Purchased/Referred Care (PRC) for Patients". www.ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  41. 1 2 "Frequently Asked Questions for Patients". www.ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  42. 1 2 3 4 "National Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee". www.ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  43. ↑ "Indian Health Service National Pharmacy and Therapeutics Committee NPTC Spring Meeting Update" (PDF). Indian Health Services. May 2017.
  44. ↑ Holmberg, Scott (May 16, 2013). "Hepatitis C in the United States". The New England Journal of Medicine. 368 (20): 1859–1861. doi:10.1056/NEJMp1302973. PMC   5672915 . PMID   23675657.
  45. 1 2 Bragg, Reiley (May 13, 2016). "Birth Cohort Testing for Hepatitis C Virus — Indian Health Service 2012–2015". Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report. 65 (18): 467–469. doi: 10.15585/mmwr.mm6518a3 . PMID   27171026.
  46. ↑ "American Indians and Alaska Natives". www.cdc.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  47. ↑ "U.S. 2014 Surveillance Data for Viral Hepatitis | Statistics & Surveillance | Division of Viral Hepatitis | CDC". www.cdc.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  48. ↑ "National Core Formulary | National Pharmacy & Therapeutics Committee". www.ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  49. ↑ Smith-Palmer, Jayne; Cerri, Karin; Valentine, William (January 17, 2015). "Achieving sustained virologic response in hepatitis C: a systematic review of the clinical, economic and quality of life benefits". BMC Infectious Diseases. 15: 19. doi: 10.1186/s12879-015-0748-8 . ISSN   1471-2334. PMC   4299677 . PMID   25596623.
  50. 1 2 Indian Health Service. "Indians Into Medicine Program" . Retrieved May 11, 2021.
  51. 1 2 Warne, Donald; Frizzell, Linda Bane (June 2014). "American Indian Health Policy: Historical Trends and Contemporary Issues". American Journal of Public Health. 104 (S3): S263–S267. doi:10.2105/AJPH.2013.301682. ISSN   0090-0036. PMC   4035886 . PMID   24754649.
  52. ↑ "Cherokee Indian Hospital Authority" . Retrieved December 3, 2019.
  53. 1 2 3 4 5 Gottlieb, Katherine (January 31, 2013). "The Nuka System of Care: improving health through ownership and relationships". International Journal of Circumpolar Health. 72 (1): 21118. doi:10.3402/ijch.v72i0.21118. ISSN   2242-3982. PMC   3752290 . PMID   23984269.
  54. 1 2 Sheldon, Brett Lee (February 2004). "Legal and Historical Roots of Health Care for American Indians and Alaska Natives in the United States" (PDF). KFF .
  55. 1 2 "Office of Community Services: Division of Tribal Services: Fact Sheets". doi:10.1037/e312112004-001.{{cite journal}}: Cite journal requires |journal= (help)
  56. ↑ Whitehurst, Lindsay (June 6, 2024). "Supreme Court Sides With Native American Tribes in Dispute". TIME. Retrieved June 7, 2024.
  57. ↑ "Frequently Asked Questions for Patients". www.ihs.gov. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  58. ↑ Udall, Tom (July 12, 2017). "Administration's Indian Health Service Budget 'Cuts The Legs Out' From Native Health Care System". krwg.org. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  59. ↑ "Health care: Budget requests" (PDF). Ncai.org. 2016. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  60. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 Onders, Robert (January 1, 2015). "Medicaid: Can Federal Responsibilities, State Authorities, and Tribal Sovereignty Be Reconciled". Wyoming Law Review. 15 (1): 165–186. doi: 10.59643/1942-9916.1338 . S2CID   153190024.
  61. 1 2 3 4 Skinner, Daniel (February 1, 2016). "The Politics of Native American Health Care and the Affordable Care Act". Journal of Health Politics, Policy and Law. 41 (1): 41–71. doi:10.1215/03616878-3445601. ISSN   0361-6878. PMID   26567380.
  62. 1 2 Tobey, Matthew; Amir, Omar; Beste, Jason; Jung, Paul; Shamasunder, Sriram; Tutt, Michael; Shah, Sachita; Le, Phuoc (2019). "Physician Workforce Partnerships in Rural American Indian/Alaska Native Communities and the Potential of Post-Graduate Fellowships". Journal of Health Care for the Poor and Underserved. 30 (2): 442–455. doi:10.1353/hpu.2019.0040. ISSN   1548-6869. PMID   31130529. S2CID   167210450.
  63. 1 2 Henley, Tiffany; Boshier, Maureen (May 6, 2016). "The future of Indian Health Services for native Americans in the United States: an analysis of policy options and recommendations". Health Economics, Policy and Law. 11 (4): 397–414. doi:10.1017/s1744133116000141. ISSN   1744-1331. PMID   27150047. S2CID   22950373.
  64. ↑ "Tribal Consultation | CMS". www.cms.gov. Retrieved May 11, 2021.
  65. ↑ "Disparities". Indian Health Service. October 2019. Retrieved May 11, 2021.
  66. ↑ MD, Phuoc Le. "Rural Health | Arc Health Justice". www.archealthjustice.com/. Retrieved May 5, 2021.
  67. ↑ Gale Courey Toensing (March 27, 2013). "Sequestration Grounds Assistant Secretary for Indian Affairs". Indian Country Today. Archived from the original on April 20, 2013. Retrieved March 28, 2013.
  68. ↑ Editorial Board (March 20, 2013). "The Sequester Hits the Reservation" (Editorial). The New York Times. Retrieved March 28, 2013.
  69. ↑ Malerba, Marilynn (November 2013). "The Effects of Sequestration on Indian Health". Hastings Center Report. 43 (6): 17–21. doi:10.1002/hast.229. ISSN   0093-0334. PMID   24249470.
  70. ↑ Sequist, Thomas D.; Cullen, Theresa; Acton, Kelly J. (October 2011). "Indian Health Service Innovations Have Helped Reduce Health Disparities Affecting American Indian And Alaska Native People". Health Affairs. 30 (10): 1965–1973. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.2011.0630 . ISSN   0278-2715. PMID   21976341.
  71. 1 2 3 4 Bernard, Kenneth; Hasegawa, Kohei; Sullivan, Ashley; Camargo, Carlos (2017). "A Profile of Indian Health Service Emergency Departments". Annals of Emergency Medicine. 69 (6): 705–710.e4. doi:10.1016/j.annemergmed.2016.11.031. PMID   28110985. S2CID   205547184.
  72. 1 2 US Department of Health and Human Services. (2016, October). INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE HOSPITALS: LONGSTANDING CHALLENGES WARRANT FOCUSED ATTENTION TO SUPPORT QUALITY CARE. Office of Inspector General. (OEI-06-14-00011).
  73. ↑ United States Government Accountability Office. (2018, August). INDIAN HEALTH SERVICE: Agency Faces Ongoing Challenges Filling Provider Vacancies. Indian Health Service Workforce. (GAO-18-580).
  74. ↑ "More Native American Doctors Needed to Reduce Health Disparities in Their Communities". AAMC. Retrieved May 5, 2021.
  75. ↑ Fraser, Jayme (September 5, 2016). "Indian Health Service care criticized as 'genocidal' despite improvement efforts". missoulian.com. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  76. ↑ "Sickly service". The Lawton Constitution. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  77. ↑ "The Indian Health Service Paradox". Kaiser Health News. September 16, 2009. Retrieved November 1, 2017.
  78. ↑ "A review of the quality of health care for American Indians and Alaska natives" (PDF). www.commonwealthfund.org. Archived from the original (PDF) on May 31, 2016. Retrieved November 1, 2017.

Further reading

This page is based on this Wikipedia article
Text is available under the CC BY-SA 4.0 license; additional terms may apply.
Images, videos and audio are available under their respective licenses.